Home / RERA Projects / RAHEJA GREEN
ONGOING Plotted Development RERA Page Project Website
GENERATE REPORT

RAHEJA GREEN

Compliance Status
Partial Compliance
21.2621, 81.7314 Explore area
District
Raipur
Area
—
Promoter
PIRDA DEVELOPERS
Project Information
Promoter PIRDA DEVELOPERS
Type Plotted Development
Status Ongoing
Completion 31 Dec 2018
RERA No. PCGRERA220618000291
Registered 22 Jun 2018
Original End 31 Dec 2018
EWS Category NO
Construction Cost ₹ 107290000
Land Cost ₹ 78095000
Authorised Person deepak raheja
Address village- pirda, raipur (c.g.)
At a Glance
-
Total Units
-
Units Sold
-
Unsold
0
Legal Cases
Dec 2018
Target Completion
100%
Completion
Amenities & Facilities (16)
BOUNDARY WALL
100%
COMMUNITY BUILDINGS
100%
COMMUNITY BUILDINGS/ CLUB HOUSE
100%
ELECTRIC METER ROOM,SUB STATION,RECIEVING STATIOM
100%
ENERGY MAANAGEMENT
100%
INTERNAL ROADS AND FOOTPATHS
100%
LANDSCAPING AND TREE PLANTING
100%
OPEN PARKING
100%
SECURITY SERVICE
100%
SEWERAGE
100%
SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT AND DISPOSAL
100%
STORM WATER DRAINS
100%
STREET LIGHTING
100%
TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL OF SEWERAGE AND SULLAGE WAT
100%
WATER CONSERVATION RAIN WATER HARVESTING
100%
WATER SUPPLY
100%
Project Professionals
SHAILESH GANGWANI
STATUTORY CA
SHEETAL SURANA
QUARTERLY CA
RAJENDRA JAIN
ENGINEER
MAHENDRA KUMAR MARTANDAY
ARCHITECT
Project Analysis

360° Project Intelligence

Comprehensive analysis across regulatory, livability, market, filing activity, and market readiness dimensions.

Regulatory
79
11 of 14 checks · Moderate Signals
Livability
58
Labhandih · Moderate Signals
Legal
0
No legal orders on record · 30 nearby
Filing Activity
161
131 docs · 30 quarterly updates
Market Readiness
35
Ongoing · due Dec 2018
Area Livability

Livability of Labhandih

Eighteen environmental, infrastructure and amenity parameters for the nearest mapped area (Labhandih — 2.46 km from this project). Click any parameter for the underlying readings, thresholds and what they mean.



🏠 Livability Parameters

Latest readings for Labhandih. Only parameters with available data are shown below. Based on the latest readings for Labhandih.

C
Composite Score
57.9 /100
Average

🌬️ Air Quality

Final Score: 99.6/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Air Quality?AQI summarizes PM2.5, PM10 and gases. Lower pollution values improve public health outcomes.
AQI
51
Satisfactory
PM2.5
31.0 µg/m³
≤ 40
PM10
58.9 µg/m³
≤ 60
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
PM2.5 31.0 µg/m³ ≤ 40
Good
PM10 58.9 µg/m³ ≤ 60
Good
NO₂ 13.0 µg/m³ ≤ 40
Good
💡 What does this mean for you?Cleaner air lowers respiratory burden and improves outdoor comfort.

💧 Water Quality

Final Score: 74.8/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Water Quality?Water quality combines chemistry, supply duration and contamination markers.
TDS
459 ppm
≤ 500
pH
7.01
6.5–8.5
Supply
5.8 hr/day
≥ 8 hr
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
TDS 459 ppm ≤ 500
Good
Fluoride 0.90 mg/L ≤ 1.0
Good
Turbidity 6.9 NTU ≤ 1
Concern
💡 What does this mean for you?Better supply quality and consistency reduces dependence on tanker/groundwater fallback.

