Home / RERA Projects / ADMIRE GREEN PHASE- 1
NEW Residential Plotted Development RERA Page Project Website

ADMIRE GREEN PHASE- 1

Compliance Status
Compliant
21.2196, 81.5940 Explore area
District
Raipur
Area
Promoter
M/S ADMIRE INFRAZONE PVT.LTD
Project Information
Promoter M/S ADMIRE INFRAZONE PVT.LTD
Type Residential Plotted Development
Status New
Completion 20 May 2026
Registered 24 Dec 2020
Original End 20 Feb 2024
Total Units 108 · 5 sold
EWS Category NO
Construction Cost ₹ 27746000
Land Cost ₹ 14182000
Authorised Person dilip kumar pahuja
Address VILLAGE- SEJBAHAR ,TEHSIL- RAIPUR ,DIST- RAIPUR
At a Glance
108
Total Units
5
Units Sold
103
Unsold
3
Legal Cases
May 2026
Target Completion
69%
Completion
Amenities & Facilities (8)
BOUNDARY WALL
75%
INTERNAL ROADS AND FOOTPATHS
85%
LANDSCAPING AND TREE PLANTING
50%
OPEN PARKING
45%
SEWERAGE
85%
STORM WATER DRAINS
70%
STREET LIGHTING
50%
WATER SUPPLY
70%
Project Professionals
MANISH SETPAL
STATUTORY CA
VINOD MAKHIJA
QUARTERLY CA
ROHAN KUMAR GUPTA
ENGINEER
KRITI NATHANI
ARCHITECT
Project Analysis

360° Project Intelligence

Comprehensive analysis across regulatory, livability, market, filing activity, and market readiness dimensions.

Area Livability

Livability of Khursipar

Eighteen environmental, infrastructure and amenity parameters for the nearest mapped area (Khursipar — 1.04 km from this project). Click any parameter for the underlying readings, thresholds and what they mean.



🏠 Livability Parameters

Latest readings for Khursipar. Only parameters with available data are shown below. Based on the latest readings for Khursipar.

C
Composite Score
58.5 /100
Average

🌬️ Air Quality

Final Score: 88.4/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Air Quality?AQI summarizes PM2.5, PM10 and gases. Lower pollution values improve public health outcomes.
AQI
79
Satisfactory
PM2.5
24.1 µg/m³
≤ 40
PM10
218.1 µg/m³
≤ 60
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
PM2.5 24.1 µg/m³ ≤ 40
Good
PM10 218.1 µg/m³ ≤ 60
Concern
NO₂ 22.8 µg/m³ ≤ 40
Good
💡 What does this mean for you?Cleaner air lowers respiratory burden and improves outdoor comfort.

💧 Water Quality

Final Score: 55.6/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Water Quality?Water quality combines chemistry, supply duration and contamination markers.
TDS
451 ppm
≤ 500
pH
7.12
6.5–8.5
Supply
5.1 hr/day
≥ 8 hr
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
TDS 451 ppm ≤ 500
Good
Fluoride 1.14 mg/L ≤ 1.0
Concern
Turbidity 6.1 NTU ≤ 1
Concern
💡 What does this mean for you?Better supply quality and consistency reduces dependence on tanker/groundwater fallback.

🧹 Sanitation

Final Score: 30.6/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Sanitation?Sanitation reflects ODF status, sewage treatment and waste management regularity.
ODF
ODF
ODF++
Sewage Coverage
22%
≥ 80%
Drainage
30%
≥ 90%
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
ODF Status ODF ODF++
Info
Sewage Coverage 22% ≥ 80%
Concern
Drainage Coverage 30% ≥ 90%
Concern
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher sanitation maturity lowers disease exposure and neighborhood nuisance.

