Want a full project intelligence report? Download a detailed PDF report — RERA compliance, promoter, financials, amenities, location & risk.

Generate Project Report

ONGOING Residential Development RERA Page Project Website

GENERATE REPORT

PMAY FOR 309 DUS AT RISALI, DURG

21.1607, 81.3469 Explore area

District

Durg

Area

Durg

Promoter

MUNICIPAL CORPORATION RISALI

Project Information

Promoter MUNICIPAL CORPORATION RISALI

Type Residential Development

Status Ongoing

Completion 13 Jun 2027

RERA No. PCGRERA160222001341

Registered 16 Feb 2022

Original End 13 Feb 2027

Total Units 309

EWS Category YES

Construction Cost ₹ 145188000

Land Cost ₹ 300000

Authorised Person ashish dewangan

Address village- risali, tahsil- durg, dist- durg (c.g.)

At a Glance

309

Total Units

Units Sold

Unsold

Legal Cases

Jun 2027

Target Completion

11%

Completion

Amenities & Facilities (9)

BOUNDARY WALL

INTERNAL ROADS AND FOOTPATHS

LANDSCAPING AND TREE PLANTING

OPEN PARKING

SEWERAGE

STORM WATER DRAINS

STREET LIGHTING

WATER CONSERVATION RAIN WATER HARVESTING

WATER SUPPLY

Project Professionals

CA SUMIT KUMAR BHIWANIWALA

STATUTORY CA

TRIPURARI SHARAN JHA

QUARTERLY CA

SAVJANI A&E CONSULTANT

ENGINEER

SAVJANI A&E CONSULTANT

ARCHITECT

Project Analysis

360° Project Intelligence

Comprehensive analysis across regulatory, livability, market, filing activity, and market readiness dimensions.

Regulatory

9 of 14 checks · Moderate Signals

Livability

Risali · Moderate Signals

Legal

No legal orders on record · 11 nearby

Filing Activity

274

220 docs · 54 quarterly updates

Market Readiness

Ongoing · due Jun 2027

Area Livability

Livability of Risali

Eighteen environmental, infrastructure and amenity parameters for the nearest mapped area (Risali — 1.21 km from this project). Click any parameter for the underlying readings, thresholds and what they mean.

🏠 Livability Parameters

Latest readings for Risali. Only parameters with available data are shown below. Based on the latest readings for Risali.

Composite Score

67.3 /100

Good

🌬️ Air Quality

Final Score: 46.0/100 ↑ Higher is Better

ℹ️ What is Air Quality?AQI summarizes PM2.5, PM10 and gases. Lower pollution values improve public health outcomes.

AQI

Satisfactory

PM2.5

11.1 µg/m³

≤ 40

PM10

36.0 µg/m³

≤ 60

Scoring Breakdown

Parameter	Value	Target / Rule	Status
PM2.5	11.1 µg/m³	≤ 40	Good
PM10	36.0 µg/m³	≤ 60	Good
NO₂	14.0 µg/m³	≤ 40	Good

💡 What does this mean for you?Cleaner air lowers respiratory burden and improves outdoor comfort.

💧 Water Quality

Final Score: 75.0/100 ↑ Higher is Better

ℹ️ What is Water Quality?Water quality combines chemistry, supply duration and contamination markers.

TDS

300 ppm

≤ 500

7.30

6.5–8.5

Supply

6.0 hr/day

≥ 8 hr

Scoring Breakdown

Parameter	Value	Target / Rule	Status
TDS	300 ppm	≤ 500	Good
Fluoride	0.60 mg/L	≤ 1.0	Good
Turbidity	3.0 NTU	≤ 1	Concern

💡 What does this mean for you?Better supply quality and consistency reduces dependence on tanker/groundwater fallback.

🧹 Sanitation

Final Score: 65.8/100 ↑ Higher is Better

ℹ️ What is Sanitation?Sanitation reflects ODF status, sewage treatment and waste management regularity.

