RealEstateIQTM
IN हिन्दी
Login Sign Up Free
Want a full project intelligence report? Download a detailed PDF report — RERA compliance, promoter, financials, amenities, location & risk.
Generate Project Report
Home / RERA Projects / GENERAL HOUSHING SCHEME SECTOR 12 PHASE 2
NEW Residential Development RERA Page
GENERATE REPORT

GENERAL HOUSHING SCHEME SECTOR 12 PHASE 2

Compliance Status
Compliant
21.2717, 81.5907 Explore area
District
Raipur
Area
—
Promoter
CHHATTISGARH HOUSING BOARD CPD-1, THRU-EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
Project Information
Promoter CHHATTISGARH HOUSING BOARD CPD-1, THRU-EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
Type Residential Development
Status New
Completion 06 Jan 2030
RERA No. PCGRERA170125001869
Registered 17 Jan 2025
Original End 06 Jan 2030
Total Units 1,093 · 129 sold
EWS Category NO
Construction Cost ₹ 2691019000
Land Cost ₹ 408437000
Authorised Person DILIP RATHI
Address General Housing Scheme Sector- I 2, Phase-I I. Nava Raipur
At a Glance
1,093
Total Units
129
Units Sold
964
Unsold
0
Legal Cases
Jan 2030
Target Completion
-
Completion
Amenities & Facilities (13)
BOUNDARY WALL
0%
COMMUNITY BUILDINGS
0%
ENERGY MAANAGEMENT
0%
FIRE PROTECTION AND FIRE SAFETY REQUIREMENTS
0%
INTERNAL ROADS AND FOOTPATHS
0%
LANDSCAPING AND TREE PLANTING
0%
OPEN PARKING
0%
SEWERAGE
0%
SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT AND DISPOSAL
0%
STORM WATER DRAINS
0%
STREET LIGHTING
0%
WATER CONSERVATION RAIN WATER HARVESTING
0%
WATER SUPPLY
0%
Project Professionals
SANJAY AGRAWAL
STATUTORY CA
VINOD KUMAR KHATRI
QUARTERLY CA
DY. COMMISSIONER HOUSING BOARD
ENGINEER
C.L. DOLE
ARCHITECT
Project Analysis

360° Project Intelligence

Comprehensive analysis across regulatory, livability, market, filing activity, and market readiness dimensions.

Regulatory
86
12 of 14 checks · Strong Signals
Livability
58
Kabir Nagar · Moderate Signals
Legal
0
No legal orders on record · 30 nearby
Filing Activity
120
108 docs · 12 quarterly updates
Market Readiness
25
New · due Jan 2030
Area Livability

Livability of Kabir Nagar

Eighteen environmental, infrastructure and amenity parameters for the nearest mapped area (Kabir Nagar — 0.64 km from this project). Click any parameter for the underlying readings, thresholds and what they mean.



🏠 Livability Parameters

Latest readings for Kabir Nagar. Only parameters with available data are shown below. Based on the latest readings for Kabir Nagar.

C
Composite Score
57.9 /100
Average

🌬️ Air Quality

Final Score: 100.0/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Air Quality?AQI summarizes PM2.5, PM10 and gases. Lower pollution values improve public health outcomes.
AQI
47
Good
PM2.5
24.2 µg/m³
≤ 40
PM10
62.4 µg/m³
≤ 60
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
PM2.5 24.2 µg/m³ ≤ 40
Good
PM10 62.4 µg/m³ ≤ 60
Concern
NO₂ 25.4 µg/m³ ≤ 40
Good
💡 What does this mean for you?Cleaner air lowers respiratory burden and improves outdoor comfort.

💧 Water Quality

Final Score: 62.5/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Water Quality?Water quality combines chemistry, supply duration and contamination markers.
TDS
457 ppm
≤ 500
pH
7.28
6.5–8.5
Supply
6.3 hr/day
≥ 8 hr
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
TDS 457 ppm ≤ 500
Good
Fluoride 1.00 mg/L ≤ 1.0
Good
Turbidity 6.6 NTU ≤ 1
Concern
💡 What does this mean for you?Better supply quality and consistency reduces dependence on tanker/groundwater fallback.

