Eighteen environmental, infrastructure and amenity parameters for the nearest mapped area (Sankra — 0.57 km from this project). Click any parameter for the underlying readings, thresholds and what they mean.

🏠 Livability Parameters

Latest readings for Sankra. Only parameters with available data are shown below. Based on the latest readings for Sankra.

Composite Score

73.7 /100

Good

🌬️ Air Quality

Final Score: 100.0/100 ↑ Higher is Better

ℹ️ What is Air Quality?AQI summarizes PM2.5, PM10 and gases. Lower pollution values improve public health outcomes.

AQI

Good

PM2.5

19.7 µg/m³

≤ 40

PM10

58.9 µg/m³

≤ 60

Scoring Breakdown

Parameter	Value	Target / Rule	Status
PM2.5	19.7 µg/m³	≤ 40	Good
PM10	58.9 µg/m³	≤ 60	Good
NO₂	23.5 µg/m³	≤ 40	Good

💡 What does this mean for you?Cleaner air lowers respiratory burden and improves outdoor comfort.

💧 Water Quality

Final Score: 55.0/100 ↑ Higher is Better

ℹ️ What is Water Quality?Water quality combines chemistry, supply duration and contamination markers.

TDS

352 ppm

≤ 500

7.37

6.5–8.5

Supply

5.0 hr/day

≥ 8 hr

Scoring Breakdown

Parameter	Value	Target / Rule	Status
TDS	352 ppm	≤ 500	Good
Fluoride	0.68 mg/L	≤ 1.0	Good
Turbidity	5.9 NTU	≤ 1	Concern

💡 What does this mean for you?Better supply quality and consistency reduces dependence on tanker/groundwater fallback.

🧹 Sanitation

Final Score: 74.3/100 ↑ Higher is Better

ℹ️ What is Sanitation?Sanitation reflects ODF status, sewage treatment and waste management regularity.

ODF

ODF++

Sewage Coverage

69%

≥ 80%

Drainage

72%

≥ 90%

Scoring Breakdown

Parameter	Value	Target / Rule	Status
ODF Status	ODF++	ODF++	Info
Sewage Coverage	69%	≥ 80%	Concern
Drainage Coverage	72%	≥ 90%	Concern

💡 What does this mean for you?Higher sanitation maturity lowers disease exposure and neighborhood nuisance.

🛣️ Infrastructure

Final Score: 61.6/100 ↑ Higher is Better

ℹ️ What is Infrastructure?Infrastructure score combines land use, urbanization, built form, night lights and terrain indicators.

Built-up

16.3%

Balanced band

Tree Cover

18.0%

≥ 15%

Urbanization

35.6

Higher better

Scoring Breakdown

Parameter	Value	Target / Rule	Status
Built-up (LULC)	16.3%	40-70%	Contextual
Impervious Surface	23.6%	< 70%	Good
NDVI Mean	0.201	> 0.3	Concern

💡 What does this mean for you?Balanced built + green mix usually improves long-term livability resilience.

🏥 Amenities

Final Score: 65.9/100 ↑ Higher is Better

ℹ️ What is Amenities?Amenity score captures daily-access services in walk/short-drive radii.

Hospitals 500m

Target ≥1

Schools 1km

Target ≥3

Parks 500m

Target ≥1

Scoring Breakdown

Parameter	Value	Target / Rule	Status
Hospitals (500m)	0	≥1	Concern
Schools (1km)	5	≥3	Good
Markets (1km)	13	≥1	Good

💡 What does this mean for you?Higher local amenity density improves convenience and walkability.

🌳 Green Cover

Final Score: 69.9/100 ↑ Higher is Better

ℹ️ What is Green Cover?NDVI and vegetation structure are measured from satellite imagery to estimate neighborhood greenery.

NDVI Mean

0.373

Greenness index

Vegetation

66.4%

% green pixels

Dense Green

44.8%

Thick canopy

Scoring Breakdown

Parameter	Value	Target / Rule	Status
NDVI Mean	0.373	0.5 maps to score 100	Weighted 40%
Vegetation %	66.4%	Direct % (cap 100)	Weighted 30%
Dense Green %	44.8%	Scaled from 50%	Weighted 20%
Parks within 500m	1	Count * 33 (cap 100)	Weighted 10%

💡 What does this mean for you?Higher green metrics typically reduce heat stress and improve comfort.

