RealEstateIQTM
IN हिन्दी
Login Sign Up Free
Want a full project intelligence report? Download a detailed PDF report — RERA compliance, promoter, financials, amenities, location & risk.
Generate Project Report
Home / RERA Projects / BALAJI KEWALYA PARK "I"
NEW Residential Plotted Development RERA Page Project Website
GENERATE REPORT

BALAJI KEWALYA PARK "I"

Compliance Status
Partial Compliance
21.2434, 81.5244 Explore area
District
Durg
Area
—
Promoter
BALAJI BUILDERS AND DEVELOPERS
Project Information
Promoter BALAJI BUILDERS AND DEVELOPERS
Type Residential Plotted Development
Status New
Completion 31 Dec 2024
RERA No. PCGRERA250821001251
Registered 25 Aug 2021
Original End 31 Dec 2023
Total Units 183 · 151 sold
EWS Category NO
Construction Cost ₹ 71336000
Land Cost ₹ 79153000
Authorised Person C.N. PRASANNAN
Address VILLAGE-- WARD-16 ,KUMHARI,TEHHSIL- DHAMDHA , DIST- DURG
At a Glance
183
Total Units
151
Units Sold
20
Unsold
0
Legal Cases
Dec 2024
Target Completion
100%
Completion
Amenities & Facilities (18)
Badminton Court
100%
BOUNDARY WALL
100%
CLUB HOUSE
100%
COMMUNITY BUILDINGS
100%
ENERGY MAANAGEMENT
100%
FIRE PROTECTION AND FIRE SAFETY REQUIREMENTS
100%
GYM
100%
INTERNAL ROADS AND FOOTPATHS
100%
LANDSCAPING AND TREE PLANTING
100%
OPEN PARKING
100%
SECURITY SERVICE
100%
SEWERAGE
100%
SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT AND DISPOSAL
100%
STORM WATER DRAINS
100%
STREET LIGHTING
100%
TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL OF SEWERAGE AND SULLAGE WAT
100%
WATER CONSERVATION RAIN WATER HARVESTING
100%
WATER SUPPLY
100%
Project Professionals
MAYANK KEDIA
STATUTORY CA
CA VIKRAM CHHABDA
QUARTERLY CA
ER. RAJENDRA JAIN
ENGINEER
SHASHIKANT KUJUR
ARCHITECT
Project Analysis

360° Project Intelligence

Comprehensive analysis across regulatory, livability, market, filing activity, and market readiness dimensions.

Regulatory
86
12 of 14 checks · Strong Signals
Livability
49
Sarona · Limited Signals
Legal
0
No legal orders on record · 20 nearby
Filing Activity
268
226 docs · 42 quarterly updates
Market Readiness
25
New · due Dec 2024
Area Livability

Livability of Sarona

Eighteen environmental, infrastructure and amenity parameters for the nearest mapped area (Sarona — 5.67 km from this project). Click any parameter for the underlying readings, thresholds and what they mean.



🏠 Livability Parameters

Latest readings for Sarona. Only parameters with available data are shown below. Based on the latest readings for Sarona.

C
Composite Score
48.9 /100
Average

🌬️ Air Quality

Final Score: 97.2/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Air Quality?AQI summarizes PM2.5, PM10 and gases. Lower pollution values improve public health outcomes.
AQI
57
Satisfactory
PM2.5
28.4 µg/m³
≤ 40
PM10
71.3 µg/m³
≤ 60
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
PM2.5 28.4 µg/m³ ≤ 40
Good
PM10 71.3 µg/m³ ≤ 60
Concern
NO₂ 32.4 µg/m³ ≤ 40
Good
💡 What does this mean for you?Cleaner air lowers respiratory burden and improves outdoor comfort.

💧 Water Quality

Final Score: 61.5/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Water Quality?Water quality combines chemistry, supply duration and contamination markers.
TDS
352 ppm
≤ 500
pH
7.19
6.5–8.5
Supply
5.4 hr/day
≥ 8 hr
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
TDS 352 ppm ≤ 500
Good
Fluoride 0.91 mg/L ≤ 1.0
Good
Turbidity 6.9 NTU ≤ 1
Concern
💡 What does this mean for you?Better supply quality and consistency reduces dependence on tanker/groundwater fallback.

