NEW Residential Plotted Development RERA Page

GENERATE REPORT

VEDANTA VATIKA

21.2712, 81.5737 Explore area

District

Raipur

Area

—

Promoter

M/S RAJA VATIKA

Project Information

Promoter M/S RAJA VATIKA

Type Residential Plotted Development

Status New

Completion 13 Feb 2029

RERA No. PCGRERA240624001788

Registered 24 Jun 2024

Original End 13 Feb 2029

Total Units 557 · 345 sold

EWS Category NO

Construction Cost ₹ 252838000

Land Cost ₹ 353418000

Authorised Person SUNILA CHAWLA

Address VILLAGE: JARVAY URF HIRAPUR, PATWARI HALKA: 00035, TAHSIL: RAIPUR, DISTRICT: RAIPUR (C.G.)

At a Glance

557

Total Units

345

Units Sold

151

Unsold

Legal Cases

Feb 2029

Target Completion

27%

Completion

Amenities & Facilities (16)

BOUNDARY WALL

70%

CLUB HOUSE

55%

COMMUNITY BUILDINGS

55%

ENERGY MAANAGEMENT

FIRE PROTECTION AND FIRE SAFETY REQUIREMENTS

INTERNAL ROADS AND FOOTPATHS

50%

LANDSCAPING AND TREE PLANTING

25%

OPEN PARKING

17%

SECURITY SERVICE

10%

SEWERAGE

42%

SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT AND DISPOSAL

STORM WATER DRAINS

42%

STREET LIGHTING

35%

TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL OF SEWERAGE AND SULLAGE WAT

WATER CONSERVATION RAIN WATER HARVESTING

10%

WATER SUPPLY

20%

Project Professionals

AKSHAY SINDHWANI

STATUTORY CA

GURVINDER SINGH CHHABRA

QUARTERLY CA

RAJENDRA JAIN

ENGINEER

SHASHIKANT KUJUR

ARCHITECT

Project Analysis

360° Project Intelligence

Comprehensive analysis across regulatory, livability, market, filing activity, and market readiness dimensions.

Regulatory

12 of 14 checks · Strong Signals

Livability

Tatibandh · Moderate Signals

Legal

No legal orders on record · 30 nearby

Filing Activity

139

118 docs · 21 quarterly updates

Market Readiness

New · due Feb 2029

Area Livability

Livability of Tatibandh

Eighteen environmental, infrastructure and amenity parameters for the nearest mapped area (Tatibandh — 1.11 km from this project). Click any parameter for the underlying readings, thresholds and what they mean.

🏠 Livability Parameters

Latest readings for Tatibandh. Only parameters with available data are shown below. Based on the latest readings for Tatibandh.

Composite Score

60.0 /100

Good

🌬️ Air Quality

Final Score: 97.2/100 ↑ Higher is Better

ℹ️ What is Air Quality?AQI summarizes PM2.5, PM10 and gases. Lower pollution values improve public health outcomes.

AQI

Satisfactory

PM2.5

22.7 µg/m³

≤ 40

PM10

72.9 µg/m³

≤ 60

Scoring Breakdown

Parameter	Value	Target / Rule	Status
PM2.5	22.7 µg/m³	≤ 40	Good
PM10	72.9 µg/m³	≤ 60	Concern
NO₂	30.4 µg/m³	≤ 40	Good

💡 What does this mean for you?Cleaner air lowers respiratory burden and improves outdoor comfort.

💧 Water Quality

Final Score: 76.3/100 ↑ Higher is Better

ℹ️ What is Water Quality?Water quality combines chemistry, supply duration and contamination markers.

TDS

366 ppm

≤ 500

7.76

6.5–8.5

Supply

7.2 hr/day

≥ 8 hr

Scoring Breakdown

Parameter	Value	Target / Rule	Status
TDS	366 ppm	≤ 500	Good
Fluoride	0.79 mg/L	≤ 1.0	Good
Turbidity	5.0 NTU	≤ 1	Concern

💡 What does this mean for you?Better supply quality and consistency reduces dependence on tanker/groundwater fallback.

