Eighteen environmental, infrastructure and amenity parameters for the nearest mapped area (Ramsagar Para — 0.34 km from this project). Click any parameter for the underlying readings, thresholds and what they mean.

🏠 Livability Parameters

Latest readings for Ramsagar Para. Only parameters with available data are shown below. Based on the latest readings for Ramsagar Para.

Composite Score

65.0 /100

Good

🌬️ Air Quality

Final Score: 90.0/100 ↑ Higher is Better

ℹ️ What is Air Quality?AQI summarizes PM2.5, PM10 and gases. Lower pollution values improve public health outcomes.

AQI

Satisfactory

PM2.5

26.1 µg/m³

≤ 40

PM10

242.6 µg/m³

≤ 60

Scoring Breakdown

Parameter	Value	Target / Rule	Status
PM2.5	26.1 µg/m³	≤ 40	Good
PM10	242.6 µg/m³	≤ 60	Concern
NO₂	26.5 µg/m³	≤ 40	Good

💡 What does this mean for you?Cleaner air lowers respiratory burden and improves outdoor comfort.

💧 Water Quality

Final Score: 74.4/100 ↑ Higher is Better

ℹ️ What is Water Quality?Water quality combines chemistry, supply duration and contamination markers.

TDS

373 ppm

≤ 500

7.24

6.5–8.5

Supply

5.4 hr/day

≥ 8 hr

Scoring Breakdown

Parameter	Value	Target / Rule	Status
TDS	373 ppm	≤ 500	Good
Fluoride	0.69 mg/L	≤ 1.0	Good
Turbidity	5.4 NTU	≤ 1	Concern

💡 What does this mean for you?Better supply quality and consistency reduces dependence on tanker/groundwater fallback.

🧹 Sanitation

Final Score: 62.8/100 ↑ Higher is Better

ℹ️ What is Sanitation?Sanitation reflects ODF status, sewage treatment and waste management regularity.

ODF

ODF+

ODF++

Sewage Coverage

50%

≥ 80%

Drainage

60%

≥ 90%

Scoring Breakdown

Parameter	Value	Target / Rule	Status
ODF Status	ODF+	ODF++	Info
Sewage Coverage	50%	≥ 80%	Concern
Drainage Coverage	60%	≥ 90%	Concern

💡 What does this mean for you?Higher sanitation maturity lowers disease exposure and neighborhood nuisance.

🛣️ Infrastructure

Final Score: 77.4/100 ↑ Higher is Better

ℹ️ What is Infrastructure?Infrastructure score combines land use, urbanization, built form, night lights and terrain indicators.

Built-up

82.1%

Balanced band

Tree Cover

10.1%

≥ 15%

Urbanization

100.0

Higher better

Scoring Breakdown

Parameter	Value	Target / Rule	Status
Built-up (LULC)	82.1%	40-70%	Contextual
Impervious Surface	57.7%	< 70%	Good
NDVI Mean	0.210	> 0.3	Concern

Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison

Parameter	1000m	3000m	Average (Final)
Built-up (LULC) %	88.2%	76.1%	82.1%
Tree Cover %	6.3%	13.8%	10.1%
Urbanization Index	100.0	100.0	100.0
Infra Score	74.0	80.9	77.8

💡 What does this mean for you?Balanced built + green mix usually improves long-term livability resilience.

🏥 Amenities

Final Score: 85.8/100 ↑ Higher is Better

ℹ️ What is Amenities?Amenity score captures daily-access services in walk/short-drive radii.

Hospitals 500m

Target ≥1

Schools 1km

Target ≥3

Parks 500m

Target ≥1

Scoring Breakdown

Parameter	Value	Target / Rule	Status
Hospitals (500m)	0	≥1	Concern
Schools (1km)	4	≥3	Good
Markets (1km)	3	≥1	Good

💡 What does this mean for you?Higher local amenity density improves convenience and walkability.

