Home / RERA Projects / SAMRAJYA RESIDENCY
NEW Residential Development RERA Page Project Website
GENERATE REPORT

SAMRAJYA RESIDENCY

Compliance Status
Partial Compliance
21.2726, 81.6356 Explore area
District
Raipur
Area
—
Promoter
SHRADHA SANGHVI ,W/O ASHVIN SANGHVI
Project Information
Promoter SHRADHA SANGHVI ,W/O ASHVIN SANGHVI
Type Residential Development
Status New
Completion 28 May 2022
RERA No. PCGRERA280818000727
Registered 28 Aug 2018
Original End 31 Aug 2020
Total Units 472 · 390 sold
EWS Category NO
Construction Cost ₹ 690507000
Land Cost ₹ 249695000
Authorised Person VASUDEV PATEL
Address VILLAGE - KHAMTARAI, RAIPUR (C.G.)
At a Glance
472
Total Units
390
Units Sold
44
Unsold
39
Legal Cases
May 2022
Target Completion
100%
Completion
Amenities & Facilities (17)
0
0%
BOUNDARY WALL
100%
COMMUNITY BUILDINGS
100%
ENERGY MAANAGEMENT
100%
FIRE PROTECTION AND FIRE SAFETY REQUIREMENTS
100%
INTERNAL ROADS AND FOOTPATHS
100%
LANDSCAPING AND TREE PLANTING
100%
OPEN PARKING
100%
PLACE OF WORSHIP
0%
SECURITY SERVICE
100%
SEWERAGE
100%
SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT AND DISPOSAL
100%
STORM WATER DRAINS
100%
STREET LIGHTING
100%
TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL OF SEWERAGE AND SULLAGE WAT
100%
WATER CONSERVATION RAIN WATER HARVESTING
100%
WATER SUPPLY
100%
Project Professionals
SUMIT JAIN
STATUTORY CA
SANJEEB KUMAR JAIN
QUARTERLY CA
YESH JAIN
ENGINEER
INDRAJEET PRAJAPATI
ARCHITECT
Project Analysis

360° Project Intelligence

Comprehensive analysis across regulatory, livability, market, filing activity, and market readiness dimensions.

Regulatory
79
11 of 14 checks · Moderate Signals
Livability
65
Fafadih · Moderate Signals
Legal
39
39 legal order(s) · 18 nearby
Filing Activity
425
356 docs · 69 quarterly updates
Market Readiness
25
New · due May 2022
Area Livability

Livability of Fafadih

Eighteen environmental, infrastructure and amenity parameters for the nearest mapped area (Fafadih — 1.06 km from this project). Click any parameter for the underlying readings, thresholds and what they mean.



🏠 Livability Parameters

Latest readings for Fafadih. Only parameters with available data are shown below. Based on the latest readings for Fafadih.

B
Composite Score
64.7 /100
Good

🌬️ Air Quality

Final Score: 88.8/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Air Quality?AQI summarizes PM2.5, PM10 and gases. Lower pollution values improve public health outcomes.
AQI
78
Satisfactory
PM2.5
29.2 µg/m³
≤ 40
PM10
187.6 µg/m³
≤ 60
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
PM2.5 29.2 µg/m³ ≤ 40
Good
PM10 187.6 µg/m³ ≤ 60
Concern
NO₂ 22.3 µg/m³ ≤ 40
Good
💡 What does this mean for you?Cleaner air lowers respiratory burden and improves outdoor comfort.

💧 Water Quality

Final Score: 73.5/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Water Quality?Water quality combines chemistry, supply duration and contamination markers.
TDS
489 ppm
≤ 500
pH
6.98
6.5–8.5
Supply
4.6 hr/day
≥ 8 hr
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
TDS 489 ppm ≤ 500
Good
Fluoride 0.83 mg/L ≤ 1.0
Good
Turbidity 4.2 NTU ≤ 1
Concern
💡 What does this mean for you?Better supply quality and consistency reduces dependence on tanker/groundwater fallback.

🧹 Sanitation

Final Score: 48.4/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Sanitation?Sanitation reflects ODF status, sewage treatment and waste management regularity.
ODF
ODF+
ODF++
Sewage Coverage
38%
≥ 80%
Drainage
48%
≥ 90%
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
ODF Status ODF+ ODF++
Info
Sewage Coverage 38% ≥ 80%
Concern
Drainage Coverage 48% ≥ 90%
Concern
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher sanitation maturity lowers disease exposure and neighborhood nuisance.

