You're viewing a preview. Log in or create a free account to see the full page.
RealEstateIQTM
IN हिन्दी
Want a full project intelligence report? Download a detailed PDF report — RERA compliance, promoter, financials, amenities, location & risk.
Generate Project Report
Home / RERA Projects / HARSHIT URBAN CITY
NEW Residential Plotted Development RERA Page Project Website

HARSHIT URBAN CITY

Compliance Status
Compliant
21.2327, 81.5897 Explore area
District
Raipur
Area
Promoter
M/S SINGHANIA BUILDCON PVT LTD
Project Information
Promoter M/S SINGHANIA BUILDCON PVT LTD
Type Residential Plotted Development
Status New
Completion 04 Jul 2029
Registered 25 Jul 2024
Original End 04 Jul 2029
Total Units 76 · 61 sold
EWS Category NO
Construction Cost ₹ 25109000
Land Cost ₹ 33694000
Authorised Person SUBODH SINGHANIA
Address VILLAGE - RAIPURA, TAHSIL- RAIPUR, DISTRICT- RAIPUR C.G. 492001
At a Glance
76
Total Units
61
Units Sold
5
Unsold
0
Legal Cases
Jul 2029
Target Completion
100%
Completion
Amenities & Facilities (12)
BOUNDARY WALL
100%
ENERGY MAANAGEMENT
100%
INTERNAL ROADS AND FOOTPATHS
100%
LANDSCAPING AND TREE PLANTING
100%
OPEN PARKING
100%
SECURITY SERVICE
100%
SEWERAGE
100%
STORM WATER DRAINS
100%
STREET LIGHTING
100%
tample
100%
WATER CONSERVATION RAIN WATER HARVESTING
100%
WATER SUPPLY
100%
Project Professionals
ANKIT SETHIYA
STATUTORY CA
MANOJ AGRAWAL
QUARTERLY CA
AMIT RAJ
ENGINEER
SACHIN KHARE
ARCHITECT
Project Analysis

360° Project Intelligence

Comprehensive analysis across regulatory, livability, market, filing activity, and market readiness dimensions.

Area Livability

Livability of Katapara

Eighteen environmental, infrastructure and amenity parameters for the nearest mapped area (Katapara — 0.42 km from this project). Click any parameter for the underlying readings, thresholds and what they mean.



🏠 Livability Parameters

Latest readings for Katapara. Only parameters with available data are shown below. Based on the latest readings for Katapara.

B
Composite Score
67.7 /100
Good

🌬️ Air Quality

Final Score: 98.8/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Air Quality?AQI summarizes PM2.5, PM10 and gases. Lower pollution values improve public health outcomes.
AQI
53
Satisfactory
PM2.5
23.9 µg/m³
≤ 40
PM10
49.7 µg/m³
≤ 60
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
PM2.5 23.9 µg/m³ ≤ 40
Good
PM10 49.7 µg/m³ ≤ 60
Good
NO₂ 9.5 µg/m³ ≤ 40
Good
💡 What does this mean for you?Cleaner air lowers respiratory burden and improves outdoor comfort.

💧 Water Quality

Final Score: 66.6/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Water Quality?Water quality combines chemistry, supply duration and contamination markers.
TDS
373 ppm
≤ 500
pH
7.45
6.5–8.5
Supply
7.0 hr/day
≥ 8 hr
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
TDS 373 ppm ≤ 500
Good
Fluoride 0.81 mg/L ≤ 1.0
Good
Turbidity 5.8 NTU ≤ 1
Concern
💡 What does this mean for you?Better supply quality and consistency reduces dependence on tanker/groundwater fallback.

🧹 Sanitation

Final Score: 30.0/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Sanitation?Sanitation reflects ODF status, sewage treatment and waste management regularity.
ODF
ODF
ODF++
Sewage Coverage
20%
≥ 80%
Drainage
30%
≥ 90%
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
ODF Status ODF ODF++
Info
Sewage Coverage 20% ≥ 80%
Concern
Drainage Coverage 30% ≥ 90%
Concern
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher sanitation maturity lowers disease exposure and neighborhood nuisance.

