Home / RERA Projects / SAI SIMRAN BHAWNA NAGAR
ONGOING Residential Development RERA Page Project Website
GENERATE REPORT

SAI SIMRAN BHAWNA NAGAR

Compliance Status
Partial Compliance
21.2510, 81.6779 Explore area
District
Raipur
Area
—
Promoter
RAMS BUILDERS AND DEVELOPERS
Project Information
Promoter RAMS BUILDERS AND DEVELOPERS
Type Residential Development
Status Ongoing
Completion 31 Dec 2018
RERA No. PCGRERA060718000478
Registered 06 Jul 2018
Original End 31 Dec 2018
EWS Category NO
Construction Cost ₹ 71756000
Land Cost ₹ 18479000
Authorised Person sunil kumar ahuj
Website www.ramsbuildersanddevelopers.com
Address rajendra prasad ward no. 28, raipur (c.g.)
At a Glance
-
Total Units
-
Units Sold
-
Unsold
0
Legal Cases
Dec 2018
Target Completion
100%
Completion
Amenities & Facilities (8)
BOUNDARY WALL
100%
INTERNAL ROADS AND FOOTPATHS
100%
lift
100%
SECURITY SERVICE
100%
SEWERAGE
100%
STREET LIGHTING
100%
WATER CONSERVATION RAIN WATER HARVESTING
100%
WATER SUPPLY
100%
Project Professionals
CA ALOK KUMAR AGRAWAL
STATUTORY CA
UTTAM KUMAR GARG
QUARTERLY CA
MR. SAMEER GHORPADE
ENGINEER
AR. SAMEER GHORPADE
ARCHITECT
Project Analysis

360° Project Intelligence

Comprehensive analysis across regulatory, livability, market, filing activity, and market readiness dimensions.

Regulatory
93
13 of 14 checks · Strong Signals
Livability
59
Shri Ram Nagar · Moderate Signals
Legal
0
No legal orders on record · 30 nearby
Filing Activity
149
131 docs · 18 quarterly updates
Market Readiness
35
Ongoing · due Dec 2018
Area Livability

Livability of Shri Ram Nagar

Eighteen environmental, infrastructure and amenity parameters for the nearest mapped area (Shri Ram Nagar — 0.83 km from this project). Click any parameter for the underlying readings, thresholds and what they mean.



🏠 Livability Parameters

Latest readings for Shri Ram Nagar. Only parameters with available data are shown below. Based on the latest readings for Shri Ram Nagar.

C
Composite Score
58.7 /100
Average

🌬️ Air Quality

Final Score: 95.6/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Air Quality?AQI summarizes PM2.5, PM10 and gases. Lower pollution values improve public health outcomes.
AQI
61
Satisfactory
PM2.5
31.0 µg/m³
≤ 40
PM10
115.8 µg/m³
≤ 60
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
PM2.5 31.0 µg/m³ ≤ 40
Good
PM10 115.8 µg/m³ ≤ 60
Concern
NO₂ 12.5 µg/m³ ≤ 40
Good
💡 What does this mean for you?Cleaner air lowers respiratory burden and improves outdoor comfort.

💧 Water Quality

Final Score: 77.5/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Water Quality?Water quality combines chemistry, supply duration and contamination markers.
TDS
361 ppm
≤ 500
pH
7.78
6.5–8.5
Supply
8.4 hr/day
≥ 8 hr
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
TDS 361 ppm ≤ 500
Good
Fluoride 0.59 mg/L ≤ 1.0
Good
Turbidity 3.6 NTU ≤ 1
Concern
💡 What does this mean for you?Better supply quality and consistency reduces dependence on tanker/groundwater fallback.

🧹 Sanitation

Final Score: 60.1/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Sanitation?Sanitation reflects ODF status, sewage treatment and waste management regularity.
ODF
ODF+
ODF++
Sewage Coverage
45%
≥ 80%
Drainage
58%
≥ 90%
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
ODF Status ODF+ ODF++
Info
Sewage Coverage 45% ≥ 80%
Concern
Drainage Coverage 58% ≥ 90%
Concern
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher sanitation maturity lowers disease exposure and neighborhood nuisance.

