Home / RERA Projects / AISHWARYA EMPIRE PHASE - IV
ONGOING Residential Development RERA Page Project Website
GENERATE REPORT

AISHWARYA EMPIRE PHASE - IV

Compliance Status
Compliant
21.2490, 81.6914 Explore area
District
Raipur
Area
—
Promoter
SANKALP HOMES
Project Information
Promoter SANKALP HOMES
Type Residential Development
Status Ongoing
Completion 27 Feb 2027
RERA No. PCGRERA010722001452
Registered —
EWS Category NO
Construction Cost ₹ 89071000
Land Cost ₹ 6681000
Authorised Person nikhil kumar dhagat
Website www.aishwaryagroup.co
Address VILLAGE - LABHANDIH ,TEHSIL & DIST - RAIPUR
At a Glance
-
Total Units
-
Units Sold
-
Unsold
0
Legal Cases
Feb 2027
Target Completion
5%
Completion
Amenities & Facilities (20)
BOUNDARY WALL
100%
CLUB HOUSE
100%
COMMUNITY BUILDINGS
90%
ENERGY MAANAGEMENT
0%
FIRE PROTECTION AND FIRE SAFETY REQUIREMENTS
0%
GYM
100%
INTERNAL ROADS AND FOOTPATHS
40%
LANDSCAPING AND TREE PLANTING
0%
OPEN PARK
95%
OPEN PARKING
0%
PLACE OF WORSHIP
100%
SECURITY SERVICE
100%
SEWERAGE
0%
SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT AND DISPOSAL
0%
STORM WATER DRAINS
0%
STREET LIGHTING
0%
SWIMMING POOL
100%
TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL OF SEWERAGE AND SULLAGE WAT
0%
WATER CONSERVATION RAIN WATER HARVESTING
0%
WATER SUPPLY
0%
Project Professionals
PRATIK PRADEEP UMALE
QUARTERLY CA
YOGESH KUMAR BANI
ENGINEER
NEENA SHRIVASTAV
ARCHITECT
Project Analysis

360° Project Intelligence

Comprehensive analysis across regulatory, livability, market, filing activity, and market readiness dimensions.

Regulatory
43
6 of 14 checks · Weak Signals
Livability
62
Magneto Zone · Moderate Signals
Legal
0
No legal orders on record · 30 nearby
Filing Activity
62
50 docs · 12 quarterly updates
Market Readiness
35
Ongoing · due Feb 2027
Area Livability

Livability of Magneto Zone

Eighteen environmental, infrastructure and amenity parameters for the nearest mapped area (Magneto Zone — 1.17 km from this project). Click any parameter for the underlying readings, thresholds and what they mean.



🏠 Livability Parameters

Latest readings for Magneto Zone. Only parameters with available data are shown below. Based on the latest readings for Magneto Zone.

B
Composite Score
62.4 /100
Good

🌬️ Air Quality

Final Score: 97.6/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Air Quality?AQI summarizes PM2.5, PM10 and gases. Lower pollution values improve public health outcomes.
AQI
56
Satisfactory
PM2.5
30.7 µg/m³
≤ 40
PM10
85.6 µg/m³
≤ 60
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
PM2.5 30.7 µg/m³ ≤ 40
Good
PM10 85.6 µg/m³ ≤ 60
Concern
NO₂ 19.8 µg/m³ ≤ 40
Good
💡 What does this mean for you?Cleaner air lowers respiratory burden and improves outdoor comfort.

💧 Water Quality

Final Score: 63.3/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Water Quality?Water quality combines chemistry, supply duration and contamination markers.
TDS
414 ppm
≤ 500
pH
7.18
6.5–8.5
Supply
4.5 hr/day
≥ 8 hr
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
TDS 414 ppm ≤ 500
Good
Fluoride 0.92 mg/L ≤ 1.0
Good
Turbidity 5.2 NTU ≤ 1
Concern
💡 What does this mean for you?Better supply quality and consistency reduces dependence on tanker/groundwater fallback.

🧹 Sanitation

Final Score: 83.9/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Sanitation?Sanitation reflects ODF status, sewage treatment and waste management regularity.
ODF
ODF++
ODF++
Sewage Coverage
78%
≥ 80%
Drainage
82%
≥ 90%
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
ODF Status ODF++ ODF++
Info
Sewage Coverage 78% ≥ 80%
Concern
Drainage Coverage 82% ≥ 90%
Concern
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher sanitation maturity lowers disease exposure and neighborhood nuisance.