🛣️ Infrastructure

Final Score: 82.2/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Infrastructure?Infrastructure score combines land use, urbanization, built form, night lights and terrain indicators.
Built-up
58.0%
Balanced band
Tree Cover
24.1%
≥ 15%
Urbanization
100.0
Higher better
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Built-up (LULC) 58.0% 40-70%
Contextual
Impervious Surface 33.8% < 70%
Good
NDVI Mean 0.300 > 0.3
Concern
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Built-up (LULC) % 51.5% 64.6% 58.0%
Tree Cover % 28.6% 19.6% 24.1%
Urbanization Index 100.0 100.0 100.0
Infra Score 81.3 83.0 83.1
💡 What does this mean for you?Balanced built + green mix usually improves long-term livability resilience.

🏥 Amenities

Final Score: 80.2/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Amenities?Amenity score captures daily-access services in walk/short-drive radii.
Hospitals 500m
0
Target ≥1
Schools 1km
8
Target ≥3
Parks 500m
1
Target ≥1
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Hospitals (500m) 0 ≥1
Concern
Schools (1km) 8 ≥3
Good
Markets (1km) 5 ≥1
Good
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher local amenity density improves convenience and walkability.

🌳 Green Cover

Final Score: 29.5/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Green Cover?NDVI and vegetation structure are measured from satellite imagery to estimate neighborhood greenery.
NDVI Mean
0.180
Greenness index
Vegetation
24.6%
% green pixels
Dense Green
9.7%
Thick canopy
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
NDVI Mean 0.180 0.5 maps to score 100
Weighted 40%
Vegetation % 24.6% Direct % (cap 100)
Weighted 30%
Dense Green % 9.7% Scaled from 50%
Weighted 20%
Parks within 500m 1 Count * 33 (cap 100)
Weighted 10%
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
NDVI Mean 0.172 0.187 0.180
Vegetation % 22.3% 27.0% 24.6%
Dense Green % 11.5% 7.9% 9.7%
Tree Canopy % 14.2% 12.9% 13.6%
Green Score 28.3 29.5 29.0
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher green metrics typically reduce heat stress and improve comfort.

🔊 Noise

Final Score: 100.0/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Noise?Noise uses measured day/night dB compared to CPCB zone limits.
Day dB
54.1
vs CPCB day limit
Night dB
49.0
vs CPCB night limit
Zone
residential
CPCB class
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Day Noise 54.1 dB ≤ 55.0 dB
Good
Night Noise 49.0 dB ≤ 45.0 dB
Concern
Nearest Highway — m Higher usually quieter
Info
💡 What does this mean for you?Chronic high noise impacts stress, sleep quality and perceived comfort.

🌊 Flood Risk

Final Score: 55.0/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Flood Risk?Flood risk combines river exposure and local waterlogging vulnerability.
Overall Risk
High
Lower is safer
River Risk
Medium
Lower is safer
Waterlogging
High
Lower is safer
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Overall Risk High Low preferred
Info
River Flood Risk Medium Low preferred
Info
Waterlogging Risk High Low preferred
Info
💡 What does this mean for you?Lower flood risk means less disruption and lower hazard exposure.

🏚️ Earthquake Risk

Final Score: 25.0/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Earthquake Risk?Earthquake profile uses seismic zone, PGA and soil/liquefaction risk factors.
Seismic Zone
Zone II
Lower risk zone preferred
Risk Level
Low-Medium
Low preferred
Liquefaction
Low
Low preferred
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Seismic Zone Zone II II preferred
Info
Risk Level Low-Medium Low preferred
Info
PGA (475yr) 0.0155g Lower preferred
Info
💡 What does this mean for you?Lower seismic hazard reduces structural and insurance risk exposure.

🌡️ Land Surface Temp

Final Score: 59.6/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Land Surface Temp?Land Surface Temperature reflects heat-island intensity from satellite thermal bands.
LST Mean
30.1°C
Lower better
LST Min
15.0°C
Context
LST Max
39.5°C
Lower better
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
LST Mean 30.1°C 20°C best / 45°C worst
Weighted by formula
LST Score 59.6 0-100
Computed
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
LST Mean (°C) 30.0 30.2 30.1
LST Min (°C) 14.2 15.8 15.0
LST Max (°C) 39.3 39.7 39.5
LST Score 60.2 59.1 59.6
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher heat exposure affects comfort, cooling load and health risk.

