You're viewing a preview. Log in or create a free account to see the full page.
RealEstateIQTM
IN हिन्दी
Login Sign Up Free
Want a full project intelligence report? Download a detailed PDF report — RERA compliance, promoter, financials, amenities, location & risk.
Generate Project Report
Home / RERA Projects / RISHABH DEV PARISAR
NOT REGISTERED RERA Page
GENERATE REPORT

RISHABH DEV PARISAR

21.1912, 81.2717 Explore area
District
—
Area
Shiv Para
Promoter
SMT SUNITA SURANA
Project Information
Promoter SMT SUNITA SURANA
Type —
Status Not Registered
Completion —
RERA No. —
Registered —
Address 57RC+FMG, Shiv Para, Durg, Chhattisgarh 491001, India
At a Glance
-
Total Units
-
Units Sold
-
Unsold
1
Legal Cases
-
Target Completion
-
Completion
Amenities & Facilities (6)
3km Nearby Commercial (20)
100%
3km Nearby Connectivity (1)
8%
3km Nearby Hospitals (20)
100%
3km Nearby Parks (20)
100%
3km Nearby Restaurants (20)
100%
3km Nearby Schools (20)
100%
Project Analysis

360° Project Intelligence

Comprehensive analysis across regulatory, livability, market, filing activity, and market readiness dimensions.

Regulatory
0
0 of 14 checks · Weak Signals
Livability
73
Adarsh Nagar · Moderate Signals
Legal
1
1 legal order(s) · 23 nearby
Filing Activity
0
0 docs · 0 quarterly updates
Market Readiness
25
Not Registered
Area Livability

Livability of Adarsh Nagar

Eighteen environmental, infrastructure and amenity parameters for the nearest mapped area (Adarsh Nagar — 0.49 km from this project). Click any parameter for the underlying readings, thresholds and what they mean.



🏠 Livability Parameters

Latest readings for Adarsh Nagar. Only parameters with available data are shown below. Based on the latest readings for Adarsh Nagar.

B
Composite Score
73.0 /100
Good

🌬️ Air Quality

Final Score: 96.8/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Air Quality?AQI summarizes PM2.5, PM10 and gases. Lower pollution values improve public health outcomes.
AQI
58
Satisfactory
PM2.5
27.3 µg/m³
≤ 40
PM10
48.9 µg/m³
≤ 60
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
PM2.5 27.3 µg/m³ ≤ 40
Good
PM10 48.9 µg/m³ ≤ 60
Good
NO₂ 34.5 µg/m³ ≤ 40
Good
💡 What does this mean for you?Cleaner air lowers respiratory burden and improves outdoor comfort.

💧 Water Quality

Final Score: 75.0/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Water Quality?Water quality combines chemistry, supply duration and contamination markers.
TDS
300 ppm
≤ 500
pH
7.30
6.5–8.5
Supply
6.0 hr/day
≥ 8 hr
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
TDS 300 ppm ≤ 500
Good
Fluoride 0.60 mg/L ≤ 1.0
Good
Turbidity 3.0 NTU ≤ 1
Concern
💡 What does this mean for you?Better supply quality and consistency reduces dependence on tanker/groundwater fallback.

🧹 Sanitation

Final Score: 65.8/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Sanitation?Sanitation reflects ODF status, sewage treatment and waste management regularity.
ODF
ODF+
ODF++
Sewage Coverage
55%
≥ 80%
Drainage
60%
≥ 90%
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
ODF Status ODF+ ODF++
Info
Sewage Coverage 55% ≥ 80%
Concern
Drainage Coverage 60% ≥ 90%
Concern
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher sanitation maturity lowers disease exposure and neighborhood nuisance.

🛣️ Infrastructure

Final Score: 72.6/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Infrastructure?Infrastructure score combines land use, urbanization, built form, night lights and terrain indicators.
Built-up
60.9%
Balanced band
Tree Cover
13.0%
≥ 15%
Urbanization
90.9
Higher better
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Built-up (LULC) 60.9% 40-70%
Contextual
Impervious Surface 34.6% < 70%
Good
NDVI Mean 0.260 > 0.3
Concern
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Built-up (LULC) % 75.7% 46.1% 60.9%
Tree Cover % 9.9% 16.0% 13.0%
Urbanization Index 98.7 83.0 90.9
Infra Score 77.4 67.7 76.2
💡 What does this mean for you?Balanced built + green mix usually improves long-term livability resilience.

