RealEstateIQTM
IN हिन्दी
Login Sign Up Free
Want a full project intelligence report? Download a detailed PDF report — RERA compliance, promoter, financials, amenities, location & risk.
Generate Project Report
Home / RERA Projects / MILL MACHINERY & HARDWARE BUSINESS PARK
NEW Commercial Plotted Development RERA Page
GENERATE REPORT

MILL MACHINERY & HARDWARE BUSINESS PARK

Compliance Status
Compliant
21.2511, 81.6332 Explore area
District
Raipur
Area
—
Promoter
AKHTAR BROTHERS
Project Information
Promoter AKHTAR BROTHERS
Type Commercial Plotted Development
Status New
Completion 01 Dec 2030
RERA No. PCGRERA280126002034
Registered 28 Jan 2026
Original End 01 Dec 2030
Total Units 38
EWS Category NO
Construction Cost ₹ 22399000
Land Cost ₹ 798482000
Authorised Person MOHAMMAD ASGAR
Address NEAR GURUNANAK CHOWK, STATION ROAD, RAIPUR, C.G.
At a Glance
38
Total Units
-
Units Sold
38
Unsold
0
Legal Cases
Dec 2030
Target Completion
-
Completion
Project Analysis

360° Project Intelligence

Comprehensive analysis across regulatory, livability, market, filing activity, and market readiness dimensions.

Regulatory
64
9 of 14 checks · Moderate Signals
Livability
66
Ramsagar Para · Moderate Signals
Legal
0
No legal orders on record · 21 nearby
Filing Activity
23
23 docs · 0 quarterly updates
Market Readiness
25
New · due Dec 2030
Area Livability

Livability of Ramsagar Para

Eighteen environmental, infrastructure and amenity parameters for the nearest mapped area (Ramsagar Para — 0.54 km from this project). Click any parameter for the underlying readings, thresholds and what they mean.



🏠 Livability Parameters

Latest readings for Ramsagar Para. Only parameters with available data are shown below. Based on the latest readings for Ramsagar Para.

B
Composite Score
65.8 /100
Good

🌬️ Air Quality

Final Score: 97.2/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Air Quality?AQI summarizes PM2.5, PM10 and gases. Lower pollution values improve public health outcomes.
AQI
57
Satisfactory
PM2.5
21.2 µg/m³
≤ 40
PM10
68.5 µg/m³
≤ 60
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
PM2.5 21.2 µg/m³ ≤ 40
Good
PM10 68.5 µg/m³ ≤ 60
Concern
NO₂ 42.8 µg/m³ ≤ 40
Concern
💡 What does this mean for you?Cleaner air lowers respiratory burden and improves outdoor comfort.

💧 Water Quality

Final Score: 74.4/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Water Quality?Water quality combines chemistry, supply duration and contamination markers.
TDS
373 ppm
≤ 500
pH
7.24
6.5–8.5
Supply
5.4 hr/day
≥ 8 hr
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
TDS 373 ppm ≤ 500
Good
Fluoride 0.69 mg/L ≤ 1.0
Good
Turbidity 5.4 NTU ≤ 1
Concern
💡 What does this mean for you?Better supply quality and consistency reduces dependence on tanker/groundwater fallback.

🧹 Sanitation

Final Score: 62.8/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Sanitation?Sanitation reflects ODF status, sewage treatment and waste management regularity.
ODF
ODF+
ODF++
Sewage Coverage
50%
≥ 80%
Drainage
60%
≥ 90%
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
ODF Status ODF+ ODF++
Info
Sewage Coverage 50% ≥ 80%
Concern
Drainage Coverage 60% ≥ 90%
Concern
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher sanitation maturity lowers disease exposure and neighborhood nuisance.