🛣️ Infrastructure

Final Score: 78.0/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Infrastructure?Infrastructure score combines land use, urbanization, built form, night lights and terrain indicators.
Built-up
60.2%
Balanced band
Tree Cover
15.9%
≥ 15%
Urbanization
100.0
Higher better
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Built-up (LULC) 60.2% 40-70%
Contextual
Impervious Surface 24.0% < 70%
Good
NDVI Mean 0.270 > 0.3
Concern
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Built-up (LULC) % 68.7% 51.8% 60.2%
Tree Cover % 12.9% 18.9% 15.9%
Urbanization Index 100.0 100.0 100.0
Infra Score 78.8 77.2 80.0
💡 What does this mean for you?Balanced built + green mix usually improves long-term livability resilience.

🏥 Amenities

Final Score: 69.0/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Amenities?Amenity score captures daily-access services in walk/short-drive radii.
Hospitals 500m
0
Target ≥1
Schools 1km
3
Target ≥3
Parks 500m
0
Target ≥1
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Hospitals (500m) 0 ≥1
Concern
Schools (1km) 3 ≥3
Good
Markets (1km) 5 ≥1
Good
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher local amenity density improves convenience and walkability.

🌳 Green Cover

Final Score: 37.6/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Green Cover?NDVI and vegetation structure are measured from satellite imagery to estimate neighborhood greenery.
NDVI Mean
0.259
Greenness index
Vegetation
27.6%
% green pixels
Dense Green
13.7%
Thick canopy
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
NDVI Mean 0.259 0.5 maps to score 100
Weighted 40%
Vegetation % 27.6% Direct % (cap 100)
Weighted 30%
Dense Green % 13.7% Scaled from 50%
Weighted 20%
Parks within 500m 0 Count * 33 (cap 100)
Weighted 10%
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
NDVI Mean 0.255 0.262 0.259
Vegetation % 21.1% 34.1% 27.6%
Dense Green % 11.3% 16.0% 13.7%
Tree Canopy % 18.8% 15.4% 17.1%
Green Score 31.3 37.6 34.5
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher green metrics typically reduce heat stress and improve comfort.

🔊 Noise

Final Score: 45.9/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Noise?Noise uses measured day/night dB compared to CPCB zone limits.
Day dB
48.7
vs CPCB day limit
Night dB
43.8
vs CPCB night limit
Zone
commercial
CPCB class
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Day Noise 48.7 dB ≤ 65.0 dB
Good
Night Noise 43.8 dB ≤ 55.0 dB
Good
Nearest Highway 1,231 m Higher usually quieter
Info
💡 What does this mean for you?Chronic high noise impacts stress, sleep quality and perceived comfort.

🌊 Flood Risk

Final Score: 55.0/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Flood Risk?Flood risk combines river exposure and local waterlogging vulnerability.
Overall Risk
High
Lower is safer
River Risk
Medium
Lower is safer
Waterlogging
High
Lower is safer
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Overall Risk High Low preferred
Info
River Flood Risk Medium Low preferred
Info
Waterlogging Risk High Low preferred
Info
💡 What does this mean for you?Lower flood risk means less disruption and lower hazard exposure.

🏚️ Earthquake Risk

Final Score: 10.0/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Earthquake Risk?Earthquake profile uses seismic zone, PGA and soil/liquefaction risk factors.
Seismic Zone
Zone II
Lower risk zone preferred
Risk Level
Low
Low preferred
Liquefaction
None
Low preferred
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Seismic Zone Zone II II preferred
Info
Risk Level Low Low preferred
Info
PGA (475yr) 0.0155g Lower preferred
Info
💡 What does this mean for you?Lower seismic hazard reduces structural and insurance risk exposure.

