NEW Residential Development RERA Page Project Website

GENERATE REPORT

AVINASH THE LAGOON

21.1526, 81.7600 Explore area

District

Raipur

Area

—

Promoter

AVINASH DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED

Project Information

Promoter AVINASH DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED

Type Residential Development

Status New

Completion 02 Oct 2027

RERA No. PCGRERA141022001540

Registered 14 Oct 2022

Original End 02 Oct 2027

Total Units 68 · 36 sold

EWS Category NO

Construction Cost ₹ 695450000

Land Cost ₹ 436124000

Authorised Person anand singhania

Website www.avinashgroup.com/project/detail/the-lagoon

Address VILLAGE - TUTA, SECTOR-24 POCKET A1, NAVA RAIPUR, ATAL NAGAR, DISTRICT RAIPUR (C.G.)

At a Glance

Total Units

Units Sold

Unsold

Legal Cases

Oct 2027

Target Completion

62%

Completion

Amenities & Facilities (15)

BOUNDARY WALL

100%

CLUB HOUSE

85%

COMMUNITY BUILDINGS

80%

ENERGY MAANAGEMENT

100%

GYM

70%

INTERNAL ROADS AND FOOTPATHS

80%

LANDSCAPING AND TREE PLANTING

100%

OPEN PARKING

75%

SECURITY SERVICE

100%

SEWERAGE

100%

STORM WATER DRAINS

100%

STREET LIGHTING

100%

SWIMMING POOL

90%

WATER CONSERVATION RAIN WATER HARVESTING

100%

WATER SUPPLY

100%

Project Professionals

TAPAN KUMAR SHARMA

STATUTORY CA

DINESH DEWANGAN

QUARTERLY CA

VISHEK BISEN

ENGINEER

AKHILESH GUPTA

ARCHITECT

Project Analysis

360° Project Intelligence

Comprehensive analysis across regulatory, livability, market, filing activity, and market readiness dimensions.

Regulatory

12 of 14 checks · Strong Signals

Livability

Sector 23 · Moderate Signals

Legal

No legal orders on record · 4 nearby

Filing Activity

250

211 docs · 39 quarterly updates

Market Readiness

New · due Oct 2027

Area Livability

Livability of Sector 23

Eighteen environmental, infrastructure and amenity parameters for the nearest mapped area (Sector 23 — 1.18 km from this project). Click any parameter for the underlying readings, thresholds and what they mean.

🏠 Livability Parameters

Latest readings for Sector 23. Only parameters with available data are shown below. Based on the latest readings for Sector 23.

Composite Score

54.0 /100

Average

🌬️ Air Quality

Final Score: 99.6/100 ↑ Higher is Better

ℹ️ What is Air Quality?AQI summarizes PM2.5, PM10 and gases. Lower pollution values improve public health outcomes.

AQI

Satisfactory

PM2.5

30.8 µg/m³

≤ 40

PM10

58.7 µg/m³

≤ 60

Scoring Breakdown

Parameter	Value	Target / Rule	Status
PM2.5	30.8 µg/m³	≤ 40	Good
PM10	58.7 µg/m³	≤ 60	Good
NO₂	8.8 µg/m³	≤ 40	Good

💡 What does this mean for you?Cleaner air lowers respiratory burden and improves outdoor comfort.

💧 Water Quality

Final Score: 86.2/100 ↑ Higher is Better

ℹ️ What is Water Quality?Water quality combines chemistry, supply duration and contamination markers.

TDS

218 ppm

≤ 500

7.95

6.5–8.5

Supply

10.7 hr/day

≥ 8 hr

Scoring Breakdown

Parameter	Value	Target / Rule	Status
TDS	218 ppm	≤ 500	Good
Fluoride	0.70 mg/L	≤ 1.0	Good
Turbidity	1.2 NTU	≤ 1	Concern

💡 What does this mean for you?Better supply quality and consistency reduces dependence on tanker/groundwater fallback.

🧹 Sanitation

Final Score: 76.5/100 ↑ Higher is Better

ℹ️ What is Sanitation?Sanitation reflects ODF status, sewage treatment and waste management regularity.

ODF

ODF+

ODF++

Sewage Coverage

70%

≥ 80%

Drainage

78%

≥ 90%

Scoring Breakdown

Parameter	Value	Target / Rule	Status
ODF Status	ODF+	ODF++	Info
Sewage Coverage	70%	≥ 80%	Concern
Drainage Coverage	78%	≥ 90%	Concern

💡 What does this mean for you?Higher sanitation maturity lowers disease exposure and neighborhood nuisance.