🛣️ Infrastructure

Final Score: 71.5/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Infrastructure?Infrastructure score combines land use, urbanization, built form, night lights and terrain indicators.
Built-up
38.0%
Balanced band
Tree Cover
24.1%
≥ 15%
Urbanization
94.3
Higher better
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Built-up (LULC) 38.0% 40-70%
Contextual
Impervious Surface 16.4% < 70%
Good
NDVI Mean 0.310 > 0.3
Good
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Built-up (LULC) % 34.7% 41.4% 38.0%
Tree Cover % 31.7% 16.5% 24.1%
Urbanization Index 100.0 88.6 94.3
Infra Score 74.0 69.0 71.9
💡 What does this mean for you?Balanced built + green mix usually improves long-term livability resilience.

🏥 Amenities

Final Score: 81.7/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Amenities?Amenity score captures daily-access services in walk/short-drive radii.
Hospitals 500m
0
Target ≥1
Schools 1km
11
Target ≥3
Parks 500m
0
Target ≥1
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Hospitals (500m) 0 ≥1
Concern
Schools (1km) 11 ≥3
Good
Markets (1km) 8 ≥1
Good
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher local amenity density improves convenience and walkability.

🌳 Green Cover

Final Score: 25.5/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Green Cover?NDVI and vegetation structure are measured from satellite imagery to estimate neighborhood greenery.
NDVI Mean
0.199
Greenness index
Vegetation
14.4%
% green pixels
Dense Green
4.5%
Thick canopy
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
NDVI Mean 0.199 0.5 maps to score 100
Weighted 40%
Vegetation % 14.4% Direct % (cap 100)
Weighted 30%
Dense Green % 4.5% Scaled from 50%
Weighted 20%
Parks within 500m 0 Count * 33 (cap 100)
Weighted 10%
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
NDVI Mean 0.166 0.231 0.199
Vegetation % 14.8% 14.0% 14.4%
Dense Green % 2.0% 7.1% 4.5%
Tree Canopy % 8.5% 12.4% 10.5%
Green Score 18.5 25.5 22.1
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher green metrics typically reduce heat stress and improve comfort.

🔊 Noise

Final Score: 61.6/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Noise?Noise uses measured day/night dB compared to CPCB zone limits.
Day dB
50.7
vs CPCB day limit
Night dB
48.8
vs CPCB night limit
Zone
CPCB class
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Day Noise 50.7 dB ≤ 65.0 dB
Good
Night Noise 48.8 dB ≤ 55.0 dB
Good
Nearest Highway 1,028 m Higher usually quieter
Info
💡 What does this mean for you?Chronic high noise impacts stress, sleep quality and perceived comfort.

🌊 Flood Risk

Final Score: 55.0/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Flood Risk?Flood risk combines river exposure and local waterlogging vulnerability.
Overall Risk
High
Lower is safer
River Risk
Medium
Lower is safer
Waterlogging
High
Lower is safer
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Overall Risk High Low preferred
Info
River Flood Risk Medium Low preferred
Info
Waterlogging Risk High Low preferred
Info
💡 What does this mean for you?Lower flood risk means less disruption and lower hazard exposure.

🏚️ Earthquake Risk

Final Score: 25.0/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Earthquake Risk?Earthquake profile uses seismic zone, PGA and soil/liquefaction risk factors.
Seismic Zone
Zone II
Lower risk zone preferred
Risk Level
Low-Medium
Low preferred
Liquefaction
Low
Low preferred
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Seismic Zone Zone II II preferred
Info
Risk Level Low-Medium Low preferred
Info
PGA (475yr) 0.0155g Lower preferred
Info
💡 What does this mean for you?Lower seismic hazard reduces structural and insurance risk exposure.

🌡️ Land Surface Temp

Final Score: 64.0/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Land Surface Temp?Land Surface Temperature reflects heat-island intensity from satellite thermal bands.
LST Mean
29.0°C
Lower better
LST Min
2.5°C
Context
LST Max
40.6°C
Lower better
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
LST Mean 29.0°C 20°C best / 45°C worst
Weighted by formula
LST Score 64.0 0-100
Computed
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
LST Mean (°C) 29.1 28.9 29.0
LST Min (°C) 3.1 1.9 2.5
LST Max (°C) 40.8 40.4 40.6
LST Score 63.6 64.4 64.0
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher heat exposure affects comfort, cooling load and health risk.

