You're viewing a preview. Log in or create a free account to see the full page.
RealEstateIQTM
IN हिन्दी
Login Sign Up Free
Want a full project intelligence report? Download a detailed PDF report — RERA compliance, promoter, financials, amenities, location & risk.
Generate Project Report
Home / RERA Projects / MERLIN JAYSHREE VIHAR (PHASE-II)
ONGOING Residential Development RERA Page Project Website
GENERATE REPORT

MERLIN JAYSHREE VIHAR (PHASE-II)

Compliance Status
Partial Compliance
21.2616, 81.6549 Explore area
District
Raipur
Area
—
Promoter
M/S JAI SHREE BUILDERS
Project Information
Promoter M/S JAI SHREE BUILDERS
Type Residential Development
Status Ongoing
Completion 30 Apr 2026
RERA No. PCGRERA220618000287
Registered 22 Jun 2018
Original End 31 Jul 2022
Total Units 24 · 4 sold
EWS Category NO
Construction Cost ₹ 154183000
Land Cost ₹ 11850000
Authorised Person ravi jain
Website www.jayshreebuilder.com
Address village- pandri tarai, raipur (c.g.)
At a Glance
24
Total Units
4
Units Sold
18
Unsold
2
Legal Cases
Apr 2026
Target Completion
75%
Completion
Amenities & Facilities (14)
BOUNDARY WALL
100%
COMMUNITY BUILDINGS
100%
FIRE PROTECTION AND FIRE SAFETY REQUIREMENTS
100%
INTERNAL ROADS AND FOOTPATHS
100%
LANDSCAPING AND TREE PLANTING
70%
PLACE OF WORSHIP
60%
SECURITY SERVICE
50%
SEWERAGE
70%
SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT AND DISPOSAL
40%
STORM WATER DRAINS
55%
STREET LIGHTING
0%
TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL OF SEWERAGE AND SULLAGE WAT
45%
WATER CONSERVATION RAIN WATER HARVESTING
75%
WATER SUPPLY
95%
Project Professionals
ANKITA AGRAWAL
STATUTORY CA
MAYANK SARAF
QUARTERLY CA
VIVEK KUMAR PANDEY
ENGINEER
YASH DIDWANIA
ARCHITECT
Project Analysis

360° Project Intelligence

Comprehensive analysis across regulatory, livability, market, filing activity, and market readiness dimensions.

Regulatory
64
9 of 14 checks · Moderate Signals
Livability
66
Avanti Bai Chowk · Moderate Signals
Legal
2
2 legal order(s) · 30 nearby
Filing Activity
477
384 docs · 93 quarterly updates
Market Readiness
17
Ongoing · due Apr 2026
Area Livability

Livability of Avanti Bai Chowk

Eighteen environmental, infrastructure and amenity parameters for the nearest mapped area (Avanti Bai Chowk — 0.27 km from this project). Click any parameter for the underlying readings, thresholds and what they mean.



🏠 Livability Parameters

Latest readings for Avanti Bai Chowk. Only parameters with available data are shown below. Based on the latest readings for Avanti Bai Chowk.

B
Composite Score
65.5 /100
Good

🌬️ Air Quality

Final Score: 91.6/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Air Quality?AQI summarizes PM2.5, PM10 and gases. Lower pollution values improve public health outcomes.
AQI
71
Satisfactory
PM2.5
26.3 µg/m³
≤ 40
PM10
52.3 µg/m³
≤ 60
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
PM2.5 26.3 µg/m³ ≤ 40
Good
PM10 52.3 µg/m³ ≤ 60
Good
NO₂ 24.2 µg/m³ ≤ 40
Good
💡 What does this mean for you?Cleaner air lowers respiratory burden and improves outdoor comfort.

💧 Water Quality

Final Score: 67.6/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Water Quality?Water quality combines chemistry, supply duration and contamination markers.
TDS
340 ppm
≤ 500
pH
7.59
6.5–8.5
Supply
6.8 hr/day
≥ 8 hr
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
TDS 340 ppm ≤ 500
Good
Fluoride 0.59 mg/L ≤ 1.0
Good
Turbidity 5.3 NTU ≤ 1
Concern
💡 What does this mean for you?Better supply quality and consistency reduces dependence on tanker/groundwater fallback.

