RealEstateIQTM
IN हिन्दी
Login Sign Up Free
Want a full project intelligence report? Download a detailed PDF report — RERA compliance, promoter, financials, amenities, location & risk.
Generate Project Report
Home / RERA Projects / ORION
ONGOING Residential Development RERA Page Project Website
GENERATE REPORT

ORION

Compliance Status
Partial Compliance
21.2602, 81.6238 Explore area
District
Raipur
Area
—
Promoter
MANAKSHYA BUILDERS & DEVELOPERS
Project Information
Promoter MANAKSHYA BUILDERS & DEVELOPERS
Type Residential Development
Status Ongoing
Completion 30 Jun 2023
RERA No. PCGRERA121218000868
Registered 12 Dec 2018
Original End 30 Sep 2022
Total Units 48 · 2 sold
EWS Category NO
Construction Cost ₹ 279492000
Land Cost ₹ 71310000
Authorised Person ANIL AGRAWAL
Address VILLAGE - GUDHIYARI, RAIPUR (C.G.)
At a Glance
48
Total Units
2
Units Sold
46
Unsold
2
Legal Cases
Jun 2023
Target Completion
26%
Completion
Amenities & Facilities (14)
BOUNDARY WALL
0%
ENERGY MAANAGEMENT
0%
FIRE PROTECTION AND FIRE SAFETY REQUIREMENTS
0%
INTERNAL ROADS AND FOOTPATHS
0%
LANDSCAPING AND TREE PLANTING
0%
OPEN PARKING
0%
SECURITY SERVICE
0%
SEWERAGE
0%
SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT AND DISPOSAL
0%
STORM WATER DRAINS
0%
STREET LIGHTING
0%
TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL OF SEWERAGE AND SULLAGE WAT
0%
WATER CONSERVATION RAIN WATER HARVESTING
0%
WATER SUPPLY
0%
Project Professionals
PRIYAL AGRAWAL
STATUTORY CA
AKARSH AGRAWAL
QUARTERLY CA
PRASHANT RAHANGDALE
ENGINEER
AR.ANURAG HARDEL
ARCHITECT
Project Analysis

360° Project Intelligence

Comprehensive analysis across regulatory, livability, market, filing activity, and market readiness dimensions.

Regulatory
79
11 of 14 checks · Moderate Signals
Livability
60
Indra Nagar · Moderate Signals
Legal
2
2 legal order(s) · 25 nearby
Filing Activity
149
125 docs · 24 quarterly updates
Market Readiness
4
Ongoing · due Jun 2023
Area Livability

Livability of Indra Nagar

Eighteen environmental, infrastructure and amenity parameters for the nearest mapped area (Indra Nagar — 0.45 km from this project). Click any parameter for the underlying readings, thresholds and what they mean.



🏠 Livability Parameters

Latest readings for Indra Nagar. Only parameters with available data are shown below. Based on the latest readings for Indra Nagar.

B
Composite Score
60.5 /100
Good

🌬️ Air Quality

Final Score: 98.0/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Air Quality?AQI summarizes PM2.5, PM10 and gases. Lower pollution values improve public health outcomes.
AQI
55
Satisfactory
PM2.5
22.7 µg/m³
≤ 40
PM10
69.9 µg/m³
≤ 60
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
PM2.5 22.7 µg/m³ ≤ 40
Good
PM10 69.9 µg/m³ ≤ 60
Concern
NO₂ 34.9 µg/m³ ≤ 40
Good
💡 What does this mean for you?Cleaner air lowers respiratory burden and improves outdoor comfort.

💧 Water Quality

Final Score: 74.5/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Water Quality?Water quality combines chemistry, supply duration and contamination markers.
TDS
295 ppm
≤ 500
pH
7.47
6.5–8.5
Supply
7.1 hr/day
≥ 8 hr
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
TDS 295 ppm ≤ 500
Good
Fluoride 0.72 mg/L ≤ 1.0
Good
Turbidity 2.4 NTU ≤ 1
Concern
💡 What does this mean for you?Better supply quality and consistency reduces dependence on tanker/groundwater fallback.

