Home / RERA Projects / KRISHNA SATTVAM PHASE 01
NEW Residential Development RERA Page Project Website
GENERATE REPORT

KRISHNA SATTVAM PHASE 01

Compliance Status
Compliant
21.2163, 81.5931 Explore area
District
Raipur
Area
—
Promoter
GOVIND REALTY
Project Information
Promoter GOVIND REALTY
Type Residential Development
Status New
Completion 10 Jun 2029
RERA No. PCGRERA220724001797
Registered 22 Jul 2024
Original End 10 Jun 2029
Total Units 154 · 84 sold
EWS Category NO
Construction Cost ₹ 492806000
Land Cost ₹ 51245000
Authorised Person Sunil kumar taparia
Website www.shreekrishnabuilder.com/ongoing-project.php?proj
Address opposite sadafaldev ashram, mahadevghat-bhatagaon raod raipur
At a Glance
154
Total Units
84
Units Sold
70
Unsold
0
Legal Cases
Jun 2029
Target Completion
11%
Completion
Amenities & Facilities (19)
BOUNDARY WALL
52%
CLUB HOUSE
0%
COMMUNITY BUILDINGS
0%
ENERGY MAANAGEMENT
0%
FIRE PROTECTION AND FIRE SAFETY REQUIREMENTS
0%
GYM
0%
INTERNAL ROADS AND FOOTPATHS
0%
LANDSCAPING AND TREE PLANTING
0%
OPEN PARKING
0%
PLACE OF WORSHIP
0%
SECURITY SERVICE
0%
SEWERAGE
0%
SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT AND DISPOSAL
0%
STORM WATER DRAINS
0%
STREET LIGHTING
0%
SWIMMING POOL
0%
TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL OF SEWERAGE AND SULLAGE WAT
0%
WATER CONSERVATION RAIN WATER HARVESTING
0%
WATER SUPPLY
1%
Project Professionals
PAWAN KUMAR BAID
STATUTORY CA
YATISH AGRAWAL
QUARTERLY CA
RAJENDRA JAIN
ENGINEER
SHASHIKANT KUJUR
ARCHITECT
Project Analysis

360° Project Intelligence

Comprehensive analysis across regulatory, livability, market, filing activity, and market readiness dimensions.

Regulatory
93
13 of 14 checks · Strong Signals
Livability
70
Mahadev Ghat Road · Moderate Signals
Legal
0
No legal orders on record · 30 nearby
Filing Activity
133
115 docs · 18 quarterly updates
Market Readiness
25
New · due Jun 2029
Area Livability

Livability of Mahadev Ghat Road

Eighteen environmental, infrastructure and amenity parameters for the nearest mapped area (Mahadev Ghat Road — 1.13 km from this project). Click any parameter for the underlying readings, thresholds and what they mean.



🏠 Livability Parameters

Latest readings for Mahadev Ghat Road. Only parameters with available data are shown below. Based on the latest readings for Mahadev Ghat Road.

B
Composite Score
70.1 /100
Good

🌬️ Air Quality

Final Score: 90.0/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Air Quality?AQI summarizes PM2.5, PM10 and gases. Lower pollution values improve public health outcomes.
AQI
75
Satisfactory
PM2.5
23.9 µg/m³
≤ 40
PM10
193.7 µg/m³
≤ 60
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
PM2.5 23.9 µg/m³ ≤ 40
Good
PM10 193.7 µg/m³ ≤ 60
Concern
NO₂ 22.5 µg/m³ ≤ 40
Good
💡 What does this mean for you?Cleaner air lowers respiratory burden and improves outdoor comfort.

💧 Water Quality

Final Score: 68.3/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Water Quality?Water quality combines chemistry, supply duration and contamination markers.
TDS
268 ppm
≤ 500
pH
7.55
6.5–8.5
Supply
6.2 hr/day
≥ 8 hr
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
TDS 268 ppm ≤ 500
Good
Fluoride 0.82 mg/L ≤ 1.0
Good
Turbidity 2.3 NTU ≤ 1
Concern
💡 What does this mean for you?Better supply quality and consistency reduces dependence on tanker/groundwater fallback.