🧹 Sanitation

Final Score: 67.3/100 ↑ Higher is Better

ℹ️ What is Sanitation?Sanitation reflects ODF status, sewage treatment and waste management regularity.

ODF

ODF+

ODF++

Sewage Coverage

55%

≥ 80%

Drainage

65%

≥ 90%

Scoring Breakdown

Parameter	Value	Target / Rule	Status
ODF Status	ODF+	ODF++	Info
Sewage Coverage	55%	≥ 80%	Concern
Drainage Coverage	65%	≥ 90%	Concern

💡 What does this mean for you?Higher sanitation maturity lowers disease exposure and neighborhood nuisance.

🛣️ Infrastructure

Final Score: 70.2/100 ↑ Higher is Better

ℹ️ What is Infrastructure?Infrastructure score combines land use, urbanization, built form, night lights and terrain indicators.

Built-up

51.6%

Balanced band

Tree Cover

12.1%

≥ 15%

Urbanization

91.8

Higher better

Scoring Breakdown

Parameter	Value	Target / Rule	Status
Built-up (LULC)	51.6%	40-70%	Contextual
Impervious Surface	40.9%	< 70%	Good
NDVI Mean	0.230	> 0.3	Concern

Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison

Parameter	1000m	3000m	Average (Final)
Built-up (LULC) %	70.2%	33.0%	51.6%
Tree Cover %	6.5%	17.7%	12.1%
Urbanization Index	100.0	83.5	91.8
Infra Score	75.2	65.2	74.7

💡 What does this mean for you?Balanced built + green mix usually improves long-term livability resilience.

🏥 Amenities

Final Score: 100.0/100 ↑ Higher is Better

ℹ️ What is Amenities?Amenity score captures daily-access services in walk/short-drive radii.

Hospitals 500m

Target ≥1

Schools 1km

Target ≥3

Parks 500m

Target ≥1

Scoring Breakdown

Parameter	Value	Target / Rule	Status
Hospitals (500m)	5	≥1	Good
Schools (1km)	5	≥3	Good
Markets (1km)	5	≥1	Good

💡 What does this mean for you?Higher local amenity density improves convenience and walkability.

🌳 Green Cover

Final Score: 31.9/100 ↑ Higher is Better

ℹ️ What is Green Cover?NDVI and vegetation structure are measured from satellite imagery to estimate neighborhood greenery.

NDVI Mean

0.132

Greenness index

Vegetation

15.0%

% green pixels

Dense Green

5.8%

Thick canopy

Scoring Breakdown

Parameter	Value	Target / Rule	Status
NDVI Mean	0.132	0.5 maps to score 100	Weighted 40%
Vegetation %	15.0%	Direct % (cap 100)	Weighted 30%
Dense Green %	5.8%	Scaled from 50%	Weighted 20%
Parks within 500m	8	Count * 33 (cap 100)	Weighted 10%

Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison

Parameter	1000m	3000m	Average (Final)
NDVI Mean	0.104	0.159	0.132
Vegetation %	8.3%	21.6%	15.0%
Dense Green %	5.1%	6.6%	5.8%
Tree Canopy %	7.1%	10.2%	8.7%
Green Score	22.8	31.9	27.4

💡 What does this mean for you?Higher green metrics typically reduce heat stress and improve comfort.

🔊 Noise

Final Score: 70.0/100 ↑ Higher is Better

ℹ️ What is Noise?Noise uses measured day/night dB compared to CPCB zone limits.

Day dB

55.3

vs CPCB day limit

Night dB

50.3

vs CPCB night limit

Zone

commercial

CPCB class

Scoring Breakdown

Parameter	Value	Target / Rule	Status
Day Noise	55.3 dB	≤ 65.0 dB	Good
Night Noise	50.3 dB	≤ 55.0 dB	Good
Nearest Highway	1,001 m	Higher usually quieter	Info

💡 What does this mean for you?Chronic high noise impacts stress, sleep quality and perceived comfort.