🧹 Sanitation

Final Score: 54.9/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Sanitation?Sanitation reflects ODF status, sewage treatment and waste management regularity.
ODF
ODF+
ODF++
Sewage Coverage
38%
≥ 80%
Drainage
50%
≥ 90%
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
ODF Status ODF+ ODF++
Info
Sewage Coverage 38% ≥ 80%
Concern
Drainage Coverage 50% ≥ 90%
Concern
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher sanitation maturity lowers disease exposure and neighborhood nuisance.

🛣️ Infrastructure

Final Score: 80.9/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Infrastructure?Infrastructure score combines land use, urbanization, built form, night lights and terrain indicators.
Built-up
68.7%
Balanced band
Tree Cover
16.1%
≥ 15%
Urbanization
100.0
Higher better
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Built-up (LULC) 68.7% 40-70%
Contextual
Impervious Surface 35.7% < 70%
Good
NDVI Mean 0.260 > 0.3
Concern
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Built-up (LULC) % 76.0% 61.5% 68.7%
Tree Cover % 10.7% 21.5% 16.1%
Urbanization Index 100.0 100.0 100.0
Infra Score 79.3 82.5 81.5
💡 What does this mean for you?Balanced built + green mix usually improves long-term livability resilience.

🏥 Amenities

Final Score: 82.6/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Amenities?Amenity score captures daily-access services in walk/short-drive radii.
Hospitals 500m
2
Target ≥1
Schools 1km
6
Target ≥3
Parks 500m
1
Target ≥1
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Hospitals (500m) 2 ≥1
Good
Schools (1km) 6 ≥3
Good
Markets (1km) 6 ≥1
Good
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher local amenity density improves convenience and walkability.

🌳 Green Cover

Final Score: 36.5/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Green Cover?NDVI and vegetation structure are measured from satellite imagery to estimate neighborhood greenery.
NDVI Mean
0.224
Greenness index
Vegetation
24.3%
% green pixels
Dense Green
12.6%
Thick canopy
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
NDVI Mean 0.224 0.5 maps to score 100
Weighted 40%
Vegetation % 24.3% Direct % (cap 100)
Weighted 30%
Dense Green % 12.6% Scaled from 50%
Weighted 20%
Parks within 500m 1 Count * 33 (cap 100)
Weighted 10%
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
NDVI Mean 0.211 0.237 0.224
Vegetation % 26.8% 21.9% 24.3%
Dense Green % 6.0% 19.2% 12.6%
Tree Canopy % 11.7% 17.1% 14.4%
Green Score 30.6 36.5 33.6
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher green metrics typically reduce heat stress and improve comfort.

🔊 Noise

Final Score: 48.3/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Noise?Noise uses measured day/night dB compared to CPCB zone limits.
Day dB
56.1
vs CPCB day limit
Night dB
49.0
vs CPCB night limit
Zone
CPCB class
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Day Noise 56.1 dB ≤ 65.0 dB
Good
Night Noise 49.0 dB ≤ 55.0 dB
Good
Nearest Highway 1,165 m Higher usually quieter
Info
💡 What does this mean for you?Chronic high noise impacts stress, sleep quality and perceived comfort.

🌊 Flood Risk

Final Score: 45.0/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Flood Risk?Flood risk combines river exposure and local waterlogging vulnerability.
Overall Risk
High
Lower is safer
River Risk
Medium
Lower is safer
Waterlogging
High
Lower is safer
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Overall Risk High Low preferred
Info
River Flood Risk Medium Low preferred
Info
Waterlogging Risk High Low preferred
Info
💡 What does this mean for you?Lower flood risk means less disruption and lower hazard exposure.

🏚️ Earthquake Risk

Final Score: 75.0/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Earthquake Risk?Earthquake profile uses seismic zone, PGA and soil/liquefaction risk factors.
Seismic Zone
Zone II
Lower risk zone preferred
Risk Level
Low-Medium
Low preferred
Liquefaction
Low
Low preferred
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Seismic Zone Zone II II preferred
Info
Risk Level Low-Medium Low preferred
Info
PGA (475yr) 0.0155g Lower preferred
Info
💡 What does this mean for you?Lower seismic hazard reduces structural and insurance risk exposure.

🌡️ Land Surface Temp

Final Score: 62.1/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Land Surface Temp?Land Surface Temperature reflects heat-island intensity from satellite thermal bands.
LST Mean
29.5°C
Lower better
LST Min
7.9°C
Context
LST Max
39.8°C
Lower better
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
LST Mean 29.5°C 20°C best / 45°C worst
Weighted by formula
LST Score 62.1 0-100
Computed
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
LST Mean (°C) 29.4 29.5 29.5
LST Min (°C) 5.6 10.2 7.9
LST Max (°C) 39.9 39.6 39.8
LST Score 62.3 62.0 62.1
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher heat exposure affects comfort, cooling load and health risk.

