You're viewing a preview. Log in or create a free account to see the full page.
RealEstateIQTM
IN हिन्दी
Login Sign Up Free
Want a full project intelligence report? Download a detailed PDF report — RERA compliance, promoter, financials, amenities, location & risk.
Generate Project Report
Home / RERA Projects / PRATYAKSHA HOMES
ONGOING Mixed Development RERA Page Project Website
GENERATE REPORT

PRATYAKSHA HOMES

Compliance Status
Partial Compliance
22.0881, 82.1229 Explore area
District
Bilaspur
Area
Bilaspur
Promoter
RAMESH AGRAWAL
Project Information
Promoter RAMESH AGRAWAL
Type Mixed Development
Status Ongoing
Completion 30 Jun 2019
RERA No. PCGRERA280818000723
Registered 28 Aug 2018
Original End 30 Jun 2019
EWS Category NO
Construction Cost ₹ 17500000
Land Cost ₹ 3900000
Authorised Person RAMESH AGRAWAL
Address GURU AMERI RAOD, MAHARAN PRATAP NAGAR, TIFRA BILASPUR
At a Glance
-
Total Units
-
Units Sold
-
Unsold
0
Legal Cases
Jun 2019
Target Completion
100%
Completion
Amenities & Facilities (6)
3km Nearby Commercial (20)
100%
3km Nearby Connectivity (1)
8%
3km Nearby Hospitals (20)
100%
3km Nearby Parks (20)
100%
3km Nearby Restaurants (20)
100%
3km Nearby Schools (20)
100%
Project Professionals
KUSHAL AGRAWAL
STATUTORY CA
Project Analysis

360° Project Intelligence

Comprehensive analysis across regulatory, livability, market, filing activity, and market readiness dimensions.

Regulatory
86
12 of 14 checks · Strong Signals
Livability
71
Mangla · Moderate Signals
Legal
0
No legal orders on record · 30 nearby
Filing Activity
109
97 docs · 12 quarterly updates
Market Readiness
35
Ongoing · due Jun 2019
Area Livability

Livability of Mangla

Eighteen environmental, infrastructure and amenity parameters for the nearest mapped area (Mangla — 0.65 km from this project). Click any parameter for the underlying readings, thresholds and what they mean.



🏠 Livability Parameters

Latest readings for Mangla. Only parameters with available data are shown below. Based on the latest readings for Mangla.

B
Composite Score
71.3 /100
Good

🌬️ Air Quality

Final Score: 79.2/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Air Quality?AQI summarizes PM2.5, PM10 and gases. Lower pollution values improve public health outcomes.
AQI
104
Moderate
PM2.5
47.6 µg/m³
≤ 40
PM10
61.9 µg/m³
≤ 60
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
PM2.5 47.6 µg/m³ ≤ 40
Concern
PM10 61.9 µg/m³ ≤ 60
Concern
NO₂ 29.8 µg/m³ ≤ 40
Good
💡 What does this mean for you?Cleaner air lowers respiratory burden and improves outdoor comfort.

💧 Water Quality

Final Score: 65.0/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Water Quality?Water quality combines chemistry, supply duration and contamination markers.
TDS
360 ppm
≤ 500
pH
7.30
6.5–8.5
Supply
3.0 hr/day
≥ 8 hr
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
TDS 360 ppm ≤ 500
Good
Fluoride 0.60 mg/L ≤ 1.0
Good
Turbidity 3.0 NTU ≤ 1
Concern
💡 What does this mean for you?Better supply quality and consistency reduces dependence on tanker/groundwater fallback.

🧹 Sanitation

Final Score: 47.7/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Sanitation?Sanitation reflects ODF status, sewage treatment and waste management regularity.
ODF
ODF
ODF++
Sewage Coverage
32%
≥ 80%
Drainage
38%
≥ 90%
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
ODF Status ODF ODF++
Info
Sewage Coverage 32% ≥ 80%
Concern
Drainage Coverage 38% ≥ 90%
Concern
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher sanitation maturity lowers disease exposure and neighborhood nuisance.

