NEW Residential Development RERA Page

GENERATE REPORT

PRAYAGRAJ

21.2766, 81.6677 Explore area

District

Raipur

Area

—

Promoter

TULSI DAS PATEL

Project Information

Promoter TULSI DAS PATEL

Type Residential Development

Status New

Completion 29 Jun 2030

RERA No. PCGRERA060426002079

Registered 06 Apr 2026

Original End 29 Jun 2030

Total Units 518

EWS Category NO

Construction Cost ₹ 1495453000

Land Cost ₹ 348960000

Authorised Person TULSIDAS PATEL

Address DADALSIVANI, MOWA RAIPUR C G

At a Glance

518

Total Units

Units Sold

318

Unsold

Legal Cases

Jun 2030

Target Completion

Completion

Project Analysis

360° Project Intelligence

Comprehensive analysis across regulatory, livability, market, filing activity, and market readiness dimensions.

Regulatory

9 of 14 checks · Moderate Signals

Livability

Mowa · Moderate Signals

Legal

1 legal order(s) · 30 nearby

Filing Activity

24 docs · 0 quarterly updates

Market Readiness

New · due Jun 2030

Area Livability

Livability of Mowa

Eighteen environmental, infrastructure and amenity parameters for the nearest mapped area (Mowa — 0.00 km from this project). Click any parameter for the underlying readings, thresholds and what they mean.

🏠 Livability Parameters

Latest readings for Mowa. Only parameters with available data are shown below. Based on the latest readings for Mowa.

Composite Score

67.4 /100

Good

🌬️ Air Quality

Final Score: 93.2/100 ↑ Higher is Better

ℹ️ What is Air Quality?AQI summarizes PM2.5, PM10 and gases. Lower pollution values improve public health outcomes.

AQI

Satisfactory

PM2.5

35.3 µg/m³

≤ 40

PM10

100.2 µg/m³

≤ 60

Scoring Breakdown

Parameter	Value	Target / Rule	Status
PM2.5	35.3 µg/m³	≤ 40	Good
PM10	100.2 µg/m³	≤ 60	Concern
NO₂	12.4 µg/m³	≤ 40	Good

💡 What does this mean for you?Cleaner air lowers respiratory burden and improves outdoor comfort.

💧 Water Quality

Final Score: 74.7/100 ↑ Higher is Better

ℹ️ What is Water Quality?Water quality combines chemistry, supply duration and contamination markers.

TDS

385 ppm

≤ 500

7.14

6.5–8.5

Supply

5.7 hr/day

≥ 8 hr

Scoring Breakdown

Parameter	Value	Target / Rule	Status
TDS	385 ppm	≤ 500	Good
Fluoride	0.54 mg/L	≤ 1.0	Good
Turbidity	3.4 NTU	≤ 1	Concern

💡 What does this mean for you?Better supply quality and consistency reduces dependence on tanker/groundwater fallback.

🧹 Sanitation

Final Score: 67.3/100 ↑ Higher is Better

ℹ️ What is Sanitation?Sanitation reflects ODF status, sewage treatment and waste management regularity.

ODF

ODF+

ODF++

Sewage Coverage

55%

≥ 80%

Drainage

65%

≥ 90%

Scoring Breakdown

Parameter	Value	Target / Rule	Status
ODF Status	ODF+	ODF++	Info
Sewage Coverage	55%	≥ 80%	Concern
Drainage Coverage	65%	≥ 90%	Concern

💡 What does this mean for you?Higher sanitation maturity lowers disease exposure and neighborhood nuisance.

🛣️ Infrastructure

Final Score: 72.1/100 ↑ Higher is Better

ℹ️ What is Infrastructure?Infrastructure score combines land use, urbanization, built form, night lights and terrain indicators.

Built-up

40.7%

Balanced band

Tree Cover

30.2%

≥ 15%

Urbanization

95.6

Higher better

Scoring Breakdown

Parameter	Value	Target / Rule	Status
Built-up (LULC)	40.7%	40-70%	Contextual
Impervious Surface	18.8%	< 70%	Good
NDVI Mean	0.340	> 0.3	Good

Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison

Parameter	1000m	3000m	Average (Final)
Built-up (LULC) %	45.9%	35.4%	40.7%
Tree Cover %	29.3%	31.2%	30.2%
Urbanization Index	100.0	91.3	95.6
Infra Score	75.2	69.1	72.2

💡 What does this mean for you?Balanced built + green mix usually improves long-term livability resilience.

