Want a full project intelligence report? Download a detailed PDF report — RERA compliance, promoter, financials, amenities, location & risk.

Generate Project Report

NEW Residential Plotted Development RERA Page Project Website

GENERATE REPORT

ASHOKA PALM MEADOWS PHASE-5

21.1823, 81.6569 Explore area

District

Raipur

Area

—

Promoter

AARTI COLONIZERS CO.

Project Information

Promoter AARTI COLONIZERS CO.

Type Residential Plotted Development

Status New

Completion 24 Nov 2026

RERA No. PCGRERA250222001345

Registered 25 Feb 2022

Original End 24 Nov 2026

Total Units 16 · 16 sold

EWS Category NO

Construction Cost ₹ 10353000

Land Cost ₹ 11137000

Authorised Person rajesh atlani

Website www.ashokapalmmeadows.com

Address VILLAGE- OLD DHAMTARI ROAD DUNDA TEHSIL-RAIPUR ,DIST-RAIPUR (cg)

At a Glance

Total Units

Units Sold

Unsold

Legal Cases

Nov 2026

Target Completion

100%

Completion

Amenities & Facilities (11)

BOUNDARY WALL

100%

ENERGY MAANAGEMENT

100%

INTERNAL ROADS AND FOOTPATHS

100%

LANDSCAPING AND TREE PLANTING

100%

SECURITY SERVICE

100%

SEWERAGE

100%

STORM WATER DRAINS

100%

STREET LIGHTING

100%

TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL OF SEWERAGE AND SULLAGE WAT

100%

WATER CONSERVATION RAIN WATER HARVESTING

100%

WATER SUPPLY

100%

Project Professionals

PANKAJ JAIN

STATUTORY CA

SUMIT BANERJEE

QUARTERLY CA

SHUBHAM AHUJA

ENGINEER

ANURAG SINGH

ARCHITECT

Project Analysis

360° Project Intelligence

Comprehensive analysis across regulatory, livability, market, filing activity, and market readiness dimensions.

Regulatory

13 of 14 checks · Strong Signals

Livability

Boriyakala · Strong Signals

Legal

No legal orders on record · 30 nearby

Filing Activity

273

222 docs · 51 quarterly updates

Market Readiness

New · due Nov 2026

Area Livability

Livability of Boriyakala

Eighteen environmental, infrastructure and amenity parameters for the nearest mapped area (Boriyakala — 1.59 km from this project). Click any parameter for the underlying readings, thresholds and what they mean.

🏠 Livability Parameters

Latest readings for Boriyakala. Only parameters with available data are shown below. Based on the latest readings for Boriyakala.

Composite Score

76.5 /100

Good

🌬️ Air Quality

Final Score: 94.0/100 ↑ Higher is Better

ℹ️ What is Air Quality?AQI summarizes PM2.5, PM10 and gases. Lower pollution values improve public health outcomes.

AQI

Satisfactory

PM2.5

14.7 µg/m³

≤ 40

PM10

33.0 µg/m³

≤ 60

Scoring Breakdown

Parameter	Value	Target / Rule	Status
PM2.5	14.7 µg/m³	≤ 40	Good
PM10	33.0 µg/m³	≤ 60	Good
NO₂	8.8 µg/m³	≤ 40	Good

💡 What does this mean for you?Cleaner air lowers respiratory burden and improves outdoor comfort.

💧 Water Quality

Final Score: 74.6/100 ↑ Higher is Better

ℹ️ What is Water Quality?Water quality combines chemistry, supply duration and contamination markers.

TDS

377 ppm

≤ 500

7.12

6.5–8.5

Supply

5.6 hr/day

≥ 8 hr

Scoring Breakdown

Parameter	Value	Target / Rule	Status
TDS	377 ppm	≤ 500	Good
Fluoride	0.87 mg/L	≤ 1.0	Good
Turbidity	3.6 NTU	≤ 1	Concern

💡 What does this mean for you?Better supply quality and consistency reduces dependence on tanker/groundwater fallback.

🛣️ Infrastructure

Final Score: 31.9/100 ↑ Higher is Better

ℹ️ What is Infrastructure?Infrastructure score combines land use, urbanization, built form, night lights and terrain indicators.

