You're viewing a preview. Log in or create a free account to see the full page.
RealEstateIQTM
IN हिन्दी
Login Sign Up Free
Want a full project intelligence report? Download a detailed PDF report — RERA compliance, promoter, financials, amenities, location & risk.
Generate Project Report
Home / RERA Projects / SUMEET TRADE CENTER (COMMERCIAL) SUMEET RESIDENCY(RESIDENTIAL)
NEW Mixed Development RERA Page Project Website
GENERATE REPORT

SUMEET TRADE CENTER (COMMERCIAL) SUMEET RESIDENCY(RESIDENTIAL)

Compliance Status
Compliant
21.2206, 81.6455 Explore area
District
Raipur
Area
—
Promoter
SUMEET SYNFAB INDIA PVT. LTD.
Project Information
Promoter SUMEET SYNFAB INDIA PVT. LTD.
Type Mixed Development
Status New
Completion 31 Mar 2027
RERA No. PCGRERA311220001176
Registered 31 Dec 2020
Original End 31 Dec 2025
Total Units 189 · 36 sold
EWS Category NO
Construction Cost ₹ 721133000
Land Cost ₹ 436737000
Authorised Person vijay kumar
Website www.sumeetinfracon.com
Address TIKRAPARA ,TAHSIL-RAIPUR,DIST - RAIPUR
At a Glance
189
Total Units
36
Units Sold
150
Unsold
0
Legal Cases
Mar 2027
Target Completion
75%
Completion
Amenities & Facilities (12)
BOUNDARY WALL
0%
ENERGY MAANAGEMENT
0%
FIRE PROTECTION AND FIRE SAFETY REQUIREMENTS
0%
INTERNAL ROADS AND FOOTPATHS
90%
LANDSCAPING AND TREE PLANTING
0%
OPEN PARKING
90%
SEWERAGE
0%
STORM WATER DRAINS
0%
STREET LIGHTING
0%
TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL OF SEWERAGE AND SULLAGE WAT
0%
WATER CONSERVATION RAIN WATER HARVESTING
0%
WATER SUPPLY
0%
Project Professionals
ANSHUL BEGANI
STATUTORY CA
AMIT CHANDRA SHARMA
QUARTERLY CA
ROHAN KUMAR GUPTA
ENGINEER
KARAN JAIN
ARCHITECT
Project Analysis

360° Project Intelligence

Comprehensive analysis across regulatory, livability, market, filing activity, and market readiness dimensions.

Regulatory
43
6 of 14 checks · Weak Signals
Livability
73
Tikrapara · Moderate Signals
Legal
0
No legal orders on record · 30 nearby
Filing Activity
353
287 docs · 66 quarterly updates
Market Readiness
25
New · due Mar 2027
Area Livability

Livability of Tikrapara

Eighteen environmental, infrastructure and amenity parameters for the nearest mapped area (Tikrapara — 0.54 km from this project). Click any parameter for the underlying readings, thresholds and what they mean.



🏠 Livability Parameters

Latest readings for Tikrapara. Only parameters with available data are shown below. Based on the latest readings for Tikrapara.

B
Composite Score
73.3 /100
Good

🌬️ Air Quality

Final Score: 100.0/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Air Quality?AQI summarizes PM2.5, PM10 and gases. Lower pollution values improve public health outcomes.
AQI
45
Good
PM2.5
16.2 µg/m³
≤ 40
PM10
40.4 µg/m³
≤ 60
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
PM2.5 16.2 µg/m³ ≤ 40
Good
PM10 40.4 µg/m³ ≤ 60
Good
NO₂ 14.2 µg/m³ ≤ 40
Good
💡 What does this mean for you?Cleaner air lowers respiratory burden and improves outdoor comfort.

💧 Water Quality

Final Score: 74.2/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Water Quality?Water quality combines chemistry, supply duration and contamination markers.
TDS
346 ppm
≤ 500
pH
7.80
6.5–8.5
Supply
5.2 hr/day
≥ 8 hr
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
TDS 346 ppm ≤ 500
Good
Fluoride 0.52 mg/L ≤ 1.0
Good
Turbidity 4.3 NTU ≤ 1
Concern
💡 What does this mean for you?Better supply quality and consistency reduces dependence on tanker/groundwater fallback.

