Home / RERA Projects / CITY HEART KAILASHPURI
ONGOING Residential Development RERA Page Project Website
GENERATE REPORT

CITY HEART KAILASHPURI

Compliance Status
Partial Compliance
21.2282, 81.6338 Explore area
District
Raipur
Area
—
Promoter
M/S FRIENDS CONSTRUCTION
Project Information
Promoter M/S FRIENDS CONSTRUCTION
Type Residential Development
Status Ongoing
Completion 31 Mar 2019
RERA No. PCGRERA291018000831
Registered 29 Oct 2018
Original End 31 Mar 2019
EWS Category NO
Authorised Person NILESH AGRAWAL
Address KAILASH VIHAR, KAILASHPURI, RAIPUR (C.G.)
At a Glance
-
Total Units
-
Units Sold
-
Unsold
3
Legal Cases
Mar 2019
Target Completion
100%
Completion
Project Professionals
CA LALIT KUMAR JAIN
STATUTORY CA
Project Analysis

360° Project Intelligence

Comprehensive analysis across regulatory, livability, market, filing activity, and market readiness dimensions.

Regulatory
71
10 of 14 checks · Moderate Signals
Livability
51
Mathpara · Moderate Signals
Legal
3
3 legal order(s) · 30 nearby
Filing Activity
78
72 docs · 6 quarterly updates
Market Readiness
35
Ongoing · due Mar 2019
Area Livability

Livability of Mathpara

Eighteen environmental, infrastructure and amenity parameters for the nearest mapped area (Mathpara — 0.24 km from this project). Click any parameter for the underlying readings, thresholds and what they mean.



🏠 Livability Parameters

Latest readings for Mathpara. Only parameters with available data are shown below. Based on the latest readings for Mathpara.

C
Composite Score
51.3 /100
Average

🌬️ Air Quality

Final Score: 92.4/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Air Quality?AQI summarizes PM2.5, PM10 and gases. Lower pollution values improve public health outcomes.
AQI
69
Satisfactory
PM2.5
21.3 µg/m³
≤ 40
PM10
74.3 µg/m³
≤ 60
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
PM2.5 21.3 µg/m³ ≤ 40
Good
PM10 74.3 µg/m³ ≤ 60
Concern
NO₂ 25.8 µg/m³ ≤ 40
Good
💡 What does this mean for you?Cleaner air lowers respiratory burden and improves outdoor comfort.

🛣️ Infrastructure

Final Score: 80.5/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Infrastructure?Infrastructure score combines land use, urbanization, built form, night lights and terrain indicators.
Built-up
71.3%
Balanced band
Tree Cover
10.8%
≥ 15%
Urbanization
99.9
Higher better
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Built-up (LULC) 71.3% 40-70%
Contextual
Impervious Surface 41.0% < 70%
Good
NDVI Mean 0.230 > 0.3
Concern
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Built-up (LULC) % 64.7% 77.8% 71.3%
Tree Cover % 12.8% 8.8% 10.8%
Urbanization Index 100.0 99.9 99.9
Infra Score 81.8 79.1 81.6
💡 What does this mean for you?Balanced built + green mix usually improves long-term livability resilience.

🏥 Amenities

Final Score: 64.8/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Amenities?Amenity score captures daily-access services in walk/short-drive radii.
Hospitals 500m
0
Target ≥1
Schools 1km
9
Target ≥3
Parks 500m
0
Target ≥1
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Hospitals (500m) 0 ≥1
Concern
Schools (1km) 9 ≥3
Good
Markets (1km) 1 ≥1
Good
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher local amenity density improves convenience and walkability.

🌳 Green Cover

Final Score: 20.1/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Green Cover?NDVI and vegetation structure are measured from satellite imagery to estimate neighborhood greenery.
NDVI Mean
0.162
Greenness index
Vegetation
12.5%
% green pixels
Dense Green
5.2%
Thick canopy
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
NDVI Mean 0.162 0.5 maps to score 100
Weighted 40%
Vegetation % 12.5% Direct % (cap 100)
Weighted 30%
Dense Green % 5.2% Scaled from 50%
Weighted 20%
Parks within 500m 0 Count * 33 (cap 100)
Weighted 10%
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
NDVI Mean 0.160 0.164 0.162
Vegetation % 11.9% 13.2% 12.5%
Dense Green % 2.9% 7.6% 5.2%
Tree Canopy % 9.5% 9.2% 9.4%
Green Score 17.5 20.1 18.8
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher green metrics typically reduce heat stress and improve comfort.