🧹 Sanitation

Final Score: 56.6/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Sanitation?Sanitation reflects ODF status, sewage treatment and waste management regularity.
ODF
ODF+
ODF++
Sewage Coverage
42%
≥ 80%
Drainage
52%
≥ 90%
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
ODF Status ODF+ ODF++
Info
Sewage Coverage 42% ≥ 80%
Concern
Drainage Coverage 52% ≥ 90%
Concern
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher sanitation maturity lowers disease exposure and neighborhood nuisance.

🛣️ Infrastructure

Final Score: 77.7/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Infrastructure?Infrastructure score combines land use, urbanization, built form, night lights and terrain indicators.
Built-up
54.4%
Balanced band
Tree Cover
12.5%
≥ 15%
Urbanization
98.2
Higher better
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Built-up (LULC) 54.4% 40-70%
Contextual
Impervious Surface 37.6% < 70%
Good
NDVI Mean 0.240 > 0.3
Concern
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Built-up (LULC) % 61.9% 46.9% 54.4%
Tree Cover % 10.1% 14.9% 12.5%
Urbanization Index 100.0 96.5 98.2
Infra Score 80.7 74.6 78.2
💡 What does this mean for you?Balanced built + green mix usually improves long-term livability resilience.

🏥 Amenities

Final Score: 78.7/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Amenities?Amenity score captures daily-access services in walk/short-drive radii.
Hospitals 500m
0
Target ≥1
Schools 1km
5
Target ≥3
Parks 500m
4
Target ≥1
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Hospitals (500m) 0 ≥1
Concern
Schools (1km) 5 ≥3
Good
Markets (1km) 7 ≥1
Good
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher local amenity density improves convenience and walkability.

🌳 Green Cover

Final Score: 42.4/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Green Cover?NDVI and vegetation structure are measured from satellite imagery to estimate neighborhood greenery.
NDVI Mean
0.219
Greenness index
Vegetation
23.0%
% green pixels
Dense Green
8.9%
Thick canopy
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
NDVI Mean 0.219 0.5 maps to score 100
Weighted 40%
Vegetation % 23.0% Direct % (cap 100)
Weighted 30%
Dense Green % 8.9% Scaled from 50%
Weighted 20%
Parks within 500m 5 Count * 33 (cap 100)
Weighted 10%
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
NDVI Mean 0.192 0.246 0.219
Vegetation % 16.8% 29.1% 23.0%
Dense Green % 8.0% 9.8% 8.9%
Tree Canopy % 11.2% 15.1% 13.2%
Green Score 33.6 42.4 38.0
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher green metrics typically reduce heat stress and improve comfort.

🔊 Noise

Final Score: 75.8/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Noise?Noise uses measured day/night dB compared to CPCB zone limits.
Day dB
47.2
vs CPCB day limit
Night dB
43.9
vs CPCB night limit
Zone
CPCB class
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Day Noise 47.2 dB ≤ 55.0 dB
Good
Night Noise 43.9 dB ≤ 45.0 dB
Good
Nearest Highway 685 m Higher usually quieter
Info
💡 What does this mean for you?Chronic high noise impacts stress, sleep quality and perceived comfort.

🌊 Flood Risk

Final Score: 17.5/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Flood Risk?Flood risk combines river exposure and local waterlogging vulnerability.
Overall Risk
Low-Medium
Lower is safer
River Risk
Low-Medium
Lower is safer
Waterlogging
Low
Lower is safer
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Overall Risk Low-Medium Low preferred
Info
River Flood Risk Low-Medium Low preferred
Info
Waterlogging Risk Low Low preferred
Info
💡 What does this mean for you?Lower flood risk means less disruption and lower hazard exposure.

