Home / RERA Projects / DHEBAR CITY HOMES
ONGOING Plotted Development RERA Page Project Website
GENERATE REPORT

DHEBAR CITY HOMES

Compliance Status
Partial Compliance
21.2068, 81.6256 Explore area
District
Raipur
Area
—
Promoter
(01) A. DHEBAR BUILDCON, (02) SHRI SATISH NIRMALKAR (AGENT)
Project Information
Promoter (01) A. DHEBAR BUILDCON, (02) SHRI SATISH NIRMALKAR (AGENT)
Type Plotted Development
Status Ongoing
Completion 01 Feb 2023
RERA No. PCGRERA280618000381
Registered 28 Jun 2018
Original End 31 May 2020
EWS Category NO
Construction Cost ₹ 274883000
Land Cost ₹ 41385000
Authorised Person ANWAR DHEBAR
Address VILLAGE - MATHPURENA, RAIPUR (C.G.)
At a Glance
-
Total Units
-
Units Sold
-
Unsold
3
Legal Cases
Feb 2023
Target Completion
75%
Completion
Amenities & Facilities (12)
BOUNDARY WALL
100%
CLUB HOUSE
0%
COMMUNITY BUILDINGS
0%
ENERGY MAANAGEMENT
100%
INTERNAL ROADS AND FOOTPATHS
95%
LANDSCAPING AND TREE PLANTING
85%
OPEN PARKING
80%
PLACE OF WORSHIP
0%
SECURITY SERVICE
100%
STORM WATER DRAINS
70%
STREET LIGHTING
90%
WATER CONSERVATION RAIN WATER HARVESTING
75%
Project Professionals
SANDEEP KUMAR RAJESH MISHRA
STATUTORY CA
AKSHAY JHAWAR
QUARTERLY CA
ROHAN KUMAR GUPTA
ENGINEER
KRITI NATHANI
ARCHITECT
Project Analysis

360° Project Intelligence

Comprehensive analysis across regulatory, livability, market, filing activity, and market readiness dimensions.

Regulatory
71
10 of 14 checks · Moderate Signals
Livability
57
Bhathagaon · Moderate Signals
Legal
3
3 legal order(s) · 30 nearby
Filing Activity
338
272 docs · 66 quarterly updates
Market Readiness
35
Ongoing · due Feb 2023
Area Livability

Livability of Bhathagaon

Eighteen environmental, infrastructure and amenity parameters for the nearest mapped area (Bhathagaon — 0.78 km from this project). Click any parameter for the underlying readings, thresholds and what they mean.



🏠 Livability Parameters

Latest readings for Bhathagaon. Only parameters with available data are shown below. Based on the latest readings for Bhathagaon.

C
Composite Score
57.2 /100
Average

🌬️ Air Quality

Final Score: 81.2/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Air Quality?AQI summarizes PM2.5, PM10 and gases. Lower pollution values improve public health outcomes.
AQI
97
Satisfactory
PM2.5
25.3 µg/m³
≤ 40
PM10
349.4 µg/m³
≤ 60
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
PM2.5 25.3 µg/m³ ≤ 40
Good
PM10 349.4 µg/m³ ≤ 60
Concern
NO₂ 22.9 µg/m³ ≤ 40
Good
💡 What does this mean for you?Cleaner air lowers respiratory burden and improves outdoor comfort.

💧 Water Quality

Final Score: 69.9/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Water Quality?Water quality combines chemistry, supply duration and contamination markers.
TDS
354 ppm
≤ 500
pH
7.41
6.5–8.5
Supply
5.5 hr/day
≥ 8 hr
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
TDS 354 ppm ≤ 500
Good
Fluoride 0.85 mg/L ≤ 1.0
Good
Turbidity 3.4 NTU ≤ 1
Concern
💡 What does this mean for you?Better supply quality and consistency reduces dependence on tanker/groundwater fallback.