🛣️ Infrastructure

Final Score: 72.7/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Infrastructure?Infrastructure score combines land use, urbanization, built form, night lights and terrain indicators.
Built-up
46.6%
Balanced band
Tree Cover
19.1%
≥ 15%
Urbanization
94.6
Higher better
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Built-up (LULC) 46.6% 40-70%
Contextual
Impervious Surface 25.8% < 70%
Good
NDVI Mean 0.300 > 0.3
Concern
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Built-up (LULC) % 46.5% 46.6% 46.6%
Tree Cover % 20.9% 17.2% 19.1%
Urbanization Index 99.9 89.3 94.6
Infra Score 74.2 71.2 72.7
💡 What does this mean for you?Balanced built + green mix usually improves long-term livability resilience.

🏥 Amenities

Final Score: 79.4/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Amenities?Amenity score captures daily-access services in walk/short-drive radii.
Hospitals 500m
1
Target ≥1
Schools 1km
2
Target ≥3
Parks 500m
4
Target ≥1
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Hospitals (500m) 1 ≥1
Good
Schools (1km) 2 ≥3
Concern
Markets (1km) 5 ≥1
Good
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher local amenity density improves convenience and walkability.

🌳 Green Cover

Final Score: 46.7/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Green Cover?NDVI and vegetation structure are measured from satellite imagery to estimate neighborhood greenery.
NDVI Mean
0.247
Greenness index
Vegetation
30.8%
% green pixels
Dense Green
10.9%
Thick canopy
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
NDVI Mean 0.247 0.5 maps to score 100
Weighted 40%
Vegetation % 30.8% Direct % (cap 100)
Weighted 30%
Dense Green % 10.9% Scaled from 50%
Weighted 20%
Parks within 500m 4 Count * 33 (cap 100)
Weighted 10%
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
NDVI Mean 0.223 0.270 0.247
Vegetation % 27.8% 33.7% 30.8%
Dense Green % 9.4% 12.4% 10.9%
Tree Canopy % 16.2% 13.6% 14.9%
Green Score 39.9 46.7 43.3
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher green metrics typically reduce heat stress and improve comfort.

🔊 Noise

Final Score: 53.3/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Noise?Noise uses measured day/night dB compared to CPCB zone limits.
Day dB
58.6
vs CPCB day limit
Night dB
43.0
vs CPCB night limit
Zone
CPCB class
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Day Noise 58.6 dB ≤ 55.0 dB
Concern
Night Noise 43.0 dB ≤ 45.0 dB
Good
Nearest Highway 563 m Higher usually quieter
Info
💡 What does this mean for you?Chronic high noise impacts stress, sleep quality and perceived comfort.

🌊 Flood Risk

Final Score: 75.0/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Flood Risk?Flood risk combines river exposure and local waterlogging vulnerability.
Overall Risk
Low-Medium
Lower is safer
River Risk
Medium
Lower is safer
Waterlogging
Low
Lower is safer
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Overall Risk Low-Medium Low preferred
Info
River Flood Risk Medium Low preferred
Info
Waterlogging Risk Low Low preferred
Info
💡 What does this mean for you?Lower flood risk means less disruption and lower hazard exposure.

🏚️ Earthquake Risk

Final Score: 90.0/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Earthquake Risk?Earthquake profile uses seismic zone, PGA and soil/liquefaction risk factors.
Seismic Zone
Zone II
Lower risk zone preferred
Risk Level
Low
Low preferred
Liquefaction
None
Low preferred
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Seismic Zone Zone II II preferred
Info
Risk Level Low Low preferred
Info
PGA (475yr) 0.0155g Lower preferred
Info
💡 What does this mean for you?Lower seismic hazard reduces structural and insurance risk exposure.

🌡️ Land Surface Temp

Final Score: 61.6/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Land Surface Temp?Land Surface Temperature reflects heat-island intensity from satellite thermal bands.
LST Mean
29.6°C
Lower better
LST Min
17.7°C
Context
LST Max
39.4°C
Lower better
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
LST Mean 29.6°C 20°C best / 45°C worst
Weighted by formula
LST Score 61.6 0-100
Computed
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
LST Mean (°C) 29.4 29.9 29.6
LST Min (°C) 17.6 17.8 17.7
LST Max (°C) 39.8 39.1 39.4
LST Score 62.5 60.6 61.6
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher heat exposure affects comfort, cooling load and health risk.