🌳 Green Cover

Final Score: 44.5/100 ↑ Higher is Better

ℹ️ What is Green Cover?NDVI and vegetation structure are measured from satellite imagery to estimate neighborhood greenery.

NDVI Mean

0.262

Greenness index

Vegetation

24.2%

% green pixels

Dense Green

11.0%

Thick canopy

Scoring Breakdown

Parameter	Value	Target / Rule	Status
NDVI Mean	0.262	0.5 maps to score 100	Weighted 40%
Vegetation %	24.2%	Direct % (cap 100)	Weighted 30%
Dense Green %	11.0%	Scaled from 50%	Weighted 20%
Parks within 500m	2	Count * 33 (cap 100)	Weighted 10%

Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison

Parameter	1000m	3000m	Average (Final)
NDVI Mean	0.208	0.315	0.262
Vegetation %	23.9%	24.4%	24.2%
Dense Green %	8.6%	13.4%	11.0%
Tree Canopy %	21.0%	20.7%	20.9%
Green Score	33.9	44.5	39.2

💡 What does this mean for you?Higher green metrics typically reduce heat stress and improve comfort.

🔊 Noise

Final Score: 100.0/100 ↑ Higher is Better

ℹ️ What is Noise?Noise uses measured day/night dB compared to CPCB zone limits.

Day dB

55.0

vs CPCB day limit

Night dB

49.9

vs CPCB night limit

Zone

residential

CPCB class

Scoring Breakdown

Parameter	Value	Target / Rule	Status
Day Noise	55.0 dB	≤ 55.0 dB	Good
Night Noise	49.9 dB	≤ 45.0 dB	Concern
Nearest Highway	— m	Higher usually quieter	Info

💡 What does this mean for you?Chronic high noise impacts stress, sleep quality and perceived comfort.

🌊 Flood Risk

Final Score: 40.0/100 ↑ Higher is Better

ℹ️ What is Flood Risk?Flood risk combines river exposure and local waterlogging vulnerability.

Overall Risk

Medium

Lower is safer

River Risk

Medium

Lower is safer

Waterlogging

Medium

Lower is safer

Scoring Breakdown

Parameter	Value	Target / Rule	Status
Overall Risk	Medium	Low preferred	Info
River Flood Risk	Medium	Low preferred	Info
Waterlogging Risk	Medium	Low preferred	Info

💡 What does this mean for you?Lower flood risk means less disruption and lower hazard exposure.

🏚️ Earthquake Risk

Final Score: 10.0/100 ↑ Higher is Better

ℹ️ What is Earthquake Risk?Earthquake profile uses seismic zone, PGA and soil/liquefaction risk factors.

Seismic Zone

Zone II

Lower risk zone preferred

Risk Level

Low

Low preferred

Liquefaction

None

Low preferred

Scoring Breakdown

Parameter	Value	Target / Rule	Status
Seismic Zone	Zone II	II preferred	Info
Risk Level	Low	Low preferred	Info
PGA (475yr)	0.0155g	Lower preferred	Info

💡 What does this mean for you?Lower seismic hazard reduces structural and insurance risk exposure.

🌡️ Land Surface Temp

Final Score: 53.1/100 ↑ Higher is Better

ℹ️ What is Land Surface Temp?Land Surface Temperature reflects heat-island intensity from satellite thermal bands.

LST Mean

31.7°C

Lower better

LST Min

24.8°C

Context

LST Max

40.9°C

Lower better

Scoring Breakdown

Parameter	Value	Target / Rule	Status
LST Mean	31.7°C	20°C best / 45°C worst	Weighted by formula
LST Score	53.1	0-100	Computed

Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison

Parameter	1000m	3000m	Average (Final)
LST Mean (°C)	32.4	31.1	31.7
LST Min (°C)	26.3	23.4	24.8
LST Max (°C)	41.7	40.1	40.9
LST Score	50.6	55.6	53.1

💡 What does this mean for you?Higher heat exposure affects comfort, cooling load and health risk.

