Home / RERA Projects / HARSHIT LANDMARK (PHASE-III, BLOCK -E & F)
ONGOING Mixed Development RERA Page Project Website

HARSHIT LANDMARK (PHASE-III, BLOCK -E & F)

Compliance Status
Compliant
21.2679, 81.5818 Explore area
District
Raipur
Area
Promoter
M/S SINGHANIA BUILDCON PVT LTD
Project Information
Promoter M/S SINGHANIA BUILDCON PVT LTD
Type Mixed Development
Status Ongoing
Completion 31 Jan 2028
Registered 27 Jun 2018
Original End 31 May 2023
Total Units 112 · 44 sold
EWS Category NO
Construction Cost ₹ 548883000
Land Cost ₹ 91455000
Authorised Person SUBODH SINGHANIA
Address VILLAGE - HIRAPUR, RAIPUR (C.G.)
At a Glance
112
Total Units
44
Units Sold
57
Unsold
3
Legal Cases
Jan 2028
Target Completion
69%
Completion
Amenities & Facilities (18)
BOUNDARY WALL
71%
CLUB HOUSE
50%
COMMUNITY BUILDINGS
26%
ENERGY MAANAGEMENT
71%
FIRE PROTECTION AND FIRE SAFETY REQUIREMENTS
71%
GYM
0%
INTERNAL ROADS AND FOOTPATHS
91%
LANDSCAPING AND TREE PLANTING
61%
OPEN PARKING
61%
PLACE OF WORSHIP
100%
SECURITY SERVICE
76%
SEWERAGE
76%
STORM WATER DRAINS
66%
STREET LIGHTING
71%
tample
100%
TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL OF SEWERAGE AND SULLAGE WAT
71%
WATER CONSERVATION RAIN WATER HARVESTING
15%
WATER SUPPLY
76%
Project Professionals
ANKIT SETHIYA
STATUTORY CA
MANOJ AGRAWAL
QUARTERLY CA
AMIT RAJ
ENGINEER
SACHIN KHARE
ARCHITECT
Project Analysis

360° Project Intelligence

Comprehensive analysis across regulatory, livability, market, filing activity, and market readiness dimensions.

Area Livability

Livability of Hirapur

Eighteen environmental, infrastructure and amenity parameters for the nearest mapped area (Hirapur — 0.55 km from this project). Click any parameter for the underlying readings, thresholds and what they mean.



🏠 Livability Parameters

Latest readings for Hirapur. Only parameters with available data are shown below. Based on the latest readings for Hirapur.

C
Composite Score
56.0 /100
Average

🌬️ Air Quality

Final Score: 96.8/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Air Quality?AQI summarizes PM2.5, PM10 and gases. Lower pollution values improve public health outcomes.
AQI
58
Satisfactory
PM2.5
22.8 µg/m³
≤ 40
PM10
74.3 µg/m³
≤ 60
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
PM2.5 22.8 µg/m³ ≤ 40
Good
PM10 74.3 µg/m³ ≤ 60
Concern
NO₂ 22.8 µg/m³ ≤ 40
Good
💡 What does this mean for you?Cleaner air lowers respiratory burden and improves outdoor comfort.

💧 Water Quality

Final Score: 68.9/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Water Quality?Water quality combines chemistry, supply duration and contamination markers.
TDS
448 ppm
≤ 500
pH
7.37
6.5–8.5
Supply
5.5 hr/day
≥ 8 hr
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
TDS 448 ppm ≤ 500
Good
Fluoride 0.88 mg/L ≤ 1.0
Good
Turbidity 3.3 NTU ≤ 1
Concern
💡 What does this mean for you?Better supply quality and consistency reduces dependence on tanker/groundwater fallback.