🌊 Flood Risk

Final Score: 17.5/100 ↑ Higher is Better

ℹ️ What is Flood Risk?Flood risk combines river exposure and local waterlogging vulnerability.

Overall Risk

Low-Medium

Lower is safer

River Risk

Low-Medium

Lower is safer

Waterlogging

Low

Lower is safer

Scoring Breakdown

Parameter	Value	Target / Rule	Status
Overall Risk	Low-Medium	Low preferred	Info
River Flood Risk	Low-Medium	Low preferred	Info
Waterlogging Risk	Low	Low preferred	Info

💡 What does this mean for you?Lower flood risk means less disruption and lower hazard exposure.

🏚️ Earthquake Risk

Final Score: 10.0/100 ↑ Higher is Better

ℹ️ What is Earthquake Risk?Earthquake profile uses seismic zone, PGA and soil/liquefaction risk factors.

Seismic Zone

Zone II

Lower risk zone preferred

Risk Level

Low

Low preferred

Liquefaction

None

Low preferred

Scoring Breakdown

Parameter	Value	Target / Rule	Status
Seismic Zone	Zone II	II preferred	Info
Risk Level	Low	Low preferred	Info
PGA (475yr)	0.0155g	Lower preferred	Info

💡 What does this mean for you?Lower seismic hazard reduces structural and insurance risk exposure.

🌡️ Land Surface Temp

Final Score: 55.2/100 ↑ Higher is Better

ℹ️ What is Land Surface Temp?Land Surface Temperature reflects heat-island intensity from satellite thermal bands.

LST Mean

31.2°C

Lower better

LST Min

20.7°C

Context

LST Max

41.5°C

Lower better

Scoring Breakdown

Parameter	Value	Target / Rule	Status
LST Mean	31.2°C	20°C best / 45°C worst	Weighted by formula
LST Score	55.2	0-100	Computed

Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison

Parameter	1000m	3000m	Average (Final)
LST Mean (°C)	31.7	30.7	31.2
LST Min (°C)	22.4	19.0	20.7
LST Max (°C)	42.1	40.8	41.5
LST Score	53.2	57.2	55.2

💡 What does this mean for you?Higher heat exposure affects comfort, cooling load and health risk.

🏗️ Built-up Density

Final Score: 48.4/100 ↑ Higher is Better

ℹ️ What is Built-up Density?Built-up density measures extent of developed surface versus open space.

Built-up %

51.6%

Lower better

Open Space %

48.4%

Higher better

Built-up Score

48.4

0-100

Scoring Breakdown

Parameter	Value	Target / Rule	Status
Built-up %	51.6%	Inverse scoring	Score = 100 - builtup%
Open Space %	48.4%	Context	Info

Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison

Parameter	1000m	3000m	Average (Final)
Built-up %	70.2%	33.0%	51.6%
Open Space %	29.9%	67.0%	48.4%
Built-up Score	29.9	67.0	48.4

💡 What does this mean for you?Very high built-up often raises heat and runoff while reducing open environmental buffers.

💡 Night-time Lights

Final Score: 39.6/100 ↑ Higher is Better

ℹ️ What is Night-time Lights?Nighttime lights are a proxy for economic activity and electrification intensity.

Avg Radiance

19.78

Higher better

Max Radiance

31.20

Context

NTL Score

39.6

0-100

Scoring Breakdown

Parameter	Value	Target / Rule	Status
Avg Radiance	19.78	Scaled to 50	Score = min(100, avg/50*100)
NTL Score	39.6	0-100	Computed

Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison

Parameter	1000m	3000m	Average (Final)
Avg Radiance	24.44	15.13	19.78
Max Radiance	39.05	23.35	31.20
NTL Score	48.9	30.3	39.6

💡 What does this mean for you?Higher radiance often indicates stronger urban activity but can correlate with light pollution.