🏗️ Built-up Density

Final Score: 17.9/100 ↑ Higher is Better

ℹ️ What is Built-up Density?Built-up density measures extent of developed surface versus open space.

Built-up %

82.1%

Lower better

Open Space %

17.9%

Higher better

Built-up Score

17.9

0-100

Scoring Breakdown

Parameter	Value	Target / Rule	Status
Built-up %	82.1%	Inverse scoring	Score = 100 - builtup%
Open Space %	17.9%	Context	Info

Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison

Parameter	1000m	3000m	Average (Final)
Built-up %	88.2%	76.1%	82.1%
Open Space %	11.8%	23.9%	17.9%
Built-up Score	11.8	23.9	17.9

💡 What does this mean for you?Very high built-up often raises heat and runoff while reducing open environmental buffers.

💡 Night-time Lights

Final Score: 68.4/100 ↑ Higher is Better

ℹ️ What is Night-time Lights?Nighttime lights are a proxy for economic activity and electrification intensity.

Avg Radiance

34.21

Higher better

Max Radiance

55.98

Context

NTL Score

68.4

0-100

Scoring Breakdown

Parameter	Value	Target / Rule	Status
Avg Radiance	34.21	Scaled to 50	Score = min(100, avg/50*100)
NTL Score	68.4	0-100	Computed

Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison

Parameter	1000m	3000m	Average (Final)
Avg Radiance	38.14	30.28	34.21
Max Radiance	64.07	47.89	55.98
NTL Score	76.3	60.6	68.4

💡 What does this mean for you?Higher radiance often indicates stronger urban activity but can correlate with light pollution.

🏞️ Water Bodies

Final Score: 100.0/100 ↑ Higher is Better

ℹ️ What is Water Bodies?Water-bodies score reflects permanent and seasonal water presence in the analysis radius.

Permanent Water

60.37%

Higher generally better

Seasonal Water

95.59%

Context

Water Score

100.0

0-100

Scoring Breakdown

Parameter	Value	Target / Rule	Status
Permanent Water %	60.37%	70% weight	Scaled against 10%
Seasonal Water %	95.59%	30% weight	Scaled against 20%
Water Score	100.0	0-100	Computed

Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison

Parameter	1000m	3000m	Average (Final)
Permanent Water %	51.20%	69.53%	60.37%
Seasonal Water %	93.78%	97.40%	95.59%
Water Score	100.0	100.0	100.0

💡 What does this mean for you?Water presence can support cooling, recharge and ecological quality.

👥 Population Density

Final Score: 59.1/100 ↑ Higher is Better

ℹ️ What is Population Density?Population density indicates urban crowding pressure around the area.

Population

126,811

Estimated residents

Density/km²

8,173.0

Lower better for this score

Score

59.1

0-100

Scoring Breakdown

Parameter	Value	Target / Rule	Status
Density/km²	8,173.0	Inverse scale up to 20,000	Lower -> higher score
Score	59.1	0-100	Computed

Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison

Parameter	1000m	3000m	Average (Final)
Population Total	26,069	227,552	126,811
Density / km²	8,298.0	8,048.0	8,173.0
Pop Density Score	58.5	59.8	59.1

💡 What does this mean for you?Extremely high density can increase pressure on services and mobility.

⛲ Groundwater

Final Score: 63.4/100 ↑ Higher is Better

ℹ️ What is Groundwater?Groundwater score combines moisture, recharge, drought and trend indicators.

Soil Moisture

133.092

Higher better

Recharge

0.87

Higher better

PDSI

3.01

Higher better

Scoring Breakdown

Parameter	Value	Target / Rule	Status
Soil Moisture	133.092	30% weight	Scaled
Recharge	0.87	25% weight	Scaled
PDSI	3.01	20% weight	Scaled
SM Trend	0.0000	15% weight	Scaled
Precipitation	1,874.35	10% weight	Scaled

Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison

Parameter	1000m	3000m	Average (Final)
Soil Moisture	133.467	132.717	133.092
Recharge Estimate	0.66	1.08	0.87
PDSI	3.02	3.01	3.01
Groundwater Score	63.4	63.3	63.4

💡 What does this mean for you?Higher score suggests better long-term aquifer and moisture support conditions.

