You're viewing a preview. Log in or create a free account to see the full page.
RealEstateIQTM
IN हिन्दी
Login Sign Up Free
Want a full project intelligence report? Download a detailed PDF report — RERA compliance, promoter, financials, amenities, location & risk.
Generate Project Report
Home / RERA Projects / U B WORLD
NEW Residential Development RERA Page Project Website
GENERATE REPORT

U B WORLD

Compliance Status
Compliant
22.0665, 82.1850 Explore area
District
Bilaspur
Area
Torwa
Promoter
U B GROUP
Project Information
Promoter U B GROUP
Type Residential Development
Status New
Completion 09 Nov 2029
RERA No. PCGRERA130225001879
Registered 13 Feb 2025
Original End 09 Jul 2029
Total Units 72 · 27 sold
EWS Category NO
Construction Cost ₹ 202688000
Land Cost ₹ 38577000
Authorised Person Manish Kumar Ubhrani
Website www.ubworld.info
Address TORWA, PATWARI HALKA NO 37, KH NO 15004 (1280/2, 1280/31)
At a Glance
72
Total Units
27
Units Sold
38
Unsold
0
Legal Cases
Nov 2029
Target Completion
35%
Completion
Amenities & Facilities (15)
3km Nearby Commercial (20)
100%
3km Nearby Connectivity (1)
8%
3km Nearby Hospitals (20)
100%
3km Nearby Parks (20)
100%
3km Nearby Restaurants (20)
100%
3km Nearby Schools (20)
100%
BOUNDARY WALL
0%
ENERGY MAANAGEMENT
0%
FIRE PROTECTION AND FIRE SAFETY REQUIREMENTS
0%
LANDSCAPING AND TREE PLANTING
0%
SECURITY SERVICE
0%
SEWERAGE
0%
STORM WATER DRAINS
0%
WATER CONSERVATION RAIN WATER HARVESTING
0%
WATER SUPPLY
0%
Project Professionals
ANKITA AGRAWAL
STATUTORY CA
MAYANK SARAF
QUARTERLY CA
VAIBHAO KESHARWANI
ENGINEER
ABHISHEK SHRIVASTAVA
ARCHITECT
Project Analysis

360° Project Intelligence

Comprehensive analysis across regulatory, livability, market, filing activity, and market readiness dimensions.

Regulatory
86
12 of 14 checks · Strong Signals
Livability
60
Dayalband · Moderate Signals
Legal
0
No legal orders on record · 30 nearby
Filing Activity
128
110 docs · 18 quarterly updates
Market Readiness
25
New · due Nov 2029
Area Livability

Livability of Dayalband

Eighteen environmental, infrastructure and amenity parameters for the nearest mapped area (Dayalband — 1.65 km from this project). Click any parameter for the underlying readings, thresholds and what they mean.



🏠 Livability Parameters

Latest readings for Dayalband. Only parameters with available data are shown below. Based on the latest readings for Dayalband.

C
Composite Score
59.6 /100
Average

🌬️ Air Quality

Final Score: 32.0/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Air Quality?AQI summarizes PM2.5, PM10 and gases. Lower pollution values improve public health outcomes.
AQI
68
Satisfactory
PM2.5
13.7 µg/m³
≤ 40
PM10
42.3 µg/m³
≤ 60
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
PM2.5 13.7 µg/m³ ≤ 40
Good
PM10 42.3 µg/m³ ≤ 60
Good
NO₂ 16.1 µg/m³ ≤ 40
Good
💡 What does this mean for you?Cleaner air lowers respiratory burden and improves outdoor comfort.

💧 Water Quality

Final Score: 75.0/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Water Quality?Water quality combines chemistry, supply duration and contamination markers.
TDS
300 ppm
≤ 500
pH
7.30
6.5–8.5
Supply
5.0 hr/day
≥ 8 hr
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
TDS 300 ppm ≤ 500
Good
Fluoride 0.60 mg/L ≤ 1.0
Good
Turbidity 3.0 NTU ≤ 1
Concern
💡 What does this mean for you?Better supply quality and consistency reduces dependence on tanker/groundwater fallback.