🔊 Noise

Final Score: 76.0/100 ↑ Higher is Better

ℹ️ What is Noise?Noise uses measured day/night dB compared to CPCB zone limits.

Day dB

46.4

vs CPCB day limit

Night dB

38.4

vs CPCB night limit

Zone

residential

CPCB class

Scoring Breakdown

Parameter	Value	Target / Rule	Status
Day Noise	46.4 dB	≤ 55.0 dB	Good
Night Noise	38.4 dB	≤ 45.0 dB	Good
Nearest Highway	1,788 m	Higher usually quieter	Info

💡 What does this mean for you?Chronic high noise impacts stress, sleep quality and perceived comfort.

🌊 Flood Risk

Final Score: 73.6/100 ↑ Higher is Better

ℹ️ What is Flood Risk?Flood risk combines river exposure and local waterlogging vulnerability.

Overall Risk

Low

Lower is safer

River Risk

Low

Lower is safer

Waterlogging

Low

Lower is safer

Scoring Breakdown

Parameter	Value	Target / Rule	Status
Overall Risk	Low	Low preferred	Info
River Flood Risk	Low	Low preferred	Info
Waterlogging Risk	Low	Low preferred	Info

💡 What does this mean for you?Lower flood risk means less disruption and lower hazard exposure.

🏚️ Earthquake Risk

Final Score: 86.9/100 ↑ Higher is Better

ℹ️ What is Earthquake Risk?Earthquake profile uses seismic zone, PGA and soil/liquefaction risk factors.

Seismic Zone

Lower risk zone preferred

Risk Level

Low

Low preferred

Liquefaction

Low

Low preferred

Scoring Breakdown

Parameter	Value	Target / Rule	Status
Seismic Zone	II	II preferred	Info
Risk Level	Low	Low preferred	Info
PGA (475yr)	0.072	Lower preferred	Info

💡 What does this mean for you?Lower seismic hazard reduces structural and insurance risk exposure.

🌡️ Land Surface Temp

Final Score: 64.4/100 ↑ Higher is Better

ℹ️ What is Land Surface Temp?Land Surface Temperature reflects heat-island intensity from satellite thermal bands.

LST Mean

28.9°C

Lower better

LST Min

10.8°C

Context

LST Max

39.9°C

Lower better

Scoring Breakdown

Parameter	Value	Target / Rule	Status
LST Mean	28.9°C	20°C best / 45°C worst	Weighted by formula
LST Score	64.4	0-100	Computed

Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison

Parameter	1000m	3000m	Average (Final)
LST Mean (°C)	27.3	30.5	28.9
LST Min (°C)	9.8	11.7	10.8
LST Max (°C)	40.2	39.6	39.9
LST Score	70.8	58.1	64.4

💡 What does this mean for you?Higher heat exposure affects comfort, cooling load and health risk.

🏗️ Built-up Density

Final Score: 63.0/100 ↑ Higher is Better

ℹ️ What is Built-up Density?Built-up density measures extent of developed surface versus open space.

Built-up %

37.0%

Lower better

Open Space %

63.0%

Higher better

Built-up Score

63.0

0-100

Scoring Breakdown

Parameter	Value	Target / Rule	Status
Built-up %	37.0%	Inverse scoring	Score = 100 - builtup%
Open Space %	63.0%	Context	Info

Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison

Parameter	1000m	3000m	Average (Final)
Built-up %	33.7%	40.2%	37.0%
Open Space %	66.3%	59.8%	63.0%
Built-up Score	66.3	59.8	63.0

💡 What does this mean for you?Very high built-up often raises heat and runoff while reducing open environmental buffers.

💡 Night-time Lights

Final Score: 14.4/100 ↑ Higher is Better

ℹ️ What is Night-time Lights?Nighttime lights are a proxy for economic activity and electrification intensity.

Avg Radiance

7.18

Higher better

Max Radiance

18.53

Context

NTL Score

14.4

0-100

Scoring Breakdown

Parameter	Value	Target / Rule	Status
Avg Radiance	7.18	Scaled to 50	Score = min(100, avg/50*100)
NTL Score	14.4	0-100	Computed

Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison

Parameter	1000m	3000m	Average (Final)
Avg Radiance	10.16	4.20	7.18
Max Radiance	15.74	21.33	18.53
NTL Score	20.3	8.4	14.4

💡 What does this mean for you?Higher radiance often indicates stronger urban activity but can correlate with light pollution.