Built-up

6.4%

Balanced band

Tree Cover

2.5%

≥ 15%

Urbanization

26.2

Higher better

Scoring Breakdown

Parameter	Value	Target / Rule	Status
Built-up (LULC)	6.4%	40-70%	Contextual
Impervious Surface	5.5%	< 70%	Good
NDVI Mean	0.350	> 0.3	Good

Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison

Parameter	1000m	3000m	Average (Final)
Built-up (LULC) %	1.4%	11.3%	6.4%
Tree Cover %	2.0%	3.0%	2.5%
Urbanization Index	10.9	41.5	26.2
Infra Score	25.7	38.1	32.0

💡 What does this mean for you?Balanced built + green mix usually improves long-term livability resilience.

🏥 Amenities

Final Score: 90.0/100 ↑ Higher is Better

ℹ️ What is Amenities?Amenity score captures daily-access services in walk/short-drive radii.

Hospitals 500m

Target ≥1

Schools 1km

Target ≥3

Parks 500m

Target ≥1

Scoring Breakdown

Parameter	Target / Rule	Status
Hospitals (500m)	≥1	Concern
Schools (1km)	≥3	Concern
Markets (1km)	≥1	Concern

💡 What does this mean for you?Higher local amenity density improves convenience and walkability.

🌳 Green Cover

Final Score: 41.8/100 ↑ Higher is Better

ℹ️ What is Green Cover?NDVI and vegetation structure are measured from satellite imagery to estimate neighborhood greenery.

NDVI Mean

0.252

Greenness index

Vegetation

84.1%

% green pixels

Dense Green

1.4%

Thick canopy

Scoring Breakdown

Parameter	Value	Target / Rule	Status
NDVI Mean	0.252	0.5 maps to score 100	Weighted 40%
Vegetation %	84.1%	Direct % (cap 100)	Weighted 30%
Dense Green %	1.4%	Scaled from 50%	Weighted 20%
Parks within 500m	0	Count * 33 (cap 100)	Weighted 10%

Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison

Parameter	1000m	3000m	Average (Final)
NDVI Mean	0.267	0.237	0.252
Vegetation %	93.5%	74.8%	84.1%
Dense Green %	1.8%	1.0%	1.4%
Tree Canopy %	1.3%	0.7%	1.0%
Green Score	50.1	41.8	46.0

💡 What does this mean for you?Higher green metrics typically reduce heat stress and improve comfort.

🔊 Noise

Final Score: 100.0/100 ↑ Higher is Better

ℹ️ What is Noise?Noise uses measured day/night dB compared to CPCB zone limits.

Day dB

58.3

vs CPCB day limit

Night dB

53.3

vs CPCB night limit

Zone

residential

CPCB class

Scoring Breakdown

Parameter	Value	Target / Rule	Status
Day Noise	58.3 dB	≤ 55.0 dB	Concern
Night Noise	53.3 dB	≤ 45.0 dB	Concern
Nearest Highway	— m	Higher usually quieter	Info

💡 What does this mean for you?Chronic high noise impacts stress, sleep quality and perceived comfort.

🌊 Flood Risk

Final Score: 90.0/100 ↑ Higher is Better

ℹ️ What is Flood Risk?Flood risk combines river exposure and local waterlogging vulnerability.

Overall Risk

Lowest

Lower is safer

River Risk

Low

Lower is safer

Waterlogging

Low

Lower is safer

Scoring Breakdown

Parameter	Value	Target / Rule	Status
Overall Risk	Lowest	Low preferred	Info
River Flood Risk	Low	Low preferred	Info
Waterlogging Risk	Low	Low preferred	Info

💡 What does this mean for you?Lower flood risk means less disruption and lower hazard exposure.

🏚️ Earthquake Risk

Final Score: 90.0/100 ↑ Higher is Better

ℹ️ What is Earthquake Risk?Earthquake profile uses seismic zone, PGA and soil/liquefaction risk factors.

Seismic Zone

Zone II

Lower risk zone preferred

Risk Level

Low

Low preferred

Liquefaction

None

Low preferred

Scoring Breakdown

Parameter	Value	Target / Rule	Status
Seismic Zone	Zone II	II preferred	Info
Risk Level	Low	Low preferred	Info
PGA (475yr)	0.0155g	Lower preferred	Info

💡 What does this mean for you?Lower seismic hazard reduces structural and insurance risk exposure.

🌡️ Land Surface Temp

Final Score: 59.1/100 ↑ Higher is Better

ℹ️ What is Land Surface Temp?Land Surface Temperature reflects heat-island intensity from satellite thermal bands.

LST Mean

30.2°C

Lower better

LST Min

10.2°C

Context

LST Max

40.3°C

Lower better

Scoring Breakdown

Parameter	Value	Target / Rule	Status
LST Mean	30.2°C	20°C best / 45°C worst	Weighted by formula
LST Score	59.1	0-100	Computed

Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison

Parameter	1000m	3000m	Average (Final)
LST Mean (°C)	30.1	30.3	30.2
LST Min (°C)	9.9	10.5	10.2
LST Max (°C)	40.3	40.2	40.3
LST Score	59.6	58.7	59.1

💡 What does this mean for you?Higher heat exposure affects comfort, cooling load and health risk.