🧹 Sanitation

Final Score: 55.5/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Sanitation?Sanitation reflects ODF status, sewage treatment and waste management regularity.
ODF
ODF+
ODF++
Sewage Coverage
40%
≥ 80%
Drainage
50%
≥ 90%
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
ODF Status ODF+ ODF++
Info
Sewage Coverage 40% ≥ 80%
Concern
Drainage Coverage 50% ≥ 90%
Concern
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher sanitation maturity lowers disease exposure and neighborhood nuisance.

🛣️ Infrastructure

Final Score: 44.4/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Infrastructure?Infrastructure score combines land use, urbanization, built form, night lights and terrain indicators.
Built-up
14.3%
Balanced band
Tree Cover
7.6%
≥ 15%
Urbanization
55.3
Higher better
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Built-up (LULC) 14.3% 40-70%
Contextual
Impervious Surface 10.6% < 70%
Good
NDVI Mean 0.320 > 0.3
Good
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Built-up (LULC) % 17.0% 11.6% 14.3%
Tree Cover % 6.0% 9.2% 7.6%
Urbanization Index 55.3 55.3 55.3
Infra Score 45.8 43.1 44.4
💡 What does this mean for you?Balanced built + green mix usually improves long-term livability resilience.

🏥 Amenities

Final Score: 67.8/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Amenities?Amenity score captures daily-access services in walk/short-drive radii.
Hospitals 500m
2
Target ≥1
Schools 1km
4
Target ≥3
Parks 500m
0
Target ≥1
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Hospitals (500m) 2 ≥1
Good
Schools (1km) 4 ≥3
Good
Markets (1km) 14 ≥1
Good
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher local amenity density improves convenience and walkability.

🌳 Green Cover

Final Score: 31.9/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Green Cover?NDVI and vegetation structure are measured from satellite imagery to estimate neighborhood greenery.
NDVI Mean
0.200
Greenness index
Vegetation
27.6%
% green pixels
Dense Green
11.5%
Thick canopy
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
NDVI Mean 0.200 0.5 maps to score 100
Weighted 40%
Vegetation % 27.6% Direct % (cap 100)
Weighted 30%
Dense Green % 11.5% Scaled from 50%
Weighted 20%
Parks within 500m 0 Count * 33 (cap 100)
Weighted 10%
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
NDVI Mean 0.159 0.241 0.200
Vegetation % 27.4% 27.8% 27.6%
Dense Green % 12.3% 10.6% 11.5%
Tree Canopy % 15.0% 20.7% 17.9%
Green Score 25.9 31.9 28.9
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher green metrics typically reduce heat stress and improve comfort.

🔊 Noise

Final Score: 51.6/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Noise?Noise uses measured day/night dB compared to CPCB zone limits.
Day dB
61.2
vs CPCB day limit
Night dB
53.2
vs CPCB night limit
Zone
commercial
CPCB class
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Day Noise 61.2 dB ≤ 65.0 dB
Good
Night Noise 53.2 dB ≤ 55.0 dB
Good
Nearest Highway 81 m Higher usually quieter
Info
💡 What does this mean for you?Chronic high noise impacts stress, sleep quality and perceived comfort.

🌊 Flood Risk

Final Score: 70.0/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Flood Risk?Flood risk combines river exposure and local waterlogging vulnerability.
Overall Risk
Highest
Lower is safer
River Risk
High
Lower is safer
Waterlogging
High
Lower is safer
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Overall Risk Highest Low preferred
Info
River Flood Risk High Low preferred
Info
Waterlogging Risk High Low preferred
Info
💡 What does this mean for you?Lower flood risk means less disruption and lower hazard exposure.

🏚️ Earthquake Risk

Final Score: 25.0/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Earthquake Risk?Earthquake profile uses seismic zone, PGA and soil/liquefaction risk factors.
Seismic Zone
Zone II
Lower risk zone preferred
Risk Level
Low-Medium
Low preferred
Liquefaction
Medium
Low preferred
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Seismic Zone Zone II II preferred
Info
Risk Level Low-Medium Low preferred
Info
PGA (475yr) 0.0155g Lower preferred
Info
💡 What does this mean for you?Lower seismic hazard reduces structural and insurance risk exposure.