🧹 Sanitation

Final Score: 48.3/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Sanitation?Sanitation reflects ODF status, sewage treatment and waste management regularity.
ODF
ODF+
ODF++
Sewage Coverage
35%
≥ 80%
Drainage
45%
≥ 90%
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
ODF Status ODF+ ODF++
Info
Sewage Coverage 35% ≥ 80%
Concern
Drainage Coverage 45% ≥ 90%
Concern
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher sanitation maturity lowers disease exposure and neighborhood nuisance.

🛣️ Infrastructure

Final Score: 71.9/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Infrastructure?Infrastructure score combines land use, urbanization, built form, night lights and terrain indicators.
Built-up
59.7%
Balanced band
Tree Cover
10.8%
≥ 15%
Urbanization
96.2
Higher better
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Built-up (LULC) 59.7% 40-70%
Contextual
Impervious Surface 42.3% < 70%
Good
NDVI Mean 0.230 > 0.3
Concern
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Built-up (LULC) % 80.5% 38.9% 59.7%
Tree Cover % 5.6% 16.0% 10.8%
Urbanization Index 100.0 92.3 96.2
Infra Score 74.2 69.5 78.2
💡 What does this mean for you?Balanced built + green mix usually improves long-term livability resilience.

🏥 Amenities

Final Score: 84.7/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Amenities?Amenity score captures daily-access services in walk/short-drive radii.
Hospitals 500m
2
Target ≥1
Schools 1km
6
Target ≥3
Parks 500m
2
Target ≥1
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Hospitals (500m) 2 ≥1
Good
Schools (1km) 6 ≥3
Good
Markets (1km) 7 ≥1
Good
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher local amenity density improves convenience and walkability.

🌳 Green Cover

Final Score: 36.7/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Green Cover?NDVI and vegetation structure are measured from satellite imagery to estimate neighborhood greenery.
NDVI Mean
0.191
Greenness index
Vegetation
25.0%
% green pixels
Dense Green
12.7%
Thick canopy
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
NDVI Mean 0.191 0.5 maps to score 100
Weighted 40%
Vegetation % 25.0% Direct % (cap 100)
Weighted 30%
Dense Green % 12.7% Scaled from 50%
Weighted 20%
Parks within 500m 2 Count * 33 (cap 100)
Weighted 10%
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
NDVI Mean 0.158 0.224 0.191
Vegetation % 27.2% 22.8% 25.0%
Dense Green % 12.1% 13.3% 12.7%
Tree Canopy % 15.2% 13.1% 14.2%
Green Score 32.2 36.7 34.5
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher green metrics typically reduce heat stress and improve comfort.

🔊 Noise

Final Score: 68.5/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Noise?Noise uses measured day/night dB compared to CPCB zone limits.
Day dB
51.7
vs CPCB day limit
Night dB
49.3
vs CPCB night limit
Zone
CPCB class
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Day Noise 51.7 dB ≤ 55.0 dB
Good
Night Noise 49.3 dB ≤ 45.0 dB
Concern
Nearest Highway 1,191 m Higher usually quieter
Info
💡 What does this mean for you?Chronic high noise impacts stress, sleep quality and perceived comfort.

🌊 Flood Risk

Final Score: 17.5/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Flood Risk?Flood risk combines river exposure and local waterlogging vulnerability.
Overall Risk
Low-Medium
Lower is safer
River Risk
Low-Medium
Lower is safer
Waterlogging
Low
Lower is safer
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Overall Risk Low-Medium Low preferred
Info
River Flood Risk Low-Medium Low preferred
Info
Waterlogging Risk Low Low preferred
Info
💡 What does this mean for you?Lower flood risk means less disruption and lower hazard exposure.

🏚️ Earthquake Risk

Final Score: 10.0/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Earthquake Risk?Earthquake profile uses seismic zone, PGA and soil/liquefaction risk factors.
Seismic Zone
Zone II
Lower risk zone preferred
Risk Level
Low
Low preferred
Liquefaction
None
Low preferred
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Seismic Zone Zone II II preferred
Info
Risk Level Low Low preferred
Info
PGA (475yr) 0.0155g Lower preferred
Info
💡 What does this mean for you?Lower seismic hazard reduces structural and insurance risk exposure.