🏞️ Water Bodies

Final Score: 100.0/100 ↑ Higher is Better

ℹ️ What is Water Bodies?Water-bodies score reflects permanent and seasonal water presence in the analysis radius.

Permanent Water

40.66%

Higher generally better

Seasonal Water

94.68%

Context

Water Score

100.0

0-100

Scoring Breakdown

Parameter	Value	Target / Rule	Status
Permanent Water %	40.66%	70% weight	Scaled against 10%
Seasonal Water %	94.68%	30% weight	Scaled against 20%
Water Score	100.0	0-100	Computed

Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison

Parameter	1000m	3000m	Average (Final)
Permanent Water %	34.27%	47.05%	40.66%
Seasonal Water %	94.41%	94.94%	94.68%
Water Score	100.0	100.0	100.0

💡 What does this mean for you?Water presence can support cooling, recharge and ecological quality.

👥 Population Density

Final Score: 76.2/100 ↑ Higher is Better

ℹ️ What is Population Density?Population density indicates urban crowding pressure around the area.

Population

58,099

Estimated residents

Density/km²

4,759.4

Lower better for this score

Score

76.2

0-100

Scoring Breakdown

Parameter	Value	Target / Rule	Status
Density/km²	4,759.4	Inverse scale up to 20,000	Lower -> higher score
Score	76.2	0-100	Computed

Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison

Parameter	1000m	3000m	Average (Final)
Population Total	19,117	97,081	58,099
Density / km²	6,085.3	3,433.5	4,759.4
Pop Density Score	69.6	82.8	76.2

💡 What does this mean for you?Extremely high density can increase pressure on services and mobility.

⛲ Groundwater

Final Score: 63.2/100 ↑ Higher is Better

ℹ️ What is Groundwater?Groundwater score combines moisture, recharge, drought and trend indicators.

Soil Moisture

130.254

Higher better

Recharge

3.44

Higher better

PDSI

3.07

Higher better

Scoring Breakdown

Parameter	Value	Target / Rule	Status
Soil Moisture	130.254	30% weight	Scaled
Recharge	3.44	25% weight	Scaled
PDSI	3.07	20% weight	Scaled
SM Trend	0.0000	15% weight	Scaled
Precipitation	1,873.70	10% weight	Scaled

Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison

Parameter	1000m	3000m	Average (Final)
Soil Moisture	130.210	130.297	130.254
Recharge Estimate	3.55	3.33	3.44
PDSI	3.08	3.06	3.07
Groundwater Score	63.2	63.2	63.2

💡 What does this mean for you?Higher score suggests better long-term aquifer and moisture support conditions.

🌧️ Waterlogging

↑ Higher is Better

ℹ️ What is Waterlogging?Waterlogging combines topography, imperviousness and wetness indices across nearby grid cells.

Grid Count

418

Sampled cells

Avg Susceptibility

48.2

Lower is safer

High Risk Grids

163

High / Very High

Scoring Breakdown

Parameter	Value	Target	Status
Avg Susceptibility	48.2	< 40	Concern
Avg Slope	2.84°	> 1°	Good
Avg Impervious	9.0%	< 70%	Good

💡 What does this mean for you?Higher susceptibility and low slope increase monsoon water stagnation probability.

🚶 Walkability & Safety

↑ Higher is Better

ℹ️ What is Walkability & Safety?OSM amenity metrics reflect pedestrian, safety and urban accessibility infrastructure.

Footpaths

Higher better

Street Lamps

Higher better

Police/Fire Access

Presence

Scoring Breakdown

Parameter	Value	Target / Rule	Status
Footpaths (500m)	1	≥ 3	Concern
Sidewalk Roads (1km)	0	≥ 5	Concern
Nearest Police Station	1,700 m	≤ 2000m	Context

💡 What does this mean for you?Higher OSM accessibility/safety features generally improve everyday livability.

⚠️ Risk Factors

↑ Higher is Better

ℹ️ What is Risk Factors?Nearby hazards and sensitive risk points mapped around this area.

