Home / RERA Projects / AVINASH SUN CITY
ONGOING Plotted Development RERA Page Project Website
GENERATE REPORT

AVINASH SUN CITY

Compliance Status
Partial Compliance
21.2999, 81.6744 Explore area
District
Raipur
Area
—
Promoter
MAMTA AGRAWAL
Project Information
Promoter MAMTA AGRAWAL
Type Plotted Development
Status Ongoing
Completion 29 Jan 2024
RERA No. PCGRERA180618000225
Registered 18 Jun 2018
Original End 30 Apr 2021
EWS Category NO
Construction Cost ₹ 304537000
Land Cost ₹ 226863000
Authorised Person ANAND SINGHANIA
Address DALDALSEONI, KUSHABHAU THAKRE WARD NO. 26, RAIPUR (C.G.)
At a Glance
-
Total Units
-
Units Sold
-
Unsold
10
Legal Cases
Jan 2024
Target Completion
100%
Completion
Amenities & Facilities (16)
BOUNDARY WALL
100%
CLUB HOUSE
100%
COMMUNITY BUILDINGS
100%
ENERGY MAANAGEMENT
100%
GYM
100%
INTERNAL ROADS AND FOOTPATHS
100%
LANDSCAPING AND TREE PLANTING
100%
PLACE OF WORSHIP
100%
SECURITY SERVICE
100%
SEWERAGE
100%
SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT AND DISPOSAL
100%
STREET LIGHTING
100%
SWIMMING POOL
100%
TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL OF SEWERAGE AND SULLAGE WAT
100%
WATER CONSERVATION RAIN WATER HARVESTING
100%
WATER SUPPLY
100%
Project Professionals
TAPAN KUMAR SHARMA
STATUTORY CA
CA SUSHANT SHRIVASTAVA
QUARTERLY CA
NEERAJ BAJPAI
ENGINEER
KIRAN NAIR
ARCHITECT
Project Analysis

360° Project Intelligence

Comprehensive analysis across regulatory, livability, market, filing activity, and market readiness dimensions.

Regulatory
71
10 of 14 checks · Moderate Signals
Livability
67
Mowa · Moderate Signals
Legal
10
10 legal order(s) · 30 nearby
Filing Activity
523
457 docs · 66 quarterly updates
Market Readiness
35
Ongoing · due Jan 2024
Area Livability

Livability of Mowa

Eighteen environmental, infrastructure and amenity parameters for the nearest mapped area (Mowa — 2.68 km from this project). Click any parameter for the underlying readings, thresholds and what they mean.



🏠 Livability Parameters

Latest readings for Mowa. Only parameters with available data are shown below. Based on the latest readings for Mowa.

B
Composite Score
67.4 /100
Good

🌬️ Air Quality

Final Score: 93.2/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Air Quality?AQI summarizes PM2.5, PM10 and gases. Lower pollution values improve public health outcomes.
AQI
67
Satisfactory
PM2.5
35.3 µg/m³
≤ 40
PM10
100.2 µg/m³
≤ 60
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
PM2.5 35.3 µg/m³ ≤ 40
Good
PM10 100.2 µg/m³ ≤ 60
Concern
NO₂ 12.4 µg/m³ ≤ 40
Good
💡 What does this mean for you?Cleaner air lowers respiratory burden and improves outdoor comfort.

💧 Water Quality

Final Score: 74.7/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Water Quality?Water quality combines chemistry, supply duration and contamination markers.
TDS
385 ppm
≤ 500
pH
7.14
6.5–8.5
Supply
5.7 hr/day
≥ 8 hr
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
TDS 385 ppm ≤ 500
Good
Fluoride 0.54 mg/L ≤ 1.0
Good
Turbidity 3.4 NTU ≤ 1
Concern
💡 What does this mean for you?Better supply quality and consistency reduces dependence on tanker/groundwater fallback.