🏗️ Built-up Density

Final Score: 42.0/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Built-up Density?Built-up density measures extent of developed surface versus open space.
Built-up %
58.0%
Lower better
Open Space %
42.0%
Higher better
Built-up Score
42.0
0-100
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Built-up % 58.0% Inverse scoring
Score = 100 - builtup%
Open Space % 42.0% Context
Info
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Built-up % 51.5% 64.6% 58.0%
Open Space % 48.5% 35.4% 42.0%
Built-up Score 48.5 35.4 42.0
💡 What does this mean for you?Very high built-up often raises heat and runoff while reducing open environmental buffers.

💡 Night-time Lights

Final Score: 46.5/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Night-time Lights?Nighttime lights are a proxy for economic activity and electrification intensity.
Avg Radiance
23.25
Higher better
Max Radiance
36.94
Context
NTL Score
46.5
0-100
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Avg Radiance 23.25 Scaled to 50
Score = min(100, avg/50*100)
NTL Score 46.5 0-100
Computed
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Avg Radiance 22.22 24.29 23.25
Max Radiance 35.48 38.40 36.94
NTL Score 44.4 48.6 46.5
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher radiance often indicates stronger urban activity but can correlate with light pollution.

🏞️ Water Bodies

Final Score: 65.0/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Water Bodies?Water-bodies score reflects permanent and seasonal water presence in the analysis radius.
Permanent Water
23.77%
Higher generally better
Seasonal Water
97.77%
Context
Water Score
100.0
0-100
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Permanent Water % 23.77% 70% weight
Scaled against 10%
Seasonal Water % 97.77% 30% weight
Scaled against 20%
Water Score 100.0 0-100
Computed
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Permanent Water % 0.00% 47.54% 23.77%
Seasonal Water % 100.00% 95.54% 97.77%
Water Score 30.0 100.0 100.0
💡 What does this mean for you?Water presence can support cooling, recharge and ecological quality.

👥 Population Density

Final Score: 67.0/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Population Density?Population density indicates urban crowding pressure around the area.
Population
101,256
Estimated residents
Density/km²
6,610.7
Lower better for this score
Score
67.0
0-100
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Density/km² 6,610.7 Inverse scale up to 20,000
Lower -> higher score
Score 67.0 0-100
Computed
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Population Total 21,414 181,097 101,256
Density / km² 6,816.4 6,405.0 6,610.7
Pop Density Score 65.9 68.0 67.0
💡 What does this mean for you?Extremely high density can increase pressure on services and mobility.

⛲ Groundwater

Final Score: 63.5/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Groundwater?Groundwater score combines moisture, recharge, drought and trend indicators.
Soil Moisture
133.098
Higher better
Recharge
1.62
Higher better
PDSI
3.07
Higher better
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Soil Moisture 133.098 30% weight
Scaled
Recharge 1.62 25% weight
Scaled
PDSI 3.07 20% weight
Scaled
SM Trend 0.0000 15% weight
Scaled
Precipitation 1,871.67 10% weight
Scaled
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Soil Moisture 133.000 133.196 133.098
Recharge Estimate 1.60 1.64 1.62
PDSI 3.07 3.06 3.07
Groundwater Score 63.5 63.5 63.5
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher score suggests better long-term aquifer and moisture support conditions.

🌧️ Waterlogging

↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Waterlogging?Waterlogging combines topography, imperviousness and wetness indices across nearby grid cells.
Grid Count
8
Sampled cells
Avg Susceptibility
52.1
Lower is safer
High Risk Grids
5
High / Very High
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTargetStatus
Avg Susceptibility 52.1 < 40
Concern
Avg Slope 3.05° > 1°
Good
Avg Impervious 54.5% < 70%
Good
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher susceptibility and low slope increase monsoon water stagnation probability.