🏥 Amenities

Final Score: 84.8/100 ↑ Higher is Better

ℹ️ What is Amenities?Amenity score captures daily-access services in walk/short-drive radii.

Hospitals 500m

Target ≥1

Schools 1km

Target ≥3

Parks 500m

Target ≥1

Scoring Breakdown

Parameter	Value	Target / Rule	Status
Hospitals (500m)	1	≥1	Good
Schools (1km)	7	≥3	Good
Markets (1km)	8	≥1	Good

💡 What does this mean for you?Higher local amenity density improves convenience and walkability.

🌳 Green Cover

Final Score: 45.5/100 ↑ Higher is Better

ℹ️ What is Green Cover?NDVI and vegetation structure are measured from satellite imagery to estimate neighborhood greenery.

NDVI Mean

0.248

Greenness index

Vegetation

23.6%

% green pixels

Dense Green

14.0%

Thick canopy

Scoring Breakdown

Parameter	Value	Target / Rule	Status
NDVI Mean	0.248	0.5 maps to score 100	Weighted 40%
Vegetation %	23.6%	Direct % (cap 100)	Weighted 30%
Dense Green %	14.0%	Scaled from 50%	Weighted 20%
Parks within 500m	6	Count * 33 (cap 100)	Weighted 10%

Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison

Parameter	1000m	3000m	Average (Final)
NDVI Mean	0.232	0.264	0.248
Vegetation %	20.9%	26.3%	23.6%
Dense Green %	11.8%	16.3%	14.0%
Tree Canopy %	15.1%	18.4%	16.7%
Green Score	39.5	45.5	42.5

💡 What does this mean for you?Higher green metrics typically reduce heat stress and improve comfort.

🔊 Noise

Final Score: 74.2/100 ↑ Higher is Better

ℹ️ What is Noise?Noise uses measured day/night dB compared to CPCB zone limits.

Day dB

54.6

vs CPCB day limit

Night dB

49.6

vs CPCB night limit

Zone

commercial

CPCB class

Scoring Breakdown

Parameter	Value	Target / Rule	Status
Day Noise	54.6 dB	≤ 65.0 dB	Good
Night Noise	49.6 dB	≤ 55.0 dB	Good
Nearest Highway	1,208 m	Higher usually quieter	Info

💡 What does this mean for you?Chronic high noise impacts stress, sleep quality and perceived comfort.

🌊 Flood Risk

Final Score: 70.0/100 ↑ Higher is Better

ℹ️ What is Flood Risk?Flood risk combines river exposure and local waterlogging vulnerability.

Overall Risk

Highest

Lower is safer

River Risk

High

Lower is safer

Waterlogging

High

Lower is safer

Scoring Breakdown

Parameter	Value	Target / Rule	Status
Overall Risk	Highest	Low preferred	Info
River Flood Risk	High	Low preferred	Info
Waterlogging Risk	High	Low preferred	Info

💡 What does this mean for you?Lower flood risk means less disruption and lower hazard exposure.

🏚️ Earthquake Risk

Final Score: 25.0/100 ↑ Higher is Better

ℹ️ What is Earthquake Risk?Earthquake profile uses seismic zone, PGA and soil/liquefaction risk factors.

Seismic Zone

Zone II

Lower risk zone preferred

Risk Level

Low-Medium

Low preferred

Liquefaction

Medium

Low preferred

Scoring Breakdown

Parameter	Value	Target / Rule	Status
Seismic Zone	Zone II	II preferred	Info
Risk Level	Low-Medium	Low preferred	Info
PGA (475yr)	0.0155g	Lower preferred	Info

💡 What does this mean for you?Lower seismic hazard reduces structural and insurance risk exposure.

🌡️ Land Surface Temp

Final Score: 65.8/100 ↑ Higher is Better

ℹ️ What is Land Surface Temp?Land Surface Temperature reflects heat-island intensity from satellite thermal bands.