🧹 Sanitation

Final Score: 65.3/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Sanitation?Sanitation reflects ODF status, sewage treatment and waste management regularity.
ODF
ODF+
ODF++
Sewage Coverage
59%
≥ 80%
Drainage
55%
≥ 90%
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
ODF Status ODF+ ODF++
Info
Sewage Coverage 59% ≥ 80%
Concern
Drainage Coverage 55% ≥ 90%
Concern
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher sanitation maturity lowers disease exposure and neighborhood nuisance.

🛣️ Infrastructure

Final Score: 51.2/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Infrastructure?Infrastructure score combines land use, urbanization, built form, night lights and terrain indicators.
Built-up
37.2%
Balanced band
Tree Cover
12.4%
≥ 15%
Urbanization
34.6
Higher better
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Built-up (LULC) 37.2% 40-70%
Contextual
Impervious Surface 22.7% < 70%
Good
NDVI Mean 0.316 > 0.3
Good
💡 What does this mean for you?Balanced built + green mix usually improves long-term livability resilience.

🏥 Amenities

Final Score: 78.7/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Amenities?Amenity score captures daily-access services in walk/short-drive radii.
Hospitals 500m
1
Target ≥1
Schools 1km
6
Target ≥3
Parks 500m
1
Target ≥1
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Hospitals (500m) 1 ≥1
Good
Schools (1km) 6 ≥3
Good
Markets (1km) 5 ≥1
Good
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher local amenity density improves convenience and walkability.

🌳 Green Cover

Final Score: 56.6/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Green Cover?NDVI and vegetation structure are measured from satellite imagery to estimate neighborhood greenery.
NDVI Mean
0.351
Greenness index
Vegetation
50.1%
% green pixels
Dense Green
32.0%
Thick canopy
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
NDVI Mean 0.351 0.5 maps to score 100
Weighted 40%
Vegetation % 50.1% Direct % (cap 100)
Weighted 30%
Dense Green % 32.0% Scaled from 50%
Weighted 20%
Parks within 500m 0 Count * 33 (cap 100)
Weighted 10%
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher green metrics typically reduce heat stress and improve comfort.

🔊 Noise

Final Score: 88.9/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Noise?Noise uses measured day/night dB compared to CPCB zone limits.
Day dB
45.0
vs CPCB day limit
Night dB
39.9
vs CPCB night limit
Zone
residential
CPCB class
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Day Noise 45.0 dB ≤ 55.0 dB
Good
Night Noise 39.9 dB ≤ 45.0 dB
Good
Nearest Highway 3,125 m Higher usually quieter
Info
💡 What does this mean for you?Chronic high noise impacts stress, sleep quality and perceived comfort.

🌊 Flood Risk

Final Score: 47.9/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Flood Risk?Flood risk combines river exposure and local waterlogging vulnerability.
Overall Risk
Medium
Lower is safer
River Risk
Medium
Lower is safer
Waterlogging
Low-Medium
Lower is safer
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Overall Risk Medium Low preferred
Info
River Flood Risk Medium Low preferred
Info
Waterlogging Risk Low-Medium Low preferred
Info
💡 What does this mean for you?Lower flood risk means less disruption and lower hazard exposure.

🏚️ Earthquake Risk

Final Score: 76.9/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Earthquake Risk?Earthquake profile uses seismic zone, PGA and soil/liquefaction risk factors.
Seismic Zone
II
Lower risk zone preferred
Risk Level
Low
Low preferred
Liquefaction
Low
Low preferred
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Seismic Zone II II preferred
Info
Risk Level Low Low preferred
Info
PGA (475yr) 0.063 Lower preferred
Info
💡 What does this mean for you?Lower seismic hazard reduces structural and insurance risk exposure.

🌡️ Land Surface Temp

Final Score: 65.1/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Land Surface Temp?Land Surface Temperature reflects heat-island intensity from satellite thermal bands.
LST Mean
28.7°C
Lower better
LST Min
13.5°C
Context
LST Max
37.0°C
Lower better
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
LST Mean 28.7°C 20°C best / 45°C worst
Weighted by formula
LST Score 65.1 0-100
Computed
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
LST Mean (°C) 29.9 27.5 28.7
LST Min (°C) 13.6 13.5 13.5
LST Max (°C) 36.3 37.8 37.0
LST Score 60.2 70.0 65.1
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher heat exposure affects comfort, cooling load and health risk.

