RealEstateIQTM
IN हिन्दी
Login Sign Up Free
Want a full project intelligence report? Download a detailed PDF report — RERA compliance, promoter, financials, amenities, location & risk.
Generate Project Report
Home / RERA Projects / CROSSWINDS
ONGOING Mixed Development RERA Page
GENERATE REPORT

CROSSWINDS

Compliance Status
Partial Compliance
21.2493, 81.6411 Explore area
District
Raipur
Area
—
Promoter
R.A. REAL ESTATE PVT.LTD, THRU-RAKESH KUMAR AGRAWAL
Project Information
Promoter R.A. REAL ESTATE PVT.LTD, THRU-RAKESH KUMAR AGRAWAL
Type Mixed Development
Status Ongoing
Completion 24 Feb 2019
RERA No. PCGRERA040718000444
Registered 04 Jul 2018
Original End 24 Feb 2019
EWS Category NO
Construction Cost ₹ 202348000
Land Cost ₹ 7000000
Authorised Person rakesh kumar agrawal
Address dr. bhimrao ambedkar, ward no. 27, raipur (c.g.)
At a Glance
-
Total Units
-
Units Sold
-
Unsold
3
Legal Cases
Feb 2019
Target Completion
-
Completion
Project Analysis

360° Project Intelligence

Comprehensive analysis across regulatory, livability, market, filing activity, and market readiness dimensions.

Regulatory
7
1 of 14 checks · Weak Signals
Livability
63
Modha Para · Moderate Signals
Legal
3
3 legal order(s) · 22 nearby
Filing Activity
0
0 docs · 0 quarterly updates
Market Readiness
35
Ongoing · due Feb 2019
Area Livability

Livability of Modha Para

Eighteen environmental, infrastructure and amenity parameters for the nearest mapped area (Modha Para — 0.33 km from this project). Click any parameter for the underlying readings, thresholds and what they mean.



🏠 Livability Parameters

Latest readings for Modha Para. Only parameters with available data are shown below. Based on the latest readings for Modha Para.

B
Composite Score
62.6 /100
Good

🌬️ Air Quality

Final Score: 98.4/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Air Quality?AQI summarizes PM2.5, PM10 and gases. Lower pollution values improve public health outcomes.
AQI
54
Satisfactory
PM2.5
20.4 µg/m³
≤ 40
PM10
68.2 µg/m³
≤ 60
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
PM2.5 20.4 µg/m³ ≤ 40
Good
PM10 68.2 µg/m³ ≤ 60
Concern
NO₂ 41.1 µg/m³ ≤ 40
Concern
💡 What does this mean for you?Cleaner air lowers respiratory burden and improves outdoor comfort.

🛣️ Infrastructure

Final Score: 81.3/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Infrastructure?Infrastructure score combines land use, urbanization, built form, night lights and terrain indicators.
Built-up
81.9%
Balanced band
Tree Cover
12.5%
≥ 15%
Urbanization
100.0
Higher better
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Built-up (LULC) 81.9% 40-70%
Contextual
Impervious Surface 45.1% < 70%
Good
NDVI Mean 0.230 > 0.3
Concern
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Built-up (LULC) % 87.3% 76.6% 81.9%
Tree Cover % 11.6% 13.3% 12.5%
Urbanization Index 100.0 100.0 100.0
Infra Score 81.3 81.3 81.7
💡 What does this mean for you?Balanced built + green mix usually improves long-term livability resilience.

🏥 Amenities

Final Score: 90.8/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Amenities?Amenity score captures daily-access services in walk/short-drive radii.
Hospitals 500m
3
Target ≥1
Schools 1km
9
Target ≥3
Parks 500m
0
Target ≥1
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Hospitals (500m) 3 ≥1
Good
Schools (1km) 9 ≥3
Good
Markets (1km) 8 ≥1
Good
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher local amenity density improves convenience and walkability.

