NEW Plotted Development RERA Page Project Website

GENERATE REPORT

ARANYA LAKE SHORE CITY

21.2747, 81.7911 Explore area

District

Raipur

Area

—

Promoter

ARANYA REAL ESTATES PVT. LTD

Project Information

Promoter ARANYA REAL ESTATES PVT. LTD

Type Plotted Development

Status New

Completion 30 Dec 2026

RERA No. PCGRERA070919001036

Registered 07 Sep 2019

Original End 31 Mar 2026

Total Units 95 · 11 sold

EWS Category NO

Construction Cost ₹ 18328000

Land Cost ₹ 11427000

Authorised Person BUDDHESHWAR VERMA

Website www.aranyarealestate.com

Address PH NO .14 VILL BAHANAKADI TAH AARANG DIST RAIPUR CG

At a Glance

Total Units

Units Sold

Unsold

Legal Cases

Dec 2026

Target Completion

25%

Completion

Amenities & Facilities (9)

BOUNDARY WALL

50%

INTERNAL ROADS AND FOOTPATHS

25%

LANDSCAPING AND TREE PLANTING

20%

SECURITY SERVICE

100%

SEWERAGE

STREET LIGHTING

TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL OF SEWERAGE AND SULLAGE WAT

WATER CONSERVATION RAIN WATER HARVESTING

WATER SUPPLY

Project Professionals

HARPREET KOUR

STATUTORY CA

AMIT MORYANI

QUARTERLY CA

AMIT SEN

ENGINEER

JAGAT LAKARA

ARCHITECT

Project Analysis

360° Project Intelligence

Comprehensive analysis across regulatory, livability, market, filing activity, and market readiness dimensions.

Regulatory

11 of 14 checks · Moderate Signals

Livability

Sector 1 · Moderate Signals

Legal

1 legal order(s) · 4 nearby

Filing Activity

351

279 docs · 72 quarterly updates

Market Readiness

New · due Dec 2026

Area Livability

Livability of Sector 1

Eighteen environmental, infrastructure and amenity parameters for the nearest mapped area (Sector 1 — 6.22 km from this project). Click any parameter for the underlying readings, thresholds and what they mean.

🏠 Livability Parameters

Latest readings for Sector 1. Only parameters with available data are shown below. Based on the latest readings for Sector 1.

Composite Score

57.9 /100

Average

🌬️ Air Quality

Final Score: 100.0/100 ↑ Higher is Better

ℹ️ What is Air Quality?AQI summarizes PM2.5, PM10 and gases. Lower pollution values improve public health outcomes.

AQI

Good

PM2.5

30.8 µg/m³

≤ 40

PM10

58.7 µg/m³

≤ 60

Scoring Breakdown

Parameter	Value	Target / Rule	Status
PM2.5	30.8 µg/m³	≤ 40	Good
PM10	58.7 µg/m³	≤ 60	Good
NO₂	8.2 µg/m³	≤ 40	Good

💡 What does this mean for you?Cleaner air lowers respiratory burden and improves outdoor comfort.

💧 Water Quality

Final Score: 88.8/100 ↑ Higher is Better

ℹ️ What is Water Quality?Water quality combines chemistry, supply duration and contamination markers.

TDS

237 ppm

≤ 500

7.75

6.5–8.5

Supply

13.2 hr/day

≥ 8 hr

Scoring Breakdown

Parameter	Value	Target / Rule	Status
TDS	237 ppm	≤ 500	Good
Fluoride	0.47 mg/L	≤ 1.0	Good
Turbidity	1.7 NTU	≤ 1	Concern

💡 What does this mean for you?Better supply quality and consistency reduces dependence on tanker/groundwater fallback.

🧹 Sanitation

Final Score: 98.0/100 ↑ Higher is Better

ℹ️ What is Sanitation?Sanitation reflects ODF status, sewage treatment and waste management regularity.