🏗️ Built-up Density

Final Score: 53.5/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Built-up Density?Built-up density measures extent of developed surface versus open space.
Built-up %
46.6%
Lower better
Open Space %
53.5%
Higher better
Built-up Score
53.5
0-100
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Built-up % 46.6% Inverse scoring
Score = 100 - builtup%
Open Space % 53.5% Context
Info
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Built-up % 46.5% 46.6% 46.6%
Open Space % 53.5% 53.4% 53.5%
Built-up Score 53.5 53.4 53.5
💡 What does this mean for you?Very high built-up often raises heat and runoff while reducing open environmental buffers.

💡 Night-time Lights

Final Score: 35.8/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Night-time Lights?Nighttime lights are a proxy for economic activity and electrification intensity.
Avg Radiance
17.91
Higher better
Max Radiance
26.45
Context
NTL Score
35.8
0-100
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Avg Radiance 17.91 Scaled to 50
Score = min(100, avg/50*100)
NTL Score 35.8 0-100
Computed
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Avg Radiance 18.30 17.52 17.91
Max Radiance 26.55 26.36 26.45
NTL Score 36.6 35.0 35.8
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher radiance often indicates stronger urban activity but can correlate with light pollution.

🏞️ Water Bodies

Final Score: 97.2/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Water Bodies?Water-bodies score reflects permanent and seasonal water presence in the analysis radius.
Permanent Water
22.53%
Higher generally better
Seasonal Water
92.92%
Context
Water Score
100.0
0-100
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Permanent Water % 22.53% 70% weight
Scaled against 10%
Seasonal Water % 92.92% 30% weight
Scaled against 20%
Water Score 100.0 0-100
Computed
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Permanent Water % 9.21% 35.85% 22.53%
Seasonal Water % 90.98% 94.86% 92.92%
Water Score 94.5 100.0 100.0
💡 What does this mean for you?Water presence can support cooling, recharge and ecological quality.

👥 Population Density

Final Score: 78.0/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Population Density?Population density indicates urban crowding pressure around the area.
Population
71,996
Estimated residents
Density/km²
4,397.3
Lower better for this score
Score
78.0
0-100
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Density/km² 4,397.3 Inverse scale up to 20,000
Lower -> higher score
Score 78.0 0-100
Computed
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Population Total 13,084 130,907 71,996
Density / km² 4,164.7 4,629.9 4,397.3
Pop Density Score 79.2 76.9 78.0
💡 What does this mean for you?Extremely high density can increase pressure on services and mobility.

Groundwater

Final Score: 62.9/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Groundwater?Groundwater score combines moisture, recharge, drought and trend indicators.
Soil Moisture
130.881
Higher better
Recharge
1.95
Higher better
PDSI
2.95
Higher better
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Soil Moisture 130.881 30% weight
Scaled
Recharge 1.95 25% weight
Scaled
PDSI 2.95 20% weight
Scaled
SM Trend 0.0000 15% weight
Scaled
Precipitation 1,875.56 10% weight
Scaled
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Soil Moisture 131.025 130.738 130.881
Recharge Estimate 1.60 2.29 1.95
PDSI 2.93 2.97 2.95
Groundwater Score 62.9 63.0 62.9
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher score suggests better long-term aquifer and moisture support conditions.

🌧️ Waterlogging

↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Waterlogging?Waterlogging combines topography, imperviousness and wetness indices across nearby grid cells.
Grid Count
39
Sampled cells
Avg Susceptibility
51.2
Lower is safer
High Risk Grids
23
High / Very High
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTargetStatus
Avg Susceptibility 51.2 < 40
Concern
Avg Slope 2.84° > 1°
Good
Avg Impervious 30.8% < 70%
Good
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher susceptibility and low slope increase monsoon water stagnation probability.

🚶 Walkability & Safety

↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Walkability & Safety?OSM amenity metrics reflect pedestrian, safety and urban accessibility infrastructure.
Footpaths
0
Higher better
Street Lamps
0
Higher better
Police/Fire Access
3
Presence
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Footpaths (500m) 0 ≥ 3
Concern
Sidewalk Roads (1km) 7 ≥ 5
Good
Nearest Police Station 1,643 m ≤ 2000m
Context
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher OSM accessibility/safety features generally improve everyday livability.