🧹 Sanitation

Final Score: 56.6/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Sanitation?Sanitation reflects ODF status, sewage treatment and waste management regularity.
ODF
ODF+
ODF++
Sewage Coverage
42%
≥ 80%
Drainage
52%
≥ 90%
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
ODF Status ODF+ ODF++
Info
Sewage Coverage 42% ≥ 80%
Concern
Drainage Coverage 52% ≥ 90%
Concern
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher sanitation maturity lowers disease exposure and neighborhood nuisance.

🛣️ Infrastructure

Final Score: 80.1/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Infrastructure?Infrastructure score combines land use, urbanization, built form, night lights and terrain indicators.
Built-up
71.0%
Balanced band
Tree Cover
10.8%
≥ 15%
Urbanization
99.3
Higher better
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Built-up (LULC) 71.0% 40-70%
Contextual
Impervious Surface 46.0% < 70%
Good
NDVI Mean 0.240 > 0.3
Concern
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Built-up (LULC) % 74.1% 67.9% 71.0%
Tree Cover % 14.0% 7.6% 10.8%
Urbanization Index 100.0 98.5 99.3
Infra Score 80.8 79.3 80.1
💡 What does this mean for you?Balanced built + green mix usually improves long-term livability resilience.

🏥 Amenities

Final Score: 87.2/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Amenities?Amenity score captures daily-access services in walk/short-drive radii.
Hospitals 500m
0
Target ≥1
Schools 1km
3
Target ≥3
Parks 500m
3
Target ≥1
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Hospitals (500m) 0 ≥1
Concern
Schools (1km) 3 ≥3
Good
Markets (1km) 5 ≥1
Good
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher local amenity density improves convenience and walkability.

🌳 Green Cover

Final Score: 46.1/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Green Cover?NDVI and vegetation structure are measured from satellite imagery to estimate neighborhood greenery.
NDVI Mean
0.233
Greenness index
Vegetation
31.0%
% green pixels
Dense Green
12.2%
Thick canopy
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
NDVI Mean 0.233 0.5 maps to score 100
Weighted 40%
Vegetation % 31.0% Direct % (cap 100)
Weighted 30%
Dense Green % 12.2% Scaled from 50%
Weighted 20%
Parks within 500m 3 Count * 33 (cap 100)
Weighted 10%
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
NDVI Mean 0.218 0.247 0.233
Vegetation % 22.4% 39.7% 31.0%
Dense Green % 13.1% 11.4% 12.2%
Tree Canopy % 19.3% 18.4% 18.9%
Green Score 39.3 46.1 42.7
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher green metrics typically reduce heat stress and improve comfort.

🔊 Noise

Final Score: 65.8/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Noise?Noise uses measured day/night dB compared to CPCB zone limits.
Day dB
52.3
vs CPCB day limit
Night dB
47.2
vs CPCB night limit
Zone
commercial
CPCB class
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Day Noise 52.3 dB ≤ 65.0 dB
Good
Night Noise 47.2 dB ≤ 55.0 dB
Good
Nearest Highway 833 m Higher usually quieter
Info
💡 What does this mean for you?Chronic high noise impacts stress, sleep quality and perceived comfort.

🌊 Flood Risk

Final Score: 60.0/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Flood Risk?Flood risk combines river exposure and local waterlogging vulnerability.
Overall Risk
Medium
Lower is safer
River Risk
Medium
Lower is safer
Waterlogging
Medium
Lower is safer
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Overall Risk Medium Low preferred
Info
River Flood Risk Medium Low preferred
Info
Waterlogging Risk Medium Low preferred
Info
💡 What does this mean for you?Lower flood risk means less disruption and lower hazard exposure.

🏚️ Earthquake Risk

Final Score: 90.0/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Earthquake Risk?Earthquake profile uses seismic zone, PGA and soil/liquefaction risk factors.
Seismic Zone
Zone II
Lower risk zone preferred
Risk Level
Low
Low preferred
Liquefaction
None
Low preferred
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Seismic Zone Zone II II preferred
Info
Risk Level Low Low preferred
Info
PGA (475yr) 0.0155g Lower preferred
Info
💡 What does this mean for you?Lower seismic hazard reduces structural and insurance risk exposure.