🛣️ Infrastructure

Final Score: 72.4/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Infrastructure?Infrastructure score combines land use, urbanization, built form, night lights and terrain indicators.
Built-up
59.3%
Balanced band
Tree Cover
11.0%
≥ 15%
Urbanization
94.8
Higher better
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Built-up (LULC) 59.3% 40-70%
Contextual
Impervious Surface 38.5% < 70%
Good
NDVI Mean 0.250 > 0.3
Concern
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Built-up (LULC) % 74.3% 44.2% 59.3%
Tree Cover % 4.2% 17.7% 11.0%
Urbanization Index 100.0 89.7 94.8
Infra Score 74.5 70.2 77.6
💡 What does this mean for you?Balanced built + green mix usually improves long-term livability resilience.

🏥 Amenities

Final Score: 83.6/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Amenities?Amenity score captures daily-access services in walk/short-drive radii.
Hospitals 500m
7
Target ≥1
Schools 1km
1
Target ≥3
Parks 500m
4
Target ≥1
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Hospitals (500m) 7 ≥1
Good
Schools (1km) 1 ≥3
Concern
Markets (1km) 14 ≥1
Good
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher local amenity density improves convenience and walkability.

🌳 Green Cover

Final Score: 44.9/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Green Cover?NDVI and vegetation structure are measured from satellite imagery to estimate neighborhood greenery.
NDVI Mean
0.195
Greenness index
Vegetation
30.2%
% green pixels
Dense Green
11.7%
Thick canopy
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
NDVI Mean 0.195 0.5 maps to score 100
Weighted 40%
Vegetation % 30.2% Direct % (cap 100)
Weighted 30%
Dense Green % 11.7% Scaled from 50%
Weighted 20%
Parks within 500m 4 Count * 33 (cap 100)
Weighted 10%
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
NDVI Mean 0.156 0.234 0.195
Vegetation % 25.5% 34.9% 30.2%
Dense Green % 9.0% 14.3% 11.7%
Tree Canopy % 12.9% 16.2% 14.5%
Green Score 33.7 44.9 39.3
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher green metrics typically reduce heat stress and improve comfort.

🔊 Noise

Final Score: 92.7/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Noise?Noise uses measured day/night dB compared to CPCB zone limits.
Day dB
51.4
vs CPCB day limit
Night dB
50.9
vs CPCB night limit
Zone
CPCB class
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Day Noise 51.4 dB ≤ 55.0 dB
Good
Night Noise 50.9 dB ≤ 45.0 dB
Concern
Nearest Highway 923 m Higher usually quieter
Info
💡 What does this mean for you?Chronic high noise impacts stress, sleep quality and perceived comfort.

🌊 Flood Risk

Final Score: 40.0/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Flood Risk?Flood risk combines river exposure and local waterlogging vulnerability.
Overall Risk
Medium
Lower is safer
River Risk
Medium
Lower is safer
Waterlogging
Medium
Lower is safer
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Overall Risk Medium Low preferred
Info
River Flood Risk Medium Low preferred
Info
Waterlogging Risk Medium Low preferred
Info
💡 What does this mean for you?Lower flood risk means less disruption and lower hazard exposure.

🏚️ Earthquake Risk

Final Score: 10.0/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Earthquake Risk?Earthquake profile uses seismic zone, PGA and soil/liquefaction risk factors.
Seismic Zone
Zone II
Lower risk zone preferred
Risk Level
Low
Low preferred
Liquefaction
None
Low preferred
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Seismic Zone Zone II II preferred
Info
Risk Level Low Low preferred
Info
PGA (475yr) 0.0155g Lower preferred
Info
💡 What does this mean for you?Lower seismic hazard reduces structural and insurance risk exposure.

🌡️ Land Surface Temp

Final Score: 60.1/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Land Surface Temp?Land Surface Temperature reflects heat-island intensity from satellite thermal bands.
LST Mean
30.0°C
Lower better
LST Min
18.8°C
Context
LST Max
39.4°C
Lower better
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
LST Mean 30.0°C 20°C best / 45°C worst
Weighted by formula
LST Score 60.1 0-100
Computed
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
LST Mean (°C) 30.1 29.8 30.0
LST Min (°C) 19.3 18.4 18.8
LST Max (°C) 40.1 38.7 39.4
LST Score 59.6 60.7 60.1
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher heat exposure affects comfort, cooling load and health risk.

