You're viewing a preview. Log in or create a free account to see the full page.
RealEstateIQTM
IN हिन्दी
Login Sign Up Free
Want a full project intelligence report? Download a detailed PDF report — RERA compliance, promoter, financials, amenities, location & risk.
Generate Project Report
Home / RERA Projects / METROPOLIS
ONGOING Commercial Development RERA Page Project Website
GENERATE REPORT

METROPOLIS

Compliance Status
Partial Compliance
21.2449, 81.6341 Explore area
District
Raipur
Area
—
Promoter
KANKER ROADWAYS
Project Information
Promoter KANKER ROADWAYS
Type Commercial Development
Status Ongoing
Completion 30 Sep 2021
RERA No. PCGRERA201119001071
Registered 20 Nov 2019
Original End 31 Dec 2020
Total Units 1
EWS Category NO
Construction Cost ₹ 10237000
Authorised Person NAVPREET SUNGH GARCHA
Address GUJARTI SCHOOL STREET , M.G.ROAD RAIPUR ,TEHSIL-RAIPUR,DIST.RAIPUR
At a Glance
1
Total Units
-
Units Sold
1
Unsold
1
Legal Cases
Sep 2021
Target Completion
100%
Completion
Amenities & Facilities (7)
BOUNDARY WALL
100%
FIRE PROTECTION AND FIRE SAFETY REQUIREMENTS
100%
INTERNAL ROADS AND FOOTPATHS
100%
SEWERAGE
100%
STREET LIGHTING
100%
WATER CONSERVATION RAIN WATER HARVESTING
100%
WATER SUPPLY
100%
Project Professionals
SANJEEB KUMAR JAIN
STATUTORY CA
SUMIT JAIN
QUARTERLY CA
ROHAN KUMAR GUPTA
ENGINEER
KRITI NATHANI
ARCHITECT
Project Analysis

360° Project Intelligence

Comprehensive analysis across regulatory, livability, market, filing activity, and market readiness dimensions.

Regulatory
43
6 of 14 checks · Weak Signals
Livability
72
Jawahar Market · Moderate Signals
Legal
1
1 legal order(s) · 22 nearby
Filing Activity
186
153 docs · 33 quarterly updates
Market Readiness
0
Ongoing · due Sep 2021
Area Livability

Livability of Jawahar Market

Eighteen environmental, infrastructure and amenity parameters for the nearest mapped area (Jawahar Market — 0.37 km from this project). Click any parameter for the underlying readings, thresholds and what they mean.



🏠 Livability Parameters

Latest readings for Jawahar Market. Only parameters with available data are shown below. Based on the latest readings for Jawahar Market.

B
Composite Score
72.2 /100
Good

🌬️ Air Quality

Final Score: 100.0/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Air Quality?AQI summarizes PM2.5, PM10 and gases. Lower pollution values improve public health outcomes.
AQI
47
Good
PM2.5
18.2 µg/m³
≤ 40
PM10
43.5 µg/m³
≤ 60
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
PM2.5 18.2 µg/m³ ≤ 40
Good
PM10 43.5 µg/m³ ≤ 60
Good
NO₂ 26.5 µg/m³ ≤ 40
Good
💡 What does this mean for you?Cleaner air lowers respiratory burden and improves outdoor comfort.

💧 Water Quality

Final Score: 61.7/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Water Quality?Water quality combines chemistry, supply duration and contamination markers.
TDS
364 ppm
≤ 500
pH
7.37
6.5–8.5
Supply
6.1 hr/day
≥ 8 hr
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
TDS 364 ppm ≤ 500
Good
Fluoride 1.09 mg/L ≤ 1.0
Concern
Turbidity 5.9 NTU ≤ 1
Concern
💡 What does this mean for you?Better supply quality and consistency reduces dependence on tanker/groundwater fallback.

🧹 Sanitation

Final Score: 68.4/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Sanitation?Sanitation reflects ODF status, sewage treatment and waste management regularity.
ODF
ODF+
ODF++
Sewage Coverage
58%
≥ 80%
Drainage
68%
≥ 90%
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
ODF Status ODF+ ODF++
Info
Sewage Coverage 58% ≥ 80%
Concern
Drainage Coverage 68% ≥ 90%
Concern
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher sanitation maturity lowers disease exposure and neighborhood nuisance.

