You're viewing a preview. Log in or create a free account to see the full page.
RealEstateIQTM
IN हिन्दी
Want a full project intelligence report? Download a detailed PDF report — RERA compliance, promoter, financials, amenities, location & risk.
Generate Project Report
Home / RERA Projects / CONSTRUCTION OF 18 MIG, 133 MIG, 63 EWS HOUSES & 14 COMMERCIAL SHOP AT SELUD PATAN ,DIST - DURG
NEW Residential Development RERA Page Project Website

CONSTRUCTION OF 18 MIG, 133 MIG, 63 EWS HOUSES & 14 COMMERCIAL SHOP AT SELUD PATAN ,DIST - DURG

Compliance Status
Compliant
21.0953, 81.4332 Explore area
District
Durg
Area
—
Promoter
CHHATTISGARH HOUSING BOARD DIVISION-DURG
Project Information
Promoter CHHATTISGARH HOUSING BOARD DIVISION-DURG
Type Residential Development
Status New
Completion 20 Feb 2028
Registered 29 Dec 2022
Original End 20 Oct 2027
Total Units 228 · 110 sold
EWS Category NO
Construction Cost ₹ 321078000
Land Cost ₹ 436000
Authorised Person EXECUTIVE ENGINEER CG HOUSING BOARD DIVISION DURG
Address RAJIV NAGAR AWAS YOJNA SELUD PATAN DIST DURG
At a Glance
228
Total Units
110
Units Sold
118
Unsold
0
Legal Cases
Feb 2028
Target Completion
6%
Completion
Amenities & Facilities (15)
3km Nearby Commercial (2)
10%
3km Nearby Connectivity (0)
0%
3km Nearby Hospitals (17)
100%
3km Nearby Parks (2)
20%
3km Nearby Restaurants (7)
35%
3km Nearby Schools (6)
30%
BOUNDARY WALL
0%
INTERNAL ROADS AND FOOTPATHS
20%
LANDSCAPING AND TREE PLANTING
0%
OPEN PARKING
0%
SEWERAGE
20%
STORM WATER DRAINS
0%
STREET LIGHTING
13%
WATER CONSERVATION RAIN WATER HARVESTING
0%
WATER SUPPLY
0%
Project Professionals
MANOJ KUMAR SAIN
STATUTORY CA
VINOD KUMAR KHATRI
QUARTERLY CA
VK.GAHARWAR
ENGINEER
C.L.DOLE
ARCHITECT
Project Analysis

360° Project Intelligence

Comprehensive analysis across regulatory, livability, market, filing activity, and market readiness dimensions.

Area Livability

Livability of Sector 8

Eighteen environmental, infrastructure and amenity parameters for the nearest mapped area (Sector 8 — 11.66 km from this project). Click any parameter for the underlying readings, thresholds and what they mean.



🏠 Livability Parameters

Latest readings for Sector 8. Only parameters with available data are shown below. Based on the latest readings for Sector 8.

B
Composite Score
69.5 /100
Good

🌬️ Air Quality

Final Score: 90.0/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Air Quality?AQI summarizes PM2.5, PM10 and gases. Lower pollution values improve public health outcomes.
AQI
75
Satisfactory
PM2.5
22.1 µg/m³
≤ 40
PM10
54.1 µg/m³
≤ 60
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
PM2.5 22.1 µg/m³ ≤ 40
Good
PM10 54.1 µg/m³ ≤ 60
Good
NO₂ 15.5 µg/m³ ≤ 40
Good
💡 What does this mean for you?Cleaner air lowers respiratory burden and improves outdoor comfort.

💧 Water Quality

Final Score: 75.0/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Water Quality?Water quality combines chemistry, supply duration and contamination markers.
TDS
300 ppm
≤ 500
pH
7.30
6.5–8.5
Supply
8.0 hr/day
≥ 8 hr
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
TDS 300 ppm ≤ 500
Good
Fluoride 0.60 mg/L ≤ 1.0
Good
Turbidity 3.0 NTU ≤ 1
Concern
💡 What does this mean for you?Better supply quality and consistency reduces dependence on tanker/groundwater fallback.