🛣️ Infrastructure

Final Score: 35.1/100 ↑ Higher is Better

ℹ️ What is Infrastructure?Infrastructure score combines land use, urbanization, built form, night lights and terrain indicators.

Built-up

8.3%

Balanced band

Tree Cover

4.7%

≥ 15%

Urbanization

27.1

Higher better

Scoring Breakdown

Parameter	Value	Target / Rule	Status
Built-up (LULC)	8.3%	40-70%	Contextual
Impervious Surface	21.4%	< 70%	Good
NDVI Mean	0.280	> 0.3	Concern

Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison

Parameter	1000m	3000m	Average (Final)
Built-up (LULC) %	10.8%	5.8%	8.3%
Tree Cover %	3.6%	5.9%	4.7%
Urbanization Index	35.8	18.4	27.1
Infra Score	39.5	30.7	35.1

💡 What does this mean for you?Balanced built + green mix usually improves long-term livability resilience.

🏥 Amenities

Final Score: 42.7/100 ↑ Higher is Better

ℹ️ What is Amenities?Amenity score captures daily-access services in walk/short-drive radii.

Hospitals 500m

Target ≥1

Schools 1km

Target ≥3

Parks 500m

Target ≥1

Scoring Breakdown

Parameter	Value	Target / Rule	Status
Hospitals (500m)	0	≥1	Concern
Schools (1km)	3	≥3	Good
Markets (1km)	1	≥1	Good

💡 What does this mean for you?Higher local amenity density improves convenience and walkability.

🌳 Green Cover

Final Score: 45.4/100 ↑ Higher is Better

ℹ️ What is Green Cover?NDVI and vegetation structure are measured from satellite imagery to estimate neighborhood greenery.

NDVI Mean

0.319

Greenness index

Vegetation

40.5%

% green pixels

Dense Green

22.8%

Thick canopy

Scoring Breakdown

Parameter	Value	Target / Rule	Status
NDVI Mean	0.319	0.5 maps to score 100	Weighted 40%
Vegetation %	40.5%	Direct % (cap 100)	Weighted 30%
Dense Green %	22.8%	Scaled from 50%	Weighted 20%
Parks within 500m	1	Count * 33 (cap 100)	Weighted 10%

Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison

Parameter	1000m	3000m	Average (Final)
NDVI Mean	0.356	0.282	0.319
Vegetation %	49.2%	31.8%	40.5%
Dense Green %	20.8%	24.9%	22.8%
Tree Canopy %	27.5%	24.6%	26.0%
Green Score	54.9	45.4	50.1

💡 What does this mean for you?Higher green metrics typically reduce heat stress and improve comfort.

🔊 Noise

Final Score: 82.7/100 ↑ Higher is Better

ℹ️ What is Noise?Noise uses measured day/night dB compared to CPCB zone limits.

Day dB

60.1

vs CPCB day limit

Night dB

55.1

vs CPCB night limit

Zone

commercial

CPCB class

Scoring Breakdown

Parameter	Value	Target / Rule	Status
Day Noise	60.1 dB	≤ 65.0 dB	Good
Night Noise	55.1 dB	≤ 55.0 dB	Concern
Nearest Highway	1,586 m	Higher usually quieter	Info

💡 What does this mean for you?Chronic high noise impacts stress, sleep quality and perceived comfort.

🌊 Flood Risk

Final Score: 10.0/100 ↑ Higher is Better

ℹ️ What is Flood Risk?Flood risk combines river exposure and local waterlogging vulnerability.

Overall Risk

Lowest

Lower is safer

River Risk

Low

Lower is safer

Waterlogging

Low

Lower is safer

Scoring Breakdown

Parameter	Value	Target / Rule	Status
Overall Risk	Lowest	Low preferred	Info
River Flood Risk	Low	Low preferred	Info
Waterlogging Risk	Low	Low preferred	Info

💡 What does this mean for you?Lower flood risk means less disruption and lower hazard exposure.

🏚️ Earthquake Risk

Final Score: 10.0/100 ↑ Higher is Better

ℹ️ What is Earthquake Risk?Earthquake profile uses seismic zone, PGA and soil/liquefaction risk factors.