🧹 Sanitation

Final Score: 58.2/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Sanitation?Sanitation reflects ODF status, sewage treatment and waste management regularity.
ODF
ODF+
ODF++
Sewage Coverage
44%
≥ 80%
Drainage
56%
≥ 90%
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
ODF Status ODF+ ODF++
Info
Sewage Coverage 44% ≥ 80%
Concern
Drainage Coverage 56% ≥ 90%
Concern
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher sanitation maturity lowers disease exposure and neighborhood nuisance.

🛣️ Infrastructure

Final Score: 78.6/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Infrastructure?Infrastructure score combines land use, urbanization, built form, night lights and terrain indicators.
Built-up
77.5%
Balanced band
Tree Cover
12.8%
≥ 15%
Urbanization
100.0
Higher better
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Built-up (LULC) 77.5% 40-70%
Contextual
Impervious Surface 54.2% < 70%
Good
NDVI Mean 0.220 > 0.3
Concern
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Built-up (LULC) % 85.7% 69.4% 77.5%
Tree Cover % 11.6% 13.9% 12.8%
Urbanization Index 100.0 100.0 100.0
Infra Score 76.2 80.9 78.6
💡 What does this mean for you?Balanced built + green mix usually improves long-term livability resilience.

🏥 Amenities

Final Score: 89.1/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Amenities?Amenity score captures daily-access services in walk/short-drive radii.
Hospitals 500m
0
Target ≥1
Schools 1km
4
Target ≥3
Parks 500m
4
Target ≥1
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Hospitals (500m) 0 ≥1
Concern
Schools (1km) 4 ≥3
Good
Markets (1km) 5 ≥1
Good
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher local amenity density improves convenience and walkability.

🌳 Green Cover

Final Score: 46.8/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Green Cover?NDVI and vegetation structure are measured from satellite imagery to estimate neighborhood greenery.
NDVI Mean
0.255
Greenness index
Vegetation
25.8%
% green pixels
Dense Green
11.1%
Thick canopy
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
NDVI Mean 0.255 0.5 maps to score 100
Weighted 40%
Vegetation % 25.8% Direct % (cap 100)
Weighted 30%
Dense Green % 11.1% Scaled from 50%
Weighted 20%
Parks within 500m 4 Count * 33 (cap 100)
Weighted 10%
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
NDVI Mean 0.241 0.269 0.255
Vegetation % 19.3% 32.4% 25.8%
Dense Green % 8.4% 13.8% 11.1%
Tree Canopy % 19.9% 20.9% 20.4%
Green Score 38.4 46.8 42.6
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher green metrics typically reduce heat stress and improve comfort.

🔊 Noise

Final Score: 46.9/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Noise?Noise uses measured day/night dB compared to CPCB zone limits.
Day dB
53.7
vs CPCB day limit
Night dB
48.0
vs CPCB night limit
Zone
CPCB class
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Day Noise 53.7 dB ≤ 65.0 dB
Good
Night Noise 48.0 dB ≤ 55.0 dB
Good
Nearest Highway 1,004 m Higher usually quieter
Info
💡 What does this mean for you?Chronic high noise impacts stress, sleep quality and perceived comfort.

🌊 Flood Risk

Final Score: 40.0/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Flood Risk?Flood risk combines river exposure and local waterlogging vulnerability.
Overall Risk
Medium
Lower is safer
River Risk
Medium
Lower is safer
Waterlogging
Medium
Lower is safer
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Overall Risk Medium Low preferred
Info
River Flood Risk Medium Low preferred
Info
Waterlogging Risk Medium Low preferred
Info
💡 What does this mean for you?Lower flood risk means less disruption and lower hazard exposure.