🛣️ Infrastructure

Final Score: 77.4/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Infrastructure?Infrastructure score combines land use, urbanization, built form, night lights and terrain indicators.
Built-up
82.1%
Balanced band
Tree Cover
10.1%
≥ 15%
Urbanization
100.0
Higher better
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Built-up (LULC) 82.1% 40-70%
Contextual
Impervious Surface 57.7% < 70%
Good
NDVI Mean 0.210 > 0.3
Concern
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Built-up (LULC) % 88.2% 76.1% 82.1%
Tree Cover % 6.3% 13.8% 10.1%
Urbanization Index 100.0 100.0 100.0
Infra Score 74.0 80.9 77.8
💡 What does this mean for you?Balanced built + green mix usually improves long-term livability resilience.

🏥 Amenities

Final Score: 85.8/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Amenities?Amenity score captures daily-access services in walk/short-drive radii.
Hospitals 500m
0
Target ≥1
Schools 1km
4
Target ≥3
Parks 500m
2
Target ≥1
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Hospitals (500m) 0 ≥1
Concern
Schools (1km) 4 ≥3
Good
Markets (1km) 3 ≥1
Good
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher local amenity density improves convenience and walkability.

🌳 Green Cover

Final Score: 44.5/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Green Cover?NDVI and vegetation structure are measured from satellite imagery to estimate neighborhood greenery.
NDVI Mean
0.262
Greenness index
Vegetation
24.2%
% green pixels
Dense Green
11.0%
Thick canopy
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
NDVI Mean 0.262 0.5 maps to score 100
Weighted 40%
Vegetation % 24.2% Direct % (cap 100)
Weighted 30%
Dense Green % 11.0% Scaled from 50%
Weighted 20%
Parks within 500m 2 Count * 33 (cap 100)
Weighted 10%
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
NDVI Mean 0.208 0.315 0.262
Vegetation % 23.9% 24.4% 24.2%
Dense Green % 8.6% 13.4% 11.0%
Tree Canopy % 21.0% 20.7% 20.9%
Green Score 33.9 44.5 39.2
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher green metrics typically reduce heat stress and improve comfort.

🔊 Noise

Final Score: 100.0/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Noise?Noise uses measured day/night dB compared to CPCB zone limits.
Day dB
55.0
vs CPCB day limit
Night dB
49.9
vs CPCB night limit
Zone
residential
CPCB class
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Day Noise 55.0 dB ≤ 55.0 dB
Good
Night Noise 49.9 dB ≤ 45.0 dB
Concern
Nearest Highway — m Higher usually quieter
Info
💡 What does this mean for you?Chronic high noise impacts stress, sleep quality and perceived comfort.

🌊 Flood Risk

Final Score: 40.0/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Flood Risk?Flood risk combines river exposure and local waterlogging vulnerability.
Overall Risk
Medium
Lower is safer
River Risk
Medium
Lower is safer
Waterlogging
Medium
Lower is safer
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Overall Risk Medium Low preferred
Info
River Flood Risk Medium Low preferred
Info
Waterlogging Risk Medium Low preferred
Info
💡 What does this mean for you?Lower flood risk means less disruption and lower hazard exposure.

🏚️ Earthquake Risk

Final Score: 10.0/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Earthquake Risk?Earthquake profile uses seismic zone, PGA and soil/liquefaction risk factors.
Seismic Zone
Zone II
Lower risk zone preferred
Risk Level
Low
Low preferred
Liquefaction
None
Low preferred
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Seismic Zone Zone II II preferred
Info
Risk Level Low Low preferred
Info
PGA (475yr) 0.0155g Lower preferred
Info
💡 What does this mean for you?Lower seismic hazard reduces structural and insurance risk exposure.

🌡️ Land Surface Temp

Final Score: 53.1/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Land Surface Temp?Land Surface Temperature reflects heat-island intensity from satellite thermal bands.
LST Mean
31.7°C
Lower better
LST Min
24.8°C
Context
LST Max
40.9°C
Lower better
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
LST Mean 31.7°C 20°C best / 45°C worst
Weighted by formula
LST Score 53.1 0-100
Computed
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
LST Mean (°C) 32.4 31.1 31.7
LST Min (°C) 26.3 23.4 24.8
LST Max (°C) 41.7 40.1 40.9
LST Score 50.6 55.6 53.1
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher heat exposure affects comfort, cooling load and health risk.