LST Mean

28.6°C

Lower better

LST Min

5.6°C

Context

LST Max

38.9°C

Lower better

Scoring Breakdown

Parameter	Value	Target / Rule	Status
LST Mean	28.6°C	20°C best / 45°C worst	Weighted by formula
LST Score	65.8	0-100	Computed

Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison

Parameter	1000m	3000m	Average (Final)
LST Mean (°C)	28.7	28.4	28.6
LST Min (°C)	4.9	6.2	5.6
LST Max (°C)	39.0	38.8	38.9
LST Score	65.3	66.3	65.8

💡 What does this mean for you?Higher heat exposure affects comfort, cooling load and health risk.

🏗️ Built-up Density

Final Score: 59.4/100 ↑ Higher is Better

ℹ️ What is Built-up Density?Built-up density measures extent of developed surface versus open space.

Built-up %

40.7%

Lower better

Open Space %

59.4%

Higher better

Built-up Score

59.4

0-100

Scoring Breakdown

Parameter	Value	Target / Rule	Status
Built-up %	40.7%	Inverse scoring	Score = 100 - builtup%
Open Space %	59.4%	Context	Info

Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison

Parameter	1000m	3000m	Average (Final)
Built-up %	45.9%	35.4%	40.7%
Open Space %	54.1%	64.6%	59.4%
Built-up Score	54.1	64.6	59.4

💡 What does this mean for you?Very high built-up often raises heat and runoff while reducing open environmental buffers.

💡 Night-time Lights

Final Score: 30.9/100 ↑ Higher is Better

ℹ️ What is Night-time Lights?Nighttime lights are a proxy for economic activity and electrification intensity.

Avg Radiance

15.44

Higher better

Max Radiance

25.77

Context

NTL Score

30.9

0-100

Scoring Breakdown

Parameter	Value	Target / Rule	Status
Avg Radiance	15.44	Scaled to 50	Score = min(100, avg/50*100)
NTL Score	30.9	0-100	Computed

Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison

Parameter	1000m	3000m	Average (Final)
Avg Radiance	14.55	16.33	15.44
Max Radiance	25.00	26.53	25.77
NTL Score	29.1	32.7	30.9

💡 What does this mean for you?Higher radiance often indicates stronger urban activity but can correlate with light pollution.

🏞️ Water Bodies

Final Score: 100.0/100 ↑ Higher is Better

ℹ️ What is Water Bodies?Water-bodies score reflects permanent and seasonal water presence in the analysis radius.

Permanent Water

60.00%

Higher generally better

Seasonal Water

96.20%

Context

Water Score

100.0

0-100

Scoring Breakdown

Parameter	Value	Target / Rule	Status
Permanent Water %	60.00%	70% weight	Scaled against 10%
Seasonal Water %	96.20%	30% weight	Scaled against 20%
Water Score	100.0	0-100	Computed

Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison

Parameter	1000m	3000m	Average (Final)
Permanent Water %	65.78%	54.22%	60.00%
Seasonal Water %	96.40%	95.99%	96.20%
Water Score	100.0	100.0	100.0

💡 What does this mean for you?Water presence can support cooling, recharge and ecological quality.

👥 Population Density

Final Score: 85.1/100 ↑ Higher is Better

ℹ️ What is Population Density?Population density indicates urban crowding pressure around the area.

Population

50,059

Estimated residents

Density/km²

2,976.7

Lower better for this score

Score

85.1

0-100

Scoring Breakdown

Parameter	Value	Target / Rule	Status
Density/km²	2,976.7	Inverse scale up to 20,000	Lower -> higher score
Score	85.1	0-100	Computed

Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison

Parameter	1000m	3000m	Average (Final)
Population Total	8,526	91,592	50,059
Density / km²	2,714.0	3,239.4	2,976.7
Pop Density Score	86.4	83.8	85.1

💡 What does this mean for you?Extremely high density can increase pressure on services and mobility.

⛲ Groundwater

Final Score: 63.8/100 ↑ Higher is Better

ℹ️ What is Groundwater?Groundwater score combines moisture, recharge, drought and trend indicators.