Seismic Zone

Zone II

Lower risk zone preferred

Risk Level

Low

Low preferred

Liquefaction

None

Low preferred

Scoring Breakdown

Parameter	Value	Target / Rule	Status
Seismic Zone	Zone II	II preferred	Info
Risk Level	Low	Low preferred	Info
PGA (475yr)	0.0155g	Lower preferred	Info

💡 What does this mean for you?Lower seismic hazard reduces structural and insurance risk exposure.

🌡️ Land Surface Temp

Final Score: 60.4/100 ↑ Higher is Better

ℹ️ What is Land Surface Temp?Land Surface Temperature reflects heat-island intensity from satellite thermal bands.

LST Mean

29.9°C

Lower better

LST Min

0.8°C

Context

LST Max

40.5°C

Lower better

Scoring Breakdown

Parameter	Value	Target / Rule	Status
LST Mean	29.9°C	20°C best / 45°C worst	Weighted by formula
LST Score	60.4	0-100	Computed

Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison

Parameter	1000m	3000m	Average (Final)
LST Mean (°C)	30.2	29.6	29.9
LST Min (°C)	-0.4	2.0	0.8
LST Max (°C)	40.7	40.2	40.5
LST Score	59.1	61.7	60.4

💡 What does this mean for you?Higher heat exposure affects comfort, cooling load and health risk.

🏗️ Built-up Density

Final Score: 91.7/100 ↑ Higher is Better

ℹ️ What is Built-up Density?Built-up density measures extent of developed surface versus open space.

Built-up %

8.3%

Lower better

Open Space %

91.7%

Higher better

Built-up Score

91.7

0-100

Scoring Breakdown

Parameter	Value	Target / Rule	Status
Built-up %	8.3%	Inverse scoring	Score = 100 - builtup%
Open Space %	91.7%	Context	Info

Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison

Parameter	1000m	3000m	Average (Final)
Built-up %	10.8%	5.8%	8.3%
Open Space %	89.2%	94.2%	91.7%
Built-up Score	89.2	94.2	91.7

💡 What does this mean for you?Very high built-up often raises heat and runoff while reducing open environmental buffers.

💡 Night-time Lights

Final Score: 22.2/100 ↑ Higher is Better

ℹ️ What is Night-time Lights?Nighttime lights are a proxy for economic activity and electrification intensity.

Avg Radiance

11.10

Higher better

Max Radiance

20.83

Context

NTL Score

22.2

0-100

Scoring Breakdown

Parameter	Value	Target / Rule	Status
Avg Radiance	11.10	Scaled to 50	Score = min(100, avg/50*100)
NTL Score	22.2	0-100	Computed

Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison

Parameter	1000m	3000m	Average (Final)
Avg Radiance	12.29	9.92	11.10
Max Radiance	23.18	18.47	20.83
NTL Score	24.6	19.8	22.2

💡 What does this mean for you?Higher radiance often indicates stronger urban activity but can correlate with light pollution.

🏞️ Water Bodies

Final Score: 100.0/100 ↑ Higher is Better

ℹ️ What is Water Bodies?Water-bodies score reflects permanent and seasonal water presence in the analysis radius.

Permanent Water

63.35%

Higher generally better

Seasonal Water

97.59%

Context

Water Score

100.0

0-100

Scoring Breakdown

Parameter	Value	Target / Rule	Status
Permanent Water %	63.35%	70% weight	Scaled against 10%
Seasonal Water %	97.59%	30% weight	Scaled against 20%
Water Score	100.0	0-100	Computed

Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison

Parameter	1000m	3000m	Average (Final)
Permanent Water %	61.41%	65.29%	63.35%
Seasonal Water %	97.67%	97.51%	97.59%
Water Score	100.0	100.0	100.0

💡 What does this mean for you?Water presence can support cooling, recharge and ecological quality.

👥 Population Density

Final Score: 94.4/100 ↑ Higher is Better

ℹ️ What is Population Density?Population density indicates urban crowding pressure around the area.

Population

13,209

Estimated residents

Density/km²

1,112.8

Lower better for this score

Score

94.4

0-100

Scoring Breakdown

Parameter	Value	Target / Rule	Status
Density/km²	1,112.8	Inverse scale up to 20,000	Lower -> higher score
Score	94.4	0-100	Computed

Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison

Parameter	1000m	3000m	Average (Final)
Population Total	4,564	21,853	13,209
Density / km²	1,452.6	772.9	1,112.8
Pop Density Score	92.7	96.1	94.4

💡 What does this mean for you?Extremely high density can increase pressure on services and mobility.