🌧️ Waterlogging

↑ Higher is Better

ℹ️ What is Waterlogging?Waterlogging combines topography, imperviousness and wetness indices across nearby grid cells.

Grid Count

Sampled cells

Avg Susceptibility

52.8

Lower is safer

High Risk Grids

High / Very High

Scoring Breakdown

Parameter	Value	Target	Status
Avg Susceptibility	52.8	< 40	Concern
Avg Slope	2.86°	> 1°	Good
Avg Impervious	89.8%	< 70%	Concern

💡 What does this mean for you?Higher susceptibility and low slope increase monsoon water stagnation probability.

🚶 Walkability & Safety

↑ Higher is Better

ℹ️ What is Walkability & Safety?OSM amenity metrics reflect pedestrian, safety and urban accessibility infrastructure.

Footpaths

Higher better

Street Lamps

Higher better

Police/Fire Access

Presence

Scoring Breakdown

Parameter	Value	Target / Rule	Status
Footpaths (500m)	0	≥ 3	Concern
Sidewalk Roads (1km)	0	≥ 5	Concern
Nearest Police Station	1,516 m	≤ 2000m	Context

💡 What does this mean for you?Higher OSM accessibility/safety features generally improve everyday livability.

⚠️ Risk Factors

↑ Higher is Better

ℹ️ What is Risk Factors?Nearby hazards and sensitive risk points mapped around this area.

Total Risks

Mapped points

Scoring Breakdown

Category	Risk	Distance / Severity	Meaning
Infrastructure	Irregular Municipal Water	0 m / High	Municipal supply once daily for 1-2 hours only
Environmental	Nallah Through Ramsagar Colony	100 m / High	Open drain running through middle of residential colony
Water_drainage	Low-Lying Colony Waterlogging	150 m / High	Colony built in natural depression, repeated monsoon flooding
Health_nuisance	Pond Remnant Mosquito Breeding	300 m / Medium	Old pond converted to dumping ground with stagnant water pockets

💡 What does this mean for you?Closer and severe risks can affect insurance, resale and safety comfort.

🌬️ Air Quality: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.

Component	Value	Weight/Rule	Contribution
Source	area_scores (latest by score_date)	Pipeline	Weighted model in backend

Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.

Final: See card score

💧 Water Quality: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.

Component	Value	Weight/Rule	Contribution
Source	area_scores (latest by score_date)	Pipeline	Weighted model in backend

Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.

Final: See card score

🧹 Sanitation: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.

Component	Value	Weight/Rule	Contribution
Source	area_scores (latest by score_date)	Pipeline	Weighted model in backend

Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.

Final: See card score

🛣️ Infrastructure: Infrastructure Score Formula

Formula: Composite weighted model from GHSL/ESA/VIIRS/Terrain features

Component	Value	Weight/Rule	Contribution
Urbanization index	100.00	20%	SMOD
Built-up balance	82.1%	15%	Best in moderate band
NTL stability	66.0%	15%	Power/activity consistency
Avg building height	9.84 m	10%	Vertical infra proxy
Impervious %	57.7%	10%	Moderate is optimal
Radiance	34.05	10%	Development proxy
Slope	0.10°	10%	Flatter is better
Green support	10.1%	10%	Tree + grass contribution

This is the same weighted structure used in Livability Infrastructure model.

Final: 77.75 / 100

🏥 Amenities: Amenity Score Breakdown

Formula: Each amenity category is capped at 100, final score is averaged across categories

Component	Value	Weight/Rule	Contribution
Hospitals 500m	0 * 33	Cap 100	Health access
Schools 1km	4 * 20	Cap 100	Education access
Markets 1km	3 * 33	Cap 100	Daily needs
Parks 500m	2 * 33	Cap 100	Open space
Transit 1km	3 * 50	Cap 100	Mobility

Category multipliers mirror the Livability snapshot logic.

