Home / RERA Projects / KAUSHALYA MATA VIHAR
ONGOING Residential Development RERA Page Project Website
GENERATE REPORT

KAUSHALYA MATA VIHAR

Compliance Status
Partial Compliance
21.1992, 81.6661 Explore area
District
Raipur
Area
—
Promoter
RAIPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
Project Information
Promoter RAIPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
Type Residential Development
Status Ongoing
Completion 09 Apr 2025
RERA No. PCGRERA190618000236
Registered 19 Jun 2018
Original End 31 Mar 2019
Total Units 1
EWS Category NO
Construction Cost ₹ 14432600000
Land Cost ₹ 744000000
Authorised Person CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
Website www.rdaraipur.com
Address VILLAGE-TIKRAPARA, BORIYAKHURD, DUNDA, DEVPURI, DUMARTARAI, RAIPUR (C.G.)
At a Glance
1
Total Units
-
Units Sold
1
Unsold
41
Legal Cases
Apr 2025
Target Completion
92%
Completion
Amenities & Facilities (10)
ENERGY MAANAGEMENT
100%
FIRE PROTECTION AND FIRE SAFETY REQUIREMENTS
55%
INTERNAL ROADS AND FOOTPATHS
98%
LANDSCAPING AND TREE PLANTING
85%
OPEN PARKING
95%
SEWERAGE
95%
STORM WATER DRAINS
95%
STREET LIGHTING
100%
TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL OF SEWERAGE AND SULLAGE WAT
80%
WATER SUPPLY
95%
Project Professionals
GULAB KEDIA
STATUTORY CA
AAYUSH GARG
QUARTERLY CA
RAIPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
ENGINEER
BUILDKRAFT ENGINEERING & ARCHITECTURE
ARCHITECT
Project Analysis

360° Project Intelligence

Comprehensive analysis across regulatory, livability, market, filing activity, and market readiness dimensions.

Regulatory
64
9 of 14 checks · Moderate Signals
Livability
56
Dhamtari Road · Moderate Signals
Legal
41
41 legal order(s) · 30 nearby
Filing Activity
617
560 docs · 57 quarterly updates
Market Readiness
0
Ongoing · due Apr 2025
Area Livability

Livability of Dhamtari Road

Eighteen environmental, infrastructure and amenity parameters for the nearest mapped area (Dhamtari Road — 1.11 km from this project). Click any parameter for the underlying readings, thresholds and what they mean.



🏠 Livability Parameters

Latest readings for Dhamtari Road. Only parameters with available data are shown below. Based on the latest readings for Dhamtari Road.

C
Composite Score
56.2 /100
Average

🌬️ Air Quality

Final Score: 91.2/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Air Quality?AQI summarizes PM2.5, PM10 and gases. Lower pollution values improve public health outcomes.
AQI
72
Satisfactory
PM2.5
28.4 µg/m³
≤ 40
PM10
189.9 µg/m³
≤ 60
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
PM2.5 28.4 µg/m³ ≤ 40
Good
PM10 189.9 µg/m³ ≤ 60
Concern
NO₂ 20.6 µg/m³ ≤ 40
Good
💡 What does this mean for you?Cleaner air lowers respiratory burden and improves outdoor comfort.

💧 Water Quality

Final Score: 75.1/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Water Quality?Water quality combines chemistry, supply duration and contamination markers.
TDS
321 ppm
≤ 500
pH
7.58
6.5–8.5
Supply
6.1 hr/day
≥ 8 hr
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
TDS 321 ppm ≤ 500
Good
Fluoride 0.63 mg/L ≤ 1.0
Good
Turbidity 4.9 NTU ≤ 1
Concern
💡 What does this mean for you?Better supply quality and consistency reduces dependence on tanker/groundwater fallback.

🧹 Sanitation

Final Score: 55.5/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Sanitation?Sanitation reflects ODF status, sewage treatment and waste management regularity.
ODF
ODF+
ODF++
Sewage Coverage
42%
≥ 80%
Drainage
52%
≥ 90%
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
ODF Status ODF+ ODF++
Info
Sewage Coverage 42% ≥ 80%
Concern
Drainage Coverage 52% ≥ 90%
Concern
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher sanitation maturity lowers disease exposure and neighborhood nuisance.