Total Risks

Mapped points

Scoring Breakdown

Category	Risk	Distance / Severity	Meaning
Future_threats	NH-6 Bypass Widening Zone	200 m / Critical	Properties within 30m of road face acquisition for NH widening
Water_drainage	Kharun River Flood Plain	500 m / High	Area within flood plain of Kharun river, history of 2019 flooding
Air_pollution	Brick Kilns - Tatibandh South	1500 m / High	Active brick kilns 1.5km south causing seasonal air pollution
Environmental	Old Tatibandh Dump Yard	2000 m / High	Decommissioned but not remediated landfill site, 2km from colony
Infrastructure	Unlit Patches - Tatibandh Bypass Road	300 m / Medium	Stretches of bypass road without streetlights
Environmental	Industrial Estate Effluent	800 m / Medium	Small-scale industries discharging partially treated effluent
Accessibility	No Bus Route Coverage	2000 m / Medium	Nearest city bus stop 2+ km away from interior colony
Safety_social	Cattle Colony Near Bypass	1000 m / Low	Large unauthorized cattle colony on bypass road approach

💡 What does this mean for you?Closer and severe risks can affect insurance, resale and safety comfort.

🌬️ Air Quality: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.

Component	Value	Weight/Rule	Contribution
Source	area_scores (latest by score_date)	Pipeline	Weighted model in backend

Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.

Final: See card score

💧 Water Quality: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.

Component	Value	Weight/Rule	Contribution
Source	area_scores (latest by score_date)	Pipeline	Weighted model in backend

Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.

Final: See card score

🧹 Sanitation: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.

Component	Value	Weight/Rule	Contribution
Source	area_scores (latest by score_date)	Pipeline	Weighted model in backend

Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.

Final: See card score

🛣️ Infrastructure: Infrastructure Score Formula

Formula: Composite weighted model from GHSL/ESA/VIIRS/Terrain features

Component	Value	Weight/Rule	Contribution
Urbanization index	91.76	20%	SMOD
Built-up balance	51.6%	15%	Best in moderate band
NTL stability	65.0%	15%	Power/activity consistency
Avg building height	5.99 m	10%	Vertical infra proxy
Impervious %	40.9%	10%	Moderate is optimal
Radiance	19.45	10%	Development proxy
Slope	0.10°	10%	Flatter is better
Green support	12.1%	10%	Tree + grass contribution

This is the same weighted structure used in Livability Infrastructure model.

Final: 74.72 / 100

🏥 Amenities: Amenity Score Breakdown

Formula: Each amenity category is capped at 100, final score is averaged across categories

Component	Value	Weight/Rule	Contribution
Hospitals 500m	5 * 33	Cap 100	Health access
Schools 1km	5 * 20	Cap 100	Education access
Markets 1km	5 * 33	Cap 100	Daily needs
Parks 500m	8 * 33	Cap 100	Open space
Transit 1km	3 * 50	Cap 100	Mobility

Category multipliers mirror the Livability snapshot logic.

Final: Final from amenity_scores table

🌳 Green Cover: Green Score Formula

Formula: Score = (NDVI*40%) + (Vegetation*30%) + (Dense Green*20%) + (Parks*10%)

Component	Value	Weight/Rule	Contribution
NDVI component	0.132 => 26.4	40%	10.6
Vegetation component	15.0% => 15.0	30%	4.5
Dense green component	5.8% => 11.7	20%	2.3
Parks component	8 => 100.0	10%	10.0

This matches the Livability GreenCover model weighting logic.

Final: 27.38 / 100

🔊 Noise: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.

Component	Value	Weight/Rule	Contribution
Source	area_scores (latest by score_date)	Pipeline	Weighted model in backend

Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.

Final: See card score

🌊 Flood Risk: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.

Component	Value	Weight/Rule	Contribution
Source	area_scores (latest by score_date)	Pipeline	Weighted model in backend

Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.

Final: See card score

🏚️ Earthquake Risk: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.

Component	Value	Weight/Rule	Contribution
Source	area_scores (latest by score_date)	Pipeline	Weighted model in backend

Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.