🏗️ Built-up Density

Final Score: 62.0/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Built-up Density?Built-up density measures extent of developed surface versus open space.
Built-up %
38.0%
Lower better
Open Space %
62.0%
Higher better
Built-up Score
62.0
0-100
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Built-up % 38.0% Inverse scoring
Score = 100 - builtup%
Open Space % 62.0% Context
Info
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Built-up % 34.7% 41.4% 38.0%
Open Space % 65.3% 58.6% 62.0%
Built-up Score 65.3 58.6 62.0
💡 What does this mean for you?Very high built-up often raises heat and runoff while reducing open environmental buffers.

💡 Night-time Lights

Final Score: 52.2/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Night-time Lights?Nighttime lights are a proxy for economic activity and electrification intensity.
Avg Radiance
26.08
Higher better
Max Radiance
38.69
Context
NTL Score
52.2
0-100
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Avg Radiance 26.08 Scaled to 50
Score = min(100, avg/50*100)
NTL Score 52.2 0-100
Computed
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Avg Radiance 29.16 23.00 26.08
Max Radiance 41.75 35.62 38.69
NTL Score 58.3 46.0 52.2
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher radiance often indicates stronger urban activity but can correlate with light pollution.

🏞️ Water Bodies

Final Score: 50.0/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Water Bodies?Water-bodies score reflects permanent and seasonal water presence in the analysis radius.
Permanent Water
31.26%
Higher generally better
Seasonal Water
48.16%
Context
Water Score
100.0
0-100
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Permanent Water % 31.26% 70% weight
Scaled against 10%
Seasonal Water % 48.16% 30% weight
Scaled against 20%
Water Score 100.0 0-100
Computed
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Permanent Water % 0.00% 62.52% 31.26%
Seasonal Water % 0.00% 96.32% 48.16%
Water Score 0.0 100.0 100.0
💡 What does this mean for you?Water presence can support cooling, recharge and ecological quality.

👥 Population Density

Final Score: 80.1/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Population Density?Population density indicates urban crowding pressure around the area.
Population
61,384
Estimated residents
Density/km²
3,984.0
Lower better for this score
Score
80.1
0-100
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Density/km² 3,984.0 Inverse scale up to 20,000
Lower -> higher score
Score 80.1 0-100
Computed
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Population Total 12,815 109,952 61,384
Density / km² 4,079.2 3,888.7 3,984.0
Pop Density Score 79.6 80.6 80.1
💡 What does this mean for you?Extremely high density can increase pressure on services and mobility.

⛲ Groundwater

Final Score: 63.9/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Groundwater?Groundwater score combines moisture, recharge, drought and trend indicators.
Soil Moisture
136.274
Higher better
Recharge
1.19
Higher better
PDSI
3.01
Higher better
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Soil Moisture 136.274 30% weight
Scaled
Recharge 1.19 25% weight
Scaled
PDSI 3.01 20% weight
Scaled
SM Trend 0.0000 15% weight
Scaled
Precipitation 1,866.01 10% weight
Scaled
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Soil Moisture 136.483 136.065 136.274
Recharge Estimate 0.90 1.49 1.19
PDSI 3.00 3.02 3.01
Groundwater Score 63.8 63.9 63.9
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher score suggests better long-term aquifer and moisture support conditions.

🌧️ Waterlogging

↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Waterlogging?Waterlogging combines topography, imperviousness and wetness indices across nearby grid cells.
Grid Count
28
Sampled cells
Avg Susceptibility
49.8
Lower is safer
High Risk Grids
10
High / Very High
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTargetStatus
Avg Susceptibility 49.8 < 40
Concern
Avg Slope 2.74° > 1°
Good
Avg Impervious 24.3% < 70%
Good
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher susceptibility and low slope increase monsoon water stagnation probability.

🚶 Walkability & Safety

↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Walkability & Safety?OSM amenity metrics reflect pedestrian, safety and urban accessibility infrastructure.
Footpaths
0
Higher better
Street Lamps
0
Higher better
Police/Fire Access
0
Presence
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Footpaths (500m) 0 ≥ 3
Concern
Sidewalk Roads (1km) 0 ≥ 5
Concern
Nearest Police Station — m ≤ 2000m
Context
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher OSM accessibility/safety features generally improve everyday livability.

