Home / RERA Projects / EXTENSION OF GALAXY PREMIUM
NEW Residential Plotted Development RERA Page Project Website
GENERATE REPORT

EXTENSION OF GALAXY PREMIUM

Compliance Status
Compliant
21.2839, 81.7302 Explore area
District
Raipur
Area
—
Promoter
MAHAMAYA INFRAREALITIES PVT. LTD.
Project Information
Promoter MAHAMAYA INFRAREALITIES PVT. LTD.
Type Residential Plotted Development
Status New
Completion 25 May 2027
RERA No. PCGRERA010223001598
Registered 01 Feb 2023
Original End 25 May 2027
Total Units 31 · 24 sold
EWS Category NO
Construction Cost ₹ 14900000
Land Cost ₹ 4805000
Authorised Person Ashok Agrawal
Website www.galaxygreenraipur.com
Address P.H. No. 00075, KH no. 74/1, 74/9 at village Sakri, R.N.M. Raipur, Dist Raipur C.G.
At a Glance
31
Total Units
24
Units Sold
1
Unsold
0
Legal Cases
May 2027
Target Completion
100%
Completion
Amenities & Facilities (6)
ENERGY MAANAGEMENT
100%
INTERNAL ROADS AND FOOTPATHS
100%
LANDSCAPING AND TREE PLANTING
100%
SEWERAGE
100%
STREET LIGHTING
100%
WATER SUPPLY
100%
Project Professionals
AKANCHA GUPTA
STATUTORY CA
SANJEEB KUMAR JAIN
QUARTERLY CA
RUCHIR GUMASTA
ENGINEER
HIREN S CHANIARA
ARCHITECT
Project Analysis

360° Project Intelligence

Comprehensive analysis across regulatory, livability, market, filing activity, and market readiness dimensions.

Regulatory
86
12 of 14 checks · Strong Signals
Livability
60
Saddu · Moderate Signals
Legal
0
No legal orders on record · 30 nearby
Filing Activity
194
164 docs · 30 quarterly updates
Market Readiness
25
New · due May 2027
Area Livability

Livability of Saddu

Eighteen environmental, infrastructure and amenity parameters for the nearest mapped area (Saddu — 3.18 km from this project). Click any parameter for the underlying readings, thresholds and what they mean.



🏠 Livability Parameters

Latest readings for Saddu. Only parameters with available data are shown below. Based on the latest readings for Saddu.

C
Composite Score
59.9 /100
Average

🌬️ Air Quality

Final Score: 95.6/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Air Quality?AQI summarizes PM2.5, PM10 and gases. Lower pollution values improve public health outcomes.
AQI
61
Satisfactory
PM2.5
34.9 µg/m³
≤ 40
PM10
63.7 µg/m³
≤ 60
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
PM2.5 34.9 µg/m³ ≤ 40
Good
PM10 63.7 µg/m³ ≤ 60
Concern
NO₂ 17.2 µg/m³ ≤ 40
Good
💡 What does this mean for you?Cleaner air lowers respiratory burden and improves outdoor comfort.

💧 Water Quality

Final Score: 74.8/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Water Quality?Water quality combines chemistry, supply duration and contamination markers.
TDS
333 ppm
≤ 500
pH
7.50
6.5–8.5
Supply
5.8 hr/day
≥ 8 hr
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
TDS 333 ppm ≤ 500
Good
Fluoride 0.53 mg/L ≤ 1.0
Good
Turbidity 5.3 NTU ≤ 1
Concern
💡 What does this mean for you?Better supply quality and consistency reduces dependence on tanker/groundwater fallback.

🧹 Sanitation

Final Score: 49.2/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Sanitation?Sanitation reflects ODF status, sewage treatment and waste management regularity.
ODF
ODF
ODF++
Sewage Coverage
38%
≥ 80%
Drainage
48%
≥ 90%
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
ODF Status ODF ODF++
Info
Sewage Coverage 38% ≥ 80%
Concern
Drainage Coverage 48% ≥ 90%
Concern
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher sanitation maturity lowers disease exposure and neighborhood nuisance.

