Home / RERA Projects / ANANTA
NEW Residential Plotted Development RERA Page Project Website
GENERATE REPORT

ANANTA

Compliance Status
Partial Compliance
21.2324, 81.6947 Explore area
District
Raipur
Area
—
Promoter
VIKRUTI INFRASTURCTURES PRIVATE LIMITED
Project Information
Promoter VIKRUTI INFRASTURCTURES PRIVATE LIMITED
Type Residential Plotted Development
Status New
Completion 01 Aug 2024
RERA No. PCGRERA100920001141
Registered 10 Sep 2020
Original End 01 May 2024
Total Units 30 · 17 sold
EWS Category NO
Construction Cost ₹ 366140000
Land Cost ₹ 287414000
Authorised Person RAMESH AGRAWAL
Website www.ananta.com
Address Near Agrasen Dham, Labhandih, Raipur (C.G.)
At a Glance
30
Total Units
17
Units Sold
13
Unsold
1
Legal Cases
Aug 2024
Target Completion
100%
Completion
Amenities & Facilities (213)
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
BOUNDARY WALL
50%
BOUNDARY WALL
80%
BOUNDARY WALL
80%
BOUNDARY WALL
85%
BOUNDARY WALL
85%
BOUNDARY WALL
90%
BOUNDARY WALL
95%
BOUNDARY WALL
95%
BOUNDARY WALL
95%
BOUNDARY WALL
95%
BOUNDARY WALL
95%
BOUNDARY WALL
100%
BOUNDARY WALL
100%
CLUB HOUSE
45%
CLUB HOUSE
50%
CLUB HOUSE
55%
CLUB HOUSE
60%
CLUB HOUSE
70%
CLUB HOUSE
70%
CLUB HOUSE
80%
CLUB HOUSE
90%
CLUB HOUSE
90%
COMMUNITY BUILDINGS
30%
COMMUNITY BUILDINGS
45%
COMMUNITY BUILDINGS
50%
COMMUNITY BUILDINGS
55%
COMMUNITY BUILDINGS
60%
COMMUNITY BUILDINGS
70%
COMMUNITY BUILDINGS
70%
COMMUNITY BUILDINGS
80%
COMMUNITY BUILDINGS
90%
COMMUNITY BUILDINGS
90%
COMMUNITY BUILDINGS/ CLUB HOUSE
10%
COMMUNITY BUILDINGS/ CLUB HOUSE
30%
COMMUNITY BUILDINGS/ CLUB HOUSE
30%
COMMUNITY BUILDINGS/ CLUB HOUSE
40%
ELECTRIC METER ROOM,SUB STATION,RECIEVING STATIOM
0%
GYM
45%
GYM
50%
GYM
55%
GYM
60%
GYM
70%
GYM
70%
GYM
80%
GYM
90%
GYM
90%
INTERNAL ROADS AND FOOTPATHS
40%
INTERNAL ROADS AND FOOTPATHS
60%
INTERNAL ROADS AND FOOTPATHS
65%
INTERNAL ROADS AND FOOTPATHS
75%
INTERNAL ROADS AND FOOTPATHS
80%
INTERNAL ROADS AND FOOTPATHS
80%
INTERNAL ROADS AND FOOTPATHS
85%
INTERNAL ROADS AND FOOTPATHS
85%
INTERNAL ROADS AND FOOTPATHS
85%
INTERNAL ROADS AND FOOTPATHS
85%
INTERNAL ROADS AND FOOTPATHS
85%
INTERNAL ROADS AND FOOTPATHS
95%
INTERNAL ROADS AND FOOTPATHS
95%
LANDSCAPING AND TREE PLANTING
0%
LANDSCAPING AND TREE PLANTING
10%
LANDSCAPING AND TREE PLANTING
10%
LANDSCAPING AND TREE PLANTING
20%
LANDSCAPING AND TREE PLANTING
40%
LANDSCAPING AND TREE PLANTING
50%
LANDSCAPING AND TREE PLANTING
65%
LANDSCAPING AND TREE PLANTING
75%
LANDSCAPING AND TREE PLANTING
80%
LANDSCAPING AND TREE PLANTING
85%
LANDSCAPING AND TREE PLANTING
95%
LANDSCAPING AND TREE PLANTING
98%
LANDSCAPING AND TREE PLANTING
98%
NA
0%
na
0%
na
0%
na
0%
na
0%
na
0%
na
0%
OPEN PARKING
0%
OPEN PARKING
10%
OPEN PARKING
30%
OPEN PARKING
30%
OPEN PARKING
35%
OPEN PARKING
45%
OPEN PARKING
60%
OPEN PARKING
70%
OPEN PARKING
80%
OPEN PARKING
90%
OPEN PARKING
100%
OPEN PARKING
100%
PLACE OF WORSHIP
45%
PLACE OF WORSHIP
50%
PLACE OF WORSHIP
55%
PLACE OF WORSHIP
60%
PLACE OF WORSHIP
70%
PLACE OF WORSHIP
70%
PLACE OF WORSHIP
80%
PLACE OF WORSHIP
90%
PLACE OF WORSHIP
90%
SECURITY SERVICE
0%
SECURITY SERVICE
0%
SECURITY SERVICE
0%
SECURITY SERVICE
0%
SECURITY SERVICE
0%
SECURITY SERVICE
0%
SECURITY SERVICE
0%
SECURITY SERVICE
0%
SECURITY SERVICE
0%
SECURITY SERVICE
0%
SECURITY SERVICE
0%
SECURITY SERVICE
0%
SEWERAGE
20%
SEWERAGE
70%
SEWERAGE
80%
SEWERAGE
80%
SEWERAGE
80%
SEWERAGE
80%
SEWERAGE
85%
SEWERAGE
85%
SEWERAGE
85%
SEWERAGE
90%
SEWERAGE
90%
SEWERAGE
95%
SEWERAGE
95%
SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT AND DISPOSAL
0%
SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT AND DISPOSAL
0%
SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT AND DISPOSAL
20%
SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT AND DISPOSAL
0%
SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT AND DISPOSAL
0%
SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT AND DISPOSAL
0%
SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT AND DISPOSAL
0%
SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT AND DISPOSAL
0%
SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT AND DISPOSAL
0%
SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT AND DISPOSAL
0%
SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT AND DISPOSAL
0%
SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT AND DISPOSAL
0%
STORM WATER DRAINS
30%
STORM WATER DRAINS
70%
STORM WATER DRAINS
80%
STORM WATER DRAINS
80%
STORM WATER DRAINS
80%
STORM WATER DRAINS
80%
STORM WATER DRAINS
85%
STORM WATER DRAINS
85%
STORM WATER DRAINS
85%
STORM WATER DRAINS
90%
STORM WATER DRAINS
90%
STORM WATER DRAINS
100%
STORM WATER DRAINS
100%
STREET LIGHTING
10%
STREET LIGHTING
20%
STREET LIGHTING
20%
STREET LIGHTING
40%
STREET LIGHTING
40%
STREET LIGHTING
45%
STREET LIGHTING
55%
STREET LIGHTING
55%
STREET LIGHTING
60%
STREET LIGHTING
60%
STREET LIGHTING
80%
STREET LIGHTING
95%
STREET LIGHTING
95%
SWIMMING POOL
45%
SWIMMING POOL
50%
SWIMMING POOL
55%
SWIMMING POOL
60%
SWIMMING POOL
70%
SWIMMING POOL
70%
SWIMMING POOL
80%
SWIMMING POOL
90%
SWIMMING POOL
90%
TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL OF SEWERAGE AND SULLAGE WAT
80%
TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL OF SEWERAGE AND SULLAGE WAT
60%
TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL OF SEWERAGE AND SULLAGE WAT
70%
TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL OF SEWERAGE AND SULLAGE WAT
70%
TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL OF SEWERAGE AND SULLAGE WAT
75%
TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL OF SEWERAGE AND SULLAGE WAT
75%
TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL OF SEWERAGE AND SULLAGE WAT
75%
TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL OF SEWERAGE AND SULLAGE WAT
80%
TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL OF SEWERAGE AND SULLAGE WAT
80%
TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL OF SEWERAGE AND SULLAGE WAT
80%
TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL OF SEWERAGE AND SULLAGE WAT
80%
WATER CONSERVATION RAIN WATER HARVESTING
20%
WATER CONSERVATION RAIN WATER HARVESTING
80%
WATER CONSERVATION RAIN WATER HARVESTING
80%
WATER CONSERVATION RAIN WATER HARVESTING
80%
WATER CONSERVATION RAIN WATER HARVESTING
80%
WATER CONSERVATION RAIN WATER HARVESTING
80%
WATER CONSERVATION RAIN WATER HARVESTING
85%
WATER CONSERVATION RAIN WATER HARVESTING
85%
WATER CONSERVATION RAIN WATER HARVESTING
85%
WATER CONSERVATION RAIN WATER HARVESTING
90%
WATER CONSERVATION RAIN WATER HARVESTING
100%
WATER CONSERVATION RAIN WATER HARVESTING
100%
WATER CONSERVATION RAIN WATER HARVESTING
100%
WATER SUPPLY
0%
WATER SUPPLY
0%
WATER SUPPLY
0%
WATER SUPPLY
0%
WATER SUPPLY
60%
WATER SUPPLY
70%
WATER SUPPLY
75%
WATER SUPPLY
75%
WATER SUPPLY
80%
WATER SUPPLY
80%
WATER SUPPLY
80%
WATER SUPPLY
80%
WATER SUPPLY
80%
Project Professionals
CA SANSKAR AGRAWAL
STATUTORY CA
PRATIK PRADEEP UMALE
QUARTERLY CA
HARISH MESHRAM
ENGINEER
VIVEK SINGH RATHORE
ARCHITECT
Project Analysis