🛣️ Infrastructure

Final Score: 74.3/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Infrastructure?Infrastructure score combines land use, urbanization, built form, night lights and terrain indicators.
Built-up
59.3%
Balanced band
Tree Cover
20.6%
≥ 15%
Urbanization
97.7
Higher better
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Built-up (LULC) 59.3% 40-70%
Contextual
Impervious Surface 17.1% < 70%
Good
NDVI Mean 0.300 > 0.3
Concern
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Built-up (LULC) % 73.1% 45.5% 59.3%
Tree Cover % 18.8% 22.3% 20.6%
Urbanization Index 100.0 95.4 97.7
Infra Score 78.2 70.4 77.1
💡 What does this mean for you?Balanced built + green mix usually improves long-term livability resilience.

🏥 Amenities

Final Score: 81.8/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Amenities?Amenity score captures daily-access services in walk/short-drive radii.
Hospitals 500m
6
Target ≥1
Schools 1km
20
Target ≥3
Parks 500m
0
Target ≥1
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Hospitals (500m) 6 ≥1
Good
Schools (1km) 20 ≥3
Good
Markets (1km) 20 ≥1
Good
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher local amenity density improves convenience and walkability.

🌳 Green Cover

Final Score: 46.5/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Green Cover?NDVI and vegetation structure are measured from satellite imagery to estimate neighborhood greenery.
NDVI Mean
0.255
Greenness index
Vegetation
71.0%
% green pixels
Dense Green
5.4%
Thick canopy
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
NDVI Mean 0.255 0.5 maps to score 100
Weighted 40%
Vegetation % 71.0% Direct % (cap 100)
Weighted 30%
Dense Green % 5.4% Scaled from 50%
Weighted 20%
Parks within 500m 0 Count * 33 (cap 100)
Weighted 10%
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
NDVI Mean 0.244 0.265 0.255
Vegetation % 66.3% 75.8% 71.0%
Dense Green % 4.3% 6.5% 5.4%
Tree Canopy % 3.0% 4.6% 3.8%
Green Score 41.1 46.5 43.9
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher green metrics typically reduce heat stress and improve comfort.

🔊 Noise

Final Score: 0.0/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Noise?Noise uses measured day/night dB compared to CPCB zone limits.
Day dB
72.4
vs CPCB day limit
Night dB
62.4
vs CPCB night limit
Zone
commercial
CPCB class
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Day Noise 72.4 dB ≤ 65.0 dB
Concern
Night Noise 62.4 dB ≤ 55.0 dB
Concern
Nearest Highway 19 m Higher usually quieter
Info
💡 What does this mean for you?Chronic high noise impacts stress, sleep quality and perceived comfort.

🌊 Flood Risk

Final Score: 72.5/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Flood Risk?Flood risk combines river exposure and local waterlogging vulnerability.
Overall Risk
Low
Lower is safer
River Risk
Low
Lower is safer
Waterlogging
Low-Medium
Lower is safer
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Overall Risk Low Low preferred
Info
River Flood Risk Low Low preferred
Info
Waterlogging Risk Low-Medium Low preferred
Info
💡 What does this mean for you?Lower flood risk means less disruption and lower hazard exposure.

🏚️ Earthquake Risk

Final Score: 90.0/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Earthquake Risk?Earthquake profile uses seismic zone, PGA and soil/liquefaction risk factors.
Seismic Zone
Zone II
Lower risk zone preferred
Risk Level
Low
Low preferred
Liquefaction
None
Low preferred
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Seismic Zone Zone II II preferred
Info
Risk Level Low Low preferred
Info
PGA (475yr) 0.0155g Lower preferred
Info
💡 What does this mean for you?Lower seismic hazard reduces structural and insurance risk exposure.

🌡️ Land Surface Temp

Final Score: 58.4/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Land Surface Temp?Land Surface Temperature reflects heat-island intensity from satellite thermal bands.
LST Mean
30.4°C
Lower better
LST Min
24.6°C
Context
LST Max
38.6°C
Lower better
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
LST Mean 30.4°C 20°C best / 45°C worst
Weighted by formula
LST Score 58.4 0-100
Computed
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
LST Mean (°C) 30.5 30.4 30.4
LST Min (°C) 24.4 24.9 24.6
LST Max (°C) 38.7 38.4 38.6
LST Score 58.2 58.6 58.4
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher heat exposure affects comfort, cooling load and health risk.