🌡️ Land Surface Temp

Final Score: 57.1/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Land Surface Temp?Land Surface Temperature reflects heat-island intensity from satellite thermal bands.
LST Mean
30.7°C
Lower better
LST Min
22.7°C
Context
LST Max
39.5°C
Lower better
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
LST Mean 30.7°C 20°C best / 45°C worst
Weighted by formula
LST Score 57.1 0-100
Computed
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
LST Mean (°C) 30.7 30.8 30.7
LST Min (°C) 23.7 21.7 22.7
LST Max (°C) 39.4 39.6 39.5
LST Score 57.3 57.0 57.1
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher heat exposure affects comfort, cooling load and health risk.

🏗️ Built-up Density

Final Score: 29.0/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Built-up Density?Built-up density measures extent of developed surface versus open space.
Built-up %
71.0%
Lower better
Open Space %
29.0%
Higher better
Built-up Score
29.0
0-100
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Built-up % 71.0% Inverse scoring
Score = 100 - builtup%
Open Space % 29.0% Context
Info
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Built-up % 74.1% 67.9% 71.0%
Open Space % 25.9% 32.1% 29.0%
Built-up Score 25.9 32.1 29.0
💡 What does this mean for you?Very high built-up often raises heat and runoff while reducing open environmental buffers.

💡 Night-time Lights

Final Score: 60.7/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Night-time Lights?Nighttime lights are a proxy for economic activity and electrification intensity.
Avg Radiance
30.33
Higher better
Max Radiance
48.40
Context
NTL Score
60.7
0-100
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Avg Radiance 30.33 Scaled to 50
Score = min(100, avg/50*100)
NTL Score 60.7 0-100
Computed
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Avg Radiance 31.87 28.79 30.33
Max Radiance 52.18 44.63 48.40
NTL Score 63.7 57.6 60.7
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher radiance often indicates stronger urban activity but can correlate with light pollution.

🏞️ Water Bodies

Final Score: 90.6/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Water Bodies?Water-bodies score reflects permanent and seasonal water presence in the analysis radius.
Permanent Water
39.88%
Higher generally better
Seasonal Water
96.85%
Context
Water Score
100.0
0-100
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Permanent Water % 39.88% 70% weight
Scaled against 10%
Seasonal Water % 96.85% 30% weight
Scaled against 20%
Water Score 100.0 0-100
Computed
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Permanent Water % 7.31% 72.44% 39.88%
Seasonal Water % 95.80% 97.90% 96.85%
Water Score 81.2 100.0 100.0
💡 What does this mean for you?Water presence can support cooling, recharge and ecological quality.

👥 Population Density

Final Score: 64.5/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Population Density?Population density indicates urban crowding pressure around the area.
Population
102,206
Estimated residents
Density/km²
7,110.2
Lower better for this score
Score
64.5
0-100
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Density/km² 7,110.2 Inverse scale up to 20,000
Lower -> higher score
Score 64.5 0-100
Computed
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Population Total 24,708 179,704 102,206
Density / km² 7,864.7 6,355.7 7,110.2
Pop Density Score 60.7 68.2 64.5
💡 What does this mean for you?Extremely high density can increase pressure on services and mobility.

⛲ Groundwater

Final Score: 63.3/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Groundwater?Groundwater score combines moisture, recharge, drought and trend indicators.
Soil Moisture
133.977
Higher better
Recharge
-0.05
Higher better
PDSI
2.94
Higher better
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Soil Moisture 133.977 30% weight
Scaled
Recharge -0.05 25% weight
Scaled
PDSI 2.94 20% weight
Scaled
SM Trend 0.0000 15% weight
Scaled
Precipitation 1,874.36 10% weight
Scaled
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Soil Moisture 133.892 134.063 133.977
Recharge Estimate -0.20 0.09 -0.05
PDSI 2.97 2.91 2.94
Groundwater Score 63.3 63.2 63.3
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher score suggests better long-term aquifer and moisture support conditions.

