NEW Commercial Development RERA Page Project Website

GENERATE REPORT

AVINASH CHITWAN SE

21.2624, 81.6903 Explore area

District

Raipur

Area

—

Promoter

M/S AIM INFRASTRUCTURE AND DEVELOPERS

Project Information

Promoter M/S AIM INFRASTRUCTURE AND DEVELOPERS

Type Commercial Development

Status New

Completion 31 Dec 2027

RERA No. PCGRERA110923001671

Registered 11 Sep 2023

Original End 31 Dec 2027

Total Units 124 · 49 sold

EWS Category NO

Construction Cost ₹ 143100000

Land Cost ₹ 45871000

Authorised Person ANAND SINGHANIA

Website www.avinashgroup.com/project/detail/avinash-chitwan-

Address VILLAGE - KACHNA, NEAR AVINASH CHITWAN, TEHSIL RAIPUR, DISTRICT RAIPUR (C.G.) 492012

At a Glance

124

Total Units

Units Sold

Unsold

Legal Cases

Dec 2027

Target Completion

24%

Completion

Amenities & Facilities (10)

BOUNDARY WALL

15%

FIRE PROTECTION AND FIRE SAFETY REQUIREMENTS

10%

INTERNAL ROADS AND FOOTPATHS

LANDSCAPING AND TREE PLANTING

SECURITY SERVICE

25%

STORM WATER DRAINS

STREET LIGHTING

TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL OF SEWERAGE AND SULLAGE WAT

80%

WATER CONSERVATION RAIN WATER HARVESTING

WATER SUPPLY

Project Professionals

TAPAN KUMAR SHARMA

STATUTORY CA

DINESH DEWANGAN

QUARTERLY CA

VISHEK BISEN

ENGINEER

AKHILESH GUPTA

ARCHITECT

Project Analysis

360° Project Intelligence

Comprehensive analysis across regulatory, livability, market, filing activity, and market readiness dimensions.

Regulatory

12 of 14 checks · Strong Signals

Livability

Kachna · Moderate Signals

Legal

No legal orders on record · 30 nearby

Filing Activity

198

168 docs · 30 quarterly updates

Market Readiness

New · due Dec 2027

Area Livability

Livability of Kachna

Eighteen environmental, infrastructure and amenity parameters for the nearest mapped area (Kachna — 0.78 km from this project). Click any parameter for the underlying readings, thresholds and what they mean.

🏠 Livability Parameters

Latest readings for Kachna. Only parameters with available data are shown below. Based on the latest readings for Kachna.

Composite Score

53.4 /100

Average

🌬️ Air Quality

Final Score: 97.2/100 ↑ Higher is Better

ℹ️ What is Air Quality?AQI summarizes PM2.5, PM10 and gases. Lower pollution values improve public health outcomes.

AQI

Satisfactory

PM2.5

32.9 µg/m³

≤ 40

PM10

65.6 µg/m³

≤ 60

Scoring Breakdown

Parameter	Value	Target / Rule	Status
PM2.5	32.9 µg/m³	≤ 40	Good
PM10	65.6 µg/m³	≤ 60	Concern
NO₂	18.0 µg/m³	≤ 40	Good

💡 What does this mean for you?Cleaner air lowers respiratory burden and improves outdoor comfort.

💧 Water Quality

Final Score: 64.3/100 ↑ Higher is Better

ℹ️ What is Water Quality?Water quality combines chemistry, supply duration and contamination markers.

TDS

457 ppm

≤ 500

7.43

6.5–8.5

Supply

5.1 hr/day

≥ 8 hr

Scoring Breakdown

Parameter	Value	Target / Rule	Status
TDS	457 ppm	≤ 500	Good
Fluoride	0.63 mg/L	≤ 1.0	Good
Turbidity	5.5 NTU	≤ 1	Concern

💡 What does this mean for you?Better supply quality and consistency reduces dependence on tanker/groundwater fallback.

🧹 Sanitation

Final Score: 31.1/100 ↑ Higher is Better

ℹ️ What is Sanitation?Sanitation reflects ODF status, sewage treatment and waste management regularity.

ODF

ODF++

Sewage Coverage

22%

≥ 80%

Drainage

32%

≥ 90%

Scoring Breakdown

Parameter	Value	Target / Rule	Status
ODF Status	ODF	ODF++	Info
Sewage Coverage	22%	≥ 80%	Concern
Drainage Coverage	32%	≥ 90%	Concern

💡 What does this mean for you?Higher sanitation maturity lowers disease exposure and neighborhood nuisance.