🧹 Sanitation

Final Score: 76.7/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Sanitation?Sanitation reflects ODF status, sewage treatment and waste management regularity.
ODF
ODF++
ODF++
Sewage Coverage
70%
≥ 80%
Drainage
72%
≥ 90%
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
ODF Status ODF++ ODF++
Info
Sewage Coverage 70% ≥ 80%
Concern
Drainage Coverage 72% ≥ 90%
Concern
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher sanitation maturity lowers disease exposure and neighborhood nuisance.

🛣️ Infrastructure

Final Score: 79.6/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Infrastructure?Infrastructure score combines land use, urbanization, built form, night lights and terrain indicators.
Built-up
47.4%
Balanced band
Tree Cover
35.8%
≥ 15%
Urbanization
98.1
Higher better
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Built-up (LULC) 47.4% 40-70%
Contextual
Impervious Surface 21.4% < 70%
Good
NDVI Mean 0.210 > 0.3
Concern
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Built-up (LULC) % 47.7% 47.1% 47.4%
Tree Cover % 40.5% 31.0% 35.8%
Urbanization Index 100.0 96.2 98.1
Infra Score 80.7 78.4 80.3
💡 What does this mean for you?Balanced built + green mix usually improves long-term livability resilience.

🏥 Amenities

Final Score: 16.9/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Amenities?Amenity score captures daily-access services in walk/short-drive radii.
Hospitals 500m
0
Target ≥1
Schools 1km
0
Target ≥3
Parks 500m
0
Target ≥1
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Hospitals (500m) 0 ≥1
Concern
Schools (1km) 0 ≥3
Concern
Markets (1km) 0 ≥1
Concern
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher local amenity density improves convenience and walkability.

🌳 Green Cover

Final Score: 21.4/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Green Cover?NDVI and vegetation structure are measured from satellite imagery to estimate neighborhood greenery.
NDVI Mean
0.138
Greenness index
Vegetation
31.0%
% green pixels
Dense Green
0.9%
Thick canopy
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
NDVI Mean 0.138 0.5 maps to score 100
Weighted 40%
Vegetation % 31.0% Direct % (cap 100)
Weighted 30%
Dense Green % 0.9% Scaled from 50%
Weighted 20%
Parks within 500m 0 Count * 33 (cap 100)
Weighted 10%
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
NDVI Mean 0.143 0.132 0.138
Vegetation % 27.7% 34.4% 31.0%
Dense Green % 0.4% 1.3% 0.9%
Tree Canopy % 0.3% 0.9% 0.6%
Green Score 19.9 21.4 20.7
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher green metrics typically reduce heat stress and improve comfort.

🔊 Noise

Final Score: 88.5/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Noise?Noise uses measured day/night dB compared to CPCB zone limits.
Day dB
47.1
vs CPCB day limit
Night dB
39.3
vs CPCB night limit
Zone
residential
CPCB class
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Day Noise 47.1 dB ≤ 55.0 dB
Good
Night Noise 39.3 dB ≤ 45.0 dB
Good
Nearest Highway — m Higher usually quieter
Info
💡 What does this mean for you?Chronic high noise impacts stress, sleep quality and perceived comfort.

🌊 Flood Risk

Final Score: 80.0/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Flood Risk?Flood risk combines river exposure and local waterlogging vulnerability.
Overall Risk
Low
Lower is safer
River Risk
Low
Lower is safer
Waterlogging
Low
Lower is safer
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Overall Risk Low Low preferred
Info
River Flood Risk Low Low preferred
Info
Waterlogging Risk Low Low preferred
Info
💡 What does this mean for you?Lower flood risk means less disruption and lower hazard exposure.