🧹 Sanitation

Final Score: 28.9/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Sanitation?Sanitation reflects ODF status, sewage treatment and waste management regularity.
ODF
ODF
ODF++
Sewage Coverage
18%
≥ 80%
Drainage
28%
≥ 90%
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
ODF Status ODF ODF++
Info
Sewage Coverage 18% ≥ 80%
Concern
Drainage Coverage 28% ≥ 90%
Concern
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher sanitation maturity lowers disease exposure and neighborhood nuisance.

🛣️ Infrastructure

Final Score: 66.0/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Infrastructure?Infrastructure score combines land use, urbanization, built form, night lights and terrain indicators.
Built-up
35.0%
Balanced band
Tree Cover
16.7%
≥ 15%
Urbanization
92.3
Higher better
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Built-up (LULC) 35.0% 40-70%
Contextual
Impervious Surface 23.6% < 70%
Good
NDVI Mean 0.290 > 0.3
Concern
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Built-up (LULC) % 32.6% 37.4% 35.0%
Tree Cover % 14.0% 19.4% 16.7%
Urbanization Index 100.0 84.7 92.3
Infra Score 65.3 66.8 66.0
💡 What does this mean for you?Balanced built + green mix usually improves long-term livability resilience.

🏥 Amenities

Final Score: 68.6/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Amenities?Amenity score captures daily-access services in walk/short-drive radii.
Hospitals 500m
0
Target ≥1
Schools 1km
5
Target ≥3
Parks 500m
2
Target ≥1
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Hospitals (500m) 0 ≥1
Concern
Schools (1km) 5 ≥3
Good
Markets (1km) 2 ≥1
Good
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher local amenity density improves convenience and walkability.

🌳 Green Cover

Final Score: 38.2/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Green Cover?NDVI and vegetation structure are measured from satellite imagery to estimate neighborhood greenery.
NDVI Mean
0.243
Greenness index
Vegetation
21.2%
% green pixels
Dense Green
12.7%
Thick canopy
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
NDVI Mean 0.243 0.5 maps to score 100
Weighted 40%
Vegetation % 21.2% Direct % (cap 100)
Weighted 30%
Dense Green % 12.7% Scaled from 50%
Weighted 20%
Parks within 500m 2 Count * 33 (cap 100)
Weighted 10%
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
NDVI Mean 0.243 0.243 0.243
Vegetation % 22.6% 19.8% 21.2%
Dense Green % 9.9% 15.5% 12.7%
Tree Canopy % 10.2% 20.0% 15.1%
Green Score 36.8 38.2 37.5
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher green metrics typically reduce heat stress and improve comfort.

🔊 Noise

Final Score: 48.9/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Noise?Noise uses measured day/night dB compared to CPCB zone limits.
Day dB
51.8
vs CPCB day limit
Night dB
43.3
vs CPCB night limit
Zone
CPCB class
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Day Noise 51.8 dB ≤ 55.0 dB
Good
Night Noise 43.3 dB ≤ 45.0 dB
Good
Nearest Highway 340 m Higher usually quieter
Info
💡 What does this mean for you?Chronic high noise impacts stress, sleep quality and perceived comfort.

🌊 Flood Risk

Final Score: 17.5/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Flood Risk?Flood risk combines river exposure and local waterlogging vulnerability.
Overall Risk
Low-Medium
Lower is safer
River Risk
Low-Medium
Lower is safer
Waterlogging
Low
Lower is safer
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Overall Risk Low-Medium Low preferred
Info
River Flood Risk Low-Medium Low preferred
Info
Waterlogging Risk Low Low preferred
Info
💡 What does this mean for you?Lower flood risk means less disruption and lower hazard exposure.

🏚️ Earthquake Risk

Final Score: 10.0/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Earthquake Risk?Earthquake profile uses seismic zone, PGA and soil/liquefaction risk factors.
Seismic Zone
Zone II
Lower risk zone preferred
Risk Level
Low
Low preferred
Liquefaction
None
Low preferred
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Seismic Zone Zone II II preferred
Info
Risk Level Low Low preferred
Info
PGA (475yr) 0.0155g Lower preferred
Info
💡 What does this mean for you?Lower seismic hazard reduces structural and insurance risk exposure.