🌡️ Land Surface Temp

Final Score: 55.8/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Land Surface Temp?Land Surface Temperature reflects heat-island intensity from satellite thermal bands.
LST Mean
31.1°C
Lower better
LST Min
19.2°C
Context
LST Max
41.6°C
Lower better
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
LST Mean 31.1°C 20°C best / 45°C worst
Weighted by formula
LST Score 55.8 0-100
Computed
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
LST Mean (°C) 31.2 30.9 31.1
LST Min (°C) 18.0 20.3 19.2
LST Max (°C) 42.2 40.9 41.6
LST Score 55.2 56.3 55.8
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher heat exposure affects comfort, cooling load and health risk.

🏗️ Built-up Density

Final Score: 40.3/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Built-up Density?Built-up density measures extent of developed surface versus open space.
Built-up %
59.7%
Lower better
Open Space %
40.3%
Higher better
Built-up Score
40.3
0-100
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Built-up % 59.7% Inverse scoring
Score = 100 - builtup%
Open Space % 40.3% Context
Info
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Built-up % 80.5% 38.9% 59.7%
Open Space % 19.5% 61.2% 40.3%
Built-up Score 19.5 61.2 40.3
💡 What does this mean for you?Very high built-up often raises heat and runoff while reducing open environmental buffers.

💡 Night-time Lights

Final Score: 40.1/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Night-time Lights?Nighttime lights are a proxy for economic activity and electrification intensity.
Avg Radiance
20.07
Higher better
Max Radiance
32.05
Context
NTL Score
40.1
0-100
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Avg Radiance 20.07 Scaled to 50
Score = min(100, avg/50*100)
NTL Score 40.1 0-100
Computed
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Avg Radiance 23.41 16.73 20.07
Max Radiance 38.32 25.79 32.05
NTL Score 46.8 33.5 40.1
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher radiance often indicates stronger urban activity but can correlate with light pollution.

🏞️ Water Bodies

Final Score: 100.0/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Water Bodies?Water-bodies score reflects permanent and seasonal water presence in the analysis radius.
Permanent Water
62.50%
Higher generally better
Seasonal Water
96.31%
Context
Water Score
100.0
0-100
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Permanent Water % 62.50% 70% weight
Scaled against 10%
Seasonal Water % 96.31% 30% weight
Scaled against 20%
Water Score 100.0 0-100
Computed
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Permanent Water % 77.88% 47.12% 62.50%
Seasonal Water % 99.12% 93.49% 96.31%
Water Score 100.0 100.0 100.0
💡 What does this mean for you?Water presence can support cooling, recharge and ecological quality.

👥 Population Density

Final Score: 74.7/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Population Density?Population density indicates urban crowding pressure around the area.
Population
65,238
Estimated residents
Density/km²
5,055.9
Lower better for this score
Score
74.7
0-100
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Density/km² 5,055.9 Inverse scale up to 20,000
Lower -> higher score
Score 74.7 0-100
Computed
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Population Total 19,428 111,048 65,238
Density / km² 6,184.3 3,927.5 5,055.9
Pop Density Score 69.1 80.4 74.7
💡 What does this mean for you?Extremely high density can increase pressure on services and mobility.

Groundwater

Final Score: 63.2/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Groundwater?Groundwater score combines moisture, recharge, drought and trend indicators.
Soil Moisture
130.625
Higher better
Recharge
2.86
Higher better
PDSI
3.06
Higher better
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Soil Moisture 130.625 30% weight
Scaled
Recharge 2.86 25% weight
Scaled
PDSI 3.06 20% weight
Scaled
SM Trend 0.0000 15% weight
Scaled
Precipitation 1,874.93 10% weight
Scaled
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Soil Moisture 130.756 130.494 130.625
Recharge Estimate 2.69 3.02 2.86
PDSI 3.06 3.05 3.06
Groundwater Score 63.2 63.2 63.2
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher score suggests better long-term aquifer and moisture support conditions.

