Home / RERA Projects / AVINASH TWIN CITY EXTENSION
NEW Residential Plotted Development RERA Page Project Website
GENERATE REPORT

AVINASH TWIN CITY EXTENSION

Compliance Status
Compliant
21.2609, 81.5379 Explore area
District
Durg
Area
—
Promoter
AVINASH TWIN CITY PRIVATE LIMITED
Project Information
Promoter AVINASH TWIN CITY PRIVATE LIMITED
Type Residential Plotted Development
Status New
Completion 06 Oct 2027
RERA No. PCGRERA191022001544
Registered 19 Oct 2022
Original End 06 Oct 2027
Total Units 353 · 225 sold
EWS Category NO
Construction Cost ₹ 182990000
Land Cost ₹ 366598000
Authorised Person anand singhania
Website www.avinashgroup.com/project/detail/avinash-twin-cit
Address Village:- Kumhari, Near Toll Plaza Kumhari, District - Durg (C.G.)
At a Glance
353
Total Units
225
Units Sold
128
Unsold
0
Legal Cases
Oct 2027
Target Completion
100%
Completion
Amenities & Facilities (9)
BOUNDARY WALL
100%
INTERNAL ROADS AND FOOTPATHS
100%
LANDSCAPING AND TREE PLANTING
100%
SECURITY SERVICE
100%
SEWERAGE
100%
STORM WATER DRAINS
100%
STREET LIGHTING
100%
WATER CONSERVATION RAIN WATER HARVESTING
100%
WATER SUPPLY
100%
Project Professionals
TAPAN KUMAR SHARMA
STATUTORY CA
CA SUSHANT SHRIVASTAVA
QUARTERLY CA
VISHEK BISEN
ENGINEER
AR. AKHILESH GUPTA
ARCHITECT
Project Analysis

360° Project Intelligence

Comprehensive analysis across regulatory, livability, market, filing activity, and market readiness dimensions.

Regulatory
86
12 of 14 checks · Strong Signals
Livability
60
Tatibandh · Moderate Signals
Legal
0
No legal orders on record · 14 nearby
Filing Activity
158
134 docs · 24 quarterly updates
Market Readiness
25
New · due Oct 2027
Area Livability

Livability of Tatibandh

Eighteen environmental, infrastructure and amenity parameters for the nearest mapped area (Tatibandh — 3.94 km from this project). Click any parameter for the underlying readings, thresholds and what they mean.



🏠 Livability Parameters

Latest readings for Tatibandh. Only parameters with available data are shown below. Based on the latest readings for Tatibandh.

B
Composite Score
60.0 /100
Good

🌬️ Air Quality

Final Score: 97.2/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Air Quality?AQI summarizes PM2.5, PM10 and gases. Lower pollution values improve public health outcomes.
AQI
57
Satisfactory
PM2.5
22.7 µg/m³
≤ 40
PM10
72.9 µg/m³
≤ 60
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
PM2.5 22.7 µg/m³ ≤ 40
Good
PM10 72.9 µg/m³ ≤ 60
Concern
NO₂ 30.4 µg/m³ ≤ 40
Good
💡 What does this mean for you?Cleaner air lowers respiratory burden and improves outdoor comfort.

💧 Water Quality

Final Score: 76.3/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Water Quality?Water quality combines chemistry, supply duration and contamination markers.
TDS
366 ppm
≤ 500
pH
7.76
6.5–8.5
Supply
7.2 hr/day
≥ 8 hr
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
TDS 366 ppm ≤ 500
Good
Fluoride 0.79 mg/L ≤ 1.0
Good
Turbidity 5.0 NTU ≤ 1
Concern
💡 What does this mean for you?Better supply quality and consistency reduces dependence on tanker/groundwater fallback.