Soil Moisture

134.057

Higher better

Recharge

2.64

Higher better

PDSI

3.09

Higher better

Scoring Breakdown

Parameter	Value	Target / Rule	Status
Soil Moisture	134.057	30% weight	Scaled
Recharge	2.64	25% weight	Scaled
PDSI	3.09	20% weight	Scaled
SM Trend	0.0000	15% weight	Scaled
Precipitation	1,863.81	10% weight	Scaled

Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison

Parameter	1000m	3000m	Average (Final)
Soil Moisture	134.469	133.645	134.057
Recharge Estimate	2.94	2.34	2.64
PDSI	3.10	3.09	3.09
Groundwater Score	63.9	63.7	63.8

💡 What does this mean for you?Higher score suggests better long-term aquifer and moisture support conditions.

🌧️ Waterlogging

↑ Higher is Better

ℹ️ What is Waterlogging?Waterlogging combines topography, imperviousness and wetness indices across nearby grid cells.

Grid Count

Sampled cells

Avg Susceptibility

52.2

Lower is safer

High Risk Grids

High / Very High

Scoring Breakdown

Parameter	Value	Target	Status
Avg Susceptibility	52.2	< 40	Concern
Avg Slope	2.56°	> 1°	Good
Avg Impervious	11.1%	< 70%	Good

💡 What does this mean for you?Higher susceptibility and low slope increase monsoon water stagnation probability.

🚶 Walkability & Safety

↑ Higher is Better

ℹ️ What is Walkability & Safety?OSM amenity metrics reflect pedestrian, safety and urban accessibility infrastructure.

Footpaths

Higher better

Street Lamps

Higher better

Police/Fire Access

Presence

Scoring Breakdown

Parameter	Value	Target / Rule	Status
Footpaths (500m)	0	≥ 3	Concern
Sidewalk Roads (1km)	0	≥ 5	Concern
Nearest Police Station	1,050 m	≤ 2000m	Context

💡 What does this mean for you?Higher OSM accessibility/safety features generally improve everyday livability.

⚠️ Risk Factors

↑ Higher is Better

ℹ️ What is Risk Factors?Nearby hazards and sensitive risk points mapped around this area.

Total Risks

Mapped points

Scoring Breakdown

Category	Risk	Distance / Severity	Meaning
Land_zoning	Unregulated Colonies on Forest Land	600 m / High	Colonies developed on revenue/forest land without proper clearance
Future_threats	Rapid Construction Saturation	0 m / Medium	Over 50 ongoing construction projects in 2 sq km area
Air_pollution	Mowa Flyover Traffic Pollution	200 m / Medium	Heavy diesel vehicle traffic on NH-53 approach
Infrastructure	Internal Road Network Incomplete	300 m / Medium	Many colony roads unpaved or under heavy construction
Water_drainage	New Colony Drainage Incomplete	400 m / Medium	Several new colonies without proper drainage infrastructure

💡 What does this mean for you?Closer and severe risks can affect insurance, resale and safety comfort.

🌬️ Air Quality: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.

Component	Value	Weight/Rule	Contribution
Source	area_scores (latest by score_date)	Pipeline	Weighted model in backend

Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.

Final: See card score

💧 Water Quality: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.

Component	Value	Weight/Rule	Contribution
Source	area_scores (latest by score_date)	Pipeline	Weighted model in backend

Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.

Final: See card score

🧹 Sanitation: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.

Component	Value	Weight/Rule	Contribution
Source	area_scores (latest by score_date)	Pipeline	Weighted model in backend

Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.

Final: See card score

🛣️ Infrastructure: Infrastructure Score Formula

Formula: Composite weighted model from GHSL/ESA/VIIRS/Terrain features

Component	Value	Weight/Rule	Contribution
Urbanization index	95.64	20%	SMOD
Built-up balance	40.7%	15%	Best in moderate band
NTL stability	69.0%	15%	Power/activity consistency
Avg building height	4.84 m	10%	Vertical infra proxy
Impervious %	18.8%	10%	Moderate is optimal
Radiance	15.50	10%	Development proxy
Slope	0.10°	10%	Flatter is better
Green support	30.2%	10%	Tree + grass contribution

This is the same weighted structure used in Livability Infrastructure model.