🛣️ Infrastructure

Final Score: 60.2/100 ↑ Higher is Better

ℹ️ What is Infrastructure?Infrastructure score combines land use, urbanization, built form, night lights and terrain indicators.

Built-up

21.6%

Balanced band

Tree Cover

16.4%

≥ 15%

Urbanization

95.4

Higher better

Scoring Breakdown

Parameter	Value	Target / Rule	Status
Built-up (LULC)	21.6%	40-70%	Contextual
Impervious Surface	14.9%	< 70%	Good
NDVI Mean	0.300	> 0.3	Concern

Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison

Parameter	1000m	3000m	Average (Final)
Built-up (LULC) %	18.1%	25.1%	21.6%
Tree Cover %	18.9%	13.9%	16.4%
Urbanization Index	100.0	90.9	95.4
Infra Score	59.9	60.5	60.2

💡 What does this mean for you?Balanced built + green mix usually improves long-term livability resilience.

🏥 Amenities

Final Score: 56.8/100 ↑ Higher is Better

ℹ️ What is Amenities?Amenity score captures daily-access services in walk/short-drive radii.

Hospitals 500m

Target ≥1

Schools 1km

Target ≥3

Parks 500m

Target ≥1

Scoring Breakdown

Parameter	Value	Target / Rule	Status
Hospitals (500m)	0	≥1	Concern
Schools (1km)	6	≥3	Good
Markets (1km)	1	≥1	Good

💡 What does this mean for you?Higher local amenity density improves convenience and walkability.

🌳 Green Cover

Final Score: 36.7/100 ↑ Higher is Better

ℹ️ What is Green Cover?NDVI and vegetation structure are measured from satellite imagery to estimate neighborhood greenery.

NDVI Mean

0.219

Greenness index

Vegetation

32.7%

% green pixels

Dense Green

17.2%

Thick canopy

Scoring Breakdown

Parameter	Value	Target / Rule	Status
NDVI Mean	0.219	0.5 maps to score 100	Weighted 40%
Vegetation %	32.7%	Direct % (cap 100)	Weighted 30%
Dense Green %	17.2%	Scaled from 50%	Weighted 20%
Parks within 500m	0	Count * 33 (cap 100)	Weighted 10%

Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison

Parameter	1000m	3000m	Average (Final)
NDVI Mean	0.216	0.221	0.219
Vegetation %	27.4%	38.1%	32.7%
Dense Green %	15.6%	18.9%	17.2%
Tree Canopy %	19.3%	16.8%	18.1%
Green Score	31.8	36.7	34.2

💡 What does this mean for you?Higher green metrics typically reduce heat stress and improve comfort.

🔊 Noise

Final Score: 43.7/100 ↑ Higher is Better

ℹ️ What is Noise?Noise uses measured day/night dB compared to CPCB zone limits.

Day dB

56.7

vs CPCB day limit

Night dB

45.1

vs CPCB night limit

Zone

CPCB class

Scoring Breakdown

Parameter	Value	Target / Rule	Status
Day Noise	56.7 dB	≤ 55.0 dB	Concern
Night Noise	45.1 dB	≤ 45.0 dB	Concern
Nearest Highway	1,926 m	Higher usually quieter	Info

💡 What does this mean for you?Chronic high noise impacts stress, sleep quality and perceived comfort.

🌊 Flood Risk

Final Score: 70.0/100 ↑ Higher is Better

ℹ️ What is Flood Risk?Flood risk combines river exposure and local waterlogging vulnerability.

Overall Risk

Highest

Lower is safer

River Risk

High

Lower is safer

Waterlogging

High

Lower is safer

Scoring Breakdown

Parameter	Value	Target / Rule	Status
Overall Risk	Highest	Low preferred	Info
River Flood Risk	High	Low preferred	Info
Waterlogging Risk	High	Low preferred	Info

💡 What does this mean for you?Lower flood risk means less disruption and lower hazard exposure.

🏚️ Earthquake Risk

Final Score: 25.0/100 ↑ Higher is Better

ℹ️ What is Earthquake Risk?Earthquake profile uses seismic zone, PGA and soil/liquefaction risk factors.