🌡️ Land Surface Temp

Final Score: 68.3/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Land Surface Temp?Land Surface Temperature reflects heat-island intensity from satellite thermal bands.
LST Mean
27.9°C
Lower better
LST Min
-7.5°C
Context
LST Max
39.9°C
Lower better
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
LST Mean 27.9°C 20°C best / 45°C worst
Weighted by formula
LST Score 68.3 0-100
Computed
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
LST Mean (°C) 27.9 28.0 27.9
LST Min (°C) -8.7 -6.4 -7.5
LST Max (°C) 39.8 39.9 39.9
LST Score 68.6 68.0 68.3
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher heat exposure affects comfort, cooling load and health risk.

🏗️ Built-up Density

Final Score: 85.7/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Built-up Density?Built-up density measures extent of developed surface versus open space.
Built-up %
14.3%
Lower better
Open Space %
85.7%
Higher better
Built-up Score
85.7
0-100
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Built-up % 14.3% Inverse scoring
Score = 100 - builtup%
Open Space % 85.7% Context
Info
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Built-up % 17.0% 11.6% 14.3%
Open Space % 83.0% 88.5% 85.7%
Built-up Score 83.0 88.5 85.7
💡 What does this mean for you?Very high built-up often raises heat and runoff while reducing open environmental buffers.

💡 Night-time Lights

Final Score: 29.4/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Night-time Lights?Nighttime lights are a proxy for economic activity and electrification intensity.
Avg Radiance
14.70
Higher better
Max Radiance
23.98
Context
NTL Score
29.4
0-100
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Avg Radiance 14.70 Scaled to 50
Score = min(100, avg/50*100)
NTL Score 29.4 0-100
Computed
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Avg Radiance 16.32 13.08 14.70
Max Radiance 27.06 20.90 23.98
NTL Score 32.7 26.2 29.4
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher radiance often indicates stronger urban activity but can correlate with light pollution.

🏞️ Water Bodies

Final Score: 65.0/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Water Bodies?Water-bodies score reflects permanent and seasonal water presence in the analysis radius.
Permanent Water
34.19%
Higher generally better
Seasonal Water
87.32%
Context
Water Score
100.0
0-100
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Permanent Water % 34.19% 70% weight
Scaled against 10%
Seasonal Water % 87.32% 30% weight
Scaled against 20%
Water Score 100.0 0-100
Computed
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Permanent Water % 0.00% 68.38% 34.19%
Seasonal Water % 78.64% 96.00% 87.32%
Water Score 30.0 100.0 100.0
💡 What does this mean for you?Water presence can support cooling, recharge and ecological quality.

👥 Population Density

Final Score: 93.3/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Population Density?Population density indicates urban crowding pressure around the area.
Population
20,815
Estimated residents
Density/km²
1,344.6
Lower better for this score
Score
93.3
0-100
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Density/km² 1,344.6 Inverse scale up to 20,000
Lower -> higher score
Score 93.3 0-100
Computed
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Population Total 4,300 37,329 20,815
Density / km² 1,368.8 1,320.3 1,344.6
Pop Density Score 93.2 93.4 93.3
💡 What does this mean for you?Extremely high density can increase pressure on services and mobility.

⛲ Groundwater

Final Score: 64.1/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Groundwater?Groundwater score combines moisture, recharge, drought and trend indicators.
Soil Moisture
138.142
Higher better
Recharge
0.98
Higher better
PDSI
2.99
Higher better
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Soil Moisture 138.142 30% weight
Scaled
Recharge 0.98 25% weight
Scaled
PDSI 2.99 20% weight
Scaled
SM Trend 0.0000 15% weight
Scaled
Precipitation 1,854.67 10% weight
Scaled
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Soil Moisture 138.589 137.695 138.142
Recharge Estimate 0.90 1.07 0.98
PDSI 2.98 3.01 2.99
Groundwater Score 64.1 64.1 64.1
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher score suggests better long-term aquifer and moisture support conditions.