🌧️ Waterlogging

↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Waterlogging?Waterlogging combines topography, imperviousness and wetness indices across nearby grid cells.
Grid Count
16
Sampled cells
Avg Susceptibility
53.0
Lower is safer
High Risk Grids
14
High / Very High
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTargetStatus
Avg Susceptibility 53.0 < 40
Concern
Avg Slope 2.74° > 1°
Good
Avg Impervious 49.0% < 70%
Good
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher susceptibility and low slope increase monsoon water stagnation probability.

🚶 Walkability & Safety

↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Walkability & Safety?OSM amenity metrics reflect pedestrian, safety and urban accessibility infrastructure.
Footpaths
0
Higher better
Street Lamps
0
Higher better
Police/Fire Access
0
Presence
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Footpaths (500m) 0 ≥ 3
Concern
Sidewalk Roads (1km) 0 ≥ 5
Concern
Nearest Police Station — m ≤ 2000m
Context
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher OSM accessibility/safety features generally improve everyday livability.

🌬️ Air Quality: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

💧 Water Quality: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🧹 Sanitation: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🛣️ Infrastructure: Infrastructure Score Formula

Formula: Composite weighted model from GHSL/ESA/VIIRS/Terrain features
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Urbanization index96.1620%SMOD
Built-up balance59.7%15%Best in moderate band
NTL stability66.0%15%Power/activity consistency
Avg building height7.02 m10%Vertical infra proxy
Impervious %42.3%10%Moderate is optimal
Radiance19.8710%Development proxy
Slope0.10°10%Flatter is better
Green support10.8%10%Tree + grass contribution
This is the same weighted structure used in Livability Infrastructure model.
Final: 78.21 / 100

🏥 Amenities: Amenity Score Breakdown

Formula: Each amenity category is capped at 100, final score is averaged across categories
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Hospitals 500m2 * 33Cap 100Health access
Schools 1km6 * 20Cap 100Education access
Markets 1km7 * 33Cap 100Daily needs
Parks 500m2 * 33Cap 100Open space
Transit 1km0 * 50Cap 100Mobility
Category multipliers mirror the Livability snapshot logic.
Final: Final from amenity_scores table

🌳 Green Cover: Green Score Formula

Formula: Score = (NDVI*40%) + (Vegetation*30%) + (Dense Green*20%) + (Parks*10%)
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
NDVI component0.191 => 38.240%15.3
Vegetation component25.0% => 25.030%7.5
Dense green component12.7% => 25.420%5.1
Parks component2 => 66.010%6.6
This matches the Livability GreenCover model weighting logic.
Final: 34.46 / 100

🔊 Noise: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🌊 Flood Risk: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🏚️ Earthquake Risk: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🌡️ Land Surface Temp: LST Score Formula

Formula: Score = ((45 - LST Mean) / 25) * 100, clipped to [0,100]
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
LST Mean31.06 °CReference20°C best, 45°C worst
Lower land surface temperature means better livability.
Final: 55.76 / 100

🏗️ Built-up Density: Built-up Score Formula

Formula: Score = 100 - Built-up %
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Built-up %59.7%InverseLower is better
Dense concrete surfaces reduce infiltration and increase heat islands.
Final: 40.32 / 100

💡 Night-time Lights: Night-time Lights Formula

Formula: Score = min(100, (Avg Radiance / 50) * 100)
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Avg Radiance20.07Scale 0-50Higher indicates activity
Higher night radiance generally tracks electrification and economic intensity.
Final: 40.14 / 100