🚶 Walkability & Safety

↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Walkability & Safety?OSM amenity metrics reflect pedestrian, safety and urban accessibility infrastructure.
Footpaths
0
Higher better
Street Lamps
0
Higher better
Police/Fire Access
0
Presence
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Footpaths (500m) 0 ≥ 3
Concern
Sidewalk Roads (1km) 0 ≥ 5
Concern
Nearest Police Station — m ≤ 2000m
Context
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher OSM accessibility/safety features generally improve everyday livability.

⚠️ Risk Factors

↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Risk Factors?Nearby hazards and sensitive risk points mapped around this area.
Total Risks
5
Mapped points
Scoring Breakdown
CategoryRiskDistance / SeverityMeaning
Environmental Sewer Overflow Point - Fafadih Chowk 200 m / High Sewer manhole frequently overflows during monsoon creating health hazard
Land_zoning Industrial to Residential Transition 0 m / Medium Pending rezoning from industrial to residential creating uncertainty
Infrastructure Fafadih Internal Roads Damaged 150 m / Medium Colony roads damaged by heavy truck movement from industrial area
Air_pollution Fafadih Industrial Pocket 300 m / Medium Small-scale manufacturing units causing intermittent air pollution
Health_nuisance Biomedical Waste from Clinics 400 m / Medium Multiple private clinics with improper biomedical waste disposal
💡 What does this mean for you?Closer and severe risks can affect insurance, resale and safety comfort.

🌬️ Air Quality: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

💧 Water Quality: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🧹 Sanitation: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🛣️ Infrastructure: Infrastructure Score Formula

Formula: Composite weighted model from GHSL/ESA/VIIRS/Terrain features
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Urbanization index100.0020%SMOD
Built-up balance58.0%15%Best in moderate band
NTL stability68.0%15%Power/activity consistency
Avg building height7.21 m10%Vertical infra proxy
Impervious %33.8%10%Moderate is optimal
Radiance23.7410%Development proxy
Slope0.10°10%Flatter is better
Green support24.1%10%Tree + grass contribution
This is the same weighted structure used in Livability Infrastructure model.
Final: 83.14 / 100

🏥 Amenities: Amenity Score Breakdown

Formula: Each amenity category is capped at 100, final score is averaged across categories
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Hospitals 500m0 * 33Cap 100Health access
Schools 1km8 * 20Cap 100Education access
Markets 1km5 * 33Cap 100Daily needs
Parks 500m1 * 33Cap 100Open space
Transit 1km1 * 50Cap 100Mobility
Category multipliers mirror the Livability snapshot logic.
Final: Final from amenity_scores table

🌳 Green Cover: Green Score Formula

Formula: Score = (NDVI*40%) + (Vegetation*30%) + (Dense Green*20%) + (Parks*10%)
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
NDVI component0.180 => 36.040%14.4
Vegetation component24.6% => 24.630%7.4
Dense green component9.7% => 19.420%3.9
Parks component1 => 33.010%3.3
This matches the Livability GreenCover model weighting logic.
Final: 28.97 / 100

🔊 Noise: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🌊 Flood Risk: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🏚️ Earthquake Risk: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🌡️ Land Surface Temp: LST Score Formula

Formula: Score = ((45 - LST Mean) / 25) * 100, clipped to [0,100]
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
LST Mean30.09 °CReference20°C best, 45°C worst
Lower land surface temperature means better livability.
Final: 59.64 / 100

🏗️ Built-up Density: Built-up Score Formula

Formula: Score = 100 - Built-up %
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Built-up %58.0%InverseLower is better
Dense concrete surfaces reduce infiltration and increase heat islands.
Final: 41.98 / 100

💡 Night-time Lights: Night-time Lights Formula

Formula: Score = min(100, (Avg Radiance / 50) * 100)
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Avg Radiance23.25Scale 0-50Higher indicates activity
Higher night radiance generally tracks electrification and economic intensity.
Final: 46.51 / 100

🏞️ Water Bodies: Water Bodies Score Formula

Formula: Score = (Permanent Water Score * 70%) + (Seasonal Water Score * 30%)
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Permanent water23.77%70%Scaled against 10% benchmark
Seasonal water97.77%30%Scaled against 20% benchmark
Permanent water has higher score weight than seasonal water.
Final: 100.00 / 100

👥 Population Density: Population Density Formula

Formula: Score = ((20000 - density_per_km²) / 20000) * 100, clipped to [0,100]
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Density6,610.7 /km²Inverse scaleLower density -> higher score
This follows the Livability PopulationDensity model.
Final: 66.95 / 100