ODF

ODF++

Sewage Coverage

95%

≥ 80%

Drainage

98%

≥ 90%

Scoring Breakdown

Parameter	Value	Target / Rule	Status
ODF Status	ODF++	ODF++	Info
Sewage Coverage	95%	≥ 80%	Good
Drainage Coverage	98%	≥ 90%	Good

💡 What does this mean for you?Higher sanitation maturity lowers disease exposure and neighborhood nuisance.

🛣️ Infrastructure

Final Score: 35.3/100 ↑ Higher is Better

ℹ️ What is Infrastructure?Infrastructure score combines land use, urbanization, built form, night lights and terrain indicators.

Built-up

10.4%

Balanced band

Tree Cover

4.3%

≥ 15%

Urbanization

17.8

Higher better

Scoring Breakdown

Parameter	Value	Target / Rule	Status
Built-up (LULC)	10.4%	40-70%	Contextual
Impervious Surface	24.8%	< 70%	Good
NDVI Mean	0.260	> 0.3	Concern

Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison

Parameter	1000m	3000m	Average (Final)
Built-up (LULC) %	13.6%	7.2%	10.4%
Tree Cover %	4.6%	4.1%	4.3%
Urbanization Index	17.4	18.1	17.8
Infra Score	37.5	33.0	35.2

💡 What does this mean for you?Balanced built + green mix usually improves long-term livability resilience.

🏥 Amenities

Final Score: 47.6/100 ↑ Higher is Better

ℹ️ What is Amenities?Amenity score captures daily-access services in walk/short-drive radii.

Hospitals 500m

Target ≥1

Schools 1km

Target ≥3

Parks 500m

Target ≥1

Scoring Breakdown

Parameter	Value	Target / Rule	Status
Hospitals (500m)	0	≥1	Concern
Schools (1km)	2	≥3	Concern
Markets (1km)	1	≥1	Good

💡 What does this mean for you?Higher local amenity density improves convenience and walkability.

🌳 Green Cover

Final Score: 37.2/100 ↑ Higher is Better

ℹ️ What is Green Cover?NDVI and vegetation structure are measured from satellite imagery to estimate neighborhood greenery.

NDVI Mean

0.309

Greenness index

Vegetation

38.3%

% green pixels

Dense Green

20.2%

Thick canopy

Scoring Breakdown

Parameter	Value	Target / Rule	Status
NDVI Mean	0.309	0.5 maps to score 100	Weighted 40%
Vegetation %	38.3%	Direct % (cap 100)	Weighted 30%
Dense Green %	20.2%	Scaled from 50%	Weighted 20%
Parks within 500m	0	Count * 33 (cap 100)	Weighted 10%

Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison

Parameter	1000m	3000m	Average (Final)
NDVI Mean	0.349	0.268	0.309
Vegetation %	43.4%	33.1%	38.3%
Dense Green %	25.9%	14.5%	20.2%
Tree Canopy %	33.5%	31.7%	32.6%
Green Score	51.3	37.2	44.3

💡 What does this mean for you?Higher green metrics typically reduce heat stress and improve comfort.

🔊 Noise

Final Score: 94.4/100 ↑ Higher is Better

ℹ️ What is Noise?Noise uses measured day/night dB compared to CPCB zone limits.

Day dB

61.3

vs CPCB day limit

Night dB

56.3

vs CPCB night limit

Zone

commercial

CPCB class

Scoring Breakdown

Parameter	Value	Target / Rule	Status
Day Noise	61.3 dB	≤ 65.0 dB	Good
Night Noise	56.3 dB	≤ 55.0 dB	Concern
Nearest Highway	1,968 m	Higher usually quieter	Info

💡 What does this mean for you?Chronic high noise impacts stress, sleep quality and perceived comfort.

🌊 Flood Risk

Final Score: 10.0/100 ↑ Higher is Better

ℹ️ What is Flood Risk?Flood risk combines river exposure and local waterlogging vulnerability.