Final: See card score

🌡️ Land Surface Temp: LST Score Formula

Formula: Score = ((45 - LST Mean) / 25) * 100, clipped to [0,100]

Component	Value	Weight/Rule	Contribution
LST Mean	31.21 °C	Reference	20°C best, 45°C worst

Lower land surface temperature means better livability.

Final: 55.16 / 100

🏗️ Built-up Density: Built-up Score Formula

Formula: Score = 100 - Built-up %

Component	Value	Weight/Rule	Contribution
Built-up %	51.6%	Inverse	Lower is better

Dense concrete surfaces reduce infiltration and increase heat islands.

Final: 48.42 / 100

💡 Night-time Lights: Night-time Lights Formula

Formula: Score = min(100, (Avg Radiance / 50) * 100)

Component	Value	Weight/Rule	Contribution
Avg Radiance	19.78	Scale 0-50	Higher indicates activity

Higher night radiance generally tracks electrification and economic intensity.

Final: 39.57 / 100

🏞️ Water Bodies: Water Bodies Score Formula

Formula: Score = (Permanent Water Score * 70%) + (Seasonal Water Score * 30%)

Component	Value	Weight/Rule	Contribution
Permanent water	40.66%	70%	Scaled against 10% benchmark
Seasonal water	94.68%	30%	Scaled against 20% benchmark

Permanent water has higher score weight than seasonal water.

Final: 100.00 / 100

👥 Population Density: Population Density Formula

Formula: Score = ((20000 - density_per_km²) / 20000) * 100, clipped to [0,100]

Component	Value	Weight/Rule	Contribution
Density	4,759.4 /km²	Inverse scale	Lower density -> higher score

This follows the Livability PopulationDensity model.

Final: 76.20 / 100

⛲ Groundwater: Groundwater Score Formula

Formula: Weighted: Soil Moisture 30% + Recharge 25% + PDSI 20% + Trend 15% + Precipitation 10%

Component	Value	Weight/Rule	Contribution
Soil moisture	130.254	30%	Scaled to 0-200
Recharge estimate	3.44	25%	Scaled -200 to +400
PDSI	3.07	20%	Scaled -4 to +4
SM trend	0.0000	15%	Scaled -50 to +50
Precipitation	1,873.70	10%	Scaled 800 to 1800

Exactly reused from Livability Groundwater model logic.

Final: 63.19 / 100

🌧️ Waterlogging: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.

Component	Value	Weight/Rule	Contribution
Source	area_scores (latest by score_date)	Pipeline	Weighted model in backend

Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.

Final: See card score

🚶 Walkability & Safety: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.

Component	Value	Weight/Rule	Contribution
Source	area_scores (latest by score_date)	Pipeline	Weighted model in backend

Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.

Final: See card score

⚠️ Risk Factors: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.

Component	Value	Weight/Rule	Contribution
Source	area_scores (latest by score_date)	Pipeline	Weighted model in backend

Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.

Final: See card score

View full livability report for Tatibandh →

Compliance Status

RERA registration, filings, and compliance flags based on public CG-RERA records.

Compliance Status Based on public CG-RERA records

4 Passed

2 N/A

RERA Registration Active

Reg No. PCGRERA240624001788 — Status: New

Section 3 · Source · View Certificate · RERA Official Page

No RERA Orders

No complaints or orders found against this project

Sec 38–63 · Source

No Orders in Last 12 Months

Clean record — no complaints or orders filed

Source

Within Timeline

Target completion: 13 Feb 2029

Section 4 · Source

Quarterly Updates Not Available

No compliance snapshot data on record

Section 11 · Source

Annual Audit Not Available

No compliance snapshot data on record

Section 4(2)(l)(D) · Source

Each check is based on publicly available CG-RERA portal data as of Apr 2026. How this works →

Details

Registration, professional team, bank, promoters, and compliance history.