🌡️ Land Surface Temp

Final Score: 63.9/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Land Surface Temp?Land Surface Temperature reflects heat-island intensity from satellite thermal bands.
LST Mean
29.0°C
Lower better
LST Min
3.5°C
Context
LST Max
39.9°C
Lower better
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
LST Mean 29.0°C 20°C best / 45°C worst
Weighted by formula
LST Score 63.9 0-100
Computed
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
LST Mean (°C) 29.0 29.0 29.0
LST Min (°C) 2.4 4.6 3.5
LST Max (°C) 39.8 39.9 39.9
LST Score 64.0 63.8 63.9
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher heat exposure affects comfort, cooling load and health risk.

🏗️ Built-up Density

Final Score: 39.8/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Built-up Density?Built-up density measures extent of developed surface versus open space.
Built-up %
60.2%
Lower better
Open Space %
39.8%
Higher better
Built-up Score
39.8
0-100
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Built-up % 60.2% Inverse scoring
Score = 100 - builtup%
Open Space % 39.8% Context
Info
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Built-up % 68.7% 51.8% 60.2%
Open Space % 31.3% 48.3% 39.8%
Built-up Score 31.3 48.3 39.8
💡 What does this mean for you?Very high built-up often raises heat and runoff while reducing open environmental buffers.

💡 Night-time Lights

Final Score: 48.7/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Night-time Lights?Nighttime lights are a proxy for economic activity and electrification intensity.
Avg Radiance
24.36
Higher better
Max Radiance
40.57
Context
NTL Score
48.7
0-100
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Avg Radiance 24.36 Scaled to 50
Score = min(100, avg/50*100)
NTL Score 48.7 0-100
Computed
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Avg Radiance 24.84 23.88 24.36
Max Radiance 43.59 37.54 40.57
NTL Score 49.7 47.8 48.7
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher radiance often indicates stronger urban activity but can correlate with light pollution.

🏞️ Water Bodies

Final Score: 100.0/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Water Bodies?Water-bodies score reflects permanent and seasonal water presence in the analysis radius.
Permanent Water
66.76%
Higher generally better
Seasonal Water
96.97%
Context
Water Score
100.0
0-100
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Permanent Water % 66.76% 70% weight
Scaled against 10%
Seasonal Water % 96.97% 30% weight
Scaled against 20%
Water Score 100.0 0-100
Computed
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Permanent Water % 64.25% 69.26% 66.76%
Seasonal Water % 96.25% 97.68% 96.97%
Water Score 100.0 100.0 100.0
💡 What does this mean for you?Water presence can support cooling, recharge and ecological quality.

👥 Population Density

Final Score: 71.1/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Population Density?Population density indicates urban crowding pressure around the area.
Population
80,555
Estimated residents
Density/km²
5,778.8
Lower better for this score
Score
71.1
0-100
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Density/km² 5,778.8 Inverse scale up to 20,000
Lower -> higher score
Score 71.1 0-100
Computed
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Population Total 20,709 140,401 80,555
Density / km² 6,591.8 4,965.7 5,778.8
Pop Density Score 67.0 75.2 71.1
💡 What does this mean for you?Extremely high density can increase pressure on services and mobility.

⛲ Groundwater

Final Score: 63.9/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Groundwater?Groundwater score combines moisture, recharge, drought and trend indicators.
Soil Moisture
134.688
Higher better
Recharge
2.59
Higher better
PDSI
3.08
Higher better
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Soil Moisture 134.688 30% weight
Scaled
Recharge 2.59 25% weight
Scaled
PDSI 3.08 20% weight
Scaled
SM Trend 0.0000 15% weight
Scaled
Precipitation 1,865.50 10% weight
Scaled
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Soil Moisture 134.642 134.733 134.688
Recharge Estimate 3.10 2.07 2.59
PDSI 3.10 3.06 3.08
Groundwater Score 63.9 63.8 63.9
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher score suggests better long-term aquifer and moisture support conditions.

