RealEstateIQTM
IN हिन्दी
Login Sign Up Free
Want a full project intelligence report? Download a detailed PDF report — RERA compliance, promoter, financials, amenities, location & risk.
Generate Project Report
Home / RERA Projects / KEWALYA PARK
ONGOING Residential Development RERA Page Project Website
GENERATE REPORT

KEWALYA PARK

Compliance Status
Partial Compliance
21.2439, 81.5233 Explore area
District
Durg
Area
—
Promoter
KEWALYA PARK
Project Information
Promoter KEWALYA PARK
Type Residential Development
Status Ongoing
Completion 30 Dec 2023
RERA No. PCGRERA230618000301
Registered 23 Jun 2018
Original End 30 Mar 2023
Total Units 1
EWS Category NO
Construction Cost ₹ 357405000
Land Cost ₹ 116517000
Authorised Person RAMCHAND KOTWANI
Website www.kaivalyapark.in
Address WARD NO. 12, KUMHARI, DHAMDHA, DURG (C.G.)
At a Glance
1
Total Units
-
Units Sold
1
Unsold
1
Legal Cases
Dec 2023
Target Completion
100%
Completion
Amenities & Facilities (13)
BOUNDARY WALL
100%
ENERGY MAANAGEMENT
100%
INTERNAL ROADS AND FOOTPATHS
100%
LANDSCAPING AND TREE PLANTING
100%
OPEN PARKING
100%
SECURITY SERVICE
100%
SEWERAGE
100%
SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT AND DISPOSAL
100%
STORM WATER DRAINS
100%
STREET LIGHTING
100%
tample
100%
WATER CONSERVATION RAIN WATER HARVESTING
100%
WATER SUPPLY
100%
Project Professionals
MAYANK KEDIA
STATUTORY CA
PRAVEEN GOYAL
QUARTERLY CA
ER. RAJENDRA JAIN
ENGINEER
SHASHIKANT KUJUR
ARCHITECT
Project Analysis

360° Project Intelligence

Comprehensive analysis across regulatory, livability, market, filing activity, and market readiness dimensions.

Regulatory
93
13 of 14 checks · Strong Signals
Livability
60
Tatibandh · Moderate Signals
Legal
1
1 legal order(s) · 20 nearby
Filing Activity
578
515 docs · 63 quarterly updates
Market Readiness
0
Ongoing · due Dec 2023
Area Livability

Livability of Tatibandh

Eighteen environmental, infrastructure and amenity parameters for the nearest mapped area (Tatibandh — 5.78 km from this project). Click any parameter for the underlying readings, thresholds and what they mean.



🏠 Livability Parameters

Latest readings for Tatibandh. Only parameters with available data are shown below. Based on the latest readings for Tatibandh.

C
Composite Score
60.0 /100
Average

🌬️ Air Quality

Final Score: 96.8/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Air Quality?AQI summarizes PM2.5, PM10 and gases. Lower pollution values improve public health outcomes.
AQI
58
Satisfactory
PM2.5
28.5 µg/m³
≤ 40
PM10
71.3 µg/m³
≤ 60
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
PM2.5 28.5 µg/m³ ≤ 40
Good
PM10 71.3 µg/m³ ≤ 60
Concern
NO₂ 35.7 µg/m³ ≤ 40
Good
💡 What does this mean for you?Cleaner air lowers respiratory burden and improves outdoor comfort.

💧 Water Quality

Final Score: 76.3/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Water Quality?Water quality combines chemistry, supply duration and contamination markers.
TDS
366 ppm
≤ 500
pH
7.76
6.5–8.5
Supply
7.2 hr/day
≥ 8 hr
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
TDS 366 ppm ≤ 500
Good
Fluoride 0.79 mg/L ≤ 1.0
Good
Turbidity 5.0 NTU ≤ 1
Concern
💡 What does this mean for you?Better supply quality and consistency reduces dependence on tanker/groundwater fallback.

🧹 Sanitation

Final Score: 67.3/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Sanitation?Sanitation reflects ODF status, sewage treatment and waste management regularity.
ODF
ODF+
ODF++
Sewage Coverage
55%
≥ 80%
Drainage
65%
≥ 90%
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
ODF Status ODF+ ODF++
Info
Sewage Coverage 55% ≥ 80%
Concern
Drainage Coverage 65% ≥ 90%
Concern
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher sanitation maturity lowers disease exposure and neighborhood nuisance.