ODF

ODF+

ODF++

Sewage Coverage

55%

≥ 80%

Drainage

60%

≥ 90%

Scoring Breakdown

Parameter	Value	Target / Rule	Status
ODF Status	ODF+	ODF++	Info
Sewage Coverage	55%	≥ 80%	Concern
Drainage Coverage	60%	≥ 90%	Concern

💡 What does this mean for you?Higher sanitation maturity lowers disease exposure and neighborhood nuisance.

🛣️ Infrastructure

Final Score: 67.4/100 ↑ Higher is Better

ℹ️ What is Infrastructure?Infrastructure score combines land use, urbanization, built form, night lights and terrain indicators.

Built-up

56.4%

Balanced band

Tree Cover

11.2%

≥ 15%

Urbanization

90.2

Higher better

Scoring Breakdown

Parameter	Value	Target / Rule	Status
Built-up (LULC)	56.4%	40-70%	Contextual
Impervious Surface	28.9%	< 70%	Good
NDVI Mean	0.240	> 0.3	Concern

Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison

Parameter	1000m	3000m	Average (Final)
Built-up (LULC) %	76.5%	36.2%	56.4%
Tree Cover %	3.6%	18.8%	11.2%
Urbanization Index	98.9	81.5	90.2
Infra Score	73.1	61.7	71.4

💡 What does this mean for you?Balanced built + green mix usually improves long-term livability resilience.

🏥 Amenities

Final Score: 86.4/100 ↑ Higher is Better

ℹ️ What is Amenities?Amenity score captures daily-access services in walk/short-drive radii.

Hospitals 500m

Target ≥1

Schools 1km

Target ≥3

Parks 500m

Target ≥1

Scoring Breakdown

Parameter	Value	Target / Rule	Status
Hospitals (500m)	5	≥1	Good
Schools (1km)	20	≥3	Good
Markets (1km)	20	≥1	Good

💡 What does this mean for you?Higher local amenity density improves convenience and walkability.

🌳 Green Cover

Final Score: 47.2/100 ↑ Higher is Better

ℹ️ What is Green Cover?NDVI and vegetation structure are measured from satellite imagery to estimate neighborhood greenery.

NDVI Mean

0.198

Greenness index

Vegetation

45.2%

% green pixels

Dense Green

0.8%

Thick canopy

Scoring Breakdown

Parameter	Value	Target / Rule	Status
NDVI Mean	0.198	0.5 maps to score 100	Weighted 40%
Vegetation %	45.2%	Direct % (cap 100)	Weighted 30%
Dense Green %	0.8%	Scaled from 50%	Weighted 20%
Parks within 500m	5	Count * 33 (cap 100)	Weighted 10%

Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison

Parameter	1000m	3000m	Average (Final)
NDVI Mean	0.174	0.222	0.198
Vegetation %	27.7%	62.7%	45.2%
Dense Green %	0.0%	1.5%	0.8%
Tree Canopy %	0.0%	1.1%	0.6%
Green Score	32.2	47.2	39.7

💡 What does this mean for you?Higher green metrics typically reduce heat stress and improve comfort.

🔊 Noise

Final Score: 77.2/100 ↑ Higher is Better

ℹ️ What is Noise?Noise uses measured day/night dB compared to CPCB zone limits.

Day dB

47.7

vs CPCB day limit

Night dB

42.3

vs CPCB night limit

Zone

commercial

CPCB class

Scoring Breakdown

Parameter	Value	Target / Rule	Status
Day Noise	47.7 dB	≤ 65.0 dB	Good
Night Noise	42.3 dB	≤ 55.0 dB	Good
Nearest Highway	— m	Higher usually quieter	Info

💡 What does this mean for you?Chronic high noise impacts stress, sleep quality and perceived comfort.

🌊 Flood Risk

Final Score: 72.5/100 ↑ Higher is Better

ℹ️ What is Flood Risk?Flood risk combines river exposure and local waterlogging vulnerability.