Seismic Zone

Zone II

Lower risk zone preferred

Risk Level

Low-Medium

Low preferred

Liquefaction

Medium

Low preferred

Scoring Breakdown

Parameter	Value	Target / Rule	Status
Seismic Zone	Zone II	II preferred	Info
Risk Level	Low-Medium	Low preferred	Info
PGA (475yr)	0.0155g	Lower preferred	Info

💡 What does this mean for you?Lower seismic hazard reduces structural and insurance risk exposure.

🌡️ Land Surface Temp

Final Score: 67.2/100 ↑ Higher is Better

ℹ️ What is Land Surface Temp?Land Surface Temperature reflects heat-island intensity from satellite thermal bands.

LST Mean

28.2°C

Lower better

LST Min

-2.0°C

Context

LST Max

39.7°C

Lower better

Scoring Breakdown

Parameter	Value	Target / Rule	Status
LST Mean	28.2°C	20°C best / 45°C worst	Weighted by formula
LST Score	67.2	0-100	Computed

Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison

Parameter	1000m	3000m	Average (Final)
LST Mean (°C)	27.9	28.4	28.2
LST Min (°C)	-2.6	-1.3	-2.0
LST Max (°C)	39.2	40.1	39.7
LST Score	68.2	66.2	67.2

💡 What does this mean for you?Higher heat exposure affects comfort, cooling load and health risk.

🏗️ Built-up Density

Final Score: 78.4/100 ↑ Higher is Better

ℹ️ What is Built-up Density?Built-up density measures extent of developed surface versus open space.

Built-up %

21.6%

Lower better

Open Space %

78.4%

Higher better

Built-up Score

78.4

0-100

Scoring Breakdown

Parameter	Value	Target / Rule	Status
Built-up %	21.6%	Inverse scoring	Score = 100 - builtup%
Open Space %	78.4%	Context	Info

Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison

Parameter	1000m	3000m	Average (Final)
Built-up %	18.1%	25.1%	21.6%
Open Space %	81.9%	74.9%	78.4%
Built-up Score	81.9	74.9	78.4

💡 What does this mean for you?Very high built-up often raises heat and runoff while reducing open environmental buffers.

💡 Night-time Lights

Final Score: 39.8/100 ↑ Higher is Better

ℹ️ What is Night-time Lights?Nighttime lights are a proxy for economic activity and electrification intensity.

Avg Radiance

19.91

Higher better

Max Radiance

32.87

Context

NTL Score

39.8

0-100

Scoring Breakdown

Parameter	Value	Target / Rule	Status
Avg Radiance	19.91	Scaled to 50	Score = min(100, avg/50*100)
NTL Score	39.8	0-100	Computed

Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison

Parameter	1000m	3000m	Average (Final)
Avg Radiance	20.39	19.42	19.91
Max Radiance	34.32	31.41	32.87
NTL Score	40.8	38.8	39.8

💡 What does this mean for you?Higher radiance often indicates stronger urban activity but can correlate with light pollution.

🏞️ Water Bodies

Final Score: 100.0/100 ↑ Higher is Better

ℹ️ What is Water Bodies?Water-bodies score reflects permanent and seasonal water presence in the analysis radius.

Permanent Water

57.93%

Higher generally better

Seasonal Water

95.93%

Context

Water Score

100.0

0-100

Scoring Breakdown

Parameter	Value	Target / Rule	Status
Permanent Water %	57.93%	70% weight	Scaled against 10%
Seasonal Water %	95.93%	30% weight	Scaled against 20%
Water Score	100.0	0-100	Computed

Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison

Parameter	1000m	3000m	Average (Final)
Permanent Water %	72.23%	43.62%	57.93%
Seasonal Water %	98.72%	93.13%	95.93%
Water Score	100.0	100.0	100.0

💡 What does this mean for you?Water presence can support cooling, recharge and ecological quality.

👥 Population Density

Final Score: 90.1/100 ↑ Higher is Better

ℹ️ What is Population Density?Population density indicates urban crowding pressure around the area.

Population

34,343

Estimated residents

Density/km²

1,972.6

Lower better for this score

Score

90.1

0-100

Scoring Breakdown

Parameter	Value	Target / Rule	Status
Density/km²	1,972.6	Inverse scale up to 20,000	Lower -> higher score
Score	90.1	0-100	Computed

Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison

Parameter	1000m	3000m	Average (Final)
Population Total	5,358	63,328	34,343
Density / km²	1,705.4	2,239.8	1,972.6
Pop Density Score	91.5	88.8	90.1

💡 What does this mean for you?Extremely high density can increase pressure on services and mobility.