🛣️ Infrastructure

Final Score: 79.5/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Infrastructure?Infrastructure score combines land use, urbanization, built form, night lights and terrain indicators.
Built-up
82.8%
Balanced band
Tree Cover
9.9%
≥ 15%
Urbanization
100.0
Higher better
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Built-up (LULC) 82.8% 40-70%
Contextual
Impervious Surface 50.2% < 70%
Good
NDVI Mean 0.220 > 0.3
Concern
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Built-up (LULC) % 86.5% 79.1% 82.8%
Tree Cover % 8.2% 11.7% 9.9%
Urbanization Index 100.0 100.0 100.0
Infra Score 78.6 80.5 79.9
💡 What does this mean for you?Balanced built + green mix usually improves long-term livability resilience.

🏥 Amenities

Final Score: 80.3/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Amenities?Amenity score captures daily-access services in walk/short-drive radii.
Hospitals 500m
1
Target ≥1
Schools 1km
11
Target ≥3
Parks 500m
0
Target ≥1
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Hospitals (500m) 1 ≥1
Good
Schools (1km) 11 ≥3
Good
Markets (1km) 9 ≥1
Good
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher local amenity density improves convenience and walkability.

🌳 Green Cover

Final Score: 24.6/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Green Cover?NDVI and vegetation structure are measured from satellite imagery to estimate neighborhood greenery.
NDVI Mean
0.173
Greenness index
Vegetation
12.6%
% green pixels
Dense Green
8.5%
Thick canopy
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
NDVI Mean 0.173 0.5 maps to score 100
Weighted 40%
Vegetation % 12.6% Direct % (cap 100)
Weighted 30%
Dense Green % 8.5% Scaled from 50%
Weighted 20%
Parks within 500m 0 Count * 33 (cap 100)
Weighted 10%
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
NDVI Mean 0.149 0.197 0.173
Vegetation % 10.6% 14.6% 12.6%
Dense Green % 5.8% 11.1% 8.5%
Tree Canopy % 5.3% 9.6% 7.5%
Green Score 17.4 24.6 21.0
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher green metrics typically reduce heat stress and improve comfort.

🔊 Noise

Final Score: 62.5/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Noise?Noise uses measured day/night dB compared to CPCB zone limits.
Day dB
56.6
vs CPCB day limit
Night dB
45.6
vs CPCB night limit
Zone
CPCB class
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Day Noise 56.6 dB ≤ 65.0 dB
Good
Night Noise 45.6 dB ≤ 55.0 dB
Good
Nearest Highway 839 m Higher usually quieter
Info
💡 What does this mean for you?Chronic high noise impacts stress, sleep quality and perceived comfort.

🌊 Flood Risk

Final Score: 82.5/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Flood Risk?Flood risk combines river exposure and local waterlogging vulnerability.
Overall Risk
Low-Medium
Lower is safer
River Risk
Low-Medium
Lower is safer
Waterlogging
Low
Lower is safer
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Overall Risk Low-Medium Low preferred
Info
River Flood Risk Low-Medium Low preferred
Info
Waterlogging Risk Low Low preferred
Info
💡 What does this mean for you?Lower flood risk means less disruption and lower hazard exposure.

🏚️ Earthquake Risk

Final Score: 90.0/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Earthquake Risk?Earthquake profile uses seismic zone, PGA and soil/liquefaction risk factors.
Seismic Zone
Zone II
Lower risk zone preferred
Risk Level
Low
Low preferred
Liquefaction
None
Low preferred
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Seismic Zone Zone II II preferred
Info
Risk Level Low Low preferred
Info
PGA (475yr) 0.0155g Lower preferred
Info
💡 What does this mean for you?Lower seismic hazard reduces structural and insurance risk exposure.

🌡️ Land Surface Temp

Final Score: 54.0/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Land Surface Temp?Land Surface Temperature reflects heat-island intensity from satellite thermal bands.
LST Mean
31.5°C
Lower better
LST Min
23.9°C
Context
LST Max
40.7°C
Lower better
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
LST Mean 31.5°C 20°C best / 45°C worst
Weighted by formula
LST Score 54.0 0-100
Computed
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
LST Mean (°C) 32.1 31.0 31.5
LST Min (°C) 25.7 22.0 23.9
LST Max (°C) 41.3 40.2 40.7
LST Score 51.8 56.2 54.0
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher heat exposure affects comfort, cooling load and health risk.