🧹 Sanitation

Final Score: 67.3/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Sanitation?Sanitation reflects ODF status, sewage treatment and waste management regularity.
ODF
ODF+
ODF++
Sewage Coverage
55%
≥ 80%
Drainage
65%
≥ 90%
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
ODF Status ODF+ ODF++
Info
Sewage Coverage 55% ≥ 80%
Concern
Drainage Coverage 65% ≥ 90%
Concern
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher sanitation maturity lowers disease exposure and neighborhood nuisance.

🛣️ Infrastructure

Final Score: 72.1/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Infrastructure?Infrastructure score combines land use, urbanization, built form, night lights and terrain indicators.
Built-up
40.7%
Balanced band
Tree Cover
30.2%
≥ 15%
Urbanization
95.6
Higher better
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Built-up (LULC) 40.7% 40-70%
Contextual
Impervious Surface 18.8% < 70%
Good
NDVI Mean 0.340 > 0.3
Good
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Built-up (LULC) % 45.9% 35.4% 40.7%
Tree Cover % 29.3% 31.2% 30.2%
Urbanization Index 100.0 91.3 95.6
Infra Score 75.2 69.1 72.2
💡 What does this mean for you?Balanced built + green mix usually improves long-term livability resilience.

🏥 Amenities

Final Score: 84.8/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Amenities?Amenity score captures daily-access services in walk/short-drive radii.
Hospitals 500m
1
Target ≥1
Schools 1km
7
Target ≥3
Parks 500m
6
Target ≥1
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Hospitals (500m) 1 ≥1
Good
Schools (1km) 7 ≥3
Good
Markets (1km) 8 ≥1
Good
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher local amenity density improves convenience and walkability.

🌳 Green Cover

Final Score: 45.5/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Green Cover?NDVI and vegetation structure are measured from satellite imagery to estimate neighborhood greenery.
NDVI Mean
0.248
Greenness index
Vegetation
23.6%
% green pixels
Dense Green
14.0%
Thick canopy
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
NDVI Mean 0.248 0.5 maps to score 100
Weighted 40%
Vegetation % 23.6% Direct % (cap 100)
Weighted 30%
Dense Green % 14.0% Scaled from 50%
Weighted 20%
Parks within 500m 6 Count * 33 (cap 100)
Weighted 10%
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
NDVI Mean 0.232 0.264 0.248
Vegetation % 20.9% 26.3% 23.6%
Dense Green % 11.8% 16.3% 14.0%
Tree Canopy % 15.1% 18.4% 16.7%
Green Score 39.5 45.5 42.5
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher green metrics typically reduce heat stress and improve comfort.

🔊 Noise

Final Score: 74.2/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Noise?Noise uses measured day/night dB compared to CPCB zone limits.
Day dB
54.6
vs CPCB day limit
Night dB
49.6
vs CPCB night limit
Zone
commercial
CPCB class
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Day Noise 54.6 dB ≤ 65.0 dB
Good
Night Noise 49.6 dB ≤ 55.0 dB
Good
Nearest Highway 1,208 m Higher usually quieter
Info
💡 What does this mean for you?Chronic high noise impacts stress, sleep quality and perceived comfort.

🌊 Flood Risk

Final Score: 70.0/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Flood Risk?Flood risk combines river exposure and local waterlogging vulnerability.
Overall Risk
Highest
Lower is safer
River Risk
High
Lower is safer
Waterlogging
High
Lower is safer
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Overall Risk Highest Low preferred
Info
River Flood Risk High Low preferred
Info
Waterlogging Risk High Low preferred
Info
💡 What does this mean for you?Lower flood risk means less disruption and lower hazard exposure.

🏚️ Earthquake Risk

Final Score: 25.0/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Earthquake Risk?Earthquake profile uses seismic zone, PGA and soil/liquefaction risk factors.
Seismic Zone
Zone II
Lower risk zone preferred
Risk Level
Low-Medium
Low preferred
Liquefaction
Medium
Low preferred
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Seismic Zone Zone II II preferred
Info
Risk Level Low-Medium Low preferred
Info
PGA (475yr) 0.0155g Lower preferred
Info
💡 What does this mean for you?Lower seismic hazard reduces structural and insurance risk exposure.