🏞️ Water Bodies

Final Score: 13.8/100 ↑ Higher is Better

ℹ️ What is Water Bodies?Water-bodies score reflects permanent and seasonal water presence in the analysis radius.

Permanent Water

3.95%

Higher generally better

Seasonal Water

72.39%

Context

Water Score

57.7

0-100

Scoring Breakdown

Parameter	Value	Target / Rule	Status
Permanent Water %	3.95%	70% weight	Scaled against 10%
Seasonal Water %	72.39%	30% weight	Scaled against 20%
Water Score	57.7	0-100	Computed

Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison

Parameter	1000m	3000m	Average (Final)
Permanent Water %	5.16%	2.73%	3.95%
Seasonal Water %	69.34%	75.43%	72.39%
Water Score	18.1	9.6	57.7

💡 What does this mean for you?Water presence can support cooling, recharge and ecological quality.

👥 Population Density

Final Score: 90.4/100 ↑ Higher is Better

ℹ️ What is Population Density?Population density indicates urban crowding pressure around the area.

Population

24,478

Estimated residents

Density/km²

1,913.8

Lower better for this score

Score

90.4

0-100

Scoring Breakdown

Parameter	Value	Target / Rule	Status
Density/km²	1,913.8	Inverse scale up to 20,000	Lower -> higher score
Score	90.4	0-100	Computed

Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison

Parameter	1000m	3000m	Average (Final)
Population Total	7,409	41,546	24,478
Density / km²	2,358.2	1,469.4	1,913.8
Pop Density Score	88.2	92.7	90.4

💡 What does this mean for you?Extremely high density can increase pressure on services and mobility.

⛲ Groundwater

Final Score: 61.8/100 ↑ Higher is Better

ℹ️ What is Groundwater?Groundwater score combines moisture, recharge, drought and trend indicators.

Soil Moisture

133.890

Higher better

Recharge

1.01

Higher better

PDSI

2.37

Higher better

Scoring Breakdown

Parameter	Value	Target / Rule	Status
Soil Moisture	133.890	30% weight	Scaled
Recharge	1.01	25% weight	Scaled
PDSI	2.37	20% weight	Scaled
SM Trend	-10.4198	15% weight	Scaled
Precipitation	1,580.11	10% weight	Scaled

Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison

Parameter	1000m	3000m	Average (Final)
Soil Moisture	142.532	125.248	133.890
Recharge Estimate	0.98	1.04	1.01
PDSI	2.06	2.69	2.37
Groundwater Score	61.9	61.8	58.1

💡 What does this mean for you?Higher score suggests better long-term aquifer and moisture support conditions.

🌧️ Waterlogging

↑ Higher is Better

ℹ️ What is Waterlogging?Waterlogging combines topography, imperviousness and wetness indices across nearby grid cells.

Grid Count

Sampled cells

Avg Susceptibility

53.4

Lower is safer

High Risk Grids

High / Very High

Scoring Breakdown

Parameter	Value	Target	Status
Avg Susceptibility	53.4	< 40	Concern
Avg Slope	2.41°	> 1°	Good
Avg Impervious	16.2%	< 70%	Good

💡 What does this mean for you?Higher susceptibility and low slope increase monsoon water stagnation probability.

🚶 Walkability & Safety

↑ Higher is Better

ℹ️ What is Walkability & Safety?OSM amenity metrics reflect pedestrian, safety and urban accessibility infrastructure.

Footpaths

Higher better

Street Lamps

Higher better

Police/Fire Access

Presence

Scoring Breakdown

Parameter	Value	Target / Rule	Status
Footpaths (500m)	1	≥ 3	Concern
Sidewalk Roads (1km)	2	≥ 5	Concern
Nearest Police Station	2,547 m	≤ 2000m	Context

💡 What does this mean for you?Higher OSM accessibility/safety features generally improve everyday livability.

⚠️ Risk Factors

↑ Higher is Better

ℹ️ What is Risk Factors?Nearby hazards and sensitive risk points mapped around this area.