Registration Details

RERA Number: PCGRERA240624001788
Status: New
Project Type: Residential Plotted Development
Approved Date: 24 Jun 2024
Original End Date: 13 Feb 2029

EWS Category: NO
Construction Cost: ₹ 252838000
Land Cost: ₹ 353418000
Proposed Completion: 13 Feb 2029
Authorised Person: SUNILA CHAWLA

View on Map

Professional Team

Role	Name	License / Membership
Statutory CA	Akshay Sindhwani	437073
Quarterly CA	GURVINDER SINGH CHHABRA	415492
Engineer	Rajendra Jain	330/98
Architect	Shashikant Kujur	CA/2018/95221

Promoters

M/s raja vatika Partnership Firm

Legal Orders & Cases

RERA legal orders, complaints, and case statistics filed against this project.

Legal Orders (0)

Complaint	Applicant	Section	Date	Source	PDF
No orders found for this project.

Location

Project address, coordinates, and nearby places.

Location Details

Address: VILLAGE: JARVAY URF HIRAPUR, PATWARI HALKA: 00035, TAHSIL: RAIPUR, DISTRICT: RAIPUR (C.G.)
District: Raipur
Tehsil: Raipur
Coordinates: 21.2712011, 81.5737464 View on Map

Neighborhood Intelligence

Explore nearby infrastructure around this project. Toggle categories to show/hide on the map.

Neighborhood Map 3 km radius

RERA Projects Near VEDANTA VATIKA 30 found within 3 km

#	Project	District	Status	Distance
1	shree ram vihar	Raipur	New	0.33 km
2	Avinash pride	Raipur	New	0.47 km
3	URBAN ESTATE Phase II	Raipur	New	0.63 km
4	URBAN ESTATE	Raipur	New	0.81 km
5	HARSHIT LANDMARK (PHASE-II, BLOCK- C & D)	Raipur	Ongoing	0.86 km
6	harshit landmark (phase-i, block -a&b)	Raipur	Ongoing	0.87 km
7	PMAY OF 348 DUS AT HIRAPUR ,RAIPUR	Raipur	Ongoing	0.87 km
8	HARSHIT LANDMARK (PHASE-IV, BLOCK-G)	Raipur	Ongoing	0.91 km
9	HARSHIT LANDMARK (PHASE-III, BLOCK -E & F)	Raipur	Ongoing	0.91 km
10	R EMINENCE MALL	Raipur	Ongoing	1.28 km
11	SHRI RAM TOWERS	Raipur	Ongoing	1.39 km
12	suryoday enclave	Raipur	New	1.46 km
13	sun city	Raipur	Ongoing	1.53 km
14	govinda green	Raipur	New	1.65 km
15	CELEBRITY HOMES	Raipur	Ongoing	1.65 km
16	SHRI RAM LOTUS VALLEY	Raipur	Ongoing	1.70 km
17	v3 bAlaji green city, & balaji hights	Raipur	Ongoing	1.82 km
18	PARTHIVI PACIFIC-ROYAL WOODS	Raipur	Ongoing	1.83 km
19	fortune residency	Raipur	New	1.92 km
20	ARYAPOLIS	Raipur	Ongoing	1.99 km
21	imperial heights	Raipur	Ongoing	2.23 km
22	KANCHAN VIHAR PHASE - I	Raipur	Ongoing	2.33 km
23	kanchan vihar phase -ii	Raipur	Ongoing	2.36 km
24	CONSTRUCTION & DEVELOPMNT OF 96 LIG (G+6)&48 EWS (G+6) FLATS AT PHASE-3 KABIR NAGAR RAIPUR	Raipur	New	2.37 km
25	TIRUPATI ENCLAVE PHASE- II	Raipur	Ongoing	2.40 km
26	ishaan heightS	Raipur	New	2.47 km
27	pmay of 696(dus) at sondongri ,raipur	Raipur	Ongoing	2.48 km
28	maruti life style tower	Raipur	New	2.48 km
29	TIRUPATI ENCLAVE PHASE-03	Raipur	New	2.52 km
30	TIRUPATI ENCLAVE COMMERCIAL	Raipur	Ongoing	2.54 km

Buyer Checklist

Documents and verifications a buyer should review before purchase.