🌧️ Waterlogging

↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Waterlogging?Waterlogging combines topography, imperviousness and wetness indices across nearby grid cells.
Grid Count
7
Sampled cells
Avg Susceptibility
52.9
Lower is safer
High Risk Grids
5
High / Very High
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTargetStatus
Avg Susceptibility 52.9 < 40
Concern
Avg Slope 2.89° > 1°
Good
Avg Impervious 40.4% < 70%
Good
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher susceptibility and low slope increase monsoon water stagnation probability.

🚶 Walkability & Safety

↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Walkability & Safety?OSM amenity metrics reflect pedestrian, safety and urban accessibility infrastructure.
Footpaths
0
Higher better
Street Lamps
0
Higher better
Police/Fire Access
1
Presence
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Footpaths (500m) 0 ≥ 3
Concern
Sidewalk Roads (1km) 0 ≥ 5
Concern
Nearest Police Station 1,246 m ≤ 2000m
Context
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher OSM accessibility/safety features generally improve everyday livability.

⚠️ Risk Factors

↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Risk Factors?Nearby hazards and sensitive risk points mapped around this area.
Total Risks
3
Mapped points
Scoring Breakdown
CategoryRiskDistance / SeverityMeaning
Infrastructure Summer Load Shedding 0 m / Low Scheduled power cuts during peak summer demand
Water_drainage Entrance Road Ponding 100 m / Low Colony entrance road develops water ponding during rains
Accessibility Auto Stand Distant 800 m / Low Nearest auto-rickshaw stand 800m walk from colony interior
💡 What does this mean for you?Closer and severe risks can affect insurance, resale and safety comfort.

🌬️ Air Quality: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

💧 Water Quality: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🧹 Sanitation: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🛣️ Infrastructure: Infrastructure Score Formula

Formula: Composite weighted model from GHSL/ESA/VIIRS/Terrain features
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Urbanization index100.0020%SMOD
Built-up balance60.2%15%Best in moderate band
NTL stability70.0%15%Power/activity consistency
Avg building height8.33 m10%Vertical infra proxy
Impervious %24.0%10%Moderate is optimal
Radiance24.5710%Development proxy
Slope0.10°10%Flatter is better
Green support15.9%10%Tree + grass contribution
This is the same weighted structure used in Livability Infrastructure model.
Final: 79.96 / 100

🏥 Amenities: Amenity Score Breakdown

Formula: Each amenity category is capped at 100, final score is averaged across categories
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Hospitals 500m0 * 33Cap 100Health access
Schools 1km3 * 20Cap 100Education access
Markets 1km5 * 33Cap 100Daily needs
Parks 500m0 * 33Cap 100Open space
Transit 1km0 * 50Cap 100Mobility
Category multipliers mirror the Livability snapshot logic.
Final: Final from amenity_scores table

🌳 Green Cover: Green Score Formula

Formula: Score = (NDVI*40%) + (Vegetation*30%) + (Dense Green*20%) + (Parks*10%)
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
NDVI component0.259 => 51.840%20.7
Vegetation component27.6% => 27.630%8.3
Dense green component13.7% => 27.320%5.5
Parks component0 => 0.010%0.0
This matches the Livability GreenCover model weighting logic.
Final: 34.46 / 100

🔊 Noise: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🌊 Flood Risk: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🏚️ Earthquake Risk: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🌡️ Land Surface Temp: LST Score Formula

Formula: Score = ((45 - LST Mean) / 25) * 100, clipped to [0,100]
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
LST Mean29.02 °CReference20°C best, 45°C worst
Lower land surface temperature means better livability.
Final: 63.92 / 100

🏗️ Built-up Density: Built-up Score Formula

Formula: Score = 100 - Built-up %
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Built-up %60.2%InverseLower is better
Dense concrete surfaces reduce infiltration and increase heat islands.
Final: 39.78 / 100

💡 Night-time Lights: Night-time Lights Formula

Formula: Score = min(100, (Avg Radiance / 50) * 100)
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Avg Radiance24.36Scale 0-50Higher indicates activity
Higher night radiance generally tracks electrification and economic intensity.
Final: 48.71 / 100