🏗️ Built-up Density

Final Score: 17.9/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Built-up Density?Built-up density measures extent of developed surface versus open space.
Built-up %
82.1%
Lower better
Open Space %
17.9%
Higher better
Built-up Score
17.9
0-100
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Built-up % 82.1% Inverse scoring
Score = 100 - builtup%
Open Space % 17.9% Context
Info
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Built-up % 88.2% 76.1% 82.1%
Open Space % 11.8% 23.9% 17.9%
Built-up Score 11.8 23.9 17.9
💡 What does this mean for you?Very high built-up often raises heat and runoff while reducing open environmental buffers.

💡 Night-time Lights

Final Score: 68.4/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Night-time Lights?Nighttime lights are a proxy for economic activity and electrification intensity.
Avg Radiance
34.21
Higher better
Max Radiance
55.98
Context
NTL Score
68.4
0-100
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Avg Radiance 34.21 Scaled to 50
Score = min(100, avg/50*100)
NTL Score 68.4 0-100
Computed
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Avg Radiance 38.14 30.28 34.21
Max Radiance 64.07 47.89 55.98
NTL Score 76.3 60.6 68.4
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher radiance often indicates stronger urban activity but can correlate with light pollution.

🏞️ Water Bodies

Final Score: 100.0/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Water Bodies?Water-bodies score reflects permanent and seasonal water presence in the analysis radius.
Permanent Water
60.37%
Higher generally better
Seasonal Water
95.59%
Context
Water Score
100.0
0-100
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Permanent Water % 60.37% 70% weight
Scaled against 10%
Seasonal Water % 95.59% 30% weight
Scaled against 20%
Water Score 100.0 0-100
Computed
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Permanent Water % 51.20% 69.53% 60.37%
Seasonal Water % 93.78% 97.40% 95.59%
Water Score 100.0 100.0 100.0
💡 What does this mean for you?Water presence can support cooling, recharge and ecological quality.

👥 Population Density

Final Score: 59.1/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Population Density?Population density indicates urban crowding pressure around the area.
Population
126,811
Estimated residents
Density/km²
8,173.0
Lower better for this score
Score
59.1
0-100
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Density/km² 8,173.0 Inverse scale up to 20,000
Lower -> higher score
Score 59.1 0-100
Computed
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Population Total 26,069 227,552 126,811
Density / km² 8,298.0 8,048.0 8,173.0
Pop Density Score 58.5 59.8 59.1
💡 What does this mean for you?Extremely high density can increase pressure on services and mobility.

⛲ Groundwater

Final Score: 63.4/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Groundwater?Groundwater score combines moisture, recharge, drought and trend indicators.
Soil Moisture
133.092
Higher better
Recharge
0.87
Higher better
PDSI
3.01
Higher better
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Soil Moisture 133.092 30% weight
Scaled
Recharge 0.87 25% weight
Scaled
PDSI 3.01 20% weight
Scaled
SM Trend 0.0000 15% weight
Scaled
Precipitation 1,874.35 10% weight
Scaled
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Soil Moisture 133.467 132.717 133.092
Recharge Estimate 0.66 1.08 0.87
PDSI 3.02 3.01 3.01
Groundwater Score 63.4 63.3 63.4
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher score suggests better long-term aquifer and moisture support conditions.

🌧️ Waterlogging

↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Waterlogging?Waterlogging combines topography, imperviousness and wetness indices across nearby grid cells.
Grid Count
3
Sampled cells
Avg Susceptibility
52.8
Lower is safer
High Risk Grids
3
High / Very High
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTargetStatus
Avg Susceptibility 52.8 < 40
Concern
Avg Slope 2.86° > 1°
Good
Avg Impervious 89.8% < 70%
Concern
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher susceptibility and low slope increase monsoon water stagnation probability.