Final: Final from amenity_scores table

🌳 Green Cover: Green Score Formula

Formula: Score = (NDVI*40%) + (Vegetation*30%) + (Dense Green*20%) + (Parks*10%)

Component	Value	Weight/Rule	Contribution
NDVI component	0.262 => 52.4	40%	21.0
Vegetation component	24.2% => 24.2	30%	7.3
Dense green component	11.0% => 22.0	20%	4.4
Parks component	2 => 66.0	10%	6.6

This matches the Livability GreenCover model weighting logic.

Final: 39.21 / 100

🔊 Noise: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.

Component	Value	Weight/Rule	Contribution
Source	area_scores (latest by score_date)	Pipeline	Weighted model in backend

Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.

Final: See card score

🌊 Flood Risk: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.

Component	Value	Weight/Rule	Contribution
Source	area_scores (latest by score_date)	Pipeline	Weighted model in backend

Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.

Final: See card score

🏚️ Earthquake Risk: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.

Component	Value	Weight/Rule	Contribution
Source	area_scores (latest by score_date)	Pipeline	Weighted model in backend

Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.

Final: See card score

🌡️ Land Surface Temp: LST Score Formula

Formula: Score = ((45 - LST Mean) / 25) * 100, clipped to [0,100]

Component	Value	Weight/Rule	Contribution
LST Mean	31.72 °C	Reference	20°C best, 45°C worst

Lower land surface temperature means better livability.

Final: 53.12 / 100

🏗️ Built-up Density: Built-up Score Formula

Formula: Score = 100 - Built-up %

Component	Value	Weight/Rule	Contribution
Built-up %	82.1%	Inverse	Lower is better

Dense concrete surfaces reduce infiltration and increase heat islands.

Final: 17.88 / 100

💡 Night-time Lights: Night-time Lights Formula

Formula: Score = min(100, (Avg Radiance / 50) * 100)

Component	Value	Weight/Rule	Contribution
Avg Radiance	34.21	Scale 0-50	Higher indicates activity

Higher night radiance generally tracks electrification and economic intensity.

Final: 68.42 / 100

🏞️ Water Bodies: Water Bodies Score Formula

Formula: Score = (Permanent Water Score * 70%) + (Seasonal Water Score * 30%)

Component	Value	Weight/Rule	Contribution
Permanent water	60.37%	70%	Scaled against 10% benchmark
Seasonal water	95.59%	30%	Scaled against 20% benchmark

Permanent water has higher score weight than seasonal water.

Final: 100.00 / 100

👥 Population Density: Population Density Formula

Formula: Score = ((20000 - density_per_km²) / 20000) * 100, clipped to [0,100]

Component	Value	Weight/Rule	Contribution
Density	8,173.0 /km²	Inverse scale	Lower density -> higher score

This follows the Livability PopulationDensity model.

Final: 59.14 / 100

⛲ Groundwater: Groundwater Score Formula

Formula: Weighted: Soil Moisture 30% + Recharge 25% + PDSI 20% + Trend 15% + Precipitation 10%

Component	Value	Weight/Rule	Contribution
Soil moisture	133.092	30%	Scaled to 0-200
Recharge estimate	0.87	25%	Scaled -200 to +400
PDSI	3.01	20%	Scaled -4 to +4
SM trend	0.0000	15%	Scaled -50 to +50
Precipitation	1,874.35	10%	Scaled 800 to 1800

Exactly reused from Livability Groundwater model logic.

Final: 63.37 / 100

🌧️ Waterlogging: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.

Component	Value	Weight/Rule	Contribution
Source	area_scores (latest by score_date)	Pipeline	Weighted model in backend

Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.