🛣️ Infrastructure

Final Score: 62.8/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Infrastructure?Infrastructure score combines land use, urbanization, built form, night lights and terrain indicators.
Built-up
36.6%
Balanced band
Tree Cover
4.7%
≥ 15%
Urbanization
83.8
Higher better
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Built-up (LULC) 36.6% 40-70%
Contextual
Impervious Surface 26.5% < 70%
Good
NDVI Mean 0.270 > 0.3
Concern
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Built-up (LULC) % 41.0% 32.3% 36.6%
Tree Cover % 3.8% 5.6% 4.7%
Urbanization Index 98.2 69.4 83.8
Infra Score 67.4 58.2 62.9
💡 What does this mean for you?Balanced built + green mix usually improves long-term livability resilience.

🏥 Amenities

Final Score: 76.4/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Amenities?Amenity score captures daily-access services in walk/short-drive radii.
Hospitals 500m
4
Target ≥1
Schools 1km
2
Target ≥3
Parks 500m
0
Target ≥1
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Hospitals (500m) 4 ≥1
Good
Schools (1km) 2 ≥3
Concern
Markets (1km) 4 ≥1
Good
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher local amenity density improves convenience and walkability.

🌳 Green Cover

Final Score: 35.4/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Green Cover?NDVI and vegetation structure are measured from satellite imagery to estimate neighborhood greenery.
NDVI Mean
0.220
Greenness index
Vegetation
29.8%
% green pixels
Dense Green
11.9%
Thick canopy
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
NDVI Mean 0.220 0.5 maps to score 100
Weighted 40%
Vegetation % 29.8% Direct % (cap 100)
Weighted 30%
Dense Green % 11.9% Scaled from 50%
Weighted 20%
Parks within 500m 0 Count * 33 (cap 100)
Weighted 10%
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
NDVI Mean 0.183 0.257 0.220
Vegetation % 26.1% 33.5% 29.8%
Dense Green % 11.9% 11.9% 11.9%
Tree Canopy % 10.6% 14.2% 12.4%
Green Score 27.2 35.4 31.3
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher green metrics typically reduce heat stress and improve comfort.

🔊 Noise

Final Score: 54.8/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Noise?Noise uses measured day/night dB compared to CPCB zone limits.
Day dB
54.3
vs CPCB day limit
Night dB
47.9
vs CPCB night limit
Zone
commercial
CPCB class
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Day Noise 54.3 dB ≤ 65.0 dB
Good
Night Noise 47.9 dB ≤ 55.0 dB
Good
Nearest Highway 238 m Higher usually quieter
Info
💡 What does this mean for you?Chronic high noise impacts stress, sleep quality and perceived comfort.

🌊 Flood Risk

Final Score: 40.0/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Flood Risk?Flood risk combines river exposure and local waterlogging vulnerability.
Overall Risk
Medium
Lower is safer
River Risk
Medium
Lower is safer
Waterlogging
Medium
Lower is safer
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Overall Risk Medium Low preferred
Info
River Flood Risk Medium Low preferred
Info
Waterlogging Risk Medium Low preferred
Info
💡 What does this mean for you?Lower flood risk means less disruption and lower hazard exposure.

🏚️ Earthquake Risk

Final Score: 10.0/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Earthquake Risk?Earthquake profile uses seismic zone, PGA and soil/liquefaction risk factors.
Seismic Zone
Zone II
Lower risk zone preferred
Risk Level
Low
Low preferred
Liquefaction
None
Low preferred
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Seismic Zone Zone II II preferred
Info
Risk Level Low Low preferred
Info
PGA (475yr) 0.0155g Lower preferred
Info
💡 What does this mean for you?Lower seismic hazard reduces structural and insurance risk exposure.

🌡️ Land Surface Temp

Final Score: 60.3/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Land Surface Temp?Land Surface Temperature reflects heat-island intensity from satellite thermal bands.
LST Mean
29.9°C
Lower better
LST Min
6.6°C
Context
LST Max
40.5°C
Lower better
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
LST Mean 29.9°C 20°C best / 45°C worst
Weighted by formula
LST Score 60.3 0-100
Computed
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
LST Mean (°C) 29.8 30.0 29.9
LST Min (°C) 4.6 8.5 6.6
LST Max (°C) 40.7 40.4 40.5
LST Score 60.6 60.0 60.3
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher heat exposure affects comfort, cooling load and health risk.