🏗️ Built-up Density

Final Score: 93.6/100 ↑ Higher is Better

ℹ️ What is Built-up Density?Built-up density measures extent of developed surface versus open space.

Built-up %

6.4%

Lower better

Open Space %

93.6%

Higher better

Built-up Score

93.6

0-100

Scoring Breakdown

Parameter	Value	Target / Rule	Status
Built-up %	6.4%	Inverse scoring	Score = 100 - builtup%
Open Space %	93.6%	Context	Info

Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison

Parameter	1000m	3000m	Average (Final)
Built-up %	1.4%	11.3%	6.4%
Open Space %	98.6%	88.7%	93.6%
Built-up Score	98.6	88.7	93.6

💡 What does this mean for you?Very high built-up often raises heat and runoff while reducing open environmental buffers.

💡 Night-time Lights

Final Score: 16.1/100 ↑ Higher is Better

ℹ️ What is Night-time Lights?Nighttime lights are a proxy for economic activity and electrification intensity.

Avg Radiance

8.04

Higher better

Max Radiance

11.96

Context

NTL Score

16.1

0-100

Scoring Breakdown

Parameter	Value	Target / Rule	Status
Avg Radiance	8.04	Scaled to 50	Score = min(100, avg/50*100)
NTL Score	16.1	0-100	Computed

Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison

Parameter	1000m	3000m	Average (Final)
Avg Radiance	6.43	9.64	8.04
Max Radiance	9.66	14.26	11.96
NTL Score	12.9	19.3	16.1

💡 What does this mean for you?Higher radiance often indicates stronger urban activity but can correlate with light pollution.

🏞️ Water Bodies

Final Score: 100.0/100 ↑ Higher is Better

ℹ️ What is Water Bodies?Water-bodies score reflects permanent and seasonal water presence in the analysis radius.

Permanent Water

45.79%

Higher generally better

Seasonal Water

91.81%

Context

Water Score

100.0

0-100

Scoring Breakdown

Parameter	Value	Target / Rule	Status
Permanent Water %	45.79%	70% weight	Scaled against 10%
Seasonal Water %	91.81%	30% weight	Scaled against 20%
Water Score	100.0	0-100	Computed

Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison

Parameter	1000m	3000m	Average (Final)
Permanent Water %	34.63%	56.94%	45.79%
Seasonal Water %	87.78%	95.83%	91.81%
Water Score	100.0	100.0	100.0

💡 What does this mean for you?Water presence can support cooling, recharge and ecological quality.

👥 Population Density

Final Score: 95.8/100 ↑ Higher is Better

ℹ️ What is Population Density?Population density indicates urban crowding pressure around the area.

Population

15,217

Estimated residents

Density/km²

833.0

Lower better for this score

Score

95.8

0-100

Scoring Breakdown

Parameter	Value	Target / Rule	Status
Density/km²	833.0	Inverse scale up to 20,000	Lower -> higher score
Score	95.8	0-100	Computed

Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison

Parameter	1000m	3000m	Average (Final)
Population Total	2,084	28,350	15,217
Density / km²	663.2	1,002.7	833.0
Pop Density Score	96.7	95.0	95.8

💡 What does this mean for you?Extremely high density can increase pressure on services and mobility.

⛲ Groundwater

Final Score: 60.7/100 ↑ Higher is Better

ℹ️ What is Groundwater?Groundwater score combines moisture, recharge, drought and trend indicators.

Soil Moisture

138.219

Higher better

Recharge

-0.84

Higher better

PDSI

2.66

Higher better

Scoring Breakdown

Parameter	Value	Target / Rule	Status
Soil Moisture	138.219	30% weight	Scaled
Recharge	-0.84	25% weight	Scaled
PDSI	2.66	20% weight	Scaled
SM Trend	-16.4253	15% weight	Scaled
Precipitation	1,852.22	10% weight	Scaled

Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison

Parameter	1000m	3000m	Average (Final)
Soil Moisture	138.533	137.904	138.219
Recharge Estimate	-1.20	-0.48	-0.84
PDSI	2.66	2.65	2.66
Groundwater Score	60.8	60.7	60.7

💡 What does this mean for you?Higher score suggests better long-term aquifer and moisture support conditions.