🏚️ Earthquake Risk

Final Score: 10.0/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Earthquake Risk?Earthquake profile uses seismic zone, PGA and soil/liquefaction risk factors.
Seismic Zone
Zone II
Lower risk zone preferred
Risk Level
Low
Low preferred
Liquefaction
None
Low preferred
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Seismic Zone Zone II II preferred
Info
Risk Level Low Low preferred
Info
PGA (475yr) 0.0155g Lower preferred
Info
💡 What does this mean for you?Lower seismic hazard reduces structural and insurance risk exposure.

🌡️ Land Surface Temp

Final Score: 52.5/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Land Surface Temp?Land Surface Temperature reflects heat-island intensity from satellite thermal bands.
LST Mean
31.9°C
Lower better
LST Min
24.8°C
Context
LST Max
40.6°C
Lower better
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
LST Mean 31.9°C 20°C best / 45°C worst
Weighted by formula
LST Score 52.5 0-100
Computed
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
LST Mean (°C) 32.6 31.1 31.9
LST Min (°C) 27.1 22.6 24.8
LST Max (°C) 41.1 40.1 40.6
LST Score 49.6 55.4 52.5
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher heat exposure affects comfort, cooling load and health risk.

🏗️ Built-up Density

Final Score: 22.5/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Built-up Density?Built-up density measures extent of developed surface versus open space.
Built-up %
77.5%
Lower better
Open Space %
22.5%
Higher better
Built-up Score
22.5
0-100
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Built-up % 77.5% Inverse scoring
Score = 100 - builtup%
Open Space % 22.5% Context
Info
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Built-up % 85.7% 69.4% 77.5%
Open Space % 14.3% 30.6% 22.5%
Built-up Score 14.3 30.6 22.5
💡 What does this mean for you?Very high built-up often raises heat and runoff while reducing open environmental buffers.

💡 Night-time Lights

Final Score: 61.5/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Night-time Lights?Nighttime lights are a proxy for economic activity and electrification intensity.
Avg Radiance
30.75
Higher better
Max Radiance
48.41
Context
NTL Score
61.5
0-100
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Avg Radiance 30.75 Scaled to 50
Score = min(100, avg/50*100)
NTL Score 61.5 0-100
Computed
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Avg Radiance 34.74 26.77 30.75
Max Radiance 55.01 41.80 48.41
NTL Score 69.5 53.5 61.5
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher radiance often indicates stronger urban activity but can correlate with light pollution.

🏞️ Water Bodies

Final Score: 100.0/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Water Bodies?Water-bodies score reflects permanent and seasonal water presence in the analysis radius.
Permanent Water
37.96%
Higher generally better
Seasonal Water
94.21%
Context
Water Score
100.0
0-100
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Permanent Water % 37.96% 70% weight
Scaled against 10%
Seasonal Water % 94.21% 30% weight
Scaled against 20%
Water Score 100.0 0-100
Computed
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Permanent Water % 10.93% 64.99% 37.96%
Seasonal Water % 92.10% 96.31% 94.21%
Water Score 100.0 100.0 100.0
💡 What does this mean for you?Water presence can support cooling, recharge and ecological quality.

👥 Population Density

Final Score: 58.7/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Population Density?Population density indicates urban crowding pressure around the area.
Population
115,807
Estimated residents
Density/km²
8,267.5
Lower better for this score
Score
58.7
0-100
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Density/km² 8,267.5 Inverse scale up to 20,000
Lower -> higher score
Score 58.7 0-100
Computed
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Population Total 29,488 202,125 115,807
Density / km² 9,386.3 7,148.7 8,267.5
Pop Density Score 53.1 64.3 58.7
💡 What does this mean for you?Extremely high density can increase pressure on services and mobility.