🏗️ Built-up Density

Final Score: 17.2/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Built-up Density?Built-up density measures extent of developed surface versus open space.
Built-up %
82.8%
Lower better
Open Space %
17.2%
Higher better
Built-up Score
17.2
0-100
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Built-up % 82.8% Inverse scoring
Score = 100 - builtup%
Open Space % 17.2% Context
Info
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Built-up % 86.5% 79.1% 82.8%
Open Space % 13.5% 20.9% 17.2%
Built-up Score 13.5 20.9 17.2
💡 What does this mean for you?Very high built-up often raises heat and runoff while reducing open environmental buffers.

💡 Night-time Lights

Final Score: 74.1/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Night-time Lights?Nighttime lights are a proxy for economic activity and electrification intensity.
Avg Radiance
37.02
Higher better
Max Radiance
59.39
Context
NTL Score
74.1
0-100
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Avg Radiance 37.02 Scaled to 50
Score = min(100, avg/50*100)
NTL Score 74.1 0-100
Computed
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Avg Radiance 41.23 32.82 37.02
Max Radiance 66.95 51.84 59.39
NTL Score 82.5 65.6 74.1
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher radiance often indicates stronger urban activity but can correlate with light pollution.

🏞️ Water Bodies

Final Score: 100.0/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Water Bodies?Water-bodies score reflects permanent and seasonal water presence in the analysis radius.
Permanent Water
77.74%
Higher generally better
Seasonal Water
98.12%
Context
Water Score
100.0
0-100
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Permanent Water % 77.74% 70% weight
Scaled against 10%
Seasonal Water % 98.12% 30% weight
Scaled against 20%
Water Score 100.0 0-100
Computed
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Permanent Water % 89.23% 66.25% 77.74%
Seasonal Water % 98.39% 97.85% 98.12%
Water Score 100.0 100.0 100.0
💡 What does this mean for you?Water presence can support cooling, recharge and ecological quality.

👥 Population Density

Final Score: 57.5/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Population Density?Population density indicates urban crowding pressure around the area.
Population
133,317
Estimated residents
Density/km²
8,504.9
Lower better for this score
Score
57.5
0-100
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Density/km² 8,504.9 Inverse scale up to 20,000
Lower -> higher score
Score 57.5 0-100
Computed
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Population Total 26,788 239,845 133,317
Density / km² 8,526.9 8,482.8 8,504.9
Pop Density Score 57.4 57.6 57.5
💡 What does this mean for you?Extremely high density can increase pressure on services and mobility.

⛲ Groundwater

Final Score: 63.3/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Groundwater?Groundwater score combines moisture, recharge, drought and trend indicators.
Soil Moisture
133.562
Higher better
Recharge
0.28
Higher better
PDSI
2.98
Higher better
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Soil Moisture 133.562 30% weight
Scaled
Recharge 0.28 25% weight
Scaled
PDSI 2.98 20% weight
Scaled
SM Trend 0.0000 15% weight
Scaled
Precipitation 1,875.19 10% weight
Scaled
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Soil Moisture 133.868 133.256 133.562
Recharge Estimate -0.15 0.70 0.28
PDSI 2.97 3.00 2.98
Groundwater Score 63.3 63.4 63.3
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher score suggests better long-term aquifer and moisture support conditions.

🚶 Walkability & Safety

↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Walkability & Safety?OSM amenity metrics reflect pedestrian, safety and urban accessibility infrastructure.
Footpaths
4
Higher better
Street Lamps
0
Higher better
Police/Fire Access
1
Presence
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Footpaths (500m) 4 ≥ 3
Good
Sidewalk Roads (1km) 0 ≥ 5
Concern
Nearest Police Station 1,150 m ≤ 2000m
Context
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher OSM accessibility/safety features generally improve everyday livability.