🏚️ Earthquake Risk

Final Score: 90.0/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Earthquake Risk?Earthquake profile uses seismic zone, PGA and soil/liquefaction risk factors.
Seismic Zone
Zone II
Lower risk zone preferred
Risk Level
Low
Low preferred
Liquefaction
None
Low preferred
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Seismic Zone Zone II II preferred
Info
Risk Level Low Low preferred
Info
PGA (475yr) 0.0155g Lower preferred
Info
💡 What does this mean for you?Lower seismic hazard reduces structural and insurance risk exposure.

🌡️ Land Surface Temp

Final Score: 63.1/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Land Surface Temp?Land Surface Temperature reflects heat-island intensity from satellite thermal bands.
LST Mean
29.2°C
Lower better
LST Min
14.6°C
Context
LST Max
39.2°C
Lower better
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
LST Mean 29.2°C 20°C best / 45°C worst
Weighted by formula
LST Score 63.1 0-100
Computed
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
LST Mean (°C) 29.0 29.4 29.2
LST Min (°C) 14.2 14.9 14.6
LST Max (°C) 39.5 38.9 39.2
LST Score 63.9 62.3 63.1
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher heat exposure affects comfort, cooling load and health risk.

🏗️ Built-up Density

Final Score: 52.6/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Built-up Density?Built-up density measures extent of developed surface versus open space.
Built-up %
47.4%
Lower better
Open Space %
52.6%
Higher better
Built-up Score
52.6
0-100
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Built-up % 47.4% Inverse scoring
Score = 100 - builtup%
Open Space % 52.6% Context
Info
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Built-up % 47.7% 47.1% 47.4%
Open Space % 52.4% 52.9% 52.6%
Built-up Score 52.4 52.9 52.6
💡 What does this mean for you?Very high built-up often raises heat and runoff while reducing open environmental buffers.

💡 Night-time Lights

Final Score: 50.7/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Night-time Lights?Nighttime lights are a proxy for economic activity and electrification intensity.
Avg Radiance
25.35
Higher better
Max Radiance
43.08
Context
NTL Score
50.7
0-100
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Avg Radiance 25.35 Scaled to 50
Score = min(100, avg/50*100)
NTL Score 50.7 0-100
Computed
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Avg Radiance 26.13 24.56 25.35
Max Radiance 43.23 42.92 43.08
NTL Score 52.3 49.1 50.7
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher radiance often indicates stronger urban activity but can correlate with light pollution.

🏞️ Water Bodies

Final Score: 100.0/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Water Bodies?Water-bodies score reflects permanent and seasonal water presence in the analysis radius.
Permanent Water
95.84%
Higher generally better
Seasonal Water
99.68%
Context
Water Score
100.0
0-100
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Permanent Water % 95.84% 70% weight
Scaled against 10%
Seasonal Water % 99.68% 30% weight
Scaled against 20%
Water Score 100.0 0-100
Computed
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Permanent Water % 94.33% 97.34% 95.84%
Seasonal Water % 99.68% 99.68% 99.68%
Water Score 100.0 100.0 100.0
💡 What does this mean for you?Water presence can support cooling, recharge and ecological quality.

👥 Population Density

Final Score: 79.1/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Population Density?Population density indicates urban crowding pressure around the area.
Population
70,299
Estimated residents
Density/km²
4,187.3
Lower better for this score
Score
79.1
0-100
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Density/km² 4,187.3 Inverse scale up to 20,000
Lower -> higher score
Score 79.1 0-100
Computed
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Population Total 12,024 128,573 70,299
Density / km² 3,827.3 4,547.3 4,187.3
Pop Density Score 80.9 77.3 79.1
💡 What does this mean for you?Extremely high density can increase pressure on services and mobility.