🧹 Sanitation

Final Score: 67.3/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Sanitation?Sanitation reflects ODF status, sewage treatment and waste management regularity.
ODF
ODF+
ODF++
Sewage Coverage
55%
≥ 80%
Drainage
65%
≥ 90%
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
ODF Status ODF+ ODF++
Info
Sewage Coverage 55% ≥ 80%
Concern
Drainage Coverage 65% ≥ 90%
Concern
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher sanitation maturity lowers disease exposure and neighborhood nuisance.

🛣️ Infrastructure

Final Score: 70.2/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Infrastructure?Infrastructure score combines land use, urbanization, built form, night lights and terrain indicators.
Built-up
51.6%
Balanced band
Tree Cover
12.1%
≥ 15%
Urbanization
91.8
Higher better
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Built-up (LULC) 51.6% 40-70%
Contextual
Impervious Surface 40.9% < 70%
Good
NDVI Mean 0.230 > 0.3
Concern
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Built-up (LULC) % 70.2% 33.0% 51.6%
Tree Cover % 6.5% 17.7% 12.1%
Urbanization Index 100.0 83.5 91.8
Infra Score 75.2 65.2 74.7
💡 What does this mean for you?Balanced built + green mix usually improves long-term livability resilience.

🏥 Amenities

Final Score: 100.0/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Amenities?Amenity score captures daily-access services in walk/short-drive radii.
Hospitals 500m
5
Target ≥1
Schools 1km
5
Target ≥3
Parks 500m
8
Target ≥1
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Hospitals (500m) 5 ≥1
Good
Schools (1km) 5 ≥3
Good
Markets (1km) 5 ≥1
Good
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher local amenity density improves convenience and walkability.

🌳 Green Cover

Final Score: 31.9/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Green Cover?NDVI and vegetation structure are measured from satellite imagery to estimate neighborhood greenery.
NDVI Mean
0.132
Greenness index
Vegetation
15.0%
% green pixels
Dense Green
5.8%
Thick canopy
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
NDVI Mean 0.132 0.5 maps to score 100
Weighted 40%
Vegetation % 15.0% Direct % (cap 100)
Weighted 30%
Dense Green % 5.8% Scaled from 50%
Weighted 20%
Parks within 500m 8 Count * 33 (cap 100)
Weighted 10%
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
NDVI Mean 0.104 0.159 0.132
Vegetation % 8.3% 21.6% 15.0%
Dense Green % 5.1% 6.6% 5.8%
Tree Canopy % 7.1% 10.2% 8.7%
Green Score 22.8 31.9 27.4
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher green metrics typically reduce heat stress and improve comfort.

🔊 Noise

Final Score: 70.0/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Noise?Noise uses measured day/night dB compared to CPCB zone limits.
Day dB
55.3
vs CPCB day limit
Night dB
50.3
vs CPCB night limit
Zone
commercial
CPCB class
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Day Noise 55.3 dB ≤ 65.0 dB
Good
Night Noise 50.3 dB ≤ 55.0 dB
Good
Nearest Highway 1,001 m Higher usually quieter
Info
💡 What does this mean for you?Chronic high noise impacts stress, sleep quality and perceived comfort.

🌊 Flood Risk

Final Score: 17.5/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Flood Risk?Flood risk combines river exposure and local waterlogging vulnerability.
Overall Risk
Low-Medium
Lower is safer
River Risk
Low-Medium
Lower is safer
Waterlogging
Low
Lower is safer
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Overall Risk Low-Medium Low preferred
Info
River Flood Risk Low-Medium Low preferred
Info
Waterlogging Risk Low Low preferred
Info
💡 What does this mean for you?Lower flood risk means less disruption and lower hazard exposure.

🏚️ Earthquake Risk

Final Score: 10.0/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Earthquake Risk?Earthquake profile uses seismic zone, PGA and soil/liquefaction risk factors.
Seismic Zone
Zone II
Lower risk zone preferred
Risk Level
Low
Low preferred
Liquefaction
None
Low preferred
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Seismic Zone Zone II II preferred
Info
Risk Level Low Low preferred
Info
PGA (475yr) 0.0155g Lower preferred
Info
💡 What does this mean for you?Lower seismic hazard reduces structural and insurance risk exposure.