🏞️ Water Bodies: Water Bodies Score Formula

Formula: Score = (Permanent Water Score * 70%) + (Seasonal Water Score * 30%)
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Permanent water66.76%70%Scaled against 10% benchmark
Seasonal water96.97%30%Scaled against 20% benchmark
Permanent water has higher score weight than seasonal water.
Final: 100.00 / 100

👥 Population Density: Population Density Formula

Formula: Score = ((20000 - density_per_km²) / 20000) * 100, clipped to [0,100]
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Density5,778.8 /km²Inverse scaleLower density -> higher score
This follows the Livability PopulationDensity model.
Final: 71.11 / 100

⛲ Groundwater: Groundwater Score Formula

Formula: Weighted: Soil Moisture 30% + Recharge 25% + PDSI 20% + Trend 15% + Precipitation 10%
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Soil moisture134.68830%Scaled to 0-200
Recharge estimate2.5925%Scaled -200 to +400
PDSI3.0820%Scaled -4 to +4
SM trend0.000015%Scaled -50 to +50
Precipitation1,865.5010%Scaled 800 to 1800
Exactly reused from Livability Groundwater model logic.
Final: 63.85 / 100

🌧️ Waterlogging: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🚶 Walkability & Safety: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

⚠️ Risk Factors: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

View full livability report for Shri Ram Nagar →

Compliance Status

RERA registration, filings, and compliance flags based on public CG-RERA records.

Compliance Status Based on public CG-RERA records
3 Passed
1 Issue(s)
2 N/A
RERA Registration Active
Reg No. PCGRERA060718000478 — Status: Ongoing
Section 3 · Source · View Certificate · RERA Official Page
No RERA Orders
No complaints or orders found against this project
Sec 38–63 · Source
No Orders in Last 12 Months
Clean record — no complaints or orders filed
Source
Completion Overdue
Was due 31 Dec 2018 — overdue by ~89 month(s)
Section 4 · Source
Quarterly Updates Not Available
No compliance snapshot data on record
Section 11 · Source
Annual Audit Not Available
No compliance snapshot data on record
Section 4(2)(l)(D) · Source
Each check is based on publicly available CG-RERA portal data as of May 2026. How this works →
Other Projects by Same Promoter (4)
ProjectRERA No.StatusDistrictType
SAI SHARDHA PCGRERA050718000468 Ongoing Raipur Residential Development
SAI SILVER PCGRERA140618000150 New Raipur Residential Development
SAI SIMRAN PURENA PCGRERA050718000469 Ongoing Raipur Residential Development
sai twins PCGRERA140618000166 New Raipur Residential Development

Details

Registration, professional team, bank, promoters, and compliance history.

Registration Details
RERA Number
PCGRERA060718000478
Status
Ongoing
Project Type
Residential Development
Approved Date
06 Jul 2018
Original End Date
31 Dec 2018
EWS Category
NO
Construction Cost
₹ 71756000
Land Cost
₹ 18479000
Proposed Completion
31 Dec 2018
Authorised Person
sunil kumar ahuj
Website
www.ramsbuildersanddevelopers.com
View on Map
Professional Team
RoleNameLicense / Membership
Statutory CA CA ALOK KUMAR AGRAWAL 413331
Quarterly CA Uttam kumar garg 060726
Engineer MR. SAMEER GHORPADE -
Architect AR. SAMEER GHORPADE -
Promoters
R
RAMS BUILDERS AND DEVELOPERS Partnership Firm

Legal Orders & Cases

RERA legal orders, complaints, and case statistics filed against this project.

Legal Orders (0)
ComplaintApplicantSectionDateSourcePDF
No orders found for this project.

Location

Project address, coordinates, and nearby places.

Location Details
Address
rajendra prasad ward no. 28, raipur (c.g.)
District
Raipur
Tehsil
Raipur
Coordinates
21.2509733, 81.6778642 View on Map
Area Livability

Livability of Shri Ram Nagar Raipur

Environmental, infrastructure & amenity parameters for the area where this project is located (0.83 km from project). Each value is compared with the Raipur average.