🚶 Walkability & Safety

↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Walkability & Safety?OSM amenity metrics reflect pedestrian, safety and urban accessibility infrastructure.
Footpaths
0
Higher better
Street Lamps
0
Higher better
Police/Fire Access
0
Presence
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Footpaths (500m) 0 ≥ 3
Concern
Sidewalk Roads (1km) 0 ≥ 5
Concern
Nearest Police Station — m ≤ 2000m
Context
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher OSM accessibility/safety features generally improve everyday livability.

🌬️ Air Quality: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

💧 Water Quality: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🧹 Sanitation: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🛣️ Infrastructure: Infrastructure Score Formula

Formula: Composite weighted model from GHSL/ESA/VIIRS/Terrain features
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Urbanization index98.0920%SMOD
Built-up balance47.4%15%Best in moderate band
NTL stability60.0%15%Power/activity consistency
Avg building height9.49 m10%Vertical infra proxy
Impervious %21.4%10%Moderate is optimal
Radiance25.4810%Development proxy
Slope0.10°10%Flatter is better
Green support35.8%10%Tree + grass contribution
This is the same weighted structure used in Livability Infrastructure model.
Final: 80.34 / 100

🏥 Amenities: Amenity Score Breakdown

Formula: Each amenity category is capped at 100, final score is averaged across categories
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Hospitals 500m0 * 33Cap 100Health access
Schools 1km0 * 20Cap 100Education access
Markets 1km0 * 33Cap 100Daily needs
Parks 500m0 * 33Cap 100Open space
Transit 1km0 * 50Cap 100Mobility
Category multipliers mirror the Livability snapshot logic.
Final: Final from amenity_scores table

🌳 Green Cover: Green Score Formula

Formula: Score = (NDVI*40%) + (Vegetation*30%) + (Dense Green*20%) + (Parks*10%)
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
NDVI component0.138 => 27.640%11.0
Vegetation component31.0% => 31.030%9.3
Dense green component0.9% => 1.720%0.3
Parks component0 => 0.010%0.0
This matches the Livability GreenCover model weighting logic.
Final: 20.69 / 100

🔊 Noise: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🌊 Flood Risk: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🏚️ Earthquake Risk: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🌡️ Land Surface Temp: LST Score Formula

Formula: Score = ((45 - LST Mean) / 25) * 100, clipped to [0,100]
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
LST Mean29.23 °CReference20°C best, 45°C worst
Lower land surface temperature means better livability.
Final: 63.08 / 100

🏗️ Built-up Density: Built-up Score Formula

Formula: Score = 100 - Built-up %
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Built-up %47.4%InverseLower is better
Dense concrete surfaces reduce infiltration and increase heat islands.
Final: 52.63 / 100

💡 Night-time Lights: Night-time Lights Formula

Formula: Score = min(100, (Avg Radiance / 50) * 100)
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Avg Radiance25.35Scale 0-50Higher indicates activity
Higher night radiance generally tracks electrification and economic intensity.
Final: 50.69 / 100

🏞️ Water Bodies: Water Bodies Score Formula

Formula: Score = (Permanent Water Score * 70%) + (Seasonal Water Score * 30%)
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Permanent water95.84%70%Scaled against 10% benchmark
Seasonal water99.68%30%Scaled against 20% benchmark
Permanent water has higher score weight than seasonal water.
Final: 100.00 / 100

👥 Population Density: Population Density Formula

Formula: Score = ((20000 - density_per_km²) / 20000) * 100, clipped to [0,100]
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Density4,187.3 /km²Inverse scaleLower density -> higher score
This follows the Livability PopulationDensity model.
Final: 79.06 / 100

🚶 Walkability & Safety: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

View full livability report for Sector 8 →

Compliance Status

RERA registration, filings, and compliance flags based on public CG-RERA records.