🌧️ Waterlogging

↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Waterlogging?Waterlogging combines topography, imperviousness and wetness indices across nearby grid cells.
Grid Count
11
Sampled cells
Avg Susceptibility
51.4
Lower is safer
High Risk Grids
7
High / Very High
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTargetStatus
Avg Susceptibility 51.4 < 40
Concern
Avg Slope 3.00° > 1°
Good
Avg Impervious 81.7% < 70%
Concern
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher susceptibility and low slope increase monsoon water stagnation probability.

🚶 Walkability & Safety

↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Walkability & Safety?OSM amenity metrics reflect pedestrian, safety and urban accessibility infrastructure.
Footpaths
0
Higher better
Street Lamps
0
Higher better
Police/Fire Access
2
Presence
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Footpaths (500m) 0 ≥ 3
Concern
Sidewalk Roads (1km) 0 ≥ 5
Concern
Nearest Police Station 165 m ≤ 2000m
Context
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher OSM accessibility/safety features generally improve everyday livability.

⚠️ Risk Factors

↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Risk Factors?Nearby hazards and sensitive risk points mapped around this area.
Total Risks
6
Mapped points
Scoring Breakdown
CategoryRiskDistance / SeverityMeaning
Environmental Kho-Kho Nallah - Tikrapara Section 50 m / Critical Major city drain passing through densely populated area
Infrastructure Narrow Lanes - Tikrapara Old Town 100 m / High Heritage area lanes too narrow for emergency vehicles
Water_drainage Chronic Waterlogging - Tikrapara Gali 100 m / High Old city drainage unable to handle monsoon load, annual flooding
Safety_social Petty Crime Zone - Tikrapara Market 200 m / Medium Higher than average theft and chain snatching incidents
Health_nuisance Unauthorized Meat Processing 300 m / Medium Small-scale unauthorized meat shops with improper waste disposal
Land_zoning Historical Property Disputes 400 m / Medium Multiple generational property disputes in old city blocks
💡 What does this mean for you?Closer and severe risks can affect insurance, resale and safety comfort.

🌬️ Air Quality: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

💧 Water Quality: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🧹 Sanitation: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🛣️ Infrastructure: Infrastructure Score Formula

Formula: Composite weighted model from GHSL/ESA/VIIRS/Terrain features
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Urbanization index99.2620%SMOD
Built-up balance71.0%15%Best in moderate band
NTL stability70.0%15%Power/activity consistency
Avg building height7.98 m10%Vertical infra proxy
Impervious %46.0%10%Moderate is optimal
Radiance30.9910%Development proxy
Slope0.10°10%Flatter is better
Green support10.8%10%Tree + grass contribution
This is the same weighted structure used in Livability Infrastructure model.
Final: 80.07 / 100

🏥 Amenities: Amenity Score Breakdown

Formula: Each amenity category is capped at 100, final score is averaged across categories
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Hospitals 500m0 * 33Cap 100Health access
Schools 1km3 * 20Cap 100Education access
Markets 1km5 * 33Cap 100Daily needs
Parks 500m3 * 33Cap 100Open space
Transit 1km2 * 50Cap 100Mobility
Category multipliers mirror the Livability snapshot logic.
Final: Final from amenity_scores table

🌳 Green Cover: Green Score Formula

Formula: Score = (NDVI*40%) + (Vegetation*30%) + (Dense Green*20%) + (Parks*10%)
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
NDVI component0.233 => 46.640%18.6
Vegetation component31.0% => 31.030%9.3
Dense green component12.2% => 24.520%4.9
Parks component3 => 99.010%9.9
This matches the Livability GreenCover model weighting logic.
Final: 42.74 / 100

🔊 Noise: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🌊 Flood Risk: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🏚️ Earthquake Risk: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🌡️ Land Surface Temp: LST Score Formula

Formula: Score = ((45 - LST Mean) / 25) * 100, clipped to [0,100]
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
LST Mean30.72 °CReference20°C best, 45°C worst
Lower land surface temperature means better livability.
Final: 57.12 / 100

🏗️ Built-up Density: Built-up Score Formula

Formula: Score = 100 - Built-up %
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Built-up %71.0%InverseLower is better
Dense concrete surfaces reduce infiltration and increase heat islands.
Final: 29.00 / 100