⛲ Groundwater

Final Score: 63.9/100 ↑ Higher is Better

ℹ️ What is Groundwater?Groundwater score combines moisture, recharge, drought and trend indicators.

Soil Moisture

135.162

Higher better

Recharge

2.48

Higher better

PDSI

3.09

Higher better

Scoring Breakdown

Parameter	Value	Target / Rule	Status
Soil Moisture	135.162	30% weight	Scaled
Recharge	2.48	25% weight	Scaled
PDSI	3.09	20% weight	Scaled
SM Trend	0.0000	15% weight	Scaled
Precipitation	1,860.77	10% weight	Scaled

Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison

Parameter	1000m	3000m	Average (Final)
Soil Moisture	134.842	135.481	135.162
Recharge Estimate	2.87	2.09	2.48
PDSI	3.10	3.08	3.09
Groundwater Score	63.9	64.0	63.9

💡 What does this mean for you?Higher score suggests better long-term aquifer and moisture support conditions.

🌧️ Waterlogging

↑ Higher is Better

ℹ️ What is Waterlogging?Waterlogging combines topography, imperviousness and wetness indices across nearby grid cells.

Grid Count

Sampled cells

Avg Susceptibility

50.9

Lower is safer

High Risk Grids

High / Very High

Scoring Breakdown

Parameter	Value	Target	Status
Avg Susceptibility	50.9	< 40	Concern
Avg Slope	2.38°	> 1°	Good
Avg Impervious	14.5%	< 70%	Good

💡 What does this mean for you?Higher susceptibility and low slope increase monsoon water stagnation probability.

🚶 Walkability & Safety

↑ Higher is Better

ℹ️ What is Walkability & Safety?OSM amenity metrics reflect pedestrian, safety and urban accessibility infrastructure.

Footpaths

Higher better

Street Lamps

Higher better

Police/Fire Access

Presence

Scoring Breakdown

Parameter	Value	Target / Rule	Status
Footpaths (500m)	0	≥ 3	Concern
Sidewalk Roads (1km)	0	≥ 5	Concern
Nearest Police Station	— m	≤ 2000m	Context

💡 What does this mean for you?Higher OSM accessibility/safety features generally improve everyday livability.

🌬️ Air Quality: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.

Component	Value	Weight/Rule	Contribution
Source	area_scores (latest by score_date)	Pipeline	Weighted model in backend

Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.

Final: See card score

💧 Water Quality: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.

Component	Value	Weight/Rule	Contribution
Source	area_scores (latest by score_date)	Pipeline	Weighted model in backend

Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.

Final: See card score

🧹 Sanitation: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.

Component	Value	Weight/Rule	Contribution
Source	area_scores (latest by score_date)	Pipeline	Weighted model in backend

Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.

Final: See card score

🛣️ Infrastructure: Infrastructure Score Formula

Formula: Composite weighted model from GHSL/ESA/VIIRS/Terrain features

Component	Value	Weight/Rule	Contribution
Urbanization index	95.43	20%	SMOD
Built-up balance	21.6%	15%	Best in moderate band
NTL stability	67.0%	15%	Power/activity consistency
Avg building height	2.67 m	10%	Vertical infra proxy
Impervious %	14.9%	10%	Moderate is optimal
Radiance	19.09	10%	Development proxy
Slope	0.10°	10%	Flatter is better
Green support	16.4%	10%	Tree + grass contribution

This is the same weighted structure used in Livability Infrastructure model.

Final: 60.17 / 100

🏥 Amenities: Amenity Score Breakdown

Formula: Each amenity category is capped at 100, final score is averaged across categories

Component	Value	Weight/Rule	Contribution
Hospitals 500m	0 * 33	Cap 100	Health access
Schools 1km	6 * 20	Cap 100	Education access
Markets 1km	1 * 33	Cap 100	Daily needs
Parks 500m	0 * 33	Cap 100	Open space
Transit 1km	0 * 50	Cap 100	Mobility

Category multipliers mirror the Livability snapshot logic.