🏗️ Built-up Density

Final Score: 31.3/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Built-up Density?Built-up density measures extent of developed surface versus open space.
Built-up %
68.7%
Lower better
Open Space %
31.3%
Higher better
Built-up Score
31.3
0-100
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Built-up % 68.7% Inverse scoring
Score = 100 - builtup%
Open Space % 31.3% Context
Info
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Built-up % 76.0% 61.5% 68.7%
Open Space % 24.0% 38.5% 31.3%
Built-up Score 24.0 38.5 31.3
💡 What does this mean for you?Very high built-up often raises heat and runoff while reducing open environmental buffers.

💡 Night-time Lights

Final Score: 49.2/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Night-time Lights?Nighttime lights are a proxy for economic activity and electrification intensity.
Avg Radiance
24.57
Higher better
Max Radiance
38.93
Context
NTL Score
49.1
0-100
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Avg Radiance 24.57 Scaled to 50
Score = min(100, avg/50*100)
NTL Score 49.1 0-100
Computed
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Avg Radiance 23.58 25.56 24.57
Max Radiance 37.16 40.69 38.93
NTL Score 47.2 51.1 49.1
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher radiance often indicates stronger urban activity but can correlate with light pollution.

🏞️ Water Bodies

Final Score: 100.0/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Water Bodies?Water-bodies score reflects permanent and seasonal water presence in the analysis radius.
Permanent Water
53.67%
Higher generally better
Seasonal Water
98.76%
Context
Water Score
100.0
0-100
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Permanent Water % 53.67% 70% weight
Scaled against 10%
Seasonal Water % 98.76% 30% weight
Scaled against 20%
Water Score 100.0 0-100
Computed
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Permanent Water % 37.66% 69.68% 53.67%
Seasonal Water % 99.48% 98.04% 98.76%
Water Score 100.0 100.0 100.0
💡 What does this mean for you?Water presence can support cooling, recharge and ecological quality.

👥 Population Density

Final Score: 65.3/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Population Density?Population density indicates urban crowding pressure around the area.
Population
97,664
Estimated residents
Density/km²
6,936.2
Lower better for this score
Score
65.3
0-100
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Density/km² 6,936.2 Inverse scale up to 20,000
Lower -> higher score
Score 65.3 0-100
Computed
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Population Total 24,614 170,713 97,664
Density / km² 7,834.7 6,037.7 6,936.2
Pop Density Score 60.8 69.8 65.3
💡 What does this mean for you?Extremely high density can increase pressure on services and mobility.

⛲ Groundwater

Final Score: 63.6/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Groundwater?Groundwater score combines moisture, recharge, drought and trend indicators.
Soil Moisture
133.697
Higher better
Recharge
1.89
Higher better
PDSI
3.07
Higher better
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Soil Moisture 133.697 30% weight
Scaled
Recharge 1.89 25% weight
Scaled
PDSI 3.07 20% weight
Scaled
SM Trend 0.0000 15% weight
Scaled
Precipitation 1,869.71 10% weight
Scaled
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Soil Moisture 133.432 133.962 133.697
Recharge Estimate 1.99 1.78 1.89
PDSI 3.08 3.06 3.07
Groundwater Score 63.6 63.7 63.6
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher score suggests better long-term aquifer and moisture support conditions.

🌧️ Waterlogging

↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Waterlogging?Waterlogging combines topography, imperviousness and wetness indices across nearby grid cells.
Grid Count
8
Sampled cells
Avg Susceptibility
54.1
Lower is safer
High Risk Grids
6
High / Very High
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTargetStatus
Avg Susceptibility 54.1 < 40
Concern
Avg Slope 2.81° > 1°
Good
Avg Impervious 63.1% < 70%
Good
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher susceptibility and low slope increase monsoon water stagnation probability.

🚶 Walkability & Safety

↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Walkability & Safety?OSM amenity metrics reflect pedestrian, safety and urban accessibility infrastructure.
Footpaths
0
Higher better
Street Lamps
0
Higher better
Police/Fire Access
1
Presence
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Footpaths (500m) 0 ≥ 3
Concern
Sidewalk Roads (1km) 0 ≥ 5
Concern
Nearest Police Station 1,626 m ≤ 2000m
Context
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher OSM accessibility/safety features generally improve everyday livability.