🏥 Amenities

Final Score: 80.9/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Amenities?Amenity score captures daily-access services in walk/short-drive radii.
Hospitals 500m
3
Target ≥1
Schools 1km
20
Target ≥3
Parks 500m
2
Target ≥1
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Hospitals (500m) 3 ≥1
Good
Schools (1km) 20 ≥3
Good
Markets (1km) 20 ≥1
Good
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher local amenity density improves convenience and walkability.

🌳 Green Cover

Final Score: 45.8/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Green Cover?NDVI and vegetation structure are measured from satellite imagery to estimate neighborhood greenery.
NDVI Mean
0.205
Greenness index
Vegetation
46.6%
% green pixels
Dense Green
3.7%
Thick canopy
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
NDVI Mean 0.205 0.5 maps to score 100
Weighted 40%
Vegetation % 46.6% Direct % (cap 100)
Weighted 30%
Dense Green % 3.7% Scaled from 50%
Weighted 20%
Parks within 500m 2 Count * 33 (cap 100)
Weighted 10%
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
NDVI Mean 0.175 0.234 0.205
Vegetation % 32.8% 60.4% 46.6%
Dense Green % 1.5% 5.8% 3.7%
Tree Canopy % 1.0% 4.1% 2.6%
Green Score 31.0 45.8 38.4
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher green metrics typically reduce heat stress and improve comfort.

🔊 Noise

Final Score: 70.2/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Noise?Noise uses measured day/night dB compared to CPCB zone limits.
Day dB
51.5
vs CPCB day limit
Night dB
42.1
vs CPCB night limit
Zone
residential
CPCB class
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Day Noise 51.5 dB ≤ 55.0 dB
Good
Night Noise 42.1 dB ≤ 45.0 dB
Good
Nearest Highway 215 m Higher usually quieter
Info
💡 What does this mean for you?Chronic high noise impacts stress, sleep quality and perceived comfort.

🌊 Flood Risk

Final Score: 72.5/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Flood Risk?Flood risk combines river exposure and local waterlogging vulnerability.
Overall Risk
Low
Lower is safer
River Risk
Low
Lower is safer
Waterlogging
Low-Medium
Lower is safer
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Overall Risk Low Low preferred
Info
River Flood Risk Low Low preferred
Info
Waterlogging Risk Low-Medium Low preferred
Info
💡 What does this mean for you?Lower flood risk means less disruption and lower hazard exposure.

🏚️ Earthquake Risk

Final Score: 90.0/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Earthquake Risk?Earthquake profile uses seismic zone, PGA and soil/liquefaction risk factors.
Seismic Zone
Zone II
Lower risk zone preferred
Risk Level
Low
Low preferred
Liquefaction
None
Low preferred
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Seismic Zone Zone II II preferred
Info
Risk Level Low Low preferred
Info
PGA (475yr) 0.0155g Lower preferred
Info
💡 What does this mean for you?Lower seismic hazard reduces structural and insurance risk exposure.

🌡️ Land Surface Temp

Final Score: 68.3/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Land Surface Temp?Land Surface Temperature reflects heat-island intensity from satellite thermal bands.
LST Mean
27.9°C
Lower better
LST Min
-6.3°C
Context
LST Max
41.7°C
Lower better
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
LST Mean 27.9°C 20°C best / 45°C worst
Weighted by formula
LST Score 68.3 0-100
Computed
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
LST Mean (°C) 28.1 27.7 27.9
LST Min (°C) -6.6 -6.0 -6.3
LST Max (°C) 42.1 41.3 41.7
LST Score 67.4 69.2 68.3
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher heat exposure affects comfort, cooling load and health risk.

🏗️ Built-up Density

Final Score: 39.1/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Built-up Density?Built-up density measures extent of developed surface versus open space.
Built-up %
60.9%
Lower better
Open Space %
39.1%
Higher better
Built-up Score
39.1
0-100
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Built-up % 60.9% Inverse scoring
Score = 100 - builtup%
Open Space % 39.1% Context
Info
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Built-up % 75.7% 46.1% 60.9%
Open Space % 24.3% 53.9% 39.1%
Built-up Score 24.3 53.9 39.1
💡 What does this mean for you?Very high built-up often raises heat and runoff while reducing open environmental buffers.

💡 Night-time Lights

Final Score: 36.9/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Night-time Lights?Nighttime lights are a proxy for economic activity and electrification intensity.
Avg Radiance
18.46
Higher better
Max Radiance
29.44
Context
NTL Score
36.9
0-100
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Avg Radiance 18.46 Scaled to 50
Score = min(100, avg/50*100)
NTL Score 36.9 0-100
Computed
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Avg Radiance 22.23 14.69 18.46
Max Radiance 36.28 22.60 29.44
NTL Score 44.5 29.4 36.9
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher radiance often indicates stronger urban activity but can correlate with light pollution.