🛣️ Infrastructure

Final Score: 70.2/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Infrastructure?Infrastructure score combines land use, urbanization, built form, night lights and terrain indicators.
Built-up
51.6%
Balanced band
Tree Cover
12.1%
≥ 15%
Urbanization
91.8
Higher better
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Built-up (LULC) 51.6% 40-70%
Contextual
Impervious Surface 40.9% < 70%
Good
NDVI Mean 0.230 > 0.3
Concern
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Built-up (LULC) % 70.2% 33.0% 51.6%
Tree Cover % 6.5% 17.7% 12.1%
Urbanization Index 100.0 83.5 91.8
Infra Score 75.2 65.2 74.7
💡 What does this mean for you?Balanced built + green mix usually improves long-term livability resilience.

🏥 Amenities

Final Score: 100.0/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Amenities?Amenity score captures daily-access services in walk/short-drive radii.
Hospitals 500m
5
Target ≥1
Schools 1km
5
Target ≥3
Parks 500m
8
Target ≥1
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Hospitals (500m) 5 ≥1
Good
Schools (1km) 5 ≥3
Good
Markets (1km) 5 ≥1
Good
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher local amenity density improves convenience and walkability.

🌳 Green Cover

Final Score: 31.9/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Green Cover?NDVI and vegetation structure are measured from satellite imagery to estimate neighborhood greenery.
NDVI Mean
0.132
Greenness index
Vegetation
15.0%
% green pixels
Dense Green
5.8%
Thick canopy
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
NDVI Mean 0.132 0.5 maps to score 100
Weighted 40%
Vegetation % 15.0% Direct % (cap 100)
Weighted 30%
Dense Green % 5.8% Scaled from 50%
Weighted 20%
Parks within 500m 8 Count * 33 (cap 100)
Weighted 10%
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
NDVI Mean 0.104 0.159 0.132
Vegetation % 8.3% 21.6% 15.0%
Dense Green % 5.1% 6.6% 5.8%
Tree Canopy % 7.1% 10.2% 8.7%
Green Score 22.8 31.9 27.4
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher green metrics typically reduce heat stress and improve comfort.

🔊 Noise

Final Score: 70.0/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Noise?Noise uses measured day/night dB compared to CPCB zone limits.
Day dB
55.3
vs CPCB day limit
Night dB
50.3
vs CPCB night limit
Zone
commercial
CPCB class
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Day Noise 55.3 dB ≤ 65.0 dB
Good
Night Noise 50.3 dB ≤ 55.0 dB
Good
Nearest Highway 1,001 m Higher usually quieter
Info
💡 What does this mean for you?Chronic high noise impacts stress, sleep quality and perceived comfort.

🌊 Flood Risk

Final Score: 17.5/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Flood Risk?Flood risk combines river exposure and local waterlogging vulnerability.
Overall Risk
Low-Medium
Lower is safer
River Risk
Low-Medium
Lower is safer
Waterlogging
Low
Lower is safer
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Overall Risk Low-Medium Low preferred
Info
River Flood Risk Low-Medium Low preferred
Info
Waterlogging Risk Low Low preferred
Info
💡 What does this mean for you?Lower flood risk means less disruption and lower hazard exposure.

🏚️ Earthquake Risk

Final Score: 10.0/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Earthquake Risk?Earthquake profile uses seismic zone, PGA and soil/liquefaction risk factors.
Seismic Zone
Zone II
Lower risk zone preferred
Risk Level
Low
Low preferred
Liquefaction
None
Low preferred
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Seismic Zone Zone II II preferred
Info
Risk Level Low Low preferred
Info
PGA (475yr) 0.0155g Lower preferred
Info
💡 What does this mean for you?Lower seismic hazard reduces structural and insurance risk exposure.