🌬️ Air Quality: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

💧 Water Quality: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🧹 Sanitation: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🛣️ Infrastructure: Infrastructure Score Formula

Formula: Composite weighted model from GHSL/ESA/VIIRS/Terrain features
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Urbanization index100.0020%SMOD
Built-up balance68.7%15%Best in moderate band
NTL stability70.0%15%Power/activity consistency
Avg building height8.35 m10%Vertical infra proxy
Impervious %35.7%10%Moderate is optimal
Radiance25.2210%Development proxy
Slope0.10°10%Flatter is better
Green support16.1%10%Tree + grass contribution
This is the same weighted structure used in Livability Infrastructure model.
Final: 81.50 / 100

🏥 Amenities: Amenity Score Breakdown

Formula: Each amenity category is capped at 100, final score is averaged across categories
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Hospitals 500m2 * 33Cap 100Health access
Schools 1km6 * 20Cap 100Education access
Markets 1km6 * 33Cap 100Daily needs
Parks 500m1 * 33Cap 100Open space
Transit 1km1 * 50Cap 100Mobility
Category multipliers mirror the Livability snapshot logic.
Final: Final from amenity_scores table

🌳 Green Cover: Green Score Formula

Formula: Score = (NDVI*40%) + (Vegetation*30%) + (Dense Green*20%) + (Parks*10%)
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
NDVI component0.224 => 44.840%17.9
Vegetation component24.3% => 24.330%7.3
Dense green component12.6% => 25.220%5.0
Parks component1 => 33.010%3.3
This matches the Livability GreenCover model weighting logic.
Final: 33.56 / 100

🔊 Noise: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🌊 Flood Risk: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🏚️ Earthquake Risk: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🌡️ Land Surface Temp: LST Score Formula

Formula: Score = ((45 - LST Mean) / 25) * 100, clipped to [0,100]
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
LST Mean29.47 °CReference20°C best, 45°C worst
Lower land surface temperature means better livability.
Final: 62.12 / 100

🏗️ Built-up Density: Built-up Score Formula

Formula: Score = 100 - Built-up %
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Built-up %68.7%InverseLower is better
Dense concrete surfaces reduce infiltration and increase heat islands.
Final: 31.26 / 100

💡 Night-time Lights: Night-time Lights Formula

Formula: Score = min(100, (Avg Radiance / 50) * 100)
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Avg Radiance24.57Scale 0-50Higher indicates activity
Higher night radiance generally tracks electrification and economic intensity.
Final: 49.14 / 100

🏞️ Water Bodies: Water Bodies Score Formula

Formula: Score = (Permanent Water Score * 70%) + (Seasonal Water Score * 30%)
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Permanent water53.67%70%Scaled against 10% benchmark
Seasonal water98.76%30%Scaled against 20% benchmark
Permanent water has higher score weight than seasonal water.
Final: 100.00 / 100

👥 Population Density: Population Density Formula

Formula: Score = ((20000 - density_per_km²) / 20000) * 100, clipped to [0,100]
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Density6,936.2 /km²Inverse scaleLower density -> higher score
This follows the Livability PopulationDensity model.
Final: 65.32 / 100

⛲ Groundwater: Groundwater Score Formula

Formula: Weighted: Soil Moisture 30% + Recharge 25% + PDSI 20% + Trend 15% + Precipitation 10%
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Soil moisture133.69730%Scaled to 0-200
Recharge estimate1.8925%Scaled -200 to +400
PDSI3.0720%Scaled -4 to +4
SM trend0.000015%Scaled -50 to +50
Precipitation1,869.7110%Scaled 800 to 1800
Exactly reused from Livability Groundwater model logic.
Final: 63.64 / 100

🌧️ Waterlogging: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🚶 Walkability & Safety: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

View full livability report for Avanti Bai Chowk →

Compliance Status

RERA registration, filings, and compliance flags based on public CG-RERA records.

Compliance Status Based on public CG-RERA records
2 Passed
2 Issue(s)
2 N/A
RERA Registration Active
Reg No. PCGRERA220618000287 — Status: Ongoing
Section 3 · Source · RERA Official Page
1 Penalty Order(s)
Complaints: M-COM-2021-01570
Sec 38–63 · Source · M-COM-2021-01570
No Recent Orders
No orders filed in the last 12 months (older: 2)
Source
Completion Overdue
Was due 30 Apr 2026 — overdue by ~1 month(s)
Section 4 · Source
Quarterly Updates Not Available
No compliance snapshot data on record
Section 11 · Source
Annual Audit Not Available
No compliance snapshot data on record
Section 4(2)(l)(D) · Source
Each check is based on publicly available CG-RERA portal data as of Jun 2026. How this works →

Details

Registration, professional team, bank, promoters, and compliance history.