🏞️ Water Bodies

Final Score: 100.0/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Water Bodies?Water-bodies score reflects permanent and seasonal water presence in the analysis radius.
Permanent Water
75.56%
Higher generally better
Seasonal Water
97.68%
Context
Water Score
100.0
0-100
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Permanent Water % 75.56% 70% weight
Scaled against 10%
Seasonal Water % 97.68% 30% weight
Scaled against 20%
Water Score 100.0 0-100
Computed
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Permanent Water % 75.46% 75.66% 75.56%
Seasonal Water % 97.19% 98.16% 97.68%
Water Score 100.0 100.0 100.0
💡 What does this mean for you?Water presence can support cooling, recharge and ecological quality.

👥 Population Density

Final Score: 71.0/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Population Density?Population density indicates urban crowding pressure around the area.
Population
74,481
Estimated residents
Density/km²
5,811.5
Lower better for this score
Score
70.9
0-100
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Density/km² 5,811.5 Inverse scale up to 20,000
Lower -> higher score
Score 70.9 0-100
Computed
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Population Total 22,459 126,503 74,481
Density / km² 7,148.9 4,474.1 5,811.5
Pop Density Score 64.3 77.6 70.9
💡 What does this mean for you?Extremely high density can increase pressure on services and mobility.

🚶 Walkability & Safety

↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Walkability & Safety?OSM amenity metrics reflect pedestrian, safety and urban accessibility infrastructure.
Footpaths
0
Higher better
Street Lamps
0
Higher better
Police/Fire Access
1
Presence
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Footpaths (500m) 0 ≥ 3
Concern
Sidewalk Roads (1km) 0 ≥ 5
Concern
Nearest Police Station — m ≤ 2000m
Context
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher OSM accessibility/safety features generally improve everyday livability.

🌬️ Air Quality: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

💧 Water Quality: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🧹 Sanitation: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🛣️ Infrastructure: Infrastructure Score Formula

Formula: Composite weighted model from GHSL/ESA/VIIRS/Terrain features
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Urbanization index90.8720%SMOD
Built-up balance60.9%15%Best in moderate band
NTL stability67.0%15%Power/activity consistency
Avg building height6.41 m10%Vertical infra proxy
Impervious %34.6%10%Moderate is optimal
Radiance19.2610%Development proxy
Slope0.10°10%Flatter is better
Green support13.0%10%Tree + grass contribution
This is the same weighted structure used in Livability Infrastructure model.
Final: 76.23 / 100

🏥 Amenities: Amenity Score Breakdown

Formula: Each amenity category is capped at 100, final score is averaged across categories
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Hospitals 500m3 * 33Cap 100Health access
Schools 1km20 * 20Cap 100Education access
Markets 1km20 * 33Cap 100Daily needs
Parks 500m2 * 33Cap 100Open space
Transit 1km0 * 50Cap 100Mobility
Category multipliers mirror the Livability snapshot logic.
Final: Final from amenity_scores table

🌳 Green Cover: Green Score Formula

Formula: Score = (NDVI*40%) + (Vegetation*30%) + (Dense Green*20%) + (Parks*10%)
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
NDVI component0.205 => 41.040%16.4
Vegetation component46.6% => 46.630%14.0
Dense green component3.7% => 7.320%1.5
Parks component2 => 66.010%6.6
This matches the Livability GreenCover model weighting logic.
Final: 38.44 / 100

🔊 Noise: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🌊 Flood Risk: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🏚️ Earthquake Risk: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🌡️ Land Surface Temp: LST Score Formula

Formula: Score = ((45 - LST Mean) / 25) * 100, clipped to [0,100]
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
LST Mean27.92 °CReference20°C best, 45°C worst
Lower land surface temperature means better livability.
Final: 68.32 / 100

🏗️ Built-up Density: Built-up Score Formula

Formula: Score = 100 - Built-up %
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Built-up %60.9%InverseLower is better
Dense concrete surfaces reduce infiltration and increase heat islands.
Final: 39.10 / 100

💡 Night-time Lights: Night-time Lights Formula

Formula: Score = min(100, (Avg Radiance / 50) * 100)
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Avg Radiance18.46Scale 0-50Higher indicates activity
Higher night radiance generally tracks electrification and economic intensity.
Final: 36.92 / 100

🏞️ Water Bodies: Water Bodies Score Formula

Formula: Score = (Permanent Water Score * 70%) + (Seasonal Water Score * 30%)
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Permanent water75.56%70%Scaled against 10% benchmark
Seasonal water97.68%30%Scaled against 20% benchmark
Permanent water has higher score weight than seasonal water.
Final: 100.00 / 100

👥 Population Density: Population Density Formula

Formula: Score = ((20000 - density_per_km²) / 20000) * 100, clipped to [0,100]
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Density5,811.5 /km²Inverse scaleLower density -> higher score
This follows the Livability PopulationDensity model.
Final: 70.94 / 100

🚶 Walkability & Safety: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

View full livability report for Adarsh Nagar →

Compliance Status

RERA registration, filings, and compliance flags based on public CG-RERA records.