🚶 Walkability & Safety

↑ Higher is Better

ℹ️ What is Walkability & Safety?OSM amenity metrics reflect pedestrian, safety and urban accessibility infrastructure.

Footpaths

Higher better

Street Lamps

Higher better

Police/Fire Access

Presence

Scoring Breakdown

Parameter	Value	Target / Rule	Status
Footpaths (500m)	0	≥ 3	Concern
Sidewalk Roads (1km)	0	≥ 5	Concern
Nearest Police Station	— m	≤ 2000m	Context

💡 What does this mean for you?Higher OSM accessibility/safety features generally improve everyday livability.

🌬️ Air Quality: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.

Component	Value	Weight/Rule	Contribution
Source	area_scores (latest by score_date)	Pipeline	Weighted model in backend

Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.

Final: See card score

💧 Water Quality: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.

Component	Value	Weight/Rule	Contribution
Source	area_scores (latest by score_date)	Pipeline	Weighted model in backend

Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.

Final: See card score

🛣️ Infrastructure: Infrastructure Score Formula

Formula: Composite weighted model from GHSL/ESA/VIIRS/Terrain features

Component	Value	Weight/Rule	Contribution
Urbanization index	26.17	20%	SMOD
Built-up balance	6.4%	15%	Best in moderate band
NTL stability	68.0%	15%	Power/activity consistency
Avg building height	0.99 m	10%	Vertical infra proxy
Impervious %	5.5%	10%	Moderate is optimal
Radiance	7.79	10%	Development proxy
Slope	0.10°	10%	Flatter is better
Green support	2.5%	10%	Tree + grass contribution

This is the same weighted structure used in Livability Infrastructure model.

Final: 31.97 / 100

🏥 Amenities: Amenity Score Breakdown

Formula: Each amenity category is capped at 100, final score is averaged across categories

Component	Value	Weight/Rule	Contribution
Hospitals 500m	0 * 33	Cap 100	Health access
Schools 1km	0 * 20	Cap 100	Education access
Markets 1km	0 * 33	Cap 100	Daily needs
Parks 500m	0 * 33	Cap 100	Open space
Transit 1km	0 * 50	Cap 100	Mobility

Category multipliers mirror the Livability snapshot logic.

Final: Final from amenity_scores table

🌳 Green Cover: Green Score Formula

Formula: Score = (NDVI*40%) + (Vegetation*30%) + (Dense Green*20%) + (Parks*10%)

Component	Value	Weight/Rule	Contribution
NDVI component	0.252 => 50.4	40%	20.2
Vegetation component	84.1% => 84.1	30%	25.2
Dense green component	1.4% => 2.8	20%	0.6
Parks component	0 => 0.0	10%	0.0

This matches the Livability GreenCover model weighting logic.

Final: 45.95 / 100

🔊 Noise: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.

Component	Value	Weight/Rule	Contribution
Source	area_scores (latest by score_date)	Pipeline	Weighted model in backend

Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.

Final: See card score

🌊 Flood Risk: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.

Component	Value	Weight/Rule	Contribution
Source	area_scores (latest by score_date)	Pipeline	Weighted model in backend

Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.

Final: See card score

🏚️ Earthquake Risk: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.

Component	Value	Weight/Rule	Contribution
Source	area_scores (latest by score_date)	Pipeline	Weighted model in backend

Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.

Final: See card score

🌡️ Land Surface Temp: LST Score Formula

Formula: Score = ((45 - LST Mean) / 25) * 100, clipped to [0,100]

Component	Value	Weight/Rule	Contribution
LST Mean	30.22 °C	Reference	20°C best, 45°C worst

Lower land surface temperature means better livability.

Final: 59.12 / 100

🏗️ Built-up Density: Built-up Score Formula

Formula: Score = 100 - Built-up %

Component	Value	Weight/Rule	Contribution
Built-up %	6.4%	Inverse	Lower is better

Dense concrete surfaces reduce infiltration and increase heat islands.

Final: 93.64 / 100

💡 Night-time Lights: Night-time Lights Formula

Formula: Score = min(100, (Avg Radiance / 50) * 100)

Component	Value	Weight/Rule	Contribution
Avg Radiance	8.04	Scale 0-50	Higher indicates activity

Higher night radiance generally tracks electrification and economic intensity.

Final: 16.07 / 100

🏞️ Water Bodies: Water Bodies Score Formula

Formula: Score = (Permanent Water Score * 70%) + (Seasonal Water Score * 30%)

Component	Value	Weight/Rule	Contribution
Permanent water	45.79%	70%	Scaled against 10% benchmark
Seasonal water	91.81%	30%	Scaled against 20% benchmark

Permanent water has higher score weight than seasonal water.