Total Risks

Mapped points

Scoring Breakdown

Category	Risk	Distance / Severity	Meaning
Accessibility	No bus service	720 m / Medium	Area lacks regular public bus service
Air_pollution	NH traffic corridor	1035 m / Medium	National highway truck traffic emissions
Water_drainage	Open drainage channel	313 m / Low	Uncovered drainage near residential area
Infrastructure	Unpaved access road	1729 m / Low	Unmaintained kachha road section

💡 What does this mean for you?Closer and severe risks can affect insurance, resale and safety comfort.

🌬️ Air Quality: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.

Component	Value	Weight/Rule	Contribution
Source	area_scores (latest by score_date)	Pipeline	Weighted model in backend

Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.

Final: See card score

💧 Water Quality: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.

Component	Value	Weight/Rule	Contribution
Source	area_scores (latest by score_date)	Pipeline	Weighted model in backend

Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.

Final: See card score

🧹 Sanitation: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.

Component	Value	Weight/Rule	Contribution
Source	area_scores (latest by score_date)	Pipeline	Weighted model in backend

Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.

Final: See card score

🛣️ Infrastructure: Infrastructure Score Formula

Formula: Composite weighted model from GHSL/ESA/VIIRS/Terrain features

Component	Value	Weight/Rule	Contribution
Urbanization index	35.62	20%	SMOD
Built-up balance	16.3%	15%	Best in moderate band
NTL stability	49.8%	15%	Power/activity consistency
Avg building height	7.46 m	10%	Vertical infra proxy
Impervious %	23.6%	10%	Moderate is optimal
Radiance	10.04	10%	Development proxy
Slope	0.75°	10%	Flatter is better
Green support	18.0%	10%	Tree + grass contribution

This is the same weighted structure used in Livability Infrastructure model.

Final: 61.61 / 100

🏥 Amenities: Amenity Score Breakdown

Formula: Each amenity category is capped at 100, final score is averaged across categories

Component	Value	Weight/Rule	Contribution
Hospitals 500m	0 * 33	Cap 100	Health access
Schools 1km	5 * 20	Cap 100	Education access
Markets 1km	13 * 33	Cap 100	Daily needs
Parks 500m	0 * 33	Cap 100	Open space
Transit 1km	0 * 50	Cap 100	Mobility

Category multipliers mirror the Livability snapshot logic.

Final: Final from amenity_scores table

🌳 Green Cover: Green Score Formula

Formula: Score = (NDVI*40%) + (Vegetation*30%) + (Dense Green*20%) + (Parks*10%)

Component	Value	Weight/Rule	Contribution
NDVI component	0.373 => 74.6	40%	29.8
Vegetation component	66.4% => 66.4	30%	19.9
Dense green component	44.8% => 89.6	20%	17.9
Parks component	1 => 33.0	10%	3.3

This matches the Livability GreenCover model weighting logic.

Final: 70.98 / 100

🔊 Noise: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.

Component	Value	Weight/Rule	Contribution
Source	area_scores (latest by score_date)	Pipeline	Weighted model in backend

Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.

Final: See card score

🌊 Flood Risk: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.

Component	Value	Weight/Rule	Contribution
Source	area_scores (latest by score_date)	Pipeline	Weighted model in backend

Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.

Final: See card score

🏚️ Earthquake Risk: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.

Component	Value	Weight/Rule	Contribution
Source	area_scores (latest by score_date)	Pipeline	Weighted model in backend

Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.

Final: See card score

🌡️ Land Surface Temp: LST Score Formula

Formula: Score = ((45 - LST Mean) / 25) * 100, clipped to [0,100]

Component	Value	Weight/Rule	Contribution
LST Mean	28.89 °C	Reference	20°C best, 45°C worst

Lower land surface temperature means better livability.

Final: 64.44 / 100

🏗️ Built-up Density: Built-up Score Formula

Formula: Score = 100 - Built-up %

Component	Value	Weight/Rule	Contribution
Built-up %	37.0%	Inverse	Lower is better

Dense concrete surfaces reduce infiltration and increase heat islands.

Final: 63.02 / 100

💡 Night-time Lights: Night-time Lights Formula

Formula: Score = min(100, (Avg Radiance / 50) * 100)

Component	Value	Weight/Rule	Contribution
Avg Radiance	7.18	Scale 0-50	Higher indicates activity

Higher night radiance generally tracks electrification and economic intensity.