🏗️ Built-up Density

Final Score: 40.7/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Built-up Density?Built-up density measures extent of developed surface versus open space.
Built-up %
59.3%
Lower better
Open Space %
40.7%
Higher better
Built-up Score
40.7
0-100
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Built-up % 59.3% Inverse scoring
Score = 100 - builtup%
Open Space % 40.7% Context
Info
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Built-up % 73.1% 45.5% 59.3%
Open Space % 26.9% 54.5% 40.7%
Built-up Score 26.9 54.5 40.7
💡 What does this mean for you?Very high built-up often raises heat and runoff while reducing open environmental buffers.

💡 Night-time Lights

Final Score: 45.4/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Night-time Lights?Nighttime lights are a proxy for economic activity and electrification intensity.
Avg Radiance
22.68
Higher better
Max Radiance
36.38
Context
NTL Score
45.4
0-100
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Avg Radiance 22.68 Scaled to 50
Score = min(100, avg/50*100)
NTL Score 45.4 0-100
Computed
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Avg Radiance 26.18 19.18 22.68
Max Radiance 42.22 30.54 36.38
NTL Score 52.4 38.4 45.4
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher radiance often indicates stronger urban activity but can correlate with light pollution.

🏞️ Water Bodies

Final Score: 100.0/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Water Bodies?Water-bodies score reflects permanent and seasonal water presence in the analysis radius.
Permanent Water
53.91%
Higher generally better
Seasonal Water
83.91%
Context
Water Score
100.0
0-100
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Permanent Water % 53.91% 70% weight
Scaled against 10%
Seasonal Water % 83.91% 30% weight
Scaled against 20%
Water Score 100.0 0-100
Computed
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Permanent Water % 86.99% 20.82% 53.91%
Seasonal Water % 99.71% 68.11% 83.91%
Water Score 100.0 100.0 100.0
💡 What does this mean for you?Water presence can support cooling, recharge and ecological quality.

👥 Population Density

Final Score: 66.4/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Population Density?Population density indicates urban crowding pressure around the area.
Population
85,669
Estimated residents
Density/km²
6,716.9
Lower better for this score
Score
66.4
0-100
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Density/km² 6,716.9 Inverse scale up to 20,000
Lower -> higher score
Score 66.4 0-100
Computed
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Population Total 26,061 145,277 85,669
Density / km² 8,295.6 5,138.1 6,716.9
Pop Density Score 58.5 74.3 66.4
💡 What does this mean for you?Extremely high density can increase pressure on services and mobility.

🚶 Walkability & Safety

↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Walkability & Safety?OSM amenity metrics reflect pedestrian, safety and urban accessibility infrastructure.
Footpaths
0
Higher better
Street Lamps
0
Higher better
Police/Fire Access
0
Presence
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Footpaths (500m) 0 ≥ 3
Concern
Sidewalk Roads (1km) 0 ≥ 5
Concern
Nearest Police Station — m ≤ 2000m
Context
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher OSM accessibility/safety features generally improve everyday livability.

🌬️ Air Quality: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

💧 Water Quality: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🧹 Sanitation: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🛣️ Infrastructure: Infrastructure Score Formula

Formula: Composite weighted model from GHSL/ESA/VIIRS/Terrain features
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Urbanization index97.7020%SMOD
Built-up balance59.3%15%Best in moderate band
NTL stability68.0%15%Power/activity consistency
Avg building height7.17 m10%Vertical infra proxy
Impervious %17.1%10%Moderate is optimal
Radiance21.7110%Development proxy
Slope0.11°10%Flatter is better
Green support20.6%10%Tree + grass contribution
This is the same weighted structure used in Livability Infrastructure model.
Final: 77.13 / 100

🏥 Amenities: Amenity Score Breakdown

Formula: Each amenity category is capped at 100, final score is averaged across categories
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Hospitals 500m6 * 33Cap 100Health access
Schools 1km20 * 20Cap 100Education access
Markets 1km20 * 33Cap 100Daily needs
Parks 500m0 * 33Cap 100Open space
Transit 1km0 * 50Cap 100Mobility
Category multipliers mirror the Livability snapshot logic.
Final: Final from amenity_scores table

🌳 Green Cover: Green Score Formula

Formula: Score = (NDVI*40%) + (Vegetation*30%) + (Dense Green*20%) + (Parks*10%)
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
NDVI component0.255 => 51.040%20.4
Vegetation component71.0% => 71.030%21.3
Dense green component5.4% => 10.820%2.2
Parks component0 => 0.010%0.0
This matches the Livability GreenCover model weighting logic.
Final: 43.87 / 100