Registration Details
RERA Number
PCGRERA220618000287
Status
Ongoing
Project Type
Residential Development
Approved Date
22 Jun 2018
Original End Date
31 Jul 2022
EWS Category
NO
Construction Cost
₹ 154183000
Land Cost
₹ 11850000
Proposed Completion
30 Apr 2026
Authorised Person
ravi jain
Website
www.jayshreebuilder.com
View on Map
Professional Team
RoleNameLicense / Membership
Statutory CA Ankita Agrawal 180201
Quarterly CA Mayank Saraf 177706
Engineer Vivek Kumar Pandey 315
Architect Yash Didwania CA/2018/98112
Promoters
M
M/S JAI SHREE BUILDERS
M
M/S JAYSHREE BUILDERS Partnership Firm
M
M/S JAYSHREE BUILDERS

Buildings & Units

Inventory overview, sold/unsold breakdown, and building details.

Inventory Overview
24
Total Inventory
4
Sold (17%)
18
Unsold (75%)
2
Mortgage (8%)
17%
75%
8%
Sold Unsold Mortgage
Quarterly Plot Updates
PeriodTotalSold (prev)Sold (qtr)RemainingMortgage
2026-01-01 – 2026-03-31 0 0 0 0 0
2025-10-01 – 2025-12-31 0 0 0 0 0
2025-07-01 – 2025-09-30 0 0 0 0 0
2025-04-01 – 2025-06-30 0 0 0 0 0
2025-01-01 – 2025-03-31 0 0 0 0 0
2024-10-01 – 2024-12-31 0 0 0 0 0
2024-07-01 – 2024-09-30 0 0 0 0 0
2024-04-01 – 2024-06-30 0 0 0 0 0
2024-01-01 – 2024-03-31 0 0 0 0 0
2023-10-01 – 2023-12-31 0 0 0 0 0
2023-07-01 – 2023-09-30 0 0 0 0 0
2023-04-01 – 2023-06-30 0 0 0 0 0
2023-01-01 – 2023-03-31 0 0 0 0 0
2022-10-01 – 2022-12-31 0 0 0 0 0
2022-07-01 – 2022-09-30 0 0 0 0 0
2022-04-01 – 2022-06-30 0 0 0 0 0
2022-01-01 – 2022-03-31 0 0 0 0 0
2021-10-01 – 2021-12-31 0 0 0 0 0
2021-07-01 – 2021-09-30 0 0 0 0 0
2021-04-01 – 2021-06-30 0 0 0 0 0
2021-01-01 – 2021-03-31 0 0 0 0 0
2020-10-01 – 2020-12-31 0 0 0 0 0
2020-07-01 – 2020-09-30 0 0 0 0 0
2020-04-01 – 2020-06-30 0 0 0 0 0
2020-01-01 – 2020-03-31 0 0 0 0 0
2019-10-01 – 2019-12-31 0 0 0 0 0
2019-07-01 – 2019-09-30 0 0 0 0 0
2019-04-01 – 2019-06-30 0 0 0 0 0
2019-01-01 – 2019-03-31 0 0 0 0 0
2018-10-01 – 2018-12-31 0 0 0 0 0
2018-06-22 – 2018-09-30 0 0 0 0 0
Quarterly Building Updates
PeriodTotalSold (prev)Sold (qtr)RemainingMortgage
2026-01-01 – 2026-03-31 0 0 0 0 0
2025-10-01 – 2025-12-31 0 0 0 0 0
2025-07-01 – 2025-09-30 0 0 0 0 0
2025-04-01 – 2025-06-30 0 0 0 0 0
2025-01-01 – 2025-03-31 0 0 0 0 0
2024-10-01 – 2024-12-31 0 0 0 0 0
2024-07-01 – 2024-09-30 0 0 0 0 0
2024-04-01 – 2024-06-30 0 0 0 0 0
2024-01-01 – 2024-03-31 0 0 0 0 0
2023-10-01 – 2023-12-31 0 0 0 0 0
2023-07-01 – 2023-09-30 0 0 0 0 0
2023-04-01 – 2023-06-30 0 0 0 0 0
2023-01-01 – 2023-03-31 0 0 0 0 0
2022-10-01 – 2022-12-31 0 0 0 0 0
2022-07-01 – 2022-09-30 0 0 0 0 0