Final: 14.36 / 100

🏞️ Water Bodies: Water Bodies Score Formula

Formula: Score = (Permanent Water Score * 70%) + (Seasonal Water Score * 30%)

Component	Value	Weight/Rule	Contribution
Permanent water	3.95%	70%	Scaled against 10% benchmark
Seasonal water	72.39%	30%	Scaled against 20% benchmark

Permanent water has higher score weight than seasonal water.

Final: 57.65 / 100

👥 Population Density: Population Density Formula

Formula: Score = ((20000 - density_per_km²) / 20000) * 100, clipped to [0,100]

Component	Value	Weight/Rule	Contribution
Density	1,913.8 /km²	Inverse scale	Lower density -> higher score

This follows the Livability PopulationDensity model.

Final: 90.43 / 100

⛲ Groundwater: Groundwater Score Formula

Formula: Weighted: Soil Moisture 30% + Recharge 25% + PDSI 20% + Trend 15% + Precipitation 10%

Component	Value	Weight/Rule	Contribution
Soil moisture	133.890	30%	Scaled to 0-200
Recharge estimate	1.01	25%	Scaled -200 to +400
PDSI	2.37	20%	Scaled -4 to +4
SM trend	-10.4198	15%	Scaled -50 to +50
Precipitation	1,580.11	10%	Scaled 800 to 1800

Exactly reused from Livability Groundwater model logic.

Final: 58.13 / 100

🌧️ Waterlogging: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.

Component	Value	Weight/Rule	Contribution
Source	area_scores (latest by score_date)	Pipeline	Weighted model in backend

Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.

Final: See card score

🚶 Walkability & Safety: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.

Component	Value	Weight/Rule	Contribution
Source	area_scores (latest by score_date)	Pipeline	Weighted model in backend

Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.

Final: See card score

⚠️ Risk Factors: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.

Component	Value	Weight/Rule	Contribution
Source	area_scores (latest by score_date)	Pipeline	Weighted model in backend

Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.

Final: See card score

View full livability report for Sankra →

Compliance Status

RERA registration, filings, and compliance flags based on public CG-RERA records.

Compliance Status Based on public CG-RERA records

4 Passed

2 N/A

RERA Registration Active

Reg No. PCGRERA020319000930 — Status: New

Section 3 · Source · RERA Official Page

No RERA Orders

No complaints or orders found against this project

Sec 38–63 · Source

No Orders in Last 12 Months

Clean record — no complaints or orders filed

Source

Within Timeline

Target completion: 30 Jun 2026

Section 4 · Source

Quarterly Updates Not Available

No compliance snapshot data on record

Section 11 · Source

Annual Audit Not Available

No compliance snapshot data on record

Section 4(2)(l)(D) · Source

Each check is based on publicly available CG-RERA portal data as of May 2026. How this works →

Other Projects by Same Promoter (11)

Project	RERA No.	Status	District	Type
atal vihar yojna parsada kumhari	PCGRERA090818000671	Ongoing	Durg	Residential Development
COMPOSITE HOUSING SCHEME CHARODA	PCGRERA090818000684	Ongoing	Durg	Residential Development
COMPOSITE HOUSING SCHEME KHARUN GREENS KUMHARI	PCGRERA200918000774	Ongoing	Durg	Residential Development
construction of 18 mig, 133 mig, 63 ews houses & 14 commercial shop at selud patan ,dist - durg	PCGRERA291222001576	New	Durg	Residential Development
CONSTRUCTION OF 18 SRHIG, 41 HIG, 96 MIG, 196 LIG, 95 EWS HOUSES (446 HOUSES), 36 UTILITY SHOP, 14 K	PCGRERA110923001670	New	Durg	Residential Development
CONSTRUCTION OF 44 JRMIG, 47 EWS HOUSES (PHASE II) AT BAGHERA DURG DIST. DURG	PCGRERA271021001289	New	Durg	Residential Development
Construction of Commercial Shops and Residential House at Talpuri Block-B, Durg	PCGRERA221125002002	New	Durg	Residential Development
contruction of 16 mig,69 lig a,86 lig b, 55 ews for rajiv nagar awas yojna at murmunda ,durg	PCGRERA300322001376	New	Durg	Residential Development
SELF FINANCE SCHEME FOR CONSTRUCTION OF COMMERCIAL CUM RESIDENTIAL COMPLEX AT RUABANDHA TALPURI BLOC	PCGRERA200125001872	New	Durg	Mixed Development
twincity talpuri	PCGRERA300618000403	Ongoing	Durg	Residential Development
TWINCITY TALPURI, BLOCK-C	PCGRERA120319000937	New	Durg	Mixed Development

Details

Registration, professional team, bank, promoters, and compliance history.