360° Project Intelligence

Comprehensive analysis across regulatory, livability, market, filing activity, and market readiness dimensions.

Regulatory
79
11 of 14 checks · Moderate Signals
Livability
62
Magneto Zone · Moderate Signals
Legal
1
1 legal order(s) · 30 nearby
Filing Activity
281
239 docs · 42 quarterly updates
Market Readiness
25
New · due Aug 2024
Area Livability

Livability of Magneto Zone

Eighteen environmental, infrastructure and amenity parameters for the nearest mapped area (Magneto Zone — 1.43 km from this project). Click any parameter for the underlying readings, thresholds and what they mean.



🏠 Livability Parameters

Latest readings for Magneto Zone. Only parameters with available data are shown below. Based on the latest readings for Magneto Zone.

B
Composite Score
62.4 /100
Good

🌬️ Air Quality

Final Score: 97.6/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Air Quality?AQI summarizes PM2.5, PM10 and gases. Lower pollution values improve public health outcomes.
AQI
56
Satisfactory
PM2.5
30.7 µg/m³
≤ 40
PM10
85.6 µg/m³
≤ 60
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
PM2.5 30.7 µg/m³ ≤ 40
Good
PM10 85.6 µg/m³ ≤ 60
Concern
NO₂ 19.8 µg/m³ ≤ 40
Good
💡 What does this mean for you?Cleaner air lowers respiratory burden and improves outdoor comfort.

💧 Water Quality

Final Score: 63.3/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Water Quality?Water quality combines chemistry, supply duration and contamination markers.
TDS
414 ppm
≤ 500
pH
7.18
6.5–8.5
Supply
4.5 hr/day
≥ 8 hr
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
TDS 414 ppm ≤ 500
Good
Fluoride 0.92 mg/L ≤ 1.0
Good
Turbidity 5.2 NTU ≤ 1
Concern
💡 What does this mean for you?Better supply quality and consistency reduces dependence on tanker/groundwater fallback.

🧹 Sanitation

Final Score: 83.9/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Sanitation?Sanitation reflects ODF status, sewage treatment and waste management regularity.
ODF
ODF++
ODF++
Sewage Coverage
78%
≥ 80%
Drainage
82%
≥ 90%
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
ODF Status ODF++ ODF++
Info
Sewage Coverage 78% ≥ 80%
Concern
Drainage Coverage 82% ≥ 90%
Concern
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher sanitation maturity lowers disease exposure and neighborhood nuisance.