2022-04-01 – 2022-06-30 0 0 0 0 0
2022-01-01 – 2022-03-31 0 0 0 0 0
2021-10-01 – 2021-12-31 0 0 0 0 0
2021-07-01 – 2021-09-30 0 0 0 0 0
2021-04-01 – 2021-06-30 0 0 0 0 0
2021-01-01 – 2021-03-31 0 0 0 0 0
2020-10-01 – 2020-12-31 0 0 0 0 0
2020-07-01 – 2020-09-30 0 0 0 0 0
2020-04-01 – 2020-06-30 0 0 0 0 0
2020-01-01 – 2020-03-31 0 0 0 0 0
2019-10-01 – 2019-12-31 0 0 0 0 0
2019-07-01 – 2019-09-30 0 0 0 0 0
2019-04-01 – 2019-06-30 0 0 0 0 0
2019-01-01 – 2019-03-31 0 0 0 0 0
2018-10-01 – 2018-12-31 0 0 0 0 0
2018-06-22 – 2018-09-30 0 0 0 0 0
Quarterly Apartment Updates
PeriodTotalSold (prev)Sold (qtr)RemainingMortgage
2026-01-01 – 2026-03-31 24 4 0 20 2
2025-10-01 – 2025-12-31 24 2 2 20 2
2025-07-01 – 2025-09-30 24 2 0 22 2
2025-04-01 – 2025-06-30 24 2 0 22 2
2025-01-01 – 2025-03-31 24 2 0 22 2
2024-10-01 – 2024-12-31 24 2 0 22 2
2024-07-01 – 2024-09-30 24 2 0 22 2
2024-04-01 – 2024-06-30 24 2 0 22 2
2024-01-01 – 2024-03-31 24 2 0 22 2
2023-10-01 – 2023-12-31 24 1 1 22 0
2023-07-01 – 2023-09-30 24 1 0 23 0
2023-04-01 – 2023-06-30 24 1 0 23 0
2023-01-01 – 2023-03-31 24 1 0 23 0
2022-10-01 – 2022-12-31 24 0 1 23 0
2022-07-01 – 2022-09-30 24 0 0 24 0
2022-04-01 – 2022-06-30 24 0 0 24 0
2022-01-01 – 2022-03-31 24 0 0 24 0
2021-10-01 – 2021-12-31 24 0 0 24 0
2021-07-01 – 2021-09-30 24 0 0 24 0
2021-04-01 – 2021-06-30 24 0 0 24 0
2021-01-01 – 2021-03-31 24 0 0 24 0
2020-10-01 – 2020-12-31 24 0 0 24 0
2020-07-01 – 2020-09-30 24 0 0 24 0
2020-04-01 – 2020-06-30 24 0 0 24 0
2020-01-01 – 2020-03-31 24 0 0 24 0
2019-10-01 – 2019-12-31 24 0 0 24 0
2019-07-01 – 2019-09-30 24 0 0 24 0
2019-04-01 – 2019-06-30 24 0 0 24 0
2019-01-01 – 2019-03-31 24 0 0 24 0
2018-10-01 – 2018-12-31 24 0 0 24 0
2018-06-22 – 2018-09-30 24 0 0 24 0

Legal Orders & Cases

RERA legal orders, complaints, and case statistics filed against this project.

2
Total Cases
0
Last 12 Months
2
Older Cases
2
PDFs Available
Legal Orders (2)
ComplaintApplicantSectionDateSourcePDF
M-COM-2021-01570 CG-RERA Section 37,Section 38 08 Jun 2022 This project
M-PRO-2018-00141 MERLIN JAYSHREE VIHAR RESIDENT WELFARE ASSOCIATION Section 3 28 Mar 2019 This project

Location

Project address, coordinates, and nearby places.

Location Details
Address
village- pandri tarai, raipur (c.g.)
District
Raipur
Tehsil
Raipur
Coordinates
21.2616391, 81.6548599 View on Map
Area Livability

Livability of Avanti Bai Chowk Raipur

Environmental, infrastructure & amenity parameters for the area where this project is located (0.27 km from project). Each value is compared with the Raipur average.