🏗️ Built-up Density

Final Score: 63.4/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Built-up Density?Built-up density measures extent of developed surface versus open space.
Built-up %
36.6%
Lower better
Open Space %
63.4%
Higher better
Built-up Score
63.4
0-100
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Built-up % 36.6% Inverse scoring
Score = 100 - builtup%
Open Space % 63.4% Context
Info
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Built-up % 41.0% 32.3% 36.6%
Open Space % 59.0% 67.7% 63.4%
Built-up Score 59.0 67.7 63.4
💡 What does this mean for you?Very high built-up often raises heat and runoff while reducing open environmental buffers.

💡 Night-time Lights

Final Score: 43.3/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Night-time Lights?Nighttime lights are a proxy for economic activity and electrification intensity.
Avg Radiance
21.64
Higher better
Max Radiance
32.01
Context
NTL Score
43.3
0-100
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Avg Radiance 21.64 Scaled to 50
Score = min(100, avg/50*100)
NTL Score 43.3 0-100
Computed
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Avg Radiance 23.69 19.59 21.64
Max Radiance 34.83 29.19 32.01
NTL Score 47.4 39.2 43.3
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher radiance often indicates stronger urban activity but can correlate with light pollution.

🏞️ Water Bodies

Final Score: 100.0/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Water Bodies?Water-bodies score reflects permanent and seasonal water presence in the analysis radius.
Permanent Water
71.48%
Higher generally better
Seasonal Water
97.45%
Context
Water Score
100.0
0-100
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Permanent Water % 71.48% 70% weight
Scaled against 10%
Seasonal Water % 97.45% 30% weight
Scaled against 20%
Water Score 100.0 0-100
Computed
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Permanent Water % 69.70% 73.25% 71.48%
Seasonal Water % 98.20% 96.69% 97.45%
Water Score 100.0 100.0 100.0
💡 What does this mean for you?Water presence can support cooling, recharge and ecological quality.

👥 Population Density

Final Score: 87.6/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Population Density?Population density indicates urban crowding pressure around the area.
Population
39,569
Estimated residents
Density/km²
2,485.4
Lower better for this score
Score
87.6
0-100
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Density/km² 2,485.4 Inverse scale up to 20,000
Lower -> higher score
Score 87.6 0-100
Computed
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Population Total 7,676 71,461 39,569
Density / km² 2,443.3 2,527.4 2,485.4
Pop Density Score 87.8 87.4 87.6
💡 What does this mean for you?Extremely high density can increase pressure on services and mobility.

⛲ Groundwater

Final Score: 63.5/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Groundwater?Groundwater score combines moisture, recharge, drought and trend indicators.
Soil Moisture
137.207
Higher better
Recharge
-0.19
Higher better
PDSI
2.82
Higher better
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Soil Moisture 137.207 30% weight
Scaled
Recharge -0.19 25% weight
Scaled
PDSI 2.82 20% weight
Scaled
SM Trend 0.0000 15% weight
Scaled
Precipitation 1,860.53 10% weight
Scaled
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Soil Moisture 137.606 136.809 137.207
Recharge Estimate -0.25 -0.13 -0.19
PDSI 2.81 2.82 2.82
Groundwater Score 63.5 63.4 63.5
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher score suggests better long-term aquifer and moisture support conditions.

🌧️ Waterlogging

↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Waterlogging?Waterlogging combines topography, imperviousness and wetness indices across nearby grid cells.
Grid Count
168
Sampled cells
Avg Susceptibility
46.4
Lower is safer
High Risk Grids
37
High / Very High
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTargetStatus
Avg Susceptibility 46.4 < 40
Concern
Avg Slope 2.62° > 1°
Good
Avg Impervious 17.0% < 70%
Good
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher susceptibility and low slope increase monsoon water stagnation probability.