Overall Risk

Low

Lower is safer

River Risk

Low

Lower is safer

Waterlogging

Low-Medium

Lower is safer

Scoring Breakdown

Parameter	Value	Target / Rule	Status
Overall Risk	Low	Low preferred	Info
River Flood Risk	Low	Low preferred	Info
Waterlogging Risk	Low-Medium	Low preferred	Info

💡 What does this mean for you?Lower flood risk means less disruption and lower hazard exposure.

🏚️ Earthquake Risk

Final Score: 90.0/100 ↑ Higher is Better

ℹ️ What is Earthquake Risk?Earthquake profile uses seismic zone, PGA and soil/liquefaction risk factors.

Seismic Zone

Zone II

Lower risk zone preferred

Risk Level

Low

Low preferred

Liquefaction

None

Low preferred

Scoring Breakdown

Parameter	Value	Target / Rule	Status
Seismic Zone	Zone II	II preferred	Info
Risk Level	Low	Low preferred	Info
PGA (475yr)	0.0155g	Lower preferred	Info

💡 What does this mean for you?Lower seismic hazard reduces structural and insurance risk exposure.

🌡️ Land Surface Temp

Final Score: 59.8/100 ↑ Higher is Better

ℹ️ What is Land Surface Temp?Land Surface Temperature reflects heat-island intensity from satellite thermal bands.

LST Mean

30.1°C

Lower better

LST Min

15.7°C

Context

LST Max

40.8°C

Lower better

Scoring Breakdown

Parameter	Value	Target / Rule	Status
LST Mean	30.1°C	20°C best / 45°C worst	Weighted by formula
LST Score	59.8	0-100	Computed

Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison

Parameter	1000m	3000m	Average (Final)
LST Mean (°C)	30.2	29.9	30.1
LST Min (°C)	16.5	14.8	15.7
LST Max (°C)	41.2	40.3	40.8
LST Score	59.3	60.2	59.8

💡 What does this mean for you?Higher heat exposure affects comfort, cooling load and health risk.

🏗️ Built-up Density

Final Score: 43.6/100 ↑ Higher is Better

ℹ️ What is Built-up Density?Built-up density measures extent of developed surface versus open space.

Built-up %

76.5%

Lower better

Open Space %

23.5%

Higher better

Built-up Score

23.5

0-100

Scoring Breakdown

Parameter	Value	Target / Rule	Status
Built-up %	76.5%	Inverse scoring	Score = 100 - builtup%
Open Space %	23.5%	Context	Info

💡 What does this mean for you?Very high built-up often raises heat and runoff while reducing open environmental buffers.

💡 Night-time Lights

Final Score: 33.2/100 ↑ Higher is Better

ℹ️ What is Night-time Lights?Nighttime lights are a proxy for economic activity and electrification intensity.

Avg Radiance

16.62

Higher better

Max Radiance

24.95

Context

NTL Score

33.2

0-100

Scoring Breakdown

Parameter	Value	Target / Rule	Status
Avg Radiance	16.62	Scaled to 50	Score = min(100, avg/50*100)
NTL Score	33.2	0-100	Computed

Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison

Parameter	1000m	3000m	Average (Final)
Avg Radiance	19.07	14.16	16.62
Max Radiance	28.45	21.46	24.95
NTL Score	38.1	28.3	33.2

💡 What does this mean for you?Higher radiance often indicates stronger urban activity but can correlate with light pollution.

🏞️ Water Bodies

Final Score: 100.0/100 ↑ Higher is Better

ℹ️ What is Water Bodies?Water-bodies score reflects permanent and seasonal water presence in the analysis radius.