⛲ Groundwater: Groundwater Score Formula

Formula: Weighted: Soil Moisture 30% + Recharge 25% + PDSI 20% + Trend 15% + Precipitation 10%
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Soil moisture133.09830%Scaled to 0-200
Recharge estimate1.6225%Scaled -200 to +400
PDSI3.0720%Scaled -4 to +4
SM trend0.000015%Scaled -50 to +50
Precipitation1,871.6710%Scaled 800 to 1800
Exactly reused from Livability Groundwater model logic.
Final: 63.53 / 100

🌧️ Waterlogging: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🚶 Walkability & Safety: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

⚠️ Risk Factors: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

View full livability report for Fafadih →

Compliance Status

RERA registration, filings, and compliance flags based on public CG-RERA records.

Compliance Status Based on public CG-RERA records
2 Passed
1 Warning
1 Issue(s)
2 N/A
RERA Registration Active
Reg No. PCGRERA280818000727 — Status: New
Section 3 · Source · RERA Official Page
No Penalty Orders
39 order(s) on record, none with penalty sections (Sec 38/39/40/59/61/63)
Sec 38–63 · Source
22 Order(s) in Last 12 Months
Recent: M-PRO-2025-03317, M-PRO-2025-03319, M-PRO-2025-03314, M-PRO-2025-03315, M-PRO-2025-03328 …
Source · M-PRO-2025-03317 · M-PRO-2025-03319 · M-PRO-2025-03314 · M-PRO-2025-03315 · M-PRO-2025-03328 · M-PRO-2025-03329 · M-PRO-2025-03321 · M-PRO-2025-03324 · M-PRO-2025-03413 · M-PRO-2025-03364 · M-PRO-2026-03484 · M-PRO-2025-03415 · M-PRO-2025-03358 · M-PRO-2025-03357 · M-PRO-2025-03354 · M-PRO-2025-03353 · M-PRO-2026-03485 · M-PRO-2025-03360 · M-PRO-2025-03359 · M-PRO-2025-03362 · M-PRO-2025-03372 · M-PRO-2025-03361
Completion Overdue
Was due 28 May 2022 — overdue by ~48 month(s)
Section 4 · Source
Quarterly Updates Not Available
No compliance snapshot data on record
Section 11 · Source
Annual Audit Not Available
No compliance snapshot data on record
Section 4(2)(l)(D) · Source
Each check is based on publicly available CG-RERA portal data as of Apr 2026. How this works →

Details

Registration, professional team, bank, promoters, and compliance history.

Registration Details
RERA Number
PCGRERA280818000727
Status
New
Project Type
Residential Development
Approved Date
28 Aug 2018
Original End Date
31 Aug 2020
EWS Category
NO
Construction Cost
₹ 690507000
Land Cost
₹ 249695000
Proposed Completion
28 May 2022
Authorised Person
VASUDEV PATEL
View on Map
Professional Team
RoleNameLicense / Membership
Statutory CA SUMIT JAIN 411593
Quarterly CA SANJEEB KUMAR JAIN 422298
Engineer Yesh Jain 525/2009
Architect Indrajeet Prajapati CA/2010/49841
Promoters
S
SHRADHA SANGHVI ,W/O ASHVIN SANGHVI
S
SUBHAS PATEL
T
TANKU KANAK SURESH, S/O TANKU MAHARJ JI RAO
S
SATYANARAYAN
U
UTKARSH SINGH S/O RAJESH SINGH
J
JIGNESH DOSHI
J
JHARNA RATHOD W/O JITESH RATHOD
A
ABHISHEK CHATTARJEE
S
SUNIL KUMAR TIWARI S/O SHIV PRASAD TIWARI
J
JAISHREE MESHRI
S
SUMIT LADIYA, S/O GIRADHARI LAL LADIYA
P
PARITALA AMRESHWARI ,W/O P PRASAD RAO
N
NITIN BISEN S/O HIRESHCHANDRA BISEN
S
SARITA SAHU ,W/O NILESH KUMAR SINGH
S
SOBHA AGRWAL W/O MUKESH AGRWAL
H
HEENA PODDAR
S
SAROJ PANDEY S/O ARUN PANDEY
P
PRAIYANK KUMARI,W/O KULDEEP JAIN
A
AADHARSHILA DEVELOPERS THRO-VASUDEV PATEL
K
KANDIRAM KRISHNA RAO S/O KANDI APLLA NAIDU
D
DILIP KUMAR
A
AASHISH BHANDARI W/O JHON VECTOR
N
NISHA PANDEY
P
POOJA MISHRA D/O SANGAM LAL MISHRA
S
SUSHIL VAGHELA
D
DARSHNA DOSHI W/O KETAN SOSHI
S
SOUMIC SHIT S/O ANAND KUMAR SHIT
K
KAMINI DESAI W/O AADESH DESAI
S
SANDEEP BANKA S/O BABULAL BANKA
K
KIRAN J. VYAS
P
PRATAP KISHOR
A
AADHARSHILA DEVELOPERS Partnership Firm
A
AADHARSHILA DEVELOPERS
S
SULOCHNA DEVI CHIRANIYA ,W/O SHYAM LAL CHIRANIYA
N
NARESH KUMAR AGRWAL S/O TARACHAND AGRWAL
A
ANJANA SHARMA
D
DIMPAL JHAJHARIA
N
NATHMAL MOHTA