Composite Livability Score
58.7 / 100
Grade C · Average
+0.4 vs Raipur avg (58.3)
Air Quality
95.6 Excellent
Area
96
City
89
+6.6 vs city avg
Water Quality
77.5 Good
Area
78
City
68
+9.6 vs city avg
Sanitation
60.1 Average
Area
60
City
56
+4.1 vs city avg
Green Cover
37.6 Below Avg
Area
38
City
39
-0.9 vs city avg
Noise Level
45.9 Below Avg
Area
46
City
58
-11.9 vs city avg
Infrastructure
78.0 Good
Area
78
City
76
+1.8 vs city avg
Amenities
69.0 Good
Area
69
City
82
-12.8 vs city avg
Flood Safety
55.0 Average
Area
55
City
38
+16.9 vs city avg
Earthquake Safety
10.0 Poor
Area
10
City
15
-4.6 vs city avg
Land Surface Temp.
63.9 Average
Area
64
City
58
+6.1 vs city avg
Built-up Density
39.8 Below Avg
Area
40
City
35
+5.0 vs city avg
Night-light Activity
48.7 Below Avg
Area
49
City
55
-6.0 vs city avg
Water Bodies Nearby
100.0 Excellent
Area
100
City
93
+7.3 vs city avg
Population Density
71.1 Good
Area
71
City
68
+3.2 vs city avg
Groundwater Status
63.9 Average
Area
64
City
63
+0.5 vs city avg
View detailed livability report for Shri Ram Nagar
Neighborhood Intelligence

Explore nearby infrastructure around this project. Toggle categories to show/hide on the map.

Neighborhood Map 3 km radius
RERA Projects Near sai simran bhawna nagar 30 found within 3 km
# Project District Status Distance
1 shri krishna vatika Raipur New 0.07 km
2 bhardwaj sky Raipur New 0.29 km
3 AGRASAR PRIDE Raipur Ongoing 0.30 km
4 Samriddhi atlantis Raipur New 0.30 km
5 srishtis imperia phase-1 Raipur New 0.31 km
6 SAMRIDDHI ATLANTIS PHASE-2 Raipur New 0.35 km
7 the address Raipur New 0.37 km
8 Bhardwaj sky phase ii Raipur New 0.37 km
9 METRO HEXA Raipur New 0.41 km
10 SRISHTIS IMPERIA PHASE IV Raipur New 0.42 km
11 SURYODAYA WONDER 16 Raipur New 0.46 km
12 V3 ASHIYANA Raipur New 0.49 km
13 SAMRIDDHI ALTUS Raipur New 0.50 km
14 "SHRIJAN" PREMIUM Raipur Ongoing 0.52 km
15 RAMAYAN LIFE STYLE RESIDENCY Raipur Ongoing 0.58 km
16 BANYAN TREE ENCLAVE Raipur Ongoing 0.59 km
17 SAMPOORNA HOMES (PHASE-I) Raipur New 0.63 km
18 Sanman Homz Raipur New 0.83 km
19 august silver moon Raipur New 0.92 km
20 green glory Raipur Ongoing 0.95 km
21 VIP - avenue , VIP ESTATE Raipur New 1.03 km
22 ASHOKA KOHINOOR PHASE - 2 Raipur Ongoing 1.09 km
23 ONYX- 18 Raipur New 1.13 km
24 ASHOKA IKON PHASE - 2 Raipur Ongoing 1.16 km
25 SAFFRON COMFORTS Raipur New 1.17 km
26 ASHOKA ROYAL - C Raipur Ongoing 1.21 km
27 high park phase - 2 Raipur New 1.22 km
28 MAGNETO SIGNATURE HOMES -II APARTMENT Raipur New 1.22 km
29 magneto signature homes - ii Raipur Ongoing 1.23 km
30 high park phase- i Raipur New 1.24 km

Buyer Checklist

Documents and verifications a buyer should review before purchase.

Buyer Document Verification Checklist

Key documents a buyer should verify before purchasing in this project. Items marked Available have data on Seemankan.