⛲ Groundwater

Final Score: 65.3/100 ↑ Higher is Better

ℹ️ What is Groundwater?Groundwater score combines moisture, recharge, drought and trend indicators.

Soil Moisture

146.626

Higher better

Recharge

-0.81

Higher better

PDSI

2.99

Higher better

Scoring Breakdown

Parameter	Value	Target / Rule	Status
Soil Moisture	146.626	30% weight	Scaled
Recharge	-0.81	25% weight	Scaled
PDSI	2.99	20% weight	Scaled
SM Trend	0.0000	15% weight	Scaled
Precipitation	1,823.58	10% weight	Scaled

Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison

Parameter	1000m	3000m	Average (Final)
Soil Moisture	147.185	146.066	146.626
Recharge Estimate	-1.30	-0.33	-0.81
PDSI	3.03	2.95	2.99
Groundwater Score	65.4	65.1	65.3

💡 What does this mean for you?Higher score suggests better long-term aquifer and moisture support conditions.

🌧️ Waterlogging

↑ Higher is Better

ℹ️ What is Waterlogging?Waterlogging combines topography, imperviousness and wetness indices across nearby grid cells.

Grid Count

176

Sampled cells

Avg Susceptibility

42.7

Lower is safer

High Risk Grids

High / Very High

Scoring Breakdown

Parameter	Value	Target	Status
Avg Susceptibility	42.7	< 40	Concern
Avg Slope	2.37°	> 1°	Good
Avg Impervious	6.0%	< 70%	Good

💡 What does this mean for you?Higher susceptibility and low slope increase monsoon water stagnation probability.

🚶 Walkability & Safety

↑ Higher is Better

ℹ️ What is Walkability & Safety?OSM amenity metrics reflect pedestrian, safety and urban accessibility infrastructure.

Footpaths

Higher better

Street Lamps

Higher better

Police/Fire Access

Presence

Scoring Breakdown

Parameter	Value	Target / Rule	Status
Footpaths (500m)	0	≥ 3	Concern
Sidewalk Roads (1km)	0	≥ 5	Concern
Nearest Police Station	— m	≤ 2000m	Context

💡 What does this mean for you?Higher OSM accessibility/safety features generally improve everyday livability.

🌬️ Air Quality: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.

Component	Value	Weight/Rule	Contribution
Source	area_scores (latest by score_date)	Pipeline	Weighted model in backend

Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.

Final: See card score

💧 Water Quality: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.

Component	Value	Weight/Rule	Contribution
Source	area_scores (latest by score_date)	Pipeline	Weighted model in backend

Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.

Final: See card score

🧹 Sanitation: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.

Component	Value	Weight/Rule	Contribution
Source	area_scores (latest by score_date)	Pipeline	Weighted model in backend

Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.

Final: See card score

🛣️ Infrastructure: Infrastructure Score Formula

Formula: Composite weighted model from GHSL/ESA/VIIRS/Terrain features

Component	Value	Weight/Rule	Contribution
Urbanization index	27.13	20%	SMOD
Built-up balance	8.3%	15%	Best in moderate band
NTL stability	44.0%	15%	Power/activity consistency
Avg building height	1.02 m	10%	Vertical infra proxy
Impervious %	21.4%	10%	Moderate is optimal
Radiance	9.79	10%	Development proxy
Slope	0.10°	10%	Flatter is better
Green support	4.7%	10%	Tree + grass contribution

This is the same weighted structure used in Livability Infrastructure model.

Final: 35.09 / 100

🏥 Amenities: Amenity Score Breakdown

Formula: Each amenity category is capped at 100, final score is averaged across categories

Component	Value	Weight/Rule	Contribution
Hospitals 500m	0 * 33	Cap 100	Health access
Schools 1km	3 * 20	Cap 100	Education access
Markets 1km	1 * 33	Cap 100	Daily needs
Parks 500m	1 * 33	Cap 100	Open space
Transit 1km	0 * 50	Cap 100	Mobility

Category multipliers mirror the Livability snapshot logic.