🛣️ Infrastructure

Final Score: 71.5/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Infrastructure?Infrastructure score combines land use, urbanization, built form, night lights and terrain indicators.
Built-up
38.0%
Balanced band
Tree Cover
24.1%
≥ 15%
Urbanization
94.3
Higher better
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Built-up (LULC) 38.0% 40-70%
Contextual
Impervious Surface 16.4% < 70%
Good
NDVI Mean 0.310 > 0.3
Good
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Built-up (LULC) % 34.7% 41.4% 38.0%
Tree Cover % 31.7% 16.5% 24.1%
Urbanization Index 100.0 88.6 94.3
Infra Score 74.0 69.0 71.9
💡 What does this mean for you?Balanced built + green mix usually improves long-term livability resilience.

🏥 Amenities

Final Score: 81.7/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Amenities?Amenity score captures daily-access services in walk/short-drive radii.
Hospitals 500m
0
Target ≥1
Schools 1km
11
Target ≥3
Parks 500m
0
Target ≥1
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Hospitals (500m) 0 ≥1
Concern
Schools (1km) 11 ≥3
Good
Markets (1km) 8 ≥1
Good
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher local amenity density improves convenience and walkability.

🌳 Green Cover

Final Score: 25.5/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Green Cover?NDVI and vegetation structure are measured from satellite imagery to estimate neighborhood greenery.
NDVI Mean
0.199
Greenness index
Vegetation
14.4%
% green pixels
Dense Green
4.5%
Thick canopy
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
NDVI Mean 0.199 0.5 maps to score 100
Weighted 40%
Vegetation % 14.4% Direct % (cap 100)
Weighted 30%
Dense Green % 4.5% Scaled from 50%
Weighted 20%
Parks within 500m 0 Count * 33 (cap 100)
Weighted 10%
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
NDVI Mean 0.166 0.231 0.199
Vegetation % 14.8% 14.0% 14.4%
Dense Green % 2.0% 7.1% 4.5%
Tree Canopy % 8.5% 12.4% 10.5%
Green Score 18.5 25.5 22.1
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher green metrics typically reduce heat stress and improve comfort.

🔊 Noise

Final Score: 61.6/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Noise?Noise uses measured day/night dB compared to CPCB zone limits.
Day dB
50.7
vs CPCB day limit
Night dB
48.8
vs CPCB night limit
Zone
CPCB class
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Day Noise 50.7 dB ≤ 65.0 dB
Good
Night Noise 48.8 dB ≤ 55.0 dB
Good
Nearest Highway 1,028 m Higher usually quieter
Info
💡 What does this mean for you?Chronic high noise impacts stress, sleep quality and perceived comfort.

🌊 Flood Risk

Final Score: 55.0/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Flood Risk?Flood risk combines river exposure and local waterlogging vulnerability.
Overall Risk
High
Lower is safer
River Risk
Medium
Lower is safer
Waterlogging
High
Lower is safer
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Overall Risk High Low preferred
Info
River Flood Risk Medium Low preferred
Info
Waterlogging Risk High Low preferred
Info
💡 What does this mean for you?Lower flood risk means less disruption and lower hazard exposure.

🏚️ Earthquake Risk

Final Score: 25.0/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Earthquake Risk?Earthquake profile uses seismic zone, PGA and soil/liquefaction risk factors.
Seismic Zone
Zone II
Lower risk zone preferred
Risk Level
Low-Medium
Low preferred
Liquefaction
Low
Low preferred
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Seismic Zone Zone II II preferred
Info
Risk Level Low-Medium Low preferred
Info
PGA (475yr) 0.0155g Lower preferred
Info
💡 What does this mean for you?Lower seismic hazard reduces structural and insurance risk exposure.

🌡️ Land Surface Temp

Final Score: 64.0/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Land Surface Temp?Land Surface Temperature reflects heat-island intensity from satellite thermal bands.
LST Mean
29.0°C
Lower better
LST Min
2.5°C
Context
LST Max
40.6°C
Lower better
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
LST Mean 29.0°C 20°C best / 45°C worst
Weighted by formula
LST Score 64.0 0-100
Computed
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
LST Mean (°C) 29.1 28.9 29.0
LST Min (°C) 3.1 1.9 2.5
LST Max (°C) 40.8 40.4 40.6
LST Score 63.6 64.4 64.0
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher heat exposure affects comfort, cooling load and health risk.