🚶 Walkability & Safety

↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Walkability & Safety?OSM amenity metrics reflect pedestrian, safety and urban accessibility infrastructure.
Footpaths
0
Higher better
Street Lamps
0
Higher better
Police/Fire Access
0
Presence
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Footpaths (500m) 0 ≥ 3
Concern
Sidewalk Roads (1km) 0 ≥ 5
Concern
Nearest Police Station — m ≤ 2000m
Context
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher OSM accessibility/safety features generally improve everyday livability.

⚠️ Risk Factors

↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Risk Factors?Nearby hazards and sensitive risk points mapped around this area.
Total Risks
6
Mapped points
Scoring Breakdown
CategoryRiskDistance / SeverityMeaning
Future_threats NH-43 6-Laning Notification 45 m / Critical Properties within 45m from centerline notified for acquisition
Air_pollution NH-43 Heavy Vehicle Pollution 100 m / High National highway heavy traffic with continuous truck movement
Health_nuisance Highway Noise Pollution 100 m / High Continuous highway traffic noise exceeding 75dB throughout day
Land_zoning 220kV HT Line Along Highway 150 m / High Major high-tension line parallel to highway, EMF proximity concern
Environmental Highway Roadside Drainage 300 m / Medium Poor drainage along highway creating stagnant pools
Safety_social Vacant Industrial Plots 500 m / Medium Disused industrial plots attracting antisocial elements at night
💡 What does this mean for you?Closer and severe risks can affect insurance, resale and safety comfort.

🌬️ Air Quality: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

💧 Water Quality: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🧹 Sanitation: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🛣️ Infrastructure: Infrastructure Score Formula

Formula: Composite weighted model from GHSL/ESA/VIIRS/Terrain features
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Urbanization index83.8020%SMOD
Built-up balance36.6%15%Best in moderate band
NTL stability70.0%15%Power/activity consistency
Avg building height3.98 m10%Vertical infra proxy
Impervious %26.5%10%Moderate is optimal
Radiance20.5510%Development proxy
Slope0.10°10%Flatter is better
Green support4.7%10%Tree + grass contribution
This is the same weighted structure used in Livability Infrastructure model.
Final: 62.85 / 100

🏥 Amenities: Amenity Score Breakdown

Formula: Each amenity category is capped at 100, final score is averaged across categories
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Hospitals 500m4 * 33Cap 100Health access
Schools 1km2 * 20Cap 100Education access
Markets 1km4 * 33Cap 100Daily needs
Parks 500m0 * 33Cap 100Open space
Transit 1km0 * 50Cap 100Mobility
Category multipliers mirror the Livability snapshot logic.
Final: Final from amenity_scores table

🌳 Green Cover: Green Score Formula

Formula: Score = (NDVI*40%) + (Vegetation*30%) + (Dense Green*20%) + (Parks*10%)
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
NDVI component0.220 => 44.040%17.6
Vegetation component29.8% => 29.830%8.9
Dense green component11.9% => 23.820%4.8
Parks component0 => 0.010%0.0
This matches the Livability GreenCover model weighting logic.
Final: 31.30 / 100

🔊 Noise: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🌊 Flood Risk: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🏚️ Earthquake Risk: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🌡️ Land Surface Temp: LST Score Formula

Formula: Score = ((45 - LST Mean) / 25) * 100, clipped to [0,100]
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
LST Mean29.92 °CReference20°C best, 45°C worst
Lower land surface temperature means better livability.
Final: 60.32 / 100

🏗️ Built-up Density: Built-up Score Formula

Formula: Score = 100 - Built-up %
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Built-up %36.6%InverseLower is better
Dense concrete surfaces reduce infiltration and increase heat islands.
Final: 63.37 / 100

💡 Night-time Lights: Night-time Lights Formula

Formula: Score = min(100, (Avg Radiance / 50) * 100)
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Avg Radiance21.64Scale 0-50Higher indicates activity
Higher night radiance generally tracks electrification and economic intensity.
Final: 43.28 / 100

🏞️ Water Bodies: Water Bodies Score Formula

Formula: Score = (Permanent Water Score * 70%) + (Seasonal Water Score * 30%)
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Permanent water71.48%70%Scaled against 10% benchmark
Seasonal water97.45%30%Scaled against 20% benchmark
Permanent water has higher score weight than seasonal water.
Final: 100.00 / 100