🌬️ Air Quality: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

💧 Water Quality: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🧹 Sanitation: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🛣️ Infrastructure: Infrastructure Score Formula

Formula: Composite weighted model from GHSL/ESA/VIIRS/Terrain features
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Urbanization index94.3120%SMOD
Built-up balance38.0%15%Best in moderate band
NTL stability70.0%15%Power/activity consistency
Avg building height5.63 m10%Vertical infra proxy
Impervious %16.4%10%Moderate is optimal
Radiance26.2610%Development proxy
Slope0.10°10%Flatter is better
Green support24.1%10%Tree + grass contribution
This is the same weighted structure used in Livability Infrastructure model.
Final: 71.86 / 100

🏥 Amenities: Amenity Score Breakdown

Formula: Each amenity category is capped at 100, final score is averaged across categories
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Hospitals 500m0 * 33Cap 100Health access
Schools 1km11 * 20Cap 100Education access
Markets 1km8 * 33Cap 100Daily needs
Parks 500m0 * 33Cap 100Open space
Transit 1km2 * 50Cap 100Mobility
Category multipliers mirror the Livability snapshot logic.
Final: Final from amenity_scores table

🌳 Green Cover: Green Score Formula

Formula: Score = (NDVI*40%) + (Vegetation*30%) + (Dense Green*20%) + (Parks*10%)
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
NDVI component0.199 => 39.840%15.9
Vegetation component14.4% => 14.430%4.3
Dense green component4.5% => 9.120%1.8
Parks component0 => 0.010%0.0
This matches the Livability GreenCover model weighting logic.
Final: 22.05 / 100

🔊 Noise: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🌊 Flood Risk: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🏚️ Earthquake Risk: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🌡️ Land Surface Temp: LST Score Formula

Formula: Score = ((45 - LST Mean) / 25) * 100, clipped to [0,100]
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
LST Mean29.00 °CReference20°C best, 45°C worst
Lower land surface temperature means better livability.
Final: 64.00 / 100

🏗️ Built-up Density: Built-up Score Formula

Formula: Score = 100 - Built-up %
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Built-up %38.0%InverseLower is better
Dense concrete surfaces reduce infiltration and increase heat islands.
Final: 61.98 / 100

💡 Night-time Lights: Night-time Lights Formula

Formula: Score = min(100, (Avg Radiance / 50) * 100)
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Avg Radiance26.08Scale 0-50Higher indicates activity
Higher night radiance generally tracks electrification and economic intensity.
Final: 52.16 / 100

🏞️ Water Bodies: Water Bodies Score Formula

Formula: Score = (Permanent Water Score * 70%) + (Seasonal Water Score * 30%)
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Permanent water31.26%70%Scaled against 10% benchmark
Seasonal water48.16%30%Scaled against 20% benchmark
Permanent water has higher score weight than seasonal water.
Final: 100.00 / 100

👥 Population Density: Population Density Formula

Formula: Score = ((20000 - density_per_km²) / 20000) * 100, clipped to [0,100]
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Density3,984.0 /km²Inverse scaleLower density -> higher score
This follows the Livability PopulationDensity model.
Final: 80.08 / 100

⛲ Groundwater: Groundwater Score Formula

Formula: Weighted: Soil Moisture 30% + Recharge 25% + PDSI 20% + Trend 15% + Precipitation 10%
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Soil moisture136.27430%Scaled to 0-200
Recharge estimate1.1925%Scaled -200 to +400
PDSI3.0120%Scaled -4 to +4
SM trend0.000015%Scaled -50 to +50
Precipitation1,866.0110%Scaled 800 to 1800
Exactly reused from Livability Groundwater model logic.
Final: 63.85 / 100

🌧️ Waterlogging: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🚶 Walkability & Safety: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

View full livability report for Magneto Zone →

Compliance Status

RERA registration, filings, and compliance flags based on public CG-RERA records.