🏗️ Built-up Density

Final Score: 62.0/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Built-up Density?Built-up density measures extent of developed surface versus open space.
Built-up %
38.0%
Lower better
Open Space %
62.0%
Higher better
Built-up Score
62.0
0-100
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Built-up % 38.0% Inverse scoring
Score = 100 - builtup%
Open Space % 62.0% Context
Info
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Built-up % 34.7% 41.4% 38.0%
Open Space % 65.3% 58.6% 62.0%
Built-up Score 65.3 58.6 62.0
💡 What does this mean for you?Very high built-up often raises heat and runoff while reducing open environmental buffers.

💡 Night-time Lights

Final Score: 52.2/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Night-time Lights?Nighttime lights are a proxy for economic activity and electrification intensity.
Avg Radiance
26.08
Higher better
Max Radiance
38.69
Context
NTL Score
52.2
0-100
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Avg Radiance 26.08 Scaled to 50
Score = min(100, avg/50*100)
NTL Score 52.2 0-100
Computed
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Avg Radiance 29.16 23.00 26.08
Max Radiance 41.75 35.62 38.69
NTL Score 58.3 46.0 52.2
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher radiance often indicates stronger urban activity but can correlate with light pollution.

🏞️ Water Bodies

Final Score: 50.0/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Water Bodies?Water-bodies score reflects permanent and seasonal water presence in the analysis radius.
Permanent Water
31.26%
Higher generally better
Seasonal Water
48.16%
Context
Water Score
100.0
0-100
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Permanent Water % 31.26% 70% weight
Scaled against 10%
Seasonal Water % 48.16% 30% weight
Scaled against 20%
Water Score 100.0 0-100
Computed
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Permanent Water % 0.00% 62.52% 31.26%
Seasonal Water % 0.00% 96.32% 48.16%
Water Score 0.0 100.0 100.0
💡 What does this mean for you?Water presence can support cooling, recharge and ecological quality.

👥 Population Density

Final Score: 80.1/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Population Density?Population density indicates urban crowding pressure around the area.
Population
61,384
Estimated residents
Density/km²
3,984.0
Lower better for this score
Score
80.1
0-100
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Density/km² 3,984.0 Inverse scale up to 20,000
Lower -> higher score
Score 80.1 0-100
Computed
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Population Total 12,815 109,952 61,384
Density / km² 4,079.2 3,888.7 3,984.0
Pop Density Score 79.6 80.6 80.1
💡 What does this mean for you?Extremely high density can increase pressure on services and mobility.

⛲ Groundwater

Final Score: 63.9/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Groundwater?Groundwater score combines moisture, recharge, drought and trend indicators.
Soil Moisture
136.274
Higher better
Recharge
1.19
Higher better
PDSI
3.01
Higher better
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Soil Moisture 136.274 30% weight
Scaled
Recharge 1.19 25% weight
Scaled
PDSI 3.01 20% weight
Scaled
SM Trend 0.0000 15% weight
Scaled
Precipitation 1,866.01 10% weight
Scaled
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Soil Moisture 136.483 136.065 136.274
Recharge Estimate 0.90 1.49 1.19
PDSI 3.00 3.02 3.01
Groundwater Score 63.8 63.9 63.9
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher score suggests better long-term aquifer and moisture support conditions.

🌧️ Waterlogging

↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Waterlogging?Waterlogging combines topography, imperviousness and wetness indices across nearby grid cells.
Grid Count
28
Sampled cells
Avg Susceptibility
49.8
Lower is safer
High Risk Grids
10
High / Very High
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTargetStatus
Avg Susceptibility 49.8 < 40
Concern
Avg Slope 2.74° > 1°
Good
Avg Impervious 24.3% < 70%
Good
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher susceptibility and low slope increase monsoon water stagnation probability.

🚶 Walkability & Safety

↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Walkability & Safety?OSM amenity metrics reflect pedestrian, safety and urban accessibility infrastructure.
Footpaths
0
Higher better
Street Lamps
0
Higher better
Police/Fire Access
0
Presence
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Footpaths (500m) 0 ≥ 3
Concern
Sidewalk Roads (1km) 0 ≥ 5
Concern
Nearest Police Station — m ≤ 2000m
Context
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher OSM accessibility/safety features generally improve everyday livability.