⛲ Groundwater

Final Score: 63.5/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Groundwater?Groundwater score combines moisture, recharge, drought and trend indicators.
Soil Moisture
132.759
Higher better
Recharge
1.54
Higher better
PDSI
3.05
Higher better
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Soil Moisture 132.759 30% weight
Scaled
Recharge 1.54 25% weight
Scaled
PDSI 3.05 20% weight
Scaled
SM Trend 0.0000 15% weight
Scaled
Precipitation 1,872.99 10% weight
Scaled
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Soil Moisture 133.000 132.518 132.759
Recharge Estimate 1.60 1.47 1.54
PDSI 3.07 3.04 3.05
Groundwater Score 63.5 63.4 63.5
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher score suggests better long-term aquifer and moisture support conditions.

🌧️ Waterlogging

↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Waterlogging?Waterlogging combines topography, imperviousness and wetness indices across nearby grid cells.
Grid Count
9
Sampled cells
Avg Susceptibility
54.2
Lower is safer
High Risk Grids
9
High / Very High
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTargetStatus
Avg Susceptibility 54.2 < 40
Concern
Avg Slope 2.97° > 1°
Good
Avg Impervious 83.7% < 70%
Concern
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher susceptibility and low slope increase monsoon water stagnation probability.

🚶 Walkability & Safety

↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Walkability & Safety?OSM amenity metrics reflect pedestrian, safety and urban accessibility infrastructure.
Footpaths
38
Higher better
Street Lamps
0
Higher better
Police/Fire Access
1
Presence
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Footpaths (500m) 38 ≥ 3
Good
Sidewalk Roads (1km) 0 ≥ 5
Concern
Nearest Police Station 727 m ≤ 2000m
Context
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher OSM accessibility/safety features generally improve everyday livability.

🌬️ Air Quality: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

💧 Water Quality: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🧹 Sanitation: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🛣️ Infrastructure: Infrastructure Score Formula

Formula: Composite weighted model from GHSL/ESA/VIIRS/Terrain features
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Urbanization index100.0020%SMOD
Built-up balance77.5%15%Best in moderate band
NTL stability67.0%15%Power/activity consistency
Avg building height8.87 m10%Vertical infra proxy
Impervious %54.2%10%Moderate is optimal
Radiance30.3610%Development proxy
Slope0.10°10%Flatter is better
Green support12.8%10%Tree + grass contribution
This is the same weighted structure used in Livability Infrastructure model.
Final: 78.55 / 100

🏥 Amenities: Amenity Score Breakdown

Formula: Each amenity category is capped at 100, final score is averaged across categories
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Hospitals 500m0 * 33Cap 100Health access
Schools 1km4 * 20Cap 100Education access
Markets 1km5 * 33Cap 100Daily needs
Parks 500m4 * 33Cap 100Open space
Transit 1km3 * 50Cap 100Mobility
Category multipliers mirror the Livability snapshot logic.
Final: Final from amenity_scores table

🌳 Green Cover: Green Score Formula

Formula: Score = (NDVI*40%) + (Vegetation*30%) + (Dense Green*20%) + (Parks*10%)
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
NDVI component0.255 => 51.040%20.4
Vegetation component25.8% => 25.830%7.8
Dense green component11.1% => 22.220%4.4
Parks component4 => 100.010%10.0
This matches the Livability GreenCover model weighting logic.
Final: 42.60 / 100

🔊 Noise: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🌊 Flood Risk: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🏚️ Earthquake Risk: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🌡️ Land Surface Temp: LST Score Formula

Formula: Score = ((45 - LST Mean) / 25) * 100, clipped to [0,100]
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
LST Mean31.87 °CReference20°C best, 45°C worst
Lower land surface temperature means better livability.
Final: 52.52 / 100

🏗️ Built-up Density: Built-up Score Formula

Formula: Score = 100 - Built-up %
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Built-up %77.5%InverseLower is better
Dense concrete surfaces reduce infiltration and increase heat islands.
Final: 22.46 / 100