🏗️ Built-up Density

Final Score: 67.5/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Built-up Density?Built-up density measures extent of developed surface versus open space.
Built-up %
32.5%
Lower better
Open Space %
67.5%
Higher better
Built-up Score
67.5
0-100
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Built-up % 32.5% Inverse scoring
Score = 100 - builtup%
Open Space % 67.5% Context
Info
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Built-up % 22.4% 42.5% 32.5%
Open Space % 77.6% 57.5% 67.5%
Built-up Score 77.6 57.5 67.5
💡 What does this mean for you?Very high built-up often raises heat and runoff while reducing open environmental buffers.

💡 Night-time Lights

Final Score: 15.3/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Night-time Lights?Nighttime lights are a proxy for economic activity and electrification intensity.
Avg Radiance
7.65
Higher better
Max Radiance
20.38
Context
NTL Score
15.3
0-100
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Avg Radiance 7.65 Scaled to 50
Score = min(100, avg/50*100)
NTL Score 15.3 0-100
Computed
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Avg Radiance 6.07 9.23 7.65
Max Radiance 22.56 18.19 20.38
NTL Score 12.1 18.5 15.3
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher radiance often indicates stronger urban activity but can correlate with light pollution.

🏞️ Water Bodies

Final Score: 81.7/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Water Bodies?Water-bodies score reflects permanent and seasonal water presence in the analysis radius.
Permanent Water
26.07%
Higher generally better
Seasonal Water
75.28%
Context
Water Score
100.0
0-100
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Permanent Water % 26.07% 70% weight
Scaled against 10%
Seasonal Water % 75.28% 30% weight
Scaled against 20%
Water Score 100.0 0-100
Computed
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Permanent Water % 34.02% 18.12% 26.07%
Seasonal Water % 72.37% 78.18% 75.28%
Water Score 100.0 63.4 100.0
💡 What does this mean for you?Water presence can support cooling, recharge and ecological quality.

👥 Population Density

Final Score: 89.9/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Population Density?Population density indicates urban crowding pressure around the area.
Population
29,983
Estimated residents
Density/km²
2,028.5
Lower better for this score
Score
89.9
0-100
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Density/km² 2,028.5 Inverse scale up to 20,000
Lower -> higher score
Score 89.9 0-100
Computed
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Population Total 6,843 53,122 29,983
Density / km² 2,178.2 1,878.8 2,028.5
Pop Density Score 89.1 90.6 89.9
💡 What does this mean for you?Extremely high density can increase pressure on services and mobility.

⛲ Groundwater

Final Score: 62.0/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Groundwater?Groundwater score combines moisture, recharge, drought and trend indicators.
Soil Moisture
136.114
Higher better
Recharge
0.91
Higher better
PDSI
2.26
Higher better
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Soil Moisture 136.114 30% weight
Scaled
Recharge 0.91 25% weight
Scaled
PDSI 2.26 20% weight
Scaled
SM Trend -18.2839 15% weight
Scaled
Precipitation 1,675.34 10% weight
Scaled
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Soil Moisture 136.819 135.409 136.114
Recharge Estimate 0.79 1.02 0.91
PDSI 2.40 2.12 2.26
Groundwater Score 67.7 56.3 58.0
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher score suggests better long-term aquifer and moisture support conditions.

🌧️ Waterlogging

↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Waterlogging?Waterlogging combines topography, imperviousness and wetness indices across nearby grid cells.
Grid Count
11
Sampled cells
Avg Susceptibility
52.9
Lower is safer
High Risk Grids
8
High / Very High
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTargetStatus
Avg Susceptibility 52.9 < 40
Concern
Avg Slope 3.32° > 1°
Good
Avg Impervious 31.7% < 70%
Good
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher susceptibility and low slope increase monsoon water stagnation probability.

🚶 Walkability & Safety

↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Walkability & Safety?OSM amenity metrics reflect pedestrian, safety and urban accessibility infrastructure.
Footpaths
0
Higher better
Street Lamps
0
Higher better
Police/Fire Access
0
Presence
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Footpaths (500m) 0 ≥ 3
Concern
Sidewalk Roads (1km) 2 ≥ 5
Concern
Nearest Police Station 2,403 m ≤ 2000m
Context
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher OSM accessibility/safety features generally improve everyday livability.