👥 Population Density: Population Density Formula

Formula: Score = ((20000 - density_per_km²) / 20000) * 100, clipped to [0,100]
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Density2,485.4 /km²Inverse scaleLower density -> higher score
This follows the Livability PopulationDensity model.
Final: 87.57 / 100

⛲ Groundwater: Groundwater Score Formula

Formula: Weighted: Soil Moisture 30% + Recharge 25% + PDSI 20% + Trend 15% + Precipitation 10%
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Soil moisture137.20730%Scaled to 0-200
Recharge estimate-0.1925%Scaled -200 to +400
PDSI2.8220%Scaled -4 to +4
SM trend0.000015%Scaled -50 to +50
Precipitation1,860.5310%Scaled 800 to 1800
Exactly reused from Livability Groundwater model logic.
Final: 63.45 / 100

🌧️ Waterlogging: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🚶 Walkability & Safety: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

⚠️ Risk Factors: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

View full livability report for Dhamtari Road →

Compliance Status

RERA registration, filings, and compliance flags based on public CG-RERA records.

Compliance Status Based on public CG-RERA records
1 Passed
1 Warning
2 Issue(s)
2 N/A
RERA Registration Active
Reg No. PCGRERA190618000236 — Status: Ongoing
Section 3 · Source · RERA Official Page
2 Penalty Order(s)
Complaints: M-RECT-2025-02750, M-PRO-2022-01652
Sec 38–63 · Source · M-RECT-2025-02750 · M-PRO-2022-01652
9 Order(s) in Last 12 Months
Recent: M-PRO-2025-03241, M-PRO-2025-03133, M-PRO-2025-03022, M-PRO-2025-02871, M-PRO-2025-02809 …
Source · M-PRO-2025-03241 · M-PRO-2025-03133 · M-PRO-2025-03022 · M-PRO-2025-02871 · M-PRO-2025-02809 · M-PRO-2025-02944 · SM-REG-2025-02691 · SM-REG-2025-02693 · SM-REG-2025-02692
Completion Overdue
Was due 09 Apr 2025 — overdue by ~13 month(s)
Section 4 · Source
Quarterly Updates Not Available
No compliance snapshot data on record
Section 11 · Source
Annual Audit Not Available
No compliance snapshot data on record
Section 4(2)(l)(D) · Source
Each check is based on publicly available CG-RERA portal data as of Apr 2026. How this works →
Other Projects by Same Promoter (3)
ProjectRERA No.StatusDistrictType
288 LIG Flats Sector-13 Kaushalya mata vihar PCGRERA270624001792 Ongoing Raipur Residential Development
BORIYAKHURD SCHEME EWS ROW HOUSES & LIG APARTMENTS PCGRERA231119001076 Ongoing Raipur Residential Development
TDS-01 INDRAPRASTH PHASE -2 PCGRERA270618000347 Ongoing Raipur Mixed Development

Details

Registration, professional team, bank, promoters, and compliance history.

Registration Details
RERA Number
PCGRERA190618000236
Status
Ongoing
Project Type
Residential Development
Approved Date
19 Jun 2018
Original End Date
31 Mar 2019
EWS Category
NO
Construction Cost
₹ 14432600000
Land Cost
₹ 744000000
Proposed Completion
09 Apr 2025
Authorised Person
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
Website
www.rdaraipur.com
View on Map
Professional Team
RoleNameLicense / Membership
Statutory CA Gulab Kedia 400940
Quarterly CA aayush garg 309961
Engineer RAIPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY CA/2015/67284
Architect Buildkraft Engineering & Architecture 2015/67284
Promoters
R
RAIPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Government/Semi Government Agency
R
RAIPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
R
RAIPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORTY, BY-CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
R
RAIPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORTY, THRUOGH CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
R
REVENUE OFFICER ( TEHSILDAR RDA)
C
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
C
CEO RDA RAIPUR
R
RAIPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KAMAL BIHAR YOJANA
C
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, RAIPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
R
RAIPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY REPRESENTED BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
C
CEO, RAIPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
R
RAIPUR DEVLOPMENT AUTHORITY
R
RAIPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, THRU-CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
R
RAIPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY RAIPUR
C
CHIEF EXCUTIVE ENGINEER, RAIPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
R
RAIPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY THROUGH - CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
C
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, BY-RAIPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORTY,
A
ANIL KUMAR
C
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, BY-RAIPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,
C
CEO CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

Legal Orders & Cases

RERA legal orders, complaints, and case statistics filed against this project.