💡 Night-time Lights: Night-time Lights Formula

Formula: Score = min(100, (Avg Radiance / 50) * 100)
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Avg Radiance30.75Scale 0-50Higher indicates activity
Higher night radiance generally tracks electrification and economic intensity.
Final: 61.51 / 100

🏞️ Water Bodies: Water Bodies Score Formula

Formula: Score = (Permanent Water Score * 70%) + (Seasonal Water Score * 30%)
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Permanent water37.96%70%Scaled against 10% benchmark
Seasonal water94.21%30%Scaled against 20% benchmark
Permanent water has higher score weight than seasonal water.
Final: 100.00 / 100

👥 Population Density: Population Density Formula

Formula: Score = ((20000 - density_per_km²) / 20000) * 100, clipped to [0,100]
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Density8,267.5 /km²Inverse scaleLower density -> higher score
This follows the Livability PopulationDensity model.
Final: 58.66 / 100

⛲ Groundwater: Groundwater Score Formula

Formula: Weighted: Soil Moisture 30% + Recharge 25% + PDSI 20% + Trend 15% + Precipitation 10%
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Soil moisture132.75930%Scaled to 0-200
Recharge estimate1.5425%Scaled -200 to +400
PDSI3.0520%Scaled -4 to +4
SM trend0.000015%Scaled -50 to +50
Precipitation1,872.9910%Scaled 800 to 1800
Exactly reused from Livability Groundwater model logic.
Final: 63.45 / 100

🌧️ Waterlogging: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🚶 Walkability & Safety: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

View full livability report for Indra Nagar →

Compliance Status

RERA registration, filings, and compliance flags based on public CG-RERA records.

Compliance Status Based on public CG-RERA records
2 Passed
1 Warning
1 Issue(s)
2 N/A
RERA Registration Active
Reg No. PCGRERA121218000868 — Status: Ongoing
Section 3 · Source · RERA Official Page
No Penalty Orders
2 order(s) on record, none with penalty sections (Sec 38/39/40/59/61/63)
Sec 38–63 · Source
1 Order(s) in Last 12 Months
Recent: M-COM-2019-00660
Source · M-COM-2019-00660
Completion Overdue
Was due 30 Jun 2023 — overdue by ~35 month(s)
Section 4 · Source
Quarterly Updates Not Available
No compliance snapshot data on record
Section 11 · Source
Annual Audit Not Available
No compliance snapshot data on record
Section 4(2)(l)(D) · Source
Each check is based on publicly available CG-RERA portal data as of May 2026. How this works →

Details

Registration, professional team, bank, promoters, and compliance history.

Registration Details
RERA Number
PCGRERA121218000868
Status
Ongoing
Project Type
Residential Development
Approved Date
12 Dec 2018
Original End Date
30 Sep 2022
EWS Category
NO
Construction Cost
₹ 279492000
Land Cost
₹ 71310000
Proposed Completion
30 Jun 2023
Authorised Person
ANIL AGRAWAL
View on Map
Professional Team
RoleNameLicense / Membership
Statutory CA PRIYAL AGRAWAL 443812
Quarterly CA Akarsh Agrawal 433675
Engineer PRASHANT RAHANGDALE 861/2017
Architect AR.ANURAG HARDEL CA/2018/91789
Promoters
M
MANAKSHYA BUILDERS & DEVELOPERS Partnership Firm
M
MANAKSHYA BUILDERS & DEVELOPERS
M
MANAKSHYA BUILDERS & DEVELOPERS THROUGH - ANIL AGRAWAL

Buildings & Units

Inventory overview, sold/unsold breakdown, and building details.