Final: See card score

🚶 Walkability & Safety: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.

Component	Value	Weight/Rule	Contribution
Source	area_scores (latest by score_date)	Pipeline	Weighted model in backend

Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.

Final: See card score

⚠️ Risk Factors: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.

Component	Value	Weight/Rule	Contribution
Source	area_scores (latest by score_date)	Pipeline	Weighted model in backend

Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.

Final: See card score

View full livability report for Ramsagar Para →

Compliance Status

RERA registration, filings, and compliance flags based on public CG-RERA records.

Compliance Status Based on public CG-RERA records

2 Passed

1 Issue(s)

3 N/A

Registration Status Unknown

Status not available on CG-RERA portal

Section 3 · Source · View Certificate

No RERA Orders

No complaints or orders found against this project

Sec 38–63 · Source

No Orders in Last 12 Months

Clean record — no complaints or orders filed

Source

Completion Overdue

Was due 30 Dec 2025 — overdue by ~4 month(s)

Section 4 · Source

Quarterly Updates Not Available

No compliance snapshot data on record

Section 11 · Source

Annual Audit Not Available

No compliance snapshot data on record

Section 4(2)(l)(D) · Source

Each check is based on publicly available CG-RERA portal data as of Apr 2026. How this works →

Details

Registration, professional team, bank, promoters, and compliance history.

Registration Details

RERA Number: P3CGRERA040818000005
Status
Project Type: Group Housing
Approved Date: 04 Aug 2018
Original End Date: 31 Mar 2025

Proposed Completion: 30 Dec 2025

View on Map

Promoters

No promoters linked.

Legal Orders & Cases

RERA legal orders, complaints, and case statistics filed against this project.

Legal Orders (0)

Complaint	Applicant	Section	Date	Source	PDF
No orders found for this project.

Location

Project address, coordinates, and nearby places.

Location Details

Address: Raipur, Chhattisgarh, India
District: RAIPUR
Tehsil: RAIPUR
Coordinates: 21.2513844, 81.6296413 View on Map

Neighborhood Intelligence

Explore nearby infrastructure around this project. Toggle categories to show/hide on the map.

Neighborhood Map 3 km radius

RERA Projects Near UNI HOMES EXTENSION -1 21 found within 3 km

#	Project	District	Status	Distance
1	AKANKSHA PARISAR	Raipur	Ongoing	0.32 km
2	PITHALIA PLAZA	Raipur	Ongoing	0.69 km
3	RAJARIA INDUSTRIAL EUIPMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED	Raipur	Ongoing	0.75 km
4	METROPOLIS	Raipur	Ongoing	0.86 km
5	RAHEJA TOWER	Raipur	Ongoing	0.98 km
6	ANAND ARCADE	Raipur	Ongoing	1.00 km
7	PMAY OF 58 DUS AT NEAR DKS PARISAR ,RAIPUR	Raipur	Ongoing	1.34 km
8	GULMOHAR PARK	Raipur	Ongoing	1.39 km
9	LALGANGA MIDAS	Raipur	Ongoing	1.59 km
10	pmay of 280(dus) at kata chirhuldih ,raipur	Raipur	Ongoing	1.63 km
11	CREST GREENS	Raipur	Ongoing	1.83 km
12	PMAY OF 576 DUS VILLAGE -KOTA CHIRHULDIH , - RAIPUR	Raipur	Ongoing	2.29 km
13	SIMRAN HEIGHTS	Raipur	Ongoing	2.40 km
14	KALPTARU CASITA	Raipur	New	2.42 km
15	SAMRAJYA RESIDENCY	Raipur	New	2.44 km
16	BRIGHT ENCLAVE	Raipur	Ongoing	2.51 km
17	mansarovar residency	Raipur	Ongoing	2.54 km
18	C.G. ELITE	Raipur	Ongoing	2.76 km
19	KAVISH ENCLAVE	Raipur	New	2.82 km
20	merlin jayshree vihar (phase-ii)	Raipur	Ongoing	2.85 km
21	RALAS ENCLAVE	Raipur	Ongoing	2.97 km

Buyer Checklist

Documents and verifications a buyer should review before purchase.