Final: Final from amenity_scores table

🌳 Green Cover: Green Score Formula

Formula: Score = (NDVI*40%) + (Vegetation*30%) + (Dense Green*20%) + (Parks*10%)

Component	Value	Weight/Rule	Contribution
NDVI component	0.219 => 43.8	40%	17.5
Vegetation component	32.7% => 32.7	30%	9.8
Dense green component	17.2% => 34.5	20%	6.9
Parks component	0 => 0.0	10%	0.0

This matches the Livability GreenCover model weighting logic.

Final: 34.24 / 100

🔊 Noise: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.

Component	Value	Weight/Rule	Contribution
Source	area_scores (latest by score_date)	Pipeline	Weighted model in backend

Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.

Final: See card score

🌊 Flood Risk: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.

Component	Value	Weight/Rule	Contribution
Source	area_scores (latest by score_date)	Pipeline	Weighted model in backend

Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.

Final: See card score

🏚️ Earthquake Risk: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.

Component	Value	Weight/Rule	Contribution
Source	area_scores (latest by score_date)	Pipeline	Weighted model in backend

Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.

Final: See card score

🌡️ Land Surface Temp: LST Score Formula

Formula: Score = ((45 - LST Mean) / 25) * 100, clipped to [0,100]

Component	Value	Weight/Rule	Contribution
LST Mean	28.19 °C	Reference	20°C best, 45°C worst

Lower land surface temperature means better livability.

Final: 67.24 / 100

🏗️ Built-up Density: Built-up Score Formula

Formula: Score = 100 - Built-up %

Component	Value	Weight/Rule	Contribution
Built-up %	21.6%	Inverse	Lower is better

Dense concrete surfaces reduce infiltration and increase heat islands.

Final: 78.40 / 100

💡 Night-time Lights: Night-time Lights Formula

Formula: Score = min(100, (Avg Radiance / 50) * 100)

Component	Value	Weight/Rule	Contribution
Avg Radiance	19.91	Scale 0-50	Higher indicates activity

Higher night radiance generally tracks electrification and economic intensity.

Final: 39.81 / 100

🏞️ Water Bodies: Water Bodies Score Formula

Formula: Score = (Permanent Water Score * 70%) + (Seasonal Water Score * 30%)

Component	Value	Weight/Rule	Contribution
Permanent water	57.93%	70%	Scaled against 10% benchmark
Seasonal water	95.93%	30%	Scaled against 20% benchmark

Permanent water has higher score weight than seasonal water.

Final: 100.00 / 100

👥 Population Density: Population Density Formula

Formula: Score = ((20000 - density_per_km²) / 20000) * 100, clipped to [0,100]

Component	Value	Weight/Rule	Contribution
Density	1,972.6 /km²	Inverse scale	Lower density -> higher score

This follows the Livability PopulationDensity model.

Final: 90.14 / 100

⛲ Groundwater: Groundwater Score Formula

Formula: Weighted: Soil Moisture 30% + Recharge 25% + PDSI 20% + Trend 15% + Precipitation 10%

Component	Value	Weight/Rule	Contribution
Soil moisture	135.162	30%	Scaled to 0-200
Recharge estimate	2.48	25%	Scaled -200 to +400
PDSI	3.09	20%	Scaled -4 to +4
SM trend	0.0000	15%	Scaled -50 to +50
Precipitation	1,860.77	10%	Scaled 800 to 1800

Exactly reused from Livability Groundwater model logic.

Final: 63.94 / 100

🌧️ Waterlogging: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.

Component	Value	Weight/Rule	Contribution
Source	area_scores (latest by score_date)	Pipeline	Weighted model in backend

Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.

Final: See card score

🚶 Walkability & Safety: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.

Component	Value	Weight/Rule	Contribution
Source	area_scores (latest by score_date)	Pipeline	Weighted model in backend

Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.

Final: See card score

View full livability report for Kachna →

Compliance Status

RERA registration, filings, and compliance flags based on public CG-RERA records.