🌧️ Waterlogging

↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Waterlogging?Waterlogging combines topography, imperviousness and wetness indices across nearby grid cells.
Grid Count
175
Sampled cells
Avg Susceptibility
47.6
Lower is safer
High Risk Grids
49
High / Very High
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTargetStatus
Avg Susceptibility 47.6 < 40
Concern
Avg Slope 2.46° > 1°
Good
Avg Impervious 9.6% < 70%
Good
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher susceptibility and low slope increase monsoon water stagnation probability.

🚶 Walkability & Safety

↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Walkability & Safety?OSM amenity metrics reflect pedestrian, safety and urban accessibility infrastructure.
Footpaths
0
Higher better
Street Lamps
0
Higher better
Police/Fire Access
0
Presence
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Footpaths (500m) 0 ≥ 3
Concern
Sidewalk Roads (1km) 0 ≥ 5
Concern
Nearest Police Station — m ≤ 2000m
Context
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher OSM accessibility/safety features generally improve everyday livability.

⚠️ Risk Factors

↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Risk Factors?Nearby hazards and sensitive risk points mapped around this area.
Total Risks
6
Mapped points
Scoring Breakdown
CategoryRiskDistance / SeverityMeaning
Infrastructure No Sewer Network - Labhandih 0 m / High Entire area depends on septic tanks, no underground sewerage
Water_drainage Borewell-Dependent Water Supply 0 m / High No municipal piped water, residents rely on private borewells
Accessibility Hospital Access >20min Drive 8000 m / High Nearest major hospital is 8+ km, >20 min during traffic
Safety_social Isolated Dark Stretches at Night 200 m / Medium Peripheral location with poor lighting and low foot traffic after dark
Land_zoning Unplanned Colony Development 300 m / Medium Several colonies developed without proper layout approval
Environmental Roadside Dumping - Labhandih Highway 500 m / Medium Unregulated waste dumping along highway approach road
💡 What does this mean for you?Closer and severe risks can affect insurance, resale and safety comfort.

🌬️ Air Quality: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

💧 Water Quality: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🧹 Sanitation: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🛣️ Infrastructure: Infrastructure Score Formula

Formula: Composite weighted model from GHSL/ESA/VIIRS/Terrain features
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Urbanization index55.2920%SMOD
Built-up balance14.3%15%Best in moderate band
NTL stability64.0%15%Power/activity consistency
Avg building height1.71 m10%Vertical infra proxy
Impervious %10.6%10%Moderate is optimal
Radiance14.5310%Development proxy
Slope0.10°10%Flatter is better
Green support7.6%10%Tree + grass contribution
This is the same weighted structure used in Livability Infrastructure model.
Final: 44.43 / 100

🏥 Amenities: Amenity Score Breakdown

Formula: Each amenity category is capped at 100, final score is averaged across categories
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Hospitals 500m2 * 33Cap 100Health access
Schools 1km4 * 20Cap 100Education access
Markets 1km14 * 33Cap 100Daily needs
Parks 500m0 * 33Cap 100Open space
Transit 1km0 * 50Cap 100Mobility
Category multipliers mirror the Livability snapshot logic.
Final: Final from amenity_scores table

🌳 Green Cover: Green Score Formula

Formula: Score = (NDVI*40%) + (Vegetation*30%) + (Dense Green*20%) + (Parks*10%)
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
NDVI component0.200 => 40.040%16.0
Vegetation component27.6% => 27.630%8.3
Dense green component11.5% => 23.020%4.6
Parks component0 => 0.010%0.0
This matches the Livability GreenCover model weighting logic.
Final: 28.86 / 100