🔊 Noise: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🌊 Flood Risk: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🏚️ Earthquake Risk: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🌡️ Land Surface Temp: LST Score Formula

Formula: Score = ((45 - LST Mean) / 25) * 100, clipped to [0,100]
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
LST Mean30.40 °CReference20°C best, 45°C worst
Lower land surface temperature means better livability.
Final: 58.40 / 100

🏗️ Built-up Density: Built-up Score Formula

Formula: Score = 100 - Built-up %
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Built-up %59.3%InverseLower is better
Dense concrete surfaces reduce infiltration and increase heat islands.
Final: 40.73 / 100

💡 Night-time Lights: Night-time Lights Formula

Formula: Score = min(100, (Avg Radiance / 50) * 100)
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Avg Radiance22.68Scale 0-50Higher indicates activity
Higher night radiance generally tracks electrification and economic intensity.
Final: 45.36 / 100

🏞️ Water Bodies: Water Bodies Score Formula

Formula: Score = (Permanent Water Score * 70%) + (Seasonal Water Score * 30%)
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Permanent water53.91%70%Scaled against 10% benchmark
Seasonal water83.91%30%Scaled against 20% benchmark
Permanent water has higher score weight than seasonal water.
Final: 100.00 / 100

👥 Population Density: Population Density Formula

Formula: Score = ((20000 - density_per_km²) / 20000) * 100, clipped to [0,100]
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Density6,716.9 /km²Inverse scaleLower density -> higher score
This follows the Livability PopulationDensity model.
Final: 66.42 / 100

🚶 Walkability & Safety: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

View full livability report for Mangla →

Compliance Status

RERA registration, filings, and compliance flags based on public CG-RERA records.

Compliance Status Based on public CG-RERA records
3 Passed
1 Issue(s)
2 N/A
RERA Registration Active
Reg No. PCGRERA280818000723 — Status: Ongoing
Section 3 · Source · RERA Official Page
No RERA Orders
No complaints or orders found against this project
Sec 38–63 · Source
No Orders in Last 12 Months
Clean record — no complaints or orders filed
Source
Completion Overdue
Was due 30 Jun 2019 — overdue by ~90 month(s)
Section 4 · Source
Quarterly Updates Not Available
No compliance snapshot data on record
Section 11 · Source
Annual Audit Not Available
No compliance snapshot data on record
Section 4(2)(l)(D) · Source
Each check is based on publicly available CG-RERA portal data as of Nov 2026. How this works →

Details

Registration, professional team, bank, promoters, and compliance history.

Registration Details
RERA Number
PCGRERA280818000723
Status
Ongoing
Project Type
Mixed Development
Approved Date
28 Aug 2018
Original End Date
30 Jun 2019
EWS Category
NO
Construction Cost
₹ 17500000
Land Cost
₹ 3900000
Proposed Completion
30 Jun 2019
Authorised Person
RAMESH AGRAWAL
View on Map
Professional Team
RoleNameLicense / Membership
Statutory CA KUSHAL AGRAWAL 432109
Promoters
R
RAMESH AGRAWAL Individual

Buildings & Units

Inventory overview, sold/unsold breakdown, and building details.

Quarterly Plot Updates
PeriodTotalSold (prev)Sold (qtr)RemainingMortgage
2019-04-01 – 2019-06-30 0 0 0 0 0
2019-01-01 – 2019-03-31 0 0 0 0 0
2018-10-01 – 2018-12-31 0 0 0 0 0
2018-08-28 – 2018-09-30 0 0 0 0 0
Quarterly Building Updates
PeriodTotalSold (prev)Sold (qtr)RemainingMortgage
2019-04-01 – 2019-06-30 0 0 0 0 0
2019-01-01 – 2019-03-31 0 0 0 0 0
2018-10-01 – 2018-12-31 0 0 0 0 0
2018-08-28 – 2018-09-30 0 0 0 0 0
Quarterly Apartment Updates
PeriodTotalSold (prev)Sold (qtr)RemainingMortgage
2019-04-01 – 2019-06-30 14 0 0 14 0
2019-01-01 – 2019-03-31 14 0 0 14 3
2018-10-01 – 2018-12-31 14 0 0 14 3
2018-08-28 – 2018-09-30 14 0 0 14 3

Legal Orders & Cases

RERA legal orders, complaints, and case statistics filed against this project.

Legal Orders (0)
ComplaintApplicantSectionDateSourcePDF
No orders found for this project.