🌡️ Land Surface Temp

Final Score: 55.2/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Land Surface Temp?Land Surface Temperature reflects heat-island intensity from satellite thermal bands.
LST Mean
31.2°C
Lower better
LST Min
20.7°C
Context
LST Max
41.5°C
Lower better
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
LST Mean 31.2°C 20°C best / 45°C worst
Weighted by formula
LST Score 55.2 0-100
Computed
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
LST Mean (°C) 31.7 30.7 31.2
LST Min (°C) 22.4 19.0 20.7
LST Max (°C) 42.1 40.8 41.5
LST Score 53.2 57.2 55.2
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher heat exposure affects comfort, cooling load and health risk.

🏗️ Built-up Density

Final Score: 48.4/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Built-up Density?Built-up density measures extent of developed surface versus open space.
Built-up %
51.6%
Lower better
Open Space %
48.4%
Higher better
Built-up Score
48.4
0-100
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Built-up % 51.6% Inverse scoring
Score = 100 - builtup%
Open Space % 48.4% Context
Info
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Built-up % 70.2% 33.0% 51.6%
Open Space % 29.9% 67.0% 48.4%
Built-up Score 29.9 67.0 48.4
💡 What does this mean for you?Very high built-up often raises heat and runoff while reducing open environmental buffers.

💡 Night-time Lights

Final Score: 39.6/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Night-time Lights?Nighttime lights are a proxy for economic activity and electrification intensity.
Avg Radiance
19.78
Higher better
Max Radiance
31.20
Context
NTL Score
39.6
0-100
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Avg Radiance 19.78 Scaled to 50
Score = min(100, avg/50*100)
NTL Score 39.6 0-100
Computed
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Avg Radiance 24.44 15.13 19.78
Max Radiance 39.05 23.35 31.20
NTL Score 48.9 30.3 39.6
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher radiance often indicates stronger urban activity but can correlate with light pollution.

🏞️ Water Bodies

Final Score: 100.0/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Water Bodies?Water-bodies score reflects permanent and seasonal water presence in the analysis radius.
Permanent Water
40.66%
Higher generally better
Seasonal Water
94.68%
Context
Water Score
100.0
0-100
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Permanent Water % 40.66% 70% weight
Scaled against 10%
Seasonal Water % 94.68% 30% weight
Scaled against 20%
Water Score 100.0 0-100
Computed
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Permanent Water % 34.27% 47.05% 40.66%
Seasonal Water % 94.41% 94.94% 94.68%
Water Score 100.0 100.0 100.0
💡 What does this mean for you?Water presence can support cooling, recharge and ecological quality.

👥 Population Density

Final Score: 76.2/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Population Density?Population density indicates urban crowding pressure around the area.
Population
58,099
Estimated residents
Density/km²
4,759.4
Lower better for this score
Score
76.2
0-100
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Density/km² 4,759.4 Inverse scale up to 20,000
Lower -> higher score
Score 76.2 0-100
Computed
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Population Total 19,117 97,081 58,099
Density / km² 6,085.3 3,433.5 4,759.4
Pop Density Score 69.6 82.8 76.2
💡 What does this mean for you?Extremely high density can increase pressure on services and mobility.

⛲ Groundwater

Final Score: 63.2/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Groundwater?Groundwater score combines moisture, recharge, drought and trend indicators.
Soil Moisture
130.254
Higher better
Recharge
3.44
Higher better
PDSI
3.07
Higher better
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Soil Moisture 130.254 30% weight
Scaled
Recharge 3.44 25% weight
Scaled
PDSI 3.07 20% weight
Scaled
SM Trend 0.0000 15% weight
Scaled
Precipitation 1,873.70 10% weight
Scaled
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Soil Moisture 130.210 130.297 130.254
Recharge Estimate 3.55 3.33 3.44
PDSI 3.08 3.06 3.07
Groundwater Score 63.2 63.2 63.2
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher score suggests better long-term aquifer and moisture support conditions.

🌧️ Waterlogging

↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Waterlogging?Waterlogging combines topography, imperviousness and wetness indices across nearby grid cells.
Grid Count
418
Sampled cells
Avg Susceptibility
48.2
Lower is safer
High Risk Grids
163
High / Very High
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTargetStatus
Avg Susceptibility 48.2 < 40
Concern
Avg Slope 2.84° > 1°
Good
Avg Impervious 9.0% < 70%
Good
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher susceptibility and low slope increase monsoon water stagnation probability.