Compliance Status Based on public CG-RERA records
4 Passed
2 N/A
RERA Registration Active
Reg No. PCGRERA291222001576 — Status: New
No RERA Orders
No complaints or orders found against this project
Sec 38–63 · Source
No Orders in Last 12 Months
Clean record — no complaints or orders filed
Within Timeline
Target completion: 20 Feb 2028
Section 4 · Source
Quarterly Updates Not Available
No compliance snapshot data on record
Section 11 · Source
Annual Audit Not Available
No compliance snapshot data on record
Section 4(2)(l)(D) · Source
Each check is based on publicly available CG-RERA portal data as of Nov 2026. How this works →
Other Projects by Same Promoter (11)
ProjectRERA No.StatusDistrictType
atal vihar yojna parsada kumhari PCGRERA090818000671 Ongoing Durg Residential Development
atal vihar yojna sankara PCGRERA020319000930 New Durg Mixed Development
COMPOSITE HOUSING SCHEME CHARODA PCGRERA090818000684 Ongoing Durg Residential Development
COMPOSITE HOUSING SCHEME KHARUN GREENS KUMHARI PCGRERA200918000774 Ongoing Durg Residential Development
CONSTRUCTION OF 18 SRHIG, 41 HIG, 96 MIG, 196 LIG, 95 EWS HOUSES (446 HOUSES), 36 UTILITY SHOP, 14 K PCGRERA110923001670 New Durg Residential Development
CONSTRUCTION OF 44 JRMIG, 47 EWS HOUSES (PHASE II) AT BAGHERA DURG DIST. DURG PCGRERA271021001289 New Durg Residential Development
Construction of Commercial Shops and Residential House at Talpuri Block-B, Durg PCGRERA221125002002 New Durg Residential Development
contruction of 16 mig,69 lig a,86 lig b, 55 ews for rajiv nagar awas yojna at murmunda ,durg PCGRERA300322001376 New Durg Residential Development
SELF FINANCE SCHEME FOR CONSTRUCTION OF COMMERCIAL CUM RESIDENTIAL COMPLEX AT RUABANDHA TALPURI BLOC PCGRERA200125001872 New Durg Mixed Development
twincity talpuri PCGRERA300618000403 Ongoing Durg Residential Development
TWINCITY TALPURI, BLOCK-C PCGRERA120319000937 New Durg Mixed Development

Details

Registration, professional team, bank, promoters, and compliance history.

Registration Details
RERA Number
PCGRERA291222001576
Status
New
Project Type
Residential Development
Approved Date
29 Dec 2022
Original End Date
20 Oct 2027
EWS Category
NO
Construction Cost
₹ 321078000
Land Cost
₹ 436000
Proposed Completion
20 Feb 2028
Authorised Person
EXECUTIVE ENGINEER CG HOUSING BOARD DIVISION DURG
Website
www.cghb.gov.in
Professional Team
RoleNameLicense / Membership
Statutory CA Manoj Kumar Sain 431706
Quarterly CA VINOD KUMAR KHATRI 071797
Engineer VK.Gaharwar DYHC
Architect C.L.DOLE CA/89/12366
Promoters
C
CHHATTISGARH HOUSING BOARD division-DURG Government/Semi Government Agency

Buildings & Units

Inventory overview, sold/unsold breakdown, and building details.