🔊 Noise: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🌊 Flood Risk: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🏚️ Earthquake Risk: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🌡️ Land Surface Temp: LST Score Formula

Formula: Score = ((45 - LST Mean) / 25) * 100, clipped to [0,100]
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
LST Mean27.93 °CReference20°C best, 45°C worst
Lower land surface temperature means better livability.
Final: 68.28 / 100

🏗️ Built-up Density: Built-up Score Formula

Formula: Score = 100 - Built-up %
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Built-up %14.3%InverseLower is better
Dense concrete surfaces reduce infiltration and increase heat islands.
Final: 85.71 / 100

💡 Night-time Lights: Night-time Lights Formula

Formula: Score = min(100, (Avg Radiance / 50) * 100)
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Avg Radiance14.70Scale 0-50Higher indicates activity
Higher night radiance generally tracks electrification and economic intensity.
Final: 29.40 / 100

🏞️ Water Bodies: Water Bodies Score Formula

Formula: Score = (Permanent Water Score * 70%) + (Seasonal Water Score * 30%)
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Permanent water34.19%70%Scaled against 10% benchmark
Seasonal water87.32%30%Scaled against 20% benchmark
Permanent water has higher score weight than seasonal water.
Final: 100.00 / 100

👥 Population Density: Population Density Formula

Formula: Score = ((20000 - density_per_km²) / 20000) * 100, clipped to [0,100]
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Density1,344.6 /km²Inverse scaleLower density -> higher score
This follows the Livability PopulationDensity model.
Final: 93.28 / 100

⛲ Groundwater: Groundwater Score Formula

Formula: Weighted: Soil Moisture 30% + Recharge 25% + PDSI 20% + Trend 15% + Precipitation 10%
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Soil moisture138.14230%Scaled to 0-200
Recharge estimate0.9825%Scaled -200 to +400
PDSI2.9920%Scaled -4 to +4
SM trend0.000015%Scaled -50 to +50
Precipitation1,854.6710%Scaled 800 to 1800
Exactly reused from Livability Groundwater model logic.
Final: 64.08 / 100

🌧️ Waterlogging: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🚶 Walkability & Safety: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

⚠️ Risk Factors: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

View full livability report for Labhandih →

Compliance Status

RERA registration, filings, and compliance flags based on public CG-RERA records.

Compliance Status Based on public CG-RERA records
3 Passed
1 Issue(s)
2 N/A
RERA Registration Active
Reg No. PCGRERA220618000291 — Status: Ongoing
Section 3 · Source · View Certificate · RERA Official Page
No RERA Orders
No complaints or orders found against this project
Sec 38–63 · Source
No Orders in Last 12 Months
Clean record — no complaints or orders filed
Source
Completion Overdue
Was due 31 Dec 2018 — overdue by ~89 month(s)
Section 4 · Source
Quarterly Updates Not Available
No compliance snapshot data on record
Section 11 · Source
Annual Audit Not Available
No compliance snapshot data on record
Section 4(2)(l)(D) · Source
Each check is based on publicly available CG-RERA portal data as of May 2026. How this works →
Other Projects by Same Promoter (1)
ProjectRERA No.StatusDistrictType
raheja green phase-2 PCGRERA061020001150 New Raipur Residential Plotted Development

Details

Registration, professional team, bank, promoters, and compliance history.

Registration Details
RERA Number
PCGRERA220618000291
Status
Ongoing
Project Type
Plotted Development
Approved Date
22 Jun 2018
Original End Date
31 Dec 2018
EWS Category
NO
Construction Cost
₹ 107290000
Land Cost
₹ 78095000
Proposed Completion
31 Dec 2018
Authorised Person
deepak raheja
View on Map
Professional Team
RoleNameLicense / Membership
Statutory CA shailesh gangwani 424577
Quarterly CA SHEETAL SURANA 429902
Engineer Rajendra Jain 330/98
Architect Mahendra Kumar Martanday 668/2014
Promoters
P
pirda developers Partnership Firm

Legal Orders & Cases

RERA legal orders, complaints, and case statistics filed against this project.