🛣️ Infrastructure

Final Score: 60.6/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Infrastructure?Infrastructure score combines land use, urbanization, built form, night lights and terrain indicators.
Built-up
23.9%
Balanced band
Tree Cover
13.7%
≥ 15%
Urbanization
88.9
Higher better
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Built-up (LULC) 23.9% 40-70%
Contextual
Impervious Surface 22.6% < 70%
Good
NDVI Mean 0.280 > 0.3
Concern
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Built-up (LULC) % 27.8% 19.9% 23.9%
Tree Cover % 14.3% 13.1% 13.7%
Urbanization Index 100.0 77.7 88.9
Infra Score 66.7 54.6 60.7
💡 What does this mean for you?Balanced built + green mix usually improves long-term livability resilience.

🏥 Amenities

Final Score: 78.6/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Amenities?Amenity score captures daily-access services in walk/short-drive radii.
Hospitals 500m
2
Target ≥1
Schools 1km
5
Target ≥3
Parks 500m
1
Target ≥1
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Hospitals (500m) 2 ≥1
Good
Schools (1km) 5 ≥3
Good
Markets (1km) 9 ≥1
Good
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher local amenity density improves convenience and walkability.

🌳 Green Cover

Final Score: 33.3/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Green Cover?NDVI and vegetation structure are measured from satellite imagery to estimate neighborhood greenery.
NDVI Mean
0.201
Greenness index
Vegetation
28.6%
% green pixels
Dense Green
13.4%
Thick canopy
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
NDVI Mean 0.201 0.5 maps to score 100
Weighted 40%
Vegetation % 28.6% Direct % (cap 100)
Weighted 30%
Dense Green % 13.4% Scaled from 50%
Weighted 20%
Parks within 500m 1 Count * 33 (cap 100)
Weighted 10%
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
NDVI Mean 0.198 0.203 0.201
Vegetation % 29.7% 27.4% 28.6%
Dense Green % 13.0% 13.9% 13.4%
Tree Canopy % 13.7% 11.9% 12.8%
Green Score 33.2 33.3 33.3
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher green metrics typically reduce heat stress and improve comfort.

🔊 Noise

Final Score: 52.3/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Noise?Noise uses measured day/night dB compared to CPCB zone limits.
Day dB
47.2
vs CPCB day limit
Night dB
39.1
vs CPCB night limit
Zone
commercial
CPCB class
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Day Noise 47.2 dB ≤ 65.0 dB
Good
Night Noise 39.1 dB ≤ 55.0 dB
Good
Nearest Highway 386 m Higher usually quieter
Info
💡 What does this mean for you?Chronic high noise impacts stress, sleep quality and perceived comfort.

🌊 Flood Risk

Final Score: 70.0/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Flood Risk?Flood risk combines river exposure and local waterlogging vulnerability.
Overall Risk
Highest
Lower is safer
River Risk
High
Lower is safer
Waterlogging
High
Lower is safer
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Overall Risk Highest Low preferred
Info
River Flood Risk High Low preferred
Info
Waterlogging Risk High Low preferred
Info
💡 What does this mean for you?Lower flood risk means less disruption and lower hazard exposure.

🏚️ Earthquake Risk

Final Score: 25.0/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Earthquake Risk?Earthquake profile uses seismic zone, PGA and soil/liquefaction risk factors.
Seismic Zone
Zone II
Lower risk zone preferred
Risk Level
Low-Medium
Low preferred
Liquefaction
Medium
Low preferred
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Seismic Zone Zone II II preferred
Info
Risk Level Low-Medium Low preferred
Info
PGA (475yr) 0.0155g Lower preferred
Info
💡 What does this mean for you?Lower seismic hazard reduces structural and insurance risk exposure.