Final: Final from amenity_scores table

🌳 Green Cover: Green Score Formula

Formula: Score = (NDVI*40%) + (Vegetation*30%) + (Dense Green*20%) + (Parks*10%)

Component	Value	Weight/Rule	Contribution
NDVI component	0.319 => 63.8	40%	25.5
Vegetation component	40.5% => 40.5	30%	12.1
Dense green component	22.8% => 45.7	20%	9.1
Parks component	1 => 33.0	10%	3.3

This matches the Livability GreenCover model weighting logic.

Final: 50.10 / 100

🔊 Noise: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.

Component	Value	Weight/Rule	Contribution
Source	area_scores (latest by score_date)	Pipeline	Weighted model in backend

Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.

Final: See card score

🌊 Flood Risk: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.

Component	Value	Weight/Rule	Contribution
Source	area_scores (latest by score_date)	Pipeline	Weighted model in backend

Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.

Final: See card score

🏚️ Earthquake Risk: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.

Component	Value	Weight/Rule	Contribution
Source	area_scores (latest by score_date)	Pipeline	Weighted model in backend

Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.

Final: See card score

🌡️ Land Surface Temp: LST Score Formula

Formula: Score = ((45 - LST Mean) / 25) * 100, clipped to [0,100]

Component	Value	Weight/Rule	Contribution
LST Mean	29.90 °C	Reference	20°C best, 45°C worst

Lower land surface temperature means better livability.

Final: 60.40 / 100

🏗️ Built-up Density: Built-up Score Formula

Formula: Score = 100 - Built-up %

Component	Value	Weight/Rule	Contribution
Built-up %	8.3%	Inverse	Lower is better

Dense concrete surfaces reduce infiltration and increase heat islands.

Final: 91.71 / 100

💡 Night-time Lights: Night-time Lights Formula

Formula: Score = min(100, (Avg Radiance / 50) * 100)

Component	Value	Weight/Rule	Contribution
Avg Radiance	11.10	Scale 0-50	Higher indicates activity

Higher night radiance generally tracks electrification and economic intensity.

Final: 22.21 / 100

🏞️ Water Bodies: Water Bodies Score Formula

Formula: Score = (Permanent Water Score * 70%) + (Seasonal Water Score * 30%)

Component	Value	Weight/Rule	Contribution
Permanent water	63.35%	70%	Scaled against 10% benchmark
Seasonal water	97.59%	30%	Scaled against 20% benchmark

Permanent water has higher score weight than seasonal water.

Final: 100.00 / 100

👥 Population Density: Population Density Formula

Formula: Score = ((20000 - density_per_km²) / 20000) * 100, clipped to [0,100]

Component	Value	Weight/Rule	Contribution
Density	1,112.8 /km²	Inverse scale	Lower density -> higher score

This follows the Livability PopulationDensity model.

Final: 94.44 / 100

⛲ Groundwater: Groundwater Score Formula

Formula: Weighted: Soil Moisture 30% + Recharge 25% + PDSI 20% + Trend 15% + Precipitation 10%

Component	Value	Weight/Rule	Contribution
Soil moisture	146.626	30%	Scaled to 0-200
Recharge estimate	-0.81	25%	Scaled -200 to +400
PDSI	2.99	20%	Scaled -4 to +4
SM trend	0.0000	15%	Scaled -50 to +50
Precipitation	1,823.58	10%	Scaled 800 to 1800

Exactly reused from Livability Groundwater model logic.

Final: 65.26 / 100

🌧️ Waterlogging: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.

Component	Value	Weight/Rule	Contribution
Source	area_scores (latest by score_date)	Pipeline	Weighted model in backend

Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.

Final: See card score

🚶 Walkability & Safety: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.

Component	Value	Weight/Rule	Contribution
Source	area_scores (latest by score_date)	Pipeline	Weighted model in backend

Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.

Final: See card score

View full livability report for Sector 23 →

Compliance Status

RERA registration, filings, and compliance flags based on public CG-RERA records.