🌡️ Land Surface Temp

Final Score: 55.2/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Land Surface Temp?Land Surface Temperature reflects heat-island intensity from satellite thermal bands.
LST Mean
31.2°C
Lower better
LST Min
20.7°C
Context
LST Max
41.5°C
Lower better
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
LST Mean 31.2°C 20°C best / 45°C worst
Weighted by formula
LST Score 55.2 0-100
Computed
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
LST Mean (°C) 31.7 30.7 31.2
LST Min (°C) 22.4 19.0 20.7
LST Max (°C) 42.1 40.8 41.5
LST Score 53.2 57.2 55.2
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher heat exposure affects comfort, cooling load and health risk.

🏗️ Built-up Density

Final Score: 48.4/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Built-up Density?Built-up density measures extent of developed surface versus open space.
Built-up %
51.6%
Lower better
Open Space %
48.4%
Higher better
Built-up Score
48.4
0-100
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Built-up % 51.6% Inverse scoring
Score = 100 - builtup%
Open Space % 48.4% Context
Info
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Built-up % 70.2% 33.0% 51.6%
Open Space % 29.9% 67.0% 48.4%
Built-up Score 29.9 67.0 48.4
💡 What does this mean for you?Very high built-up often raises heat and runoff while reducing open environmental buffers.

💡 Night-time Lights

Final Score: 39.6/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Night-time Lights?Nighttime lights are a proxy for economic activity and electrification intensity.
Avg Radiance
19.78
Higher better
Max Radiance
31.20
Context
NTL Score
39.6
0-100
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Avg Radiance 19.78 Scaled to 50
Score = min(100, avg/50*100)
NTL Score 39.6 0-100
Computed
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Avg Radiance 24.44 15.13 19.78
Max Radiance 39.05 23.35 31.20
NTL Score 48.9 30.3 39.6
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher radiance often indicates stronger urban activity but can correlate with light pollution.

🏞️ Water Bodies

Final Score: 100.0/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Water Bodies?Water-bodies score reflects permanent and seasonal water presence in the analysis radius.
Permanent Water
40.66%
Higher generally better
Seasonal Water
94.68%
Context
Water Score
100.0
0-100
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Permanent Water % 40.66% 70% weight
Scaled against 10%
Seasonal Water % 94.68% 30% weight
Scaled against 20%
Water Score 100.0 0-100
Computed
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Permanent Water % 34.27% 47.05% 40.66%
Seasonal Water % 94.41% 94.94% 94.68%
Water Score 100.0 100.0 100.0
💡 What does this mean for you?Water presence can support cooling, recharge and ecological quality.

👥 Population Density

Final Score: 76.2/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Population Density?Population density indicates urban crowding pressure around the area.
Population
58,099
Estimated residents
Density/km²
4,759.4
Lower better for this score
Score
76.2
0-100
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Density/km² 4,759.4 Inverse scale up to 20,000
Lower -> higher score
Score 76.2 0-100
Computed
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Population Total 19,117 97,081 58,099
Density / km² 6,085.3 3,433.5 4,759.4
Pop Density Score 69.6 82.8 76.2
💡 What does this mean for you?Extremely high density can increase pressure on services and mobility.

⛲ Groundwater

Final Score: 63.2/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Groundwater?Groundwater score combines moisture, recharge, drought and trend indicators.
Soil Moisture
130.254
Higher better
Recharge
3.44
Higher better
PDSI
3.07
Higher better
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Soil Moisture 130.254 30% weight
Scaled
Recharge 3.44 25% weight
Scaled
PDSI 3.07 20% weight
Scaled
SM Trend 0.0000 15% weight
Scaled
Precipitation 1,873.70 10% weight
Scaled
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Soil Moisture 130.210 130.297 130.254
Recharge Estimate 3.55 3.33 3.44
PDSI 3.08 3.06 3.07
Groundwater Score 63.2 63.2 63.2
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher score suggests better long-term aquifer and moisture support conditions.