🏞️ Water Bodies: Water Bodies Score Formula

Formula: Score = (Permanent Water Score * 70%) + (Seasonal Water Score * 30%)
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Permanent water62.50%70%Scaled against 10% benchmark
Seasonal water96.31%30%Scaled against 20% benchmark
Permanent water has higher score weight than seasonal water.
Final: 100.00 / 100

👥 Population Density: Population Density Formula

Formula: Score = ((20000 - density_per_km²) / 20000) * 100, clipped to [0,100]
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Density5,055.9 /km²Inverse scaleLower density -> higher score
This follows the Livability PopulationDensity model.
Final: 74.72 / 100

⛲ Groundwater: Groundwater Score Formula

Formula: Weighted: Soil Moisture 30% + Recharge 25% + PDSI 20% + Trend 15% + Precipitation 10%
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Soil moisture130.62530%Scaled to 0-200
Recharge estimate2.8625%Scaled -200 to +400
PDSI3.0620%Scaled -4 to +4
SM trend0.000015%Scaled -50 to +50
Precipitation1,874.9310%Scaled 800 to 1800
Exactly reused from Livability Groundwater model logic.
Final: 63.19 / 100

🌧️ Waterlogging: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🚶 Walkability & Safety: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

View full livability report for Hirapur →

Compliance Status

RERA registration, filings, and compliance flags based on public CG-RERA records.

Compliance Status Based on public CG-RERA records
3 Passed
1 Warning
2 N/A
RERA Registration Active
Reg No. PCGRERA270618000352 — Status: Ongoing
No Penalty Orders
3 order(s) on record, none with penalty sections (Sec 38/39/40/59/61/63)
Sec 38–63 · Source
1 Order(s) in Last 12 Months
Recent: SM-EXA-2026-03449
Within Timeline
Target completion: 31 Jan 2028
Section 4 · Source
Quarterly Updates Not Available
No compliance snapshot data on record
Section 11 · Source
Annual Audit Not Available
No compliance snapshot data on record
Section 4(2)(l)(D) · Source
Each check is based on publicly available CG-RERA portal data as of Apr 2026. How this works →
Other Projects by Same Promoter (15)
ProjectRERA No.StatusDistrictType
ARCHEE ICON CITY PCGRERA070718000497 Ongoing Raipur Plotted Development
govinda green PCGRERA210921001268 New Raipur Residential Plotted Development
Harshit Fortuna PCGRERA230618000302 Ongoing Raipur Residential Development
Harshit gold city PCGRERA040123001580 New Raipur Residential Plotted Development
Harshit Harmony PCGRERA200618000241 Ongoing Raipur Plotted Development
HARSHIT HARMONY EXTENSION PCGRERA191225002013 New Raipur Mixed Plotted Development
HARSHIT HARMONY PHASE -II P3CGRERA161118000013 Completed RAIPUR Group Housing
HARSHIT HARMONY PHASE -II P3CGRERA161118000013 RAIPUR Group Housing
Harshit Icon City PCGRERA050718000466 Ongoing Raipur Plotted Development
harshit landmark (phase-i, block -a&b) PCGRERA160718000539 Ongoing Raipur Mixed Development
HARSHIT LANDMARK (PHASE-II, BLOCK- C & D) PCGRERA270618000349 Ongoing Raipur Mixed Development
HARSHIT LANDMARK (PHASE-IV, BLOCK-G) PCGRERA270618000348 Ongoing Raipur Mixed Development
HARSHIT NEO CITY PCGRERA070718000496 Ongoing Durg Residential Development
HARSHIT PLATINUM GREEN PCGRERA201125001992 New Durg Residential Plotted Development
HARSHIT URBAN CITY PCGRERA250724001799 New Raipur Residential Plotted Development

Details

Registration, professional team, bank, promoters, and compliance history.