🌬️ Air Quality: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

💧 Water Quality: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🧹 Sanitation: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🛣️ Infrastructure: Infrastructure Score Formula

Formula: Composite weighted model from GHSL/ESA/VIIRS/Terrain features
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Urbanization index100.0020%SMOD
Built-up balance82.8%15%Best in moderate band
NTL stability68.0%15%Power/activity consistency
Avg building height10.46 m10%Vertical infra proxy
Impervious %50.2%10%Moderate is optimal
Radiance36.8210%Development proxy
Slope0.10°10%Flatter is better
Green support9.9%10%Tree + grass contribution
This is the same weighted structure used in Livability Infrastructure model.
Final: 79.85 / 100

🏥 Amenities: Amenity Score Breakdown

Formula: Each amenity category is capped at 100, final score is averaged across categories
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Hospitals 500m1 * 33Cap 100Health access
Schools 1km11 * 20Cap 100Education access
Markets 1km9 * 33Cap 100Daily needs
Parks 500m0 * 33Cap 100Open space
Transit 1km1 * 50Cap 100Mobility
Category multipliers mirror the Livability snapshot logic.
Final: Final from amenity_scores table

🌳 Green Cover: Green Score Formula

Formula: Score = (NDVI*40%) + (Vegetation*30%) + (Dense Green*20%) + (Parks*10%)
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
NDVI component0.173 => 34.640%13.8
Vegetation component12.6% => 12.630%3.8
Dense green component8.5% => 16.920%3.4
Parks component0 => 0.010%0.0
This matches the Livability GreenCover model weighting logic.
Final: 21.01 / 100

🔊 Noise: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🌊 Flood Risk: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🏚️ Earthquake Risk: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🌡️ Land Surface Temp: LST Score Formula

Formula: Score = ((45 - LST Mean) / 25) * 100, clipped to [0,100]
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
LST Mean31.51 °CReference20°C best, 45°C worst
Lower land surface temperature means better livability.
Final: 53.96 / 100

🏗️ Built-up Density: Built-up Score Formula

Formula: Score = 100 - Built-up %
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Built-up %82.8%InverseLower is better
Dense concrete surfaces reduce infiltration and increase heat islands.
Final: 17.17 / 100

💡 Night-time Lights: Night-time Lights Formula

Formula: Score = min(100, (Avg Radiance / 50) * 100)
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Avg Radiance37.02Scale 0-50Higher indicates activity
Higher night radiance generally tracks electrification and economic intensity.
Final: 74.05 / 100

🏞️ Water Bodies: Water Bodies Score Formula

Formula: Score = (Permanent Water Score * 70%) + (Seasonal Water Score * 30%)
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Permanent water77.74%70%Scaled against 10% benchmark
Seasonal water98.12%30%Scaled against 20% benchmark
Permanent water has higher score weight than seasonal water.
Final: 100.00 / 100

👥 Population Density: Population Density Formula

Formula: Score = ((20000 - density_per_km²) / 20000) * 100, clipped to [0,100]
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Density8,504.9 /km²Inverse scaleLower density -> higher score
This follows the Livability PopulationDensity model.
Final: 57.48 / 100

⛲ Groundwater: Groundwater Score Formula

Formula: Weighted: Soil Moisture 30% + Recharge 25% + PDSI 20% + Trend 15% + Precipitation 10%
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Soil moisture133.56230%Scaled to 0-200
Recharge estimate0.2825%Scaled -200 to +400
PDSI2.9820%Scaled -4 to +4
SM trend0.000015%Scaled -50 to +50
Precipitation1,875.1910%Scaled 800 to 1800
Exactly reused from Livability Groundwater model logic.
Final: 63.34 / 100

🚶 Walkability & Safety: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

View full livability report for Jawahar Market →

Compliance Status

RERA registration, filings, and compliance flags based on public CG-RERA records.

Compliance Status Based on public CG-RERA records
3 Passed
1 Issue(s)
2 N/A
RERA Registration Active
Reg No. PCGRERA201119001071 — Status: Ongoing
Section 3 · Source · RERA Official Page
No Penalty Orders
1 order(s) on record, none with penalty sections (Sec 38/39/40/59/61/63)
Sec 38–63 · Source
No Recent Orders
No orders filed in the last 12 months (older: 1)
Source
Completion Overdue
Was due 30 Sep 2021 — overdue by ~57 month(s)
Section 4 · Source
Quarterly Updates Not Available
No compliance snapshot data on record
Section 11 · Source
Annual Audit Not Available
No compliance snapshot data on record
Section 4(2)(l)(D) · Source
Each check is based on publicly available CG-RERA portal data as of Jun 2026. How this works →

Details

Registration, professional team, bank, promoters, and compliance history.