🧹 Sanitation

Final Score: 34.4/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Sanitation?Sanitation reflects ODF status, sewage treatment and waste management regularity.
ODF
ODF
ODF++
Sewage Coverage
28%
≥ 80%
Drainage
38%
≥ 90%
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
ODF Status ODF ODF++
Info
Sewage Coverage 28% ≥ 80%
Concern
Drainage Coverage 38% ≥ 90%
Concern
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher sanitation maturity lowers disease exposure and neighborhood nuisance.

🛣️ Infrastructure

Final Score: 73.6/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Infrastructure?Infrastructure score combines land use, urbanization, built form, night lights and terrain indicators.
Built-up
52.6%
Balanced band
Tree Cover
9.6%
≥ 15%
Urbanization
89.5
Higher better
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Built-up (LULC) 52.6% 40-70%
Contextual
Impervious Surface 37.0% < 70%
Good
NDVI Mean 0.250 > 0.3
Concern
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Built-up (LULC) % 56.6% 48.5% 52.6%
Tree Cover % 4.6% 14.6% 9.6%
Urbanization Index 96.3 82.7 89.5
Infra Score 75.7 71.5 73.6
💡 What does this mean for you?Balanced built + green mix usually improves long-term livability resilience.

🏥 Amenities

Final Score: 90.8/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Amenities?Amenity score captures daily-access services in walk/short-drive radii.
Hospitals 500m
5
Target ≥1
Schools 1km
7
Target ≥3
Parks 500m
4
Target ≥1
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Hospitals (500m) 5 ≥1
Good
Schools (1km) 7 ≥3
Good
Markets (1km) 11 ≥1
Good
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher local amenity density improves convenience and walkability.

🌳 Green Cover

Final Score: 41.0/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Green Cover?NDVI and vegetation structure are measured from satellite imagery to estimate neighborhood greenery.
NDVI Mean
0.208
Greenness index
Vegetation
25.1%
% green pixels
Dense Green
11.8%
Thick canopy
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
NDVI Mean 0.208 0.5 maps to score 100
Weighted 40%
Vegetation % 25.1% Direct % (cap 100)
Weighted 30%
Dense Green % 11.8% Scaled from 50%
Weighted 20%
Parks within 500m 4 Count * 33 (cap 100)
Weighted 10%
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
NDVI Mean 0.192 0.223 0.208
Vegetation % 28.5% 21.7% 25.1%
Dense Green % 7.1% 16.5% 11.8%
Tree Canopy % 19.8% 16.4% 18.1%
Green Score 36.7 41.0 38.9
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher green metrics typically reduce heat stress and improve comfort.

🔊 Noise

Final Score: 58.6/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Noise?Noise uses measured day/night dB compared to CPCB zone limits.
Day dB
51.4
vs CPCB day limit
Night dB
48.6
vs CPCB night limit
Zone
CPCB class
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Day Noise 51.4 dB ≤ 65.0 dB
Good
Night Noise 48.6 dB ≤ 55.0 dB
Good
Nearest Highway 1,311 m Higher usually quieter
Info
💡 What does this mean for you?Chronic high noise impacts stress, sleep quality and perceived comfort.

🌊 Flood Risk

Final Score: 40.0/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Flood Risk?Flood risk combines river exposure and local waterlogging vulnerability.
Overall Risk
Medium
Lower is safer
River Risk
Medium
Lower is safer
Waterlogging
Medium
Lower is safer
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Overall Risk Medium Low preferred
Info
River Flood Risk Medium Low preferred
Info
Waterlogging Risk Medium Low preferred
Info
💡 What does this mean for you?Lower flood risk means less disruption and lower hazard exposure.

🏚️ Earthquake Risk

Final Score: 10.0/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Earthquake Risk?Earthquake profile uses seismic zone, PGA and soil/liquefaction risk factors.
Seismic Zone
Zone II
Lower risk zone preferred
Risk Level
Low
Low preferred
Liquefaction
None
Low preferred
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Seismic Zone Zone II II preferred
Info
Risk Level Low Low preferred
Info
PGA (475yr) 0.0155g Lower preferred
Info
💡 What does this mean for you?Lower seismic hazard reduces structural and insurance risk exposure.