Compliance Status Based on public CG-RERA records

4 Passed

2 N/A

RERA Registration Active

Reg No. PCGRERA110923001671 — Status: New

Section 3 · Source · View Certificate · RERA Official Page

No RERA Orders

No complaints or orders found against this project

Sec 38–63 · Source

No Orders in Last 12 Months

Clean record — no complaints or orders filed

Source

Within Timeline

Target completion: 31 Dec 2027

Section 4 · Source

Quarterly Updates Not Available

No compliance snapshot data on record

Section 11 · Source

Annual Audit Not Available

No compliance snapshot data on record

Section 4(2)(l)(D) · Source

Each check is based on publicly available CG-RERA portal data as of Apr 2026. How this works →

Other Projects by Same Promoter (8)

Project	RERA No.	Status	District	Type
avinash chitwan	PCGRERA080121001179	New	Raipur	Residential Development
avinash chitwan -phase-1	PCGRERA010620001117	New	Raipur	Residential Plotted Development
avinash chitwan -phase-1 ,part-2	PCGRERA050321001205	New	Raipur	Residential Plotted Development
avinash chitwan -phase-1 ,part-3	PCGRERA280521001224	New	Raipur	Residential Plotted Development
Avinash CHitwan Phase - 3	PCGRERA010324001740	New	Raipur	Residential Plotted Development
Avinash ChiTwan Phase-05	PCGRERA241025001983	New	Raipur	Residential Plotted Development
avinash chitwan phase-4	PCGRERA010324001741	New	Raipur	Residential Plotted Development
avinash chitwan- 2	PCGRERA090622001435	New	Raipur	Residential Plotted Development

Details

Registration, professional team, bank, promoters, and compliance history.

Registration Details

RERA Number: PCGRERA110923001671
Status: New
Project Type: Commercial Development
Approved Date: 11 Sep 2023
Original End Date: 31 Dec 2027

EWS Category: NO
Construction Cost: ₹ 143100000
Land Cost: ₹ 45871000
Proposed Completion: 31 Dec 2027
Authorised Person: ANAND SINGHANIA
Website: www.avinashgroup.com/project/detail/avinash-chitwan-

View on Map

Professional Team

Role	Name	License / Membership
Statutory CA	TAPAN KUMAR SHARMA	302107
Quarterly CA	Dinesh Dewangan	454646
Engineer	Vishek Bisen	1119
Architect	Akhilesh Gupta	CA/2009/46770

Promoters

M/S AIM INFRASTRUCTURE AND DEVELOPERS Partnership Firm

Legal Orders & Cases

RERA legal orders, complaints, and case statistics filed against this project.

Legal Orders (0)

Complaint	Applicant	Section	Date	Source	PDF
No orders found for this project.

Location

Project address, coordinates, and nearby places.

Location Details

Address: VILLAGE - KACHNA, NEAR AVINASH CHITWAN, TEHSIL RAIPUR, DISTRICT RAIPUR (C.G.) 492012
District: Raipur
Tehsil: Raipur
Coordinates: 21.2623935, 81.6902587 View on Map

Neighborhood Intelligence

Explore nearby infrastructure around this project. Toggle categories to show/hide on the map.

Neighborhood Map 3 km radius

RERA Projects Near Avinash chitwan SE 30 found within 3 km

#	Project	District	Status	Distance
1	avinash chitwan -phase-1 ,part-2	Raipur	New	0.13 km
2	Avinash CHitwan Phase - 3	Raipur	New	0.16 km
3	avinash chitwan- 2	Raipur	New	0.30 km
4	avinash chitwan	Raipur	New	0.32 km
5	AISHWARYA KINGDOM	Raipur	Ongoing	0.40 km
6	avinash chitwan -phase-1	Raipur	New	0.41 km
7	SWASTIK EAST - 12	Raipur	Ongoing	0.44 km
8	Rama Eiko PHASE-I	Raipur	New	0.48 km
9	AMBIENCE NATURE	Raipur	New	0.53 km
10	ambience nature phase ii	Raipur	New	0.55 km
11	avinash chitwan phase-4	Raipur	New	0.61 km
12	RAJDHANI VIHAR COLONY	Raipur	Ongoing	0.69 km
13	avinash chitwan -phase-1 ,part-3	Raipur	New	0.71 km
14	ONYX- 18	Raipur	New	0.75 km
15	RITAM aSCENT	Raipur	New	0.82 km
16	aura-the residences (phase-i)	Raipur	Ongoing	0.83 km
17	RITAM	Raipur	New	0.84 km
18	ALAYA PLOTS, ANANDAM WORLD CITY	Raipur	Ongoing	0.86 km
19	ARSHIYA APARTMENT (M2), MIRAYA APARTMENT (M3)	Raipur	Ongoing	0.87 km
20	COMMERCIAL COMPLEX (C 1) ANANDAM WORLD CITY	Raipur	Ongoing	0.87 km
21	green glory	Raipur	Ongoing	0.88 km
22	AISHWARYA GREATER-II	Raipur	New	0.91 km
23	ASTHA GREENS	Raipur	Ongoing	0.92 km
24	aishwarya greater	Raipur	Ongoing	0.92 km
25	woods ville	Raipur	New	0.96 km
26	WOODS ESTATE PHASE-IV	Raipur	New	0.97 km
27	woods estate phase- 05	Raipur	New	0.97 km
28	WOODS ESTATE PHASE-i	Raipur	Ongoing	0.98 km
29	ANANDA PLOTS ,ANANDAM WORLD CITY ,RAIPUR	Raipur	New	1.00 km
30	The riCHmond park	Raipur	New	1.01 km