🚶 Walkability & Safety

↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Walkability & Safety?OSM amenity metrics reflect pedestrian, safety and urban accessibility infrastructure.
Footpaths
1
Higher better
Street Lamps
0
Higher better
Police/Fire Access
1
Presence
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Footpaths (500m) 1 ≥ 3
Concern
Sidewalk Roads (1km) 0 ≥ 5
Concern
Nearest Police Station 1,700 m ≤ 2000m
Context
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher OSM accessibility/safety features generally improve everyday livability.

⚠️ Risk Factors

↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Risk Factors?Nearby hazards and sensitive risk points mapped around this area.
Total Risks
8
Mapped points
Scoring Breakdown
CategoryRiskDistance / SeverityMeaning
Future_threats NH-6 Bypass Widening Zone 200 m / Critical Properties within 30m of road face acquisition for NH widening
Water_drainage Kharun River Flood Plain 500 m / High Area within flood plain of Kharun river, history of 2019 flooding
Air_pollution Brick Kilns - Tatibandh South 1500 m / High Active brick kilns 1.5km south causing seasonal air pollution
Environmental Old Tatibandh Dump Yard 2000 m / High Decommissioned but not remediated landfill site, 2km from colony
Infrastructure Unlit Patches - Tatibandh Bypass Road 300 m / Medium Stretches of bypass road without streetlights
Environmental Industrial Estate Effluent 800 m / Medium Small-scale industries discharging partially treated effluent
Accessibility No Bus Route Coverage 2000 m / Medium Nearest city bus stop 2+ km away from interior colony
Safety_social Cattle Colony Near Bypass 1000 m / Low Large unauthorized cattle colony on bypass road approach
💡 What does this mean for you?Closer and severe risks can affect insurance, resale and safety comfort.

🌬️ Air Quality: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

💧 Water Quality: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🧹 Sanitation: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🛣️ Infrastructure: Infrastructure Score Formula

Formula: Composite weighted model from GHSL/ESA/VIIRS/Terrain features
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Urbanization index91.7620%SMOD
Built-up balance51.6%15%Best in moderate band
NTL stability65.0%15%Power/activity consistency
Avg building height5.99 m10%Vertical infra proxy
Impervious %40.9%10%Moderate is optimal
Radiance19.4510%Development proxy
Slope0.10°10%Flatter is better
Green support12.1%10%Tree + grass contribution
This is the same weighted structure used in Livability Infrastructure model.
Final: 74.72 / 100

🏥 Amenities: Amenity Score Breakdown

Formula: Each amenity category is capped at 100, final score is averaged across categories
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Hospitals 500m5 * 33Cap 100Health access
Schools 1km5 * 20Cap 100Education access
Markets 1km5 * 33Cap 100Daily needs
Parks 500m8 * 33Cap 100Open space
Transit 1km3 * 50Cap 100Mobility
Category multipliers mirror the Livability snapshot logic.
Final: Final from amenity_scores table

🌳 Green Cover: Green Score Formula

Formula: Score = (NDVI*40%) + (Vegetation*30%) + (Dense Green*20%) + (Parks*10%)
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
NDVI component0.132 => 26.440%10.6
Vegetation component15.0% => 15.030%4.5
Dense green component5.8% => 11.720%2.3
Parks component8 => 100.010%10.0
This matches the Livability GreenCover model weighting logic.
Final: 27.38 / 100

🔊 Noise: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🌊 Flood Risk: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🏚️ Earthquake Risk: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🌡️ Land Surface Temp: LST Score Formula

Formula: Score = ((45 - LST Mean) / 25) * 100, clipped to [0,100]
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
LST Mean31.21 °CReference20°C best, 45°C worst
Lower land surface temperature means better livability.
Final: 55.16 / 100

🏗️ Built-up Density: Built-up Score Formula

Formula: Score = 100 - Built-up %
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Built-up %51.6%InverseLower is better
Dense concrete surfaces reduce infiltration and increase heat islands.
Final: 48.42 / 100

💡 Night-time Lights: Night-time Lights Formula

Formula: Score = min(100, (Avg Radiance / 50) * 100)
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Avg Radiance19.78Scale 0-50Higher indicates activity
Higher night radiance generally tracks electrification and economic intensity.
Final: 39.57 / 100