Buyer Document Verification Checklist

Key documents a buyer should verify before purchasing in this project. Items marked Available have data on Seemankan.

11/14 verified

RERA Registration Certificate Available

Confirms the project is registered with RERA CG. Verify registration number, validity dates, and project details on the RERA portal.

RERA No: PCGRERA240624001788

View Certificate View on RERA Portal
Promoter Registration Certificate Available

Builder / colonizer company registration certificate. Confirms the promoter entity is a registered firm, company, or society.

Preview Preview
Approved Building / Sanction Plan Verify Independently

Building plan sanctioned by the local authority. Verify floor count, setbacks, and FSI compliance.
Layout Plan Available

Approved layout showing plot divisions, roads, open spaces, and common areas.

Preview
Title Deed / Ownership Proof Available

Proof that the promoter legally owns the land. Verify via Sub-Registrar records.

Preview
Encumbrance Certificate Available

Confirms the property is free from legal dues, mortgages, or liens. Obtain from Sub-Registrar office.

Preview
Land Use / Diversion Certificate Available

Required if land was converted from agricultural to non-agricultural use.

Preview
Architect Certificate Available

Certification from a registered architect confirming structural plans and compliance.

View View View +8 more
Structural Engineer Certificate Available

Certification from a structural engineer confirming building safety and load-bearing capacity.

View View View +8 more
CA Financial Certificate Available

Chartered Accountant certificate on financial status, project cost estimates, and fund utilization.

Preview View View +6 more
Commencement Certificate Verify Independently

Permission to begin construction issued by the local authority after plan approval.
NOCs (No Objection Certificates) Available

NOCs from fire department, environment, water supply, electricity board, and other authorities.

View View View +5 more
Project Brochure / Specification Available

Official brochure with unit types, amenities, and specifications. Compare with actual delivery.

Preview
RERA Compliance Orders Verify Independently

Check if any orders, penalties, or directions have been issued against this project by RERA.

Risk Zone Within 5 km

Buffer zones (water bodies, airport restrictions) and risk sites (landfills, waste processing) detected within 3 km (immediate) and 5 km (extended) of the project.

Risk zones (within 5 km)

3 km: 5 3–5 km: 7

Water bodies (river/nala/lake)

3 km: 2 3–5 km: 2

Landfill / waste sites

3 km: 3 3–5 km: 5

Airport buffer overlap

3 km: 0 3–5 km: 0

Risk Zone Map (3 km & 5 km rings) Project marker centered

Water Bodies (4)

Kumhari Talab ≤3 km

Tank · 50m buffer

1.95 km
Serikhedi Talab ≤3 km

Tank · 50m buffer

2.31 km
Tatibandh Talab 3–5 km

Tank · 50m buffer

3.97 km
Tatibandh Nala 3–5 km

Nala · 20m buffer

4.6 km

Landfill / Waste Sites (8)

Jarway Transfer Station ≤3 km

Transfer station · 100m buffer

0.78 km
Gudhiyari Old Dump Site ≤3 km

Legacy dump · 500m buffer

2.09 km
Old Raipur Trenching Ground ≤3 km

Inactive landfill · 500m buffer

2.75 km
Sarora Composting / Bio-methanation Plant 3–5 km

Waste processing · 200m buffer

3.41 km
Tatibandh Legacy Dump 3–5 km

Legacy dump · 500m buffer

3.58 km
Sarora Trenching Ground 3–5 km

Active landfill · 500m buffer

3.66 km
Bhanpuri-Rawabhata Legacy Dump 3–5 km

Legacy dump · 500m buffer

4.27 km
Sarora SLRM Centre (Manikanchan Kendra) 3–5 km

Waste processing · 200m buffer

4.81 km

Reviews

Verified buyer reviews and ratings for this project.

No reviews yet. Be the first to review this project!

Login to Write a Review

You need to be signed in to submit a review for this project.