Registration Details
RERA Number
PCGRERA201119001071
Status
Ongoing
Project Type
Commercial Development
Approved Date
20 Nov 2019
Original End Date
31 Dec 2020
EWS Category
NO
Construction Cost
₹ 10237000
Proposed Completion
30 Sep 2021
Authorised Person
NAVPREET SUNGH GARCHA
View on Map
Professional Team
RoleNameLicense / Membership
Statutory CA SANJEEB KUMAR JAIN 422298
Quarterly CA SUMIT JAIN 411593
Engineer ROHAN KUMAR GUPTA 702/2015
Architect KRITI NATHANI CA/2018/96803
Promoters
K
KANKER ROADWAYS Partnership Firm
K
KANKER ROADWAYS

Buildings & Units

Inventory overview, sold/unsold breakdown, and building details.

Inventory Overview
1
Total Inventory
0
Sold (0%)
1
Unsold (100%)
0
Mortgage (0%)
100%
Sold Unsold Mortgage
Quarterly Plot Updates
PeriodTotalSold (prev)Sold (qtr)RemainingMortgage
2022-04-01 – 2022-06-30 0 0 0 0 0
2022-01-01 – 2022-03-31 0 0 0 0 0
2021-10-01 – 2021-12-31 0 0 0 0 0
2021-07-01 – 2021-09-30 0 0 0 0 0
2021-04-01 – 2021-06-30 0 0 0 0 0
2021-01-01 – 2021-03-31 0 0 0 0 0
2020-10-01 – 2020-12-31 0 0 0 0 0
2020-07-01 – 2020-09-30 0 0 0 0 0
2020-04-01 – 2020-06-30 0 0 0 0 0
2020-01-01 – 2020-03-31 0 0 0 0 0
2019-10-01 – 2019-12-31 0 0 0 0 0
Quarterly Building Updates
PeriodTotalSold (prev)Sold (qtr)RemainingMortgage
2022-04-01 – 2022-06-30 0 0 0 0 0
2022-01-01 – 2022-03-31 0 0 0 0 0
2021-10-01 – 2021-12-31 0 0 0 0 0
2021-07-01 – 2021-09-30 0 0 0 0 0
2021-04-01 – 2021-06-30 0 0 0 0 0
2021-01-01 – 2021-03-31 0 0 0 0 0
2020-10-01 – 2020-12-31 0 0 0 0 0
2020-07-01 – 2020-09-30 0 0 0 0 0
2020-04-01 – 2020-06-30 0 0 0 0 0
2020-01-01 – 2020-03-31 0 0 0 0 0
2019-10-01 – 2019-12-31 0 0 0 0 0
Quarterly Apartment Updates
PeriodTotalSold (prev)Sold (qtr)RemainingMortgage
2022-04-01 – 2022-06-30 19 2 0 17 0
2022-01-01 – 2022-03-31 19 2 0 17 0
2021-10-01 – 2021-12-31 19 2 0 17 0
2021-07-01 – 2021-09-30 19 2 0 17 0
2021-04-01 – 2021-06-30 19 2 0 17 0
2021-01-01 – 2021-03-31 19 2 0 17 0
2020-10-01 – 2020-12-31 19 2 0 17 0
2020-07-01 – 2020-09-30 19 2 0 17 0
2020-04-01 – 2020-06-30 19 2 0 17 0
2020-01-01 – 2020-03-31 19 2 0 17 0
2019-10-01 – 2019-12-31 10 2 0 8 0

Legal Orders & Cases

RERA legal orders, complaints, and case statistics filed against this project.

1
Total Cases
0
Last 12 Months
1
Older Cases
1
PDFs Available
Legal Orders (1)
ComplaintApplicantSectionDateSourcePDF
M-COM-2021-01593 CG-RERA - 02 Mar 2023 This project

Location

Project address, coordinates, and nearby places.