🌡️ Land Surface Temp

Final Score: 59.9/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Land Surface Temp?Land Surface Temperature reflects heat-island intensity from satellite thermal bands.
LST Mean
30.0°C
Lower better
LST Min
18.8°C
Context
LST Max
39.9°C
Lower better
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
LST Mean 30.0°C 20°C best / 45°C worst
Weighted by formula
LST Score 59.9 0-100
Computed
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
LST Mean (°C) 30.0 30.1 30.0
LST Min (°C) 20.6 16.9 18.8
LST Max (°C) 40.0 39.8 39.9
LST Score 60.1 59.8 59.9
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher heat exposure affects comfort, cooling load and health risk.

🏗️ Built-up Density

Final Score: 65.0/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Built-up Density?Built-up density measures extent of developed surface versus open space.
Built-up %
35.0%
Lower better
Open Space %
65.0%
Higher better
Built-up Score
65.0
0-100
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Built-up % 35.0% Inverse scoring
Score = 100 - builtup%
Open Space % 65.0% Context
Info
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Built-up % 32.6% 37.4% 35.0%
Open Space % 67.4% 62.6% 65.0%
Built-up Score 67.4 62.6 65.0
💡 What does this mean for you?Very high built-up often raises heat and runoff while reducing open environmental buffers.

💡 Night-time Lights

Final Score: 33.8/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Night-time Lights?Nighttime lights are a proxy for economic activity and electrification intensity.
Avg Radiance
16.91
Higher better
Max Radiance
25.47
Context
NTL Score
33.8
0-100
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Avg Radiance 16.91 Scaled to 50
Score = min(100, avg/50*100)
NTL Score 33.8 0-100
Computed
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Avg Radiance 18.17 15.65 16.91
Max Radiance 26.69 24.26 25.47
NTL Score 36.3 31.3 33.8
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher radiance often indicates stronger urban activity but can correlate with light pollution.

🏞️ Water Bodies

Final Score: 100.0/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Water Bodies?Water-bodies score reflects permanent and seasonal water presence in the analysis radius.
Permanent Water
50.45%
Higher generally better
Seasonal Water
95.76%
Context
Water Score
100.0
0-100
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Permanent Water % 50.45% 70% weight
Scaled against 10%
Seasonal Water % 95.76% 30% weight
Scaled against 20%
Water Score 100.0 0-100
Computed
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Permanent Water % 56.74% 44.15% 50.45%
Seasonal Water % 96.67% 94.84% 95.76%
Water Score 100.0 100.0 100.0
💡 What does this mean for you?Water presence can support cooling, recharge and ecological quality.

👥 Population Density

Final Score: 82.5/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Population Density?Population density indicates urban crowding pressure around the area.
Population
58,217
Estimated residents
Density/km²
3,491.6
Lower better for this score
Score
82.5
0-100
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Density/km² 3,491.6 Inverse scale up to 20,000
Lower -> higher score
Score 82.5 0-100
Computed
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Population Total 10,126 106,307 58,217
Density / km² 3,223.3 3,759.8 3,491.6
Pop Density Score 83.9 81.2 82.5
💡 What does this mean for you?Extremely high density can increase pressure on services and mobility.

⛲ Groundwater

Final Score: 63.1/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Groundwater?Groundwater score combines moisture, recharge, drought and trend indicators.
Soil Moisture
130.432
Higher better
Recharge
2.98
Higher better
PDSI
3.02
Higher better
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Soil Moisture 130.432 30% weight
Scaled
Recharge 2.98 25% weight
Scaled
PDSI 3.02 20% weight
Scaled
SM Trend 0.0000 15% weight
Scaled
Precipitation 1,874.19 10% weight
Scaled
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Soil Moisture 130.464 130.399 130.432
Recharge Estimate 2.93 3.04 2.98
PDSI 3.02 3.02 3.02
Groundwater Score 63.1 63.1 63.1
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher score suggests better long-term aquifer and moisture support conditions.

🌧️ Waterlogging

↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Waterlogging?Waterlogging combines topography, imperviousness and wetness indices across nearby grid cells.
Grid Count
275
Sampled cells
Avg Susceptibility
49.2
Lower is safer
High Risk Grids
117
High / Very High
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTargetStatus
Avg Susceptibility 49.2 < 40
Concern
Avg Slope 2.57° > 1°
Good
Avg Impervious 7.7% < 70%
Good
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher susceptibility and low slope increase monsoon water stagnation probability.