🌊 Flood Risk

Final Score: 40.0/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Flood Risk?Flood risk combines river exposure and local waterlogging vulnerability.
Overall Risk
Medium
Lower is safer
River Risk
Medium
Lower is safer
Waterlogging
Medium
Lower is safer
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Overall Risk Medium Low preferred
Info
River Flood Risk Medium Low preferred
Info
Waterlogging Risk Medium Low preferred
Info
💡 What does this mean for you?Lower flood risk means less disruption and lower hazard exposure.

🏚️ Earthquake Risk

Final Score: 10.0/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Earthquake Risk?Earthquake profile uses seismic zone, PGA and soil/liquefaction risk factors.
Seismic Zone
Zone II
Lower risk zone preferred
Risk Level
Low
Low preferred
Liquefaction
None
Low preferred
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Seismic Zone Zone II II preferred
Info
Risk Level Low Low preferred
Info
PGA (475yr) 0.0155g Lower preferred
Info
💡 What does this mean for you?Lower seismic hazard reduces structural and insurance risk exposure.

🌡️ Land Surface Temp

Final Score: 57.4/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Land Surface Temp?Land Surface Temperature reflects heat-island intensity from satellite thermal bands.
LST Mean
30.7°C
Lower better
LST Min
23.3°C
Context
LST Max
39.4°C
Lower better
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
LST Mean 30.7°C 20°C best / 45°C worst
Weighted by formula
LST Score 57.4 0-100
Computed
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
LST Mean (°C) 30.3 31.0 30.7
LST Min (°C) 23.5 23.0 23.3
LST Max (°C) 38.8 40.0 39.4
LST Score 58.7 56.0 57.4
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher heat exposure affects comfort, cooling load and health risk.

🏗️ Built-up Density

Final Score: 28.7/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Built-up Density?Built-up density measures extent of developed surface versus open space.
Built-up %
71.3%
Lower better
Open Space %
28.7%
Higher better
Built-up Score
28.7
0-100
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Built-up % 71.3% Inverse scoring
Score = 100 - builtup%
Open Space % 28.7% Context
Info
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Built-up % 64.7% 77.8% 71.3%
Open Space % 35.3% 22.2% 28.7%
Built-up Score 35.3 22.2 28.7
💡 What does this mean for you?Very high built-up often raises heat and runoff while reducing open environmental buffers.

💡 Night-time Lights

Final Score: 65.1/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Night-time Lights?Nighttime lights are a proxy for economic activity and electrification intensity.
Avg Radiance
32.54
Higher better
Max Radiance
51.03
Context
NTL Score
65.1
0-100
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Avg Radiance 32.54 Scaled to 50
Score = min(100, avg/50*100)
NTL Score 65.1 0-100
Computed
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Avg Radiance 33.52 31.56 32.54
Max Radiance 52.68 49.37 51.03
NTL Score 67.1 63.1 65.1
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher radiance often indicates stronger urban activity but can correlate with light pollution.

🏞️ Water Bodies

Final Score: 100.0/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Water Bodies?Water-bodies score reflects permanent and seasonal water presence in the analysis radius.
Permanent Water
68.67%
Higher generally better
Seasonal Water
97.97%
Context
Water Score
100.0
0-100
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Permanent Water % 68.67% 70% weight
Scaled against 10%
Seasonal Water % 97.97% 30% weight
Scaled against 20%
Water Score 100.0 0-100
Computed
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Permanent Water % 70.93% 66.40% 68.67%
Seasonal Water % 98.17% 97.77% 97.97%
Water Score 100.0 100.0 100.0
💡 What does this mean for you?Water presence can support cooling, recharge and ecological quality.

👥 Population Density

Final Score: 64.9/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Population Density?Population density indicates urban crowding pressure around the area.
Population
117,678
Estimated residents
Density/km²
7,015.0
Lower better for this score
Score
64.9
0-100
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Density/km² 7,015.0 Inverse scale up to 20,000
Lower -> higher score
Score 64.9 0-100
Computed
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Population Total 20,166 215,189 117,678
Density / km² 6,419.1 7,610.8 7,015.0
Pop Density Score 67.9 62.0 64.9
💡 What does this mean for you?Extremely high density can increase pressure on services and mobility.

⛲ Groundwater

Final Score: 63.3/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Groundwater?Groundwater score combines moisture, recharge, drought and trend indicators.
Soil Moisture
133.645
Higher better
Recharge
0.05
Higher better
PDSI
2.96
Higher better
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Soil Moisture 133.645 30% weight
Scaled
Recharge 0.05 25% weight
Scaled
PDSI 2.96 20% weight
Scaled
SM Trend 0.0000 15% weight
Scaled
Precipitation 1,875.46 10% weight
Scaled
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Soil Moisture 133.892 133.399 133.645
Recharge Estimate -0.20 0.31 0.05
PDSI 2.97 2.96 2.96
Groundwater Score 63.3 63.3 63.3
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher score suggests better long-term aquifer and moisture support conditions.