Composite Livability Score
65.5 / 100
Grade B · Good
-4.0 vs Raipur avg (69.5)
Air Quality
91.6 Excellent
Area
92
City
93
-0.9 vs city avg
Water Quality
67.6 Good
Area
68
City
68
-0.4 vs city avg
Sanitation
54.9 Average
Area
55
City
56
-1.1 vs city avg
Green Cover
36.5 Below Avg
Area
36
City
39
-2.0 vs city avg
Noise Level
48.3 Below Avg
Area
48
City
58
-10.0 vs city avg
Infrastructure
80.9 Excellent
Area
81
City
76
+5.2 vs city avg
Amenities
82.6 Excellent
Area
83
City
82
+0.6 vs city avg
Flood Safety
45.0 Below Avg
Area
45
City
62
-17.2 vs city avg
Earthquake Safety
75.0 Good
Area
75
City
86
-10.5 vs city avg
Land Surface Temp.
62.1 Average
Area
62
City
58
+4.3 vs city avg
Built-up Density
31.3 Poor
Area
31
City
36
-4.2 vs city avg
Night-light Activity
49.2 Below Avg
Area
49
City
54
-5.1 vs city avg
Water Bodies Nearby
100.0 Excellent
Area
100
City
93
+7.2 vs city avg
Population Density
65.3 Good
Area
65
City
68
-2.9 vs city avg
Groundwater Status
63.6 Average
Area
64
City
63
+0.2 vs city avg
View detailed livability report for Avanti Bai Chowk
Neighborhood Intelligence

Explore nearby infrastructure around this project. Toggle categories to show/hide on the map.

Neighborhood Map 3 km radius
RERA Projects Near merlin jayshree vihar (phase-ii) 30 found within 3 km
# Project District Status Distance
1 C.G. ELITE Raipur Ongoing 0.37 km
2 BRIGHT ENCLAVE Raipur Ongoing 0.43 km
3 SIMRAN HEIGHTS Raipur Ongoing 0.47 km
4 KAVISH ENCLAVE Raipur New 0.62 km
5 USHA ESTATES Raipur New 0.68 km
6 JEEVAN PARISAR Raipur Ongoing 0.74 km
7 OFFICE CUM RESIDENTIAL COMPLEX Raipur New 1.16 km
8 VIP KARISHMA-III-APARTMENTS Raipur Ongoing 1.50 km
9 ASHOKA IKON PHASE - 2 Raipur Ongoing 1.55 km
10 ASHOKA KOHINOOR PHASE - 2 Raipur Ongoing 1.63 km
11 high park phase- i Raipur New 1.72 km
12 LALGANGA MIDAS Raipur Ongoing 1.79 km
13 ASHOKA KOHINOOR PHASE-II Raipur New 1.80 km
14 high park phase - 2 Raipur New 1.83 km
15 A.T. CLASSIC Raipur Ongoing 1.86 km
16 HARSH HORIZON Raipur Ongoing 1.88 km
17 RAHEJA TOWER Raipur Ongoing 1.89 km
18 MAPPLE TREE Raipur Ongoing 1.91 km
19 DOLPHIN PREMIUM PLAZA Raipur Ongoing 1.91 km
20 ASHOKA ROYAL - C Raipur Ongoing 1.93 km
21 aishwarya market Raipur Ongoing 1.96 km
22 CHANDRA SQUARE Raipur Ongoing 2.06 km
23 GANPATI TOWER Raipur Ongoing 2.07 km
24 BANYAN TREE ENCLAVE Raipur Ongoing 2.08 km
25 EUPHORIA APARTMENT PHASE (II) Raipur Ongoing 2.10 km
26 EUPHORIA APARTMENT Raipur Ongoing 2.12 km
27 PITHALIA PLAZA Raipur Ongoing 2.16 km
28 ORRANGE HIVE Raipur Ongoing 2.18 km
29 ORRANGE COUNTY Raipur Ongoing 2.18 km
30 ASTHA LANDMARK Raipur New 2.21 km

Buyer Checklist

Documents and verifications a buyer should review before purchase.

Buyer Document Verification Checklist

Key documents a buyer should verify before purchasing in this project. Items marked Available have data on Seemankan.