Registration Details
RERA Number
PCGRERA270618000352
Status
Ongoing
Project Type
Mixed Development
Approved Date
27 Jun 2018
Original End Date
31 May 2023
EWS Category
NO
Construction Cost
₹ 548883000
Land Cost
₹ 91455000
Proposed Completion
31 Jan 2028
Authorised Person
SUBODH SINGHANIA
Website
www.singhaniabuildcon.com/projects_detail.php?project
Professional Team
RoleNameLicense / Membership
Statutory CA ANKIT SETHIYA 422261
Quarterly CA MANOJ AGRAWAL 077684
Engineer AMIT RAJ 833/2016
Architect SACHIN KHARE CA/2015/66924

Location

Project address, coordinates, and nearby places.

Location Details
Address
VILLAGE - HIRAPUR, RAIPUR (C.G.)
District
Raipur
Tehsil
Raipur
Coordinates
21.2679219, 81.5817588 View on Map
Neighborhood Intelligence

Explore nearby infrastructure around this project. Toggle categories to show/hide on the map.

Neighborhood Map 3 km radius
RERA Projects Near HARSHIT LANDMARK (PHASE-III, BLOCK -E & F) 30 found within 3 km
# Project District Status Distance
1 HARSHIT LANDMARK (PHASE-IV, BLOCK-G) Raipur Ongoing 0.01 km
2 harshit landmark (phase-i, block -a&b) Raipur Ongoing 0.06 km
3 HARSHIT LANDMARK (PHASE-II, BLOCK- C & D) Raipur Ongoing 0.11 km
4 sun city Raipur Ongoing 0.64 km
5 shree ram vihar Raipur New 0.73 km
6 CELEBRITY HOMES Raipur Ongoing 0.74 km
7 Avinash pride Raipur New 0.81 km
8 govinda green Raipur New 0.90 km
9 VEDANTA VATIKA Raipur New 0.91 km
10 ARYAPOLIS Raipur Ongoing 1.14 km
11 fortune residency Raipur New 1.15 km
12 PARTHIVI PACIFIC-ROYAL WOODS Raipur Ongoing 1.22 km
13 v3 bAlaji green city, & balaji hights Raipur Ongoing 1.25 km
14 URBAN ESTATE Phase II Raipur New 1.29 km
15 R EMINENCE MALL Raipur Ongoing 1.33 km
16 imperial heights Raipur Ongoing 1.37 km
17 URBAN ESTATE Raipur New 1.37 km
18 SHRI RAM TOWERS Raipur Ongoing 1.37 km
19 suryoday enclave Raipur New 1.39 km
20 SHRI RAM LOTUS VALLEY Raipur Ongoing 1.46 km
21 CONSTRUCTION & DEVELOPMNT OF 96 LIG (G+6)&48 EWS (G+6) FLATS AT PHASE-3 KABIR NAGAR RAIPUR Raipur New 1.56 km
22 maruti life style tower Raipur New 1.60 km
23 ishaan heightS Raipur New 1.62 km
24 KANCHAN VIHAR PHASE - I Raipur Ongoing 1.66 km
25 life style empressa Raipur Ongoing 1.69 km
26 kanchan vihar phase -ii Raipur Ongoing 1.70 km
27 TIRUPATI ENCLAVE PHASE- II Raipur Ongoing 1.74 km
28 PMAY OF 348 DUS AT HIRAPUR ,RAIPUR Raipur Ongoing 1.75 km
29 TIRUPATI ENCLAVE PHASE-03 Raipur New 1.87 km
30 TIRUPATI ENCLAVE COMMERCIAL Raipur Ongoing 1.89 km

Buyer Checklist

Documents and verifications a buyer should review before purchase.

Buyer Document Verification Checklist

Key documents a buyer should verify before purchasing in this project. Items marked Available have data on Seemankan.