🌬️ Air Quality: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

💧 Water Quality: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🧹 Sanitation: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🛣️ Infrastructure: Infrastructure Score Formula

Formula: Composite weighted model from GHSL/ESA/VIIRS/Terrain features
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Urbanization index94.3120%SMOD
Built-up balance38.0%15%Best in moderate band
NTL stability70.0%15%Power/activity consistency
Avg building height5.63 m10%Vertical infra proxy
Impervious %16.4%10%Moderate is optimal
Radiance26.2610%Development proxy
Slope0.10°10%Flatter is better
Green support24.1%10%Tree + grass contribution
This is the same weighted structure used in Livability Infrastructure model.
Final: 71.86 / 100

🏥 Amenities: Amenity Score Breakdown

Formula: Each amenity category is capped at 100, final score is averaged across categories
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Hospitals 500m0 * 33Cap 100Health access
Schools 1km11 * 20Cap 100Education access
Markets 1km8 * 33Cap 100Daily needs
Parks 500m0 * 33Cap 100Open space
Transit 1km2 * 50Cap 100Mobility
Category multipliers mirror the Livability snapshot logic.
Final: Final from amenity_scores table

🌳 Green Cover: Green Score Formula

Formula: Score = (NDVI*40%) + (Vegetation*30%) + (Dense Green*20%) + (Parks*10%)
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
NDVI component0.199 => 39.840%15.9
Vegetation component14.4% => 14.430%4.3
Dense green component4.5% => 9.120%1.8
Parks component0 => 0.010%0.0
This matches the Livability GreenCover model weighting logic.
Final: 22.05 / 100

🔊 Noise: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🌊 Flood Risk: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🏚️ Earthquake Risk: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🌡️ Land Surface Temp: LST Score Formula

Formula: Score = ((45 - LST Mean) / 25) * 100, clipped to [0,100]
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
LST Mean29.00 °CReference20°C best, 45°C worst
Lower land surface temperature means better livability.
Final: 64.00 / 100

🏗️ Built-up Density: Built-up Score Formula

Formula: Score = 100 - Built-up %
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Built-up %38.0%InverseLower is better
Dense concrete surfaces reduce infiltration and increase heat islands.
Final: 61.98 / 100

💡 Night-time Lights: Night-time Lights Formula

Formula: Score = min(100, (Avg Radiance / 50) * 100)
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Avg Radiance26.08Scale 0-50Higher indicates activity
Higher night radiance generally tracks electrification and economic intensity.
Final: 52.16 / 100

🏞️ Water Bodies: Water Bodies Score Formula

Formula: Score = (Permanent Water Score * 70%) + (Seasonal Water Score * 30%)
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Permanent water31.26%70%Scaled against 10% benchmark
Seasonal water48.16%30%Scaled against 20% benchmark
Permanent water has higher score weight than seasonal water.
Final: 100.00 / 100

👥 Population Density: Population Density Formula

Formula: Score = ((20000 - density_per_km²) / 20000) * 100, clipped to [0,100]
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Density3,984.0 /km²Inverse scaleLower density -> higher score
This follows the Livability PopulationDensity model.
Final: 80.08 / 100

⛲ Groundwater: Groundwater Score Formula

Formula: Weighted: Soil Moisture 30% + Recharge 25% + PDSI 20% + Trend 15% + Precipitation 10%
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Soil moisture136.27430%Scaled to 0-200
Recharge estimate1.1925%Scaled -200 to +400
PDSI3.0120%Scaled -4 to +4
SM trend0.000015%Scaled -50 to +50
Precipitation1,866.0110%Scaled 800 to 1800
Exactly reused from Livability Groundwater model logic.
Final: 63.85 / 100

🌧️ Waterlogging: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🚶 Walkability & Safety: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

View full livability report for Magneto Zone →

Compliance Status

RERA registration, filings, and compliance flags based on public CG-RERA records.