🌳 Green Cover

Final Score: 23.4/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Green Cover?NDVI and vegetation structure are measured from satellite imagery to estimate neighborhood greenery.
NDVI Mean
0.164
Greenness index
Vegetation
16.1%
% green pixels
Dense Green
6.3%
Thick canopy
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
NDVI Mean 0.164 0.5 maps to score 100
Weighted 40%
Vegetation % 16.1% Direct % (cap 100)
Weighted 30%
Dense Green % 6.3% Scaled from 50%
Weighted 20%
Parks within 500m 0 Count * 33 (cap 100)
Weighted 10%
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
NDVI Mean 0.158 0.170 0.164
Vegetation % 10.8% 21.3% 16.1%
Dense Green % 4.1% 8.5% 6.3%
Tree Canopy % 9.9% 11.7% 10.8%
Green Score 17.5 23.4 20.5
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher green metrics typically reduce heat stress and improve comfort.

🌊 Flood Risk

Final Score: 55.0/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Flood Risk?Flood risk combines river exposure and local waterlogging vulnerability.
Overall Risk
High
Lower is safer
River Risk
Medium
Lower is safer
Waterlogging
High
Lower is safer
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Overall Risk High Low preferred
Info
River Flood Risk Medium Low preferred
Info
Waterlogging Risk High Low preferred
Info
💡 What does this mean for you?Lower flood risk means less disruption and lower hazard exposure.

🏚️ Earthquake Risk

Final Score: 25.0/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Earthquake Risk?Earthquake profile uses seismic zone, PGA and soil/liquefaction risk factors.
Seismic Zone
Zone II
Lower risk zone preferred
Risk Level
Low-Medium
Low preferred
Liquefaction
Low
Low preferred
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Seismic Zone Zone II II preferred
Info
Risk Level Low-Medium Low preferred
Info
PGA (475yr) 0.0155g Lower preferred
Info
💡 What does this mean for you?Lower seismic hazard reduces structural and insurance risk exposure.

🌡️ Land Surface Temp

Final Score: 54.3/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Land Surface Temp?Land Surface Temperature reflects heat-island intensity from satellite thermal bands.
LST Mean
31.4°C
Lower better
LST Min
23.0°C
Context
LST Max
40.7°C
Lower better
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
LST Mean 31.4°C 20°C best / 45°C worst
Weighted by formula
LST Score 54.3 0-100
Computed
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
LST Mean (°C) 32.1 30.8 31.4
LST Min (°C) 25.6 20.5 23.0
LST Max (°C) 41.3 40.1 40.7
LST Score 51.8 56.8 54.3
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher heat exposure affects comfort, cooling load and health risk.

🏗️ Built-up Density

Final Score: 18.1/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Built-up Density?Built-up density measures extent of developed surface versus open space.
Built-up %
81.9%
Lower better
Open Space %
18.1%
Higher better
Built-up Score
18.1
0-100
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Built-up % 81.9% Inverse scoring
Score = 100 - builtup%
Open Space % 18.1% Context
Info
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Built-up % 87.3% 76.6% 81.9%
Open Space % 12.7% 23.4% 18.1%
Built-up Score 12.7 23.4 18.1
💡 What does this mean for you?Very high built-up often raises heat and runoff while reducing open environmental buffers.

💡 Night-time Lights

Final Score: 72.7/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Night-time Lights?Nighttime lights are a proxy for economic activity and electrification intensity.
Avg Radiance
36.34
Higher better
Max Radiance
57.62
Context
NTL Score
72.7
0-100
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Avg Radiance 36.34 Scaled to 50
Score = min(100, avg/50*100)
NTL Score 72.7 0-100
Computed
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Avg Radiance 41.52 31.17 36.34
Max Radiance 65.95 49.30 57.62
NTL Score 83.0 62.3 72.7
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher radiance often indicates stronger urban activity but can correlate with light pollution.

🏞️ Water Bodies

Final Score: 50.0/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Water Bodies?Water-bodies score reflects permanent and seasonal water presence in the analysis radius.
Permanent Water
35.32%
Higher generally better
Seasonal Water
48.91%
Context
Water Score
100.0
0-100
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Permanent Water % 35.32% 70% weight
Scaled against 10%
Seasonal Water % 48.91% 30% weight
Scaled against 20%
Water Score 100.0 0-100
Computed
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Permanent Water % 0.00% 70.63% 35.32%
Seasonal Water % 0.00% 97.82% 48.91%
Water Score 0.0 100.0 100.0
💡 What does this mean for you?Water presence can support cooling, recharge and ecological quality.