🌡️ Land Surface Temp

Final Score: 65.4/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Land Surface Temp?Land Surface Temperature reflects heat-island intensity from satellite thermal bands.
LST Mean
28.7°C
Lower better
LST Min
0.1°C
Context
LST Max
40.2°C
Lower better
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
LST Mean 28.7°C 20°C best / 45°C worst
Weighted by formula
LST Score 65.4 0-100
Computed
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
LST Mean (°C) 28.8 28.6 28.7
LST Min (°C) -0.1 0.3 0.1
LST Max (°C) 39.9 40.4 40.2
LST Score 65.0 65.7 65.4
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher heat exposure affects comfort, cooling load and health risk.

🏗️ Built-up Density

Final Score: 76.1/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Built-up Density?Built-up density measures extent of developed surface versus open space.
Built-up %
23.9%
Lower better
Open Space %
76.1%
Higher better
Built-up Score
76.1
0-100
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Built-up % 23.9% Inverse scoring
Score = 100 - builtup%
Open Space % 76.1% Context
Info
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Built-up % 27.8% 19.9% 23.9%
Open Space % 72.2% 80.1% 76.1%
Built-up Score 72.2 80.1 76.1
💡 What does this mean for you?Very high built-up often raises heat and runoff while reducing open environmental buffers.

💡 Night-time Lights

Final Score: 42.2/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Night-time Lights?Nighttime lights are a proxy for economic activity and electrification intensity.
Avg Radiance
21.09
Higher better
Max Radiance
33.54
Context
NTL Score
42.2
0-100
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Avg Radiance 21.09 Scaled to 50
Score = min(100, avg/50*100)
NTL Score 42.2 0-100
Computed
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Avg Radiance 24.14 18.04 21.09
Max Radiance 38.09 28.99 33.54
NTL Score 48.3 36.1 42.2
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher radiance often indicates stronger urban activity but can correlate with light pollution.

🏞️ Water Bodies

Final Score: 100.0/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Water Bodies?Water-bodies score reflects permanent and seasonal water presence in the analysis radius.
Permanent Water
38.49%
Higher generally better
Seasonal Water
94.96%
Context
Water Score
100.0
0-100
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Permanent Water % 38.49% 70% weight
Scaled against 10%
Seasonal Water % 94.96% 30% weight
Scaled against 20%
Water Score 100.0 0-100
Computed
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Permanent Water % 23.57% 53.40% 38.49%
Seasonal Water % 95.19% 94.73% 94.96%
Water Score 100.0 100.0 100.0
💡 What does this mean for you?Water presence can support cooling, recharge and ecological quality.

👥 Population Density

Final Score: 90.4/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Population Density?Population density indicates urban crowding pressure around the area.
Population
27,193
Estimated residents
Density/km²
1,927.8
Lower better for this score
Score
90.4
0-100
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Density/km² 1,927.8 Inverse scale up to 20,000
Lower -> higher score
Score 90.4 0-100
Computed
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Population Total 6,829 47,556 27,193
Density / km² 2,173.6 1,682.0 1,927.8
Pop Density Score 89.1 91.6 90.4
💡 What does this mean for you?Extremely high density can increase pressure on services and mobility.

⛲ Groundwater

Final Score: 63.9/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Groundwater?Groundwater score combines moisture, recharge, drought and trend indicators.
Soil Moisture
135.019
Higher better
Recharge
2.16
Higher better
PDSI
3.10
Higher better
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Soil Moisture 135.019 30% weight
Scaled
Recharge 2.16 25% weight
Scaled
PDSI 3.10 20% weight
Scaled
SM Trend 0.0000 15% weight
Scaled
Precipitation 1,856.20 10% weight
Scaled
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Soil Moisture 135.198 134.841 135.019
Recharge Estimate 2.46 1.85 2.16
PDSI 3.10 3.10 3.10
Groundwater Score 64.0 63.9 63.9
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher score suggests better long-term aquifer and moisture support conditions.