🧹 Sanitation

Final Score: 59.1/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Sanitation?Sanitation reflects ODF status, sewage treatment and waste management regularity.
ODF
ODF+
ODF++
Sewage Coverage
48%
≥ 80%
Drainage
50%
≥ 90%
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
ODF Status ODF+ ODF++
Info
Sewage Coverage 48% ≥ 80%
Concern
Drainage Coverage 50% ≥ 90%
Concern
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher sanitation maturity lowers disease exposure and neighborhood nuisance.

🛣️ Infrastructure

Final Score: 78.6/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Infrastructure?Infrastructure score combines land use, urbanization, built form, night lights and terrain indicators.
Built-up
50.3%
Balanced band
Tree Cover
31.6%
≥ 15%
Urbanization
100.0
Higher better
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Built-up (LULC) 50.3% 40-70%
Contextual
Impervious Surface 16.9% < 70%
Good
NDVI Mean 0.340 > 0.3
Good
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Built-up (LULC) % 46.9% 53.6% 50.3%
Tree Cover % 35.5% 27.6% 31.6%
Urbanization Index 100.0 100.0 100.0
Infra Score 78.0 79.2 78.9
💡 What does this mean for you?Balanced built + green mix usually improves long-term livability resilience.

🏥 Amenities

Final Score: 68.9/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Amenities?Amenity score captures daily-access services in walk/short-drive radii.
Hospitals 500m
1
Target ≥1
Schools 1km
20
Target ≥3
Parks 500m
0
Target ≥1
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Hospitals (500m) 1 ≥1
Good
Schools (1km) 20 ≥3
Good
Markets (1km) 20 ≥1
Good
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher local amenity density improves convenience and walkability.

🌳 Green Cover

Final Score: 46.7/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Green Cover?NDVI and vegetation structure are measured from satellite imagery to estimate neighborhood greenery.
NDVI Mean
0.276
Greenness index
Vegetation
70.6%
% green pixels
Dense Green
15.8%
Thick canopy
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
NDVI Mean 0.276 0.5 maps to score 100
Weighted 40%
Vegetation % 70.6% Direct % (cap 100)
Weighted 30%
Dense Green % 15.8% Scaled from 50%
Weighted 20%
Parks within 500m 0 Count * 33 (cap 100)
Weighted 10%
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
NDVI Mean 0.286 0.266 0.276
Vegetation % 71.2% 70.0% 70.6%
Dense Green % 20.5% 11.2% 15.8%
Tree Canopy % 14.3% 7.8% 11.1%
Green Score 52.4 46.7 49.6
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher green metrics typically reduce heat stress and improve comfort.

🔊 Noise

Final Score: 37.2/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Noise?Noise uses measured day/night dB compared to CPCB zone limits.
Day dB
66.4
vs CPCB day limit
Night dB
56.4
vs CPCB night limit
Zone
commercial
CPCB class
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Day Noise 66.4 dB ≤ 65.0 dB
Concern
Night Noise 56.4 dB ≤ 55.0 dB
Concern
Nearest Highway 38 m Higher usually quieter
Info
💡 What does this mean for you?Chronic high noise impacts stress, sleep quality and perceived comfort.

🌊 Flood Risk

Final Score: 62.5/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Flood Risk?Flood risk combines river exposure and local waterlogging vulnerability.
Overall Risk
Low-Medium
Lower is safer
River Risk
Low
Lower is safer
Waterlogging
Medium
Lower is safer
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Overall Risk Low-Medium Low preferred
Info
River Flood Risk Low Low preferred
Info
Waterlogging Risk Medium Low preferred
Info
💡 What does this mean for you?Lower flood risk means less disruption and lower hazard exposure.