🏞️ Water Bodies: Water Bodies Score Formula

Formula: Score = (Permanent Water Score * 70%) + (Seasonal Water Score * 30%)
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Permanent water40.66%70%Scaled against 10% benchmark
Seasonal water94.68%30%Scaled against 20% benchmark
Permanent water has higher score weight than seasonal water.
Final: 100.00 / 100

👥 Population Density: Population Density Formula

Formula: Score = ((20000 - density_per_km²) / 20000) * 100, clipped to [0,100]
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Density4,759.4 /km²Inverse scaleLower density -> higher score
This follows the Livability PopulationDensity model.
Final: 76.20 / 100

⛲ Groundwater: Groundwater Score Formula

Formula: Weighted: Soil Moisture 30% + Recharge 25% + PDSI 20% + Trend 15% + Precipitation 10%
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Soil moisture130.25430%Scaled to 0-200
Recharge estimate3.4425%Scaled -200 to +400
PDSI3.0720%Scaled -4 to +4
SM trend0.000015%Scaled -50 to +50
Precipitation1,873.7010%Scaled 800 to 1800
Exactly reused from Livability Groundwater model logic.
Final: 63.19 / 100

🌧️ Waterlogging: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🚶 Walkability & Safety: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

⚠️ Risk Factors: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

View full livability report for Tatibandh →

Compliance Status

RERA registration, filings, and compliance flags based on public CG-RERA records.

Compliance Status Based on public CG-RERA records
3 Passed
1 Issue(s)
2 N/A
RERA Registration Active
Reg No. PCGRERA230618000301 — Status: Ongoing
Section 3 · Source · RERA Official Page
No Penalty Orders
1 order(s) on record, none with penalty sections (Sec 38/39/40/59/61/63)
Sec 38–63 · Source
No Recent Orders
No orders filed in the last 12 months (older: 1)
Source
Completion Overdue
Was due 30 Dec 2023 — overdue by ~29 month(s)
Section 4 · Source
Quarterly Updates Not Available
No compliance snapshot data on record
Section 11 · Source
Annual Audit Not Available
No compliance snapshot data on record
Section 4(2)(l)(D) · Source
Each check is based on publicly available CG-RERA portal data as of May 2026. How this works →

Details

Registration, professional team, bank, promoters, and compliance history.

Registration Details
RERA Number
PCGRERA230618000301
Status
Ongoing
Project Type
Residential Development
Approved Date
23 Jun 2018
Original End Date
30 Mar 2023
EWS Category
NO
Construction Cost
₹ 357405000
Land Cost
₹ 116517000
Proposed Completion
30 Dec 2023
Authorised Person
RAMCHAND KOTWANI
Website
www.kaivalyapark.in
View on Map
Professional Team
RoleNameLicense / Membership
Statutory CA MAYANK KEDIA 448186
Quarterly CA Praveen Goyal 426500
Engineer Er. RAJENDRA JAIN 330/98
Architect SHASHIKANT KUJUR CA/2018/95221
Promoters
K
KEWALYA PARK Partnership Firm
S
SMT CHITRA DUBEY

Buildings & Units

Inventory overview, sold/unsold breakdown, and building details.