Location

Project address, coordinates, and nearby places.

Location Details
Address
GURU AMERI RAOD, MAHARAN PRATAP NAGAR, TIFRA BILASPUR
District
Bilaspur
Tehsil
Bilaspur
Coordinates
22.0881073, 82.1228777 View on Map
Stored 3km Amenities (Latest Refresh)
Amenity Count Coverage
3km Nearby Commercial 20 100%
3km Nearby Connectivity 1 8%
3km Nearby Hospitals 20 100%
3km Nearby Parks 20 100%
3km Nearby Restaurants 20 100%
3km Nearby Schools 20 100%
Area Livability

Livability of Mangla Bilaspur

Environmental, infrastructure & amenity parameters for the area where this project is located (0.65 km from project). Each value is compared with the Bilaspur average.

Composite Livability Score
71.3 / 100
Grade B · Good
+1.7 vs Bilaspur avg (69.6)
Air Quality
79.2 Good
Area
79
City
80
-1.0 vs city avg
Water Quality
65.0 Good
Area
65
City
71
-6.2 vs city avg
Sanitation
47.7 Below Avg
Area
48
City
59
-11.4 vs city avg
Green Cover
46.5 Below Avg
Area
47
City
50
-3.1 vs city avg
Noise Level
0.0 Poor
Area
0
City
55
-55.0 vs city avg
Infrastructure
74.3 Good
Area
74
City
68
+6.6 vs city avg
Amenities
81.8 Excellent
Area
82
City
59
+22.8 vs city avg
Flood Safety
72.5 Good
Area
73
City
70
+2.4 vs city avg
Earthquake Safety
90.0 Excellent
Area
90
City
90
+0.0 vs city avg
Land Surface Temp.
58.4 Average
Area
58
City
59
-0.1 vs city avg
Built-up Density
40.7 Below Avg
Area
41
City
55
-14.5 vs city avg
Night-light Activity
45.4 Below Avg
Area
45
City
42
+3.8 vs city avg
Water Bodies Nearby
100.0 Excellent
Area
100
City
67
+32.8 vs city avg
Population Density
66.4 Good
Area
66
City
73
-6.1 vs city avg
Groundwater Status
60.8 Average
Area
61
City
62
-0.7 vs city avg
View detailed livability report for Mangla
Neighborhood Intelligence

Explore nearby infrastructure around this project. Toggle categories to show/hide on the map.

Neighborhood Map 3 km radius
RERA Projects Near PRATYAKSHA HOMES 30 found within 3 km
# Project District Status Distance
1 WHITE ORCHIDS Bilaspur New 0.34 km
2 REALITY INFRASTRUCTURE Bilaspur Ongoing 0.37 km
3 Shivam Enclave Bilaspur New 0.44 km
4 SHALOM HIGH-TECH TOWERS Bilaspur Ongoing 0.55 km
5 SAGAR GOLDEN SQUARE Bilaspur New 0.64 km
6 AAMANORA VILLA Bilaspur Ongoing 0.83 km
7 NEEL SAGAR Bilaspur New 0.86 km
8 j.p. heights Bilaspur Ongoing 0.86 km
9 shri shyam parisar Bilaspur New 1.17 km
10 Maosaji courtyard Bilaspur New 1.21 km
11 LOVINA COURTS Bilaspur Ongoing 1.23 km
12 DSS COMPLEX Bilaspur Ongoing 1.24 km
13 PARIJAT KINGDOM Bilaspur Ongoing 1.24 km
14 green apartment Bilaspur Ongoing 1.25 km
15 aashiyana Bilaspur New 1.26 km
16 PICCADILLY PARK Bilaspur New 1.30 km
17 sai city Bilaspur Ongoing 1.36 km
18 GAWLANI PRIDE Bilaspur New 1.47 km
19 SANMATI VIHAR Bilaspur Ongoing 1.56 km
20 joy residency phase 2 Bilaspur New 1.67 km
21 arihant heights Bilaspur Ongoing 1.71 km
22 GAJMOHANI PARISAR Bilaspur Ongoing 1.87 km
23 ASTORIA Bilaspur New 1.92 km
24 rama life city phase -V Bilaspur New 2.01 km
25 NORTH AVENUE CHAMBER Bilaspur Ongoing 2.12 km
26 GIRDHAR VIHAR Bilaspur Ongoing 2.25 km
27 BILASPUR SAHAKARI GRIH NIRMAN SAMITI Bilaspur New 2.26 km
28 GIRDHAR VIHAR EXTENSION Bilaspur New 2.27 km
29 VIRASAT PARISAR Bilaspur New 2.35 km
30 Nirvana Homes Bilaspur New 2.64 km

Buyer Checklist

Documents and verifications a buyer should review before purchase.