🌧️ Waterlogging

↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Waterlogging?Waterlogging combines topography, imperviousness and wetness indices across nearby grid cells.
Grid Count
2
Sampled cells
Avg Susceptibility
52.2
Lower is safer
High Risk Grids
2
High / Very High
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTargetStatus
Avg Susceptibility 52.2 < 40
Concern
Avg Slope 2.57° > 1°
Good
Avg Impervious 70.6% < 70%
Concern
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher susceptibility and low slope increase monsoon water stagnation probability.

🚶 Walkability & Safety

↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Walkability & Safety?OSM amenity metrics reflect pedestrian, safety and urban accessibility infrastructure.
Footpaths
0
Higher better
Street Lamps
0
Higher better
Police/Fire Access
0
Presence
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Footpaths (500m) 0 ≥ 3
Concern
Sidewalk Roads (1km) 0 ≥ 5
Concern
Nearest Police Station — m ≤ 2000m
Context
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher OSM accessibility/safety features generally improve everyday livability.

🌬️ Air Quality: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🛣️ Infrastructure: Infrastructure Score Formula

Formula: Composite weighted model from GHSL/ESA/VIIRS/Terrain features
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Urbanization index99.9420%SMOD
Built-up balance71.3%15%Best in moderate band
NTL stability69.0%15%Power/activity consistency
Avg building height8.33 m10%Vertical infra proxy
Impervious %41.0%10%Moderate is optimal
Radiance32.9710%Development proxy
Slope0.10°10%Flatter is better
Green support10.8%10%Tree + grass contribution
This is the same weighted structure used in Livability Infrastructure model.
Final: 81.55 / 100

🏥 Amenities: Amenity Score Breakdown

Formula: Each amenity category is capped at 100, final score is averaged across categories
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Hospitals 500m0 * 33Cap 100Health access
Schools 1km9 * 20Cap 100Education access
Markets 1km1 * 33Cap 100Daily needs
Parks 500m0 * 33Cap 100Open space
Transit 1km0 * 50Cap 100Mobility
Category multipliers mirror the Livability snapshot logic.
Final: Final from amenity_scores table

🌳 Green Cover: Green Score Formula

Formula: Score = (NDVI*40%) + (Vegetation*30%) + (Dense Green*20%) + (Parks*10%)
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
NDVI component0.162 => 32.440%13.0
Vegetation component12.5% => 12.530%3.8
Dense green component5.2% => 10.420%2.1
Parks component0 => 0.010%0.0
This matches the Livability GreenCover model weighting logic.
Final: 18.81 / 100

🌊 Flood Risk: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🏚️ Earthquake Risk: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🌡️ Land Surface Temp: LST Score Formula

Formula: Score = ((45 - LST Mean) / 25) * 100, clipped to [0,100]
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
LST Mean30.66 °CReference20°C best, 45°C worst
Lower land surface temperature means better livability.
Final: 57.36 / 100

🏗️ Built-up Density: Built-up Score Formula

Formula: Score = 100 - Built-up %
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Built-up %71.3%InverseLower is better
Dense concrete surfaces reduce infiltration and increase heat islands.
Final: 28.74 / 100

💡 Night-time Lights: Night-time Lights Formula

Formula: Score = min(100, (Avg Radiance / 50) * 100)
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Avg Radiance32.54Scale 0-50Higher indicates activity
Higher night radiance generally tracks electrification and economic intensity.
Final: 65.08 / 100

🏞️ Water Bodies: Water Bodies Score Formula

Formula: Score = (Permanent Water Score * 70%) + (Seasonal Water Score * 30%)
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Permanent water68.67%70%Scaled against 10% benchmark
Seasonal water97.97%30%Scaled against 20% benchmark
Permanent water has higher score weight than seasonal water.
Final: 100.00 / 100

👥 Population Density: Population Density Formula

Formula: Score = ((20000 - density_per_km²) / 20000) * 100, clipped to [0,100]
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Density7,015.0 /km²Inverse scaleLower density -> higher score
This follows the Livability PopulationDensity model.
Final: 64.93 / 100

⛲ Groundwater: Groundwater Score Formula

Formula: Weighted: Soil Moisture 30% + Recharge 25% + PDSI 20% + Trend 15% + Precipitation 10%
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Soil moisture133.64530%Scaled to 0-200
Recharge estimate0.0525%Scaled -200 to +400
PDSI2.9620%Scaled -4 to +4
SM trend0.000015%Scaled -50 to +50
Precipitation1,875.4610%Scaled 800 to 1800
Exactly reused from Livability Groundwater model logic.
Final: 63.29 / 100

🌧️ Waterlogging: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🚶 Walkability & Safety: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

View full livability report for Mathpara →

Compliance Status

RERA registration, filings, and compliance flags based on public CG-RERA records.