12/14 verified
  • RERA Registration Certificate Available
    Confirms the project is registered with RERA CG. Verify registration number, validity dates, and project details on the RERA portal.
    RERA No: PCGRERA060718000478
    View Certificate View on RERA Portal
  • Promoter Registration Certificate Available
    Builder / colonizer company registration certificate. Confirms the promoter entity is a registered firm, company, or society.
    Preview Preview
  • Approved Building / Sanction Plan Available
    Building plan sanctioned by the local authority. Verify floor count, setbacks, and FSI compliance.
    Preview
  • Layout Plan Available
    Approved layout showing plot divisions, roads, open spaces, and common areas.
    Preview
  • Title Deed / Ownership Proof Available
    Proof that the promoter legally owns the land. Verify via Sub-Registrar records.
    Preview
  • Encumbrance Certificate Available
    Confirms the property is free from legal dues, mortgages, or liens. Obtain from Sub-Registrar office.
    Preview
  • Land Use / Diversion Certificate Available
    Required if land was converted from agricultural to non-agricultural use.
    Preview
  • Architect Certificate Available
    Certification from a registered architect confirming structural plans and compliance.
    View View View +1 more
  • Structural Engineer Certificate Available
    Certification from a structural engineer confirming building safety and load-bearing capacity.
    View View View +1 more
  • CA Financial Certificate Available
    Chartered Accountant certificate on financial status, project cost estimates, and fund utilization.
    Preview View View +4 more
  • Commencement Certificate Available
    Permission to begin construction issued by the local authority after plan approval.
    Download Download Download +1 more
  • NOCs (No Objection Certificates) Verify Independently
    NOCs from fire department, environment, water supply, electricity board, and other authorities.
  • Project Brochure / Specification Available
    Official brochure with unit types, amenities, and specifications. Compare with actual delivery.
    Preview Preview
  • RERA Compliance Orders Verify Independently
    Check if any orders, penalties, or directions have been issued against this project by RERA.
Disclaimer: This checklist is for informational purposes only. "Available" means Seemankan has a copy from the RERA portal — it does not constitute legal verification. Always verify original documents with the concerned authorities and consult a legal advisor before making a purchase decision.

Risk Zone Within 5 km

Buffer zones (water bodies, airport restrictions) and risk sites (landfills, waste processing) detected within 3 km (immediate) and 5 km (extended) of the project.

18
Risk zones (within 5 km)
3 km: 8 3–5 km: 10
16
Water bodies (river/nala/lake)
3 km: 6 3–5 km: 10
2
Landfill / waste sites
3 km: 2 3–5 km: 0
0
Airport buffer overlap
3 km: 0 3–5 km: 0
Risk Zone Map (3 km & 5 km rings) Project marker centered
Water Bodies (16)
  • Heerapur Talab ≤3 km
    Pond · 50m buffer
    0.54 km
  • Kharun Left Bank Canal ≤3 km
    Canal · 20m buffer
    1.05 km
  • Telibandha Nala ≤3 km
    Nala · 20m buffer
    1.98 km
  • Telibandha Talab (Marine Drive) ≤3 km
    Lake · 50m buffer
    2.37 km
  • Kharun River ≤3 km
    River · 75m buffer
    2.37 km
  • Muktangan Talab ≤3 km
    Tank · 50m buffer
    2.51 km
  • Dunda Talab 3–5 km
    Pond · 50m buffer
    3.04 km
  • Boriyakhurd Talab 3–5 km
    Tank · 50m buffer
    3.63 km
Landfill / Waste Sites (2)
  • SLRM Centre Tendua (Tundra) ≤3 km
    Waste processing · 200m buffer
    2.07 km
  • Daldal Seoni MSW Transfer Station ≤3 km
    Transfer station · 100m buffer
    2.91 km

Reviews

Verified buyer reviews and ratings for this project.

No reviews yet. Be the first to review this project!

Login to Write a Review

You need to be signed in to submit a review for this project.

Login or Register