🏗️ Built-up Density

Final Score: 40.7/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Built-up Density?Built-up density measures extent of developed surface versus open space.
Built-up %
59.3%
Lower better
Open Space %
40.7%
Higher better
Built-up Score
40.7
0-100
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Built-up % 59.3% Inverse scoring
Score = 100 - builtup%
Open Space % 40.7% Context
Info
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Built-up % 74.3% 44.2% 59.3%
Open Space % 25.7% 55.8% 40.7%
Built-up Score 25.7 55.8 40.7
💡 What does this mean for you?Very high built-up often raises heat and runoff while reducing open environmental buffers.

💡 Night-time Lights

Final Score: 36.5/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Night-time Lights?Nighttime lights are a proxy for economic activity and electrification intensity.
Avg Radiance
18.25
Higher better
Max Radiance
27.14
Context
NTL Score
36.5
0-100
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Avg Radiance 18.25 Scaled to 50
Score = min(100, avg/50*100)
NTL Score 36.5 0-100
Computed
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Avg Radiance 19.87 16.63 18.25
Max Radiance 29.17 25.10 27.14
NTL Score 39.7 33.3 36.5
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher radiance often indicates stronger urban activity but can correlate with light pollution.

🏞️ Water Bodies

Final Score: 100.0/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Water Bodies?Water-bodies score reflects permanent and seasonal water presence in the analysis radius.
Permanent Water
52.89%
Higher generally better
Seasonal Water
92.66%
Context
Water Score
100.0
0-100
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Permanent Water % 52.89% 70% weight
Scaled against 10%
Seasonal Water % 92.66% 30% weight
Scaled against 20%
Water Score 100.0 0-100
Computed
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Permanent Water % 60.60% 45.17% 52.89%
Seasonal Water % 90.00% 95.32% 92.66%
Water Score 100.0 100.0 100.0
💡 What does this mean for you?Water presence can support cooling, recharge and ecological quality.

👥 Population Density

Final Score: 74.7/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Population Density?Population density indicates urban crowding pressure around the area.
Population
71,763
Estimated residents
Density/km²
5,068.8
Lower better for this score
Score
74.7
0-100
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Density/km² 5,068.8 Inverse scale up to 20,000
Lower -> higher score
Score 74.7 0-100
Computed
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Population Total 17,888 125,638 71,763
Density / km² 5,694.0 4,443.5 5,068.8
Pop Density Score 71.5 77.8 74.7
💡 What does this mean for you?Extremely high density can increase pressure on services and mobility.

Groundwater

Final Score: 62.9/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Groundwater?Groundwater score combines moisture, recharge, drought and trend indicators.
Soil Moisture
131.024
Higher better
Recharge
1.72
Higher better
PDSI
2.93
Higher better
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Soil Moisture 131.024 30% weight
Scaled
Recharge 1.72 25% weight
Scaled
PDSI 2.93 20% weight
Scaled
SM Trend 0.0000 15% weight
Scaled
Precipitation 1,875.30 10% weight
Scaled
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Soil Moisture 131.025 131.022 131.024
Recharge Estimate 1.60 1.84 1.72
PDSI 2.93 2.93 2.93
Groundwater Score 62.9 62.9 62.9
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher score suggests better long-term aquifer and moisture support conditions.

🌧️ Waterlogging

↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Waterlogging?Waterlogging combines topography, imperviousness and wetness indices across nearby grid cells.
Grid Count
257
Sampled cells
Avg Susceptibility
46.6
Lower is safer
High Risk Grids
66
High / Very High
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTargetStatus
Avg Susceptibility 46.6 < 40
Concern
Avg Slope 2.67° > 1°
Good
Avg Impervious 12.6% < 70%
Good
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher susceptibility and low slope increase monsoon water stagnation probability.