Inventory Overview
48
Total Inventory
2
Sold (4%)
46
Unsold (96%)
0
Mortgage (0%)
4%
96%
Sold Unsold Mortgage
Quarterly Plot Updates
PeriodTotalSold (prev)Sold (qtr)RemainingMortgage
2025-10-01 – 2025-12-31 0 0 0 0 0
2025-07-01 – 2025-09-30 0 0 0 0 0
2025-04-01 – 2025-06-30 0 0 0 0 0
2025-01-01 – 2025-03-31 0 0 0 0 0
2019-07-01 – 2024-12-31 0 0 0 0 0
2019-04-01 – 2019-06-30 0 0 0 0 0
2019-01-01 – 2019-03-31 0 0 0 0 0
2018-10-01 – 2018-12-31 0 0 0 0 0
Quarterly Building Updates
PeriodTotalSold (prev)Sold (qtr)RemainingMortgage
2025-10-01 – 2025-12-31 0 0 0 0 0
2025-07-01 – 2025-09-30 0 0 0 0 0
2025-04-01 – 2025-06-30 0 0 0 0 0
2025-01-01 – 2025-03-31 0 0 0 0 0
2019-07-01 – 2024-12-31 0 0 0 0 0
2019-04-01 – 2019-06-30 0 0 0 0 0
2019-01-01 – 2019-03-31 0 0 0 0 0
2018-10-01 – 2018-12-31 0 0 0 0 0
Quarterly Apartment Updates
PeriodTotalSold (prev)Sold (qtr)RemainingMortgage
2025-10-01 – 2025-12-31 48 2 0 46 0
2025-07-01 – 2025-09-30 48 2 0 46 0
2025-04-01 – 2025-06-30 48 2 0 46 0
2025-01-01 – 2025-03-31 48 2 0 46 0
2019-07-01 – 2024-12-31 48 2 0 46 0
2019-04-01 – 2019-06-30 48 2 0 46 5
2019-01-01 – 2019-03-31 0 0 0 0 5
2018-10-01 – 2018-12-31 48 0 0 48 5

Legal Orders & Cases

RERA legal orders, complaints, and case statistics filed against this project.

2
Total Cases
1
Last 12 Months
1
Older Cases
2
PDFs Available
Legal Orders (2)
ComplaintApplicantSectionDateSourcePDF
M-COM-2019-00660 CG-RERA - 26 Nov 2025 This project
SM-EXP-2024-02468 CG-RERA - 04 Sep 2024 This project

Location

Project address, coordinates, and nearby places.

Location Details
Address
VILLAGE - GUDHIYARI, RAIPUR (C.G.)
District
Raipur
Tehsil
Raipur
Coordinates
21.2602353, 81.6238188 View on Map
Area Livability

Livability of Indra Nagar Raipur

Environmental, infrastructure & amenity parameters for the area where this project is located (0.45 km from project). Each value is compared with the Raipur average.

Composite Livability Score
60.5 / 100
Grade B · Average
+1.6 vs Raipur avg (58.9)
Air Quality
98.0 Excellent
Area
98
City
99
-0.6 vs city avg
Water Quality
74.5 Good
Area
75
City
68
+6.6 vs city avg
Sanitation
58.2 Average
Area
58
City
56
+2.2 vs city avg
Green Cover
46.8 Below Avg
Area
47
City
39
+8.3 vs city avg
Noise Level
46.9 Below Avg
Area
47
City
58
-11.0 vs city avg
Infrastructure
78.6 Good
Area
79
City
76
+2.4 vs city avg
Amenities
89.1 Excellent
Area
89
City
82
+7.3 vs city avg
Flood Safety
40.0 Below Avg
Area
40
City
38
+1.9 vs city avg
Earthquake Safety
10.0 Poor
Area
10
City
15
-4.6 vs city avg
Land Surface Temp.
52.5 Average
Area
53
City
58
-5.3 vs city avg
Built-up Density
22.5 Poor
Area
22
City
35
-12.3 vs city avg
Night-light Activity
61.5 Average
Area
62
City
55
+6.8 vs city avg
Water Bodies Nearby
100.0 Excellent
Area
100
City
93
+7.3 vs city avg
Population Density
58.7 Average
Area
59
City
68
-9.2 vs city avg
Groundwater Status
63.5 Average
Area
63
City
63
+0.1 vs city avg
View detailed livability report for Indra Nagar
Neighborhood Intelligence

Explore nearby infrastructure around this project. Toggle categories to show/hide on the map.