Registration Details

RERA Number: PCGRERA020319000930
Status: New
Project Type: Mixed Development

EWS Category: NO
Proposed Completion: 30 Jun 2026
Authorised Person: EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
Website: www.cghb.gov.in

View on Map

Promoters

CHHATTISGARH HOUSING BOARD division-DURG Government/Semi Government Agency

CHHATTISGARH HOUSING BOARD DIVISION-DURG, THRU-VINOD GAHARWAR Government/Semi Government Agency

Buildings & Units

Inventory overview, sold/unsold breakdown, and building details.

No unit data available yet.
Run the RERA detail scraper to populate this section.

Legal Orders & Cases

RERA legal orders, complaints, and case statistics filed against this project.

Legal Orders (0)

Complaint	Applicant	Section	Date	Source	PDF
No orders found for this project.

Location

Project address, coordinates, and nearby places.

Location Details

Address: village - sankara, patan, durg (c.g.)
District: Durg
Tehsil: Patan
Coordinates: 21.2040664, 81.5774359 View on Map

Area Livability

Livability of Sankra Amleshwar

Environmental, infrastructure & amenity parameters for the area where this project is located (0.57 km from project). Each value is compared with the Amleshwar average.

Composite Livability Score

73.7 / 100

Grade B · Good

+3.6 vs Amleshwar avg (70.1)

Air Quality

100.0 Excellent

Area

100

City

100

+0.2 vs city avg

Water Quality

55.0 Average

Area

City

-1.0 vs city avg

Sanitation

74.3 Good

Area

City

+4.4 vs city avg

Green Cover

69.9 Good

Area

City

+1.5 vs city avg

Noise Level

76.0 Good

Area

City

-1.3 vs city avg

Infrastructure

61.6 Average

Area

City

+10.2 vs city avg

Amenities

65.9 Good

Area

City

+5.3 vs city avg

Flood Safety

73.6 Good

Area

City

+7.1 vs city avg

Earthquake Safety

86.9 Excellent

Area

City

+5.9 vs city avg

Land Surface Temp.

64.4 Average

Area

City

+0.6 vs city avg

Built-up Density

63.0 Average

Area

City

-2.9 vs city avg

Night-light Activity

14.4 Poor

Area

City

-3.4 vs city avg

Water Bodies Nearby

13.8 Poor

Area

City

-24.3 vs city avg

Population Density

90.4 Excellent

Area

City

-0.5 vs city avg

Groundwater Status

61.8 Average

Area

City

-2.3 vs city avg

View detailed livability report for Sankra

Neighborhood Intelligence

Explore nearby infrastructure around this project. Toggle categories to show/hide on the map.

Neighborhood Map 3 km radius

RERA Projects Near atal vihar yojna sankara 28 found within 3 km

#	Project	District	Status	Distance
1	HARSHIT NEO CITY	Durg	Ongoing	0.91 km
2	GREENEARTH CITY PHASE 3	Durg	Ongoing	0.95 km
3	ZENITH RESIDENCY	Durg	Ongoing	1.01 km
4	GREENEARTH CITY PHASE- 2	Durg	Ongoing	1.03 km
5	GREENEARTH CITY PHASE 4	Durg	Ongoing	1.11 km
6	EMERALD HOMES (AKS WORLD CITY)	Durg	Ongoing	1.12 km
7	GREENEARTH CITY AVENUE	Durg	New	1.23 km
8	AKS SMART CITY	Durg	Ongoing	1.25 km
9	VILLA CALIFORNIA	Durg	Ongoing	1.48 km
10	WALLFORT VIHAR	Durg	Ongoing	1.77 km
11	AASHA PRIDE CITY	Durg	New	1.81 km
12	maruti infra city phase- ii	Durg	Ongoing	2.10 km
13	KRISHNA SATTVAM PHASE 01	Raipur	New	2.12 km
14	MARUTI INFRAA CITY PHASE - 2	Durg	New	2.16 km
15	7 WONDER CITY	Durg	New	2.18 km
16	maruti 7 wonder city	Durg	New	2.26 km
17	GOKULDHAM RESIDENCY	Raipur	Ongoing	2.32 km
18	DREAM CITY	Dhamtari	New	2.37 km
19	MARUTI INFRAA CITY 3	Durg	New	2.37 km
20	admire green phase- 1	Raipur	New	2.43 km
21	SHRI SAI CITY (PHASE-3)	Durg	Ongoing	2.71 km
22	SHRI SAI CITY ( PHASE -2)	Durg	Ongoing	2.72 km
23	SHRI SAI CITY (PHASE-1)	Durg	Ongoing	2.74 km
24	SANTI ENCLAVE	Raipur	Ongoing	2.75 km
25	vinayak city extension-2	Raipur	New	2.81 km
26	vinayak city extension-3	Raipur	New	2.84 km
27	MANJEET SMART HOMES	Raipur	New	2.95 km
28	LAS VISTA, PHASE - II	Raipur	Ongoing	2.97 km