10/14 verified
  • RERA Registration Certificate Available
    Confirms the project is registered with RERA CG. Verify registration number, validity dates, and project details on the RERA portal.
    RERA No: PCGRERA220618000287
    View on RERA Portal
  • Promoter Registration Certificate Available
    Builder / colonizer company registration certificate. Confirms the promoter entity is a registered firm, company, or society.
    Preview Preview
  • Approved Building / Sanction Plan Verify Independently
    Building plan sanctioned by the local authority. Verify floor count, setbacks, and FSI compliance.
  • Layout Plan Available
    Approved layout showing plot divisions, roads, open spaces, and common areas.
    Preview
  • Title Deed / Ownership Proof Available
    Proof that the promoter legally owns the land. Verify via Sub-Registrar records.
    Preview
  • Encumbrance Certificate Available
    Confirms the property is free from legal dues, mortgages, or liens. Obtain from Sub-Registrar office.
    Preview
  • Land Use / Diversion Certificate Verify Independently
    Required if land was converted from agricultural to non-agricultural use.
  • Architect Certificate Available
    Certification from a registered architect confirming structural plans and compliance.
    View View View +34 more
  • Structural Engineer Certificate Available
    Certification from a structural engineer confirming building safety and load-bearing capacity.
    View View View +34 more
  • CA Financial Certificate Available
    Chartered Accountant certificate on financial status, project cost estimates, and fund utilization.
    Preview View View +30 more
  • Commencement Certificate Verify Independently
    Permission to begin construction issued by the local authority after plan approval.
  • NOCs (No Objection Certificates) Verify Independently
    NOCs from fire department, environment, water supply, electricity board, and other authorities.
  • Project Brochure / Specification Available
    Official brochure with unit types, amenities, and specifications. Compare with actual delivery.
    View View View +31 more
  • RERA Compliance Orders Available
    Check if any orders, penalties, or directions have been issued against this project by RERA.
    2 order(s) on record — review in Legal tab
Disclaimer: This checklist is for informational purposes only. "Available" means Seemankan has a copy from the RERA portal — it does not constitute legal verification. Always verify original documents with the concerned authorities and consult a legal advisor before making a purchase decision.

Risk Zone Within 5 km

Buffer zones (water bodies, airport restrictions) and risk sites (landfills, waste processing) detected within 3 km (immediate) and 5 km (extended) of the project.

25
Risk zones (within 5 km)
3 km: 12 3–5 km: 13
23
Water bodies (river/nala/lake)
3 km: 11 3–5 km: 12
2
Landfill / waste sites
3 km: 1 3–5 km: 1
0
Airport buffer overlap
3 km: 0 3–5 km: 0
Risk Zone Map (3 km & 5 km rings) Project marker centered
Water Bodies (23)
  • Boriyakhurd Talab ≤3 km
    Tank · 50m buffer
    1 km
  • Kharun River ≤3 km
    River · 75m buffer
    1.29 km
  • Muktangan Talab ≤3 km
    Tank · 50m buffer
    2.02 km
  • Heerapur Talab ≤3 km
    Pond · 50m buffer
    2.21 km
  • Telibandha Nala ≤3 km
    Nala · 20m buffer
    2.41 km
  • Kharun Left Bank Canal ≤3 km
    Canal · 20m buffer
    2.43 km
  • Telibandha Talab (Marine Drive) ≤3 km
    Lake · 50m buffer
    2.55 km
  • Maharajband Talab ≤3 km
    Tank · 50m buffer
    2.59 km
Landfill / Waste Sites (2)
  • SLRM Centre Tendua (Tundra) ≤3 km
    Waste processing · 200m buffer
    1.39 km
  • Daldal Seoni MSW Transfer Station 3–5 km
    Transfer station · 100m buffer
    3.03 km

Documents

RERA-filed documents and disclosures available for this project.

RERA Documents (384)
AMOUNT (18)
View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View
APARTMENTPHOTO (205)
View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View
ARCH (37)
View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View
Ann19 (5)
View View View View View
BOROUCHRE (32)
View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View
BRIEF (1)
Preview
CA (33)
Preview View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View
COLONIZER (1)
Preview
ENGG (37)
View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View
ENUM (1)
Preview
FEESHEET (1)
Preview
LAYOUT (1)
Preview
PASSBOOK (1)
Preview
PHOTO (1)
Download
PSPEC (1)
Preview
Reg (1)
Preview
SEARCH (1)
Preview
SELF (1)
Preview
TAC (1)
Preview
other (5)
Preview Preview Preview Preview Preview

Reviews

Verified buyer reviews and ratings for this project.

No reviews yet. Be the first to review this project!

Login to Write a Review

You need to be signed in to submit a review for this project.

Login or Register

Log in to see the full page

This page shows a preview. Sign in (or create a free account) to unlock the full content, charts, and downloads.

Log in Create account