⚠️ Risk Factors

↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Risk Factors?Nearby hazards and sensitive risk points mapped around this area.
Total Risks
3
Mapped points
Scoring Breakdown
CategoryRiskDistance / SeverityMeaning
Accessibility No bus service 1308 m / Medium Area lacks regular public bus service
Environmental Roadside waste dump 2393 m / Medium Informal waste dumping near road area
Infrastructure Unpaved access road 2445 m / Low Unmaintained kachha road section
💡 What does this mean for you?Closer and severe risks can affect insurance, resale and safety comfort.

🌬️ Air Quality: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

💧 Water Quality: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🧹 Sanitation: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🛣️ Infrastructure: Infrastructure Score Formula

Formula: Composite weighted model from GHSL/ESA/VIIRS/Terrain features
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Urbanization index34.6420%SMOD
Built-up balance37.2%15%Best in moderate band
NTL stability59.7%15%Power/activity consistency
Avg building height4.92 m10%Vertical infra proxy
Impervious %22.7%10%Moderate is optimal
Radiance5.1610%Development proxy
Slope1.39°10%Flatter is better
Green support12.4%10%Tree + grass contribution
This is the same weighted structure used in Livability Infrastructure model.
Final: 51.20 / 100

🏥 Amenities: Amenity Score Breakdown

Formula: Each amenity category is capped at 100, final score is averaged across categories
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Hospitals 500m1 * 33Cap 100Health access
Schools 1km6 * 20Cap 100Education access
Markets 1km5 * 33Cap 100Daily needs
Parks 500m1 * 33Cap 100Open space
Transit 1km0 * 50Cap 100Mobility
Category multipliers mirror the Livability snapshot logic.
Final: Final from amenity_scores table

🌳 Green Cover: Green Score Formula

Formula: Score = (NDVI*40%) + (Vegetation*30%) + (Dense Green*20%) + (Parks*10%)
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
NDVI component0.351 => 70.240%28.1
Vegetation component50.1% => 50.130%15.0
Dense green component32.0% => 64.020%12.8
Parks component0 => 0.010%0.0
This matches the Livability GreenCover model weighting logic.
Final: 55.91 / 100

🔊 Noise: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🌊 Flood Risk: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🏚️ Earthquake Risk: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🌡️ Land Surface Temp: LST Score Formula

Formula: Score = ((45 - LST Mean) / 25) * 100, clipped to [0,100]
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
LST Mean28.72 °CReference20°C best, 45°C worst
Lower land surface temperature means better livability.
Final: 65.12 / 100

🏗️ Built-up Density: Built-up Score Formula

Formula: Score = 100 - Built-up %
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Built-up %32.5%InverseLower is better
Dense concrete surfaces reduce infiltration and increase heat islands.
Final: 67.54 / 100

💡 Night-time Lights: Night-time Lights Formula

Formula: Score = min(100, (Avg Radiance / 50) * 100)
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Avg Radiance7.65Scale 0-50Higher indicates activity
Higher night radiance generally tracks electrification and economic intensity.
Final: 15.30 / 100

🏞️ Water Bodies: Water Bodies Score Formula

Formula: Score = (Permanent Water Score * 70%) + (Seasonal Water Score * 30%)
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Permanent water26.07%70%Scaled against 10% benchmark
Seasonal water75.28%30%Scaled against 20% benchmark
Permanent water has higher score weight than seasonal water.
Final: 100.00 / 100

👥 Population Density: Population Density Formula

Formula: Score = ((20000 - density_per_km²) / 20000) * 100, clipped to [0,100]
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Density2,028.5 /km²Inverse scaleLower density -> higher score
This follows the Livability PopulationDensity model.
Final: 89.86 / 100

⛲ Groundwater: Groundwater Score Formula

Formula: Weighted: Soil Moisture 30% + Recharge 25% + PDSI 20% + Trend 15% + Precipitation 10%
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Soil moisture136.11430%Scaled to 0-200
Recharge estimate0.9125%Scaled -200 to +400
PDSI2.2620%Scaled -4 to +4
SM trend-18.283915%Scaled -50 to +50
Precipitation1,675.3410%Scaled 800 to 1800
Exactly reused from Livability Groundwater model logic.
Final: 57.96 / 100

🌧️ Waterlogging: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🚶 Walkability & Safety: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

⚠️ Risk Factors: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

View full livability report for Mahadev Ghat Road →

Compliance Status

RERA registration, filings, and compliance flags based on public CG-RERA records.