💡 Night-time Lights: Night-time Lights Formula

Formula: Score = min(100, (Avg Radiance / 50) * 100)
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Avg Radiance30.33Scale 0-50Higher indicates activity
Higher night radiance generally tracks electrification and economic intensity.
Final: 60.66 / 100

🏞️ Water Bodies: Water Bodies Score Formula

Formula: Score = (Permanent Water Score * 70%) + (Seasonal Water Score * 30%)
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Permanent water39.88%70%Scaled against 10% benchmark
Seasonal water96.85%30%Scaled against 20% benchmark
Permanent water has higher score weight than seasonal water.
Final: 100.00 / 100

👥 Population Density: Population Density Formula

Formula: Score = ((20000 - density_per_km²) / 20000) * 100, clipped to [0,100]
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Density7,110.2 /km²Inverse scaleLower density -> higher score
This follows the Livability PopulationDensity model.
Final: 64.45 / 100

⛲ Groundwater: Groundwater Score Formula

Formula: Weighted: Soil Moisture 30% + Recharge 25% + PDSI 20% + Trend 15% + Precipitation 10%
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Soil moisture133.97730%Scaled to 0-200
Recharge estimate-0.0525%Scaled -200 to +400
PDSI2.9420%Scaled -4 to +4
SM trend0.000015%Scaled -50 to +50
Precipitation1,874.3610%Scaled 800 to 1800
Exactly reused from Livability Groundwater model logic.
Final: 63.28 / 100

🌧️ Waterlogging: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🚶 Walkability & Safety: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

⚠️ Risk Factors: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

View full livability report for Tikrapara →

Compliance Status

RERA registration, filings, and compliance flags based on public CG-RERA records.

Compliance Status Based on public CG-RERA records
4 Passed
2 N/A
RERA Registration Active
Reg No. PCGRERA311220001176 — Status: New
Section 3 · Source · RERA Official Page
No RERA Orders
No complaints or orders found against this project
Sec 38–63 · Source
No Orders in Last 12 Months
Clean record — no complaints or orders filed
Source
Within Timeline
Target completion: 31 Mar 2027
Section 4 · Source
Quarterly Updates Not Available
No compliance snapshot data on record
Section 11 · Source
Annual Audit Not Available
No compliance snapshot data on record
Section 4(2)(l)(D) · Source
Each check is based on publicly available CG-RERA portal data as of Jun 2026. How this works →

Details

Registration, professional team, bank, promoters, and compliance history.

Registration Details
RERA Number
PCGRERA311220001176
Status
New
Project Type
Mixed Development
Approved Date
31 Dec 2020
Original End Date
31 Dec 2025
EWS Category
NO
Construction Cost
₹ 721133000
Land Cost
₹ 436737000
Proposed Completion
31 Mar 2027
Authorised Person
vijay kumar
Website
www.sumeetinfracon.com
View on Map
Professional Team
RoleNameLicense / Membership
Statutory CA ANSHUL BEGANI 421159
Quarterly CA AMIT CHANDRA SHARMA 403708
Engineer ROHAN KUMAR GUPTA 702
Architect KARAN JAIN 1562/2022
Promoters
S
sumeet synfab india pvt. ltd. Company

Buildings & Units

Inventory overview, sold/unsold breakdown, and building details.