🚶 Walkability & Safety

↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Walkability & Safety?OSM amenity metrics reflect pedestrian, safety and urban accessibility infrastructure.
Footpaths
0
Higher better
Street Lamps
0
Higher better
Police/Fire Access
0
Presence
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Footpaths (500m) 0 ≥ 3
Concern
Sidewalk Roads (1km) 7 ≥ 5
Good
Nearest Police Station — m ≤ 2000m
Context
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher OSM accessibility/safety features generally improve everyday livability.

🌬️ Air Quality: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

💧 Water Quality: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🧹 Sanitation: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🛣️ Infrastructure: Infrastructure Score Formula

Formula: Composite weighted model from GHSL/ESA/VIIRS/Terrain features
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Urbanization index94.8420%SMOD
Built-up balance59.3%15%Best in moderate band
NTL stability70.0%15%Power/activity consistency
Avg building height6.31 m10%Vertical infra proxy
Impervious %38.5%10%Moderate is optimal
Radiance18.7310%Development proxy
Slope0.10°10%Flatter is better
Green support11.0%10%Tree + grass contribution
This is the same weighted structure used in Livability Infrastructure model.
Final: 77.56 / 100

🏥 Amenities: Amenity Score Breakdown

Formula: Each amenity category is capped at 100, final score is averaged across categories
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Hospitals 500m7 * 33Cap 100Health access
Schools 1km1 * 20Cap 100Education access
Markets 1km14 * 33Cap 100Daily needs
Parks 500m4 * 33Cap 100Open space
Transit 1km0 * 50Cap 100Mobility
Category multipliers mirror the Livability snapshot logic.
Final: Final from amenity_scores table

🌳 Green Cover: Green Score Formula

Formula: Score = (NDVI*40%) + (Vegetation*30%) + (Dense Green*20%) + (Parks*10%)
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
NDVI component0.195 => 39.040%15.6
Vegetation component30.2% => 30.230%9.1
Dense green component11.7% => 23.320%4.7
Parks component4 => 100.010%10.0
This matches the Livability GreenCover model weighting logic.
Final: 39.32 / 100

🔊 Noise: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🌊 Flood Risk: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🏚️ Earthquake Risk: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🌡️ Land Surface Temp: LST Score Formula

Formula: Score = ((45 - LST Mean) / 25) * 100, clipped to [0,100]
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
LST Mean29.97 °CReference20°C best, 45°C worst
Lower land surface temperature means better livability.
Final: 60.12 / 100

🏗️ Built-up Density: Built-up Score Formula

Formula: Score = 100 - Built-up %
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Built-up %59.3%InverseLower is better
Dense concrete surfaces reduce infiltration and increase heat islands.
Final: 40.74 / 100

💡 Night-time Lights: Night-time Lights Formula

Formula: Score = min(100, (Avg Radiance / 50) * 100)
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Avg Radiance18.25Scale 0-50Higher indicates activity
Higher night radiance generally tracks electrification and economic intensity.
Final: 36.51 / 100

🏞️ Water Bodies: Water Bodies Score Formula

Formula: Score = (Permanent Water Score * 70%) + (Seasonal Water Score * 30%)
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Permanent water52.89%70%Scaled against 10% benchmark
Seasonal water92.66%30%Scaled against 20% benchmark
Permanent water has higher score weight than seasonal water.
Final: 100.00 / 100

👥 Population Density: Population Density Formula

Formula: Score = ((20000 - density_per_km²) / 20000) * 100, clipped to [0,100]
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Density5,068.8 /km²Inverse scaleLower density -> higher score
This follows the Livability PopulationDensity model.
Final: 74.66 / 100

⛲ Groundwater: Groundwater Score Formula

Formula: Weighted: Soil Moisture 30% + Recharge 25% + PDSI 20% + Trend 15% + Precipitation 10%
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Soil moisture131.02430%Scaled to 0-200
Recharge estimate1.7225%Scaled -200 to +400
PDSI2.9320%Scaled -4 to +4
SM trend0.000015%Scaled -50 to +50
Precipitation1,875.3010%Scaled 800 to 1800
Exactly reused from Livability Groundwater model logic.
Final: 62.89 / 100

🌧️ Waterlogging: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🚶 Walkability & Safety: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

View full livability report for Khursipar →

Compliance Status

RERA registration, filings, and compliance flags based on public CG-RERA records.