Legal Orders & Cases

RERA legal orders, complaints, and case statistics filed against this project.

39
Total Cases
22
Last 12 Months
17
Older Cases
39
PDFs Available
Legal Orders (39)
ComplaintApplicantSectionDateSourcePDF
M-PRO-2025-03317 M/S AADHARSHILA DEVELOPERS - 06 Apr 2026 This project
M-PRO-2025-03319 M/S AADHARSHILA DEVELOPERS - 06 Apr 2026 This project
M-PRO-2025-03314 M/S AADHARSHILA DEVELOPERS - 06 Apr 2026 This project
M-PRO-2025-03315 M/S AADHARSHILA DEVELOPERS - 06 Apr 2026 This project
M-PRO-2025-03328 M/S AADHARSHILA DEVELOPERS - 06 Apr 2026 This project
M-PRO-2025-03329 M/S AADHARSHILA DEVELOPERS - 06 Apr 2026 This project
M-PRO-2025-03321 M/S AADHARSHILA DEVELOPERS - 06 Apr 2026 This project
M-PRO-2025-03324 M/S AADHARSHILA DEVELOPERS - 06 Apr 2026 This project
M-PRO-2025-03413 M/S AADHARSHILA DEVELOPERS - 02 Apr 2026 This project
M-PRO-2025-03364 M/S AADHARSHILA DEVELOPERS - 02 Apr 2026 This project
M-PRO-2026-03484 M/S AADHARSHILA DEVELOPERS - 02 Apr 2026 This project
M-PRO-2025-03415 M/S AADHARSHILA DEVELOPERS - 02 Apr 2026 This project
M-PRO-2025-03358 M/S AADHARSHILA DEVELOPERS - 02 Apr 2026 This project
M-PRO-2025-03357 M/S AADHARSHILA DEVELOPERS - 02 Apr 2026 This project
M-PRO-2025-03354 M/S AADHARSHILA DEVELOPERS - 02 Apr 2026 This project
M-PRO-2025-03353 M/S AADHARSHILA DEVELOPERS - 02 Apr 2026 This project
M-PRO-2026-03485 M/S AADHARSHILA DEVELOPERS - 02 Apr 2026 This project
M-PRO-2025-03360 M/S AADHARSHILA DEVELOPERS - 02 Apr 2026 This project
M-PRO-2025-03359 M/S AADHARSHILA DEVELOPERS - 02 Apr 2026 This project
M-PRO-2025-03362 M/S AADHARSHILA DEVELOPERS - 02 Apr 2026 This project
M-PRO-2025-03372 M/S AADHARSHILA DEVELOPERS - 02 Apr 2026 This project
M-PRO-2025-03361 M/S AADHARSHILA DEVELOPERS - 02 Apr 2026 This project
M-PRO-2025-02651 M/S AADHARSHILA DEVELOPERS Section 17,Section 18,Section 19 28 Mar 2025 This project
M-PRO-2025-02650 M/S AADHARSHILA DEVELOPERS Section 17,Section 18,Section 19 28 Mar 2025 This project
M-PRO-2025-02649 M/S AADHARSHILA DEVELOPERS Section 17,Section 18,Section 19 28 Mar 2025 This project
M-PRO-2025-02648 M/S AADHARSHILA DEVELOPERS Section 17,Section 18,Section 19 28 Mar 2025 This project
M-PRO-2025-02647 M/S AADHARSHILA DEVELOPERS Section 17,Section 18,Section 19 28 Mar 2025 This project
M-PRO-2025-02646 M/S AADHARSHILA DEVELOPERS Section 17,Section 18,Section 19 28 Mar 2025 This project
M-PRO-2025-02645 M/S AADHARSHILA DEVELOPERS Section 17,Section 18,Section 19 28 Mar 2025 This project
M-PRO-2025-02644 M/S AADHARSHILA DEVELOPERS Section 17,Section 18,Section 19 28 Mar 2025 This project
M-PRO-2025-02640 M/S AADHARSHILA DEVELOPERS Section 17,Section 18,Section 19 28 Mar 2025 This project
M-PRO-2025-02639 M/S AADHARSHILA DEVELOPERS Section 17,Section 18,Section 19 28 Mar 2025 This project
M-PRO-2025-02642 M/S AADHARSHILA DEVELOPERS - 29 Jan 2025 This project
M-PRO-2025-02641 M/S AADHARSHILA DEVELOPERS - 29 Jan 2025 This project
M-PRO-2025-02643 M/S AADHARSHILA DEVELOPERS - 29 Jan 2025 This project
M-PRO-2024-02399 SAMRAJYA RESIDENCY RESIDENTIAL COOPERATIVE SOCIETY Section 11 09 Oct 2024 This project
M-PRO-2024-02377 KIRAN J VYAS Section 19 26 Jul 2024 This project
SM-EXP-2023-02064 CG-RERA - 07 Feb 2024 This project
M-COM-2019-00564 CG-RERA - 22 Jun 2019 This project