Compliance Status Based on public CG-RERA records
3 Passed
1 Issue(s)
2 N/A
RERA Registration Active
Reg No. PCGRERA291018000831 — Status: Ongoing
Section 3 · Source · View Certificate · RERA Official Page
No Penalty Orders
3 order(s) on record, none with penalty sections (Sec 38/39/40/59/61/63)
Sec 38–63 · Source
No Recent Orders
No orders filed in the last 12 months (older: 3)
Source
Completion Overdue
Was due 31 Mar 2019 — overdue by ~86 month(s)
Section 4 · Source
Quarterly Updates Not Available
No compliance snapshot data on record
Section 11 · Source
Annual Audit Not Available
No compliance snapshot data on record
Section 4(2)(l)(D) · Source
Each check is based on publicly available CG-RERA portal data as of Apr 2026. How this works →

Details

Registration, professional team, bank, promoters, and compliance history.

Registration Details
RERA Number
PCGRERA291018000831
Status
Ongoing
Project Type
Residential Development
Approved Date
29 Oct 2018
Original End Date
31 Mar 2019
EWS Category
NO
Proposed Completion
31 Mar 2019
Authorised Person
NILESH AGRAWAL
View on Map
Professional Team
RoleNameLicense / Membership
Statutory CA CA LALIT KUMAR JAIN 075192
Promoters
M
M/S FRIENDS CONSTRUCTION
K
KAILASH VIHAR RESIDENTIAL COOPERATIVE SOCIETY MARYADIT
F
FRIENDS CONSTRUCTION
F
FRIENDS CONSTRUCTION Proprietorship Firm

Legal Orders & Cases

RERA legal orders, complaints, and case statistics filed against this project.

3
Total Cases
0
Last 12 Months
3
Older Cases
3
PDFs Available
Legal Orders (3)
ComplaintApplicantSectionDateSourcePDF
M-PRO-2024-02344 KAILASH VIHAR RESIDENTIAL CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY MARWADIT Section 11,Section 17 07 Aug 2024 This project
M-PRO-2024-02137 NILESH AGRAWAL - 28 Jun 2024 This project
M-COM-2019-00639 CG-RERA - 29 May 2019 This project

Location

Project address, coordinates, and nearby places.

Location Details
Address
KAILASH VIHAR, KAILASHPURI, RAIPUR (C.G.)
District
Raipur
Tehsil
Raipur
Coordinates
21.2281563, 81.6338474 View on Map
Neighborhood Intelligence

Explore nearby infrastructure around this project. Toggle categories to show/hide on the map.

Neighborhood Map 3 km radius
RERA Projects Near CITY HEART KAILASHPURI 30 found within 3 km
# Project District Status Distance
1 sumeet busIness park Raipur Ongoing 1.34 km
2 GULZAR HOMES Raipur Ongoing 1.37 km
3 sumeet trade center (commercial) sumeet residency(residential) Raipur New 1.47 km
4 simran squre Raipur Ongoing 1.65 km
5 CENTRUM Raipur Ongoing 1.67 km
6 FORUM BUSINESS CENTRE Raipur New 1.68 km
7 AVINASH NEOPOLIS PHASE-1 Raipur New 1.80 km
8 PMAY OF 58 DUS AT NEAR DKS PARISAR ,RAIPUR Raipur Ongoing 1.80 km
9 METROPOLIS Raipur Ongoing 1.86 km
10 BAJAJ SKY HEIGHTS Raipur New 1.95 km
11 ASK PARADISE Raipur Ongoing 1.96 km
12 SHIVA RESIDENCY PHASE - III Raipur Ongoing 2.01 km
13 SHIVA RESIDENCY PHASE - A-1 Raipur Ongoing 2.04 km
14 ask business triangle (abt) Raipur New 2.04 km
15 ANAND ARCADE Raipur Ongoing 2.06 km
16 WISDOM RESIDENCY Raipur Ongoing 2.11 km
17 ABHINANDAN TOWER Raipur Ongoing 2.14 km
18 aviva green city Raipur Ongoing 2.27 km
19 ASHOKA ROYAL A&B Raipur Ongoing 2.27 km
20 chandra planet Raipur Ongoing 2.29 km
21 UNIQUE PARADISE PHASE -2 Raipur New 2.30 km
22 wallfort heightS phase iii Raipur New 2.30 km
23 UNIQUE PARADISE PHASE -2 EXTENSION Raipur New 2.32 km
24 river county - 08 Raipur Ongoing 2.34 km
25 river county - 05 Raipur Ongoing 2.35 km
26 river county - 06 Raipur Ongoing 2.35 km
27 river county - 07 Raipur Ongoing 2.37 km
28 river county - 03 Raipur Ongoing 2.38 km
29 river county - 02 Raipur Ongoing 2.38 km
30 river county - 04 Raipur Ongoing 2.38 km