Compliance Status Based on public CG-RERA records
2 Passed
1 Warning
1 Issue(s)
2 N/A
RERA Registration Active
Reg No. PCGRERA100920001141 — Status: New
Section 3 · Source · View Certificate · RERA Official Page
No Penalty Orders
1 order(s) on record, none with penalty sections (Sec 38/39/40/59/61/63)
Sec 38–63 · Source
1 Order(s) in Last 12 Months
Recent: SM-EXP-2025-03088
Source · SM-EXP-2025-03088
Completion Overdue
Was due 01 Aug 2024 — overdue by ~21 month(s)
Section 4 · Source
Quarterly Updates Not Available
No compliance snapshot data on record
Section 11 · Source
Annual Audit Not Available
No compliance snapshot data on record
Section 4(2)(l)(D) · Source
Each check is based on publicly available CG-RERA portal data as of Apr 2026. How this works →

Details

Registration, professional team, bank, promoters, and compliance history.

Registration Details
RERA Number
PCGRERA100920001141
Status
New
Project Type
Residential Plotted Development
Approved Date
10 Sep 2020
Original End Date
01 May 2024
EWS Category
NO
Construction Cost
₹ 366140000
Land Cost
₹ 287414000
Proposed Completion
01 Aug 2024
Authorised Person
RAMESH AGRAWAL
Website
www.ananta.com
View on Map
Professional Team
RoleNameLicense / Membership
Statutory CA CA SANSKAR AGRAWAL 429385
Quarterly CA PRATIK PRADEEP UMALE 438913
Engineer HARISH MESHRAM 1362/21
Architect VIVEK SINGH RATHORE CA/2001/28162
Promoters
V
VIKRUTI INFRASTURCTURES PRIVATE LIMITED Company
V
VIKRUTI INFRASTURCTURES PRIVATE LIMITED THROUGH - RAMESH AGRAWAL

Legal Orders & Cases

RERA legal orders, complaints, and case statistics filed against this project.

1
Total Cases
1
Last 12 Months
0
Older Cases
1
PDFs Available
Legal Orders (1)
ComplaintApplicantSectionDateSourcePDF
SM-EXP-2025-03088 CG-RERA - 13 Oct 2025 This project

Location

Project address, coordinates, and nearby places.

Location Details
Address
Near Agrasen Dham, Labhandih, Raipur (C.G.)
District
Raipur
Tehsil
Raipur
Coordinates
21.2323815, 81.6946702 View on Map
Neighborhood Intelligence

Explore nearby infrastructure around this project. Toggle categories to show/hide on the map.

Neighborhood Map 3 km radius
RERA Projects Near ananta 30 found within 3 km
# Project District Status Distance
1 AGAAZ Raipur Ongoing 0.35 km
2 veda - 42 Raipur New 0.39 km
3 the ALTAIR Raipur New 0.54 km
4 REVANTA ESTATE Raipur New 0.75 km
5 sunita park phase 1 Raipur Ongoing 0.86 km
6 avinash one extension Raipur New 1.11 km
7 avinash ONE Raipur New 1.17 km
8 a. mittal avenue Raipur Ongoing 1.37 km
9 shanti nagar Raipur New 1.42 km
10 avinash elegance Raipur New 1.46 km
11 ishita pardise Raipur Ongoing 1.47 km
12 CLOUD 9 BLOCK - B Raipur Ongoing 1.49 km
13 BIMAL AVENUE Raipur Ongoing 1.50 km
14 park serene Raipur Ongoing 1.51 km
15 VAANYA PHASE-2 Raipur Ongoing 1.51 km
16 VAANYA PHASE-1 Raipur New 1.51 km
17 magneto signature homes - ii Raipur Ongoing 1.52 km
18 MAGNETO SIGNATURE HOMES -II APARTMENT Raipur New 1.55 km
19 MOTI MAHAL PALLADIUM Raipur Ongoing 1.61 km
20 CLOUD 9 BLOCK - A Raipur Ongoing 1.63 km
21 quorum Raipur Ongoing 1.66 km
22 VINAYAK HEIGHTS JORA Raipur New 1.73 km
23 CURRENCY TOWER Raipur Ongoing 1.78 km
24 rama greens Raipur New 1.79 km
25 PMAY OF (232DUS) AT LABHANDI ,RAIPUR Raipur Ongoing 1.81 km
26 august silver moon Raipur New 1.81 km
27 aishwarya empire phase - iv Raipur Ongoing 1.87 km
28 aishwarya empire phase - iii Raipur Ongoing 1.87 km
29 aishwarya empire Raipur Ongoing 1.91 km
30 aishwarya empire phase - i Raipur Ongoing 1.92 km

Buyer Checklist

Documents and verifications a buyer should review before purchase.