🏚️ Earthquake Risk

Final Score: 10.0/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Earthquake Risk?Earthquake profile uses seismic zone, PGA and soil/liquefaction risk factors.
Seismic Zone
Zone II
Lower risk zone preferred
Risk Level
Low
Low preferred
Liquefaction
None
Low preferred
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Seismic Zone Zone II II preferred
Info
Risk Level Low Low preferred
Info
PGA (475yr) 0.0155g Lower preferred
Info
💡 What does this mean for you?Lower seismic hazard reduces structural and insurance risk exposure.

🌡️ Land Surface Temp

Final Score: 55.3/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Land Surface Temp?Land Surface Temperature reflects heat-island intensity from satellite thermal bands.
LST Mean
31.2°C
Lower better
LST Min
17.7°C
Context
LST Max
41.3°C
Lower better
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
LST Mean 31.2°C 20°C best / 45°C worst
Weighted by formula
LST Score 55.3 0-100
Computed
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
LST Mean (°C) 31.0 31.3 31.2
LST Min (°C) 13.9 21.5 17.7
LST Max (°C) 41.5 41.0 41.3
LST Score 55.8 54.8 55.3
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher heat exposure affects comfort, cooling load and health risk.

🏗️ Built-up Density

Final Score: 45.6/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Built-up Density?Built-up density measures extent of developed surface versus open space.
Built-up %
54.4%
Lower better
Open Space %
45.6%
Higher better
Built-up Score
45.6
0-100
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Built-up % 54.4% Inverse scoring
Score = 100 - builtup%
Open Space % 45.6% Context
Info
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Built-up % 61.9% 46.9% 54.4%
Open Space % 38.1% 53.1% 45.6%
Built-up Score 38.1 53.1 45.6
💡 What does this mean for you?Very high built-up often raises heat and runoff while reducing open environmental buffers.

💡 Night-time Lights

Final Score: 38.5/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Night-time Lights?Nighttime lights are a proxy for economic activity and electrification intensity.
Avg Radiance
19.26
Higher better
Max Radiance
29.65
Context
NTL Score
38.5
0-100
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Avg Radiance 19.26 Scaled to 50
Score = min(100, avg/50*100)
NTL Score 38.5 0-100
Computed
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Avg Radiance 20.36 18.17 19.26
Max Radiance 31.70 27.59 29.65
NTL Score 40.7 36.3 38.5
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher radiance often indicates stronger urban activity but can correlate with light pollution.

🏞️ Water Bodies

Final Score: 100.0/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Water Bodies?Water-bodies score reflects permanent and seasonal water presence in the analysis radius.
Permanent Water
56.51%
Higher generally better
Seasonal Water
96.56%
Context
Water Score
100.0
0-100
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Permanent Water % 56.51% 70% weight
Scaled against 10%
Seasonal Water % 96.56% 30% weight
Scaled against 20%
Water Score 100.0 0-100
Computed
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Permanent Water % 63.90% 49.12% 56.51%
Seasonal Water % 99.37% 93.75% 96.56%
Water Score 100.0 100.0 100.0
💡 What does this mean for you?Water presence can support cooling, recharge and ecological quality.

👥 Population Density

Final Score: 74.4/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Population Density?Population density indicates urban crowding pressure around the area.
Population
74,131
Estimated residents
Density/km²
5,131.3
Lower better for this score
Score
74.3
0-100
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Density/km² 5,131.3 Inverse scale up to 20,000
Lower -> higher score
Score 74.3 0-100
Computed
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Population Total 17,738 130,524 74,131
Density / km² 5,646.2 4,616.3 5,131.3
Pop Density Score 71.8 76.9 74.3
💡 What does this mean for you?Extremely high density can increase pressure on services and mobility.