🌧️ Waterlogging

↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Waterlogging?Waterlogging combines topography, imperviousness and wetness indices across nearby grid cells.
Grid Count
213
Sampled cells
Avg Susceptibility
49.3
Lower is safer
High Risk Grids
94
High / Very High
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTargetStatus
Avg Susceptibility 49.3 < 40
Concern
Avg Slope 2.43° > 1°
Good
Avg Impervious 10.7% < 70%
Good
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher susceptibility and low slope increase monsoon water stagnation probability.

🚶 Walkability & Safety

↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Walkability & Safety?OSM amenity metrics reflect pedestrian, safety and urban accessibility infrastructure.
Footpaths
0
Higher better
Street Lamps
0
Higher better
Police/Fire Access
0
Presence
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Footpaths (500m) 0 ≥ 3
Concern
Sidewalk Roads (1km) 0 ≥ 5
Concern
Nearest Police Station — m ≤ 2000m
Context
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher OSM accessibility/safety features generally improve everyday livability.

⚠️ Risk Factors

↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Risk Factors?Nearby hazards and sensitive risk points mapped around this area.
Total Risks
4
Mapped points
Scoring Breakdown
CategoryRiskDistance / SeverityMeaning
Infrastructure Water Supply 1-2 hrs/day in Summer 0 m / High Municipal water supply drops to 1-2 hours during peak summer
Accessibility Limited Bus Connectivity 0 m / Medium Only one city bus route, frequency >45 minutes
Environmental Construction Debris Dumping 600 m / Medium Builders using vacant land for construction waste dumping
Future_threats Planned Industrial Park Nearby 3000 m / Medium State Govt approved industrial park within 3km radius
💡 What does this mean for you?Closer and severe risks can affect insurance, resale and safety comfort.

🌬️ Air Quality: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

💧 Water Quality: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🧹 Sanitation: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🛣️ Infrastructure: Infrastructure Score Formula

Formula: Composite weighted model from GHSL/ESA/VIIRS/Terrain features
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Urbanization index88.8620%SMOD
Built-up balance23.9%15%Best in moderate band
NTL stability68.0%15%Power/activity consistency
Avg building height2.53 m10%Vertical infra proxy
Impervious %22.6%10%Moderate is optimal
Radiance20.1810%Development proxy
Slope0.10°10%Flatter is better
Green support13.7%10%Tree + grass contribution
This is the same weighted structure used in Livability Infrastructure model.
Final: 60.66 / 100

🏥 Amenities: Amenity Score Breakdown

Formula: Each amenity category is capped at 100, final score is averaged across categories
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Hospitals 500m2 * 33Cap 100Health access
Schools 1km5 * 20Cap 100Education access
Markets 1km9 * 33Cap 100Daily needs
Parks 500m1 * 33Cap 100Open space
Transit 1km0 * 50Cap 100Mobility
Category multipliers mirror the Livability snapshot logic.
Final: Final from amenity_scores table

🌳 Green Cover: Green Score Formula

Formula: Score = (NDVI*40%) + (Vegetation*30%) + (Dense Green*20%) + (Parks*10%)
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
NDVI component0.201 => 40.240%16.1
Vegetation component28.6% => 28.630%8.6
Dense green component13.4% => 26.920%5.4
Parks component1 => 33.010%3.3
This matches the Livability GreenCover model weighting logic.
Final: 33.33 / 100

🔊 Noise: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🌊 Flood Risk: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🏚️ Earthquake Risk: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🌡️ Land Surface Temp: LST Score Formula

Formula: Score = ((45 - LST Mean) / 25) * 100, clipped to [0,100]
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
LST Mean28.66 °CReference20°C best, 45°C worst
Lower land surface temperature means better livability.
Final: 65.36 / 100

🏗️ Built-up Density: Built-up Score Formula

Formula: Score = 100 - Built-up %
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Built-up %23.9%InverseLower is better
Dense concrete surfaces reduce infiltration and increase heat islands.
Final: 76.13 / 100