🏚️ Earthquake Risk

Final Score: 90.0/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Earthquake Risk?Earthquake profile uses seismic zone, PGA and soil/liquefaction risk factors.
Seismic Zone
Zone II
Lower risk zone preferred
Risk Level
Low
Low preferred
Liquefaction
None
Low preferred
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Seismic Zone Zone II II preferred
Info
Risk Level Low Low preferred
Info
PGA (475yr) 0.0155g Lower preferred
Info
💡 What does this mean for you?Lower seismic hazard reduces structural and insurance risk exposure.

🌡️ Land Surface Temp

Final Score: 60.5/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Land Surface Temp?Land Surface Temperature reflects heat-island intensity from satellite thermal bands.
LST Mean
29.9°C
Lower better
LST Min
24.2°C
Context
LST Max
37.4°C
Lower better
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
LST Mean 29.9°C 20°C best / 45°C worst
Weighted by formula
LST Score 60.5 0-100
Computed
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
LST Mean (°C) 29.5 30.2 29.9
LST Min (°C) 23.9 24.5 24.2
LST Max (°C) 36.8 38.1 37.4
LST Score 62.0 59.1 60.5
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher heat exposure affects comfort, cooling load and health risk.

🏗️ Built-up Density

Final Score: 49.7/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Built-up Density?Built-up density measures extent of developed surface versus open space.
Built-up %
50.3%
Lower better
Open Space %
49.7%
Higher better
Built-up Score
49.7
0-100
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Built-up % 50.3% Inverse scoring
Score = 100 - builtup%
Open Space % 49.7% Context
Info
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Built-up % 46.9% 53.6% 50.3%
Open Space % 53.1% 46.4% 49.7%
Built-up Score 53.1 46.4 49.7
💡 What does this mean for you?Very high built-up often raises heat and runoff while reducing open environmental buffers.

💡 Night-time Lights

Final Score: 56.5/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Night-time Lights?Nighttime lights are a proxy for economic activity and electrification intensity.
Avg Radiance
28.25
Higher better
Max Radiance
44.17
Context
NTL Score
56.5
0-100
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Avg Radiance 28.25 Scaled to 50
Score = min(100, avg/50*100)
NTL Score 56.5 0-100
Computed
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Avg Radiance 30.43 26.07 28.25
Max Radiance 47.30 41.04 44.17
NTL Score 60.9 52.1 56.5
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher radiance often indicates stronger urban activity but can correlate with light pollution.

🏞️ Water Bodies

Final Score: 36.9/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Water Bodies?Water-bodies score reflects permanent and seasonal water presence in the analysis radius.
Permanent Water
0.99%
Higher generally better
Seasonal Water
74.97%
Context
Water Score
36.9
0-100
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Permanent Water % 0.99% 70% weight
Scaled against 10%
Seasonal Water % 74.97% 30% weight
Scaled against 20%
Water Score 36.9 0-100
Computed
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Permanent Water % 0.00% 1.97% 0.99%
Seasonal Water % 67.35% 82.59% 74.97%
Water Score 30.0 43.8 36.9
💡 What does this mean for you?Water presence can support cooling, recharge and ecological quality.

👥 Population Density

Final Score: 61.7/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Population Density?Population density indicates urban crowding pressure around the area.
Population
113,054
Estimated residents
Density/km²
7,652.3
Lower better for this score
Score
61.7
0-100
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Density/km² 7,652.3 Inverse scale up to 20,000
Lower -> higher score
Score 61.7 0-100
Computed
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Population Total 25,827 200,280 113,054
Density / km² 8,221.1 7,083.5 7,652.3
Pop Density Score 58.9 64.6 61.7
💡 What does this mean for you?Extremely high density can increase pressure on services and mobility.

🚶 Walkability & Safety

↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Walkability & Safety?OSM amenity metrics reflect pedestrian, safety and urban accessibility infrastructure.
Footpaths
0
Higher better
Street Lamps
0
Higher better
Police/Fire Access
3
Presence
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Footpaths (500m) 0 ≥ 3
Concern
Sidewalk Roads (1km) 0 ≥ 5
Concern
Nearest Police Station 1,115 m ≤ 2000m
Context
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher OSM accessibility/safety features generally improve everyday livability.