⛲ Groundwater

Final Score: 63.2/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Groundwater?Groundwater score combines moisture, recharge, drought and trend indicators.
Soil Moisture
130.852
Higher better
Recharge
2.50
Higher better
PDSI
3.05
Higher better
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Soil Moisture 130.852 30% weight
Scaled
Recharge 2.50 25% weight
Scaled
PDSI 3.05 20% weight
Scaled
SM Trend 0.0000 15% weight
Scaled
Precipitation 1,875.37 10% weight
Scaled
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Soil Moisture 130.942 130.763 130.852
Recharge Estimate 2.40 2.59 2.50
PDSI 3.05 3.05 3.05
Groundwater Score 63.2 63.2 63.2
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher score suggests better long-term aquifer and moisture support conditions.

🌧️ Waterlogging

↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Waterlogging?Waterlogging combines topography, imperviousness and wetness indices across nearby grid cells.
Grid Count
19
Sampled cells
Avg Susceptibility
52.6
Lower is safer
High Risk Grids
16
High / Very High
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTargetStatus
Avg Susceptibility 52.6 < 40
Concern
Avg Slope 2.65° > 1°
Good
Avg Impervious 38.6% < 70%
Good
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher susceptibility and low slope increase monsoon water stagnation probability.

🚶 Walkability & Safety

↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Walkability & Safety?OSM amenity metrics reflect pedestrian, safety and urban accessibility infrastructure.
Footpaths
0
Higher better
Street Lamps
0
Higher better
Police/Fire Access
3
Presence
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Footpaths (500m) 0 ≥ 3
Concern
Sidewalk Roads (1km) 0 ≥ 5
Concern
Nearest Police Station 1,698 m ≤ 2000m
Context
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher OSM accessibility/safety features generally improve everyday livability.

🌬️ Air Quality: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

💧 Water Quality: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🧹 Sanitation: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🛣️ Infrastructure: Infrastructure Score Formula

Formula: Composite weighted model from GHSL/ESA/VIIRS/Terrain features
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Urbanization index98.2420%SMOD
Built-up balance54.4%15%Best in moderate band
NTL stability69.0%15%Power/activity consistency
Avg building height7.17 m10%Vertical infra proxy
Impervious %37.6%10%Moderate is optimal
Radiance19.3210%Development proxy
Slope0.10°10%Flatter is better
Green support12.5%10%Tree + grass contribution
This is the same weighted structure used in Livability Infrastructure model.
Final: 78.17 / 100

🏥 Amenities: Amenity Score Breakdown

Formula: Each amenity category is capped at 100, final score is averaged across categories
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Hospitals 500m0 * 33Cap 100Health access
Schools 1km5 * 20Cap 100Education access
Markets 1km7 * 33Cap 100Daily needs
Parks 500m4 * 33Cap 100Open space
Transit 1km0 * 50Cap 100Mobility
Category multipliers mirror the Livability snapshot logic.
Final: Final from amenity_scores table

🌳 Green Cover: Green Score Formula

Formula: Score = (NDVI*40%) + (Vegetation*30%) + (Dense Green*20%) + (Parks*10%)
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
NDVI component0.219 => 43.840%17.5
Vegetation component23.0% => 23.030%6.9
Dense green component8.9% => 17.820%3.6
Parks component5 => 100.010%10.0
This matches the Livability GreenCover model weighting logic.
Final: 37.96 / 100

🔊 Noise: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🌊 Flood Risk: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🏚️ Earthquake Risk: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🌡️ Land Surface Temp: LST Score Formula

Formula: Score = ((45 - LST Mean) / 25) * 100, clipped to [0,100]
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
LST Mean31.18 °CReference20°C best, 45°C worst
Lower land surface temperature means better livability.
Final: 55.28 / 100

🏗️ Built-up Density: Built-up Score Formula

Formula: Score = 100 - Built-up %
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Built-up %54.4%InverseLower is better
Dense concrete surfaces reduce infiltration and increase heat islands.
Final: 45.58 / 100

💡 Night-time Lights: Night-time Lights Formula

Formula: Score = min(100, (Avg Radiance / 50) * 100)
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Avg Radiance19.26Scale 0-50Higher indicates activity
Higher night radiance generally tracks electrification and economic intensity.
Final: 38.53 / 100