Final: 72.22 / 100

🏥 Amenities: Amenity Score Breakdown

Formula: Each amenity category is capped at 100, final score is averaged across categories

Component	Value	Weight/Rule	Contribution
Hospitals 500m	1 * 33	Cap 100	Health access
Schools 1km	7 * 20	Cap 100	Education access
Markets 1km	8 * 33	Cap 100	Daily needs
Parks 500m	6 * 33	Cap 100	Open space
Transit 1km	0 * 50	Cap 100	Mobility

Category multipliers mirror the Livability snapshot logic.

Final: Final from amenity_scores table

🌳 Green Cover: Green Score Formula

Formula: Score = (NDVI*40%) + (Vegetation*30%) + (Dense Green*20%) + (Parks*10%)

Component	Value	Weight/Rule	Contribution
NDVI component	0.248 => 49.6	40%	19.8
Vegetation component	23.6% => 23.6	30%	7.1
Dense green component	14.0% => 28.1	20%	5.6
Parks component	6 => 100.0	10%	10.0

This matches the Livability GreenCover model weighting logic.

Final: 42.52 / 100

🔊 Noise: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.

Component	Value	Weight/Rule	Contribution
Source	area_scores (latest by score_date)	Pipeline	Weighted model in backend

Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.

Final: See card score

🌊 Flood Risk: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.

Component	Value	Weight/Rule	Contribution
Source	area_scores (latest by score_date)	Pipeline	Weighted model in backend

Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.

Final: See card score

🏚️ Earthquake Risk: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.

Component	Value	Weight/Rule	Contribution
Source	area_scores (latest by score_date)	Pipeline	Weighted model in backend

Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.

Final: See card score

🌡️ Land Surface Temp: LST Score Formula

Formula: Score = ((45 - LST Mean) / 25) * 100, clipped to [0,100]

Component	Value	Weight/Rule	Contribution
LST Mean	28.55 °C	Reference	20°C best, 45°C worst

Lower land surface temperature means better livability.

Final: 65.80 / 100

🏗️ Built-up Density: Built-up Score Formula

Formula: Score = 100 - Built-up %

Component	Value	Weight/Rule	Contribution
Built-up %	40.7%	Inverse	Lower is better

Dense concrete surfaces reduce infiltration and increase heat islands.

Final: 59.35 / 100

💡 Night-time Lights: Night-time Lights Formula

Formula: Score = min(100, (Avg Radiance / 50) * 100)

Component	Value	Weight/Rule	Contribution
Avg Radiance	15.44	Scale 0-50	Higher indicates activity

Higher night radiance generally tracks electrification and economic intensity.

Final: 30.88 / 100

🏞️ Water Bodies: Water Bodies Score Formula

Formula: Score = (Permanent Water Score * 70%) + (Seasonal Water Score * 30%)

Component	Value	Weight/Rule	Contribution
Permanent water	60.00%	70%	Scaled against 10% benchmark
Seasonal water	96.20%	30%	Scaled against 20% benchmark

Permanent water has higher score weight than seasonal water.

Final: 100.00 / 100

👥 Population Density: Population Density Formula

Formula: Score = ((20000 - density_per_km²) / 20000) * 100, clipped to [0,100]

Component	Value	Weight/Rule	Contribution
Density	2,976.7 /km²	Inverse scale	Lower density -> higher score

This follows the Livability PopulationDensity model.

Final: 85.12 / 100

⛲ Groundwater: Groundwater Score Formula

Formula: Weighted: Soil Moisture 30% + Recharge 25% + PDSI 20% + Trend 15% + Precipitation 10%

Component	Value	Weight/Rule	Contribution
Soil moisture	134.057	30%	Scaled to 0-200
Recharge estimate	2.64	25%	Scaled -200 to +400
PDSI	3.09	20%	Scaled -4 to +4
SM trend	0.0000	15%	Scaled -50 to +50
Precipitation	1,863.81	10%	Scaled 800 to 1800

Exactly reused from Livability Groundwater model logic.

Final: 63.79 / 100

🌧️ Waterlogging: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.

Component	Value	Weight/Rule	Contribution
Source	area_scores (latest by score_date)	Pipeline	Weighted model in backend

Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.

Final: See card score

🚶 Walkability & Safety: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.

Component	Value	Weight/Rule	Contribution
Source	area_scores (latest by score_date)	Pipeline	Weighted model in backend

Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.

Final: See card score

⚠️ Risk Factors: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.