🚶 Walkability & Safety

↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Walkability & Safety?OSM amenity metrics reflect pedestrian, safety and urban accessibility infrastructure.
Footpaths
0
Higher better
Street Lamps
0
Higher better
Police/Fire Access
2
Presence
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Footpaths (500m) 0 ≥ 3
Concern
Sidewalk Roads (1km) 0 ≥ 5
Concern
Nearest Police Station 1,516 m ≤ 2000m
Context
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher OSM accessibility/safety features generally improve everyday livability.

⚠️ Risk Factors

↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Risk Factors?Nearby hazards and sensitive risk points mapped around this area.
Total Risks
4
Mapped points
Scoring Breakdown
CategoryRiskDistance / SeverityMeaning
Infrastructure Irregular Municipal Water 0 m / High Municipal supply once daily for 1-2 hours only
Environmental Nallah Through Ramsagar Colony 100 m / High Open drain running through middle of residential colony
Water_drainage Low-Lying Colony Waterlogging 150 m / High Colony built in natural depression, repeated monsoon flooding
Health_nuisance Pond Remnant Mosquito Breeding 300 m / Medium Old pond converted to dumping ground with stagnant water pockets
💡 What does this mean for you?Closer and severe risks can affect insurance, resale and safety comfort.

🌬️ Air Quality: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

💧 Water Quality: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🧹 Sanitation: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🛣️ Infrastructure: Infrastructure Score Formula

Formula: Composite weighted model from GHSL/ESA/VIIRS/Terrain features
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Urbanization index100.0020%SMOD
Built-up balance82.1%15%Best in moderate band
NTL stability66.0%15%Power/activity consistency
Avg building height9.84 m10%Vertical infra proxy
Impervious %57.7%10%Moderate is optimal
Radiance34.0510%Development proxy
Slope0.10°10%Flatter is better
Green support10.1%10%Tree + grass contribution
This is the same weighted structure used in Livability Infrastructure model.
Final: 77.75 / 100

🏥 Amenities: Amenity Score Breakdown

Formula: Each amenity category is capped at 100, final score is averaged across categories
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Hospitals 500m0 * 33Cap 100Health access
Schools 1km4 * 20Cap 100Education access
Markets 1km3 * 33Cap 100Daily needs
Parks 500m2 * 33Cap 100Open space
Transit 1km3 * 50Cap 100Mobility
Category multipliers mirror the Livability snapshot logic.
Final: Final from amenity_scores table

🌳 Green Cover: Green Score Formula

Formula: Score = (NDVI*40%) + (Vegetation*30%) + (Dense Green*20%) + (Parks*10%)
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
NDVI component0.262 => 52.440%21.0
Vegetation component24.2% => 24.230%7.3
Dense green component11.0% => 22.020%4.4
Parks component2 => 66.010%6.6
This matches the Livability GreenCover model weighting logic.
Final: 39.21 / 100

🔊 Noise: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🌊 Flood Risk: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🏚️ Earthquake Risk: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🌡️ Land Surface Temp: LST Score Formula

Formula: Score = ((45 - LST Mean) / 25) * 100, clipped to [0,100]
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
LST Mean31.72 °CReference20°C best, 45°C worst
Lower land surface temperature means better livability.
Final: 53.12 / 100

🏗️ Built-up Density: Built-up Score Formula

Formula: Score = 100 - Built-up %
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Built-up %82.1%InverseLower is better
Dense concrete surfaces reduce infiltration and increase heat islands.
Final: 17.88 / 100

💡 Night-time Lights: Night-time Lights Formula

Formula: Score = min(100, (Avg Radiance / 50) * 100)
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Avg Radiance34.21Scale 0-50Higher indicates activity
Higher night radiance generally tracks electrification and economic intensity.
Final: 68.42 / 100