🌬️ Air Quality: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

💧 Water Quality: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🧹 Sanitation: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🛣️ Infrastructure: Infrastructure Score Formula

Formula: Composite weighted model from GHSL/ESA/VIIRS/Terrain features
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Urbanization index94.6420%SMOD
Built-up balance46.6%15%Best in moderate band
NTL stability69.0%15%Power/activity consistency
Avg building height5.46 m10%Vertical infra proxy
Impervious %25.8%10%Moderate is optimal
Radiance18.0910%Development proxy
Slope0.10°10%Flatter is better
Green support19.1%10%Tree + grass contribution
This is the same weighted structure used in Livability Infrastructure model.
Final: 72.73 / 100

🏥 Amenities: Amenity Score Breakdown

Formula: Each amenity category is capped at 100, final score is averaged across categories
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Hospitals 500m1 * 33Cap 100Health access
Schools 1km2 * 20Cap 100Education access
Markets 1km5 * 33Cap 100Daily needs
Parks 500m4 * 33Cap 100Open space
Transit 1km0 * 50Cap 100Mobility
Category multipliers mirror the Livability snapshot logic.
Final: Final from amenity_scores table

🌳 Green Cover: Green Score Formula

Formula: Score = (NDVI*40%) + (Vegetation*30%) + (Dense Green*20%) + (Parks*10%)
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
NDVI component0.247 => 49.440%19.8
Vegetation component30.8% => 30.830%9.2
Dense green component10.9% => 21.820%4.4
Parks component4 => 100.010%10.0
This matches the Livability GreenCover model weighting logic.
Final: 43.34 / 100

🔊 Noise: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🌊 Flood Risk: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🏚️ Earthquake Risk: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🌡️ Land Surface Temp: LST Score Formula

Formula: Score = ((45 - LST Mean) / 25) * 100, clipped to [0,100]
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
LST Mean29.61 °CReference20°C best, 45°C worst
Lower land surface temperature means better livability.
Final: 61.56 / 100

🏗️ Built-up Density: Built-up Score Formula

Formula: Score = 100 - Built-up %
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Built-up %46.6%InverseLower is better
Dense concrete surfaces reduce infiltration and increase heat islands.
Final: 53.45 / 100

💡 Night-time Lights: Night-time Lights Formula

Formula: Score = min(100, (Avg Radiance / 50) * 100)
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Avg Radiance17.91Scale 0-50Higher indicates activity
Higher night radiance generally tracks electrification and economic intensity.
Final: 35.82 / 100

🏞️ Water Bodies: Water Bodies Score Formula

Formula: Score = (Permanent Water Score * 70%) + (Seasonal Water Score * 30%)
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Permanent water22.53%70%Scaled against 10% benchmark
Seasonal water92.92%30%Scaled against 20% benchmark
Permanent water has higher score weight than seasonal water.
Final: 100.00 / 100

👥 Population Density: Population Density Formula

Formula: Score = ((20000 - density_per_km²) / 20000) * 100, clipped to [0,100]
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Density4,397.3 /km²Inverse scaleLower density -> higher score
This follows the Livability PopulationDensity model.
Final: 78.01 / 100

⛲ Groundwater: Groundwater Score Formula

Formula: Weighted: Soil Moisture 30% + Recharge 25% + PDSI 20% + Trend 15% + Precipitation 10%
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Soil moisture130.88130%Scaled to 0-200
Recharge estimate1.9525%Scaled -200 to +400
PDSI2.9520%Scaled -4 to +4
SM trend0.000015%Scaled -50 to +50
Precipitation1,875.5610%Scaled 800 to 1800
Exactly reused from Livability Groundwater model logic.
Final: 62.92 / 100

🌧️ Waterlogging: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🚶 Walkability & Safety: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

View full livability report for Katapara →

Compliance Status

RERA registration, filings, and compliance flags based on public CG-RERA records.