Final: 100.00 / 100

👥 Population Density: Population Density Formula

Formula: Score = ((20000 - density_per_km²) / 20000) * 100, clipped to [0,100]

Component	Value	Weight/Rule	Contribution
Density	833.0 /km²	Inverse scale	Lower density -> higher score

This follows the Livability PopulationDensity model.

Final: 95.84 / 100

⛲ Groundwater: Groundwater Score Formula

Formula: Weighted: Soil Moisture 30% + Recharge 25% + PDSI 20% + Trend 15% + Precipitation 10%

Component	Value	Weight/Rule	Contribution
Soil moisture	138.219	30%	Scaled to 0-200
Recharge estimate	-0.84	25%	Scaled -200 to +400
PDSI	2.66	20%	Scaled -4 to +4
SM trend	-16.4253	15%	Scaled -50 to +50
Precipitation	1,852.22	10%	Scaled 800 to 1800

Exactly reused from Livability Groundwater model logic.

Final: 60.72 / 100

🚶 Walkability & Safety: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.

Component	Value	Weight/Rule	Contribution
Source	area_scores (latest by score_date)	Pipeline	Weighted model in backend

Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.

Final: See card score

View full livability report for Boriyakala →

Compliance Status

RERA registration, filings, and compliance flags based on public CG-RERA records.

Compliance Status Based on public CG-RERA records

4 Passed

2 N/A

RERA Registration Active

Reg No. PCGRERA250222001345 — Status: New

Section 3 · Source · RERA Official Page

No RERA Orders

No complaints or orders found against this project

Sec 38–63 · Source

No Orders in Last 12 Months

Clean record — no complaints or orders filed

Source

Within Timeline

Target completion: 24 Nov 2026

Section 4 · Source

Quarterly Updates Not Available

No compliance snapshot data on record

Section 11 · Source

Annual Audit Not Available

No compliance snapshot data on record

Section 4(2)(l)(D) · Source

Each check is based on publicly available CG-RERA portal data as of Jun 2026. How this works →

Other Projects by Same Promoter (3)

Project	RERA No.	Status	District	Type
ashoka palm meadows phase (i)	PCGRERA070918000750	Ongoing	Raipur	Plotted Development
ashoka palm meadows phase (ii)	PCGRERA280818000726	Ongoing	Raipur	Residential Development
ASHOKA PALM MEADOWS PHASE-III	PCGRERA280525001934	New	Raipur	Residential Plotted Development

Details

Registration, professional team, bank, promoters, and compliance history.

Registration Details

RERA Number: PCGRERA250222001345
Status: New
Project Type: Residential Plotted Development
Approved Date: 25 Feb 2022
Original End Date: 24 Nov 2026

EWS Category: NO
Construction Cost: ₹ 10353000
Land Cost: ₹ 11137000
Proposed Completion: 24 Nov 2026
Authorised Person: rajesh atlani
Website: www.ashokapalmmeadows.com

View on Map

Professional Team

Role	Name	License / Membership
Statutory CA	PANKAJ JAIN	407917
Quarterly CA	SUMIT BANERJEE	411114
Engineer	SHUBHAM AHUJA	1381/2021
Architect	ANURAG SINGH	CA/2003/31051

Promoters

AARTI COLONIZERS CO. Partnership Firm

Buildings & Units

Inventory overview, sold/unsold breakdown, and building details.

Inventory Overview

Total Inventory

Sold (100%)

Unsold (0%)

Mortgage (0%)

100%

Sold Unsold Mortgage

Quarterly Plot Updates

Period	Total	Sold (prev)	Sold (qtr)	Remaining	Mortgage
2026-01-01 – 2026-03-31	16	16	0	0	0
2025-10-01 – 2025-12-31	16	16	0	0	0
2025-07-01 – 2025-09-30	16	16	0	0	0
2025-04-01 – 2025-06-30	16	16	0	0	0
2025-01-01 – 2025-03-31	16	16	0	0	0
2024-10-01 – 2024-12-31	16	14	2	0	0
2024-07-01 – 2024-09-30	16	14	0	2	0
2024-04-01 – 2024-06-30	16	14	0	2	2
2024-01-01 – 2024-03-31	16	14	0	2	2
2023-10-01 – 2023-12-31	16	14	0	2	2
2023-07-01 – 2023-09-30	16	14	0	2	2
2023-04-01 – 2023-06-30	16	12	2	2	2
2023-01-01 – 2023-03-31	16	8	4	4	2
2022-10-01 – 2022-12-31	16	6	2	8	2
2022-07-01 – 2022-09-30	16	0	7	10	2
2022-04-01 – 2022-06-30	16	0	0	16	2
2022-02-25 – 2022-03-31	16	0	0	16	2