41
Total Cases
9
Last 12 Months
32
Older Cases
41
PDFs Available
Legal Orders (41)
ComplaintApplicantSectionDateSourcePDF
M-PRO-2025-03241 SHASHI RAUT Section 17,Section 18,Section 19 23 Mar 2026 This project
M-PRO-2025-03133 ANKITA SINGH Section 17,Section 18,Section 19 09 Jan 2026 This project
M-PRO-2025-03022 VIJAY RAJANI - 26 Dec 2025 This project
M-PRO-2025-02871 AMIT KUMAR GUPTA Section 17,Section 18 19 Sep 2025 This project
M-PRO-2025-02809 ARUNA MISHRA Section 17,Section 18,Section 19 23 Jul 2025 This project
M-PRO-2025-02944 SANJU SINGH - 14 Jul 2025 This project
SM-REG-2025-02691 CG-RERA - 05 May 2025 This project
SM-REG-2025-02693 CG-RERA - 05 May 2025 This project
SM-REG-2025-02692 CG-RERA - 05 May 2025 This project
M-RECT-2025-02750 SANJNA SABLANI Section 39 07 Apr 2025 This project
M-PRO-2024-02529 RITESH SONI Section 17,Section 18 16 Oct 2024 This project
M-PRO-2024-02426 ASHA AMRANI WIFE OF SHRI ASHOK AMRANI Section 17,Section 18,Section 19 31 Jul 2024 This project
M-PRO-2024-02430 SANGEETA PUNSHI WIFE OF SHRI NARENDRA PUNSHI Section 17,Section 18,Section 19 31 Jul 2024 This project
M-PRO-2024-02427 YOGESH AGRAWL Section 17,Section 18,Section 19 31 Jul 2024 This project
M-PRO-2024-02171 UMESH KUMAR CHANDRAKAR - 19 Apr 2024 This project
M-PRO-2024-02170 SMT ISHWARI SAHU W/O ARJUN SAHU Section 11,Section 17,Section 18 19 Apr 2024 This project
SM-EXP-2024-02264 CG-RERA - 12 Apr 2024 This project
M-PRO-2023-01928 SANJNA SABLANI Section 17,Section 18,Section 19 23 Aug 2023 This project
M-PRO-2023-01927 KIRAN SABLANI Section 17,Section 18,Section 19 23 Aug 2023 This project
M-PRO-2023-01904 JAYA THAKKAR Section 19 21 Jul 2023 This project
M-PRO-2023-01890 JULI MANIKPURI Section 17 14 Jun 2023 This project
M-PRO-2022-01809 UPENDRA KUMAR JAIN Section 18,Section 19 05 Jun 2023 This project
M-ALL-2022-01850 PURNIMA DEVI Section 18,Section 19 02 Jun 2023 This project
M-PRO-2022-01805 MR.MUKESH GOYAL - 29 May 2023 This project
M-PRO-2022-01656 SMT GULJEET KOUR - 26 Sep 2022 This project
M-PRO-2022-01719 SMT. DILSHAD KAUSHAR W/O AMINUDDIN Section 17,Section 18 27 Jul 2022 This project
M-PRO-2022-01663 SHRI HARSH TIWARI Section 14 25 Jul 2022 This project
M-PRO-2022-01666 SHRI SUBRAT CHOUDHARY Section 19 18 Jul 2022 This project
M-PRO-2022-01652 DEVYANI SHARMA Section 37,Section 38 16 Jun 2022 This project
M-PRO-2021-01615 KU. MONIKA SAHU Section 19 25 Apr 2022 This project
M-PRO-2022-01628 M/S BHUJADHARI PROPERTIES PVT. LTD Section 19 20 Apr 2022 This project
M-PRO-2021-01430 SHRI SHANKAR LAL KHANDELWAL - 11 Aug 2021 This project
M-PRO-2020-01168 (01) SHRI ADITYA PANDEY, S/O LATE SHRI ARUN PANDEY, (02) SMT SMITA PANDEY, W/O SHRI ADITYA PANDEY Section 18 04 Feb 2021 This project
M-PRO-2020-01129 SHRI ANUP KUMAR SAHU, S/O SHRI SEVAK RAM SAHU Section 11 02 Jan 2021 This project
M-PRO-2020-01078 SHRI BALRAM TIWARI, S/O SHRI RAJKUMAR TIWARI Section 31 17 Nov 2020 This project
M-PRO-2019-00843 (01) SHRI YOGESH VARSHNEY, (02) SMT DIPPTI VARSHNEY Section 31 11 Feb 2020 This project
M-PRO-2019-00798 SHRI AMIT KUMAR SINGH, S/O SHRI SHRIPRAKASH SINGH Section 12,Section 18 03 Feb 2020 This project
M-PRO-2019-00860 (01) SMT SHOBHA SHARMA, W/O SHRI AJAY KUMAR SHARMA, (02) SHRI AJAY KUMAR SHARMA, S/O LATE SHRI TARACHAND SHARMA Section 17 16 Jan 2020 This project
M-PRO-2019-00820 VINDHYAVASINI INFRA TECH, MANAGER BY-SHRI SANKET AGRAWAL, Section 31 13 Jan 2020 This project
M-PRO-2019-00276 SMT SEEMA SINGH, W/O SHRI SANJAY KUMAR BHASKAR Section 89 07 Jun 2019 This project
M-PRO-2018-00114 SHRI VIVEK SINGH THAKUR S/O SHRI SAROJ KUMAR THAKUR Section 31 23 Oct 2018 This project