🏞️ Water Bodies: Water Bodies Score Formula

Formula: Score = (Permanent Water Score * 70%) + (Seasonal Water Score * 30%)
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Permanent water56.51%70%Scaled against 10% benchmark
Seasonal water96.56%30%Scaled against 20% benchmark
Permanent water has higher score weight than seasonal water.
Final: 100.00 / 100

👥 Population Density: Population Density Formula

Formula: Score = ((20000 - density_per_km²) / 20000) * 100, clipped to [0,100]
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Density5,131.3 /km²Inverse scaleLower density -> higher score
This follows the Livability PopulationDensity model.
Final: 74.34 / 100

⛲ Groundwater: Groundwater Score Formula

Formula: Weighted: Soil Moisture 30% + Recharge 25% + PDSI 20% + Trend 15% + Precipitation 10%
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Soil moisture130.85230%Scaled to 0-200
Recharge estimate2.5025%Scaled -200 to +400
PDSI3.0520%Scaled -4 to +4
SM trend0.000015%Scaled -50 to +50
Precipitation1,875.3710%Scaled 800 to 1800
Exactly reused from Livability Groundwater model logic.
Final: 63.19 / 100

🌧️ Waterlogging: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🚶 Walkability & Safety: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

View full livability report for Kabir Nagar →

Compliance Status

RERA registration, filings, and compliance flags based on public CG-RERA records.

Compliance Status Based on public CG-RERA records
4 Passed
2 N/A
RERA Registration Active
Reg No. PCGRERA170125001869 — Status: New
Section 3 · Source · RERA Official Page
No RERA Orders
No complaints or orders found against this project
Sec 38–63 · Source
No Orders in Last 12 Months
Clean record — no complaints or orders filed
Source
Within Timeline
Target completion: 06 Jan 2030
Section 4 · Source
Quarterly Updates Not Available
No compliance snapshot data on record
Section 11 · Source
Annual Audit Not Available
No compliance snapshot data on record
Section 4(2)(l)(D) · Source
Each check is based on publicly available CG-RERA portal data as of May 2026. How this works →
Other Projects by Same Promoter (7)
ProjectRERA No.StatusDistrictType
construction of commercial complex at sardar vall PCGRERA060421001221 Ongoing Raipur Commercial Development
CONSTRUCTION OF COMMERCIAL COMPLEX AT SARDAR VALLB PCGRERA290520001114 Ongoing Raipur Commercial Development
DEVLOPMENT OF PLOT KH. NO. 680/127 TOTAL 9.308 HECT UNDER SPECIAL HOUSING SCHEME AT SERIKHERI RAIPUR PCGRERA140524001774 New Raipur Residential Plotted Development
naya raipur mukhyamantri awas yojna pmay sector-16 PCGRERA070718000487 Ongoing Raipur Residential Development
naya raipur mukhyamantri awas yojna pmay sector-30 PCGRERA070718000493 Ongoing Raipur Residential Development
naya raipur mukhyamantri awas yojna pmay sector-34 PCGRERA050718000464 Ongoing Raipur Residential Development
SECTOR-29 TOWNSHIP, NAYA RAIPUR PCGRERA040718000436 Ongoing Raipur Residential Development

Details

Registration, professional team, bank, promoters, and compliance history.

Registration Details
RERA Number
PCGRERA170125001869
Status
New
Project Type
Residential Development
Approved Date
17 Jan 2025
Original End Date
06 Jan 2030
EWS Category
NO
Construction Cost
₹ 2691019000
Land Cost
₹ 408437000
Proposed Completion
06 Jan 2030
Authorised Person
DILIP RATHI
View on Map
Professional Team
RoleNameLicense / Membership
Statutory CA Sanjay Agrawal 096775
Quarterly CA VINOD KUMAR KHATRI 071797
Engineer Dy. Commissioner Housing board 1
Architect C.L. DOLE CA/89/12366
Promoters
C
CHHATTISGARH HOUSING BOARD CPD-1, THRU-EXECUTIVE ENGINEER Government/Semi Government Agency
C
CHHATTISGARH HOUSING BOARD CPD-1 Government/Semi Government Agency

Buildings & Units

Inventory overview, sold/unsold breakdown, and building details.