🌡️ Land Surface Temp

Final Score: 57.9/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Land Surface Temp?Land Surface Temperature reflects heat-island intensity from satellite thermal bands.
LST Mean
30.5°C
Lower better
LST Min
23.6°C
Context
LST Max
38.4°C
Lower better
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
LST Mean 30.5°C 20°C best / 45°C worst
Weighted by formula
LST Score 57.9 0-100
Computed
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
LST Mean (°C) 30.7 30.4 30.5
LST Min (°C) 24.1 23.2 23.6
LST Max (°C) 38.5 38.3 38.4
LST Score 57.3 58.4 57.9
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher heat exposure affects comfort, cooling load and health risk.

🏗️ Built-up Density

Final Score: 47.5/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Built-up Density?Built-up density measures extent of developed surface versus open space.
Built-up %
52.6%
Lower better
Open Space %
47.5%
Higher better
Built-up Score
47.5
0-100
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Built-up % 52.6% Inverse scoring
Score = 100 - builtup%
Open Space % 47.5% Context
Info
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Built-up % 56.6% 48.5% 52.6%
Open Space % 43.4% 51.5% 47.5%
Built-up Score 43.4 51.5 47.5
💡 What does this mean for you?Very high built-up often raises heat and runoff while reducing open environmental buffers.

💡 Night-time Lights

Final Score: 42.6/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Night-time Lights?Nighttime lights are a proxy for economic activity and electrification intensity.
Avg Radiance
21.30
Higher better
Max Radiance
32.30
Context
NTL Score
42.6
0-100
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Avg Radiance 21.30 Scaled to 50
Score = min(100, avg/50*100)
NTL Score 42.6 0-100
Computed
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Avg Radiance 23.43 19.17 21.30
Max Radiance 35.15 29.45 32.30
NTL Score 46.9 38.3 42.6
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher radiance often indicates stronger urban activity but can correlate with light pollution.

🏞️ Water Bodies

Final Score: 100.0/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Water Bodies?Water-bodies score reflects permanent and seasonal water presence in the analysis radius.
Permanent Water
74.42%
Higher generally better
Seasonal Water
98.28%
Context
Water Score
100.0
0-100
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Permanent Water % 74.42% 70% weight
Scaled against 10%
Seasonal Water % 98.28% 30% weight
Scaled against 20%
Water Score 100.0 0-100
Computed
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Permanent Water % 83.49% 65.34% 74.42%
Seasonal Water % 98.64% 97.92% 98.28%
Water Score 100.0 100.0 100.0
💡 What does this mean for you?Water presence can support cooling, recharge and ecological quality.

👥 Population Density

Final Score: 78.0/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Population Density?Population density indicates urban crowding pressure around the area.
Population
70,794
Estimated residents
Density/km²
4,394.5
Lower better for this score
Score
78.0
0-100
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Density/km² 4,394.5 Inverse scale up to 20,000
Lower -> higher score
Score 78.0 0-100
Computed
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Population Total 13,364 128,224 70,794
Density / km² 4,254.0 4,535.0 4,394.5
Pop Density Score 78.7 77.3 78.0
💡 What does this mean for you?Extremely high density can increase pressure on services and mobility.

⛲ Groundwater

Final Score: 63.0/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Groundwater?Groundwater score combines moisture, recharge, drought and trend indicators.
Soil Moisture
133.016
Higher better
Recharge
0.44
Higher better
PDSI
2.88
Higher better
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Soil Moisture 133.016 30% weight
Scaled
Recharge 0.44 25% weight
Scaled
PDSI 2.88 20% weight
Scaled
SM Trend 0.0000 15% weight
Scaled
Precipitation 1,871.90 10% weight
Scaled
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Soil Moisture 133.047 132.985 133.016
Recharge Estimate 0.42 0.47 0.44
PDSI 2.91 2.84 2.88
Groundwater Score 63.1 62.9 63.0
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher score suggests better long-term aquifer and moisture support conditions.