Buyer Document Verification Checklist

Key documents a buyer should verify before purchasing in this project. Items marked Available have data on Seemankan.

12/14 verified
  • RERA Registration Certificate Available
    Confirms the project is registered with RERA CG. Verify registration number, validity dates, and project details on the RERA portal.
    RERA No: PCGRERA100920001141
    View Certificate View on RERA Portal
  • Promoter Registration Certificate Available
    Builder / colonizer company registration certificate. Confirms the promoter entity is a registered firm, company, or society.
    Preview Preview
  • Approved Building / Sanction Plan Verify Independently
    Building plan sanctioned by the local authority. Verify floor count, setbacks, and FSI compliance.
  • Layout Plan Available
    Approved layout showing plot divisions, roads, open spaces, and common areas.
    Preview
  • Title Deed / Ownership Proof Available
    Proof that the promoter legally owns the land. Verify via Sub-Registrar records.
    Preview
  • Encumbrance Certificate Available
    Confirms the property is free from legal dues, mortgages, or liens. Obtain from Sub-Registrar office.
    Preview
  • Land Use / Diversion Certificate Available
    Required if land was converted from agricultural to non-agricultural use.
    Preview
  • Architect Certificate Available
    Certification from a registered architect confirming structural plans and compliance.
    View View View +10 more
  • Structural Engineer Certificate Available
    Certification from a structural engineer confirming building safety and load-bearing capacity.
    View View View +10 more
  • CA Financial Certificate Available
    Chartered Accountant certificate on financial status, project cost estimates, and fund utilization.
    Preview View View +13 more
  • Commencement Certificate Available
    Permission to begin construction issued by the local authority after plan approval.
    Download Download Download +1 more
  • NOCs (No Objection Certificates) Verify Independently
    NOCs from fire department, environment, water supply, electricity board, and other authorities.
  • Project Brochure / Specification Available
    Official brochure with unit types, amenities, and specifications. Compare with actual delivery.
    View View View +13 more
  • RERA Compliance Orders Available
    Check if any orders, penalties, or directions have been issued against this project by RERA.
    1 order(s) on record — review in Legal tab
Disclaimer: This checklist is for informational purposes only. "Available" means Seemankan has a copy from the RERA portal — it does not constitute legal verification. Always verify original documents with the concerned authorities and consult a legal advisor before making a purchase decision.

Risk Zone Within 5 km

Buffer zones (water bodies, airport restrictions) and risk sites (landfills, waste processing) detected within 3 km (immediate) and 5 km (extended) of the project.

13
Risk zones (within 5 km)
3 km: 3 3–5 km: 9
11
Water bodies (river/nala/lake)
3 km: 3 3–5 km: 8
1
Landfill / waste sites
3 km: 0 3–5 km: 1
1
Airport buffer overlap
3 km: 0 3–5 km: 0
Risk Zone Map (3 km & 5 km rings) Project marker centered
Water Bodies (11)
  • Mahanadi Main Canal ≤3 km
    Canal · 100m buffer
    1.46 km
  • Dunda Talab ≤3 km
    Pond · 50m buffer
    2.43 km
  • Kharun Left Bank Canal ≤3 km
    Canal · 20m buffer
    2.92 km
  • Rajatalab 3–5 km
    Tank · 50m buffer
    3.15 km
  • Heerapur Talab 3–5 km
    Pond · 50m buffer
    3.24 km
  • Telibandha Nala 3–5 km
    Nala · 20m buffer
    3.52 km
  • Khamhardih Nala 3–5 km
    Drain · 20m buffer
    3.66 km
  • Telibandha Talab (Marine Drive) 3–5 km
    Lake · 50m buffer
    3.77 km
Landfill / Waste Sites (1)
  • SLRM Centre Tendua (Tundra) 3–5 km
    Waste processing · 200m buffer
    4.77 km
Airport (1)
  • Swami Vivekananda Airport 5–10 km
    RPR / VARP · DGCA height limits apply
    7.37 km

Reviews

Verified buyer reviews and ratings for this project.

No reviews yet. Be the first to review this project!

Login to Write a Review

You need to be signed in to submit a review for this project.

Login or Register