Compliance Status Based on public CG-RERA records
4 Passed
2 N/A
RERA Registration Active
Reg No. PCGRERA250724001799 — Status: New
No RERA Orders
No complaints or orders found against this project
Sec 38–63 · Source
No Orders in Last 12 Months
Clean record — no complaints or orders filed
Within Timeline
Target completion: 04 Jul 2029
Section 4 · Source
Quarterly Updates Not Available
No compliance snapshot data on record
Section 11 · Source
Annual Audit Not Available
No compliance snapshot data on record
Section 4(2)(l)(D) · Source
Each check is based on publicly available CG-RERA portal data as of Jun 2026. How this works →
Other Projects by Same Promoter (14)
ProjectRERA No.StatusDistrictType
ARCHEE ICON CITY PCGRERA070718000497 Ongoing Raipur Plotted Development
govinda green PCGRERA210921001268 New Raipur Residential Plotted Development
Harshit Fortuna PCGRERA230618000302 Ongoing Raipur Residential Development
Harshit gold city PCGRERA040123001580 New Raipur Residential Plotted Development
Harshit Harmony PCGRERA200618000241 Ongoing Raipur Plotted Development
HARSHIT HARMONY EXTENSION PCGRERA191225002013 New Raipur Mixed Development
HARSHIT HARMONY PHASE -II P3CGRERA161118000013 Completed RAIPUR Group Housing
Harshit Icon City PCGRERA050718000466 Ongoing Raipur Plotted Development
harshit landmark (phase-i, block -a&b) PCGRERA160718000539 Ongoing Raipur Mixed Development
HARSHIT LANDMARK (PHASE-II, BLOCK- C & D) PCGRERA270618000349 Ongoing Raipur Mixed Development
HARSHIT LANDMARK (PHASE-III, BLOCK -E & F) PCGRERA270618000352 Ongoing Raipur Mixed Development
HARSHIT LANDMARK (PHASE-IV, BLOCK-G) PCGRERA270618000348 Ongoing Raipur Mixed Development
HARSHIT NEO CITY PCGRERA070718000496 Ongoing Durg Residential Development
HARSHIT PLATINUM GREEN PCGRERA201125001992 New Durg Residential Plotted Development

Details

Registration, professional team, bank, promoters, and compliance history.

Registration Details
RERA Number
PCGRERA250724001799
Status
New
Project Type
Residential Plotted Development
Approved Date
25 Jul 2024
Original End Date
04 Jul 2029
EWS Category
NO
Construction Cost
₹ 25109000
Land Cost
₹ 33694000
Proposed Completion
04 Jul 2029
Authorised Person
SUBODH SINGHANIA
Professional Team
RoleNameLicense / Membership
Statutory CA ANKIT SETHIYA 422261
Quarterly CA MANOJ AGRAWAL 077684
Engineer AMIT RAJ 833/2016
Architect SACHIN KHARE CA/2015/66924A

Buildings & Units

Inventory overview, sold/unsold breakdown, and building details.

Inventory Overview
76
Total Inventory
61
Sold (80%)
5
Unsold (7%)
10
Mortgage (13%)
80%
7%
13%
Sold Unsold Mortgage
Quarterly Plot Updates
PeriodTotalSold (prev)Sold (qtr)RemainingMortgage
2025-10-01 – 2025-12-31 76 56 5 15 10
2025-07-01 – 2025-09-30 76 48 8 20 10
2025-04-01 – 2025-06-30 76 39 11 28 10
2025-01-01 – 2025-03-31 76 24 16 37 10
2024-10-01 – 2024-12-31 76 10 14 52 10
2024-07-25 – 2024-09-30 76 0 10 66 10
Quarterly Building Updates
PeriodTotalSold (prev)Sold (qtr)RemainingMortgage
2025-10-01 – 2025-12-31 0 0 0 0 0
2025-07-01 – 2025-09-30 0 0 0 0 0
2025-04-01 – 2025-06-30 0 0 0 0 0
2025-01-01 – 2025-03-31 0 0 0 0 0
2024-10-01 – 2024-12-31 0 0 0 0 0
2024-07-25 – 2024-09-30 0 0 0 0 0
Quarterly Apartment Updates
PeriodTotalSold (prev)Sold (qtr)RemainingMortgage
2025-10-01 – 2025-12-31 0 0 0 0 0
2025-07-01 – 2025-09-30 0 0 0 0 0
2025-04-01 – 2025-06-30 0 0 0 0 0
2025-01-01 – 2025-03-31 0 0 0 0 0
2024-10-01 – 2024-12-31 0 0 0 0 0
2024-07-25 – 2024-09-30 0 0 0 0 0

Location

Project address, coordinates, and nearby places.