🌧️ Waterlogging

↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Waterlogging?Waterlogging combines topography, imperviousness and wetness indices across nearby grid cells.
Grid Count
418
Sampled cells
Avg Susceptibility
48.2
Lower is safer
High Risk Grids
163
High / Very High
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTargetStatus
Avg Susceptibility 48.2 < 40
Concern
Avg Slope 2.84° > 1°
Good
Avg Impervious 9.0% < 70%
Good
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher susceptibility and low slope increase monsoon water stagnation probability.

🚶 Walkability & Safety

↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Walkability & Safety?OSM amenity metrics reflect pedestrian, safety and urban accessibility infrastructure.
Footpaths
1
Higher better
Street Lamps
0
Higher better
Police/Fire Access
1
Presence
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Footpaths (500m) 1 ≥ 3
Concern
Sidewalk Roads (1km) 0 ≥ 5
Concern
Nearest Police Station 1,700 m ≤ 2000m
Context
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher OSM accessibility/safety features generally improve everyday livability.

⚠️ Risk Factors

↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Risk Factors?Nearby hazards and sensitive risk points mapped around this area.
Total Risks
8
Mapped points
Scoring Breakdown
CategoryRiskDistance / SeverityMeaning
Future_threats NH-6 Bypass Widening Zone 200 m / Critical Properties within 30m of road face acquisition for NH widening
Water_drainage Kharun River Flood Plain 500 m / High Area within flood plain of Kharun river, history of 2019 flooding
Air_pollution Brick Kilns - Tatibandh South 1500 m / High Active brick kilns 1.5km south causing seasonal air pollution
Environmental Old Tatibandh Dump Yard 2000 m / High Decommissioned but not remediated landfill site, 2km from colony
Infrastructure Unlit Patches - Tatibandh Bypass Road 300 m / Medium Stretches of bypass road without streetlights
Environmental Industrial Estate Effluent 800 m / Medium Small-scale industries discharging partially treated effluent
Accessibility No Bus Route Coverage 2000 m / Medium Nearest city bus stop 2+ km away from interior colony
Safety_social Cattle Colony Near Bypass 1000 m / Low Large unauthorized cattle colony on bypass road approach
💡 What does this mean for you?Closer and severe risks can affect insurance, resale and safety comfort.

🌬️ Air Quality: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

💧 Water Quality: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🧹 Sanitation: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🛣️ Infrastructure: Infrastructure Score Formula

Formula: Composite weighted model from GHSL/ESA/VIIRS/Terrain features
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Urbanization index91.7620%SMOD
Built-up balance51.6%15%Best in moderate band
NTL stability65.0%15%Power/activity consistency
Avg building height5.99 m10%Vertical infra proxy
Impervious %40.9%10%Moderate is optimal
Radiance19.4510%Development proxy
Slope0.10°10%Flatter is better
Green support12.1%10%Tree + grass contribution
This is the same weighted structure used in Livability Infrastructure model.
Final: 74.72 / 100

🏥 Amenities: Amenity Score Breakdown

Formula: Each amenity category is capped at 100, final score is averaged across categories
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Hospitals 500m5 * 33Cap 100Health access
Schools 1km5 * 20Cap 100Education access
Markets 1km5 * 33Cap 100Daily needs
Parks 500m8 * 33Cap 100Open space
Transit 1km3 * 50Cap 100Mobility
Category multipliers mirror the Livability snapshot logic.
Final: Final from amenity_scores table

🌳 Green Cover: Green Score Formula

Formula: Score = (NDVI*40%) + (Vegetation*30%) + (Dense Green*20%) + (Parks*10%)
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
NDVI component0.132 => 26.440%10.6
Vegetation component15.0% => 15.030%4.5
Dense green component5.8% => 11.720%2.3
Parks component8 => 100.010%10.0
This matches the Livability GreenCover model weighting logic.
Final: 27.38 / 100