Inventory Overview
189
Total Inventory
36
Sold (19%)
150
Unsold (79%)
3
Mortgage (2%)
19%
79%
2%
Sold Unsold Mortgage
Quarterly Plot Updates
PeriodTotalSold (prev)Sold (qtr)RemainingMortgage
2026-01-01 – 2026-03-31 0 0 0 0 0
2025-10-01 – 2025-12-31 0 0 0 0 0
2025-07-01 – 2025-09-30 0 0 0 0 0
2025-04-01 – 2025-06-30 0 0 0 0 0
2025-01-01 – 2025-03-31 0 0 0 0 0
2024-10-01 – 2024-12-31 0 0 0 0 0
2024-07-01 – 2024-09-30 0 0 0 0 0
2024-04-01 – 2024-06-30 0 0 0 0 0
2024-01-01 – 2024-03-31 0 0 0 0 0
2023-10-01 – 2023-12-31 0 0 0 0 0
2023-07-01 – 2023-09-30 0 0 0 0 0
2023-04-01 – 2023-06-30 0 0 0 0 0
2023-01-01 – 2023-03-31 0 0 0 0 0
2022-10-01 – 2022-12-31 0 0 0 0 0
2022-07-01 – 2022-09-30 0 0 0 0 0
2022-04-01 – 2022-06-30 0 0 0 0 0
2022-01-01 – 2022-03-31 0 0 0 0 0
2021-10-01 – 2021-12-31 0 0 0 0 0
2021-07-01 – 2021-09-30 0 0 0 0 0
2021-04-01 – 2021-06-30 0 0 0 0 0
2021-01-01 – 2021-03-31 0 0 0 0 0
2020-12-31 – 2020-12-31 0 0 0 0 0
Quarterly Building Updates
PeriodTotalSold (prev)Sold (qtr)RemainingMortgage
2026-01-01 – 2026-03-31 0 0 0 0 0
2025-10-01 – 2025-12-31 0 0 0 0 0
2025-07-01 – 2025-09-30 0 0 0 0 0
2025-04-01 – 2025-06-30 0 0 0 0 0
2025-01-01 – 2025-03-31 0 0 0 0 0
2024-10-01 – 2024-12-31 0 0 0 0 0
2024-07-01 – 2024-09-30 0 0 0 0 0
2024-04-01 – 2024-06-30 0 0 0 0 0
2024-01-01 – 2024-03-31 0 0 0 0 0
2023-10-01 – 2023-12-31 0 0 0 0 0
2023-07-01 – 2023-09-30 0 0 0 0 0
2023-04-01 – 2023-06-30 0 0 0 0 0
2023-01-01 – 2023-03-31 0 0 0 0 0
2022-10-01 – 2022-12-31 0 0 0 0 0
2022-07-01 – 2022-09-30 0 0 0 0 0
2022-04-01 – 2022-06-30 0 0 0 0 0
2022-01-01 – 2022-03-31 0 0 0 0 0
2021-10-01 – 2021-12-31 0 0 0 0 0
2021-07-01 – 2021-09-30 0 0 0 0 0
2021-04-01 – 2021-06-30 0 0 0 0 0
2021-01-01 – 2021-03-31 0 0 0 0 0
2020-12-31 – 2020-12-31 0 0 0 0 0
Quarterly Apartment Updates
PeriodTotalSold (prev)Sold (qtr)RemainingMortgage
2026-01-01 – 2026-03-31 189 34 2 153 3
2025-10-01 – 2025-12-31 189 32 2 155 3
2025-07-01 – 2025-09-30 189 28 4 157 3
2025-04-01 – 2025-06-30 189 27 1 161 3
2025-01-01 – 2025-03-31 189 22 5 162 3
2024-10-01 – 2024-12-31 188 21 1 166 3
2024-07-01 – 2024-09-30 188 21 0 167 3
2024-04-01 – 2024-06-30 188 18 3 167 3
2024-01-01 – 2024-03-31 188 15 3 170 3
2023-10-01 – 2023-12-31 188 14 1 173 3
2023-07-01 – 2023-09-30 188 14 0 174 3
2023-04-01 – 2023-06-30 188 14 0 174 3
2023-01-01 – 2023-03-31 188 13 1 174 3
2022-10-01 – 2022-12-31 188 13 0 175 3
2022-07-01 – 2022-09-30 188 13 0 175 3
2022-04-01 – 2022-06-30 188 14 0 175 3
2022-01-01 – 2022-03-31 188 1 13 174 3
2021-10-01 – 2021-12-31 188 1 0 187 3
2021-07-01 – 2021-09-30 188 1 0 187 3
2021-04-01 – 2021-06-30 188 0 1 187 3
2021-01-01 – 2021-03-31 188 0 0 188 3
2020-12-31 – 2020-12-31 188 0 0 188 3

Legal Orders & Cases

RERA legal orders, complaints, and case statistics filed against this project.

Legal Orders (0)
ComplaintApplicantSectionDateSourcePDF
No orders found for this project.

Location

Project address, coordinates, and nearby places.