11/14 verified
  • RERA Registration Certificate Available
    Confirms the project is registered with RERA CG. Verify registration number, validity dates, and project details on the RERA portal.
    RERA No: PCGRERA270618000352
  • Promoter Registration Certificate Available
    Builder / colonizer company registration certificate. Confirms the promoter entity is a registered firm, company, or society.
  • Approved Building / Sanction Plan Available
    Building plan sanctioned by the local authority. Verify floor count, setbacks, and FSI compliance.
  • Layout Plan Available
    Approved layout showing plot divisions, roads, open spaces, and common areas.
  • Title Deed / Ownership Proof Available
    Proof that the promoter legally owns the land. Verify via Sub-Registrar records.
  • Encumbrance Certificate Available
    Confirms the property is free from legal dues, mortgages, or liens. Obtain from Sub-Registrar office.
  • Land Use / Diversion Certificate Verify Independently
    Required if land was converted from agricultural to non-agricultural use.
  • Architect Certificate Available
    Certification from a registered architect confirming structural plans and compliance.
  • Structural Engineer Certificate Available
    Certification from a structural engineer confirming building safety and load-bearing capacity.
  • CA Financial Certificate Available
    Chartered Accountant certificate on financial status, project cost estimates, and fund utilization.
  • Commencement Certificate Verify Independently
    Permission to begin construction issued by the local authority after plan approval.
  • NOCs (No Objection Certificates) Verify Independently
    NOCs from fire department, environment, water supply, electricity board, and other authorities.
  • Project Brochure / Specification Available
    Official brochure with unit types, amenities, and specifications. Compare with actual delivery.
  • RERA Compliance Orders Available
    Check if any orders, penalties, or directions have been issued against this project by RERA.
    3 order(s) on record — review in Legal tab

Risk Zone Within 5 km

Buffer zones (water bodies, airport restrictions) and risk sites (landfills, waste processing) detected within 3 km (immediate) and 5 km (extended) of the project.

15
Risk zones (within 5 km)
3 km: 5 3–5 km: 10
7
Water bodies (river/nala/lake)
3 km: 2 3–5 km: 5
8
Landfill / waste sites
3 km: 3 3–5 km: 5
0
Airport buffer overlap
3 km: 0 3–5 km: 0
Risk Zone Map (3 km & 5 km rings) Project marker centered
Water Bodies (7)
  • Serikhedi Talab ≤3 km
    Tank · 50m buffer
    1.41 km
  • Kumhari Talab ≤3 km
    Tank · 50m buffer
    2.78 km
  • Tatibandh Talab 3–5 km
    Tank · 50m buffer
    3.18 km
  • Tatibandh Nala 3–5 km
    Nala · 20m buffer
    3.84 km
  • Sarora Talab 3–5 km
    Pond · 50m buffer
    4.61 km
  • Mowa Talab 3–5 km
    Tank · 50m buffer
    4.71 km
  • Devpuri Nala 3–5 km
    Nala · 20m buffer
    5 km
Landfill / Waste Sites (8)
  • Gudhiyari Old Dump Site ≤3 km
    Legacy dump · 500m buffer
    1.23 km
  • Jarway Transfer Station ≤3 km
    Transfer station · 100m buffer
    1.68 km
  • Old Raipur Trenching Ground ≤3 km
    Inactive landfill · 500m buffer
    2.44 km
  • Tatibandh Legacy Dump 3–5 km
    Legacy dump · 500m buffer
    3.07 km
  • Sarora Composting / Bio-methanation Plant 3–5 km
    Waste processing · 200m buffer
    3.85 km
  • Sarora Trenching Ground 3–5 km
    Active landfill · 500m buffer
    4 km
  • Bhanpuri-Rawabhata Legacy Dump 3–5 km
    Legacy dump · 500m buffer
    4.3 km
  • Sarora SLRM Centre (Manikanchan Kendra) 3–5 km
    Waste processing · 200m buffer
    4.33 km

Reviews

Verified buyer reviews and ratings for this project.

No reviews yet. Be the first to review this project!

Login to Write a Review

You need to be signed in to submit a review for this project.

Login or Register