🌡️ Land Surface Temp

Final Score: 65.8/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Land Surface Temp?Land Surface Temperature reflects heat-island intensity from satellite thermal bands.
LST Mean
28.6°C
Lower better
LST Min
5.6°C
Context
LST Max
38.9°C
Lower better
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
LST Mean 28.6°C 20°C best / 45°C worst
Weighted by formula
LST Score 65.8 0-100
Computed
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
LST Mean (°C) 28.7 28.4 28.6
LST Min (°C) 4.9 6.2 5.6
LST Max (°C) 39.0 38.8 38.9
LST Score 65.3 66.3 65.8
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher heat exposure affects comfort, cooling load and health risk.

🏗️ Built-up Density

Final Score: 59.4/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Built-up Density?Built-up density measures extent of developed surface versus open space.
Built-up %
40.7%
Lower better
Open Space %
59.4%
Higher better
Built-up Score
59.4
0-100
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Built-up % 40.7% Inverse scoring
Score = 100 - builtup%
Open Space % 59.4% Context
Info
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Built-up % 45.9% 35.4% 40.7%
Open Space % 54.1% 64.6% 59.4%
Built-up Score 54.1 64.6 59.4
💡 What does this mean for you?Very high built-up often raises heat and runoff while reducing open environmental buffers.

💡 Night-time Lights

Final Score: 30.9/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Night-time Lights?Nighttime lights are a proxy for economic activity and electrification intensity.
Avg Radiance
15.44
Higher better
Max Radiance
25.77
Context
NTL Score
30.9
0-100
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Avg Radiance 15.44 Scaled to 50
Score = min(100, avg/50*100)
NTL Score 30.9 0-100
Computed
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Avg Radiance 14.55 16.33 15.44
Max Radiance 25.00 26.53 25.77
NTL Score 29.1 32.7 30.9
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher radiance often indicates stronger urban activity but can correlate with light pollution.

🏞️ Water Bodies

Final Score: 100.0/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Water Bodies?Water-bodies score reflects permanent and seasonal water presence in the analysis radius.
Permanent Water
60.00%
Higher generally better
Seasonal Water
96.20%
Context
Water Score
100.0
0-100
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Permanent Water % 60.00% 70% weight
Scaled against 10%
Seasonal Water % 96.20% 30% weight
Scaled against 20%
Water Score 100.0 0-100
Computed
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Permanent Water % 65.78% 54.22% 60.00%
Seasonal Water % 96.40% 95.99% 96.20%
Water Score 100.0 100.0 100.0
💡 What does this mean for you?Water presence can support cooling, recharge and ecological quality.

👥 Population Density

Final Score: 85.1/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Population Density?Population density indicates urban crowding pressure around the area.
Population
50,059
Estimated residents
Density/km²
2,976.7
Lower better for this score
Score
85.1
0-100
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Density/km² 2,976.7 Inverse scale up to 20,000
Lower -> higher score
Score 85.1 0-100
Computed
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Population Total 8,526 91,592 50,059
Density / km² 2,714.0 3,239.4 2,976.7
Pop Density Score 86.4 83.8 85.1
💡 What does this mean for you?Extremely high density can increase pressure on services and mobility.

⛲ Groundwater

Final Score: 63.8/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Groundwater?Groundwater score combines moisture, recharge, drought and trend indicators.
Soil Moisture
134.057
Higher better
Recharge
2.64
Higher better
PDSI
3.09
Higher better
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Soil Moisture 134.057 30% weight
Scaled
Recharge 2.64 25% weight
Scaled
PDSI 3.09 20% weight
Scaled
SM Trend 0.0000 15% weight
Scaled
Precipitation 1,863.81 10% weight
Scaled
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Soil Moisture 134.469 133.645 134.057
Recharge Estimate 2.94 2.34 2.64
PDSI 3.10 3.09 3.09
Groundwater Score 63.9 63.7 63.8
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher score suggests better long-term aquifer and moisture support conditions.