Overall Risk

Lowest

Lower is safer

River Risk

Low

Lower is safer

Waterlogging

Low

Lower is safer

Scoring Breakdown

Parameter	Value	Target / Rule	Status
Overall Risk	Lowest	Low preferred	Info
River Flood Risk	Low	Low preferred	Info
Waterlogging Risk	Low	Low preferred	Info

💡 What does this mean for you?Lower flood risk means less disruption and lower hazard exposure.

🏚️ Earthquake Risk

Final Score: 10.0/100 ↑ Higher is Better

ℹ️ What is Earthquake Risk?Earthquake profile uses seismic zone, PGA and soil/liquefaction risk factors.

Seismic Zone

Zone II

Lower risk zone preferred

Risk Level

Low

Low preferred

Liquefaction

None

Low preferred

Scoring Breakdown

Parameter	Value	Target / Rule	Status
Seismic Zone	Zone II	II preferred	Info
Risk Level	Low	Low preferred	Info
PGA (475yr)	0.0155g	Lower preferred	Info

💡 What does this mean for you?Lower seismic hazard reduces structural and insurance risk exposure.

🌡️ Land Surface Temp

Final Score: 58.0/100 ↑ Higher is Better

ℹ️ What is Land Surface Temp?Land Surface Temperature reflects heat-island intensity from satellite thermal bands.

LST Mean

30.5°C

Lower better

LST Min

13.7°C

Context

LST Max

40.0°C

Lower better

Scoring Breakdown

Parameter	Value	Target / Rule	Status
LST Mean	30.5°C	20°C best / 45°C worst	Weighted by formula
LST Score	58.0	0-100	Computed

Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison

Parameter	1000m	3000m	Average (Final)
LST Mean (°C)	31.0	30.0	30.5
LST Min (°C)	13.4	14.1	13.7
LST Max (°C)	40.1	39.9	40.0
LST Score	56.2	59.9	58.0

💡 What does this mean for you?Higher heat exposure affects comfort, cooling load and health risk.

🏗️ Built-up Density

Final Score: 89.6/100 ↑ Higher is Better

ℹ️ What is Built-up Density?Built-up density measures extent of developed surface versus open space.

Built-up %

10.4%

Lower better

Open Space %

89.6%

Higher better

Built-up Score

89.6

0-100

Scoring Breakdown

Parameter	Value	Target / Rule	Status
Built-up %	10.4%	Inverse scoring	Score = 100 - builtup%
Open Space %	89.6%	Context	Info

Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison

Parameter	1000m	3000m	Average (Final)
Built-up %	13.6%	7.2%	10.4%
Open Space %	86.4%	92.8%	89.6%
Built-up Score	86.4	92.8	89.6

💡 What does this mean for you?Very high built-up often raises heat and runoff while reducing open environmental buffers.

💡 Night-time Lights

Final Score: 19.3/100 ↑ Higher is Better

ℹ️ What is Night-time Lights?Nighttime lights are a proxy for economic activity and electrification intensity.

Avg Radiance

9.62

Higher better

Max Radiance

16.15

Context

NTL Score

19.2

0-100

Scoring Breakdown

Parameter	Value	Target / Rule	Status
Avg Radiance	9.62	Scaled to 50	Score = min(100, avg/50*100)
NTL Score	19.2	0-100	Computed

Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison

Parameter	1000m	3000m	Average (Final)
Avg Radiance	11.54	7.71	9.62
Max Radiance	20.29	12.01	16.15
NTL Score	23.1	15.4	19.2

💡 What does this mean for you?Higher radiance often indicates stronger urban activity but can correlate with light pollution.

🏞️ Water Bodies

Final Score: 100.0/100 ↑ Higher is Better

ℹ️ What is Water Bodies?Water-bodies score reflects permanent and seasonal water presence in the analysis radius.