Location Details
Address
GUJARTI SCHOOL STREET , M.G.ROAD RAIPUR ,TEHSIL-RAIPUR,DIST.RAIPUR
District
Raipur
Tehsil
Raipur
Coordinates
21.2448690, 81.6341081 View on Map
Area Livability

Livability of Jawahar Market Raipur

Environmental, infrastructure & amenity parameters for the area where this project is located (0.37 km from project). Each value is compared with the Raipur average.

Composite Livability Score
72.2 / 100
Grade B · Good
+2.6 vs Raipur avg (69.6)
Air Quality
100.0 Excellent
Area
100
City
99
+1.2 vs city avg
Water Quality
61.7 Average
Area
62
City
68
-6.3 vs city avg
Sanitation
68.4 Good
Area
68
City
56
+12.4 vs city avg
Green Cover
24.6 Poor
Area
25
City
39
-13.9 vs city avg
Noise Level
62.5 Average
Area
63
City
58
+4.2 vs city avg
Infrastructure
79.5 Good
Area
80
City
76
+3.8 vs city avg
Amenities
80.3 Excellent
Area
80
City
82
-1.6 vs city avg
Flood Safety
82.5 Excellent
Area
83
City
62
+20.3 vs city avg
Earthquake Safety
90.0 Excellent
Area
90
City
86
+4.5 vs city avg
Land Surface Temp.
54.0 Average
Area
54
City
58
-3.8 vs city avg
Built-up Density
17.2 Poor
Area
17
City
36
-18.3 vs city avg
Night-light Activity
74.1 Good
Area
74
City
54
+19.9 vs city avg
Water Bodies Nearby
100.0 Excellent
Area
100
City
93
+7.2 vs city avg
Population Density
57.5 Average
Area
57
City
68
-10.7 vs city avg
Groundwater Status
63.3 Average
Area
63
City
63
-0.1 vs city avg
View detailed livability report for Jawahar Market
Neighborhood Intelligence

Explore nearby infrastructure around this project. Toggle categories to show/hide on the map.

Neighborhood Map 3 km radius
RERA Projects Near METROPOLIS 22 found within 3 km
# Project District Status Distance
1 ANAND ARCADE Raipur Ongoing 0.40 km
2 PMAY OF 58 DUS AT NEAR DKS PARISAR ,RAIPUR Raipur Ongoing 0.56 km
3 AKANKSHA PARISAR Raipur Ongoing 0.92 km
4 PITHALIA PLAZA Raipur Ongoing 1.04 km
5 RAHEJA TOWER Raipur Ongoing 1.29 km
6 RAJARIA INDUSTRIAL EUIPMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED Raipur Ongoing 1.32 km
7 LALGANGA MIDAS Raipur Ongoing 2.11 km
8 GULMOHAR PARK Raipur Ongoing 2.11 km
9 pmay of 280(dus) at kata chirhuldih ,raipur Raipur Ongoing 2.32 km
10 BRIGHT ENCLAVE Raipur Ongoing 2.44 km
11 SIMRAN HEIGHTS Raipur Ongoing 2.46 km
12 CREST GREENS Raipur Ongoing 2.48 km
13 KAVISH ENCLAVE Raipur New 2.63 km
14 C.G. ELITE Raipur Ongoing 2.66 km
15 sumeet busIness park Raipur Ongoing 2.75 km
16 SLT WATER FRONT Raipur Ongoing 2.80 km
17 GOLDEN SANDS Raipur Ongoing 2.80 km
18 merlin jayshree vihar (phase-ii) Raipur Ongoing 2.85 km
19 sumeet trade center (commercial) sumeet residency(residential) Raipur New 2.94 km
20 PMAY OF 576 DUS VILLAGE -KOTA CHIRHULDIH , - RAIPUR Raipur Ongoing 2.97 km
21 GULZAR HOMES Raipur Ongoing 2.99 km
22 KALPTARU CASITA Raipur New 3.00 km

Buyer Checklist

Documents and verifications a buyer should review before purchase.

Buyer Document Verification Checklist

Key documents a buyer should verify before purchasing in this project. Items marked Available have data on Seemankan.