🌧️ Waterlogging

↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Waterlogging?Waterlogging combines topography, imperviousness and wetness indices across nearby grid cells.
Grid Count
36
Sampled cells
Avg Susceptibility
52.2
Lower is safer
High Risk Grids
31
High / Very High
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTargetStatus
Avg Susceptibility 52.2 < 40
Concern
Avg Slope 2.56° > 1°
Good
Avg Impervious 11.1% < 70%
Good
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher susceptibility and low slope increase monsoon water stagnation probability.

🚶 Walkability & Safety

↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Walkability & Safety?OSM amenity metrics reflect pedestrian, safety and urban accessibility infrastructure.
Footpaths
0
Higher better
Street Lamps
0
Higher better
Police/Fire Access
1
Presence
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Footpaths (500m) 0 ≥ 3
Concern
Sidewalk Roads (1km) 0 ≥ 5
Concern
Nearest Police Station 1,050 m ≤ 2000m
Context
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher OSM accessibility/safety features generally improve everyday livability.

⚠️ Risk Factors

↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Risk Factors?Nearby hazards and sensitive risk points mapped around this area.
Total Risks
5
Mapped points
Scoring Breakdown
CategoryRiskDistance / SeverityMeaning
Land_zoning Unregulated Colonies on Forest Land 600 m / High Colonies developed on revenue/forest land without proper clearance
Future_threats Rapid Construction Saturation 0 m / Medium Over 50 ongoing construction projects in 2 sq km area
Air_pollution Mowa Flyover Traffic Pollution 200 m / Medium Heavy diesel vehicle traffic on NH-53 approach
Infrastructure Internal Road Network Incomplete 300 m / Medium Many colony roads unpaved or under heavy construction
Water_drainage New Colony Drainage Incomplete 400 m / Medium Several new colonies without proper drainage infrastructure
💡 What does this mean for you?Closer and severe risks can affect insurance, resale and safety comfort.

🌬️ Air Quality: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

💧 Water Quality: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🧹 Sanitation: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🛣️ Infrastructure: Infrastructure Score Formula

Formula: Composite weighted model from GHSL/ESA/VIIRS/Terrain features
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Urbanization index95.6420%SMOD
Built-up balance40.7%15%Best in moderate band
NTL stability69.0%15%Power/activity consistency
Avg building height4.84 m10%Vertical infra proxy
Impervious %18.8%10%Moderate is optimal
Radiance15.5010%Development proxy
Slope0.10°10%Flatter is better
Green support30.2%10%Tree + grass contribution
This is the same weighted structure used in Livability Infrastructure model.
Final: 72.22 / 100

🏥 Amenities: Amenity Score Breakdown

Formula: Each amenity category is capped at 100, final score is averaged across categories
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Hospitals 500m1 * 33Cap 100Health access
Schools 1km7 * 20Cap 100Education access
Markets 1km8 * 33Cap 100Daily needs
Parks 500m6 * 33Cap 100Open space
Transit 1km0 * 50Cap 100Mobility
Category multipliers mirror the Livability snapshot logic.
Final: Final from amenity_scores table

🌳 Green Cover: Green Score Formula

Formula: Score = (NDVI*40%) + (Vegetation*30%) + (Dense Green*20%) + (Parks*10%)
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
NDVI component0.248 => 49.640%19.8
Vegetation component23.6% => 23.630%7.1
Dense green component14.0% => 28.120%5.6
Parks component6 => 100.010%10.0
This matches the Livability GreenCover model weighting logic.
Final: 42.52 / 100

🔊 Noise: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🌊 Flood Risk: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🏚️ Earthquake Risk: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🌡️ Land Surface Temp: LST Score Formula