Inventory Overview
1
Total Inventory
0
Sold (0%)
1
Unsold (100%)
0
Mortgage (0%)
100%
Sold Unsold Mortgage
Quarterly Plot Updates
PeriodTotalSold (prev)Sold (qtr)RemainingMortgage
2023-07-01 – 2023-09-30 174 164 0 10 0
2023-04-01 – 2023-06-30 174 164 0 10 0
2023-01-01 – 2023-03-31 174 163 1 10 0
2022-10-01 – 2022-12-31 174 162 2 11 0
2022-07-01 – 2022-09-30 174 158 4 12 0
2022-04-01 – 2022-06-30 180 156 2 22 0
2022-01-01 – 2022-03-31 180 154 2 24 0
2021-10-01 – 2021-12-31 180 152 2 26 0
2021-07-01 – 2021-09-30 180 149 3 31 0
2021-04-01 – 2021-06-30 180 146 3 31 0
2021-01-01 – 2021-03-31 180 141 5 34 0
2020-10-01 – 2020-12-31 190 139 2 49 0
2020-07-01 – 2020-09-30 190 138 1 51 0
2020-04-01 – 2020-06-30 190 138 0 52 0
2020-01-01 – 2020-03-31 190 137 1 52 0
2019-10-01 – 2019-12-31 190 136 1 53 0
2019-07-01 – 2019-09-30 190 135 1 54 0
2019-04-01 – 2019-06-30 190 133 2 55 0
2019-01-01 – 2019-03-31 190 132 1 57 0
2018-10-01 – 2018-12-31 190 132 0 58 0
2018-06-23 – 2018-09-30 190 131 1 58 0
Quarterly Building Updates
PeriodTotalSold (prev)Sold (qtr)RemainingMortgage
2023-07-01 – 2023-09-30 181 175 2 4 0
2023-04-01 – 2023-06-30 181 175 0 6 0
2023-01-01 – 2023-03-31 181 173 3 6 0
2022-10-01 – 2022-12-31 181 171 5 8 0
2022-07-01 – 2022-09-30 181 168 3 10 0
2022-04-01 – 2022-06-30 175 166 5 7 0
2022-01-01 – 2022-03-31 175 163 3 9 0
2021-10-01 – 2021-12-31 175 161 2 12 0
2021-07-01 – 2021-09-30 175 159 2 14 0
2021-04-01 – 2021-06-30 175 154 5 16 0
2021-01-01 – 2021-03-31 175 153 1 21 0
2020-10-01 – 2020-12-31 165 148 5 12 0
2020-07-01 – 2020-09-30 165 146 2 17 0
2020-04-01 – 2020-06-30 165 146 0 19 0
2020-01-01 – 2020-03-31 165 143 3 22 0
2019-10-01 – 2019-12-31 165 138 5 22 0
2019-07-01 – 2019-09-30 165 130 8 27 0
2019-04-01 – 2019-06-30 165 125 5 35 0
2019-01-01 – 2019-03-31 165 118 7 40 0
2018-10-01 – 2018-12-31 165 116 2 47 0
2018-06-23 – 2018-09-30 165 109 7 49 0
Quarterly Apartment Updates
PeriodTotalSold (prev)Sold (qtr)RemainingMortgage
2023-07-01 – 2023-09-30 0 0 0 0 0
2023-04-01 – 2023-06-30 0 0 0 0 0
2023-01-01 – 2023-03-31 0 0 0 0 0
2022-10-01 – 2022-12-31 0 0 0 0 0
2022-07-01 – 2022-09-30 0 0 0 0 0
2022-04-01 – 2022-06-30 0 0 0 0 0
2022-01-01 – 2022-03-31 0 0 0 0 0
2021-10-01 – 2021-12-31 0 0 0 0 0
2021-07-01 – 2021-09-30 0 0 0 0 0
2021-04-01 – 2021-06-30 0 0 0 0 0
2021-01-01 – 2021-03-31 0 0 0 0 0
2020-10-01 – 2020-12-31 0 0 0 0 0
2020-07-01 – 2020-09-30 0 0 0 0 0
2020-04-01 – 2020-06-30 0 0 0 0 0
2020-01-01 – 2020-03-31 0 0 0 0 0
2019-10-01 – 2019-12-31 0 0 0 0 0
2019-07-01 – 2019-09-30 0 0 0 0 0
2019-04-01 – 2019-06-30 0 0 0 0 0
2019-01-01 – 2019-03-31 0 0 0 0 0
2018-10-01 – 2018-12-31 0 0 0 0 0
2018-06-23 – 2018-09-30 0 0 0 0 0

Legal Orders & Cases

RERA legal orders, complaints, and case statistics filed against this project.

1
Total Cases
0
Last 12 Months
1
Older Cases
1
PDFs Available
Legal Orders (1)
ComplaintApplicantSectionDateSourcePDF
M-PRO-2022-01756 M/S KAIWALYA PARK Section 18,Section 19 31 Oct 2022 This project

Location

Project address, coordinates, and nearby places.