🌬️ Air Quality: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

💧 Water Quality: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🧹 Sanitation: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🛣️ Infrastructure: Infrastructure Score Formula

Formula: Composite weighted model from GHSL/ESA/VIIRS/Terrain features
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Urbanization index100.0020%SMOD
Built-up balance50.3%15%Best in moderate band
NTL stability68.0%15%Power/activity consistency
Avg building height6.58 m10%Vertical infra proxy
Impervious %16.9%10%Moderate is optimal
Radiance26.8910%Development proxy
Slope0.11°10%Flatter is better
Green support31.6%10%Tree + grass contribution
This is the same weighted structure used in Livability Infrastructure model.
Final: 78.90 / 100

🏥 Amenities: Amenity Score Breakdown

Formula: Each amenity category is capped at 100, final score is averaged across categories
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Hospitals 500m1 * 33Cap 100Health access
Schools 1km20 * 20Cap 100Education access
Markets 1km20 * 33Cap 100Daily needs
Parks 500m0 * 33Cap 100Open space
Transit 1km0 * 50Cap 100Mobility
Category multipliers mirror the Livability snapshot logic.
Final: Final from amenity_scores table

🌳 Green Cover: Green Score Formula

Formula: Score = (NDVI*40%) + (Vegetation*30%) + (Dense Green*20%) + (Parks*10%)
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
NDVI component0.276 => 55.240%22.1
Vegetation component70.6% => 70.630%21.2
Dense green component15.8% => 31.620%6.3
Parks component0 => 0.010%0.0
This matches the Livability GreenCover model weighting logic.
Final: 49.58 / 100

🔊 Noise: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🌊 Flood Risk: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🏚️ Earthquake Risk: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🌡️ Land Surface Temp: LST Score Formula

Formula: Score = ((45 - LST Mean) / 25) * 100, clipped to [0,100]
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
LST Mean29.87 °CReference20°C best, 45°C worst
Lower land surface temperature means better livability.
Final: 60.52 / 100

🏗️ Built-up Density: Built-up Score Formula

Formula: Score = 100 - Built-up %
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Built-up %50.3%InverseLower is better
Dense concrete surfaces reduce infiltration and increase heat islands.
Final: 49.74 / 100

💡 Night-time Lights: Night-time Lights Formula

Formula: Score = min(100, (Avg Radiance / 50) * 100)
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Avg Radiance28.25Scale 0-50Higher indicates activity
Higher night radiance generally tracks electrification and economic intensity.
Final: 56.49 / 100

🏞️ Water Bodies: Water Bodies Score Formula

Formula: Score = (Permanent Water Score * 70%) + (Seasonal Water Score * 30%)
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Permanent water0.99%70%Scaled against 10% benchmark
Seasonal water74.97%30%Scaled against 20% benchmark
Permanent water has higher score weight than seasonal water.
Final: 36.93 / 100

👥 Population Density: Population Density Formula

Formula: Score = ((20000 - density_per_km²) / 20000) * 100, clipped to [0,100]
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Density7,652.3 /km²Inverse scaleLower density -> higher score
This follows the Livability PopulationDensity model.
Final: 61.74 / 100

🚶 Walkability & Safety: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

View full livability report for Dayalband →

Compliance Status

RERA registration, filings, and compliance flags based on public CG-RERA records.

Compliance Status Based on public CG-RERA records
4 Passed
2 N/A
RERA Registration Active
Reg No. PCGRERA130225001879 — Status: New
Section 3 · Source · RERA Official Page
No RERA Orders
No complaints or orders found against this project
Sec 38–63 · Source
No Orders in Last 12 Months
Clean record — no complaints or orders filed
Source
Within Timeline
Target completion: 09 Nov 2029
Section 4 · Source
Quarterly Updates Not Available
No compliance snapshot data on record
Section 11 · Source
Annual Audit Not Available
No compliance snapshot data on record
Section 4(2)(l)(D) · Source
Each check is based on publicly available CG-RERA portal data as of Nov 2026. How this works →

Details

Registration, professional team, bank, promoters, and compliance history.