🏞️ Water Bodies: Water Bodies Score Formula

Formula: Score = (Permanent Water Score * 70%) + (Seasonal Water Score * 30%)
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Permanent water60.37%70%Scaled against 10% benchmark
Seasonal water95.59%30%Scaled against 20% benchmark
Permanent water has higher score weight than seasonal water.
Final: 100.00 / 100

👥 Population Density: Population Density Formula

Formula: Score = ((20000 - density_per_km²) / 20000) * 100, clipped to [0,100]
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Density8,173.0 /km²Inverse scaleLower density -> higher score
This follows the Livability PopulationDensity model.
Final: 59.14 / 100

⛲ Groundwater: Groundwater Score Formula

Formula: Weighted: Soil Moisture 30% + Recharge 25% + PDSI 20% + Trend 15% + Precipitation 10%
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Soil moisture133.09230%Scaled to 0-200
Recharge estimate0.8725%Scaled -200 to +400
PDSI3.0120%Scaled -4 to +4
SM trend0.000015%Scaled -50 to +50
Precipitation1,874.3510%Scaled 800 to 1800
Exactly reused from Livability Groundwater model logic.
Final: 63.37 / 100

🌧️ Waterlogging: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🚶 Walkability & Safety: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

⚠️ Risk Factors: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

View full livability report for Ramsagar Para →

Compliance Status

RERA registration, filings, and compliance flags based on public CG-RERA records.

Compliance Status Based on public CG-RERA records
4 Passed
2 N/A
RERA Registration Active
Reg No. PCGRERA280126002034 — Status: New
Section 3 · Source · RERA Official Page
No RERA Orders
No complaints or orders found against this project
Sec 38–63 · Source
No Orders in Last 12 Months
Clean record — no complaints or orders filed
Source
Within Timeline
Target completion: 01 Dec 2030
Section 4 · Source
Quarterly Updates Not Available
No compliance snapshot data on record
Section 11 · Source
Annual Audit Not Available
No compliance snapshot data on record
Section 4(2)(l)(D) · Source
Each check is based on publicly available CG-RERA portal data as of May 2026. How this works →

Details

Registration, professional team, bank, promoters, and compliance history.

Registration Details
RERA Number
PCGRERA280126002034
Status
New
Project Type
Commercial Plotted Development
Approved Date
28 Jan 2026
Original End Date
01 Dec 2030
EWS Category
NO
Construction Cost
₹ 22399000
Land Cost
₹ 798482000
Proposed Completion
01 Dec 2030
Authorised Person
MOHAMMAD ASGAR
View on Map
Promoters
A
akhtar brothers Partnership Firm

Buildings & Units

Inventory overview, sold/unsold breakdown, and building details.

Inventory Overview
38
Total Inventory
0
Sold (0%)
38
Unsold (100%)
0
Mortgage (0%)
100%
Sold Unsold Mortgage

Legal Orders & Cases

RERA legal orders, complaints, and case statistics filed against this project.

Legal Orders (0)
ComplaintApplicantSectionDateSourcePDF
No orders found for this project.

Location

Project address, coordinates, and nearby places.

Location Details
Address
NEAR GURUNANAK CHOWK, STATION ROAD, RAIPUR, C.G.
District
Raipur
Tehsil
Raipur
Coordinates
21.2510815, 81.6332439 View on Map
Area Livability

Livability of Ramsagar Para Raipur

Environmental, infrastructure & amenity parameters for the area where this project is located (0.54 km from project). Each value is compared with the Raipur average.