Legal Orders (0)
ComplaintApplicantSectionDateSourcePDF
No orders found for this project.

Location

Project address, coordinates, and nearby places.

Location Details
Address
village- pirda, raipur (c.g.)
District
Raipur
Tehsil
Raipur
Coordinates
21.2620726, 81.7314496 View on Map
Area Livability

Livability of Labhandih Raipur

Environmental, infrastructure & amenity parameters for the area where this project is located (2.46 km from project). Each value is compared with the Raipur average.

Composite Livability Score
57.9 / 100
Grade C · Average
-0.4 vs Raipur avg (58.3)
Air Quality
99.6 Excellent
Area
100
City
89
+10.6 vs city avg
Water Quality
74.8 Good
Area
75
City
68
+6.9 vs city avg
Sanitation
55.5 Average
Area
56
City
56
-0.5 vs city avg
Green Cover
31.9 Poor
Area
32
City
39
-6.6 vs city avg
Noise Level
51.6 Average
Area
52
City
58
-6.2 vs city avg
Infrastructure
44.4 Below Avg
Area
44
City
76
-31.8 vs city avg
Amenities
67.8 Good
Area
68
City
82
-14.0 vs city avg
Flood Safety
70.0 Good
Area
70
City
38
+31.9 vs city avg
Earthquake Safety
25.0 Poor
Area
25
City
15
+10.4 vs city avg
Land Surface Temp.
68.3 Good
Area
68
City
58
+10.5 vs city avg
Built-up Density
85.7 Excellent
Area
86
City
35
+50.9 vs city avg
Night-light Activity
29.4 Poor
Area
29
City
55
-25.3 vs city avg
Water Bodies Nearby
65.0 Good
Area
65
City
93
-27.7 vs city avg
Population Density
93.3 Excellent
Area
93
City
68
+25.4 vs city avg
Groundwater Status
64.1 Average
Area
64
City
63
+0.7 vs city avg
View detailed livability report for Labhandih
Neighborhood Intelligence

Explore nearby infrastructure around this project. Toggle categories to show/hide on the map.

Neighborhood Map 3 km radius
RERA Projects Near raheja green 30 found within 3 km
# Project District Status Distance
1 NEW RAIPUR RESIDENCY Raipur Ongoing 0.41 km
2 smart nutown Raipur Ongoing 0.62 km
3 raheja green phase-2 Raipur New 0.63 km
4 rOSEBEY GREENS Raipur Ongoing 0.90 km
5 PMAY OF870 (DUS) AT KACHNA RAIPUR Raipur Ongoing 0.98 km
6 PMAY OF 754(DUS)AT KACHANA RAIPUR Raipur Ongoing 1.03 km
7 PMAY OF 232 DUS AT JAINAM INFA ,KACHANA RAIPUR Raipur Ongoing 1.08 km
8 PMAY OF 1044 (DUS) AT KACHNA RAIPUR Raipur Ongoing 1.26 km
9 rosebey greens extention Raipur New 1.27 km
10 ambara Raipur New 1.42 km
11 galaxy nu town Raipur Ongoing 1.54 km
12 raheja nirwana Raipur New 1.55 km
13 V V VALLEY Raipur New 1.57 km
14 CLASSIC CASTLE Raipur New 1.63 km
15 INDRA PRASTHA Raipur Ongoing 1.66 km
16 Raheja Nirwana Phase-2 Raipur New 1.78 km
17 pmay of 261 dus at amulaiya realcom kachna ,raipur Raipur Ongoing 1.90 km
18 pmay of 261 dus at sumeet infra ,kachana ,raipur Raipur Ongoing 1.91 km
19 AMULYAM GREENS Raipur New 1.92 km
20 RAHEJA NIRWANA PHASE-3 Raipur New 2.00 km
21 SWARNABHOOMI PROJECT PHASE-03 Raipur New 2.01 km
22 anand bhoomi phase- 02 Raipur New 2.18 km
23 AMULYAM GREENS EXTENSION Raipur New 2.19 km
24 SWARNABHOOMI PROJECT PHASE-II Raipur Ongoing 2.32 km
25 Extension of GAlaxy Premium Raipur New 2.43 km
26 RAMA WORLD EXTENSION Raipur New 2.46 km
27 galaxy greens Raipur New 2.52 km
28 GALAXY PREMIUM Raipur Ongoing 2.53 km
29 RAMA WORLD Raipur New 2.54 km
30 GALAXY NU-TOWN KURUD Raipur New 2.54 km