Registration Details
RERA Number
PCGRERA130225001879
Status
New
Project Type
Residential Development
Approved Date
13 Feb 2025
Original End Date
09 Jul 2029
EWS Category
NO
Construction Cost
₹ 202688000
Land Cost
₹ 38577000
Proposed Completion
09 Nov 2029
Authorised Person
Manish Kumar Ubhrani
Website
www.ubworld.info
View on Map
Professional Team
RoleNameLicense / Membership
Statutory CA Ankita Agrawal 180201
Quarterly CA Mayank Saraf 177706
Engineer VAIBHAO KESHARWANI 370
Architect Abhishek shrivastava 146
Promoters
U
U B Group Partnership Firm

Buildings & Units

Inventory overview, sold/unsold breakdown, and building details.

Inventory Overview
72
Total Inventory
27
Sold (38%)
38
Unsold (53%)
7
Mortgage (10%)
38%
53%
10%
Sold Unsold Mortgage
Quarterly Plot Updates
PeriodTotalSold (prev)Sold (qtr)RemainingMortgage
2026-04-01 – 2026-06-30 0 0 0 0 0
2026-01-01 – 2026-03-31 0 0 0 0 0
2025-10-01 – 2025-12-31 0 0 0 0 0
2025-07-01 – 2025-09-30 0 0 0 0 0
2025-04-01 – 2025-06-30 0 0 0 0 0
2025-02-13 – 2025-03-31 0 0 0 0 0
Quarterly Building Updates
PeriodTotalSold (prev)Sold (qtr)RemainingMortgage
2026-04-01 – 2026-06-30 0 0 0 0 0
2026-01-01 – 2026-03-31 0 0 0 0 0
2025-10-01 – 2025-12-31 0 0 0 0 0
2025-07-01 – 2025-09-30 0 0 0 0 0
2025-04-01 – 2025-06-30 0 0 0 0 0
2025-02-13 – 2025-03-31 0 0 0 0 0
Quarterly Apartment Updates
PeriodTotalSold (prev)Sold (qtr)RemainingMortgage
2026-04-01 – 2026-06-30 72 25 2 45 7
2026-01-01 – 2026-03-31 72 22 4 47 7
2025-10-01 – 2025-12-31 72 15 7 50 7
2025-07-01 – 2025-09-30 72 0 15 57 7
2025-04-01 – 2025-06-30 72 0 0 72 7
2025-02-13 – 2025-03-31 72 0 0 72 7

Legal Orders & Cases

RERA legal orders, complaints, and case statistics filed against this project.

Legal Orders (0)
ComplaintApplicantSectionDateSourcePDF
No orders found for this project.

Location

Project address, coordinates, and nearby places.

Location Details
Address
TORWA, PATWARI HALKA NO 37, KH NO 15004 (1280/2, 1280/31)
District
Bilaspur
Tehsil
Bilaspur
Coordinates
22.0665390, 82.1849588 View on Map
Stored 3km Amenities (Latest Refresh)
Amenity Count Coverage
3km Nearby Commercial 20 100%
3km Nearby Connectivity 1 8%
3km Nearby Hospitals 20 100%
3km Nearby Parks 20 100%
3km Nearby Restaurants 20 100%
3km Nearby Schools 20 100%
Area Livability

Livability of Dayalband Bilaspur

Environmental, infrastructure & amenity parameters for the area where this project is located (1.65 km from project). Each value is compared with the Bilaspur average.