Inventory Overview
1,093
Total Inventory
129
Sold (12%)
964
Unsold (88%)
0
Mortgage (0%)
12%
88%
Sold Unsold Mortgage
Quarterly Plot Updates
PeriodTotalSold (prev)Sold (qtr)RemainingMortgage
2025-10-01 – 2025-12-31 0 0 0 0 0
2025-07-01 – 2025-09-30 0 0 0 0 0
2025-04-01 – 2025-06-30 0 0 0 0 0
2025-01-17 – 2025-03-31 0 0 0 0 0
Quarterly Building Updates
PeriodTotalSold (prev)Sold (qtr)RemainingMortgage
2025-10-01 – 2025-12-31 348 102 0 246 0
2025-07-01 – 2025-09-30 348 102 0 246 0
2025-04-01 – 2025-06-30 348 80 22 246 0
2025-01-17 – 2025-03-31 348 0 80 268 0
Quarterly Apartment Updates
PeriodTotalSold (prev)Sold (qtr)RemainingMortgage
2025-10-01 – 2025-12-31 745 27 0 718 0
2025-07-01 – 2025-09-30 745 27 0 718 0
2025-04-01 – 2025-06-30 745 25 2 718 0
2025-01-17 – 2025-03-31 745 0 25 720 0

Legal Orders & Cases

RERA legal orders, complaints, and case statistics filed against this project.

Legal Orders (0)
ComplaintApplicantSectionDateSourcePDF
No orders found for this project.

Location

Project address, coordinates, and nearby places.

Location Details
Address
General Housing Scheme Sector- I 2, Phase-I I. Nava Raipur
District
Raipur
Tehsil
Raipur
Coordinates
21.2716973, 81.5906504 View on Map
Area Livability

Livability of Kabir Nagar Raipur

Environmental, infrastructure & amenity parameters for the area where this project is located (0.64 km from project). Each value is compared with the Raipur average.

Composite Livability Score
57.9 / 100
Grade C · Average
-1.0 vs Raipur avg (58.9)
Air Quality
100.0 Excellent
Area
100
City
99
+1.4 vs city avg
Water Quality
62.5 Average
Area
63
City
68
-5.4 vs city avg
Sanitation
56.6 Average
Area
57
City
56
+0.6 vs city avg
Green Cover
42.4 Below Avg
Area
42
City
39
+3.9 vs city avg
Noise Level
75.8 Good
Area
76
City
58
+18.0 vs city avg
Infrastructure
77.7 Good
Area
78
City
76
+1.5 vs city avg
Amenities
78.7 Good
Area
79
City
82
-3.1 vs city avg
Flood Safety
17.5 Poor
Area
18
City
38
-20.6 vs city avg
Earthquake Safety
10.0 Poor
Area
10
City
15
-4.6 vs city avg
Land Surface Temp.
55.3 Average
Area
55
City
58
-2.5 vs city avg
Built-up Density
45.6 Below Avg
Area
46
City
35
+10.8 vs city avg
Night-light Activity
38.5 Below Avg
Area
39
City
55
-16.2 vs city avg
Water Bodies Nearby
100.0 Excellent
Area
100
City
93
+7.3 vs city avg
Population Density
74.4 Good
Area
74
City
68
+6.4 vs city avg
Groundwater Status
63.2 Average
Area
63
City
63
-0.2 vs city avg
View detailed livability report for Kabir Nagar
Neighborhood Intelligence

Explore nearby infrastructure around this project. Toggle categories to show/hide on the map.