Formula: Score = ((45 - LST Mean) / 25) * 100, clipped to [0,100]
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
LST Mean28.55 °CReference20°C best, 45°C worst
Lower land surface temperature means better livability.
Final: 65.80 / 100

🏗️ Built-up Density: Built-up Score Formula

Formula: Score = 100 - Built-up %
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Built-up %40.7%InverseLower is better
Dense concrete surfaces reduce infiltration and increase heat islands.
Final: 59.35 / 100

💡 Night-time Lights: Night-time Lights Formula

Formula: Score = min(100, (Avg Radiance / 50) * 100)
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Avg Radiance15.44Scale 0-50Higher indicates activity
Higher night radiance generally tracks electrification and economic intensity.
Final: 30.88 / 100

🏞️ Water Bodies: Water Bodies Score Formula

Formula: Score = (Permanent Water Score * 70%) + (Seasonal Water Score * 30%)
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Permanent water60.00%70%Scaled against 10% benchmark
Seasonal water96.20%30%Scaled against 20% benchmark
Permanent water has higher score weight than seasonal water.
Final: 100.00 / 100

👥 Population Density: Population Density Formula

Formula: Score = ((20000 - density_per_km²) / 20000) * 100, clipped to [0,100]
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Density2,976.7 /km²Inverse scaleLower density -> higher score
This follows the Livability PopulationDensity model.
Final: 85.12 / 100

⛲ Groundwater: Groundwater Score Formula

Formula: Weighted: Soil Moisture 30% + Recharge 25% + PDSI 20% + Trend 15% + Precipitation 10%
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Soil moisture134.05730%Scaled to 0-200
Recharge estimate2.6425%Scaled -200 to +400
PDSI3.0920%Scaled -4 to +4
SM trend0.000015%Scaled -50 to +50
Precipitation1,863.8110%Scaled 800 to 1800
Exactly reused from Livability Groundwater model logic.
Final: 63.79 / 100

🌧️ Waterlogging: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🚶 Walkability & Safety: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

⚠️ Risk Factors: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

View full livability report for Mowa →

Compliance Status

RERA registration, filings, and compliance flags based on public CG-RERA records.

Compliance Status Based on public CG-RERA records
2 Passed
1 Warning
1 Issue(s)
2 N/A
RERA Registration Active
Reg No. PCGRERA180618000225 — Status: Ongoing
Section 3 · Source · View Certificate · RERA Official Page
No Penalty Orders
10 order(s) on record, none with penalty sections (Sec 38/39/40/59/61/63)
Sec 38–63 · Source
9 Order(s) in Last 12 Months
Recent: M-ALL-2025-03121, M-ALL-2025-03120, M-ALL-2025-03122, M-PRO-2025-03118, M-ALL-2025-03119 …
Source · M-ALL-2025-03121 · M-ALL-2025-03120 · M-ALL-2025-03122 · M-PRO-2025-03118 · M-ALL-2025-03119 · M-PRO-2025-03017 · M-PRO-2025-03123 · M-ALL-2025-03016 · M-ALL-2025-03019
Completion Overdue
Was due 29 Jan 2024 — overdue by ~27 month(s)
Section 4 · Source
Quarterly Updates Not Available
No compliance snapshot data on record
Section 11 · Source
Annual Audit Not Available
No compliance snapshot data on record
Section 4(2)(l)(D) · Source
Each check is based on publicly available CG-RERA portal data as of May 2026. How this works →
Other Projects by Same Promoter (2)
ProjectRERA No.StatusDistrictType
avinash atulya PCGRERA150618000201 Ongoing Bastar Residential Development
AVINASH WOODS PCGRERA280818000722 New Bastar Residential Development

Details

Registration, professional team, bank, promoters, and compliance history.