Composite Livability Score
59.6 / 100
Grade C · Average
-2.4 vs Bilaspur avg (62.0)
Air Quality
32.0 Poor
Area
32
City
30
+2.5 vs city avg
Water Quality
75.0 Good
Area
75
City
71
+3.8 vs city avg
Sanitation
59.1 Average
Area
59
City
59
+0.0 vs city avg
Green Cover
46.7 Below Avg
Area
47
City
50
-2.9 vs city avg
Noise Level
37.2 Below Avg
Area
37
City
55
-17.8 vs city avg
Infrastructure
78.6 Good
Area
79
City
68
+10.9 vs city avg
Amenities
68.9 Good
Area
69
City
59
+9.9 vs city avg
Flood Safety
62.5 Average
Area
63
City
70
-7.6 vs city avg
Earthquake Safety
90.0 Excellent
Area
90
City
90
+0.0 vs city avg
Land Surface Temp.
60.5 Average
Area
61
City
59
+2.0 vs city avg
Built-up Density
49.7 Below Avg
Area
50
City
55
-5.5 vs city avg
Night-light Activity
56.5 Average
Area
56
City
42
+14.9 vs city avg
Water Bodies Nearby
36.9 Below Avg
Area
37
City
67
-30.3 vs city avg
Population Density
61.7 Average
Area
62
City
73
-10.8 vs city avg
Groundwater Status
62.2 Average
Area
62
City
62
+0.7 vs city avg
View detailed livability report for Dayalband
Neighborhood Intelligence

Explore nearby infrastructure around this project. Toggle categories to show/hide on the map.

Neighborhood Map 3 km radius
RERA Projects Near U B WORLD 30 found within 3 km
# Project District Status Distance
1 ROYAL RESIDENCY PHASE - III Bilaspur New 0.03 km
2 atlantic imperial Bilaspur New 0.40 km
3 SAI BHOOMI Bilaspur Ongoing 0.47 km
4 LAKE TOWN Bilaspur New 0.63 km
5 j.p. park block- tulip Bilaspur Ongoing 0.80 km
6 pmay (87 dus) at bandhwapara bilaspur Bilaspur Ongoing 0.80 km
7 j.p. park block - lily Bilaspur Ongoing 0.82 km
8 BALAJI PLAZA Bilaspur New 0.97 km
9 J.P. RESIDENCY Bilaspur Ongoing 1.04 km
10 sai kunj Bilaspur New 1.16 km
11 sheela park - 2 Bilaspur New 1.36 km
12 sheela vihar - 2 Bilaspur New 1.51 km
13 SHEELA VIHAR Bilaspur Ongoing 1.60 km
14 ambe residency Bilaspur Ongoing 1.63 km
15 CONSTRUCTION OF 28 no. MIG,95 no.lig ,50 no. EWS HOUSES at deorikhurd,bilaspur Bilaspur New 1.67 km
16 pmay at (87 dus) raj kishor nagar mopka bilaspur Bilaspur Ongoing 1.67 km
17 MAHAVIR ELITE Bilaspur Ongoing 1.75 km
18 mahavir city Bilaspur Ongoing 1.78 km
19 GAYATRI PARISAR Bilaspur Ongoing 1.83 km
20 pmay at (406dus) madhuban bilaspur Bilaspur Ongoing 1.86 km
21 MAHAVIR HEIGHTS Bilaspur Ongoing 1.88 km
22 GAYATRI PARISAR Bilaspur Ongoing 1.90 km
23 GANESH VALLEY Bilaspur Ongoing 1.99 km
24 amba park phase -2 Bilaspur New 1.99 km
25 vaishali valencia Bilaspur Ongoing 2.00 km
26 GEETA HERITAGE Bilaspur Ongoing 2.04 km
27 POOJA CITY Bilaspur New 2.21 km
28 SWARNA RESIDENCY PHASE- II Bilaspur Ongoing 2.23 km
29 anand niketan Bilaspur New 2.31 km
30 SWARN PLAZA Bilaspur New 2.33 km

Buyer Checklist

Documents and verifications a buyer should review before purchase.

Buyer Document Verification Checklist

Key documents a buyer should verify before purchasing in this project. Items marked Available have data on Seemankan.