Location

Project address, coordinates, and nearby places.

Location Details
Address
VILLAGE - KHAMTARAI, RAIPUR (C.G.)
District
Raipur
Tehsil
Raipur
Coordinates
21.2725856, 81.6355786 View on Map
Neighborhood Intelligence

Explore nearby infrastructure around this project. Toggle categories to show/hide on the map.

Neighborhood Map 3 km radius
RERA Projects Near SAMRAJYA RESIDENCY 18 found within 3 km
# Project District Status Distance
1 LALGANGA MIDAS Raipur Ongoing 1.03 km
2 ashapura homes Raipur Ongoing 1.15 km
3 ANUGRAH RESIDENCY Raipur Ongoing 1.65 km
4 RAJARIA INDUSTRIAL EUIPMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED Raipur Ongoing 1.77 km
5 RAHEJA TOWER Raipur Ongoing 1.86 km
6 SIMRAN HEIGHTS Raipur Ongoing 2.01 km
7 PITHALIA PLAZA Raipur Ongoing 2.06 km
8 O2 business center Raipur Ongoing 2.20 km
9 merlin jayshree vihar (phase-ii) Raipur Ongoing 2.34 km
10 BRIGHT ENCLAVE Raipur Ongoing 2.37 km
11 C.G. ELITE Raipur Ongoing 2.58 km
12 AKANKSHA PARISAR Raipur Ongoing 2.68 km
13 GULMOHAR PARK Raipur Ongoing 2.76 km
14 KAVISH ENCLAVE Raipur New 2.81 km
15 mansarovar residency Raipur Ongoing 2.84 km
16 pmay of 280(dus) at kata chirhuldih ,raipur Raipur Ongoing 2.91 km
17 ANAND ARCADE Raipur Ongoing 2.93 km
18 USHA ESTATES Raipur New 3.00 km

Buyer Checklist

Documents and verifications a buyer should review before purchase.

Buyer Document Verification Checklist

Key documents a buyer should verify before purchasing in this project. Items marked Available have data on Seemankan.