Inventory Overview
228
Total Inventory
110
Sold (48%)
118
Unsold (52%)
0
Mortgage (0%)
48%
52%
Sold Unsold Mortgage
Quarterly Plot Updates
PeriodTotalSold (prev)Sold (qtr)RemainingMortgage
2026-04-01 – 2026-06-30 0 0 0 0 0
2026-01-01 – 2026-03-31 0 0 0 0 0
2025-10-01 – 2025-12-31 0 0 0 0 0
2025-07-01 – 2025-09-30 0 0 0 0 0
2025-04-01 – 2025-06-30 0 0 0 0 0
2025-01-01 – 2025-03-31 0 0 0 0 0
2024-10-01 – 2024-12-31 0 0 0 0 0
2024-07-01 – 2024-09-30 0 0 0 0 0
2024-04-01 – 2024-06-30 0 0 0 0 0
2024-01-01 – 2024-03-31 0 0 0 0 0
2023-10-01 – 2023-12-31 0 0 0 0 0
2023-07-01 – 2023-09-30 0 0 0 0 0
2023-04-01 – 2023-06-30 0 0 0 0 0
2023-01-01 – 2023-03-31 0 0 0 0 0
2022-12-29 – 2022-12-31 0 0 0 0 0
Quarterly Building Updates
PeriodTotalSold (prev)Sold (qtr)RemainingMortgage
2026-04-01 – 2026-06-30 228 98 12 118 0
2026-01-01 – 2026-03-31 228 67 31 130 0
2025-10-01 – 2025-12-31 228 67 0 161 0
2025-07-01 – 2025-09-30 228 55 13 161 0
2025-04-01 – 2025-06-30 228 39 16 173 0
2025-01-01 – 2025-03-31 228 28 11 189 0
2024-10-01 – 2024-12-31 228 19 9 200 0
2024-07-01 – 2024-09-30 228 14 5 209 0
2024-04-01 – 2024-06-30 228 0 14 214 0
2024-01-01 – 2024-03-31 231 0 0 231 0
2023-10-01 – 2023-12-31 214 0 0 214 0
2023-07-01 – 2023-09-30 214 0 0 214 0
2023-04-01 – 2023-06-30 214 11 0 214 0
2023-01-01 – 2023-03-31 214 0 11 203 0
2022-12-29 – 2022-12-31 214 0 0 214 0
Quarterly Apartment Updates
PeriodTotalSold (prev)Sold (qtr)RemainingMortgage
2026-04-01 – 2026-06-30 0 0 0 0 0
2026-01-01 – 2026-03-31 0 0 0 0 0
2025-10-01 – 2025-12-31 0 0 0 0 0
2025-07-01 – 2025-09-30 0 0 0 0 0
2025-04-01 – 2025-06-30 0 0 0 0 0
2025-01-01 – 2025-03-31 0 0 0 0 0
2024-10-01 – 2024-12-31 0 0 0 0 0
2024-07-01 – 2024-09-30 0 0 0 0 0
2024-04-01 – 2024-06-30 0 0 0 0 0
2024-01-01 – 2024-03-31 0 0 0 0 0
2023-10-01 – 2023-12-31 0 0 0 0 0
2023-07-01 – 2023-09-30 0 0 0 0 0
2023-04-01 – 2023-06-30 0 0 0 0 0
2023-01-01 – 2023-03-31 0 0 0 0 0
2022-12-29 – 2022-12-31 0 0 0 0 0

Location

Project address, coordinates, and nearby places.

Location Details
Address
RAJIV NAGAR AWAS YOJNA SELUD PATAN DIST DURG
District
Durg
Tehsil
Patan
Coordinates
21.0952843, 81.4331562 View on Map
Stored 3km Amenities (Latest Refresh)
Amenity Count Coverage
3km Nearby Commercial 2 10%
3km Nearby Connectivity 0 0%
3km Nearby Hospitals 17 100%
3km Nearby Parks 2 20%
3km Nearby Restaurants 7 35%
3km Nearby Schools 6 30%
Area Livability

Livability of Sector 8 Bhilai

Environmental, infrastructure & amenity parameters for the area where this project is located (11.66 km from project). Each value is compared with the Bhilai average.