🔊 Noise: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🌊 Flood Risk: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🏚️ Earthquake Risk: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🌡️ Land Surface Temp: LST Score Formula

Formula: Score = ((45 - LST Mean) / 25) * 100, clipped to [0,100]
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
LST Mean31.21 °CReference20°C best, 45°C worst
Lower land surface temperature means better livability.
Final: 55.16 / 100

🏗️ Built-up Density: Built-up Score Formula

Formula: Score = 100 - Built-up %
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Built-up %51.6%InverseLower is better
Dense concrete surfaces reduce infiltration and increase heat islands.
Final: 48.42 / 100

💡 Night-time Lights: Night-time Lights Formula

Formula: Score = min(100, (Avg Radiance / 50) * 100)
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Avg Radiance19.78Scale 0-50Higher indicates activity
Higher night radiance generally tracks electrification and economic intensity.
Final: 39.57 / 100

🏞️ Water Bodies: Water Bodies Score Formula

Formula: Score = (Permanent Water Score * 70%) + (Seasonal Water Score * 30%)
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Permanent water40.66%70%Scaled against 10% benchmark
Seasonal water94.68%30%Scaled against 20% benchmark
Permanent water has higher score weight than seasonal water.
Final: 100.00 / 100

👥 Population Density: Population Density Formula

Formula: Score = ((20000 - density_per_km²) / 20000) * 100, clipped to [0,100]
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Density4,759.4 /km²Inverse scaleLower density -> higher score
This follows the Livability PopulationDensity model.
Final: 76.20 / 100

⛲ Groundwater: Groundwater Score Formula

Formula: Weighted: Soil Moisture 30% + Recharge 25% + PDSI 20% + Trend 15% + Precipitation 10%
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Soil moisture130.25430%Scaled to 0-200
Recharge estimate3.4425%Scaled -200 to +400
PDSI3.0720%Scaled -4 to +4
SM trend0.000015%Scaled -50 to +50
Precipitation1,873.7010%Scaled 800 to 1800
Exactly reused from Livability Groundwater model logic.
Final: 63.19 / 100

🌧️ Waterlogging: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🚶 Walkability & Safety: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

⚠️ Risk Factors: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

View full livability report for Tatibandh →

Compliance Status

RERA registration, filings, and compliance flags based on public CG-RERA records.

Compliance Status Based on public CG-RERA records
4 Passed
2 N/A
RERA Registration Active
Reg No. PCGRERA191022001544 — Status: New
Section 3 · Source · View Certificate · RERA Official Page
No RERA Orders
No complaints or orders found against this project
Sec 38–63 · Source
No Orders in Last 12 Months
Clean record — no complaints or orders filed
Source
Within Timeline
Target completion: 06 Oct 2027
Section 4 · Source
Quarterly Updates Not Available
No compliance snapshot data on record
Section 11 · Source
Annual Audit Not Available
No compliance snapshot data on record
Section 4(2)(l)(D) · Source
Each check is based on publicly available CG-RERA portal data as of May 2026. How this works →
Other Projects by Same Promoter (7)
ProjectRERA No.StatusDistrictType
avinash twin city PCGRERA250619000998 New Durg Plotted Development
AVINASH TWIN CITY - PHASE 1 EXTENSION III PCGRERA201125001994 New Durg Residential Plotted Development
AVINASH TWIN CITY - PHASE 2 EXTENSION II PCGRERA201125001993 New Durg Residential Plotted Development
avinash twin city -2 PCGRERA090222001334 New Durg Residential Plotted Development
AVINASH TWIN CITY COMMERCIAL - 1 PCGRERA241025001982 New Durg Commercial Development
avinash twin city phase-2 extension PCGRERA240424001765 New Durg Residential Plotted Development
avinash twin city phase-I extension-II PCGRERA010524001771 New Durg Residential Plotted Development

Details

Registration, professional team, bank, promoters, and compliance history.