Location Details
Address
WARD NO. 12, KUMHARI, DHAMDHA, DURG (C.G.)
District
Durg
Tehsil
Dhamdha
Coordinates
21.2439348, 81.5233333 View on Map
Area Livability

Livability of Tatibandh Raipur

Environmental, infrastructure & amenity parameters for the area where this project is located (5.78 km from project). Each value is compared with the Raipur average.

Composite Livability Score
60.0 / 100
Grade C · Average
+1.1 vs Raipur avg (58.9)
Air Quality
96.8 Excellent
Area
97
City
99
-1.8 vs city avg
Water Quality
76.3 Good
Area
76
City
68
+8.3 vs city avg
Sanitation
67.3 Good
Area
67
City
56
+11.3 vs city avg
Green Cover
31.9 Poor
Area
32
City
39
-6.6 vs city avg
Noise Level
70.0 Good
Area
70
City
58
+12.2 vs city avg
Infrastructure
70.2 Good
Area
70
City
76
-6.0 vs city avg
Amenities
100.0 Excellent
Area
100
City
82
+18.2 vs city avg
Flood Safety
17.5 Poor
Area
18
City
38
-20.6 vs city avg
Earthquake Safety
10.0 Poor
Area
10
City
15
-4.6 vs city avg
Land Surface Temp.
55.2 Average
Area
55
City
58
-2.6 vs city avg
Built-up Density
48.4 Below Avg
Area
48
City
35
+13.6 vs city avg
Night-light Activity
39.6 Below Avg
Area
40
City
55
-15.1 vs city avg
Water Bodies Nearby
100.0 Excellent
Area
100
City
93
+7.3 vs city avg
Population Density
76.2 Good
Area
76
City
68
+8.3 vs city avg
Groundwater Status
63.2 Average
Area
63
City
63
-0.2 vs city avg
View detailed livability report for Tatibandh
Neighborhood Intelligence

Explore nearby infrastructure around this project. Toggle categories to show/hide on the map.

Neighborhood Map 3 km radius
RERA Projects Near KEWALYA PARK 20 found within 3 km
# Project District Status Distance
1 balaji kewalya park -2 Durg New 0.06 km
2 BALAJI KEWALYA PARK "I" Durg New 0.13 km
3 BALAJI KEWALYA PARK "3" Durg New 0.17 km
4 Lotus city phase- 05 Durg New 0.27 km
5 HARSHIT PLATINUM GREEN Durg New 0.60 km
6 Lotus city phase- 01 Durg Ongoing 0.95 km
7 ralas royal park Durg Ongoing 1.00 km
8 VASUNDHARA APPARTMENT Durg Ongoing 1.09 km
9 avinash new town Durg New 1.38 km
10 SWASTIK SMART CITY Durg New 1.63 km
11 sarthak homes Durg Ongoing 1.80 km
12 avinash twin city phase-I extension-II Durg New 1.84 km
13 AVINASH TWIN CITY COMMERCIAL - 1 Durg New 1.93 km
14 avinash twin city Durg New 2.05 km
15 AVINASH TWIN CITY - PHASE 1 EXTENSION III Durg New 2.08 km
16 avinash twin city extension Durg New 2.42 km
17 atal vihar yojna parsada kumhari Durg Ongoing 2.45 km
18 avinash twin city -2 Durg New 2.45 km
19 avinash twin city phase-2 extension Durg New 2.50 km
20 AVINASH TWIN CITY - PHASE 2 EXTENSION II Durg New 2.56 km

Buyer Checklist

Documents and verifications a buyer should review before purchase.

Buyer Document Verification Checklist

Key documents a buyer should verify before purchasing in this project. Items marked Available have data on Seemankan.