Compliance Status Based on public CG-RERA records

4 Passed

2 N/A

RERA Registration Active

Reg No. PCGRERA141022001540 — Status: New

Section 3 · Source · View Certificate · RERA Official Page

No RERA Orders

No complaints or orders found against this project

Sec 38–63 · Source

No Orders in Last 12 Months

Clean record — no complaints or orders filed

Source

Within Timeline

Target completion: 02 Oct 2027

Section 4 · Source

Quarterly Updates Not Available

No compliance snapshot data on record

Section 11 · Source

Annual Audit Not Available

No compliance snapshot data on record

Section 4(2)(l)(D) · Source

Each check is based on publicly available CG-RERA portal data as of Apr 2026. How this works →

Other Projects by Same Promoter (30)

Project	RERA No.	Status	District	Type
avinash ONE	PCGRERA260721001237	New	Raipur	Mixed Development
avinash capital homes -i	PCGRERA060718000479	Ongoing	Raipur	Residential Development
AVINASH COSMOCITY	PCGRERA110325001893	New	Raipur	Residential Plotted Development
Avinash Eco city	PCGRERA031024001835	New	Raipur	Residential Plotted Development
avinash elegance	PCGRERA241221001307	New	Raipur	Residential Development
AVINASH ELITE HOMES	PCGRERA291218000883	New	Raipur	Plotted Development
avinash emporio	PCGRERA120424001759	New	Raipur	Commercial Development
avinash metropolis	PCGRERA290819001030	New	Durg	Residential Development
AVINASH NEOPOLIS PHASE-1	PCGRERA301024001843	New	Raipur	Mixed Development
AVINASH NEW COUNTY	PCGRERA080618000115	Ongoing	Raipur	Residential Development
avinash one extension	PCGRERA220722001480	New	Raipur	Mixed Development
AVINASH PEARL	PCGRERA050618000026	Ongoing	Raipur	Residential Development
Avinash pride	PCGRERA191222001563	New	Raipur	Residential Plotted Development
avinash pride	PCGRERA180618000228	Ongoing	Raipur	Mixed Development
AVINASH SUN CITY	PCGRERA060618000063	Ongoing	Raipur	Plotted Development
AVINASH TIMES SQUARE	PCGRERA290618000391	Ongoing	Raipur	Commercial Development
AVINASH UPWAN phase -1	PCGRERA280225001884	New	Raipur	Residential Development
AVINASH UPWAN phase -2	PCGRERA280225001883	New	Raipur	Residential Development
life style empressa	PCGRERA050618000027	Ongoing	Raipur	Commercial Development
magneto signature homes - ii	PCGRERA050618000028	Ongoing	Raipur	Plotted Development
magneto signature homes -I	PCGRERA040718000452	Ongoing	Raipur	Residential Development
MAGNETO SIGNATURE HOMES -II APARTMENT	PCGRERA090519000973	New	Raipur	Residential Development
MAGNETO THE MALL	PCGRERA290618000392	Ongoing	Raipur	Commercial Development
maruti life style tower	PCGRERA131120001163	New	Raipur	Residential Development
MARUTI LIFESTYLE	PCGRERA290618000395	Ongoing	Raipur	Residential Development
MARUTI LIFESTYLE - 1	PCGRERA150618000200	Ongoing	Raipur	Residential Development
maruti lifestyle - 4	PCGRERA150618000202	Ongoing	Raipur	Residential Development
MARUTI LIFESTYLE - V	PCGRERA280618000379	Ongoing	Raipur	Residential Development
maruti lifestyle-2	PCGRERA220618000279	Ongoing	Raipur	Residential Development
MARUTI LIFESTYLE-3	PCGRERA300618000427	Ongoing	Raipur	Residential Development

Details

Registration, professional team, bank, promoters, and compliance history.

Registration Details

RERA Number: PCGRERA141022001540
Status: New
Project Type: Residential Development
Approved Date: 14 Oct 2022
Original End Date: 02 Oct 2027

EWS Category: NO
Construction Cost: ₹ 695450000
Land Cost: ₹ 436124000
Proposed Completion: 02 Oct 2027
Authorised Person: anand singhania
Website: www.avinashgroup.com/project/detail/the-lagoon

View on Map

Professional Team

Role	Name	License / Membership
Statutory CA	TAPAN KUMAR SHARMA	302107
Quarterly CA	Dinesh Dewangan	454646
Engineer	Vishek Bisen	1119
Architect	Akhilesh Gupta	CA/2009/46770

Promoters

AVINASH DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED Company

AVINASH DEVELOPERS PVT LTD Company

AVINASH DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD. THRU-SHRI ANAND SINGHANIA Company

avinash developers pvt. ltd. Company

Legal Orders & Cases

RERA legal orders, complaints, and case statistics filed against this project.

Legal Orders (0)

Complaint	Applicant	Section	Date	Source	PDF
No orders found for this project.

Location

Project address, coordinates, and nearby places.