Quarterly Building Updates

Period	Total	Sold (prev)	Sold (qtr)	Remaining	Mortgage
2026-01-01 – 2026-03-31	0	0	0	0	0
2025-10-01 – 2025-12-31	0	0	0	0	0
2025-07-01 – 2025-09-30	0	0	0	0	0
2025-04-01 – 2025-06-30	0	0	0	0	0
2025-01-01 – 2025-03-31	0	0	0	0	0
2024-10-01 – 2024-12-31	0	0	0	0	0
2024-07-01 – 2024-09-30	0	0	0	0	0
2024-04-01 – 2024-06-30	0	0	0	0	0
2024-01-01 – 2024-03-31	0	0	0	0	0
2023-10-01 – 2023-12-31	0	0	0	0	0
2023-07-01 – 2023-09-30	0	0	0	0	0
2023-04-01 – 2023-06-30	0	0	0	0	0
2023-01-01 – 2023-03-31	0	0	0	0	0
2022-10-01 – 2022-12-31	0	0	0	0	0
2022-07-01 – 2022-09-30	0	0	0	0	0
2022-04-01 – 2022-06-30	0	0	0	0	0
2022-02-25 – 2022-03-31	0	0	0	0	0

Quarterly Apartment Updates

Period	Total	Sold (prev)	Sold (qtr)	Remaining	Mortgage
2026-01-01 – 2026-03-31	0	0	0	0	0
2025-10-01 – 2025-12-31	0	0	0	0	0
2025-07-01 – 2025-09-30	0	0	0	0	0
2025-04-01 – 2025-06-30	0	0	0	0	0
2025-01-01 – 2025-03-31	0	0	0	0	0
2024-10-01 – 2024-12-31	0	0	0	0	0
2024-07-01 – 2024-09-30	0	0	0	0	0
2024-04-01 – 2024-06-30	0	0	0	0	0
2024-01-01 – 2024-03-31	0	0	0	0	0
2023-10-01 – 2023-12-31	0	0	0	0	0
2023-07-01 – 2023-09-30	0	0	0	0	0
2023-04-01 – 2023-06-30	0	0	0	0	0
2023-01-01 – 2023-03-31	0	0	0	0	0
2022-10-01 – 2022-12-31	0	0	0	0	0
2022-07-01 – 2022-09-30	0	0	0	0	0
2022-04-01 – 2022-06-30	0	0	0	0	0
2022-02-25 – 2022-03-31	0	0	0	0	0

Legal Orders & Cases

RERA legal orders, complaints, and case statistics filed against this project.

Legal Orders (0)

Complaint	Applicant	Section	Date	Source	PDF
No orders found for this project.

Location

Project address, coordinates, and nearby places.

Location Details

Address: VILLAGE- OLD DHAMTARI ROAD DUNDA TEHSIL-RAIPUR ,DIST-RAIPUR (cg)
District: Raipur
Tehsil: Raipur
Coordinates: 21.1822672, 81.6569082 View on Map

Area Livability

Livability of Boriyakala Raipur

Environmental, infrastructure & amenity parameters for the area where this project is located (1.59 km from project). Each value is compared with the Raipur average.

Composite Livability Score

76.5 / 100

Grade B · Good

+8.0 vs Raipur avg (68.5)

Air Quality

94.0 Excellent

Area

City

-4.6 vs city avg

Water Quality

74.6 Good

Area

City

+6.6 vs city avg

Sanitation

— No data

Area

—

City

No comparison data

Green Cover

41.8 Below Avg

Area

City

+3.3 vs city avg

Noise Level

100.0 Excellent

Area

100

City

+41.7 vs city avg

Infrastructure

31.9 Poor

Area

City

-43.8 vs city avg

Amenities

90.0 Excellent

Area

City

+8.1 vs city avg

Flood Safety

90.0 Excellent

Area

City

+27.8 vs city avg

Earthquake Safety

90.0 Excellent

Area

City

+4.5 vs city avg

Land Surface Temp.

59.1 Average

Area

City

+1.3 vs city avg

Built-up Density

93.6 Excellent

Area

City

+58.1 vs city avg

Night-light Activity

16.1 Poor

Area

City

-38.1 vs city avg

Water Bodies Nearby

100.0 Excellent

Area

100

City

+7.2 vs city avg

Population Density

95.8 Excellent

Area

City

+27.6 vs city avg

Groundwater Status

60.7 Average

Area

City

-2.7 vs city avg

View detailed livability report for Boriyakala

Neighborhood Intelligence

Explore nearby infrastructure around this project. Toggle categories to show/hide on the map.