Compliance Status Based on public CG-RERA records
2 Passed
4 N/A
Registration Status Unknown
Status not available on CG-RERA portal
Section 3 · Source
No Penalty Orders
1 order(s) on record, none with penalty sections (Sec 38/39/40/59/61/63)
Sec 38–63 · Source
No Recent Orders
No orders filed in the last 12 months (older: 1)
Source
Completion Date Not Available
No proposed completion date on CG-RERA portal
Section 4 · Source
Quarterly Updates Not Available
No compliance snapshot data on record
Section 11 · Source
Annual Audit Not Available
No compliance snapshot data on record
Section 4(2)(l)(D) · Source
Each check is based on publicly available CG-RERA portal data as of Nov 2026. How this works →

Details

Registration, professional team, bank, promoters, and compliance history.

Registration Details
RERA Number
-
Status
Not Registered
Project Type
-
View on Map
Promoters
S
SMT SUNITA SURANA

Buildings & Units

Inventory overview, sold/unsold breakdown, and building details.

No unit data available yet.
Run the RERA detail scraper to populate this section.

Legal Orders & Cases

RERA legal orders, complaints, and case statistics filed against this project.

1
Total Cases
0
Last 12 Months
1
Older Cases
1
PDFs Available
Legal Orders (1)
ComplaintApplicantSectionDateSourcePDF
SM-PRO-2021-01393 CG-RERA Section 3 20 Jul 2021 This project

Location

Project address, coordinates, and nearby places.

Location Details
Address
57RC+FMG, Shiv Para, Durg, Chhattisgarh 491001, India
District
-
Tehsil
-
Coordinates
21.1911999, 81.2717000 View on Map
Stored 3km Amenities (Latest Refresh)
Amenity Count Coverage
3km Nearby Commercial 20 100%
3km Nearby Connectivity 1 8%
3km Nearby Hospitals 20 100%
3km Nearby Parks 20 100%
3km Nearby Restaurants 20 100%
3km Nearby Schools 20 100%
Area Livability

Livability of Adarsh Nagar Durg

Environmental, infrastructure & amenity parameters for the area where this project is located (0.49 km from project). Each value is compared with the Durg average.

Composite Livability Score
73.0 / 100
Grade B · Good
+2.2 vs Durg avg (70.8)
Air Quality
96.8 Excellent
Area
97
City
98
-0.7 vs city avg
Water Quality
75.0 Good
Area
75
City
73
+2.0 vs city avg
Sanitation
65.8 Good
Area
66
City
62
+4.2 vs city avg
Green Cover
45.8 Below Avg
Area
46
City
43
+2.5 vs city avg
Noise Level
70.2 Good
Area
70
City
73
-2.4 vs city avg
Infrastructure
72.6 Good
Area
73
City
69
+3.8 vs city avg
Amenities
80.9 Excellent
Area
81
City
73
+7.9 vs city avg
Flood Safety
72.5 Good
Area
73
City
70
+3.0 vs city avg
Earthquake Safety
90.0 Excellent
Area
90
City
90
+0.0 vs city avg
Land Surface Temp.
68.3 Good
Area
68
City
67
+1.1 vs city avg
Built-up Density
39.1 Below Avg
Area
39
City
48
-9.0 vs city avg
Night-light Activity
36.9 Below Avg
Area
37
City
33
+4.0 vs city avg
Water Bodies Nearby
100.0 Excellent
Area
100
City
95
+5.2 vs city avg
Population Density
71.0 Good
Area
71
City
73
-1.6 vs city avg
Groundwater Status
58.0 Average
Area
58
City
58
-0.2 vs city avg
View detailed livability report for Adarsh Nagar
Neighborhood Intelligence

Explore nearby infrastructure around this project. Toggle categories to show/hide on the map.