Compliance Status Based on public CG-RERA records
4 Passed
2 N/A
RERA Registration Active
Reg No. PCGRERA010722001452 — Status: Ongoing
Section 3 · Source · RERA Official Page
No RERA Orders
No complaints or orders found against this project
Sec 38–63 · Source
No Orders in Last 12 Months
Clean record — no complaints or orders filed
Source
Within Timeline
Target completion: 27 Feb 2027
Section 4 · Source
Quarterly Updates Not Available
No compliance snapshot data on record
Section 11 · Source
Annual Audit Not Available
No compliance snapshot data on record
Section 4(2)(l)(D) · Source
Each check is based on publicly available CG-RERA portal data as of Apr 2026. How this works →
Other Projects by Same Promoter (4)
ProjectRERA No.StatusDistrictType
aishwarya empire PCGRERA050618000030 Ongoing Raipur Mixed Development
aishwarya empire phase - i PCGRERA050618000025 Ongoing Raipur Residential Development
aishwarya empire phase - iii PCGRERA010722001453 Ongoing Raipur Residential Development
aishwarya empire phase - v PCGRERA010722001454 Ongoing Raipur Residential Development

Details

Registration, professional team, bank, promoters, and compliance history.

Registration Details
RERA Number
PCGRERA010722001452
Status
Ongoing
Project Type
Residential Development
EWS Category
NO
Construction Cost
₹ 89071000
Land Cost
₹ 6681000
Proposed Completion
27 Feb 2027
Authorised Person
nikhil kumar dhagat
Website
www.aishwaryagroup.co
View on Map
Professional Team
RoleNameLicense / Membership
Quarterly CA PRATIK PRADEEP UMALE 438913
Engineer YOGESH KUMAR BANI 848/2017
Architect NEENA SHRIVASTAV CA-97-21878
Promoters
S
sankalp homes Partnership Firm

Legal Orders & Cases

RERA legal orders, complaints, and case statistics filed against this project.

Legal Orders (0)
ComplaintApplicantSectionDateSourcePDF
No orders found for this project.

Location

Project address, coordinates, and nearby places.

Location Details
Address
VILLAGE - LABHANDIH ,TEHSIL & DIST - RAIPUR
District
Raipur
Tehsil
Raipur
Coordinates
21.2489601, 81.6913706 View on Map
Neighborhood Intelligence

Explore nearby infrastructure around this project. Toggle categories to show/hide on the map.

Neighborhood Map 3 km radius
RERA Projects Near aishwarya empire phase - iv 30 found within 3 km
# Project District Status Distance
1 aishwarya empire phase - iii Raipur Ongoing 0.02 km
2 aishwarya empire Raipur Ongoing 0.04 km
3 aishwarya empire phase - i Raipur Ongoing 0.05 km
4 aishwarya empire phase - v Raipur Ongoing 0.06 km
5 PPMAY OF 203(DUS)) AT LABHANDI RAIPUR Raipur Ongoing 0.19 km
6 pmay of 112(560) dus at labhandi raipur Raipur Ongoing 0.28 km
7 CLOUD 9 BLOCK - A Raipur Ongoing 0.39 km
8 CLOUD 9 BLOCK - B Raipur Ongoing 0.46 km
9 MAGNETO SIGNATURE HOMES -II APARTMENT Raipur New 0.64 km
10 a. mittal avenue Raipur Ongoing 0.64 km
11 COMMERCIAL COMPLEX (C 1) ANANDAM WORLD CITY Raipur Ongoing 0.65 km
12 magneto signature homes - ii Raipur Ongoing 0.67 km
13 ALAYA PLOTS, ANANDAM WORLD CITY Raipur Ongoing 0.67 km
14 PMAY OF (232DUS) AT LABHANDI ,RAIPUR Raipur Ongoing 0.68 km
15 park serene Raipur Ongoing 0.68 km
16 shanti nagar Raipur New 0.69 km
17 ARSHIYA APARTMENT (M2), MIRAYA APARTMENT (M3) Raipur Ongoing 0.71 km
18 august silver moon Raipur New 0.77 km
19 SAMPOORNA HOMES (PHASE-I) Raipur New 0.81 km
20 ANANDA PLOTS ,ANANDAM WORLD CITY ,RAIPUR Raipur New 0.82 km
21 AASTHA APARTMENT (M7) PHASE-I ANANDAM WORLD CITY Raipur Ongoing 0.85 km
22 SAMRIDDHI ALTUS Raipur New 0.95 km
23 ambience nature phase ii Raipur New 0.97 km
24 AMBIENCE NATURE Raipur New 0.97 km
25 sunita park phase 1 Raipur Ongoing 1.04 km
26 METRO HEXA Raipur New 1.05 km
27 SURYODAYA WONDER 16 Raipur New 1.07 km
28 the address Raipur New 1.08 km
29 The riCHmond park Raipur New 1.23 km
30 srishtis imperia phase-1 Raipur New 1.28 km

Buyer Checklist

Documents and verifications a buyer should review before purchase.