7/14 verified
  • RERA Registration Certificate Available
    Confirms the project is registered with RERA CG. Verify registration number, validity dates, and project details on the RERA portal.
    RERA No: PCGRERA201119001071
    View on RERA Portal
  • Promoter Registration Certificate Verify Independently
    Builder / colonizer company registration certificate. Confirms the promoter entity is a registered firm, company, or society.
  • Approved Building / Sanction Plan Verify Independently
    Building plan sanctioned by the local authority. Verify floor count, setbacks, and FSI compliance.
  • Layout Plan Verify Independently
    Approved layout showing plot divisions, roads, open spaces, and common areas.
  • Title Deed / Ownership Proof Verify Independently
    Proof that the promoter legally owns the land. Verify via Sub-Registrar records.
  • Encumbrance Certificate Verify Independently
    Confirms the property is free from legal dues, mortgages, or liens. Obtain from Sub-Registrar office.
  • Land Use / Diversion Certificate Verify Independently
    Required if land was converted from agricultural to non-agricultural use.
  • Architect Certificate Available
    Certification from a registered architect confirming structural plans and compliance.
    View View View +7 more
  • Structural Engineer Certificate Available
    Certification from a structural engineer confirming building safety and load-bearing capacity.
    View View View +7 more
  • CA Financial Certificate Available
    Chartered Accountant certificate on financial status, project cost estimates, and fund utilization.
    View View View +9 more
  • Commencement Certificate Available
    Permission to begin construction issued by the local authority after plan approval.
    Download Download Download +1 more
  • NOCs (No Objection Certificates) Verify Independently
    NOCs from fire department, environment, water supply, electricity board, and other authorities.
  • Project Brochure / Specification Available
    Official brochure with unit types, amenities, and specifications. Compare with actual delivery.
    View View View +9 more
  • RERA Compliance Orders Available
    Check if any orders, penalties, or directions have been issued against this project by RERA.
    1 order(s) on record — review in Legal tab
Disclaimer: This checklist is for informational purposes only. "Available" means Seemankan has a copy from the RERA portal — it does not constitute legal verification. Always verify original documents with the concerned authorities and consult a legal advisor before making a purchase decision.

Risk Zone Within 5 km

Buffer zones (water bodies, airport restrictions) and risk sites (landfills, waste processing) detected within 3 km (immediate) and 5 km (extended) of the project.

30
Risk zones (within 5 km)
3 km: 15 3–5 km: 15
28
Water bodies (river/nala/lake)
3 km: 15 3–5 km: 13
2
Landfill / waste sites
3 km: 0 3–5 km: 2
0
Airport buffer overlap
3 km: 0 3–5 km: 0
Risk Zone Map (3 km & 5 km rings) Project marker centered
Water Bodies (28)
  • Kankali Talab ≤3 km
    Tank · 50m buffer
    0.25 km
  • Amanaka Talab ≤3 km
    Tank · 50m buffer
    0.69 km
  • Devpuri Nala ≤3 km
    Nala · 20m buffer
    1.01 km
  • Budha Talab (Vivekananda Sarovar) ≤3 km
    Lake · 50m buffer
    1.44 km
  • Maharajband Talab ≤3 km
    Tank · 50m buffer
    1.63 km
  • Bhatagaon Nala ≤3 km
    Nala · 20m buffer
    1.65 km
  • Shankar Nagar Nala ≤3 km
    Nala · 20m buffer
    1.88 km
  • Pandri Talab ≤3 km
    Tank · 50m buffer
    2.14 km
Landfill / Waste Sites (2)
  • SLRM Centre Tendua (Tundra) 3–5 km
    Waste processing · 200m buffer
    4.19 km
  • Gudhiyari Old Dump Site 3–5 km
    Legacy dump · 500m buffer
    4.87 km

Documents

RERA-filed documents and disclosures available for this project.

RERA Documents (153)
AMOUNT (33)
View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View
APARTMENTPHOTO (72)
View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View
ARCH (10)
View View View View View View View View View View
BOROUCHRE (12)
View View View View View View View View View View View View
CA (12)
View View View View View View View View View View View View
COM (4)
Download Download Download Download
ENGG (10)
View View View View View View View View View View

Reviews

Verified buyer reviews and ratings for this project.

No reviews yet. Be the first to review this project!

Login to Write a Review

You need to be signed in to submit a review for this project.

Login or Register

Log in to see the full page

This page shows a preview. Sign in (or create a free account) to unlock the full content, charts, and downloads.

Log in Create account