Component	Value	Weight/Rule	Contribution
Source	area_scores (latest by score_date)	Pipeline	Weighted model in backend

Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.

Final: See card score

View full livability report for Mowa →

Compliance Status

RERA registration, filings, and compliance flags based on public CG-RERA records.

Compliance Status Based on public CG-RERA records

3 Passed

1 Warning

2 N/A

RERA Registration Active

Reg No. PCGRERA060426002079 — Status: New

Section 3 · Source · View Certificate · RERA Official Page

No Penalty Orders

1 order(s) on record, none with penalty sections (Sec 38/39/40/59/61/63)

Sec 38–63 · Source

1 Order(s) in Last 12 Months

Recent: SM-PAP-2026-03568

Source · SM-PAP-2026-03568

Within Timeline

Target completion: 29 Jun 2030

Section 4 · Source

Quarterly Updates Not Available

No compliance snapshot data on record

Section 11 · Source

Annual Audit Not Available

No compliance snapshot data on record

Section 4(2)(l)(D) · Source

Each check is based on publicly available CG-RERA portal data as of Apr 2026. How this works →

Details

Registration, professional team, bank, promoters, and compliance history.

Registration Details

RERA Number: PCGRERA060426002079
Status: New
Project Type: Residential Development
Approved Date: 06 Apr 2026
Original End Date: 29 Jun 2030

EWS Category: NO
Construction Cost: ₹ 1495453000
Land Cost: ₹ 348960000
Proposed Completion: 29 Jun 2030
Authorised Person: TULSIDAS PATEL

View on Map

Promoters

Tulsi DAS patel Partnership Firm

MR. TULSI DAS PATEL Partnership Firm

Legal Orders & Cases

RERA legal orders, complaints, and case statistics filed against this project.

Total Cases

Last 12 Months

Older Cases

PDFs Available

Legal Orders (1)

Complaint	Applicant	Section	Date	Source	PDF
SM-PAP-2026-03568	CG-RERA	-	02 Apr 2026	This project

Location

Project address, coordinates, and nearby places.

Location Details

Address: DADALSIVANI, MOWA RAIPUR C G
District: Raipur
Tehsil: Raipur
Coordinates: 21.2766435, 81.6677299 View on Map

Neighborhood Intelligence

Explore nearby infrastructure around this project. Toggle categories to show/hide on the map.

Neighborhood Map 3 km radius

RERA Projects Near PRAYAGRAJ 30 found within 3 km

#	Project	District	Status	Distance
1	DOLPHIN PREMIUM PLAZA	Raipur	Ongoing	0.22 km
2	HARSH HORIZON	Raipur	Ongoing	0.29 km
3	ELITE HOME	Raipur	Ongoing	0.31 km
4	ELITE HOMES -2	Raipur	New	0.34 km
5	MAPPLE TREE	Raipur	Ongoing	0.37 km
6	GANPATI TOWER	Raipur	Ongoing	0.38 km
7	celino paradise	Raipur	Ongoing	0.46 km
8	ASTHA LANDMARK	Raipur	New	0.49 km
9	aishwarya market	Raipur	Ongoing	0.57 km
10	ABHINAV SKY	Raipur	Ongoing	0.58 km
11	HARSH PRIDE (PHASE-II)	Raipur	Ongoing	0.81 km
12	v.v.d. city	Raipur	New	0.88 km
13	HARSH PRIDE (PHASE-I)	Raipur	Ongoing	0.89 km
14	ASHOKA IKON PHASE-I	Raipur	Ongoing	0.93 km
15	EUPHORIA APARTMENT PHASE (II)	Raipur	Ongoing	1.01 km
16	ORRANGE ATMOSPHERE	Raipur	New	1.01 km
17	CHANDRA SQUARE	Raipur	Ongoing	1.03 km
18	EUPHORIA APARTMENT	Raipur	Ongoing	1.03 km
19	avani avenue extension	Raipur	New	1.06 km
20	AVANI AVENUE	Raipur	Ongoing	1.06 km
21	raheja homes	Raipur	New	1.08 km
22	ORRANGE HIVE	Raipur	Ongoing	1.14 km
23	SARVAM	Raipur	Ongoing	1.14 km
24	luxora & edge	Raipur	Ongoing	1.17 km
25	orchid views	Raipur	New	1.20 km
26	ORRANGE COUNTY	Raipur	Ongoing	1.20 km
27	ORCHID VIEWS	Raipur	New	1.22 km
28	abhinav city	Raipur	New	1.39 km
29	ABHINAV APARTMENT	Raipur	New	1.48 km
30	ASHOKA KOHINOOR PHASE-II	Raipur	New	1.54 km

Buyer Checklist

Documents and verifications a buyer should review before purchase.