Location Details
Address
VILLAGE - RAIPURA, TAHSIL- RAIPUR, DISTRICT- RAIPUR C.G. 492001
District
Raipur
Tehsil
Raipur
Coordinates
21.2327114, 81.5896812 View on Map
Area Livability

Livability of Katapara Raipur

Environmental, infrastructure & amenity parameters for the area where this project is located (0.42 km from project). Each value is compared with the Raipur average.

Composite Livability Score
67.7 / 100
Grade B · Good
-1.3 vs Raipur avg (68.9)
Air Quality
98.8 Excellent
Area
99
City
93
+5.8 vs city avg
Water Quality
66.6 Good
Area
67
City
68
-1.4 vs city avg
Sanitation
30.0 Poor
Area
30
City
56
-26.0 vs city avg
Green Cover
46.7 Below Avg
Area
47
City
39
+8.2 vs city avg
Noise Level
53.3 Average
Area
53
City
58
-5.0 vs city avg
Infrastructure
72.7 Good
Area
73
City
76
-3.0 vs city avg
Amenities
79.4 Good
Area
79
City
82
-2.5 vs city avg
Flood Safety
75.0 Good
Area
75
City
62
+12.8 vs city avg
Earthquake Safety
90.0 Excellent
Area
90
City
86
+4.5 vs city avg
Land Surface Temp.
61.6 Average
Area
62
City
58
+3.8 vs city avg
Built-up Density
53.5 Average
Area
53
City
36
+18.0 vs city avg
Night-light Activity
35.8 Below Avg
Area
36
City
54
-18.4 vs city avg
Water Bodies Nearby
97.2 Excellent
Area
97
City
93
+4.4 vs city avg
Population Density
78.0 Good
Area
78
City
68
+9.8 vs city avg
Groundwater Status
62.9 Average
Area
63
City
63
-0.5 vs city avg
Neighborhood Intelligence

Explore nearby infrastructure around this project. Toggle categories to show/hide on the map.

Neighborhood Map 3 km radius
RERA Projects Near HARSHIT URBAN CITY 30 found within 3 km
# Project District Status Distance
1 URBAN BLOOM Raipur New 0.43 km
2 TDS-01 INDRAPRASTH PHASE -2 Raipur Ongoing 0.50 km
3 PIC heightS Raipur Ongoing 1.25 km
4 DREAM CITY Dhamtari New 1.47 km
5 chhugani pride phase - 2 Raipur New 1.51 km
6 admire green phase- 1 Raipur New 1.52 km
7 RALAS ENCLAVE Raipur Ongoing 1.67 km
8 ARIHANT NAGAR Raipur Ongoing 1.80 km
9 KRISHNA'S PARADISE PHASE - II Raipur Ongoing 1.83 km
10 KRISHNA SATTVAM PHASE 01 Raipur New 1.86 km
11 SANTI ENCLAVE Raipur Ongoing 1.89 km
12 GOKULDHAM RESIDENCY Raipur Ongoing 1.94 km
13 MANJEET SMART HOMES Raipur New 1.96 km
14 WALLFORT ALANCIA Raipur New 2.01 km
15 WALLFORT ALANCIA Raipur Ongoing 2.04 km
16 TIRUPATI ENCLAVE PHASE -I Raipur Ongoing 2.09 km
17 TIRUPATI ENCLAVE COMMERCIAL Raipur Ongoing 2.11 km
18 TIRUPATI ENCLAVE PHASE-03 Raipur New 2.14 km
19 TIRUPATI ENCLAVE PHASE- II Raipur Ongoing 2.26 km
20 PARK AVENUE Raipur New 2.29 km
21 kanchan vihar phase -ii Raipur Ongoing 2.31 km
22 vinayak city extension-2 Raipur New 2.34 km
23 KANCHAN VIHAR PHASE - I Raipur Ongoing 2.35 km
24 vinayak city extension-3 Raipur New 2.36 km
25 vinayak city extension-1 Raipur New 2.40 km
26 VINAYAK CITY Raipur New 2.45 km
27 SHIVLOK HEIGHTS Raipur New 2.48 km
28 WALLFORT SAPPHIRE Raipur Ongoing 2.55 km
29 ASK GRANDIOSE Raipur New 2.69 km
30 ishaan heightS Raipur New 2.72 km

Buyer Checklist

Documents and verifications a buyer should review before purchase.