Registration Details
RERA Number
PCGRERA191022001544
Status
New
Project Type
Residential Plotted Development
Approved Date
19 Oct 2022
Original End Date
06 Oct 2027
EWS Category
NO
Construction Cost
₹ 182990000
Land Cost
₹ 366598000
Proposed Completion
06 Oct 2027
Authorised Person
anand singhania
Website
www.avinashgroup.com/project/detail/avinash-twin-cit
View on Map
Professional Team
RoleNameLicense / Membership
Statutory CA TAPAN KUMAR SHARMA 302107
Quarterly CA CA SUSHANT SHRIVASTAVA 427630
Engineer VISHEK BISEN 1119
Architect Ar. AKHILESH GUPTA CA/2009/46770
Promoters
A
AVINASH TWIN CITY PRIVATE LIMITED Company

Legal Orders & Cases

RERA legal orders, complaints, and case statistics filed against this project.

Legal Orders (0)
ComplaintApplicantSectionDateSourcePDF
No orders found for this project.

Location

Project address, coordinates, and nearby places.

Location Details
Address
Village:- Kumhari, Near Toll Plaza Kumhari, District - Durg (C.G.)
District
Durg
Tehsil
Dhamdha
Coordinates
21.2609054, 81.5378926 View on Map
Area Livability

Livability of Tatibandh Raipur

Environmental, infrastructure & amenity parameters for the area where this project is located (3.94 km from project). Each value is compared with the Raipur average.

Composite Livability Score
60.0 / 100
Grade B · Average
+1.7 vs Raipur avg (58.3)
Air Quality
97.2 Excellent
Area
97
City
89
+8.2 vs city avg
Water Quality
76.3 Good
Area
76
City
68
+8.3 vs city avg
Sanitation
67.3 Good
Area
67
City
56
+11.3 vs city avg
Green Cover
31.9 Poor
Area
32
City
39
-6.6 vs city avg
Noise Level
70.0 Good
Area
70
City
58
+12.2 vs city avg
Infrastructure
70.2 Good
Area
70
City
76
-6.0 vs city avg
Amenities
100.0 Excellent
Area
100
City
82
+18.2 vs city avg
Flood Safety
17.5 Poor
Area
18
City
38
-20.6 vs city avg
Earthquake Safety
10.0 Poor
Area
10
City
15
-4.6 vs city avg
Land Surface Temp.
55.2 Average
Area
55
City
58
-2.6 vs city avg
Built-up Density
48.4 Below Avg
Area
48
City
35
+13.6 vs city avg
Night-light Activity
39.6 Below Avg
Area
40
City
55
-15.1 vs city avg
Water Bodies Nearby
100.0 Excellent
Area
100
City
93
+7.3 vs city avg
Population Density
76.2 Good
Area
76
City
68
+8.3 vs city avg
Groundwater Status
63.2 Average
Area
63
City
63
-0.2 vs city avg
View detailed livability report for Tatibandh
Neighborhood Intelligence

Explore nearby infrastructure around this project. Toggle categories to show/hide on the map.

Neighborhood Map 3 km radius
RERA Projects Near avinash twin city extension 14 found within 3 km
# Project District Status Distance
1 avinash twin city phase-2 extension Durg New 0.24 km
2 avinash twin city -2 Durg New 0.34 km
3 avinash twin city Durg New 0.42 km
4 AVINASH TWIN CITY COMMERCIAL - 1 Durg New 0.49 km
5 AVINASH TWIN CITY - PHASE 2 EXTENSION II Durg New 0.51 km
6 AVINASH TWIN CITY - PHASE 1 EXTENSION III Durg New 0.52 km
7 avinash twin city phase-I extension-II Durg New 0.61 km
8 ralas royal park Durg Ongoing 1.45 km
9 BALAJI KEWALYA PARK "3" Durg New 2.33 km
10 BALAJI KEWALYA PARK "I" Durg New 2.40 km
11 KEWALYA PARK Durg Ongoing 2.42 km
12 balaji kewalya park -2 Durg New 2.45 km
13 Lotus city phase- 05 Durg New 2.68 km
14 HARSHIT PLATINUM GREEN Durg New 2.71 km

Buyer Checklist

Documents and verifications a buyer should review before purchase.