Permanent Water

72.21%

Higher generally better

Seasonal Water

98.38%

Context

Water Score

100.0

0-100

Scoring Breakdown

Parameter	Value	Target / Rule	Status
Permanent Water %	72.21%	70% weight	Scaled against 10%
Seasonal Water %	98.38%	30% weight	Scaled against 20%
Water Score	100.0	0-100	Computed

Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison

Parameter	1000m	3000m	Average (Final)
Permanent Water %	60.11%	84.30%	72.21%
Seasonal Water %	97.93%	98.82%	98.38%
Water Score	100.0	100.0	100.0

💡 What does this mean for you?Water presence can support cooling, recharge and ecological quality.

👥 Population Density

Final Score: 71.1/100 ↑ Higher is Better

ℹ️ What is Population Density?Population density indicates urban crowding pressure around the area.

Population

66,025

Estimated residents

Density/km²

5,785.4

Lower better for this score

Score

71.1

0-100

Scoring Breakdown

Parameter	Value	Target / Rule	Status
Density/km²	5,785.4	Inverse scale up to 20,000	Lower -> higher score
Score	71.1	0-100	Computed

Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison

Parameter	1000m	3000m	Average (Final)
Population Total	24,388	107,661	66,025
Density / km²	7,763.0	3,807.7	5,785.4
Pop Density Score	61.2	81.0	71.1

💡 What does this mean for you?Extremely high density can increase pressure on services and mobility.

🚶 Walkability & Safety

↑ Higher is Better

ℹ️ What is Walkability & Safety?OSM amenity metrics reflect pedestrian, safety and urban accessibility infrastructure.

Footpaths

Higher better

Street Lamps

Higher better

Police/Fire Access

Presence

Scoring Breakdown

Parameter	Value	Target / Rule	Status
Footpaths (500m)	0	≥ 3	Concern
Sidewalk Roads (1km)	0	≥ 5	Concern
Nearest Police Station	— m	≤ 2000m	Context

💡 What does this mean for you?Higher OSM accessibility/safety features generally improve everyday livability.

🌬️ Air Quality: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.

Component	Value	Weight/Rule	Contribution
Source	area_scores (latest by score_date)	Pipeline	Weighted model in backend

Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.

Final: See card score

💧 Water Quality: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.

Component	Value	Weight/Rule	Contribution
Source	area_scores (latest by score_date)	Pipeline	Weighted model in backend

Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.

Final: See card score

🧹 Sanitation: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.

Component	Value	Weight/Rule	Contribution
Source	area_scores (latest by score_date)	Pipeline	Weighted model in backend

Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.

Final: See card score

🛣️ Infrastructure: Infrastructure Score Formula

Formula: Composite weighted model from GHSL/ESA/VIIRS/Terrain features

Component	Value	Weight/Rule	Contribution
Urbanization index	90.21	20%	SMOD
Built-up balance	56.4%	15%	Best in moderate band
NTL stability	65.0%	15%	Power/activity consistency
Avg building height	5.09 m	10%	Vertical infra proxy
Impervious %	28.9%	10%	Moderate is optimal
Radiance	17.40	10%	Development proxy
Slope	0.10°	10%	Flatter is better
Green support	11.2%	10%	Tree + grass contribution

This is the same weighted structure used in Livability Infrastructure model.

Final: 71.35 / 100

🏥 Amenities: Amenity Score Breakdown

Formula: Each amenity category is capped at 100, final score is averaged across categories

Component	Value	Weight/Rule	Contribution
Hospitals 500m	5 * 33	Cap 100	Health access
Schools 1km	20 * 20	Cap 100	Education access
Markets 1km	20 * 33	Cap 100	Daily needs
Parks 500m	5 * 33	Cap 100	Open space
Transit 1km	0 * 50	Cap 100	Mobility

Category multipliers mirror the Livability snapshot logic.

Final: Final from amenity_scores table

🌳 Green Cover: Green Score Formula

Formula: Score = (NDVI*40%) + (Vegetation*30%) + (Dense Green*20%) + (Parks*10%)

Component	Value	Weight/Rule	Contribution
NDVI component	0.198 => 39.6	40%	15.8
Vegetation component	45.2% => 45.2	30%	13.6
Dense green component	0.8% => 1.6	20%	0.3
Parks component	5 => 100.0	10%	10.0

This matches the Livability GreenCover model weighting logic.