💡 Night-time Lights: Night-time Lights Formula

Formula: Score = min(100, (Avg Radiance / 50) * 100)
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Avg Radiance21.09Scale 0-50Higher indicates activity
Higher night radiance generally tracks electrification and economic intensity.
Final: 42.18 / 100

🏞️ Water Bodies: Water Bodies Score Formula

Formula: Score = (Permanent Water Score * 70%) + (Seasonal Water Score * 30%)
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Permanent water38.49%70%Scaled against 10% benchmark
Seasonal water94.96%30%Scaled against 20% benchmark
Permanent water has higher score weight than seasonal water.
Final: 100.00 / 100

👥 Population Density: Population Density Formula

Formula: Score = ((20000 - density_per_km²) / 20000) * 100, clipped to [0,100]
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Density1,927.8 /km²Inverse scaleLower density -> higher score
This follows the Livability PopulationDensity model.
Final: 90.36 / 100

⛲ Groundwater: Groundwater Score Formula

Formula: Weighted: Soil Moisture 30% + Recharge 25% + PDSI 20% + Trend 15% + Precipitation 10%
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Soil moisture135.01930%Scaled to 0-200
Recharge estimate2.1625%Scaled -200 to +400
PDSI3.1020%Scaled -4 to +4
SM trend0.000015%Scaled -50 to +50
Precipitation1,856.2010%Scaled 800 to 1800
Exactly reused from Livability Groundwater model logic.
Final: 63.92 / 100

🌧️ Waterlogging: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🚶 Walkability & Safety: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

⚠️ Risk Factors: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

View full livability report for Saddu →

Compliance Status

RERA registration, filings, and compliance flags based on public CG-RERA records.

Compliance Status Based on public CG-RERA records
4 Passed
2 N/A
RERA Registration Active
Reg No. PCGRERA010223001598 — Status: New
Section 3 · Source · View Certificate · RERA Official Page
No RERA Orders
No complaints or orders found against this project
Sec 38–63 · Source
No Orders in Last 12 Months
Clean record — no complaints or orders filed
Source
Within Timeline
Target completion: 25 May 2027
Section 4 · Source
Quarterly Updates Not Available
No compliance snapshot data on record
Section 11 · Source
Annual Audit Not Available
No compliance snapshot data on record
Section 4(2)(l)(D) · Source
Each check is based on publicly available CG-RERA portal data as of May 2026. How this works →
Other Projects by Same Promoter (2)
ProjectRERA No.StatusDistrictType
galaxy greens PCGRERA261220001172 New Raipur Residential Plotted Development
GALAXY PREMIUM PCGRERA140519000975 Ongoing Raipur Plotted Development

Details

Registration, professional team, bank, promoters, and compliance history.

Registration Details
RERA Number
PCGRERA010223001598
Status
New
Project Type
Residential Plotted Development
Approved Date
01 Feb 2023
Original End Date
25 May 2027
EWS Category
NO
Construction Cost
₹ 14900000
Land Cost
₹ 4805000
Proposed Completion
25 May 2027
Authorised Person
Ashok Agrawal
Website
www.galaxygreenraipur.com
View on Map
Professional Team
RoleNameLicense / Membership
Statutory CA AKANCHA GUPTA 408561
Quarterly CA SANJEEB KUMAR JAIN 422298
Engineer RUCHIR GUMASTA M-147180-5
Architect HIREN S CHANIARA CA/2013/58877
Promoters
M
MAHAMAYA INFRAREALITIES PVT. LTD. Partnership Firm

Legal Orders & Cases

RERA legal orders, complaints, and case statistics filed against this project.

Legal Orders (0)
ComplaintApplicantSectionDateSourcePDF
No orders found for this project.

Location

Project address, coordinates, and nearby places.