🚶 Walkability & Safety

↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Walkability & Safety?OSM amenity metrics reflect pedestrian, safety and urban accessibility infrastructure.
Footpaths
0
Higher better
Street Lamps
0
Higher better
Police/Fire Access
0
Presence
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Footpaths (500m) 0 ≥ 3
Concern
Sidewalk Roads (1km) 0 ≥ 5
Concern
Nearest Police Station — m ≤ 2000m
Context
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher OSM accessibility/safety features generally improve everyday livability.

🌬️ Air Quality: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

💧 Water Quality: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🧹 Sanitation: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🛣️ Infrastructure: Infrastructure Score Formula

Formula: Composite weighted model from GHSL/ESA/VIIRS/Terrain features
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Urbanization index89.4920%SMOD
Built-up balance52.6%15%Best in moderate band
NTL stability71.0%15%Power/activity consistency
Avg building height5.18 m10%Vertical infra proxy
Impervious %37.0%10%Moderate is optimal
Radiance21.6510%Development proxy
Slope0.10°10%Flatter is better
Green support9.6%10%Tree + grass contribution
This is the same weighted structure used in Livability Infrastructure model.
Final: 73.62 / 100

🏥 Amenities: Amenity Score Breakdown

Formula: Each amenity category is capped at 100, final score is averaged across categories
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Hospitals 500m5 * 33Cap 100Health access
Schools 1km7 * 20Cap 100Education access
Markets 1km11 * 33Cap 100Daily needs
Parks 500m4 * 33Cap 100Open space
Transit 1km0 * 50Cap 100Mobility
Category multipliers mirror the Livability snapshot logic.
Final: Final from amenity_scores table

🌳 Green Cover: Green Score Formula

Formula: Score = (NDVI*40%) + (Vegetation*30%) + (Dense Green*20%) + (Parks*10%)
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
NDVI component0.208 => 41.640%16.6
Vegetation component25.1% => 25.130%7.5
Dense green component11.8% => 23.620%4.7
Parks component4 => 100.010%10.0
This matches the Livability GreenCover model weighting logic.
Final: 38.88 / 100

🔊 Noise: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🌊 Flood Risk: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🏚️ Earthquake Risk: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🌡️ Land Surface Temp: LST Score Formula

Formula: Score = ((45 - LST Mean) / 25) * 100, clipped to [0,100]
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
LST Mean30.53 °CReference20°C best, 45°C worst
Lower land surface temperature means better livability.
Final: 57.88 / 100

🏗️ Built-up Density: Built-up Score Formula

Formula: Score = 100 - Built-up %
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Built-up %52.6%InverseLower is better
Dense concrete surfaces reduce infiltration and increase heat islands.
Final: 47.45 / 100

💡 Night-time Lights: Night-time Lights Formula

Formula: Score = min(100, (Avg Radiance / 50) * 100)
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Avg Radiance21.30Scale 0-50Higher indicates activity
Higher night radiance generally tracks electrification and economic intensity.
Final: 42.60 / 100

🏞️ Water Bodies: Water Bodies Score Formula

Formula: Score = (Permanent Water Score * 70%) + (Seasonal Water Score * 30%)
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Permanent water74.42%70%Scaled against 10% benchmark
Seasonal water98.28%30%Scaled against 20% benchmark
Permanent water has higher score weight than seasonal water.
Final: 100.00 / 100

👥 Population Density: Population Density Formula

Formula: Score = ((20000 - density_per_km²) / 20000) * 100, clipped to [0,100]
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Density4,394.5 /km²Inverse scaleLower density -> higher score
This follows the Livability PopulationDensity model.
Final: 78.03 / 100

⛲ Groundwater: Groundwater Score Formula

Formula: Weighted: Soil Moisture 30% + Recharge 25% + PDSI 20% + Trend 15% + Precipitation 10%
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Soil moisture133.01630%Scaled to 0-200
Recharge estimate0.4425%Scaled -200 to +400
PDSI2.8820%Scaled -4 to +4
SM trend0.000015%Scaled -50 to +50
Precipitation1,871.9010%Scaled 800 to 1800
Exactly reused from Livability Groundwater model logic.
Final: 62.99 / 100

🚶 Walkability & Safety: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

View full livability report for Bhathagaon →

Compliance Status

RERA registration, filings, and compliance flags based on public CG-RERA records.