Permanent Water

62.29%

Higher generally better

Seasonal Water

94.92%

Context

Water Score

100.0

0-100

Scoring Breakdown

Parameter	Value	Target / Rule	Status
Permanent Water %	62.29%	70% weight	Scaled against 10%
Seasonal Water %	94.92%	30% weight	Scaled against 20%
Water Score	100.0	0-100	Computed

Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison

Parameter	1000m	3000m	Average (Final)
Permanent Water %	59.14%	65.43%	62.29%
Seasonal Water %	92.90%	96.94%	94.92%
Water Score	100.0	100.0	100.0

💡 What does this mean for you?Water presence can support cooling, recharge and ecological quality.

👥 Population Density

Final Score: 95.6/100 ↑ Higher is Better

ℹ️ What is Population Density?Population density indicates urban crowding pressure around the area.

Population

13,549

Estimated residents

Density/km²

886.6

Lower better for this score

Score

95.6

0-100

Scoring Breakdown

Parameter	Value	Target / Rule	Status
Density/km²	886.6	Inverse scale up to 20,000	Lower -> higher score
Score	95.6	0-100	Computed

Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison

Parameter	1000m	3000m	Average (Final)
Population Total	2,879	24,219	13,549
Density / km²	916.5	856.6	886.6
Pop Density Score	95.4	95.7	95.6

💡 What does this mean for you?Extremely high density can increase pressure on services and mobility.

⛲ Groundwater

Final Score: 66.5/100 ↑ Higher is Better

ℹ️ What is Groundwater?Groundwater score combines moisture, recharge, drought and trend indicators.

Soil Moisture

145.402

Higher better

Recharge

1.36

Higher better

PDSI

3.53

Higher better

Scoring Breakdown

Parameter	Value	Target / Rule	Status
Soil Moisture	145.402	30% weight	Scaled
Recharge	1.36	25% weight	Scaled
PDSI	3.53	20% weight	Scaled
SM Trend	0.0000	15% weight	Scaled
Precipitation	1,847.72	10% weight	Scaled

Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison

Parameter	1000m	3000m	Average (Final)
Soil Moisture	145.408	145.396	145.402
Recharge Estimate	1.40	1.32	1.36
PDSI	3.60	3.45	3.53
Groundwater Score	66.7	66.3	66.5

💡 What does this mean for you?Higher score suggests better long-term aquifer and moisture support conditions.

🌧️ Waterlogging

↑ Higher is Better

ℹ️ What is Waterlogging?Waterlogging combines topography, imperviousness and wetness indices across nearby grid cells.

Grid Count

Sampled cells

Avg Susceptibility

45.0

Lower is safer

High Risk Grids

High / Very High

Scoring Breakdown

Parameter	Value	Target	Status
Avg Susceptibility	45.0	< 40	Concern
Avg Slope	2.68°	> 1°	Good
Avg Impervious	6.9%	< 70%	Good

💡 What does this mean for you?Higher susceptibility and low slope increase monsoon water stagnation probability.

🚶 Walkability & Safety

↑ Higher is Better

ℹ️ What is Walkability & Safety?OSM amenity metrics reflect pedestrian, safety and urban accessibility infrastructure.

Footpaths

Higher better

Street Lamps

Higher better

Police/Fire Access

Presence

Scoring Breakdown

Parameter	Value	Target / Rule	Status
Footpaths (500m)	0	≥ 3	Concern
Sidewalk Roads (1km)	0	≥ 5	Concern
Nearest Police Station	— m	≤ 2000m	Context

💡 What does this mean for you?Higher OSM accessibility/safety features generally improve everyday livability.

⚠️ Risk Factors

↑ Higher is Better

ℹ️ What is Risk Factors?Nearby hazards and sensitive risk points mapped around this area.

Total Risks

Mapped points

Scoring Breakdown

Category	Risk	Distance / Severity	Meaning
Accessibility	Limited City Bus Service	0 m / Medium	Only 2 bus routes operational, low frequency
Future_threats	Rapid Development Pressure	0 m / Low	Multiple large-scale projects straining existing infrastructure
Infrastructure	Construction Phase Water Issues	500 m / Low	Water supply network still being extended to newer blocks

💡 What does this mean for you?Closer and severe risks can affect insurance, resale and safety comfort.