Location

Project address, coordinates, and nearby places.

Location Details
Address
VILLAGE-TIKRAPARA, BORIYAKHURD, DUNDA, DEVPURI, DUMARTARAI, RAIPUR (C.G.)
District
Raipur
Tehsil
Raipur
Coordinates
21.1992361, 81.6660536 View on Map
Neighborhood Intelligence

Explore nearby infrastructure around this project. Toggle categories to show/hide on the map.

Neighborhood Map 3 km radius
RERA Projects Near Kaushalya Mata Vihar 30 found within 3 km
# Project District Status Distance
1 central avenue (d-block) Raipur New 0.26 km
2 central avenue (c-block) Raipur New 0.26 km
3 CENTRAL AVENUE (B-BLOCK) Raipur New 0.26 km
4 SKY VILLAS Raipur Ongoing 0.55 km
5 EMPRESSIA ELITE (E2) Raipur Ongoing 0.76 km
6 vedanta vihar phase-II Raipur New 1.20 km
7 VEDANTA VIHAR PHASE-1 Raipur New 1.20 km
8 GANESHA PARK Raipur New 1.23 km
9 solus pearl Raipur New 1.25 km
10 SIYA RESIDENCY PHASE -2 Raipur New 1.40 km
11 aakrity Raipur Ongoing 1.54 km
12 GODRIWALA CITY EXTENSION Raipur New 1.60 km
13 288 LIG Flats Sector-13 Kaushalya mata vihar Raipur Ongoing 1.63 km
14 godriwala city phase-02 Raipur New 1.63 km
15 godriwala city phase-02 (EXTENSION) Raipur New 1.63 km
16 GODRIWALA CITY Raipur Ongoing 1.64 km
17 jainam park Raipur New 1.65 km
18 WALLFORT ELEGANTE Raipur Ongoing 1.73 km
19 omaya square Raipur New 1.76 km
20 alaska tower Raipur Ongoing 1.82 km
21 GEEKAY BUSINESS CENTRE Raipur Ongoing 1.96 km
22 shreeje v3 balaji greens Raipur Ongoing 2.04 km
23 SHREEJE V3 BALAJI GREENS Raipur Ongoing 2.05 km
24 SHREEJI V-3 BALAJI GREENS Raipur Ongoing 2.05 km
25 ashoka palm meadows phase (i) Raipur Ongoing 2.10 km
26 CHAITANYA BUSINESS PARK Raipur New 2.12 km
27 pmay of 232 dus at amlidih raipur Raipur Ongoing 2.13 km
28 samta parisar Raipur Ongoing 2.13 km
29 SAMRAT VATIKA Raipur Ongoing 2.14 km
30 CLAY CASTLE Raipur Ongoing 2.14 km

Buyer Checklist

Documents and verifications a buyer should review before purchase.