Buyer Checklist

Documents and verifications a buyer should review before purchase.

Buyer Document Verification Checklist

Key documents a buyer should verify before purchasing in this project. Items marked Available have data on Seemankan.

11/14 verified

RERA Registration Certificate Available

Confirms the project is registered with RERA CG. Verify registration number, validity dates, and project details on the RERA portal.

RERA No: PCGRERA110923001671

View Certificate View on RERA Portal
Promoter Registration Certificate Available

Builder / colonizer company registration certificate. Confirms the promoter entity is a registered firm, company, or society.

Preview Preview
Approved Building / Sanction Plan Available

Building plan sanctioned by the local authority. Verify floor count, setbacks, and FSI compliance.

Preview Preview
Layout Plan Available

Approved layout showing plot divisions, roads, open spaces, and common areas.

Preview
Title Deed / Ownership Proof Available

Proof that the promoter legally owns the land. Verify via Sub-Registrar records.

Preview
Encumbrance Certificate Available

Confirms the property is free from legal dues, mortgages, or liens. Obtain from Sub-Registrar office.

Preview
Land Use / Diversion Certificate Available

Required if land was converted from agricultural to non-agricultural use.

Preview
Architect Certificate Available

Certification from a registered architect confirming structural plans and compliance.

View View View +12 more
Structural Engineer Certificate Available

Certification from a structural engineer confirming building safety and load-bearing capacity.

View View View +12 more
CA Financial Certificate Available

Chartered Accountant certificate on financial status, project cost estimates, and fund utilization.

Preview View View +9 more
Commencement Certificate Verify Independently

Permission to begin construction issued by the local authority after plan approval.
NOCs (No Objection Certificates) Verify Independently

NOCs from fire department, environment, water supply, electricity board, and other authorities.
Project Brochure / Specification Available

Official brochure with unit types, amenities, and specifications. Compare with actual delivery.

View View View +10 more
RERA Compliance Orders Verify Independently

Check if any orders, penalties, or directions have been issued against this project by RERA.

Risk Zone Within 5 km

Buffer zones (water bodies, airport restrictions) and risk sites (landfills, waste processing) detected within 3 km (immediate) and 5 km (extended) of the project.

Risk zones (within 5 km)

3 km: 4 3–5 km: 8

Water bodies (river/nala/lake)

3 km: 2 3–5 km: 8

Landfill / waste sites

3 km: 2 3–5 km: 0

Airport buffer overlap

3 km: 0 3–5 km: 0

Risk Zone Map (3 km & 5 km rings) Project marker centered

Water Bodies (10)

Heerapur Talab ≤3 km

Pond · 50m buffer

1.78 km
Kharun Left Bank Canal ≤3 km

Canal · 20m buffer

2.85 km
Kendri Talab 3–5 km

Tank · 50m buffer

3.56 km
Telibandha Nala 3–5 km

Nala · 20m buffer

3.77 km
Kharun River 3–5 km

River · 75m buffer

3.91 km
Telibandha Talab (Marine Drive) 3–5 km

Lake · 50m buffer

4.15 km
Muktangan Talab 3–5 km

Tank · 50m buffer

4.21 km
Boriyakhurd Talab 3–5 km

Tank · 50m buffer

4.42 km

Landfill / Waste Sites (2)

Daldal Seoni MSW Transfer Station ≤3 km

Transfer station · 100m buffer

2.01 km
SLRM Centre Tendua (Tundra) ≤3 km

Waste processing · 200m buffer

2.45 km

Reviews

Verified buyer reviews and ratings for this project.

No reviews yet. Be the first to review this project!

Login to Write a Review

You need to be signed in to submit a review for this project.