👥 Population Density

Final Score: 60.5/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Population Density?Population density indicates urban crowding pressure around the area.
Population
128,286
Estimated residents
Density/km²
7,907.4
Lower better for this score
Score
60.5
0-100
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Density/km² 7,907.4 Inverse scale up to 20,000
Lower -> higher score
Score 60.5 0-100
Computed
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Population Total 23,822 232,750 128,286
Density / km² 7,582.8 8,231.9 7,907.4
Pop Density Score 62.1 58.8 60.5
💡 What does this mean for you?Extremely high density can increase pressure on services and mobility.

⛲ Groundwater

Final Score: 63.4/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Groundwater?Groundwater score combines moisture, recharge, drought and trend indicators.
Soil Moisture
133.351
Higher better
Recharge
0.81
Higher better
PDSI
3.02
Higher better
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Soil Moisture 133.351 30% weight
Scaled
Recharge 0.81 25% weight
Scaled
PDSI 3.02 20% weight
Scaled
SM Trend 0.0000 15% weight
Scaled
Precipitation 1,873.91 10% weight
Scaled
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Soil Moisture 133.446 133.257 133.351
Recharge Estimate 0.70 0.92 0.81
PDSI 3.02 3.02 3.02
Groundwater Score 63.4 63.4 63.4
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher score suggests better long-term aquifer and moisture support conditions.

🌧️ Waterlogging

↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Waterlogging?Waterlogging combines topography, imperviousness and wetness indices across nearby grid cells.
Grid Count
2
Sampled cells
Avg Susceptibility
49.6
Lower is safer
High Risk Grids
1
High / Very High
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTargetStatus
Avg Susceptibility 49.6 < 40
Concern
Avg Slope 3.72° > 1°
Good
Avg Impervious 92.1% < 70%
Concern
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher susceptibility and low slope increase monsoon water stagnation probability.

🚶 Walkability & Safety

↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Walkability & Safety?OSM amenity metrics reflect pedestrian, safety and urban accessibility infrastructure.
Footpaths
0
Higher better
Street Lamps
0
Higher better
Police/Fire Access
1
Presence
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Footpaths (500m) 0 ≥ 3
Concern
Sidewalk Roads (1km) 0 ≥ 5
Concern
Nearest Police Station 1,838 m ≤ 2000m
Context
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher OSM accessibility/safety features generally improve everyday livability.

🌬️ Air Quality: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🛣️ Infrastructure: Infrastructure Score Formula

Formula: Composite weighted model from GHSL/ESA/VIIRS/Terrain features
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Urbanization index100.0020%SMOD
Built-up balance81.9%15%Best in moderate band
NTL stability69.0%15%Power/activity consistency
Avg building height10.59 m10%Vertical infra proxy
Impervious %45.1%10%Moderate is optimal
Radiance36.1710%Development proxy
Slope0.10°10%Flatter is better
Green support12.5%10%Tree + grass contribution
This is the same weighted structure used in Livability Infrastructure model.
Final: 81.73 / 100

🏥 Amenities: Amenity Score Breakdown

Formula: Each amenity category is capped at 100, final score is averaged across categories
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Hospitals 500m3 * 33Cap 100Health access
Schools 1km9 * 20Cap 100Education access
Markets 1km8 * 33Cap 100Daily needs
Parks 500m0 * 33Cap 100Open space
Transit 1km2 * 50Cap 100Mobility
Category multipliers mirror the Livability snapshot logic.
Final: Final from amenity_scores table

🌳 Green Cover: Green Score Formula

Formula: Score = (NDVI*40%) + (Vegetation*30%) + (Dense Green*20%) + (Parks*10%)
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
NDVI component0.164 => 32.840%13.1
Vegetation component16.1% => 16.130%4.8
Dense green component6.3% => 12.620%2.5
Parks component0 => 0.010%0.0
This matches the Livability GreenCover model weighting logic.
Final: 20.46 / 100