Composite Livability Score
65.8 / 100
Grade B · Good
+6.9 vs Raipur avg (58.9)
Air Quality
97.2 Excellent
Area
97
City
99
-1.4 vs city avg
Water Quality
74.4 Good
Area
74
City
68
+6.5 vs city avg
Sanitation
62.8 Average
Area
63
City
56
+6.8 vs city avg
Green Cover
44.5 Below Avg
Area
44
City
39
+6.0 vs city avg
Noise Level
100.0 Excellent
Area
100
City
58
+42.2 vs city avg
Infrastructure
77.4 Good
Area
77
City
76
+1.2 vs city avg
Amenities
85.8 Excellent
Area
86
City
82
+4.0 vs city avg
Flood Safety
40.0 Below Avg
Area
40
City
38
+1.9 vs city avg
Earthquake Safety
10.0 Poor
Area
10
City
15
-4.6 vs city avg
Land Surface Temp.
53.1 Average
Area
53
City
58
-4.7 vs city avg
Built-up Density
17.9 Poor
Area
18
City
35
-16.9 vs city avg
Night-light Activity
68.4 Good
Area
68
City
55
+13.7 vs city avg
Water Bodies Nearby
100.0 Excellent
Area
100
City
93
+7.3 vs city avg
Population Density
59.1 Average
Area
59
City
68
-8.8 vs city avg
Groundwater Status
63.4 Average
Area
63
City
63
0.0 vs city avg
View detailed livability report for Ramsagar Para
Neighborhood Intelligence

Explore nearby infrastructure around this project. Toggle categories to show/hide on the map.

Neighborhood Map 3 km radius
RERA Projects Near MILL MACHINERY & HARDWARE BUSINESS PARK 21 found within 3 km
# Project District Status Distance
1 PITHALIA PLAZA Raipur Ongoing 0.42 km
2 RAJARIA INDUSTRIAL EUIPMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED Raipur Ongoing 0.63 km
3 AKANKSHA PARISAR Raipur Ongoing 0.66 km
4 METROPOLIS Raipur Ongoing 0.70 km
5 ANAND ARCADE Raipur Ongoing 0.70 km
6 RAHEJA TOWER Raipur Ongoing 0.71 km
7 PMAY OF 58 DUS AT NEAR DKS PARISAR ,RAIPUR Raipur Ongoing 1.06 km
8 LALGANGA MIDAS Raipur Ongoing 1.46 km
9 GULMOHAR PARK Raipur Ongoing 1.76 km
10 pmay of 280(dus) at kata chirhuldih ,raipur Raipur Ongoing 2.00 km
11 SIMRAN HEIGHTS Raipur Ongoing 2.09 km
12 BRIGHT ENCLAVE Raipur Ongoing 2.17 km
13 CREST GREENS Raipur Ongoing 2.20 km
14 SAMRAJYA RESIDENCY Raipur New 2.40 km
15 C.G. ELITE Raipur Ongoing 2.42 km
16 KAVISH ENCLAVE Raipur New 2.46 km
17 merlin jayshree vihar (phase-ii) Raipur Ongoing 2.53 km
18 PMAY OF 576 DUS VILLAGE -KOTA CHIRHULDIH , - RAIPUR Raipur Ongoing 2.66 km
19 KALPTARU CASITA Raipur New 2.79 km
20 mansarovar residency Raipur Ongoing 2.88 km
21 OFFICE CUM RESIDENTIAL COMPLEX Raipur New 2.99 km

Buyer Checklist

Documents and verifications a buyer should review before purchase.

Buyer Document Verification Checklist

Key documents a buyer should verify before purchasing in this project. Items marked Available have data on Seemankan.