Final: 39.71 / 100

🔊 Noise: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.

Component	Value	Weight/Rule	Contribution
Source	area_scores (latest by score_date)	Pipeline	Weighted model in backend

Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.

Final: See card score

🌊 Flood Risk: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.

Component	Value	Weight/Rule	Contribution
Source	area_scores (latest by score_date)	Pipeline	Weighted model in backend

Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.

Final: See card score

🏚️ Earthquake Risk: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.

Component	Value	Weight/Rule	Contribution
Source	area_scores (latest by score_date)	Pipeline	Weighted model in backend

Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.

Final: See card score

🌡️ Land Surface Temp: LST Score Formula

Formula: Score = ((45 - LST Mean) / 25) * 100, clipped to [0,100]

Component	Value	Weight/Rule	Contribution
LST Mean	30.06 °C	Reference	20°C best, 45°C worst

Lower land surface temperature means better livability.

Final: 59.76 / 100

🏗️ Built-up Density: Built-up Score Formula

Formula: Score = 100 - Built-up %

Component	Value	Weight/Rule	Contribution
Built-up %	76.5%	Inverse	Lower is better

Dense concrete surfaces reduce infiltration and increase heat islands.

Final: 23.51 / 100

💡 Night-time Lights: Night-time Lights Formula

Formula: Score = min(100, (Avg Radiance / 50) * 100)

Component	Value	Weight/Rule	Contribution
Avg Radiance	16.62	Scale 0-50	Higher indicates activity

Higher night radiance generally tracks electrification and economic intensity.

Final: 33.23 / 100

🏞️ Water Bodies: Water Bodies Score Formula

Formula: Score = (Permanent Water Score * 70%) + (Seasonal Water Score * 30%)

Component	Value	Weight/Rule	Contribution
Permanent water	72.21%	70%	Scaled against 10% benchmark
Seasonal water	98.38%	30%	Scaled against 20% benchmark

Permanent water has higher score weight than seasonal water.

Final: 100.00 / 100

👥 Population Density: Population Density Formula

Formula: Score = ((20000 - density_per_km²) / 20000) * 100, clipped to [0,100]

Component	Value	Weight/Rule	Contribution
Density	5,785.4 /km²	Inverse scale	Lower density -> higher score

This follows the Livability PopulationDensity model.

Final: 71.07 / 100

🚶 Walkability & Safety: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.

Component	Value	Weight/Rule	Contribution
Source	area_scores (latest by score_date)	Pipeline	Weighted model in backend

Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.

Final: See card score

View full livability report for Risali →

Compliance Status

RERA registration, filings, and compliance flags based on public CG-RERA records.

Compliance Status Based on public CG-RERA records

4 Passed

2 N/A

RERA Registration Active

Reg No. PCGRERA160222001341 — Status: Ongoing

Section 3 · Source · RERA Official Page

No RERA Orders

No complaints or orders found against this project

Sec 38–63 · Source

No Orders in Last 12 Months

Clean record — no complaints or orders filed

Source

Within Timeline

Target completion: 13 Jun 2027

Section 4 · Source

Quarterly Updates Not Available

No compliance snapshot data on record

Section 11 · Source

Annual Audit Not Available

No compliance snapshot data on record

Section 4(2)(l)(D) · Source

Each check is based on publicly available CG-RERA portal data as of Nov 2026. How this works →

Other Projects by Same Promoter (1)

Project	RERA No.	Status	District	Type
PMAY FOR 812 DUs at risali, durg	PCGRERA160222001340	Ongoing	Durg	Residential Development

Details

Registration, professional team, bank, promoters, and compliance history.