🌊 Flood Risk: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🏚️ Earthquake Risk: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🌡️ Land Surface Temp: LST Score Formula

Formula: Score = ((45 - LST Mean) / 25) * 100, clipped to [0,100]
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
LST Mean31.43 °CReference20°C best, 45°C worst
Lower land surface temperature means better livability.
Final: 54.28 / 100

🏗️ Built-up Density: Built-up Score Formula

Formula: Score = 100 - Built-up %
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Built-up %81.9%InverseLower is better
Dense concrete surfaces reduce infiltration and increase heat islands.
Final: 18.07 / 100

💡 Night-time Lights: Night-time Lights Formula

Formula: Score = min(100, (Avg Radiance / 50) * 100)
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Avg Radiance36.34Scale 0-50Higher indicates activity
Higher night radiance generally tracks electrification and economic intensity.
Final: 72.69 / 100

🏞️ Water Bodies: Water Bodies Score Formula

Formula: Score = (Permanent Water Score * 70%) + (Seasonal Water Score * 30%)
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Permanent water35.32%70%Scaled against 10% benchmark
Seasonal water48.91%30%Scaled against 20% benchmark
Permanent water has higher score weight than seasonal water.
Final: 100.00 / 100

👥 Population Density: Population Density Formula

Formula: Score = ((20000 - density_per_km²) / 20000) * 100, clipped to [0,100]
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Density7,907.4 /km²Inverse scaleLower density -> higher score
This follows the Livability PopulationDensity model.
Final: 60.46 / 100

⛲ Groundwater: Groundwater Score Formula

Formula: Weighted: Soil Moisture 30% + Recharge 25% + PDSI 20% + Trend 15% + Precipitation 10%
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Soil moisture133.35130%Scaled to 0-200
Recharge estimate0.8125%Scaled -200 to +400
PDSI3.0220%Scaled -4 to +4
SM trend0.000015%Scaled -50 to +50
Precipitation1,873.9110%Scaled 800 to 1800
Exactly reused from Livability Groundwater model logic.
Final: 63.41 / 100

🌧️ Waterlogging: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🚶 Walkability & Safety: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

View full livability report for Modha Para →

Compliance Status

RERA registration, filings, and compliance flags based on public CG-RERA records.

Compliance Status Based on public CG-RERA records
3 Passed
1 Issue(s)
2 N/A
RERA Registration Active
Reg No. PCGRERA040718000444 — Status: Ongoing
Section 3 · Source · RERA Official Page
No Penalty Orders
3 order(s) on record, none with penalty sections (Sec 38/39/40/59/61/63)
Sec 38–63 · Source
No Recent Orders
No orders filed in the last 12 months (older: 3)
Source
Completion Overdue
Was due 24 Feb 2019 — overdue by ~88 month(s)
Section 4 · Source
Quarterly Updates Not Available
No compliance snapshot data on record
Section 11 · Source
Annual Audit Not Available
No compliance snapshot data on record
Section 4(2)(l)(D) · Source
Each check is based on publicly available CG-RERA portal data as of May 2026. How this works →

Details

Registration, professional team, bank, promoters, and compliance history.

Registration Details
RERA Number
PCGRERA040718000444
Status
Ongoing
Project Type
Mixed Development
Approved Date
04 Jul 2018
Original End Date
24 Feb 2019
EWS Category
NO
Construction Cost
₹ 202348000
Land Cost
₹ 7000000
Proposed Completion
24 Feb 2019
Authorised Person
rakesh kumar agrawal
View on Map
Promoters
R
R.A. REAL ESTATE PVT.LTD, THRU-RAKESH KUMAR AGRAWAL
R
R.A. REAL ESTATE PVT.LTD Company
R
R.A. REAL ESTATE PVT.LTD
R
R.A. REAL ESTATE PVT. LTD. THROUGH DIRECTOR SHRI RAKESH AGRAWAL

Buildings & Units

Inventory overview, sold/unsold breakdown, and building details.

No unit data available yet.
Run the RERA detail scraper to populate this section.

Legal Orders & Cases

RERA legal orders, complaints, and case statistics filed against this project.