8/14 verified
  • RERA Registration Certificate Available
    Confirms the project is registered with RERA CG. Verify registration number, validity dates, and project details on the RERA portal.
    RERA No: PCGRERA280126002034
    View on RERA Portal
  • Promoter Registration Certificate Available
    Builder / colonizer company registration certificate. Confirms the promoter entity is a registered firm, company, or society.
    Preview Preview
  • Approved Building / Sanction Plan Verify Independently
    Building plan sanctioned by the local authority. Verify floor count, setbacks, and FSI compliance.
  • Layout Plan Available
    Approved layout showing plot divisions, roads, open spaces, and common areas.
    Preview
  • Title Deed / Ownership Proof Available
    Proof that the promoter legally owns the land. Verify via Sub-Registrar records.
    Preview
  • Encumbrance Certificate Available
    Confirms the property is free from legal dues, mortgages, or liens. Obtain from Sub-Registrar office.
    Preview
  • Land Use / Diversion Certificate Available
    Required if land was converted from agricultural to non-agricultural use.
    Preview
  • Architect Certificate Verify Independently
    Certification from a registered architect confirming structural plans and compliance.
  • Structural Engineer Certificate Verify Independently
    Certification from a structural engineer confirming building safety and load-bearing capacity.
  • CA Financial Certificate Available
    Chartered Accountant certificate on financial status, project cost estimates, and fund utilization.
    Preview
  • Commencement Certificate Verify Independently
    Permission to begin construction issued by the local authority after plan approval.
  • NOCs (No Objection Certificates) Verify Independently
    NOCs from fire department, environment, water supply, electricity board, and other authorities.
  • Project Brochure / Specification Available
    Official brochure with unit types, amenities, and specifications. Compare with actual delivery.
    Preview
  • RERA Compliance Orders Verify Independently
    Check if any orders, penalties, or directions have been issued against this project by RERA.
Disclaimer: This checklist is for informational purposes only. "Available" means Seemankan has a copy from the RERA portal — it does not constitute legal verification. Always verify original documents with the concerned authorities and consult a legal advisor before making a purchase decision.

Risk Zone Within 5 km

Buffer zones (water bodies, airport restrictions) and risk sites (landfills, waste processing) detected within 3 km (immediate) and 5 km (extended) of the project.

30
Risk zones (within 5 km)
3 km: 13 3–5 km: 17
27
Water bodies (river/nala/lake)
3 km: 13 3–5 km: 14
3
Landfill / waste sites
3 km: 0 3–5 km: 3
0
Airport buffer overlap
3 km: 0 3–5 km: 0
Risk Zone Map (3 km & 5 km rings) Project marker centered
Water Bodies (27)
  • Kankali Talab ≤3 km
    Tank · 50m buffer
    0.45 km
  • Devpuri Nala ≤3 km
    Nala · 20m buffer
    0.92 km
  • Maharajband Talab ≤3 km
    Tank · 50m buffer
    0.94 km
  • Amanaka Talab ≤3 km
    Tank · 50m buffer
    1.23 km
  • Bhatagaon Nala ≤3 km
    Nala · 20m buffer
    2 km
  • Budha Talab (Vivekananda Sarovar) ≤3 km
    Lake · 50m buffer
    2.12 km
  • Kharun River ≤3 km
    River · 75m buffer
    2.26 km
  • Muktangan Talab ≤3 km
    Tank · 50m buffer
    2.41 km
Landfill / Waste Sites (3)
  • SLRM Centre Tendua (Tundra) 3–5 km
    Waste processing · 200m buffer
    3.91 km
  • Gudhiyari Old Dump Site 3–5 km
    Legacy dump · 500m buffer
    4.59 km
  • Tatibandh Legacy Dump 3–5 km
    Legacy dump · 500m buffer
    4.77 km

Documents

RERA-filed documents and disclosures available for this project.

RERA Documents (23)
BRIEF (1)
Preview
CA (1)
Preview
COLONIZER (1)
Preview
COMMON (1)
Preview
DEV (1)
Preview
DEVE (1)
Preview
DIVERSION (1)
Preview
Demarcation (1)
Preview
ENUM (1)
Preview
FEESHEET (1)
Preview
LAYOUT (1)
Preview
PASSBOOK (1)
Preview
PHOTO (1)
Download
Reg (1)
Preview
SEARCH (1)
Preview
SELF (1)
Preview
TAC (1)
Preview
other (6)
Preview Preview Preview Preview Preview Preview

Reviews

Verified buyer reviews and ratings for this project.

No reviews yet. Be the first to review this project!

Login to Write a Review

You need to be signed in to submit a review for this project.

Login or Register