Registration Details

RERA Number: PCGRERA160222001341
Status: Ongoing
Project Type: Residential Development
Approved Date: 16 Feb 2022
Original End Date: 13 Feb 2027

EWS Category: YES
Construction Cost: ₹ 145188000
Land Cost: ₹ 300000
Proposed Completion: 13 Jun 2027
Authorised Person: ashish dewangan

View on Map

Professional Team

Role	Name	License / Membership
Statutory CA	CA SUMIT KUMAR BHIWANIWALA	139779
Quarterly CA	TRIPURARI SHARAN JHA	312441
Engineer	Savjani A&E consultant	ER1388110924
Architect	Savjani A&E consultant	ER1388110924

Promoters

municipal corporation risali Government/Semi Government Agency

Buildings & Units

Inventory overview, sold/unsold breakdown, and building details.

Inventory Overview

309

Total Inventory

Sold (0%)

Unsold (0%)

309

Mortgage (100%)

100%

Sold Unsold Mortgage

Quarterly Plot Updates

Period	Total	Sold (prev)	Sold (qtr)	Remaining	Mortgage
2026-04-01 – 2026-06-30	0	0	0	0	0
2026-01-01 – 2026-03-31	0	0	0	0	0
2025-10-01 – 2025-12-31	0	0	0	0	0
2025-07-01 – 2025-09-30	0	0	0	0	0
2025-04-01 – 2025-06-30	0	0	0	0	0
2025-01-01 – 2025-03-31	0	0	0	0	0
2024-10-01 – 2024-12-31	0	0	0	0	0
2024-07-01 – 2024-09-30	0	0	0	0	0
2024-04-01 – 2024-06-30	0	0	0	0	0
2024-01-01 – 2024-03-31	0	0	0	0	0
2023-10-01 – 2023-12-31	0	0	0	0	0
2023-07-01 – 2023-09-30	0	0	0	0	0
2023-04-01 – 2023-06-30	0	0	0	0	0
2023-01-01 – 2023-03-31	0	0	0	0	0
2022-10-01 – 2022-12-31	0	0	0	0	0
2022-07-01 – 2022-09-30	0	0	0	0	0
2022-04-01 – 2022-06-30	0	0	0	0	0
2022-01-01 – 2022-03-31	0	0	0	0	0

Quarterly Building Updates

Period	Total	Sold (prev)	Sold (qtr)	Remaining	Mortgage
2026-04-01 – 2026-06-30	0	0	0	0	0
2026-01-01 – 2026-03-31	0	0	0	0	0
2025-10-01 – 2025-12-31	0	0	0	0	0
2025-07-01 – 2025-09-30	0	0	0	0	0
2025-04-01 – 2025-06-30	0	0	0	0	0
2025-01-01 – 2025-03-31	0	0	0	0	0
2024-10-01 – 2024-12-31	0	0	0	0	0
2024-07-01 – 2024-09-30	0	0	0	0	0
2024-04-01 – 2024-06-30	0	0	0	0	0
2024-01-01 – 2024-03-31	0	0	0	0	0
2023-10-01 – 2023-12-31	0	0	0	0	0
2023-07-01 – 2023-09-30	0	0	0	0	0
2023-04-01 – 2023-06-30	0	0	0	0	0
2023-01-01 – 2023-03-31	0	0	0	0	0
2022-10-01 – 2022-12-31	0	0	0	0	0
2022-07-01 – 2022-09-30	0	0	0	0	0
2022-04-01 – 2022-06-30	0	0	0	0	0
2022-01-01 – 2022-03-31	0	0	0	0	0