Compliance Status Based on public CG-RERA records
3 Passed
1 Issue(s)
2 N/A
RERA Registration Active
Reg No. PCGRERA280618000381 — Status: Ongoing
Section 3 · Source · RERA Official Page
No Penalty Orders
3 order(s) on record, none with penalty sections (Sec 38/39/40/59/61/63)
Sec 38–63 · Source
No Recent Orders
No orders filed in the last 12 months (older: 3)
Source
Completion Overdue
Was due 01 Feb 2023 — overdue by ~40 month(s)
Section 4 · Source
Quarterly Updates Not Available
No compliance snapshot data on record
Section 11 · Source
Annual Audit Not Available
No compliance snapshot data on record
Section 4(2)(l)(D) · Source
Each check is based on publicly available CG-RERA portal data as of May 2026. How this works →
Other Projects by Same Promoter (2)
ProjectRERA No.StatusDistrictType
lotus tower phase i PCGRERA280618000378 Ongoing Raipur Residential Development
lotus tower phase ii PCGRERA280618000377 Ongoing Raipur Residential Development

Details

Registration, professional team, bank, promoters, and compliance history.

Registration Details
RERA Number
PCGRERA280618000381
Status
Ongoing
Project Type
Plotted Development
Approved Date
28 Jun 2018
Original End Date
31 May 2020
EWS Category
NO
Construction Cost
₹ 274883000
Land Cost
₹ 41385000
Proposed Completion
01 Feb 2023
Authorised Person
ANWAR DHEBAR
View on Map
Professional Team
RoleNameLicense / Membership
Statutory CA SANDEEP KUMAR RAJESH MISHRA 444422
Quarterly CA Akshay Jhawar 440910
Engineer Rohan Kumar Gupta 702
Architect Kriti Nathani 1087/2019
Promoters
(
(01) A. DHEBAR BUILDCON, (02) SHRI SATISH NIRMALKAR (AGENT) Partnership Firm
(
(01) A. DHEBAR BUILDCON, (02) SHRI SATISH NIRMALKAR (AGENT)
A
A. DHEBAR BUILDCON, THRU-ANWAR DHEBAR
A
A. DHEBAR BUILDCON Partnership Firm
A
A. DHEBAR BUILDCON
(
(01) LOTUS TOWER, (02) ANWAR DHEBAR, (03) DILIP KUMAR LAKHWANI Partnership Firm
(
(01) LOTUS TOWER, (02) ANWAR DHEBAR, (03) DILIP KUMAR LAKHWANI

Legal Orders & Cases

RERA legal orders, complaints, and case statistics filed against this project.

3
Total Cases
0
Last 12 Months
3
Older Cases
3
PDFs Available
Legal Orders (3)
ComplaintApplicantSectionDateSourcePDF
SM-EXP-2024-02193 CG-RERA - 29 Jul 2024 This project
M-COM-2023-02042 CG-RERA - 07 Feb 2024 This project
M-COM-2019-00425 CG-RERA Section 11 09 Mar 2022 This project

Location

Project address, coordinates, and nearby places.

Location Details
Address
VILLAGE - MATHPURENA, RAIPUR (C.G.)
District
Raipur
Tehsil
Raipur
Coordinates
21.2068098, 81.6255640 View on Map
Area Livability

Livability of Bhathagaon Raipur

Environmental, infrastructure & amenity parameters for the area where this project is located (0.78 km from project). Each value is compared with the Raipur average.