Buyer Document Verification Checklist

Key documents a buyer should verify before purchasing in this project. Items marked Available have data on Seemankan.

1/14 verified

RERA Registration Certificate Available

Confirms the project is registered with RERA CG. Verify registration number, validity dates, and project details on the RERA portal.

RERA No: P3CGRERA040818000005

View Certificate
Promoter Registration Certificate Verify Independently

Builder / colonizer company registration certificate. Confirms the promoter entity is a registered firm, company, or society.
Approved Building / Sanction Plan Verify Independently

Building plan sanctioned by the local authority. Verify floor count, setbacks, and FSI compliance.
Layout Plan Verify Independently

Approved layout showing plot divisions, roads, open spaces, and common areas.
Title Deed / Ownership Proof Verify Independently

Proof that the promoter legally owns the land. Verify via Sub-Registrar records.
Encumbrance Certificate Verify Independently

Confirms the property is free from legal dues, mortgages, or liens. Obtain from Sub-Registrar office.
Land Use / Diversion Certificate Verify Independently

Required if land was converted from agricultural to non-agricultural use.
Architect Certificate Verify Independently

Certification from a registered architect confirming structural plans and compliance.
Structural Engineer Certificate Verify Independently

Certification from a structural engineer confirming building safety and load-bearing capacity.
CA Financial Certificate Verify Independently

Chartered Accountant certificate on financial status, project cost estimates, and fund utilization.
Commencement Certificate Verify Independently

Permission to begin construction issued by the local authority after plan approval.
NOCs (No Objection Certificates) Verify Independently

NOCs from fire department, environment, water supply, electricity board, and other authorities.
Project Brochure / Specification Verify Independently

Official brochure with unit types, amenities, and specifications. Compare with actual delivery.
RERA Compliance Orders Verify Independently

Check if any orders, penalties, or directions have been issued against this project by RERA.

Risk Zone Within 5 km

Buffer zones (water bodies, airport restrictions) and risk sites (landfills, waste processing) detected within 3 km (immediate) and 5 km (extended) of the project.

Risk zones (within 5 km)

3 km: 12 3–5 km: 18

Water bodies (river/nala/lake)

3 km: 12 3–5 km: 14

Landfill / waste sites

3 km: 0 3–5 km: 4

Airport buffer overlap

3 km: 0 3–5 km: 0

Risk Zone Map (3 km & 5 km rings) Project marker centered

Water Bodies (26)

Devpuri Nala ≤3 km

Nala · 20m buffer

0.61 km
Kankali Talab ≤3 km

Tank · 50m buffer

0.63 km
Maharajband Talab ≤3 km

Tank · 50m buffer

0.85 km
Amanaka Talab ≤3 km

Tank · 50m buffer

1.5 km
Bhatagaon Nala ≤3 km

Nala · 20m buffer

1.79 km
Budha Talab (Vivekananda Sarovar) ≤3 km

Lake · 50m buffer

2.18 km
Kharun River ≤3 km

River · 75m buffer

2.63 km
Boriyakhurd Talab ≤3 km

Tank · 50m buffer

2.65 km

Landfill / Waste Sites (4)

Gudhiyari Old Dump Site 3–5 km

Legacy dump · 500m buffer

4.22 km
SLRM Centre Tendua (Tundra) 3–5 km

Waste processing · 200m buffer

4.24 km
Tatibandh Legacy Dump 3–5 km

Legacy dump · 500m buffer

4.53 km
Sarora SLRM Centre (Manikanchan Kendra) 3–5 km

Waste processing · 200m buffer

4.87 km

Reviews

Verified buyer reviews and ratings for this project.

No reviews yet. Be the first to review this project!

Login to Write a Review

You need to be signed in to submit a review for this project.