Buyer Document Verification Checklist

Key documents a buyer should verify before purchasing in this project. Items marked Available have data on Seemankan.

10/14 verified
  • RERA Registration Certificate Available
    Confirms the project is registered with RERA CG. Verify registration number, validity dates, and project details on the RERA portal.
    RERA No: PCGRERA190618000236
    View on RERA Portal
  • Promoter Registration Certificate Available
    Builder / colonizer company registration certificate. Confirms the promoter entity is a registered firm, company, or society.
    Preview
  • Approved Building / Sanction Plan Verify Independently
    Building plan sanctioned by the local authority. Verify floor count, setbacks, and FSI compliance.
  • Layout Plan Available
    Approved layout showing plot divisions, roads, open spaces, and common areas.
    Preview
  • Title Deed / Ownership Proof Available
    Proof that the promoter legally owns the land. Verify via Sub-Registrar records.
    Preview
  • Encumbrance Certificate Available
    Confirms the property is free from legal dues, mortgages, or liens. Obtain from Sub-Registrar office.
    Preview
  • Land Use / Diversion Certificate Verify Independently
    Required if land was converted from agricultural to non-agricultural use.
  • Architect Certificate Available
    Certification from a registered architect confirming structural plans and compliance.
    View View View +17 more
  • Structural Engineer Certificate Available
    Certification from a structural engineer confirming building safety and load-bearing capacity.
    View View View +17 more
  • CA Financial Certificate Available
    Chartered Accountant certificate on financial status, project cost estimates, and fund utilization.
    Preview View View +18 more
  • Commencement Certificate Verify Independently
    Permission to begin construction issued by the local authority after plan approval.
  • NOCs (No Objection Certificates) Verify Independently
    NOCs from fire department, environment, water supply, electricity board, and other authorities.
  • Project Brochure / Specification Available
    Official brochure with unit types, amenities, and specifications. Compare with actual delivery.
    View View View +18 more
  • RERA Compliance Orders Available
    Check if any orders, penalties, or directions have been issued against this project by RERA.
    41 order(s) on record — review in Legal tab
Disclaimer: This checklist is for informational purposes only. "Available" means Seemankan has a copy from the RERA portal — it does not constitute legal verification. Always verify original documents with the concerned authorities and consult a legal advisor before making a purchase decision.

Risk Zone Within 5 km

Buffer zones (water bodies, airport restrictions) and risk sites (landfills, waste processing) detected within 3 km (immediate) and 5 km (extended) of the project.

13
Risk zones (within 5 km)
3 km: 4 3–5 km: 8
12
Water bodies (river/nala/lake)
3 km: 4 3–5 km: 8
0
Landfill / waste sites
3 km: 0 3–5 km: 0
1
Airport buffer overlap
3 km: 0 3–5 km: 0
Risk Zone Map (3 km & 5 km rings) Project marker centered
Water Bodies (12)
  • Mandir Hasaud Talab ≤3 km
    Tank · 50m buffer
    2.05 km
  • Rajatalab ≤3 km
    Tank · 50m buffer
    2.26 km
  • Khamhardih Nala ≤3 km
    Drain · 20m buffer
    2.35 km
  • Dunda Talab ≤3 km
    Pond · 50m buffer
    2.85 km
  • Birgaon Talab 3–5 km
    Tank · 50m buffer
    3.01 km
  • Mahanadi Main Canal 3–5 km
    Canal · 100m buffer
    3.39 km
  • Pandri Nala 3–5 km
    Nala · 20m buffer
    3.88 km
  • Pandri Talab 3–5 km
    Tank · 50m buffer
    3.93 km
Airport (1)
  • Swami Vivekananda Airport 5–10 km
    RPR / VARP · DGCA height limits apply
    7.83 km

Reviews

Verified buyer reviews and ratings for this project.

No reviews yet. Be the first to review this project!

Login to Write a Review

You need to be signed in to submit a review for this project.

Login or Register