Neighborhood Map 3 km radius

RERA Projects Near ashoka palm meadows phase-5 30 found within 3 km

#	Project	District	Status	Distance
1	ashoka palm meadows phase (ii)	Raipur	Ongoing	0.16 km
2	ashoka palm meadows phase (i)	Raipur	Ongoing	0.17 km
3	ASHOKA PALM MEADOWS PHASE-III	Raipur	New	0.27 km
4	alaska tower	Raipur	Ongoing	0.29 km
5	CLAY CASTLE	Raipur	Ongoing	0.56 km
6	friend's club	Raipur	Ongoing	0.68 km
7	KINGSTOWN	Raipur	Ongoing	0.73 km
8	EMPRESIA EARTH E-3	Raipur	Ongoing	0.73 km
9	ARZ VIHAR	Raipur	New	0.81 km
10	friends club	Raipur	Ongoing	0.81 km
11	BALAJI VIHAR	Raipur	Ongoing	1.01 km
12	wallfort paradise - i	Raipur	Ongoing	1.12 km
13	wallfort paradise - 03	Raipur	New	1.25 km
14	WALLFORT PARADISE - II	Raipur	Ongoing	1.27 km
15	GOOD LUCK RESIDENCY	Raipur	Ongoing	1.44 km
16	ANANTRA HOMES	Raipur	New	1.52 km
17	anantra homes phase 2	Raipur	New	1.53 km
18	BAGDAI VATIKA (PHASE-2)	Raipur	Ongoing	1.68 km
19	bagdai vatika phase- 1	Raipur	Ongoing	1.70 km
20	GOODLUCK RESIDENCY PHASE -2	Raipur	New	1.71 km
21	AVIVA PRIDE	Raipur	New	1.72 km
22	GANESHA PARK	Raipur	New	1.73 km
23	WALLFORT PANORAMA	Raipur	Ongoing	1.75 km
24	hamar angna	Raipur	New	1.79 km
25	vedanta vihar phase-II	Raipur	New	1.88 km
26	GOODLUCK RESIDENCY PHASE-3	Raipur	New	1.91 km
27	VEDANTA CITY	Raipur	Ongoing	1.92 km
28	VEDANTA VIHAR PHASE-1	Raipur	New	1.95 km
29	solus pearl	Raipur	New	1.98 km
30	AVINASH SMART CITY APARTMENT	Raipur	New	1.98 km

Buyer Checklist

Documents and verifications a buyer should review before purchase.

Buyer Document Verification Checklist

Key documents a buyer should verify before purchasing in this project. Items marked Available have data on Seemankan.

12/14 verified

RERA Registration Certificate Available

Confirms the project is registered with RERA CG. Verify registration number, validity dates, and project details on the RERA portal.

RERA No: PCGRERA250222001345

View on RERA Portal
Promoter Registration Certificate Available

Builder / colonizer company registration certificate. Confirms the promoter entity is a registered firm, company, or society.

Preview Preview
Approved Building / Sanction Plan Available

Building plan sanctioned by the local authority. Verify floor count, setbacks, and FSI compliance.

Preview Preview
Layout Plan Available

Approved layout showing plot divisions, roads, open spaces, and common areas.

Preview
Title Deed / Ownership Proof Available

Proof that the promoter legally owns the land. Verify via Sub-Registrar records.

Preview
Encumbrance Certificate Available

Confirms the property is free from legal dues, mortgages, or liens. Obtain from Sub-Registrar office.

Preview
Land Use / Diversion Certificate Available

Required if land was converted from agricultural to non-agricultural use.

Preview
Architect Certificate Available

Certification from a registered architect confirming structural plans and compliance.

View View View +13 more
Structural Engineer Certificate Available

Certification from a structural engineer confirming building safety and load-bearing capacity.

View View View +13 more
CA Financial Certificate Available

Chartered Accountant certificate on financial status, project cost estimates, and fund utilization.

Preview View View +16 more
Commencement Certificate Available

Permission to begin construction issued by the local authority after plan approval.

Download Download Download +1 more
NOCs (No Objection Certificates) Verify Independently

NOCs from fire department, environment, water supply, electricity board, and other authorities.
Project Brochure / Specification Available

Official brochure with unit types, amenities, and specifications. Compare with actual delivery.