Registration Details
RERA Number
PCGRERA180618000225
Status
Ongoing
Project Type
Plotted Development
Approved Date
18 Jun 2018
Original End Date
30 Apr 2021
EWS Category
NO
Construction Cost
₹ 304537000
Land Cost
₹ 226863000
Proposed Completion
29 Jan 2024
Authorised Person
ANAND SINGHANIA
View on Map
Professional Team
RoleNameLicense / Membership
Statutory CA TAPAN KUMAR SHARMA 302107
Quarterly CA CA SUSHANT SHRIVASTAVA 427630
Engineer NEERAJ BAJPAI 268/96
Architect KIRAN NAIR CA/97/21901
Promoters
M
MAMTA AGRAWAL
S
SHWETA RAJESH P.
R
RAM KUMAR AGRAWAL
U
UTTARA DHRUV
M
MAHESH KUMAR VERMA
A
AVINASH INFRA PROJECTS PRIVATE LIMITED THROUGH DIRECTORS Company
A
AVINASH INFRA PROJECTS PRIVATE LIMITED THROUGH DIRECTORS
A
AVINASH INFRA PROJECTS PVT. LTD. Company
A
AVINASH INFRA PROJECTS PVT. LTD.
K
KAVITA SANJAY KEDIA
K
KAVITA CHANDRAKAR
V
VINIL DIXIT
H
HEMIN VERMA

Legal Orders & Cases

RERA legal orders, complaints, and case statistics filed against this project.

10
Total Cases
9
Last 12 Months
1
Older Cases
10
PDFs Available
Legal Orders (10)
ComplaintApplicantSectionDateSourcePDF
M-ALL-2025-03121 M/S AVINASH INFRA PROJECTS PVT. LTD. REPRESENTED THROUGH ITS VICE PRESIDENT MR. RAMESH KUMAR SINGH - 06 Mar 2026 This project
M-ALL-2025-03120 M/S AVINASH INFRA PROJECTS PVT. LTD. REPRESENTED THROUGH ITS VICE PRESIDENT MR. RAMESH KUMAR SINGH - 06 Mar 2026 This project
M-ALL-2025-03122 M/S AVINASH INFRA PROJECTS PVT. LTD. REPRESENTED THROUGH ITS VICE PRESIDENT MR. RAMESH KUMAR SINGH - 06 Mar 2026 This project
M-PRO-2025-03118 M/S AVINASH INFRA PROJECTS PVT. LTD. REPRESENTED THROUGH ITS VICE PRESIDENT MR. RAMESH KUMAR SINGH - 21 Jan 2026 This project
M-ALL-2025-03119 M/S AVINASH INFRA PROJECTS PVT. LTD. REPRESENTED THROUGH ITS VICE PRESIDENT MR. RAMESH KUMAR SINGH - 07 Jan 2026 This project
M-PRO-2025-03017 M/S AVINASH INFRA PROJECTS PVT. LTD. REPRESENTED THROUGH ITS VICE PRESIDENT MR. RAMESH KUMAR SINGH Section 17,Section 18,Section 19 26 Dec 2025 This project
M-PRO-2025-03123 M/S AVINASH INFRA PROJECTS PVT. LTD. REPRESENTED THROUGH ITS VICE PRESIDENT MR. RAMESH KUMAR SINGH - 10 Dec 2025 This project
M-ALL-2025-03016 M/S AVINASH INFRA PROJECTS PVT. LTD. REPRESENTED THROUGH ITS VICE PRESIDENT MR. RAMESH KUMAR SINGH - 12 Nov 2025 This project
M-ALL-2025-03019 M/S AVINASH INFRA PROJECTS PVT. LTD. REPRESENTED THROUGH ITS VICE PRESIDENT MR. RAMESH KUMAR SINGH - 17 Sep 2025 This project
M-COM-2023-01978 CG-RERA - 13 Dec 2023 This project

Location

Project address, coordinates, and nearby places.

Location Details
Address
DALDALSEONI, KUSHABHAU THAKRE WARD NO. 26, RAIPUR (C.G.)
District
Raipur
Tehsil
Raipur
Coordinates
21.2999421, 81.6743642 View on Map
Area Livability

Livability of Mowa Raipur

Environmental, infrastructure & amenity parameters for the area where this project is located (2.68 km from project). Each value is compared with the Raipur average.