Compliance Status Based on public CG-RERA records
4 Passed
2 N/A
RERA Registration Active
Reg No. PCGRERA220724001797 — Status: New
Section 3 · Source · View Certificate · RERA Official Page
No RERA Orders
No complaints or orders found against this project
Sec 38–63 · Source
No Orders in Last 12 Months
Clean record — no complaints or orders filed
Source
Within Timeline
Target completion: 10 Jun 2029
Section 4 · Source
Quarterly Updates Not Available
No compliance snapshot data on record
Section 11 · Source
Annual Audit Not Available
No compliance snapshot data on record
Section 4(2)(l)(D) · Source
Each check is based on publicly available CG-RERA portal data as of Apr 2026. How this works →
Other Projects by Same Promoter (1)
ProjectRERA No.StatusDistrictType
SHIVLOK HEIGHTS PCGRERA300824001810 New Raipur Residential Development

Details

Registration, professional team, bank, promoters, and compliance history.

Registration Details
RERA Number
PCGRERA220724001797
Status
New
Project Type
Residential Development
Approved Date
22 Jul 2024
Original End Date
10 Jun 2029
EWS Category
NO
Construction Cost
₹ 492806000
Land Cost
₹ 51245000
Proposed Completion
10 Jun 2029
Authorised Person
Sunil kumar taparia
Website
www.shreekrishnabuilder.com/ongoing-project.php?proj
View on Map
Professional Team
RoleNameLicense / Membership
Statutory CA PAWAN KUMAR BAID 404855
Quarterly CA YATISH AGRAWAL 442125
Engineer RAJENDRA JAIN 330/98
Architect SHASHIKANT KUJUR CA/2018/95221
Promoters
G
GOVIND REALTY Partnership Firm

Legal Orders & Cases

RERA legal orders, complaints, and case statistics filed against this project.

Legal Orders (0)
ComplaintApplicantSectionDateSourcePDF
No orders found for this project.

Location

Project address, coordinates, and nearby places.

Location Details
Address
opposite sadafaldev ashram, mahadevghat-bhatagaon raod raipur
District
Raipur
Tehsil
Raipur
Coordinates
21.2162580, 81.5931434 View on Map
Neighborhood Intelligence

Explore nearby infrastructure around this project. Toggle categories to show/hide on the map.

Neighborhood Map 3 km radius
RERA Projects Near KRISHNA SATTVAM PHASE 01 30 found within 3 km
# Project District Status Distance
1 GOKULDHAM RESIDENCY Raipur Ongoing 0.26 km
2 admire green phase- 1 Raipur New 0.38 km
3 DREAM CITY Dhamtari New 0.40 km
4 SANTI ENCLAVE Raipur Ongoing 0.66 km
5 MANJEET SMART HOMES Raipur New 0.87 km
6 vinayak city extension-2 Raipur New 0.92 km
7 vinayak city extension-3 Raipur New 0.95 km
8 vinayak city extension-1 Raipur New 1.13 km
9 VINAYAK CITY Raipur New 1.18 km
10 PMAY OF 319 (DUS) AT BHATAGAON ,RAIPUR Raipur Ongoing 1.34 km
11 SHIVLOK HEIGHTS Raipur New 1.35 km
12 chhugani pride phase - 2 Raipur New 1.76 km
13 Vinayak Green Scape Raipur New 1.81 km
14 HARSHIT URBAN CITY Raipur New 1.86 km
15 WHITEWOOD ITALIA Raipur Ongoing 1.87 km
16 NATURAL CITY PHASE II Raipur New 1.89 km
17 ASK GRANDIOSE Raipur New 1.92 km
18 TDS-01 INDRAPRASTH PHASE -2 Raipur Ongoing 2.01 km
19 uttam city Raipur New 2.03 km
20 chandra town Raipur Ongoing 2.05 km
21 gt uni homes phase-2 Raipur New 2.19 km
22 GT UNI HOMES Raipur New 2.19 km
23 wallfort heights phase -2 ( g,h,i,j,K,L ) Raipur New 2.24 km
24 PMAY OF 290 (dus) AT BHATAGAON ,RAIPUR Raipur Ongoing 2.24 km
25 pragati pearl Raipur Ongoing 2.29 km
26 NATURAL CITY Raipur Ongoing 2.30 km
27 wallfort heightS phase iii Raipur New 2.31 km
28 ask business triangle (abt) Raipur New 2.43 km
29 ASK PARADISE Raipur Ongoing 2.49 km
30 ZENITH RESIDENCY Durg Ongoing 2.70 km

Buyer Checklist

Documents and verifications a buyer should review before purchase.