Buyer Checklist

Documents and verifications a buyer should review before purchase.

Buyer Document Verification Checklist

Key documents a buyer should verify before purchasing in this project. Items marked Available have data on Seemankan.

1/14 verified

RERA Registration Certificate Available

Confirms the project is registered with RERA CG. Verify registration number, validity dates, and project details on the RERA portal.

RERA No: PCGRERA020319000930

View on RERA Portal
Promoter Registration Certificate Verify Independently

Builder / colonizer company registration certificate. Confirms the promoter entity is a registered firm, company, or society.
Approved Building / Sanction Plan Verify Independently

Building plan sanctioned by the local authority. Verify floor count, setbacks, and FSI compliance.
Layout Plan Verify Independently

Approved layout showing plot divisions, roads, open spaces, and common areas.
Title Deed / Ownership Proof Verify Independently

Proof that the promoter legally owns the land. Verify via Sub-Registrar records.
Encumbrance Certificate Verify Independently

Confirms the property is free from legal dues, mortgages, or liens. Obtain from Sub-Registrar office.
Land Use / Diversion Certificate Verify Independently

Required if land was converted from agricultural to non-agricultural use.
Architect Certificate Verify Independently

Certification from a registered architect confirming structural plans and compliance.
Structural Engineer Certificate Verify Independently

Certification from a structural engineer confirming building safety and load-bearing capacity.
CA Financial Certificate Verify Independently

Chartered Accountant certificate on financial status, project cost estimates, and fund utilization.
Commencement Certificate Verify Independently

Permission to begin construction issued by the local authority after plan approval.
NOCs (No Objection Certificates) Verify Independently

NOCs from fire department, environment, water supply, electricity board, and other authorities.
Project Brochure / Specification Verify Independently

Official brochure with unit types, amenities, and specifications. Compare with actual delivery.
RERA Compliance Orders Verify Independently

Check if any orders, penalties, or directions have been issued against this project by RERA.

Risk Zone Within 5 km

Buffer zones (water bodies, airport restrictions) and risk sites (landfills, waste processing) detected within 3 km (immediate) and 5 km (extended) of the project.

Risk zones (within 5 km)

3 km: 1 3–5 km: 5

Water bodies (river/nala/lake)

3 km: 1 3–5 km: 3

Landfill / waste sites

3 km: 0 3–5 km: 2

Airport buffer overlap

3 km: 0 3–5 km: 0

Risk Zone Map (3 km & 5 km rings) Project marker centered

Water Bodies (4)

Urla Talab ≤3 km

Tank · 50m buffer

1.2 km
Gudhiyari Nala 3–5 km

Nala · 20m buffer

3.59 km
Dumartarai Reservoir 3–5 km

Reservoir · 75m buffer

3.72 km
Kharun Right Bank Canal 3–5 km

Canal · 20m buffer

4.44 km

Landfill / Waste Sites (2)

Bhanpuri-Rawabhata Legacy Dump 3–5 km

Legacy dump · 500m buffer

3.89 km
Old Raipur Trenching Ground 3–5 km

Inactive landfill · 500m buffer

4.73 km

Reviews

Verified buyer reviews and ratings for this project.

No reviews yet. Be the first to review this project!

Login to Write a Review

You need to be signed in to submit a review for this project.