Neighborhood Map 3 km radius
RERA Projects Near GENERAL HOUSHING SCHEME SECTOR 12 PHASE 2 30 found within 3 km
# Project District Status Distance
1 v3 bAlaji green city, & balaji hights Raipur Ongoing 0.41 km
2 CONSTRUCTION & DEVELOPMNT OF 96 LIG (G+6)&48 EWS (G+6) FLATS AT PHASE-3 KABIR NAGAR RAIPUR Raipur New 0.64 km
3 imperial heights Raipur Ongoing 0.64 km
4 CELEBRITY HOMES Raipur Ongoing 0.86 km
5 sun city Raipur Ongoing 0.98 km
6 HARSHIT LANDMARK (PHASE-IV, BLOCK-G) Raipur Ongoing 1.01 km
7 HARSHIT LANDMARK (PHASE-III, BLOCK -E & F) Raipur Ongoing 1.01 km
8 harshit landmark (phase-i, block -a&b) Raipur Ongoing 1.07 km
9 HARSHIT LANDMARK (PHASE-II, BLOCK- C & D) Raipur Ongoing 1.11 km
10 construction of 27 no jr mig(3bhk) at phase-4 kabir nagar raipur Raipur New 1.24 km
11 Avinash Aashiyana Extension Raipur New 1.31 km
12 ARYAPOLIS Raipur Ongoing 1.32 km
13 govinda green Raipur New 1.42 km
14 shree ram vihar Raipur New 1.46 km
15 maruti life style tower Raipur New 1.49 km
16 fortune residency Raipur New 1.53 km
17 GOLDEN ARCADE Raipur Ongoing 1.54 km
18 saheb society Raipur Ongoing 1.55 km
19 life style empressa Raipur Ongoing 1.55 km
20 ishaan heightS Raipur New 1.63 km
21 pmay of 696(dus) at sondongri ,raipur Raipur Ongoing 1.71 km
22 VEDANTA VATIKA Raipur New 1.75 km
23 Avinash pride Raipur New 1.81 km
24 PARTHIVI PACIFIC-ROYAL WOODS Raipur Ongoing 1.83 km
25 KANCHAN VIHAR PHASE - I Raipur Ongoing 2.09 km
26 mansarovar residency Raipur Ongoing 2.11 km
27 kanchan vihar phase -ii Raipur Ongoing 2.13 km
28 TIRUPATI ENCLAVE PHASE- II Raipur Ongoing 2.18 km
29 URBAN ESTATE Phase II Raipur New 2.26 km
30 PARK AVENUE Raipur New 2.27 km

Buyer Checklist

Documents and verifications a buyer should review before purchase.

Buyer Document Verification Checklist

Key documents a buyer should verify before purchasing in this project. Items marked Available have data on Seemankan.

11/14 verified
  • RERA Registration Certificate Available
    Confirms the project is registered with RERA CG. Verify registration number, validity dates, and project details on the RERA portal.
    RERA No: PCGRERA170125001869
    View on RERA Portal
  • Promoter Registration Certificate Available
    Builder / colonizer company registration certificate. Confirms the promoter entity is a registered firm, company, or society.
    Preview Preview
  • Approved Building / Sanction Plan Available
    Building plan sanctioned by the local authority. Verify floor count, setbacks, and FSI compliance.
    Preview Preview
  • Layout Plan Available
    Approved layout showing plot divisions, roads, open spaces, and common areas.
    Preview
  • Title Deed / Ownership Proof Available
    Proof that the promoter legally owns the land. Verify via Sub-Registrar records.
    Preview
  • Encumbrance Certificate Available
    Confirms the property is free from legal dues, mortgages, or liens. Obtain from Sub-Registrar office.
    Preview
  • Land Use / Diversion Certificate Available
    Required if land was converted from agricultural to non-agricultural use.
    Preview
  • Architect Certificate Available
    Certification from a registered architect confirming structural plans and compliance.
    View View View +2 more
  • Structural Engineer Certificate Available
    Certification from a structural engineer confirming building safety and load-bearing capacity.
    View View View +2 more
  • CA Financial Certificate Available
    Chartered Accountant certificate on financial status, project cost estimates, and fund utilization.
    Preview View View +3 more
  • Commencement Certificate Verify Independently
    Permission to begin construction issued by the local authority after plan approval.
  • NOCs (No Objection Certificates) Verify Independently
    NOCs from fire department, environment, water supply, electricity board, and other authorities.
  • Project Brochure / Specification Available
    Official brochure with unit types, amenities, and specifications. Compare with actual delivery.
    View View View +3 more
  • RERA Compliance Orders Verify Independently
    Check if any orders, penalties, or directions have been issued against this project by RERA.
Disclaimer: This checklist is for informational purposes only. "Available" means Seemankan has a copy from the RERA portal — it does not constitute legal verification. Always verify original documents with the concerned authorities and consult a legal advisor before making a purchase decision.