Location Details

Address: VILLAGE - TUTA, SECTOR-24 POCKET A1, NAVA RAIPUR, ATAL NAGAR, DISTRICT RAIPUR (C.G.)
District: Raipur
Tehsil: Abhanpur
Coordinates: 21.1526207, 81.7599626 View on Map

Neighborhood Intelligence

Explore nearby infrastructure around this project. Toggle categories to show/hide on the map.

Neighborhood Map 3 km radius

RERA Projects Near AVINASH THE LAGOON 4 found within 3 km

#	Project	District	Status	Distance
1	QUINCE GOLF	Raipur	Ongoing	1.18 km
2	evaraa by deevee	Raipur	New	2.61 km
3	lakevilas	Raipur	New	2.64 km
4	naya raipur mukhyamantri awas yojna pmay sector-34	Raipur	Ongoing	2.74 km

Buyer Checklist

Documents and verifications a buyer should review before purchase.

Buyer Document Verification Checklist

Key documents a buyer should verify before purchasing in this project. Items marked Available have data on Seemankan.

11/14 verified

RERA Registration Certificate Available

Confirms the project is registered with RERA CG. Verify registration number, validity dates, and project details on the RERA portal.

RERA No: PCGRERA141022001540

View Certificate View on RERA Portal
Promoter Registration Certificate Available

Builder / colonizer company registration certificate. Confirms the promoter entity is a registered firm, company, or society.

Preview Preview
Approved Building / Sanction Plan Available

Building plan sanctioned by the local authority. Verify floor count, setbacks, and FSI compliance.

Preview Preview
Layout Plan Available

Approved layout showing plot divisions, roads, open spaces, and common areas.

Preview
Title Deed / Ownership Proof Available

Proof that the promoter legally owns the land. Verify via Sub-Registrar records.

Preview
Encumbrance Certificate Available

Confirms the property is free from legal dues, mortgages, or liens. Obtain from Sub-Registrar office.

Preview
Land Use / Diversion Certificate Available

Required if land was converted from agricultural to non-agricultural use.

Preview
Architect Certificate Available

Certification from a registered architect confirming structural plans and compliance.

View View View +15 more
Structural Engineer Certificate Available

Certification from a structural engineer confirming building safety and load-bearing capacity.

View View View +15 more
CA Financial Certificate Available

Chartered Accountant certificate on financial status, project cost estimates, and fund utilization.

Preview View View +12 more
Commencement Certificate Verify Independently

Permission to begin construction issued by the local authority after plan approval.
NOCs (No Objection Certificates) Verify Independently

NOCs from fire department, environment, water supply, electricity board, and other authorities.
Project Brochure / Specification Available

Official brochure with unit types, amenities, and specifications. Compare with actual delivery.

View View View +13 more
RERA Compliance Orders Verify Independently

Check if any orders, penalties, or directions have been issued against this project by RERA.

Risk Zone Within 5 km

Buffer zones (water bodies, airport restrictions) and risk sites (landfills, waste processing) detected within 3 km (immediate) and 5 km (extended) of the project.

Risk zones (within 5 km)

3 km: 4 3–5 km: 3

Water bodies (river/nala/lake)

3 km: 3 3–5 km: 1

Landfill / waste sites

3 km: 1 3–5 km: 1

Airport buffer overlap

3 km: 0 3–5 km: 1

Risk Zone Map (3 km & 5 km rings) Project marker centered

Water Bodies (4)

Nava Raipur Sector 27 Lake ≤3 km

Lake · 75m buffer

1.86 km
Nava Raipur Central Lake ≤3 km

Lake · 75m buffer

2.5 km
Nava Raipur Sector 24 Lake ≤3 km

Lake · 75m buffer

2.66 km
Jungle Safari Lake (Nandanvan) 3–5 km

Lake · 75m buffer

3.66 km

Landfill / Waste Sites (2)

Nava Raipur Integrated Waste Management Facility ≤3 km

Waste processing · 200m buffer

2.23 km
Nava Raipur C&D Waste Processing Plant 3–5 km

Waste processing · 200m buffer

3.66 km

Airport (1)

Swami Vivekananda Airport 3–5 km

RPR / VARP · DGCA height limits apply

3.79 km

Reviews

Verified buyer reviews and ratings for this project.

No reviews yet. Be the first to review this project!

Login to Write a Review

You need to be signed in to submit a review for this project.