Composite Livability Score
69.5 / 100
Grade B · Good
-5.6 vs Bhilai avg (75.1)
Air Quality
90.0 Excellent
Area
90
City
92
-1.8 vs city avg
Water Quality
75.0 Good
Area
75
City
74
+1.1 vs city avg
Sanitation
76.7 Good
Area
77
City
68
+8.9 vs city avg
Green Cover
21.4 Poor
Area
21
City
38
-17.0 vs city avg
Noise Level
88.5 Excellent
Area
88
City
89
-0.2 vs city avg
Infrastructure
79.6 Good
Area
80
City
73
+6.9 vs city avg
Amenities
16.9 Poor
Area
17
City
72
-55.4 vs city avg
Flood Safety
80.0 Excellent
Area
80
City
74
+6.2 vs city avg
Earthquake Safety
90.0 Excellent
Area
90
City
90
+0.0 vs city avg
Land Surface Temp.
63.1 Average
Area
63
City
60
+3.0 vs city avg
Built-up Density
52.6 Average
Area
53
City
43
+9.2 vs city avg
Night-light Activity
50.7 Average
Area
51
City
46
+5.2 vs city avg
Water Bodies Nearby
100.0 Excellent
Area
100
City
86
+14.5 vs city avg
Population Density
79.1 Good
Area
79
City
66
+12.8 vs city avg
Groundwater Status
58.6 Average
Area
59
City
59
-0.4 vs city avg
Neighborhood Intelligence

Explore nearby infrastructure around this project. Toggle categories to show/hide on the map.

Neighborhood Map 3 km radius

Buyer Checklist

Documents and verifications a buyer should review before purchase.

Buyer Document Verification Checklist

Key documents a buyer should verify before purchasing in this project. Items marked Available have data on Seemankan.

12/14 verified
  • RERA Registration Certificate Available
    Confirms the project is registered with RERA CG. Verify registration number, validity dates, and project details on the RERA portal.
    RERA No: PCGRERA291222001576
  • Promoter Registration Certificate Available
    Builder / colonizer company registration certificate. Confirms the promoter entity is a registered firm, company, or society.
  • Approved Building / Sanction Plan Available
    Building plan sanctioned by the local authority. Verify floor count, setbacks, and FSI compliance.
  • Layout Plan Available
    Approved layout showing plot divisions, roads, open spaces, and common areas.
  • Title Deed / Ownership Proof Available
    Proof that the promoter legally owns the land. Verify via Sub-Registrar records.
  • Encumbrance Certificate Available
    Confirms the property is free from legal dues, mortgages, or liens. Obtain from Sub-Registrar office.
  • Land Use / Diversion Certificate Available
    Required if land was converted from agricultural to non-agricultural use.
  • Architect Certificate Available
    Certification from a registered architect confirming structural plans and compliance.
  • Structural Engineer Certificate Available
    Certification from a structural engineer confirming building safety and load-bearing capacity.
  • CA Financial Certificate Available
    Chartered Accountant certificate on financial status, project cost estimates, and fund utilization.
  • Commencement Certificate Verify Independently
    Permission to begin construction issued by the local authority after plan approval.
  • NOCs (No Objection Certificates) Available
    NOCs from fire department, environment, water supply, electricity board, and other authorities.
  • Project Brochure / Specification Available
    Official brochure with unit types, amenities, and specifications. Compare with actual delivery.
  • RERA Compliance Orders Verify Independently
    Check if any orders, penalties, or directions have been issued against this project by RERA.

Risk Zone Within 5 km

Buffer zones (water bodies, airport restrictions) and risk sites (landfills, waste processing) detected within 3 km (immediate) and 5 km (extended) of the project.

0
Risk zones (within 5 km)
3 km: 0 3–5 km: 0
0
Water bodies (river/nala/lake)
3 km: 0 3–5 km: 0
0
Landfill / waste sites
3 km: 0 3–5 km: 0
0
Airport buffer overlap
3 km: 0 3–5 km: 0
Risk Zone Map (3 km & 5 km rings) Project marker centered
All Clear

No mapped risk zones within 3 km of this project.

Documents

RERA-filed documents and disclosures available for this project.

Reviews

Verified buyer reviews and ratings for this project.

No reviews yet. Be the first to review this project!

Login to Write a Review

You need to be signed in to submit a review for this project.

Login or Register

Log in to see the full page

This page shows a preview. Sign in (or create a free account) to unlock the full content, charts, and downloads.

Log in Create account