Location Details
Address
P.H. No. 00075, KH no. 74/1, 74/9 at village Sakri, R.N.M. Raipur, Dist Raipur C.G.
District
Raipur
Tehsil
Raipur
Coordinates
21.2838877, 81.7301721 View on Map
Area Livability

Livability of Saddu Raipur

Environmental, infrastructure & amenity parameters for the area where this project is located (3.18 km from project). Each value is compared with the Raipur average.

Composite Livability Score
59.9 / 100
Grade C · Average
+1.6 vs Raipur avg (58.3)
Air Quality
95.6 Excellent
Area
96
City
89
+6.6 vs city avg
Water Quality
74.8 Good
Area
75
City
68
+6.9 vs city avg
Sanitation
49.2 Below Avg
Area
49
City
56
-6.8 vs city avg
Green Cover
33.3 Poor
Area
33
City
39
-5.2 vs city avg
Noise Level
52.3 Average
Area
52
City
58
-5.5 vs city avg
Infrastructure
60.6 Average
Area
61
City
76
-15.6 vs city avg
Amenities
78.6 Good
Area
79
City
82
-3.2 vs city avg
Flood Safety
70.0 Good
Area
70
City
38
+31.9 vs city avg
Earthquake Safety
25.0 Poor
Area
25
City
15
+10.4 vs city avg
Land Surface Temp.
65.4 Good
Area
65
City
58
+7.6 vs city avg
Built-up Density
76.1 Good
Area
76
City
35
+41.3 vs city avg
Night-light Activity
42.2 Below Avg
Area
42
City
55
-12.5 vs city avg
Water Bodies Nearby
100.0 Excellent
Area
100
City
93
+7.3 vs city avg
Population Density
90.4 Excellent
Area
90
City
68
+22.5 vs city avg
Groundwater Status
63.9 Average
Area
64
City
63
+0.5 vs city avg
View detailed livability report for Saddu
Neighborhood Intelligence

Explore nearby infrastructure around this project. Toggle categories to show/hide on the map.

Neighborhood Map 3 km radius
RERA Projects Near Extension of GAlaxy Premium 30 found within 3 km
# Project District Status Distance
1 galaxy greens Raipur New 0.23 km
2 galaxy heights (block-b) Raipur Ongoing 0.28 km
3 GALAXY PREMIUM Raipur Ongoing 0.31 km
4 AVINASH ELITE HOMES Raipur New 0.31 km
5 SHRISHTI HIGHTS Raipur New 0.43 km
6 SWARNABHOOMI PROJECT PHASE-03 Raipur New 1.02 km
7 VENUS PARK Raipur New 1.17 km
8 SPARSH LIFE CITY Raipur New 1.17 km
9 rosebey greens extention Raipur New 1.21 km
10 SPARSH LIFE CITY PREMIUM Raipur New 1.37 km
11 PMAY OF 1044 (DUS) AT KACHNA RAIPUR Raipur Ongoing 1.44 km
12 WALLFORT WOOD PHASE - I Raipur Ongoing 1.45 km
13 WALLFORT WOOD PHASE - III Raipur Ongoing 1.46 km
14 nirvana garden phase- i Raipur Ongoing 1.54 km
15 SWARNABHOOMI PROJECT PHASE-II Raipur Ongoing 1.59 km
16 WALLFORT WOOD PHASE - II Raipur Ongoing 1.59 km
17 rOSEBEY GREENS Raipur Ongoing 1.60 km
18 wallfort woods phase - 4 Raipur New 1.63 km
19 NIRVANA GARDEN PHASE-IV Raipur New 1.68 km
20 PMAY OF 754(DUS)AT KACHANA RAIPUR Raipur Ongoing 1.70 km
21 SAPPHIRE EMPERIA PHASE -2 BLOCK "B" & "C" Raipur Ongoing 1.70 km
22 SAPPHIRE GREENS PHASE -II "C" Raipur Ongoing 1.70 km
23 SAPPHIRE EMPERIA PHASE -4 BLOCK "E" Raipur Ongoing 1.70 km
24 SAPPHIRE EMPERIA PHASE -3 BLOCK "D" Raipur Ongoing 1.71 km
25 NIRVANA GARDEN PHASE - 2 Raipur Ongoing 1.71 km
26 SAPPHIRE EMPERIA PHASE -1 BLOCK "A" Raipur Ongoing 1.72 km
27 PMAY OF870 (DUS) AT KACHNA RAIPUR Raipur Ongoing 1.74 km
28 SAPPHIRE GREENS PHASE -I (L) Raipur New 1.75 km
29 SAPPHIRE GREENS PHASE -I "A" & II "A" Raipur Ongoing 1.79 km
30 NIRVANA GARDEN PHASE-3 Raipur New 1.80 km