Buyer Document Verification Checklist

Key documents a buyer should verify before purchasing in this project. Items marked Available have data on Seemankan.

10/14 verified

RERA Registration Certificate Available

Confirms the project is registered with RERA CG. Verify registration number, validity dates, and project details on the RERA portal.

RERA No: PCGRERA060426002079

View Certificate View on RERA Portal
Promoter Registration Certificate Available

Builder / colonizer company registration certificate. Confirms the promoter entity is a registered firm, company, or society.

Preview Preview
Approved Building / Sanction Plan Available

Building plan sanctioned by the local authority. Verify floor count, setbacks, and FSI compliance.

Preview Preview
Layout Plan Available

Approved layout showing plot divisions, roads, open spaces, and common areas.

Preview
Title Deed / Ownership Proof Available

Proof that the promoter legally owns the land. Verify via Sub-Registrar records.

Preview
Encumbrance Certificate Available

Confirms the property is free from legal dues, mortgages, or liens. Obtain from Sub-Registrar office.

Preview
Land Use / Diversion Certificate Available

Required if land was converted from agricultural to non-agricultural use.

Preview
Architect Certificate Verify Independently

Certification from a registered architect confirming structural plans and compliance.
Structural Engineer Certificate Verify Independently

Certification from a structural engineer confirming building safety and load-bearing capacity.
CA Financial Certificate Available

Chartered Accountant certificate on financial status, project cost estimates, and fund utilization.

Preview
Commencement Certificate Verify Independently

Permission to begin construction issued by the local authority after plan approval.
NOCs (No Objection Certificates) Verify Independently

NOCs from fire department, environment, water supply, electricity board, and other authorities.
Project Brochure / Specification Available

Official brochure with unit types, amenities, and specifications. Compare with actual delivery.

Preview
RERA Compliance Orders Available

Check if any orders, penalties, or directions have been issued against this project by RERA.

1 order(s) on record — review in Legal tab

Risk Zone Within 5 km

Buffer zones (water bodies, airport restrictions) and risk sites (landfills, waste processing) detected within 3 km (immediate) and 5 km (extended) of the project.

Risk zones (within 5 km)

3 km: 5 3–5 km: 10

Water bodies (river/nala/lake)

3 km: 3 3–5 km: 10

Landfill / waste sites

3 km: 2 3–5 km: 0

Airport buffer overlap

3 km: 0 3–5 km: 0

Risk Zone Map (3 km & 5 km rings) Project marker centered

Water Bodies (13)

Kendri Talab ≤3 km

Tank · 50m buffer

1.04 km
Boriyakhurd Talab ≤3 km

Tank · 50m buffer

2.26 km
Heerapur Talab ≤3 km

Pond · 50m buffer

2.52 km
Kharun River 3–5 km

River · 75m buffer

3.24 km
Kharun Left Bank Canal 3–5 km

Canal · 20m buffer

3.53 km
Muktangan Talab 3–5 km

Tank · 50m buffer

3.91 km
Mowa Nala 3–5 km

Nala · 20m buffer

3.97 km
Telibandha Nala 3–5 km

Nala · 20m buffer

4.01 km

Landfill / Waste Sites (2)

SLRM Centre Tendua (Tundra) ≤3 km

Waste processing · 200m buffer

1.11 km
Daldal Seoni MSW Transfer Station ≤3 km

Transfer station · 100m buffer

1.16 km

Reviews

Verified buyer reviews and ratings for this project.

Buyer Ratings

5.0

1 reviews

Construction Quality

4.0

Amenities

3.0

Location

5.0

Value for Money

3.0

Timely Delivery

2.0

satish Booked

15 Apr 2026

test

testttt

test1

test3

Was this helpful?

Login to Write a Review

You need to be signed in to submit a review for this project.