Quarterly Apartment Updates

Period	Total	Remaining	Mortgage
2026-04-01 – 2026-06-30	309	309	309
2026-01-01 – 2026-03-31	309	309	309
2025-10-01 – 2025-12-31	309	309	309
2025-07-01 – 2025-09-30	309	309	309
2025-04-01 – 2025-06-30	309	309	309
2025-01-01 – 2025-03-31	309	309	309
2024-10-01 – 2024-12-31	309	309	309
2024-07-01 – 2024-09-30	309	309	309
2024-04-01 – 2024-06-30	309	309	309
2024-01-01 – 2024-03-31	309	309	309
2023-10-01 – 2023-12-31	145	145	0
2023-07-01 – 2023-09-30	145	145	0
2023-04-01 – 2023-06-30	145	145	0
2023-01-01 – 2023-03-31	145	145	0
2022-10-01 – 2022-12-31	145	145	0
2022-07-01 – 2022-09-30	145	145	0
2022-04-01 – 2022-06-30	145	145	0
2022-01-01 – 2022-03-31	145	145	0

Legal Orders & Cases

RERA legal orders, complaints, and case statistics filed against this project.

Legal Orders (0)

Complaint	Applicant	Section	Date	Source	PDF
No orders found for this project.

Location

Project address, coordinates, and nearby places.

Location Details

Address: village- risali, tahsil- durg, dist- durg (c.g.)
District: Durg
Tehsil: Durg
Coordinates: 21.1607004, 81.3469224 View on Map

Stored 3km Amenities (Latest Refresh)

Amenity	Count	Coverage
BOUNDARY WALL	—	0%
INTERNAL ROADS AND FOOTPATHS	—	0%
LANDSCAPING AND TREE PLANTING	—	0%
OPEN PARKING	—	0%
SEWERAGE	—	0%
STORM WATER DRAINS	—	0%
STREET LIGHTING	—	0%
WATER CONSERVATION RAIN WATER HARVESTING	—	0%
WATER SUPPLY	—	0%

Area Livability

Livability of Risali Bhilai

Environmental, infrastructure & amenity parameters for the area where this project is located (1.21 km from project). Each value is compared with the Bhilai average.

Composite Livability Score

67.3 / 100

Grade B · Good

+1.0 vs Bhilai avg (66.3)

Air Quality

46.0 Below Avg

Area

City

+1.0 vs city avg

Water Quality

75.0 Good

Area

City

+1.1 vs city avg

Sanitation

65.8 Good

Area

City

-2.1 vs city avg

Green Cover

47.2 Below Avg

Area

City

+8.8 vs city avg

Noise Level

77.2 Good

Area

City

-11.5 vs city avg

Infrastructure

67.4 Good

Area

City

-5.3 vs city avg

Amenities

86.4 Excellent

Area

City

+14.1 vs city avg

Flood Safety

72.5 Good

Area

City

-1.3 vs city avg

Earthquake Safety

90.0 Excellent

Area

City

+0.0 vs city avg

Land Surface Temp.

59.8 Average

Area

City

-0.3 vs city avg

Built-up Density

43.6 Below Avg

Area

City

+0.2 vs city avg

Night-light Activity

33.2 Poor

Area

City

-12.3 vs city avg

Water Bodies Nearby

100.0 Excellent

Area

100

City

+14.5 vs city avg

Population Density

71.1 Good

Area

City

+4.8 vs city avg

Groundwater Status

57.5 Average

Area

City

-1.6 vs city avg

View detailed livability report for Risali

Neighborhood Intelligence

Explore nearby infrastructure around this project. Toggle categories to show/hide on the map.

Neighborhood Map 3 km radius

RERA Projects Near pmay for 309 dus at risali, durg 11 found within 3 km

#	Project	District	Status	Distance
1	laxmi green city, block - a	Durg	New	0.71 km
2	LAXMI SKY LIFE	Durg	New	0.90 km
3	laxmi vila	Durg	New	0.90 km
4	YASH LAKEVIEW	Durg	Ongoing	0.98 km
5	pmay of 42(444) dus at laxmi builders risali durg	Durg	Ongoing	1.17 km
6	LAXMI TOWN PHASE-1	Durg	New	1.27 km
7	LAXMI HEIGHT	Durg	New	1.74 km
8	AKRITI RESIDENCY	Durg	Ongoing	1.98 km
9	SHUBHKAMNA HEIGHTS	Durg	Ongoing	2.11 km
10	MAPLE	Durg	Ongoing	2.75 km
11	ROYAL TOWN	Durg	New	2.86 km

Buyer Checklist

Documents and verifications a buyer should review before purchase.