Buyer Document Verification Checklist

Key documents a buyer should verify before purchasing in this project. Items marked Available have data on Seemankan.

11/14 verified
  • RERA Registration Certificate Available
    Confirms the project is registered with RERA CG. Verify registration number, validity dates, and project details on the RERA portal.
    RERA No: PCGRERA191022001544
    View Certificate View on RERA Portal
  • Promoter Registration Certificate Available
    Builder / colonizer company registration certificate. Confirms the promoter entity is a registered firm, company, or society.
    Preview Preview
  • Approved Building / Sanction Plan Verify Independently
    Building plan sanctioned by the local authority. Verify floor count, setbacks, and FSI compliance.
  • Layout Plan Available
    Approved layout showing plot divisions, roads, open spaces, and common areas.
    Preview
  • Title Deed / Ownership Proof Available
    Proof that the promoter legally owns the land. Verify via Sub-Registrar records.
    Preview
  • Encumbrance Certificate Available
    Confirms the property is free from legal dues, mortgages, or liens. Obtain from Sub-Registrar office.
    Preview
  • Land Use / Diversion Certificate Available
    Required if land was converted from agricultural to non-agricultural use.
    Preview
  • Architect Certificate Available
    Certification from a registered architect confirming structural plans and compliance.
    View View View +4 more
  • Structural Engineer Certificate Available
    Certification from a structural engineer confirming building safety and load-bearing capacity.
    View View View +4 more
  • CA Financial Certificate Available
    Chartered Accountant certificate on financial status, project cost estimates, and fund utilization.
    Preview View View +7 more
  • Commencement Certificate Available
    Permission to begin construction issued by the local authority after plan approval.
    Download Download Download +1 more
  • NOCs (No Objection Certificates) Verify Independently
    NOCs from fire department, environment, water supply, electricity board, and other authorities.
  • Project Brochure / Specification Available
    Official brochure with unit types, amenities, and specifications. Compare with actual delivery.
    View View View +7 more
  • RERA Compliance Orders Verify Independently
    Check if any orders, penalties, or directions have been issued against this project by RERA.
Disclaimer: This checklist is for informational purposes only. "Available" means Seemankan has a copy from the RERA portal — it does not constitute legal verification. Always verify original documents with the concerned authorities and consult a legal advisor before making a purchase decision.

Risk Zone Within 5 km

Buffer zones (water bodies, airport restrictions) and risk sites (landfills, waste processing) detected within 3 km (immediate) and 5 km (extended) of the project.

6
Risk zones (within 5 km)
3 km: 3 3–5 km: 3
1
Water bodies (river/nala/lake)
3 km: 1 3–5 km: 0
5
Landfill / waste sites
3 km: 2 3–5 km: 3
0
Airport buffer overlap
3 km: 0 3–5 km: 0
Risk Zone Map (3 km & 5 km rings) Project marker centered
Water Bodies (1)
  • Kumhari Talab ≤3 km
    Tank · 50m buffer
    2.04 km
Landfill / Waste Sites (5)
  • Sarora Composting / Bio-methanation Plant ≤3 km
    Waste processing · 200m buffer
    1.74 km
  • Sarora Trenching Ground ≤3 km
    Active landfill · 500m buffer
    2.15 km
  • Jarway Transfer Station 3–5 km
    Transfer station · 100m buffer
    3.43 km
  • Bhanpuri-Rawabhata Legacy Dump 3–5 km
    Legacy dump · 500m buffer
    3.68 km
  • Old Raipur Trenching Ground 3–5 km
    Inactive landfill · 500m buffer
    4.27 km

Reviews

Verified buyer reviews and ratings for this project.

No reviews yet. Be the first to review this project!

Login to Write a Review

You need to be signed in to submit a review for this project.

Login or Register