Buyer Document Verification Checklist

Key documents a buyer should verify before purchasing in this project. Items marked Available have data on Seemankan.

11/14 verified
  • RERA Registration Certificate Available
    Confirms the project is registered with RERA CG. Verify registration number, validity dates, and project details on the RERA portal.
    RERA No: PCGRERA250724001799
  • Promoter Registration Certificate Available
    Builder / colonizer company registration certificate. Confirms the promoter entity is a registered firm, company, or society.
  • Approved Building / Sanction Plan Verify Independently
    Building plan sanctioned by the local authority. Verify floor count, setbacks, and FSI compliance.
  • Layout Plan Available
    Approved layout showing plot divisions, roads, open spaces, and common areas.
  • Title Deed / Ownership Proof Available
    Proof that the promoter legally owns the land. Verify via Sub-Registrar records.
  • Encumbrance Certificate Available
    Confirms the property is free from legal dues, mortgages, or liens. Obtain from Sub-Registrar office.
  • Land Use / Diversion Certificate Available
    Required if land was converted from agricultural to non-agricultural use.
  • Architect Certificate Available
    Certification from a registered architect confirming structural plans and compliance.
  • Structural Engineer Certificate Available
    Certification from a structural engineer confirming building safety and load-bearing capacity.
  • CA Financial Certificate Available
    Chartered Accountant certificate on financial status, project cost estimates, and fund utilization.
  • Commencement Certificate Available
    Permission to begin construction issued by the local authority after plan approval.
  • NOCs (No Objection Certificates) Verify Independently
    NOCs from fire department, environment, water supply, electricity board, and other authorities.
  • Project Brochure / Specification Available
    Official brochure with unit types, amenities, and specifications. Compare with actual delivery.
  • RERA Compliance Orders Verify Independently
    Check if any orders, penalties, or directions have been issued against this project by RERA.

Risk Zone Within 5 km

Buffer zones (water bodies, airport restrictions) and risk sites (landfills, waste processing) detected within 3 km (immediate) and 5 km (extended) of the project.

14
Risk zones (within 5 km)
3 km: 4 3–5 km: 10
9
Water bodies (river/nala/lake)
3 km: 3 3–5 km: 6
5
Landfill / waste sites
3 km: 1 3–5 km: 4
0
Airport buffer overlap
3 km: 0 3–5 km: 0
Risk Zone Map (3 km & 5 km rings) Project marker centered
Water Bodies (9)
  • Kharun Right Bank Canal ≤3 km
    Canal · 20m buffer
    2.13 km
  • Urla Talab ≤3 km
    Tank · 50m buffer
    2.27 km
  • Gudhiyari Nala ≤3 km
    Nala · 20m buffer
    2.88 km
  • Bhatagaon Nala 3–5 km
    Nala · 20m buffer
    3.2 km
  • Serikhedi Talab 3–5 km
    Tank · 50m buffer
    3.63 km
  • Mathpurena Wetland 3–5 km
    Wetland · 75m buffer
    4.01 km
  • Devpuri Nala 3–5 km
    Nala · 20m buffer
    4.04 km
  • Budha Talab (Vivekananda Sarovar) 3–5 km
    Lake · 50m buffer
    4.49 km
Landfill / Waste Sites (5)
  • Old Raipur Trenching Ground ≤3 km
    Inactive landfill · 500m buffer
    2.09 km
  • Gudhiyari Old Dump Site 3–5 km
    Legacy dump · 500m buffer
    3.03 km
  • Bhanpuri-Rawabhata Legacy Dump 3–5 km
    Legacy dump · 500m buffer
    3.09 km
  • Sarora Trenching Ground 3–5 km
    Active landfill · 500m buffer
    4.26 km
  • Sarora Composting / Bio-methanation Plant 3–5 km
    Waste processing · 200m buffer
    4.54 km

Documents

RERA-filed documents and disclosures available for this project.

Reviews

Verified buyer reviews and ratings for this project.

No reviews yet. Be the first to review this project!

Login to Write a Review

You need to be signed in to submit a review for this project.

Login or Register

Log in to see the full page

This page shows a preview. Sign in (or create a free account) to unlock the full content, charts, and downloads.

Log in Create account