Buyer Document Verification Checklist

Key documents a buyer should verify before purchasing in this project. Items marked Available have data on Seemankan.

12/14 verified
  • RERA Registration Certificate Available
    Confirms the project is registered with RERA CG. Verify registration number, validity dates, and project details on the RERA portal.
    RERA No: PCGRERA220724001797
    View Certificate View on RERA Portal
  • Promoter Registration Certificate Available
    Builder / colonizer company registration certificate. Confirms the promoter entity is a registered firm, company, or society.
    Preview Preview
  • Approved Building / Sanction Plan Available
    Building plan sanctioned by the local authority. Verify floor count, setbacks, and FSI compliance.
    Preview Preview
  • Layout Plan Available
    Approved layout showing plot divisions, roads, open spaces, and common areas.
    Preview
  • Title Deed / Ownership Proof Available
    Proof that the promoter legally owns the land. Verify via Sub-Registrar records.
    Preview
  • Encumbrance Certificate Available
    Confirms the property is free from legal dues, mortgages, or liens. Obtain from Sub-Registrar office.
    Preview
  • Land Use / Diversion Certificate Available
    Required if land was converted from agricultural to non-agricultural use.
    Preview
  • Architect Certificate Available
    Certification from a registered architect confirming structural plans and compliance.
    View View View +8 more
  • Structural Engineer Certificate Available
    Certification from a structural engineer confirming building safety and load-bearing capacity.
    View View View +8 more
  • CA Financial Certificate Available
    Chartered Accountant certificate on financial status, project cost estimates, and fund utilization.
    Preview View View +5 more
  • Commencement Certificate Verify Independently
    Permission to begin construction issued by the local authority after plan approval.
  • NOCs (No Objection Certificates) Available
    NOCs from fire department, environment, water supply, electricity board, and other authorities.
    View
  • Project Brochure / Specification Available
    Official brochure with unit types, amenities, and specifications. Compare with actual delivery.
    View View View +5 more
  • RERA Compliance Orders Verify Independently
    Check if any orders, penalties, or directions have been issued against this project by RERA.
Disclaimer: This checklist is for informational purposes only. "Available" means Seemankan has a copy from the RERA portal — it does not constitute legal verification. Always verify original documents with the concerned authorities and consult a legal advisor before making a purchase decision.

Risk Zone Within 5 km

Buffer zones (water bodies, airport restrictions) and risk sites (landfills, waste processing) detected within 3 km (immediate) and 5 km (extended) of the project.

12
Risk zones (within 5 km)
3 km: 3 3–5 km: 9
9
Water bodies (river/nala/lake)
3 km: 3 3–5 km: 6
3
Landfill / waste sites
3 km: 0 3–5 km: 3
0
Airport buffer overlap
3 km: 0 3–5 km: 0
Risk Zone Map (3 km & 5 km rings) Project marker centered
Water Bodies (9)
  • Urla Talab ≤3 km
    Tank · 50m buffer
    1.01 km
  • Gudhiyari Nala ≤3 km
    Nala · 20m buffer
    1.75 km
  • Kharun Right Bank Canal ≤3 km
    Canal · 20m buffer
    2.32 km
  • Mathpurena Wetland 3–5 km
    Wetland · 75m buffer
    3.31 km
  • Dumartarai Reservoir 3–5 km
    Reservoir · 75m buffer
    3.4 km
  • Bhatagaon Nala 3–5 km
    Nala · 20m buffer
    3.69 km
  • Budha Talab (Vivekananda Sarovar) 3–5 km
    Lake · 50m buffer
    4.49 km
  • Devpuri Nala 3–5 km
    Nala · 20m buffer
    4.83 km
Landfill / Waste Sites (3)
  • Old Raipur Trenching Ground 3–5 km
    Inactive landfill · 500m buffer
    3.81 km
  • Bhanpuri-Rawabhata Legacy Dump 3–5 km
    Legacy dump · 500m buffer
    4.02 km
  • Gudhiyari Old Dump Site 3–5 km
    Legacy dump · 500m buffer
    4.87 km

Reviews

Verified buyer reviews and ratings for this project.

No reviews yet. Be the first to review this project!

Login to Write a Review

You need to be signed in to submit a review for this project.

Login or Register