Compliance Status Based on public CG-RERA records
3 Passed
1 Warning
2 N/A
RERA Registration Active
Reg No. PCGRERA241220001171 — Status: New
No Penalty Orders
3 order(s) on record, none with penalty sections (Sec 38/39/40/59/61/63)
Sec 38–63 · Source
1 Order(s) in Last 12 Months
Recent: M-PRO-2025-03238
Within Timeline
Target completion: 20 May 2026
Section 4 · Source
Quarterly Updates Not Available
No compliance snapshot data on record
Section 11 · Source
Annual Audit Not Available
No compliance snapshot data on record
Section 4(2)(l)(D) · Source
Each check is based on publicly available CG-RERA portal data as of Apr 2026. How this works →

Details

Registration, professional team, bank, promoters, and compliance history.

Registration Details
RERA Number
PCGRERA241220001171
Status
New
Project Type
Residential Plotted Development
Approved Date
24 Dec 2020
Original End Date
20 Feb 2024
EWS Category
NO
Construction Cost
₹ 27746000
Land Cost
₹ 14182000
Proposed Completion
20 May 2026
Authorised Person
dilip kumar pahuja
Website
www.admiregreen.in
Professional Team
RoleNameLicense / Membership
Statutory CA MANISH SETPAL 417767
Quarterly CA VINOD MAKHIJA 417929
Engineer ROHAN KUMAR GUPTA 702/2015
Architect KRITI NATHANI 1087/2019

Location

Project address, coordinates, and nearby places.

Location Details
Address
VILLAGE- SEJBAHAR ,TEHSIL- RAIPUR ,DIST- RAIPUR
District
Raipur
Tehsil
Raipur
Coordinates
21.2196043, 81.5939590 View on Map
Neighborhood Intelligence

Explore nearby infrastructure around this project. Toggle categories to show/hide on the map.

Neighborhood Map 3 km radius
RERA Projects Near admire green phase- 1 30 found within 3 km
# Project District Status Distance
1 DREAM CITY Dhamtari New 0.12 km
2 KRISHNA SATTVAM PHASE 01 Raipur New 0.38 km
3 GOKULDHAM RESIDENCY Raipur Ongoing 0.42 km
4 SANTI ENCLAVE Raipur Ongoing 0.56 km
5 MANJEET SMART HOMES Raipur New 0.75 km
6 vinayak city extension-2 Raipur New 0.97 km
7 vinayak city extension-3 Raipur New 1.00 km
8 vinayak city extension-1 Raipur New 1.13 km
9 VINAYAK CITY Raipur New 1.19 km
10 SHIVLOK HEIGHTS Raipur New 1.31 km
11 chhugani pride phase - 2 Raipur New 1.42 km
12 PMAY OF 319 (DUS) AT BHATAGAON ,RAIPUR Raipur Ongoing 1.43 km
13 HARSHIT URBAN CITY Raipur New 1.52 km
14 TDS-01 INDRAPRASTH PHASE -2 Raipur Ongoing 1.73 km
15 Vinayak Green Scape Raipur New 1.79 km
16 ASK GRANDIOSE Raipur New 1.80 km
17 NATURAL CITY PHASE II Raipur New 1.87 km
18 uttam city Raipur New 2.00 km
19 WHITEWOOD ITALIA Raipur Ongoing 2.00 km
20 chandra town Raipur Ongoing 2.18 km
21 wallfort heights phase -2 ( g,h,i,j,K,L ) Raipur New 2.20 km
22 PMAY OF 290 (dus) AT BHATAGAON ,RAIPUR Raipur Ongoing 2.20 km
23 GT UNI HOMES Raipur New 2.23 km
24 gt uni homes phase-2 Raipur New 2.24 km
25 wallfort heightS phase iii Raipur New 2.25 km
26 NATURAL CITY Raipur Ongoing 2.27 km
27 ask business triangle (abt) Raipur New 2.31 km
28 PIC heightS Raipur Ongoing 2.36 km
29 ASK PARADISE Raipur Ongoing 2.37 km
30 pragati pearl Raipur Ongoing 2.40 km

Buyer Checklist

Documents and verifications a buyer should review before purchase.