Composite Livability Score
67.4 / 100
Grade B · Good
+9.1 vs Raipur avg (58.3)
Air Quality
93.2 Excellent
Area
93
City
89
+4.2 vs city avg
Water Quality
74.7 Good
Area
75
City
68
+6.8 vs city avg
Sanitation
67.3 Good
Area
67
City
56
+11.3 vs city avg
Green Cover
45.5 Below Avg
Area
46
City
39
+7.0 vs city avg
Noise Level
74.2 Good
Area
74
City
58
+16.4 vs city avg
Infrastructure
72.1 Good
Area
72
City
76
-4.1 vs city avg
Amenities
84.8 Excellent
Area
85
City
82
+3.0 vs city avg
Flood Safety
70.0 Good
Area
70
City
38
+31.9 vs city avg
Earthquake Safety
25.0 Poor
Area
25
City
15
+10.4 vs city avg
Land Surface Temp.
65.8 Good
Area
66
City
58
+8.0 vs city avg
Built-up Density
59.4 Average
Area
59
City
35
+24.6 vs city avg
Night-light Activity
30.9 Poor
Area
31
City
55
-23.8 vs city avg
Water Bodies Nearby
100.0 Excellent
Area
100
City
93
+7.3 vs city avg
Population Density
85.1 Excellent
Area
85
City
68
+17.2 vs city avg
Groundwater Status
63.8 Average
Area
64
City
63
+0.4 vs city avg
View detailed livability report for Mowa
Neighborhood Intelligence

Explore nearby infrastructure around this project. Toggle categories to show/hide on the map.

Neighborhood Map 3 km radius
RERA Projects Near AVINASH SUN CITY 30 found within 3 km
# Project District Status Distance
1 AVINASH SUN CITY Raipur Ongoing 0.09 km
2 pmay of 435 dus at daldal seoni raipur Raipur Ongoing 0.47 km
3 PMAY OF 580 (DUS) AT DALDALSEONI, RAIPUR Raipur Ongoing 0.51 km
4 AISHWARYAM VILLE Raipur New 0.58 km
5 RAM ASHRAY Raipur New 0.72 km
6 RAMKUTIR Raipur Ongoing 0.82 km
7 RAMKUTIR-COMMERCIAL COMPLEX Raipur Ongoing 0.87 km
8 PMAY OF 145(DUS) AT DALDALSEONI ,RAIPUR Raipur Ongoing 0.91 km
9 PMAY OF 58(DUS) AT SAMERA, DALDALSEONI, RAIPUR Raipur Ongoing 0.97 km
10 AVINASH COSMOCITY Raipur New 1.09 km
11 ORCHID VIEWS Raipur New 1.47 km
12 orchid views Raipur New 1.49 km
13 ABHINAV APARTMENT Raipur New 1.51 km
14 CLASSIC CITY Raipur Ongoing 1.52 km
15 SARVAM Raipur Ongoing 1.56 km
16 abhinav city Raipur New 1.56 km
17 avani avenue extension Raipur New 1.64 km
18 AVANI AVENUE Raipur Ongoing 1.64 km
19 raheja homes Raipur New 1.64 km
20 HOUSING PROJECTS, VIP CITY Raipur Ongoing 1.70 km
21 VIP HEIGHTS, VIP CITY Raipur Ongoing 1.72 km
22 VIP Villas Raipur New 1.78 km
23 vip city sector -2 (prime) circle chowk Raipur New 1.78 km
24 vip family heights Raipur New 1.81 km
25 VIP CITY, SECTOR -06 Raipur Ongoing 1.83 km
26 HARSH PRIDE (PHASE-I) Raipur Ongoing 1.83 km
27 VIP CITY, SECTOR -05 Raipur Ongoing 1.87 km
28 HARSH PRIDE (PHASE-II) Raipur Ongoing 1.93 km
29 VIP City, Sector-05-B Raipur New 1.95 km
30 vip city sector -2 (prime -1) Raipur New 1.95 km

Buyer Checklist

Documents and verifications a buyer should review before purchase.