🌬️ Air Quality: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.

Component	Value	Weight/Rule	Contribution
Source	area_scores (latest by score_date)	Pipeline	Weighted model in backend

Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.

Final: See card score

💧 Water Quality: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.

Component	Value	Weight/Rule	Contribution
Source	area_scores (latest by score_date)	Pipeline	Weighted model in backend

Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.

Final: See card score

🧹 Sanitation: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.

Component	Value	Weight/Rule	Contribution
Source	area_scores (latest by score_date)	Pipeline	Weighted model in backend

Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.

Final: See card score

🛣️ Infrastructure: Infrastructure Score Formula

Formula: Composite weighted model from GHSL/ESA/VIIRS/Terrain features

Component	Value	Weight/Rule	Contribution
Urbanization index	17.76	20%	SMOD
Built-up balance	10.4%	15%	Best in moderate band
NTL stability	55.0%	15%	Power/activity consistency
Avg building height	0.97 m	10%	Vertical infra proxy
Impervious %	24.8%	10%	Moderate is optimal
Radiance	8.29	10%	Development proxy
Slope	0.10°	10%	Flatter is better
Green support	4.3%	10%	Tree + grass contribution

This is the same weighted structure used in Livability Infrastructure model.

Final: 35.24 / 100

🏥 Amenities: Amenity Score Breakdown

Formula: Each amenity category is capped at 100, final score is averaged across categories

Component	Value	Weight/Rule	Contribution
Hospitals 500m	0 * 33	Cap 100	Health access
Schools 1km	2 * 20	Cap 100	Education access
Markets 1km	1 * 33	Cap 100	Daily needs
Parks 500m	0 * 33	Cap 100	Open space
Transit 1km	1 * 50	Cap 100	Mobility

Category multipliers mirror the Livability snapshot logic.

Final: Final from amenity_scores table

🌳 Green Cover: Green Score Formula

Formula: Score = (NDVI*40%) + (Vegetation*30%) + (Dense Green*20%) + (Parks*10%)

Component	Value	Weight/Rule	Contribution
NDVI component	0.309 => 61.8	40%	24.7
Vegetation component	38.3% => 38.3	30%	11.5
Dense green component	20.2% => 40.4	20%	8.1
Parks component	0 => 0.0	10%	0.0

This matches the Livability GreenCover model weighting logic.

Final: 44.27 / 100

🔊 Noise: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.

Component	Value	Weight/Rule	Contribution
Source	area_scores (latest by score_date)	Pipeline	Weighted model in backend

Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.

Final: See card score

🌊 Flood Risk: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.

Component	Value	Weight/Rule	Contribution
Source	area_scores (latest by score_date)	Pipeline	Weighted model in backend

Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.

Final: See card score

🏚️ Earthquake Risk: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.

Component	Value	Weight/Rule	Contribution
Source	area_scores (latest by score_date)	Pipeline	Weighted model in backend

Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.

Final: See card score

🌡️ Land Surface Temp: LST Score Formula

Formula: Score = ((45 - LST Mean) / 25) * 100, clipped to [0,100]

Component	Value	Weight/Rule	Contribution
LST Mean	30.49 °C	Reference	20°C best, 45°C worst

Lower land surface temperature means better livability.

Final: 58.04 / 100

🏗️ Built-up Density: Built-up Score Formula

Formula: Score = 100 - Built-up %

Component	Value	Weight/Rule	Contribution
Built-up %	10.4%	Inverse	Lower is better

Dense concrete surfaces reduce infiltration and increase heat islands.

Final: 89.61 / 100

💡 Night-time Lights: Night-time Lights Formula

Formula: Score = min(100, (Avg Radiance / 50) * 100)

Component	Value	Weight/Rule	Contribution
Avg Radiance	9.62	Scale 0-50	Higher indicates activity

Higher night radiance generally tracks electrification and economic intensity.