Buyer Checklist

Documents and verifications a buyer should review before purchase.

Buyer Document Verification Checklist

Key documents a buyer should verify before purchasing in this project. Items marked Available have data on Seemankan.

11/14 verified
  • RERA Registration Certificate Available
    Confirms the project is registered with RERA CG. Verify registration number, validity dates, and project details on the RERA portal.
    RERA No: PCGRERA010223001598
    View Certificate View on RERA Portal
  • Promoter Registration Certificate Available
    Builder / colonizer company registration certificate. Confirms the promoter entity is a registered firm, company, or society.
    Preview Preview
  • Approved Building / Sanction Plan Verify Independently
    Building plan sanctioned by the local authority. Verify floor count, setbacks, and FSI compliance.
  • Layout Plan Available
    Approved layout showing plot divisions, roads, open spaces, and common areas.
    Preview
  • Title Deed / Ownership Proof Available
    Proof that the promoter legally owns the land. Verify via Sub-Registrar records.
    Preview
  • Encumbrance Certificate Available
    Confirms the property is free from legal dues, mortgages, or liens. Obtain from Sub-Registrar office.
    Preview
  • Land Use / Diversion Certificate Available
    Required if land was converted from agricultural to non-agricultural use.
    Preview
  • Architect Certificate Available
    Certification from a registered architect confirming structural plans and compliance.
    View View View +10 more
  • Structural Engineer Certificate Available
    Certification from a structural engineer confirming building safety and load-bearing capacity.
    View View View +10 more
  • CA Financial Certificate Available
    Chartered Accountant certificate on financial status, project cost estimates, and fund utilization.
    Preview View View +9 more
  • Commencement Certificate Verify Independently
    Permission to begin construction issued by the local authority after plan approval.
  • NOCs (No Objection Certificates) Available
    NOCs from fire department, environment, water supply, electricity board, and other authorities.
    View View View +8 more
  • Project Brochure / Specification Available
    Official brochure with unit types, amenities, and specifications. Compare with actual delivery.
    Preview Preview
  • RERA Compliance Orders Verify Independently
    Check if any orders, penalties, or directions have been issued against this project by RERA.
Disclaimer: This checklist is for informational purposes only. "Available" means Seemankan has a copy from the RERA portal — it does not constitute legal verification. Always verify original documents with the concerned authorities and consult a legal advisor before making a purchase decision.

Risk Zone Within 5 km

Buffer zones (water bodies, airport restrictions) and risk sites (landfills, waste processing) detected within 3 km (immediate) and 5 km (extended) of the project.

0
Risk zones (within 5 km)
3 km: 0 3–5 km: 0
0
Water bodies (river/nala/lake)
3 km: 0 3–5 km: 0
0
Landfill / waste sites
3 km: 0 3–5 km: 0
0
Airport buffer overlap
3 km: 0 3–5 km: 0
Risk Zone Map (3 km & 5 km rings) Project marker centered
All Clear

No mapped risk zones within 3 km of this project.

Reviews

Verified buyer reviews and ratings for this project.

No reviews yet. Be the first to review this project!

Login to Write a Review

You need to be signed in to submit a review for this project.

Login or Register