Composite Livability Score
57.2 / 100
Grade C · Average
-1.1 vs Raipur avg (58.3)
Air Quality
81.2 Excellent
Area
81
City
89
-7.8 vs city avg
Water Quality
69.9 Good
Area
70
City
68
+2.0 vs city avg
Sanitation
34.4 Poor
Area
34
City
56
-21.6 vs city avg
Green Cover
41.0 Below Avg
Area
41
City
39
+2.5 vs city avg
Noise Level
58.6 Average
Area
59
City
58
+0.8 vs city avg
Infrastructure
73.6 Good
Area
74
City
76
-2.6 vs city avg
Amenities
90.8 Excellent
Area
91
City
82
+9.0 vs city avg
Flood Safety
40.0 Below Avg
Area
40
City
38
+1.9 vs city avg
Earthquake Safety
10.0 Poor
Area
10
City
15
-4.6 vs city avg
Land Surface Temp.
57.9 Average
Area
58
City
58
+0.1 vs city avg
Built-up Density
47.5 Below Avg
Area
47
City
35
+12.7 vs city avg
Night-light Activity
42.6 Below Avg
Area
43
City
55
-12.1 vs city avg
Water Bodies Nearby
100.0 Excellent
Area
100
City
93
+7.3 vs city avg
Population Density
78.0 Good
Area
78
City
68
+10.1 vs city avg
Groundwater Status
63.0 Average
Area
63
City
63
-0.4 vs city avg
View detailed livability report for Bhathagaon
Neighborhood Intelligence

Explore nearby infrastructure around this project. Toggle categories to show/hide on the map.

Neighborhood Map 3 km radius
RERA Projects Near DHEBAR CITY HOMES 30 found within 3 km
# Project District Status Distance
1 lotus tower phase ii Raipur Ongoing 0.03 km
2 lotus tower phase i Raipur Ongoing 0.03 km
3 UNIQUE PARADISE PHASE -2 EXTENSION Raipur New 0.31 km
4 RIVER COUNTY - 3 Raipur New 0.38 km
5 UNIQUE PARADISE PHASE -2 Raipur New 0.38 km
6 river county - 01 Raipur Ongoing 0.39 km
7 rIVER COUNTY (J-BLOCK) Raipur New 0.44 km
8 river county - 02 Raipur Ongoing 0.44 km
9 river county - 04 Raipur Ongoing 0.44 km
10 river county - 03 Raipur Ongoing 0.45 km
11 river county - 06 Raipur Ongoing 0.45 km
12 river county - 05 Raipur Ongoing 0.47 km
13 river county - 08 Raipur Ongoing 0.47 km
14 river county - 07 Raipur Ongoing 0.48 km
15 pmay of 224 (dus) at mathpuraina Raipur Ongoing 0.58 km
16 VIMLA VIHAR Raipur Ongoing 0.61 km
17 AVINASH NEOPOLIS PHASE-1 Raipur New 0.73 km
18 ABHINANDAN TOWER Raipur Ongoing 0.74 km
19 SHIVA RESIDENCY PHASE - A-1 Raipur Ongoing 0.79 km
20 SIMRAN CITY EXTENSION Raipur Ongoing 0.83 km
21 SHIVA RESIDENCY PHASE - III Raipur Ongoing 0.86 km
22 BAJAJ SKY HEIGHTS Raipur New 0.91 km
23 simran squre Raipur Ongoing 0.94 km
24 CENTRUM Raipur Ongoing 1.04 km
25 S. SIMRAN CITY -5, PHASE -II Raipur Ongoing 1.08 km
26 S.SIMRAN CITY-5, PHASE-I Raipur Ongoing 1.12 km
27 ANAND VIHAR Raipur Ongoing 1.17 km
28 SIMRAN GALAXY Raipur Ongoing 1.17 km
29 pragati pearl Raipur Ongoing 1.28 km
30 gt uni homes phase-2 Raipur New 1.34 km

Buyer Checklist

Documents and verifications a buyer should review before purchase.