Risk Zone Within 5 km

Buffer zones (water bodies, airport restrictions) and risk sites (landfills, waste processing) detected within 3 km (immediate) and 5 km (extended) of the project.

17
Risk zones (within 5 km)
3 km: 6 3–5 km: 11
10
Water bodies (river/nala/lake)
3 km: 3 3–5 km: 7
7
Landfill / waste sites
3 km: 3 3–5 km: 4
0
Airport buffer overlap
3 km: 0 3–5 km: 0
Risk Zone Map (3 km & 5 km rings) Project marker centered
Water Bodies (10)
  • Serikhedi Talab ≤3 km
    Tank · 50m buffer
    0.87 km
  • Tatibandh Talab ≤3 km
    Tank · 50m buffer
    2.22 km
  • Tatibandh Nala ≤3 km
    Nala · 20m buffer
    2.86 km
  • Sarora Talab 3–5 km
    Pond · 50m buffer
    3.62 km
  • Kumhari Talab 3–5 km
    Tank · 50m buffer
    3.7 km
  • Mowa Talab 3–5 km
    Tank · 50m buffer
    3.71 km
  • Mowa Nala 3–5 km
    Nala · 20m buffer
    4.27 km
  • Maharajband Talab 3–5 km
    Tank · 50m buffer
    4.32 km
Landfill / Waste Sites (7)
  • Gudhiyari Old Dump Site ≤3 km
    Legacy dump · 500m buffer
    1.3 km
  • Tatibandh Legacy Dump ≤3 km
    Legacy dump · 500m buffer
    2.1 km
  • Jarway Transfer Station ≤3 km
    Transfer station · 100m buffer
    2.44 km
  • Old Raipur Trenching Ground 3–5 km
    Inactive landfill · 500m buffer
    3.17 km
  • Sarora SLRM Centre (Manikanchan Kendra) 3–5 km
    Waste processing · 200m buffer
    3.36 km
  • Sarora Composting / Bio-methanation Plant 3–5 km
    Waste processing · 200m buffer
    4.85 km
  • Sarora Trenching Ground 3–5 km
    Active landfill · 500m buffer
    5 km

Documents

RERA-filed documents and disclosures available for this project.

RERA Documents (108)
AMOUNT (3)
View View View
APARTMENTPHOTO (30)
View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View
ARCH (5)
View View View View View
BOROUCHRE (5)
View View View View View
BRIEF (1)
Preview
BUILDING (1)
Preview
BUILDINGPHOTO (30)
View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View
CA (6)
Preview View View View View View
COLONIZER (1)
Preview
COMMON (1)
Preview
DEV (1)
Preview
DEVE (1)
Preview
DIVERSION (1)
Preview
Demarcation (1)
Preview
ENGG (5)
View View View View View
ENUM (1)
Preview
FEESHEET (1)
Preview
LAYOUT (1)
Preview
PASSBOOK (1)
Preview
PHOTO (1)
Download
Reg (1)
Preview
SANCTIONBUILDING (1)
Preview
SEARCH (1)
Preview
SELF (1)
Preview
TAC (1)
Preview
other (6)
Preview Preview Preview Preview Preview Preview

Reviews

Verified buyer reviews and ratings for this project.

No reviews yet. Be the first to review this project!

Login to Write a Review

You need to be signed in to submit a review for this project.

Login or Register