Buyer Document Verification Checklist

Key documents a buyer should verify before purchasing in this project. Items marked Available have data on Seemankan.

11/14 verified
  • RERA Registration Certificate Available
    Confirms the project is registered with RERA CG. Verify registration number, validity dates, and project details on the RERA portal.
    RERA No: PCGRERA180618000225
    View Certificate View on RERA Portal
  • Promoter Registration Certificate Available
    Builder / colonizer company registration certificate. Confirms the promoter entity is a registered firm, company, or society.
    Preview
  • Approved Building / Sanction Plan Verify Independently
    Building plan sanctioned by the local authority. Verify floor count, setbacks, and FSI compliance.
  • Layout Plan Available
    Approved layout showing plot divisions, roads, open spaces, and common areas.
    Preview
  • Title Deed / Ownership Proof Available
    Proof that the promoter legally owns the land. Verify via Sub-Registrar records.
    Preview
  • Encumbrance Certificate Available
    Confirms the property is free from legal dues, mortgages, or liens. Obtain from Sub-Registrar office.
    Preview
  • Land Use / Diversion Certificate Verify Independently
    Required if land was converted from agricultural to non-agricultural use.
  • Architect Certificate Available
    Certification from a registered architect confirming structural plans and compliance.
    View View View +18 more
  • Structural Engineer Certificate Available
    Certification from a structural engineer confirming building safety and load-bearing capacity.
    View View View +18 more
  • CA Financial Certificate Available
    Chartered Accountant certificate on financial status, project cost estimates, and fund utilization.
    Preview View View +21 more
  • Commencement Certificate Available
    Permission to begin construction issued by the local authority after plan approval.
    Download Download Download +1 more
  • NOCs (No Objection Certificates) Verify Independently
    NOCs from fire department, environment, water supply, electricity board, and other authorities.
  • Project Brochure / Specification Available
    Official brochure with unit types, amenities, and specifications. Compare with actual delivery.
    View View View +22 more
  • RERA Compliance Orders Available
    Check if any orders, penalties, or directions have been issued against this project by RERA.
    10 order(s) on record — review in Legal tab
Disclaimer: This checklist is for informational purposes only. "Available" means Seemankan has a copy from the RERA portal — it does not constitute legal verification. Always verify original documents with the concerned authorities and consult a legal advisor before making a purchase decision.

Risk Zone Within 5 km

Buffer zones (water bodies, airport restrictions) and risk sites (landfills, waste processing) detected within 3 km (immediate) and 5 km (extended) of the project.

6
Risk zones (within 5 km)
3 km: 2 3–5 km: 4
4
Water bodies (river/nala/lake)
3 km: 1 3–5 km: 3
2
Landfill / waste sites
3 km: 1 3–5 km: 1
0
Airport buffer overlap
3 km: 0 3–5 km: 0
Risk Zone Map (3 km & 5 km rings) Project marker centered
Water Bodies (4)
  • Kendri Talab ≤3 km
    Tank · 50m buffer
    1.73 km
  • Boriyakhurd Talab 3–5 km
    Tank · 50m buffer
    4.48 km
  • Mowa Nala 3–5 km
    Nala · 20m buffer
    4.97 km
  • Heerapur Talab 3–5 km
    Pond · 50m buffer
    5 km
Landfill / Waste Sites (2)
  • Daldal Seoni MSW Transfer Station ≤3 km
    Transfer station · 100m buffer
    2.58 km
  • SLRM Centre Tendua (Tundra) 3–5 km
    Waste processing · 200m buffer
    3.77 km

Reviews

Verified buyer reviews and ratings for this project.

No reviews yet. Be the first to review this project!

Login to Write a Review

You need to be signed in to submit a review for this project.

Login or Register