Location Details
Address
TIKRAPARA ,TAHSIL-RAIPUR,DIST - RAIPUR
District
Raipur
Tehsil
Raipur
Coordinates
21.2206149, 81.6455203 View on Map
Area Livability

Livability of Tikrapara Raipur

Environmental, infrastructure & amenity parameters for the area where this project is located (0.54 km from project). Each value is compared with the Raipur average.

Composite Livability Score
73.3 / 100
Grade B · Good
+3.7 vs Raipur avg (69.6)
Air Quality
100.0 Excellent
Area
100
City
99
+1.2 vs city avg
Water Quality
74.2 Good
Area
74
City
68
+6.2 vs city avg
Sanitation
56.6 Average
Area
57
City
56
+0.6 vs city avg
Green Cover
46.1 Below Avg
Area
46
City
39
+7.6 vs city avg
Noise Level
65.8 Good
Area
66
City
58
+7.5 vs city avg
Infrastructure
80.1 Excellent
Area
80
City
76
+4.3 vs city avg
Amenities
87.2 Excellent
Area
87
City
82
+5.3 vs city avg
Flood Safety
60.0 Average
Area
60
City
62
-2.2 vs city avg
Earthquake Safety
90.0 Excellent
Area
90
City
86
+4.5 vs city avg
Land Surface Temp.
57.1 Average
Area
57
City
58
-0.7 vs city avg
Built-up Density
29.0 Poor
Area
29
City
36
-6.5 vs city avg
Night-light Activity
60.7 Average
Area
61
City
54
+6.5 vs city avg
Water Bodies Nearby
90.6 Excellent
Area
91
City
93
-2.2 vs city avg
Population Density
64.5 Average
Area
64
City
68
-3.8 vs city avg
Groundwater Status
63.3 Average
Area
63
City
63
-0.1 vs city avg
View detailed livability report for Tikrapara
Neighborhood Intelligence

Explore nearby infrastructure around this project. Toggle categories to show/hide on the map.

Neighborhood Map 3 km radius
RERA Projects Near sumeet trade center (commercial) sumeet residency(residential) 30 found within 3 km
# Project District Status Distance
1 sumeet busIness park Raipur Ongoing 0.20 km
2 GULZAR HOMES Raipur Ongoing 0.28 km
3 WISDOM RESIDENCY Raipur Ongoing 0.74 km
4 MOSAIC BUSINESS & COMMUNITY CENTRE Raipur Ongoing 0.95 km
5 aviva green city Raipur Ongoing 0.98 km
6 SAMRAT VATIKA Raipur Ongoing 1.06 km
7 ASHOKA ROYAL A&B Raipur Ongoing 1.09 km
8 mittal' 16 Raipur Ongoing 1.11 km
9 chandra planet Raipur Ongoing 1.17 km
10 ASHOKA IKON PHASE -3 Raipur New 1.22 km
11 HAPPY HOMES Raipur Ongoing 1.25 km
12 LALGANGA REGALIA Raipur Ongoing 1.29 km
13 MAY FAIR Raipur Ongoing 1.54 km
14 jainam park Raipur New 1.59 km
15 aakrity Raipur Ongoing 1.66 km
16 BAJAJ SKY HEIGHTS Raipur New 1.68 km
17 SPARSH SQUARE Raipur Ongoing 1.74 km
18 SHIVA RESIDENCY PHASE - III Raipur Ongoing 1.74 km
19 VARDHMAN SKYLINE - RAIPUR Raipur Ongoing 1.74 km
20 SAI SILVER Raipur New 1.76 km
21 CHANDRA SPHINX Raipur Ongoing 1.80 km
22 SHIVA RESIDENCY PHASE - A-1 Raipur Ongoing 1.81 km
23 SIYA RESIDENCY PHASE -2 Raipur New 1.84 km
24 wallfort omega Raipur New 1.87 km
25 WALLFORT ELEGANTE Raipur Ongoing 1.93 km
26 AVENUE - 144 Raipur Ongoing 1.98 km
27 MADHURIMA APARTMENT Raipur New 1.99 km
28 samta parisar Raipur Ongoing 2.00 km
29 AVINASH NEOPOLIS PHASE-1 Raipur New 2.03 km
30 M/S SHIVNATH APARTMENTS Raipur New 2.07 km

Buyer Checklist

Documents and verifications a buyer should review before purchase.