Buyer Document Verification Checklist

Key documents a buyer should verify before purchasing in this project. Items marked Available have data on Seemankan.

11/14 verified
  • RERA Registration Certificate Available
    Confirms the project is registered with RERA CG. Verify registration number, validity dates, and project details on the RERA portal.
    RERA No: PCGRERA280618000381
    View on RERA Portal
  • Promoter Registration Certificate Available
    Builder / colonizer company registration certificate. Confirms the promoter entity is a registered firm, company, or society.
    Preview Preview
  • Approved Building / Sanction Plan Verify Independently
    Building plan sanctioned by the local authority. Verify floor count, setbacks, and FSI compliance.
  • Layout Plan Available
    Approved layout showing plot divisions, roads, open spaces, and common areas.
    Preview
  • Title Deed / Ownership Proof Available
    Proof that the promoter legally owns the land. Verify via Sub-Registrar records.
    Preview
  • Encumbrance Certificate Available
    Confirms the property is free from legal dues, mortgages, or liens. Obtain from Sub-Registrar office.
    Preview
  • Land Use / Diversion Certificate Verify Independently
    Required if land was converted from agricultural to non-agricultural use.
  • Architect Certificate Available
    Certification from a registered architect confirming structural plans and compliance.
    View View View +20 more
  • Structural Engineer Certificate Available
    Certification from a structural engineer confirming building safety and load-bearing capacity.
    View View View +20 more
  • CA Financial Certificate Available
    Chartered Accountant certificate on financial status, project cost estimates, and fund utilization.
    Preview View View +21 more
  • Commencement Certificate Verify Independently
    Permission to begin construction issued by the local authority after plan approval.
  • NOCs (No Objection Certificates) Available
    NOCs from fire department, environment, water supply, electricity board, and other authorities.
    View View View +1 more
  • Project Brochure / Specification Available
    Official brochure with unit types, amenities, and specifications. Compare with actual delivery.
    Preview Preview
  • RERA Compliance Orders Available
    Check if any orders, penalties, or directions have been issued against this project by RERA.
    3 order(s) on record — review in Legal tab
Disclaimer: This checklist is for informational purposes only. "Available" means Seemankan has a copy from the RERA portal — it does not constitute legal verification. Always verify original documents with the concerned authorities and consult a legal advisor before making a purchase decision.

Risk Zone Within 5 km

Buffer zones (water bodies, airport restrictions) and risk sites (landfills, waste processing) detected within 3 km (immediate) and 5 km (extended) of the project.

17
Risk zones (within 5 km)
3 km: 7 3–5 km: 10
17
Water bodies (river/nala/lake)
3 km: 7 3–5 km: 10
0
Landfill / waste sites
3 km: 0 3–5 km: 0
0
Airport buffer overlap
3 km: 0 3–5 km: 0
Risk Zone Map (3 km & 5 km rings) Project marker centered
Water Bodies (17)
  • Mathpurena Wetland ≤3 km
    Wetland · 75m buffer
    1.25 km
  • Birgaon Talab ≤3 km
    Tank · 50m buffer
    1.41 km
  • Gudhiyari Nala ≤3 km
    Nala · 20m buffer
    1.85 km
  • Dumartarai Reservoir ≤3 km
    Reservoir · 75m buffer
    2.47 km
  • Mandir Hasaud Talab ≤3 km
    Tank · 50m buffer
    2.56 km
  • Pandri Nala ≤3 km
    Nala · 20m buffer
    2.73 km
  • Budha Talab (Vivekananda Sarovar) ≤3 km
    Lake · 50m buffer
    2.91 km
  • Pandri Talab 3–5 km
    Tank · 50m buffer
    3.03 km

Reviews

Verified buyer reviews and ratings for this project.

No reviews yet. Be the first to review this project!

Login to Write a Review

You need to be signed in to submit a review for this project.

Login or Register