Buyer Checklist

Documents and verifications a buyer should review before purchase.

Buyer Document Verification Checklist

Key documents a buyer should verify before purchasing in this project. Items marked Available have data on Seemankan.

10/14 verified
  • RERA Registration Certificate Available
    Confirms the project is registered with RERA CG. Verify registration number, validity dates, and project details on the RERA portal.
    RERA No: PCGRERA220618000291
    View Certificate View on RERA Portal
  • Promoter Registration Certificate Available
    Builder / colonizer company registration certificate. Confirms the promoter entity is a registered firm, company, or society.
    Preview
  • Approved Building / Sanction Plan Verify Independently
    Building plan sanctioned by the local authority. Verify floor count, setbacks, and FSI compliance.
  • Layout Plan Available
    Approved layout showing plot divisions, roads, open spaces, and common areas.
    Preview
  • Title Deed / Ownership Proof Available
    Proof that the promoter legally owns the land. Verify via Sub-Registrar records.
    Preview
  • Encumbrance Certificate Available
    Confirms the property is free from legal dues, mortgages, or liens. Obtain from Sub-Registrar office.
    Preview
  • Land Use / Diversion Certificate Verify Independently
    Required if land was converted from agricultural to non-agricultural use.
  • Architect Certificate Available
    Certification from a registered architect confirming structural plans and compliance.
    View View View +6 more
  • Structural Engineer Certificate Available
    Certification from a structural engineer confirming building safety and load-bearing capacity.
    View View View +6 more
  • CA Financial Certificate Available
    Chartered Accountant certificate on financial status, project cost estimates, and fund utilization.
    Preview View View +9 more
  • Commencement Certificate Available
    Permission to begin construction issued by the local authority after plan approval.
    Download Download Download +3 more
  • NOCs (No Objection Certificates) Verify Independently
    NOCs from fire department, environment, water supply, electricity board, and other authorities.
  • Project Brochure / Specification Available
    Official brochure with unit types, amenities, and specifications. Compare with actual delivery.
    Preview Preview
  • RERA Compliance Orders Verify Independently
    Check if any orders, penalties, or directions have been issued against this project by RERA.
Disclaimer: This checklist is for informational purposes only. "Available" means Seemankan has a copy from the RERA portal — it does not constitute legal verification. Always verify original documents with the concerned authorities and consult a legal advisor before making a purchase decision.

Risk Zone Within 5 km

Buffer zones (water bodies, airport restrictions) and risk sites (landfills, waste processing) detected within 3 km (immediate) and 5 km (extended) of the project.

1
Risk zones (within 5 km)
3 km: 0 3–5 km: 0
0
Water bodies (river/nala/lake)
3 km: 0 3–5 km: 0
0
Landfill / waste sites
3 km: 0 3–5 km: 0
1
Airport buffer overlap
3 km: 0 3–5 km: 0
Risk Zone Map (3 km & 5 km rings) Project marker centered
Airport (1)
  • Swami Vivekananda Airport 5–10 km
    RPR / VARP · DGCA height limits apply
    9.11 km

Reviews

Verified buyer reviews and ratings for this project.

No reviews yet. Be the first to review this project!

Login to Write a Review

You need to be signed in to submit a review for this project.

Login or Register