Buyer Document Verification Checklist

Key documents a buyer should verify before purchasing in this project. Items marked Available have data on Seemankan.

11/14 verified
  • RERA Registration Certificate Available
    Confirms the project is registered with RERA CG. Verify registration number, validity dates, and project details on the RERA portal.
    RERA No: PCGRERA280818000723
    View on RERA Portal
  • Promoter Registration Certificate Available
    Builder / colonizer company registration certificate. Confirms the promoter entity is a registered firm, company, or society.
    Preview
  • Approved Building / Sanction Plan Available
    Building plan sanctioned by the local authority. Verify floor count, setbacks, and FSI compliance.
    Preview
  • Layout Plan Available
    Approved layout showing plot divisions, roads, open spaces, and common areas.
    Preview
  • Title Deed / Ownership Proof Available
    Proof that the promoter legally owns the land. Verify via Sub-Registrar records.
    Preview
  • Encumbrance Certificate Available
    Confirms the property is free from legal dues, mortgages, or liens. Obtain from Sub-Registrar office.
    Preview
  • Land Use / Diversion Certificate Verify Independently
    Required if land was converted from agricultural to non-agricultural use.
  • Architect Certificate Available
    Certification from a registered architect confirming structural plans and compliance.
    View View View +2 more
  • Structural Engineer Certificate Available
    Certification from a structural engineer confirming building safety and load-bearing capacity.
    View View View +2 more
  • CA Financial Certificate Available
    Chartered Accountant certificate on financial status, project cost estimates, and fund utilization.
    Preview View View +3 more
  • Commencement Certificate Available
    Permission to begin construction issued by the local authority after plan approval.
    Download Download Download +1 more
  • NOCs (No Objection Certificates) Verify Independently
    NOCs from fire department, environment, water supply, electricity board, and other authorities.
  • Project Brochure / Specification Available
    Official brochure with unit types, amenities, and specifications. Compare with actual delivery.
    Preview Preview
  • RERA Compliance Orders Verify Independently
    Check if any orders, penalties, or directions have been issued against this project by RERA.
Disclaimer: This checklist is for informational purposes only. "Available" means Seemankan has a copy from the RERA portal — it does not constitute legal verification. Always verify original documents with the concerned authorities and consult a legal advisor before making a purchase decision.

Risk Zone Within 5 km

Buffer zones (water bodies, airport restrictions) and risk sites (landfills, waste processing) detected within 3 km (immediate) and 5 km (extended) of the project.

0
Risk zones (within 5 km)
3 km: 0 3–5 km: 0
0
Water bodies (river/nala/lake)
3 km: 0 3–5 km: 0
0
Landfill / waste sites
3 km: 0 3–5 km: 0
0
Airport buffer overlap
3 km: 0 3–5 km: 0
Risk Zone Map (3 km & 5 km rings) Project marker centered
All Clear

No mapped risk zones within 3 km of this project.

Documents

RERA-filed documents and disclosures available for this project.

RERA Documents (97)
APARTMENTPHOTO (30)
View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View
ARCH (5)
View View View View View
AminitiesPHOTO (30)
View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View
BRIEF (1)
Preview
BUILDING (1)
Preview
CA (6)
Preview View View View View View
COM (4)
Download Download Download Download
DEVE (1)
Preview
ENGG (5)
View View View View View
ENUM (1)
Preview
FEESHEET (1)
Preview
LAYOUT (1)
Preview
PASSBOOK (1)
Preview
PHOTO (1)
Download
PSPEC (1)
Preview
Reg (1)
Preview
SEARCH (1)
Preview
SELF (1)
Preview
TAC (1)
Preview
other (4)
Preview Preview Preview Preview

Reviews

Verified buyer reviews and ratings for this project.

No reviews yet. Be the first to review this project!

Login to Write a Review

You need to be signed in to submit a review for this project.

Login or Register

Log in to see the full page

This page shows a preview. Sign in (or create a free account) to unlock the full content, charts, and downloads.

Log in Create account