Buyer Checklist

Documents and verifications a buyer should review before purchase.

Buyer Document Verification Checklist

Key documents a buyer should verify before purchasing in this project. Items marked Available have data on Seemankan.

11/14 verified
  • RERA Registration Certificate Available
    Confirms the project is registered with RERA CG. Verify registration number, validity dates, and project details on the RERA portal.
    RERA No: PCGRERA291018000831
    View Certificate View on RERA Portal
  • Promoter Registration Certificate Available
    Builder / colonizer company registration certificate. Confirms the promoter entity is a registered firm, company, or society.
    Preview Preview
  • Approved Building / Sanction Plan Verify Independently
    Building plan sanctioned by the local authority. Verify floor count, setbacks, and FSI compliance.
  • Layout Plan Available
    Approved layout showing plot divisions, roads, open spaces, and common areas.
    Preview
  • Title Deed / Ownership Proof Available
    Proof that the promoter legally owns the land. Verify via Sub-Registrar records.
    Preview
  • Encumbrance Certificate Available
    Confirms the property is free from legal dues, mortgages, or liens. Obtain from Sub-Registrar office.
    Preview
  • Land Use / Diversion Certificate Verify Independently
    Required if land was converted from agricultural to non-agricultural use.
  • Architect Certificate Available
    Certification from a registered architect confirming structural plans and compliance.
    View View View
  • Structural Engineer Certificate Available
    Certification from a structural engineer confirming building safety and load-bearing capacity.
    View View View
  • CA Financial Certificate Available
    Chartered Accountant certificate on financial status, project cost estimates, and fund utilization.
    Preview View View +1 more
  • Commencement Certificate Available
    Permission to begin construction issued by the local authority after plan approval.
    Download Download Download +1 more
  • NOCs (No Objection Certificates) Verify Independently
    NOCs from fire department, environment, water supply, electricity board, and other authorities.
  • Project Brochure / Specification Available
    Official brochure with unit types, amenities, and specifications. Compare with actual delivery.
    View View View +2 more
  • RERA Compliance Orders Available
    Check if any orders, penalties, or directions have been issued against this project by RERA.
    3 order(s) on record — review in Legal tab
Disclaimer: This checklist is for informational purposes only. "Available" means Seemankan has a copy from the RERA portal — it does not constitute legal verification. Always verify original documents with the concerned authorities and consult a legal advisor before making a purchase decision.

Risk Zone Within 5 km

Buffer zones (water bodies, airport restrictions) and risk sites (landfills, waste processing) detected within 3 km (immediate) and 5 km (extended) of the project.

23
Risk zones (within 5 km)
3 km: 14 3–5 km: 9
23
Water bodies (river/nala/lake)
3 km: 14 3–5 km: 9
0
Landfill / waste sites
3 km: 0 3–5 km: 0
0
Airport buffer overlap
3 km: 0 3–5 km: 0
Risk Zone Map (3 km & 5 km rings) Project marker centered
Water Bodies (23)
  • Budha Talab (Vivekananda Sarovar) ≤3 km
    Lake · 50m buffer
    0.44 km
  • Pandri Nala ≤3 km
    Nala · 20m buffer
    0.88 km
  • Pandri Talab ≤3 km
    Tank · 50m buffer
    1.05 km
  • Mathpurena Wetland ≤3 km
    Wetland · 75m buffer
    1.45 km
  • Shankar Nagar Nala ≤3 km
    Nala · 20m buffer
    1.6 km
  • Amanaka Talab ≤3 km
    Tank · 50m buffer
    1.67 km
  • Bhatagaon Nala ≤3 km
    Nala · 20m buffer
    1.8 km
  • Kankali Talab ≤3 km
    Tank · 50m buffer
    2.1 km

Reviews

Verified buyer reviews and ratings for this project.

No reviews yet. Be the first to review this project!

Login to Write a Review

You need to be signed in to submit a review for this project.

Login or Register