Buyer Document Verification Checklist

Key documents a buyer should verify before purchasing in this project. Items marked Available have data on Seemankan.

5/14 verified
  • RERA Registration Certificate Available
    Confirms the project is registered with RERA CG. Verify registration number, validity dates, and project details on the RERA portal.
    RERA No: PCGRERA311220001176
    View on RERA Portal
  • Promoter Registration Certificate Verify Independently
    Builder / colonizer company registration certificate. Confirms the promoter entity is a registered firm, company, or society.
  • Approved Building / Sanction Plan Verify Independently
    Building plan sanctioned by the local authority. Verify floor count, setbacks, and FSI compliance.
  • Layout Plan Verify Independently
    Approved layout showing plot divisions, roads, open spaces, and common areas.
  • Title Deed / Ownership Proof Verify Independently
    Proof that the promoter legally owns the land. Verify via Sub-Registrar records.
  • Encumbrance Certificate Verify Independently
    Confirms the property is free from legal dues, mortgages, or liens. Obtain from Sub-Registrar office.
  • Land Use / Diversion Certificate Verify Independently
    Required if land was converted from agricultural to non-agricultural use.
  • Architect Certificate Available
    Certification from a registered architect confirming structural plans and compliance.
    View View View +24 more
  • Structural Engineer Certificate Available
    Certification from a structural engineer confirming building safety and load-bearing capacity.
    View View View +24 more
  • CA Financial Certificate Available
    Chartered Accountant certificate on financial status, project cost estimates, and fund utilization.
    View View View +20 more
  • Commencement Certificate Verify Independently
    Permission to begin construction issued by the local authority after plan approval.
  • NOCs (No Objection Certificates) Verify Independently
    NOCs from fire department, environment, water supply, electricity board, and other authorities.
  • Project Brochure / Specification Available
    Official brochure with unit types, amenities, and specifications. Compare with actual delivery.
    View View View +20 more
  • RERA Compliance Orders Verify Independently
    Check if any orders, penalties, or directions have been issued against this project by RERA.
Disclaimer: This checklist is for informational purposes only. "Available" means Seemankan has a copy from the RERA portal — it does not constitute legal verification. Always verify original documents with the concerned authorities and consult a legal advisor before making a purchase decision.

Risk Zone Within 5 km

Buffer zones (water bodies, airport restrictions) and risk sites (landfills, waste processing) detected within 3 km (immediate) and 5 km (extended) of the project.

24
Risk zones (within 5 km)
3 km: 13 3–5 km: 11
24
Water bodies (river/nala/lake)
3 km: 13 3–5 km: 11
0
Landfill / waste sites
3 km: 0 3–5 km: 0
0
Airport buffer overlap
3 km: 0 3–5 km: 0
Risk Zone Map (3 km & 5 km rings) Project marker centered
Water Bodies (24)
  • Pandri Nala ≤3 km
    Nala · 20m buffer
    0.7 km
  • Pandri Talab ≤3 km
    Tank · 50m buffer
    0.84 km
  • Mandir Hasaud Talab ≤3 km
    Tank · 50m buffer
    1.27 km
  • Shankar Nagar Nala ≤3 km
    Nala · 20m buffer
    1.51 km
  • Khamhardih Nala ≤3 km
    Drain · 20m buffer
    1.71 km
  • Budha Talab (Vivekananda Sarovar) ≤3 km
    Lake · 50m buffer
    1.81 km
  • Mathpurena Wetland ≤3 km
    Wetland · 75m buffer
    2.15 km
  • Amanaka Talab ≤3 km
    Tank · 50m buffer
    2.45 km

Documents

RERA-filed documents and disclosures available for this project.

RERA Documents (287)
AMOUNT (45)
View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View
APARTMENTPHOTO (138)
View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View
ARCH (27)
View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View
Ann19 (4)
View View View View
BOROUCHRE (23)
View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View
CA (23)
View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View
ENGG (27)
View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View

Reviews

Verified buyer reviews and ratings for this project.

No reviews yet. Be the first to review this project!

Login to Write a Review

You need to be signed in to submit a review for this project.

Login or Register

Log in to see the full page

This page shows a preview. Sign in (or create a free account) to unlock the full content, charts, and downloads.

Log in Create account