Final: 19.24 / 100

🏞️ Water Bodies: Water Bodies Score Formula

Formula: Score = (Permanent Water Score * 70%) + (Seasonal Water Score * 30%)

Component	Value	Weight/Rule	Contribution
Permanent water	62.29%	70%	Scaled against 10% benchmark
Seasonal water	94.92%	30%	Scaled against 20% benchmark

Permanent water has higher score weight than seasonal water.

Final: 100.00 / 100

👥 Population Density: Population Density Formula

Formula: Score = ((20000 - density_per_km²) / 20000) * 100, clipped to [0,100]

Component	Value	Weight/Rule	Contribution
Density	886.6 /km²	Inverse scale	Lower density -> higher score

This follows the Livability PopulationDensity model.

Final: 95.57 / 100

⛲ Groundwater: Groundwater Score Formula

Formula: Weighted: Soil Moisture 30% + Recharge 25% + PDSI 20% + Trend 15% + Precipitation 10%

Component	Value	Weight/Rule	Contribution
Soil moisture	145.402	30%	Scaled to 0-200
Recharge estimate	1.36	25%	Scaled -200 to +400
PDSI	3.53	20%	Scaled -4 to +4
SM trend	0.0000	15%	Scaled -50 to +50
Precipitation	1,847.72	10%	Scaled 800 to 1800

Exactly reused from Livability Groundwater model logic.

Final: 66.51 / 100

🌧️ Waterlogging: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.

Component	Value	Weight/Rule	Contribution
Source	area_scores (latest by score_date)	Pipeline	Weighted model in backend

Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.

Final: See card score

🚶 Walkability & Safety: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.

Component	Value	Weight/Rule	Contribution
Source	area_scores (latest by score_date)	Pipeline	Weighted model in backend

Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.

Final: See card score

⚠️ Risk Factors: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.

Component	Value	Weight/Rule	Contribution
Source	area_scores (latest by score_date)	Pipeline	Weighted model in backend

Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.

Final: See card score

View full livability report for Sector 1 →

Compliance Status

RERA registration, filings, and compliance flags based on public CG-RERA records.

Compliance Status Based on public CG-RERA records

4 Passed

2 N/A

RERA Registration Active

Reg No. PCGRERA070919001036 — Status: New

Section 3 · Source · View Certificate · RERA Official Page

No Penalty Orders

1 order(s) on record, none with penalty sections (Sec 38/39/40/59/61/63)

Sec 38–63 · Source

No Recent Orders

No orders filed in the last 12 months (older: 1)

Source

Within Timeline

Target completion: 30 Dec 2026

Section 4 · Source

Quarterly Updates Not Available

No compliance snapshot data on record

Section 11 · Source

Annual Audit Not Available

No compliance snapshot data on record

Section 4(2)(l)(D) · Source

Each check is based on publicly available CG-RERA portal data as of Apr 2026. How this works →

Other Projects by Same Promoter (3)

Project	RERA No.	Status	District	Type
aranya city of woodland chatoud	PCGRERA211220001170	New	Raipur	Residential Plotted Development
ARANYA CITY OF WOODLAND PACHEDA	PCGRERA230618000300	Ongoing	Raipur	Plotted Development
aranya lake shore city	PCGRERA300618000425	Ongoing	Raipur	Plotted Development

Details

Registration, professional team, bank, promoters, and compliance history.

Registration Details

RERA Number: PCGRERA070919001036
Status: New
Project Type: Plotted Development
Approved Date: 07 Sep 2019
Original End Date: 31 Mar 2026

EWS Category: NO
Construction Cost: ₹ 18328000
Land Cost: ₹ 11427000
Proposed Completion: 30 Dec 2026
Authorised Person: BUDDHESHWAR VERMA
Website: www.aranyarealestate.com

View on Map

Professional Team

Role	Name	License / Membership
Statutory CA	HARPREET KOUR	432348
Quarterly CA	Amit Moryani	455077
Engineer	AMIT SEN	82/90
Architect	JAGAT LAKARA	CA/99/24320

Promoters

ARANYA REAL ESTATES PVT. LTD Company

ARANYA REAL ESTATES PVT. LTD

Legal Orders & Cases

RERA legal orders, complaints, and case statistics filed against this project.