View View View +12 more
RERA Compliance Orders Verify Independently

Check if any orders, penalties, or directions have been issued against this project by RERA.

Risk Zone Within 5 km

Buffer zones (water bodies, airport restrictions) and risk sites (landfills, waste processing) detected within 3 km (immediate) and 5 km (extended) of the project.

Risk zones (within 5 km)

3 km: 1 3–5 km: 5

Water bodies (river/nala/lake)

3 km: 1 3–5 km: 5

Landfill / waste sites

3 km: 0 3–5 km: 0

Airport buffer overlap

3 km: 0 3–5 km: 0

Risk Zone Map (3 km & 5 km rings) Project marker centered

Water Bodies (6)

Birgaon Talab ≤3 km

Tank · 50m buffer

2.85 km
Mandir Hasaud Talab 3–5 km

Tank · 50m buffer

3.17 km
Rajatalab 3–5 km

Tank · 50m buffer

4.02 km
Khamhardih Nala 3–5 km

Drain · 20m buffer

4.23 km
Dunda Talab 3–5 km

Pond · 50m buffer

4.93 km
Dumartarai Reservoir 3–5 km

Reservoir · 75m buffer

4.94 km

Airport (1)

Swami Vivekananda Airport 5–10 km

RPR / VARP · DGCA height limits apply

8.49 km

Documents

RERA-filed documents and disclosures available for this project.

RERA Documents (222)

BRIEF (1)

Preview

BUILDING (1)

Preview

CA (19)

Preview View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View

COLONIZER (1)

Preview

COM (4)

Download Download Download Download

COMMON (1)

Preview

DEV (1)

Preview

DEVE (1)

Preview

DIVERSION (1)

Preview

Demarcation (1)

Preview

ENGG (16)

View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View

ENUM (1)

Preview

FEESHEET (1)

Preview

LAYOUT (1)

Preview

NAZUL (1)

Preview

PASSBOOK (1)

Preview

PHOTO (1)

Download

PLOTPHOTO (112)

PSPEC (1)

Preview

Reg (1)

Preview

SANCTIONBUILDING (1)

Preview

SEARCH (1)

Preview

SELF (1)

Preview

TAC (1)

Preview

other (7)

Preview Preview Preview Preview Preview Preview Preview

Reviews

Verified buyer reviews and ratings for this project.

No reviews yet. Be the first to review this project!

Login to Write a Review

You need to be signed in to submit a review for this project.

ASHOKA PALM MEADOWS PHASE-5

360° Project Intelligence

Livability of Boriyakala

🏠 Livability Parameters

🌬️ Air Quality

💧 Water Quality

🛣️ Infrastructure

🏥 Amenities

🌳 Green Cover

🔊 Noise

🌊 Flood Risk

🏚️ Earthquake Risk

🌡️ Land Surface Temp

🏗️ Built-up Density

💡 Night-time Lights

🏞️ Water Bodies

👥 Population Density

⛲ Groundwater

🚶 Walkability & Safety

🌬️ Air Quality: Score Source

💧 Water Quality: Score Source

🛣️ Infrastructure: Infrastructure Score Formula

🏥 Amenities: Amenity Score Breakdown

🌳 Green Cover: Green Score Formula

🔊 Noise: Score Source

🌊 Flood Risk: Score Source

🏚️ Earthquake Risk: Score Source

🌡️ Land Surface Temp: LST Score Formula

🏗️ Built-up Density: Built-up Score Formula

💡 Night-time Lights: Night-time Lights Formula

🏞️ Water Bodies: Water Bodies Score Formula

👥 Population Density: Population Density Formula

⛲ Groundwater: Groundwater Score Formula

🚶 Walkability & Safety: Score Source

Compliance Status

Details

Buildings & Units

Legal Orders & Cases

Location

Livability of Boriyakala Raipur

Buyer Checklist

Buyer Document Verification Checklist

Risk Zone Within 5 km

Documents

AMOUNT (15)

ARCH (16)

BOROUCHRE (13)

BRIEF (1)

BUILDING (1)

CA (19)

COLONIZER (1)

COM (4)

COMMON (1)

DEV (1)

DEVE (1)

DIVERSION (1)

Demarcation (1)

ENGG (16)

ENUM (1)

FEESHEET (1)

LAYOUT (1)

NAZUL (1)

PASSBOOK (1)

PHOTO (1)

PLOTPHOTO (112)

PSPEC (1)

Reg (1)

SANCTIONBUILDING (1)

SEARCH (1)

SELF (1)

TAC (1)

other (7)

Reviews

Login to Write a Review