Buyer Document Verification Checklist

Key documents a buyer should verify before purchasing in this project. Items marked Available have data on Seemankan.

5/14 verified
  • RERA Registration Certificate Available
    Confirms the project is registered with RERA CG. Verify registration number, validity dates, and project details on the RERA portal.
    RERA No: PCGRERA010722001452
    View on RERA Portal
  • Promoter Registration Certificate Verify Independently
    Builder / colonizer company registration certificate. Confirms the promoter entity is a registered firm, company, or society.
  • Approved Building / Sanction Plan Verify Independently
    Building plan sanctioned by the local authority. Verify floor count, setbacks, and FSI compliance.
  • Layout Plan Verify Independently
    Approved layout showing plot divisions, roads, open spaces, and common areas.
  • Title Deed / Ownership Proof Verify Independently
    Proof that the promoter legally owns the land. Verify via Sub-Registrar records.
  • Encumbrance Certificate Verify Independently
    Confirms the property is free from legal dues, mortgages, or liens. Obtain from Sub-Registrar office.
  • Land Use / Diversion Certificate Verify Independently
    Required if land was converted from agricultural to non-agricultural use.
  • Architect Certificate Available
    Certification from a registered architect confirming structural plans and compliance.
    View View View +2 more
  • Structural Engineer Certificate Available
    Certification from a structural engineer confirming building safety and load-bearing capacity.
    View View View +2 more
  • CA Financial Certificate Available
    Chartered Accountant certificate on financial status, project cost estimates, and fund utilization.
    View View View +2 more
  • Commencement Certificate Verify Independently
    Permission to begin construction issued by the local authority after plan approval.
  • NOCs (No Objection Certificates) Verify Independently
    NOCs from fire department, environment, water supply, electricity board, and other authorities.
  • Project Brochure / Specification Available
    Official brochure with unit types, amenities, and specifications. Compare with actual delivery.
    View View View +2 more
  • RERA Compliance Orders Verify Independently
    Check if any orders, penalties, or directions have been issued against this project by RERA.
Disclaimer: This checklist is for informational purposes only. "Available" means Seemankan has a copy from the RERA portal — it does not constitute legal verification. Always verify original documents with the concerned authorities and consult a legal advisor before making a purchase decision.

Risk Zone Within 5 km

Buffer zones (water bodies, airport restrictions) and risk sites (landfills, waste processing) detected within 3 km (immediate) and 5 km (extended) of the project.

16
Risk zones (within 5 km)
3 km: 2 3–5 km: 13
13
Water bodies (river/nala/lake)
3 km: 2 3–5 km: 11
2
Landfill / waste sites
3 km: 0 3–5 km: 2
1
Airport buffer overlap
3 km: 0 3–5 km: 0
Risk Zone Map (3 km & 5 km rings) Project marker centered
Water Bodies (13)
  • Heerapur Talab ≤3 km
    Pond · 50m buffer
    1.82 km
  • Kharun Left Bank Canal ≤3 km
    Canal · 20m buffer
    2.26 km
  • Telibandha Nala 3–5 km
    Nala · 20m buffer
    3.17 km
  • Mahanadi Main Canal 3–5 km
    Canal · 100m buffer
    3.22 km
  • Dunda Talab 3–5 km
    Pond · 50m buffer
    3.37 km
  • Telibandha Talab (Marine Drive) 3–5 km
    Lake · 50m buffer
    3.53 km
  • Kharun River 3–5 km
    River · 75m buffer
    3.77 km
  • Muktangan Talab 3–5 km
    Tank · 50m buffer
    3.82 km
Landfill / Waste Sites (2)
  • SLRM Centre Tendua (Tundra) 3–5 km
    Waste processing · 200m buffer
    3.2 km
  • Daldal Seoni MSW Transfer Station 3–5 km
    Transfer station · 100m buffer
    3.39 km
Airport (1)
  • Swami Vivekananda Airport 5–10 km
    RPR / VARP · DGCA height limits apply
    9.07 km

Reviews

Verified buyer reviews and ratings for this project.

No reviews yet. Be the first to review this project!

Login to Write a Review

You need to be signed in to submit a review for this project.

Login or Register