Buyer Document Verification Checklist

Key documents a buyer should verify before purchasing in this project. Items marked Available have data on Seemankan.

8/14 verified

RERA Registration Certificate Available

Confirms the project is registered with RERA CG. Verify registration number, validity dates, and project details on the RERA portal.

RERA No: PCGRERA160222001341

View on RERA Portal
Promoter Registration Certificate Available

Builder / colonizer company registration certificate. Confirms the promoter entity is a registered firm, company, or society.

Preview Preview
Approved Building / Sanction Plan Available

Building plan sanctioned by the local authority. Verify floor count, setbacks, and FSI compliance.

Preview Preview
Layout Plan Available

Approved layout showing plot divisions, roads, open spaces, and common areas.

Preview
Title Deed / Ownership Proof Verify Independently

Proof that the promoter legally owns the land. Verify via Sub-Registrar records.
Encumbrance Certificate Verify Independently

Confirms the property is free from legal dues, mortgages, or liens. Obtain from Sub-Registrar office.
Land Use / Diversion Certificate Verify Independently

Required if land was converted from agricultural to non-agricultural use.
Architect Certificate Available

Certification from a registered architect confirming structural plans and compliance.

View View View +16 more
Structural Engineer Certificate Available

Certification from a structural engineer confirming building safety and load-bearing capacity.

View View View +16 more
CA Financial Certificate Available

Chartered Accountant certificate on financial status, project cost estimates, and fund utilization.

Preview View View +17 more
Commencement Certificate Verify Independently

Permission to begin construction issued by the local authority after plan approval.
NOCs (No Objection Certificates) Verify Independently

NOCs from fire department, environment, water supply, electricity board, and other authorities.
Project Brochure / Specification Available

Official brochure with unit types, amenities, and specifications. Compare with actual delivery.

View View View +18 more
RERA Compliance Orders Verify Independently

Check if any orders, penalties, or directions have been issued against this project by RERA.

Risk Zone Within 5 km

Buffer zones (water bodies, airport restrictions) and risk sites (landfills, waste processing) detected within 3 km (immediate) and 5 km (extended) of the project.

Risk zones (within 5 km)

3 km: 0 3–5 km: 0

Water bodies (river/nala/lake)

3 km: 0 3–5 km: 0

Landfill / waste sites

3 km: 0 3–5 km: 0

Airport buffer overlap

3 km: 0 3–5 km: 0

Risk Zone Map (3 km & 5 km rings) Project marker centered

All Clear

No mapped risk zones within 3 km of this project.

Documents

RERA-filed documents and disclosures available for this project.

RERA Documents (220)

APARTMENTPHOTO (122)

ARCH (19)

View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View

BOROUCHRE (19)

View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View

BRIEF (1)

Preview

BUILDING (1)

Preview

CA (20)

Preview View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View

COLONIZER (1)

Preview

COMMON (1)

Preview

DEVE (1)

Preview

Dev (1)

Preview

ENGG (19)

View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View

FEESHEET (1)

Preview

LAYOUT (1)

Preview

PASSBOOK (1)

Preview

PHOTO (1)

Download

PSPEC (1)

Preview

Reg (1)

Preview

SANCTIONBUILDING (1)

Preview

SELF (1)

Preview

TAC (1)

Preview

other (6)

Preview Preview Preview Preview Preview Preview

Reviews

Verified buyer reviews and ratings for this project.

No reviews yet. Be the first to review this project!

Login to Write a Review

You need to be signed in to submit a review for this project.

Log in to see the full page

This page shows a preview. Sign in (or create a free account) to unlock the full content, charts, and downloads.