Neighborhood Map 3 km radius
RERA Projects Near rishabh dev parisar 23 found within 3 km
# Project District Status Distance
1 BANDHA TALAB Durg New 0.55 km
2 rishabh vihar Durg New 0.94 km
3 dwarika niwas Durg New 1.10 km
4 MAHAVIR BUSINESS PARK Durg New 1.25 km
5 JAINAM HEIGHTS Durg Ongoing 1.29 km
6 YUG HOMES Durg New 1.44 km
7 RISHABH NAGAR PHASE -III Durg Ongoing 1.45 km
8 VARDHMAN HEIGHTS Durg Ongoing 1.46 km
9 RISHABH PRIDE Durg Ongoing 1.48 km
10 navkar residency Durg New 1.71 km
11 RISHABH GREEN CITY PHASE -III Durg Ongoing 2.13 km
12 nayantara dreams Durg New 2.22 km
13 CONSTRUCTION OF 18 SRHIG, 41 HIG, 96 MIG, 196 LIG, 95 EWS HOUSES (446 HOUSES), 36 UTILITY SHOP, 14 K Durg New 2.40 km
14 ROYAL PARK Durg New 2.52 km
15 Business park Durg New 2.63 km
16 durg trade center Durg New 2.63 km
17 RISHABH SOUTH CITY Durg Ongoing 2.66 km
18 PMAY 116 dUS AT POTIYAKALA ,DURG Durg New 2.72 km
19 mahaveers durg trade centre Durg New 2.75 km
20 ROYAL GREEN PHASE- 1 Durg New 2.81 km
21 royal green Durg New 2.86 km
22 Utopia township project Durg New 2.92 km
23 BHAAVBHUMI Durg New 2.97 km

Buyer Checklist

Documents and verifications a buyer should review before purchase.

Buyer Document Verification Checklist

Key documents a buyer should verify before purchasing in this project. Items marked Available have data on Seemankan.

1/14 verified
  • RERA Registration Certificate Verify Independently
    Confirms the project is registered with RERA CG. Verify registration number, validity dates, and project details on the RERA portal.
  • Promoter Registration Certificate Verify Independently
    Builder / colonizer company registration certificate. Confirms the promoter entity is a registered firm, company, or society.
  • Approved Building / Sanction Plan Verify Independently
    Building plan sanctioned by the local authority. Verify floor count, setbacks, and FSI compliance.
  • Layout Plan Verify Independently
    Approved layout showing plot divisions, roads, open spaces, and common areas.
  • Title Deed / Ownership Proof Verify Independently
    Proof that the promoter legally owns the land. Verify via Sub-Registrar records.
  • Encumbrance Certificate Verify Independently
    Confirms the property is free from legal dues, mortgages, or liens. Obtain from Sub-Registrar office.
  • Land Use / Diversion Certificate Verify Independently
    Required if land was converted from agricultural to non-agricultural use.
  • Architect Certificate Verify Independently
    Certification from a registered architect confirming structural plans and compliance.
  • Structural Engineer Certificate Verify Independently
    Certification from a structural engineer confirming building safety and load-bearing capacity.
  • CA Financial Certificate Verify Independently
    Chartered Accountant certificate on financial status, project cost estimates, and fund utilization.
  • Commencement Certificate Verify Independently
    Permission to begin construction issued by the local authority after plan approval.
  • NOCs (No Objection Certificates) Verify Independently
    NOCs from fire department, environment, water supply, electricity board, and other authorities.
  • Project Brochure / Specification Verify Independently
    Official brochure with unit types, amenities, and specifications. Compare with actual delivery.
  • RERA Compliance Orders Available
    Check if any orders, penalties, or directions have been issued against this project by RERA.
    1 order(s) on record — review in Legal tab
Disclaimer: This checklist is for informational purposes only. "Available" means Seemankan has a copy from the RERA portal — it does not constitute legal verification. Always verify original documents with the concerned authorities and consult a legal advisor before making a purchase decision.

Risk Zone Within 5 km

Buffer zones (water bodies, airport restrictions) and risk sites (landfills, waste processing) detected within 3 km (immediate) and 5 km (extended) of the project.

1
Risk zones (within 5 km)
3 km: 1 3–5 km: 0
0
Water bodies (river/nala/lake)
3 km: 0 3–5 km: 0
1
Landfill / waste sites
3 km: 1 3–5 km: 0
0
Airport buffer overlap
3 km: 0 3–5 km: 0
Risk Zone Map (3 km & 5 km rings) Project marker centered
Landfill / Waste Sites (1)
  • Durg Municipal Landfill — Potiya ≤3 km
    Active landfill · 500m buffer
    1.76 km

Reviews

Verified buyer reviews and ratings for this project.

No reviews yet. Be the first to review this project!

Login to Write a Review

You need to be signed in to submit a review for this project.

Login or Register

Log in to see the full page

This page shows a preview. Sign in (or create a free account) to unlock the full content, charts, and downloads.

Log in Create account