11/14 verified
  • RERA Registration Certificate Available
    Confirms the project is registered with RERA CG. Verify registration number, validity dates, and project details on the RERA portal.
    RERA No: PCGRERA130225001879
    View on RERA Portal
  • Promoter Registration Certificate Available
    Builder / colonizer company registration certificate. Confirms the promoter entity is a registered firm, company, or society.
    Preview Preview
  • Approved Building / Sanction Plan Available
    Building plan sanctioned by the local authority. Verify floor count, setbacks, and FSI compliance.
    Preview Preview
  • Layout Plan Available
    Approved layout showing plot divisions, roads, open spaces, and common areas.
    Preview
  • Title Deed / Ownership Proof Available
    Proof that the promoter legally owns the land. Verify via Sub-Registrar records.
    Preview
  • Encumbrance Certificate Available
    Confirms the property is free from legal dues, mortgages, or liens. Obtain from Sub-Registrar office.
    Preview
  • Land Use / Diversion Certificate Available
    Required if land was converted from agricultural to non-agricultural use.
    Preview
  • Architect Certificate Available
    Certification from a registered architect confirming structural plans and compliance.
    View View View +9 more
  • Structural Engineer Certificate Available
    Certification from a structural engineer confirming building safety and load-bearing capacity.
    View View View +9 more
  • CA Financial Certificate Available
    Chartered Accountant certificate on financial status, project cost estimates, and fund utilization.
    Preview View View +5 more
  • Commencement Certificate Verify Independently
    Permission to begin construction issued by the local authority after plan approval.
  • NOCs (No Objection Certificates) Verify Independently
    NOCs from fire department, environment, water supply, electricity board, and other authorities.
  • Project Brochure / Specification Available
    Official brochure with unit types, amenities, and specifications. Compare with actual delivery.
    View View View +5 more
  • RERA Compliance Orders Verify Independently
    Check if any orders, penalties, or directions have been issued against this project by RERA.
Disclaimer: This checklist is for informational purposes only. "Available" means Seemankan has a copy from the RERA portal — it does not constitute legal verification. Always verify original documents with the concerned authorities and consult a legal advisor before making a purchase decision.

Risk Zone Within 5 km

Buffer zones (water bodies, airport restrictions) and risk sites (landfills, waste processing) detected within 3 km (immediate) and 5 km (extended) of the project.

0
Risk zones (within 5 km)
3 km: 0 3–5 km: 0
0
Water bodies (river/nala/lake)
3 km: 0 3–5 km: 0
0
Landfill / waste sites
3 km: 0 3–5 km: 0
0
Airport buffer overlap
3 km: 0 3–5 km: 0
Risk Zone Map (3 km & 5 km rings) Project marker centered
All Clear

No mapped risk zones within 3 km of this project.

Documents

RERA-filed documents and disclosures available for this project.

RERA Documents (110)
APARTMENTPHOTO (42)
View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View
ARCH (12)
View View View View View View View View View View View View
Ann19 (5)
View View View View View
BOROUCHRE (7)
View View View View View View View
BRIEF (1)
Preview
BUILDING (1)
Preview
CA (8)
Preview View View View View View View View
COLONIZER (1)
Preview
COMMON (1)
Preview
DEV (1)
Preview
DEVE (1)
Preview
DIVERSION (1)
Preview
Demarcation (1)
Preview
ENGG (12)
View View View View View View View View View View View View
ENUM (1)
Preview
FEESHEET (1)
Preview
LAYOUT (1)
Preview
PASSBOOK (1)
Preview
PHOTO (1)
Download
Reg (1)
Preview
SANCTIONBUILDING (1)
Preview
SEARCH (1)
Preview
SELF (1)
Preview
TAC (1)
Preview
other (6)
Preview Preview Preview Preview Preview Preview

Reviews

Verified buyer reviews and ratings for this project.

No reviews yet. Be the first to review this project!

Login to Write a Review

You need to be signed in to submit a review for this project.

Login or Register

Log in to see the full page

This page shows a preview. Sign in (or create a free account) to unlock the full content, charts, and downloads.

Log in Create account