12/14 verified
  • RERA Registration Certificate Available
    Confirms the project is registered with RERA CG. Verify registration number, validity dates, and project details on the RERA portal.
    RERA No: PCGRERA280818000727
    View on RERA Portal
  • Promoter Registration Certificate Available
    Builder / colonizer company registration certificate. Confirms the promoter entity is a registered firm, company, or society.
    Preview Preview
  • Approved Building / Sanction Plan Available
    Building plan sanctioned by the local authority. Verify floor count, setbacks, and FSI compliance.
    Preview
  • Layout Plan Available
    Approved layout showing plot divisions, roads, open spaces, and common areas.
    Preview
  • Title Deed / Ownership Proof Available
    Proof that the promoter legally owns the land. Verify via Sub-Registrar records.
    Preview
  • Encumbrance Certificate Available
    Confirms the property is free from legal dues, mortgages, or liens. Obtain from Sub-Registrar office.
    Preview
  • Land Use / Diversion Certificate Verify Independently
    Required if land was converted from agricultural to non-agricultural use.
  • Architect Certificate Available
    Certification from a registered architect confirming structural plans and compliance.
    View View View +19 more
  • Structural Engineer Certificate Available
    Certification from a structural engineer confirming building safety and load-bearing capacity.
    View View View +19 more
  • CA Financial Certificate Available
    Chartered Accountant certificate on financial status, project cost estimates, and fund utilization.
    Preview View View +22 more
  • Commencement Certificate Available
    Permission to begin construction issued by the local authority after plan approval.
    Download Download Download +1 more
  • NOCs (No Objection Certificates) Verify Independently
    NOCs from fire department, environment, water supply, electricity board, and other authorities.
  • Project Brochure / Specification Available
    Official brochure with unit types, amenities, and specifications. Compare with actual delivery.
    View View View +23 more
  • RERA Compliance Orders Available
    Check if any orders, penalties, or directions have been issued against this project by RERA.
    39 order(s) on record — review in Legal tab
Disclaimer: This checklist is for informational purposes only. "Available" means Seemankan has a copy from the RERA portal — it does not constitute legal verification. Always verify original documents with the concerned authorities and consult a legal advisor before making a purchase decision.

Risk Zone Within 5 km

Buffer zones (water bodies, airport restrictions) and risk sites (landfills, waste processing) detected within 3 km (immediate) and 5 km (extended) of the project.

28
Risk zones (within 5 km)
3 km: 9 3–5 km: 19
21
Water bodies (river/nala/lake)
3 km: 9 3–5 km: 12
7
Landfill / waste sites
3 km: 0 3–5 km: 7
0
Airport buffer overlap
3 km: 0 3–5 km: 0
Risk Zone Map (3 km & 5 km rings) Project marker centered
Water Bodies (21)
  • Mowa Nala ≤3 km
    Nala · 20m buffer
    1.29 km
  • Boriyakhurd Talab ≤3 km
    Tank · 50m buffer
    1.38 km
  • Mowa Talab ≤3 km
    Tank · 50m buffer
    1.44 km
  • Maharajband Talab ≤3 km
    Tank · 50m buffer
    1.62 km
  • Tatibandh Nala ≤3 km
    Nala · 20m buffer
    1.84 km
  • Tatibandh Talab ≤3 km
    Tank · 50m buffer
    2.44 km
  • Sarora Talab ≤3 km
    Pond · 50m buffer
    2.82 km
  • Kankali Talab ≤3 km
    Tank · 50m buffer
    2.85 km
Landfill / Waste Sites (7)
  • Sarora SLRM Centre (Manikanchan Kendra) 3–5 km
    Waste processing · 200m buffer
    3.16 km
  • SLRM Centre Tendua (Tundra) 3–5 km
    Waste processing · 200m buffer
    3.33 km
  • Tatibandh Legacy Dump 3–5 km
    Legacy dump · 500m buffer
    3.46 km
  • Purena-Birgaon Legacy Dump 3–5 km
    Legacy dump · 500m buffer
    3.77 km
  • Daldal Seoni MSW Transfer Station 3–5 km
    Transfer station · 100m buffer
    4.52 km
  • Gudhiyari Old Dump Site 3–5 km
    Legacy dump · 500m buffer
    4.93 km
  • SLRM Centre Achcholi-Birgaon 3–5 km
    Waste processing · 200m buffer
    4.96 km

Reviews

Verified buyer reviews and ratings for this project.

No reviews yet. Be the first to review this project!

Login to Write a Review

You need to be signed in to submit a review for this project.

Login or Register