Buyer Document Verification Checklist

Key documents a buyer should verify before purchasing in this project. Items marked Available have data on Seemankan.

13/14 verified
  • RERA Registration Certificate Available
    Confirms the project is registered with RERA CG. Verify registration number, validity dates, and project details on the RERA portal.
    RERA No: PCGRERA241220001171
  • Promoter Registration Certificate Available
    Builder / colonizer company registration certificate. Confirms the promoter entity is a registered firm, company, or society.
  • Approved Building / Sanction Plan Available
    Building plan sanctioned by the local authority. Verify floor count, setbacks, and FSI compliance.
  • Layout Plan Available
    Approved layout showing plot divisions, roads, open spaces, and common areas.
  • Title Deed / Ownership Proof Available
    Proof that the promoter legally owns the land. Verify via Sub-Registrar records.
  • Encumbrance Certificate Available
    Confirms the property is free from legal dues, mortgages, or liens. Obtain from Sub-Registrar office.
  • Land Use / Diversion Certificate Available
    Required if land was converted from agricultural to non-agricultural use.
  • Architect Certificate Available
    Certification from a registered architect confirming structural plans and compliance.
  • Structural Engineer Certificate Available
    Certification from a structural engineer confirming building safety and load-bearing capacity.
  • CA Financial Certificate Available
    Chartered Accountant certificate on financial status, project cost estimates, and fund utilization.
  • Commencement Certificate Verify Independently
    Permission to begin construction issued by the local authority after plan approval.
  • NOCs (No Objection Certificates) Available
    NOCs from fire department, environment, water supply, electricity board, and other authorities.
  • Project Brochure / Specification Available
    Official brochure with unit types, amenities, and specifications. Compare with actual delivery.
  • RERA Compliance Orders Available
    Check if any orders, penalties, or directions have been issued against this project by RERA.
    3 order(s) on record — review in Legal tab

Risk Zone Within 5 km

Buffer zones (water bodies, airport restrictions) and risk sites (landfills, waste processing) detected within 3 km (immediate) and 5 km (extended) of the project.

12
Risk zones (within 5 km)
3 km: 3 3–5 km: 9
9
Water bodies (river/nala/lake)
3 km: 3 3–5 km: 6
3
Landfill / waste sites
3 km: 0 3–5 km: 3
0
Airport buffer overlap
3 km: 0 3–5 km: 0
Risk Zone Map (3 km & 5 km rings) Project marker centered
Water Bodies (9)
  • Urla Talab ≤3 km
    Tank · 50m buffer
    1.27 km
  • Gudhiyari Nala ≤3 km
    Nala · 20m buffer
    1.74 km
  • Kharun Right Bank Canal ≤3 km
    Canal · 20m buffer
    2.03 km
  • Mathpurena Wetland 3–5 km
    Wetland · 75m buffer
    3.22 km
  • Bhatagaon Nala 3–5 km
    Nala · 20m buffer
    3.39 km
  • Dumartarai Reservoir 3–5 km
    Reservoir · 75m buffer
    3.69 km
  • Budha Talab (Vivekananda Sarovar) 3–5 km
    Lake · 50m buffer
    4.27 km
  • Devpuri Nala 3–5 km
    Nala · 20m buffer
    4.51 km
Landfill / Waste Sites (3)
  • Old Raipur Trenching Ground 3–5 km
    Inactive landfill · 500m buffer
    3.53 km
  • Bhanpuri-Rawabhata Legacy Dump 3–5 km
    Legacy dump · 500m buffer
    3.91 km
  • Gudhiyari Old Dump Site 3–5 km
    Legacy dump · 500m buffer
    4.51 km

Reviews

Verified buyer reviews and ratings for this project.

No reviews yet. Be the first to review this project!

Login to Write a Review

You need to be signed in to submit a review for this project.

Login or Register