3
Total Cases
0
Last 12 Months
3
Older Cases
3
PDFs Available
Legal Orders (3)
ComplaintApplicantSectionDateSourcePDF
SM-EXP-2024-02317 CG-RERA - 08 May 2024 This project
M-PRO-2019-00686 SMT NIDHI SINGH, W/O SHRI JITENDRA PRASAD SINGH Section 11 04 Feb 2020 This project
M-COM-2019-00455 CG-RERA - 07 May 2019 This project

Location

Project address, coordinates, and nearby places.

Location Details
Address
dr. bhimrao ambedkar, ward no. 27, raipur (c.g.)
District
Raipur
Tehsil
Raipur
Coordinates
21.2492582, 81.6410921 View on Map
Area Livability

Livability of Modha Para Raipur

Environmental, infrastructure & amenity parameters for the area where this project is located (0.33 km from project). Each value is compared with the Raipur average.

Composite Livability Score
62.6 / 100
Grade B · Average
+3.7 vs Raipur avg (58.9)
Air Quality
98.4 Excellent
Area
98
City
99
-0.2 vs city avg
Water Quality
— No data
Area
—
City
68
No comparison data
Sanitation
— No data
Area
—
City
56
No comparison data
Green Cover
23.4 Poor
Area
23
City
39
-15.1 vs city avg
Noise Level
— No data
Area
—
City
58
No comparison data
Infrastructure
81.3 Excellent
Area
81
City
76
+5.1 vs city avg
Amenities
90.8 Excellent
Area
91
City
82
+9.0 vs city avg
Flood Safety
55.0 Average
Area
55
City
38
+16.9 vs city avg
Earthquake Safety
25.0 Poor
Area
25
City
15
+10.4 vs city avg
Land Surface Temp.
54.3 Average
Area
54
City
58
-3.5 vs city avg
Built-up Density
18.1 Poor
Area
18
City
35
-16.7 vs city avg
Night-light Activity
72.7 Good
Area
73
City
55
+18.0 vs city avg
Water Bodies Nearby
50.0 Average
Area
50
City
93
-42.7 vs city avg
Population Density
60.5 Average
Area
60
City
68
-7.4 vs city avg
Groundwater Status
63.4 Average
Area
63
City
63
+0.0 vs city avg
View detailed livability report for Modha Para
Neighborhood Intelligence

Explore nearby infrastructure around this project. Toggle categories to show/hide on the map.

Neighborhood Map 3 km radius
RERA Projects Near crosswinds 22 found within 3 km
# Project District Status Distance
1 ANAND ARCADE Raipur Ongoing 0.48 km
2 PMAY OF 58 DUS AT NEAR DKS PARISAR ,RAIPUR Raipur Ongoing 0.66 km
3 PITHALIA PLAZA Raipur Ongoing 0.78 km
4 RAHEJA TOWER Raipur Ongoing 0.82 km
5 METROPOLIS Raipur Ongoing 0.87 km
6 RAJARIA INDUSTRIAL EUIPMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED Raipur Ongoing 1.10 km
7 AKANKSHA PARISAR Raipur Ongoing 1.46 km
8 BRIGHT ENCLAVE Raipur Ongoing 1.57 km
9 LALGANGA MIDAS Raipur Ongoing 1.62 km
10 SIMRAN HEIGHTS Raipur Ongoing 1.62 km
11 KAVISH ENCLAVE Raipur New 1.76 km
12 C.G. ELITE Raipur Ongoing 1.78 km
13 merlin jayshree vihar (phase-ii) Raipur Ongoing 1.98 km
14 GOLDEN SANDS Raipur Ongoing 2.21 km
15 OFFICE CUM RESIDENTIAL COMPLEX Raipur New 2.22 km
16 SLT WATER FRONT Raipur Ongoing 2.24 km
17 JEEVAN PARISAR Raipur Ongoing 2.36 km
18 USHA ESTATES Raipur New 2.38 km
19 ASHOKA IMPRESSION PHASE - 2 Raipur Ongoing 2.47 km
20 GULMOHAR PARK Raipur Ongoing 2.59 km
21 SAMRAJYA RESIDENCY Raipur New 2.66 km
22 pmay of 280(dus) at kata chirhuldih ,raipur Raipur Ongoing 2.84 km

Buyer Checklist

Documents and verifications a buyer should review before purchase.