Neighborhood Map 3 km radius
RERA Projects Near ORION 25 found within 3 km
# Project District Status Distance
1 GULMOHAR PARK Raipur Ongoing 0.93 km
2 pmay of 280(dus) at kata chirhuldih ,raipur Raipur Ongoing 1.11 km
3 RAJARIA INDUSTRIAL EUIPMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED Raipur Ongoing 1.13 km
4 AKANKSHA PARISAR Raipur Ongoing 1.20 km
5 CREST GREENS Raipur Ongoing 1.40 km
6 PITHALIA PLAZA Raipur Ongoing 1.41 km
7 LALGANGA MIDAS Raipur Ongoing 1.49 km
8 RAHEJA TOWER Raipur Ongoing 1.52 km
9 mansarovar residency Raipur Ongoing 1.55 km
10 PMAY OF 576 DUS VILLAGE -KOTA CHIRHULDIH , - RAIPUR Raipur Ongoing 1.68 km
11 SAMRAJYA RESIDENCY Raipur New 1.84 km
12 KALPTARU CASITA Raipur New 2.00 km
13 METROPOLIS Raipur Ongoing 2.01 km
14 ANAND ARCADE Raipur Ongoing 2.11 km
15 ANUGRAH RESIDENCY Raipur Ongoing 2.13 km
16 saheb society Raipur Ongoing 2.35 km
17 Avinash Aashiyana Extension Raipur New 2.40 km
18 GOLDEN ARCADE Raipur Ongoing 2.43 km
19 PMAY OF 58 DUS AT NEAR DKS PARISAR ,RAIPUR Raipur Ongoing 2.47 km
20 construction of 27 no jr mig(3bhk) at phase-4 kabir nagar raipur Raipur New 2.48 km
21 SIMRAN HEIGHTS Raipur Ongoing 2.76 km
22 ashapura homes Raipur Ongoing 2.86 km
23 PARK AVENUE Raipur New 2.93 km
24 O2 business center Raipur Ongoing 2.97 km
25 BRIGHT ENCLAVE Raipur Ongoing 2.99 km

Buyer Checklist

Documents and verifications a buyer should review before purchase.

Buyer Document Verification Checklist

Key documents a buyer should verify before purchasing in this project. Items marked Available have data on Seemankan.

12/14 verified
  • RERA Registration Certificate Available
    Confirms the project is registered with RERA CG. Verify registration number, validity dates, and project details on the RERA portal.
    RERA No: PCGRERA121218000868
    View on RERA Portal
  • Promoter Registration Certificate Available
    Builder / colonizer company registration certificate. Confirms the promoter entity is a registered firm, company, or society.
    Preview Preview
  • Approved Building / Sanction Plan Available
    Building plan sanctioned by the local authority. Verify floor count, setbacks, and FSI compliance.
    Preview
  • Layout Plan Available
    Approved layout showing plot divisions, roads, open spaces, and common areas.
    Preview
  • Title Deed / Ownership Proof Available
    Proof that the promoter legally owns the land. Verify via Sub-Registrar records.
    Preview
  • Encumbrance Certificate Available
    Confirms the property is free from legal dues, mortgages, or liens. Obtain from Sub-Registrar office.
    Preview
  • Land Use / Diversion Certificate Available
    Required if land was converted from agricultural to non-agricultural use.
    Preview
  • Architect Certificate Available
    Certification from a registered architect confirming structural plans and compliance.
    View View View +6 more
  • Structural Engineer Certificate Available
    Certification from a structural engineer confirming building safety and load-bearing capacity.
    View View View +6 more
  • CA Financial Certificate Available
    Chartered Accountant certificate on financial status, project cost estimates, and fund utilization.
    Preview View View +7 more
  • Commencement Certificate Verify Independently
    Permission to begin construction issued by the local authority after plan approval.
  • NOCs (No Objection Certificates) Verify Independently
    NOCs from fire department, environment, water supply, electricity board, and other authorities.
  • Project Brochure / Specification Available
    Official brochure with unit types, amenities, and specifications. Compare with actual delivery.
    View View View +5 more
  • RERA Compliance Orders Available
    Check if any orders, penalties, or directions have been issued against this project by RERA.
    2 order(s) on record — review in Legal tab
Disclaimer: This checklist is for informational purposes only. "Available" means Seemankan has a copy from the RERA portal — it does not constitute legal verification. Always verify original documents with the concerned authorities and consult a legal advisor before making a purchase decision.