14/14 verified
  • RERA Registration Certificate Available
    Confirms the project is registered with RERA CG. Verify registration number, validity dates, and project details on the RERA portal.
    RERA No: PCGRERA230618000301
    View on RERA Portal
  • Promoter Registration Certificate Available
    Builder / colonizer company registration certificate. Confirms the promoter entity is a registered firm, company, or society.
    Preview Preview
  • Approved Building / Sanction Plan Available
    Building plan sanctioned by the local authority. Verify floor count, setbacks, and FSI compliance.
    Preview Preview
  • Layout Plan Available
    Approved layout showing plot divisions, roads, open spaces, and common areas.
    Preview
  • Title Deed / Ownership Proof Available
    Proof that the promoter legally owns the land. Verify via Sub-Registrar records.
    Preview
  • Encumbrance Certificate Available
    Confirms the property is free from legal dues, mortgages, or liens. Obtain from Sub-Registrar office.
    Preview
  • Land Use / Diversion Certificate Available
    Required if land was converted from agricultural to non-agricultural use.
    Preview
  • Architect Certificate Available
    Certification from a registered architect confirming structural plans and compliance.
    View View View +17 more
  • Structural Engineer Certificate Available
    Certification from a structural engineer confirming building safety and load-bearing capacity.
    View View View +17 more
  • CA Financial Certificate Available
    Chartered Accountant certificate on financial status, project cost estimates, and fund utilization.
    Preview View View +20 more
  • Commencement Certificate Available
    Permission to begin construction issued by the local authority after plan approval.
    Download Download Download +1 more
  • NOCs (No Objection Certificates) Available
    NOCs from fire department, environment, water supply, electricity board, and other authorities.
    Preview View
  • Project Brochure / Specification Available
    Official brochure with unit types, amenities, and specifications. Compare with actual delivery.
    View View View +15 more
  • RERA Compliance Orders Available
    Check if any orders, penalties, or directions have been issued against this project by RERA.
    1 order(s) on record — review in Legal tab
Disclaimer: This checklist is for informational purposes only. "Available" means Seemankan has a copy from the RERA portal — it does not constitute legal verification. Always verify original documents with the concerned authorities and consult a legal advisor before making a purchase decision.

Risk Zone Within 5 km

Buffer zones (water bodies, airport restrictions) and risk sites (landfills, waste processing) detected within 3 km (immediate) and 5 km (extended) of the project.

4
Risk zones (within 5 km)
3 km: 2 3–5 km: 2
1
Water bodies (river/nala/lake)
3 km: 0 3–5 km: 1
3
Landfill / waste sites
3 km: 2 3–5 km: 1
0
Airport buffer overlap
3 km: 0 3–5 km: 0
Risk Zone Map (3 km & 5 km rings) Project marker centered
Water Bodies (1)
  • Kumhari Talab 3–5 km
    Tank · 50m buffer
    4.38 km
Landfill / Waste Sites (3)
  • Sarora Composting / Bio-methanation Plant ≤3 km
    Waste processing · 200m buffer
    2.84 km
  • Sarora Trenching Ground ≤3 km
    Active landfill · 500m buffer
    2.89 km
  • Bhanpuri-Rawabhata Legacy Dump 3–5 km
    Legacy dump · 500m buffer
    3.93 km

Documents

RERA-filed documents and disclosures available for this project.

RERA Documents (515)
AMOUNT (66)
View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View
APARTMENT (1)
Preview
ARCH (20)
View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View
Affidavit (1)
View
AminitiesPHOTO (32)
View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View
BASEMENT (1)
Preview
BOROUCHRE (16)
View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View
BRIEF (1)
Preview
BUILDING (1)
Preview
BUILDINGPHOTO (158)
View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View
CA (23)
Preview View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View
COLONIZER (1)
Preview
COM (4)
Download Download Download Download
COMMON (1)
Preview
DEVE (1)
Preview
DIVERSION (1)
Preview
Demarcation (1)
Preview
ENGG (20)
View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View
ENUM (1)
Preview
ENV (1)
Preview
FEESHEET (1)
Preview
LAYOUT (1)
Preview
MODI (1)
Preview
NAZUL (1)
Preview
OPENPARKING (1)
Preview
PASSBOOK (1)
Preview
PHOTO (1)
Download
PLOTPHOTO (145)
View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View
PSPEC (1)
Preview
Reg (1)
Preview
SANCTIONBUILDING (1)
Preview
SEARCH (1)
Preview
SELF (1)
Preview
TAC (1)
Preview
other (6)
Preview Preview Preview Preview Preview Preview

Reviews

Verified buyer reviews and ratings for this project.

No reviews yet. Be the first to review this project!

Login to Write a Review

You need to be signed in to submit a review for this project.

Login or Register