Buyer Document Verification Checklist

Key documents a buyer should verify before purchasing in this project. Items marked Available have data on Seemankan.

2/14 verified
  • RERA Registration Certificate Available
    Confirms the project is registered with RERA CG. Verify registration number, validity dates, and project details on the RERA portal.
    RERA No: PCGRERA040718000444
    View on RERA Portal
  • Promoter Registration Certificate Verify Independently
    Builder / colonizer company registration certificate. Confirms the promoter entity is a registered firm, company, or society.
  • Approved Building / Sanction Plan Verify Independently
    Building plan sanctioned by the local authority. Verify floor count, setbacks, and FSI compliance.
  • Layout Plan Verify Independently
    Approved layout showing plot divisions, roads, open spaces, and common areas.
  • Title Deed / Ownership Proof Verify Independently
    Proof that the promoter legally owns the land. Verify via Sub-Registrar records.
  • Encumbrance Certificate Verify Independently
    Confirms the property is free from legal dues, mortgages, or liens. Obtain from Sub-Registrar office.
  • Land Use / Diversion Certificate Verify Independently
    Required if land was converted from agricultural to non-agricultural use.
  • Architect Certificate Verify Independently
    Certification from a registered architect confirming structural plans and compliance.
  • Structural Engineer Certificate Verify Independently
    Certification from a structural engineer confirming building safety and load-bearing capacity.
  • CA Financial Certificate Verify Independently
    Chartered Accountant certificate on financial status, project cost estimates, and fund utilization.
  • Commencement Certificate Verify Independently
    Permission to begin construction issued by the local authority after plan approval.
  • NOCs (No Objection Certificates) Verify Independently
    NOCs from fire department, environment, water supply, electricity board, and other authorities.
  • Project Brochure / Specification Verify Independently
    Official brochure with unit types, amenities, and specifications. Compare with actual delivery.
  • RERA Compliance Orders Available
    Check if any orders, penalties, or directions have been issued against this project by RERA.
    3 order(s) on record — review in Legal tab
Disclaimer: This checklist is for informational purposes only. "Available" means Seemankan has a copy from the RERA portal — it does not constitute legal verification. Always verify original documents with the concerned authorities and consult a legal advisor before making a purchase decision.

Risk Zone Within 5 km

Buffer zones (water bodies, airport restrictions) and risk sites (landfills, waste processing) detected within 3 km (immediate) and 5 km (extended) of the project.

29
Risk zones (within 5 km)
3 km: 14 3–5 km: 15
27
Water bodies (river/nala/lake)
3 km: 14 3–5 km: 13
2
Landfill / waste sites
3 km: 0 3–5 km: 2
0
Airport buffer overlap
3 km: 0 3–5 km: 0
Risk Zone Map (3 km & 5 km rings) Project marker centered
Water Bodies (27)
  • Amanaka Talab ≤3 km
    Tank · 50m buffer
    0.81 km
  • Kankali Talab ≤3 km
    Tank · 50m buffer
    0.83 km
  • Kharun River ≤3 km
    River · 75m buffer
    1.44 km
  • Maharajband Talab ≤3 km
    Tank · 50m buffer
    1.58 km
  • Muktangan Talab ≤3 km
    Tank · 50m buffer
    1.58 km
  • Devpuri Nala ≤3 km
    Nala · 20m buffer
    1.67 km
  • Shankar Nagar Nala ≤3 km
    Nala · 20m buffer
    1.84 km
  • Budha Talab (Vivekananda Sarovar) ≤3 km
    Lake · 50m buffer
    2.09 km
Landfill / Waste Sites (2)
  • SLRM Centre Tendua (Tundra) 3–5 km
    Waste processing · 200m buffer
    3.32 km
  • Daldal Seoni MSW Transfer Station 3–5 km
    Transfer station · 100m buffer
    4.99 km

Reviews

Verified buyer reviews and ratings for this project.

No reviews yet. Be the first to review this project!

Login to Write a Review

You need to be signed in to submit a review for this project.

Login or Register