Total Cases

Last 12 Months

Older Cases

PDFs Available

Legal Orders (1)

Complaint	Applicant	Section	Date	Source	PDF
M-COM-2024-02413	CG-RERA	Section 60	21 Jun 2024	This project

Location

Project address, coordinates, and nearby places.

Location Details

Address: PH NO .14 VILL BAHANAKADI TAH AARANG DIST RAIPUR CG
District: Raipur
Tehsil: Arang
Coordinates: 21.2746867, 81.7911105 View on Map

Neighborhood Intelligence

Explore nearby infrastructure around this project. Toggle categories to show/hide on the map.

Neighborhood Map 3 km radius

RERA Projects Near ARANYA LAKE SHORE CITY 4 found within 3 km

#	Project	District	Status	Distance
1	EMERALD CITY	Raipur	New	1.89 km
2	shivalaya park	Raipur	New	2.23 km
3	krishna vihar	Raipur	Ongoing	2.49 km
4	general scheme at dday colony mungi raipur	Raipur	New	2.94 km

Buyer Checklist

Documents and verifications a buyer should review before purchase.

Buyer Document Verification Checklist

Key documents a buyer should verify before purchasing in this project. Items marked Available have data on Seemankan.

12/14 verified

RERA Registration Certificate Available

Confirms the project is registered with RERA CG. Verify registration number, validity dates, and project details on the RERA portal.

RERA No: PCGRERA070919001036

View Certificate View on RERA Portal
Promoter Registration Certificate Available

Builder / colonizer company registration certificate. Confirms the promoter entity is a registered firm, company, or society.

Preview Preview
Approved Building / Sanction Plan Verify Independently

Building plan sanctioned by the local authority. Verify floor count, setbacks, and FSI compliance.
Layout Plan Available

Approved layout showing plot divisions, roads, open spaces, and common areas.

Preview
Title Deed / Ownership Proof Available

Proof that the promoter legally owns the land. Verify via Sub-Registrar records.

Preview
Encumbrance Certificate Available

Confirms the property is free from legal dues, mortgages, or liens. Obtain from Sub-Registrar office.

Preview
Land Use / Diversion Certificate Available

Required if land was converted from agricultural to non-agricultural use.

Preview
Architect Certificate Available

Certification from a registered architect confirming structural plans and compliance.

View View View +22 more
Structural Engineer Certificate Available

Certification from a structural engineer confirming building safety and load-bearing capacity.

View View View +22 more
CA Financial Certificate Available

Chartered Accountant certificate on financial status, project cost estimates, and fund utilization.

Preview View View +23 more
Commencement Certificate Verify Independently

Permission to begin construction issued by the local authority after plan approval.
NOCs (No Objection Certificates) Available

NOCs from fire department, environment, water supply, electricity board, and other authorities.

View View View +7 more
Project Brochure / Specification Available

Official brochure with unit types, amenities, and specifications. Compare with actual delivery.

Preview Preview
RERA Compliance Orders Available

Check if any orders, penalties, or directions have been issued against this project by RERA.

1 order(s) on record — review in Legal tab

Risk Zone Within 5 km

Buffer zones (water bodies, airport restrictions) and risk sites (landfills, waste processing) detected within 3 km (immediate) and 5 km (extended) of the project.

Risk zones (within 5 km)

3 km: 0 3–5 km: 0

Water bodies (river/nala/lake)

3 km: 0 3–5 km: 0

Landfill / waste sites

3 km: 0 3–5 km: 0

Airport buffer overlap

3 km: 0 3–5 km: 0

Risk Zone Map (3 km & 5 km rings) Project marker centered

All Clear

No mapped risk zones within 3 km of this project.

Reviews

Verified buyer reviews and ratings for this project.

No reviews yet. Be the first to review this project!

Login to Write a Review

You need to be signed in to submit a review for this project.