Risk Zone Within 5 km

Buffer zones (water bodies, airport restrictions) and risk sites (landfills, waste processing) detected within 3 km (immediate) and 5 km (extended) of the project.

27
Risk zones (within 5 km)
3 km: 10 3–5 km: 17
22
Water bodies (river/nala/lake)
3 km: 10 3–5 km: 12
5
Landfill / waste sites
3 km: 0 3–5 km: 5
0
Airport buffer overlap
3 km: 0 3–5 km: 0
Risk Zone Map (3 km & 5 km rings) Project marker centered
Water Bodies (22)
  • Maharajband Talab ≤3 km
    Tank · 50m buffer
    0.66 km
  • Devpuri Nala ≤3 km
    Nala · 20m buffer
    1.37 km
  • Tatibandh Nala ≤3 km
    Nala · 20m buffer
    1.75 km
  • Kankali Talab ≤3 km
    Tank · 50m buffer
    1.78 km
  • Tatibandh Talab ≤3 km
    Tank · 50m buffer
    1.87 km
  • Mowa Talab ≤3 km
    Tank · 50m buffer
    2.31 km
  • Bhatagaon Nala ≤3 km
    Nala · 20m buffer
    2.5 km
  • Mowa Nala ≤3 km
    Nala · 20m buffer
    2.61 km
Landfill / Waste Sites (5)
  • Tatibandh Legacy Dump 3–5 km
    Legacy dump · 500m buffer
    3.37 km
  • Gudhiyari Old Dump Site 3–5 km
    Legacy dump · 500m buffer
    3.5 km
  • Sarora SLRM Centre (Manikanchan Kendra) 3–5 km
    Waste processing · 200m buffer
    3.75 km
  • SLRM Centre Tendua (Tundra) 3–5 km
    Waste processing · 200m buffer
    4.54 km
  • Purena-Birgaon Legacy Dump 3–5 km
    Legacy dump · 500m buffer
    4.98 km

Documents

RERA-filed documents and disclosures available for this project.

RERA Documents (125)
APARTMENTPHOTO (48)
View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View
ARCH (9)
View View View View View View View View View
AminitiesPHOTO (20)
View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View
BOROUCHRE (6)
View View View View View View
BRIEF (1)
Preview
BUILDING (1)
Preview
CA (10)
Preview View View View View View View View View View
COLONIZER (1)
Preview
COMMON (1)
Preview
DEVE (1)
Preview
DIVERSION (1)
Preview
Demarcation (1)
Preview
ENGG (9)
View View View View View View View View View
ENUM (1)
Preview
FEESHEET (1)
Preview
LAYOUT (1)
Preview
PASSBOOK (1)
Preview
PHOTO (1)
Download
PSPEC (1)
Preview
Reg (1)
Preview
SEARCH (1)
Preview
SELF (1)
Preview
TAC (1)
Preview
other (6)
Preview Preview Preview Preview Preview Preview

Reviews

Verified buyer reviews and ratings for this project.

No reviews yet. Be the first to review this project!

Login to Write a Review

You need to be signed in to submit a review for this project.

Login or Register