🚶 Walkability & Safety

↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Walkability & Safety?OSM amenity metrics reflect pedestrian, safety and urban accessibility infrastructure.
Footpaths
0
Higher better
Street Lamps
0
Higher better
Police/Fire Access
2
Presence
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Footpaths (500m) 0 ≥ 3
Concern
Sidewalk Roads (1km) 0 ≥ 5
Concern
Nearest Police Station 941 m ≤ 2000m
Context
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher OSM accessibility/safety features generally improve everyday livability.

🌬️ Air Quality: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

💧 Water Quality: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🧹 Sanitation: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🛣️ Infrastructure: Infrastructure Score Formula

Formula: Composite weighted model from GHSL/ESA/VIIRS/Terrain features
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Urbanization index92.3320%SMOD
Built-up balance35.0%15%Best in moderate band
NTL stability65.0%15%Power/activity consistency
Avg building height4.31 m10%Vertical infra proxy
Impervious %23.6%10%Moderate is optimal
Radiance16.5210%Development proxy
Slope0.10°10%Flatter is better
Green support16.7%10%Tree + grass contribution
This is the same weighted structure used in Livability Infrastructure model.
Final: 66.00 / 100

🏥 Amenities: Amenity Score Breakdown

Formula: Each amenity category is capped at 100, final score is averaged across categories
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Hospitals 500m0 * 33Cap 100Health access
Schools 1km5 * 20Cap 100Education access
Markets 1km2 * 33Cap 100Daily needs
Parks 500m2 * 33Cap 100Open space
Transit 1km1 * 50Cap 100Mobility
Category multipliers mirror the Livability snapshot logic.
Final: Final from amenity_scores table

🌳 Green Cover: Green Score Formula

Formula: Score = (NDVI*40%) + (Vegetation*30%) + (Dense Green*20%) + (Parks*10%)
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
NDVI component0.243 => 48.640%19.4
Vegetation component21.2% => 21.230%6.3
Dense green component12.7% => 25.420%5.1
Parks component2 => 66.010%6.6
This matches the Livability GreenCover model weighting logic.
Final: 37.46 / 100

🔊 Noise: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🌊 Flood Risk: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🏚️ Earthquake Risk: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🌡️ Land Surface Temp: LST Score Formula

Formula: Score = ((45 - LST Mean) / 25) * 100, clipped to [0,100]
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
LST Mean30.02 °CReference20°C best, 45°C worst
Lower land surface temperature means better livability.
Final: 59.92 / 100

🏗️ Built-up Density: Built-up Score Formula

Formula: Score = 100 - Built-up %
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Built-up %35.0%InverseLower is better
Dense concrete surfaces reduce infiltration and increase heat islands.
Final: 65.00 / 100

💡 Night-time Lights: Night-time Lights Formula

Formula: Score = min(100, (Avg Radiance / 50) * 100)
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Avg Radiance16.91Scale 0-50Higher indicates activity
Higher night radiance generally tracks electrification and economic intensity.
Final: 33.82 / 100

🏞️ Water Bodies: Water Bodies Score Formula

Formula: Score = (Permanent Water Score * 70%) + (Seasonal Water Score * 30%)
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Permanent water50.45%70%Scaled against 10% benchmark
Seasonal water95.76%30%Scaled against 20% benchmark
Permanent water has higher score weight than seasonal water.
Final: 100.00 / 100

👥 Population Density: Population Density Formula

Formula: Score = ((20000 - density_per_km²) / 20000) * 100, clipped to [0,100]
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Density3,491.6 /km²Inverse scaleLower density -> higher score
This follows the Livability PopulationDensity model.
Final: 82.54 / 100

⛲ Groundwater: Groundwater Score Formula

Formula: Weighted: Soil Moisture 30% + Recharge 25% + PDSI 20% + Trend 15% + Precipitation 10%
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Soil moisture130.43230%Scaled to 0-200
Recharge estimate2.9825%Scaled -200 to +400
PDSI3.0220%Scaled -4 to +4
SM trend0.000015%Scaled -50 to +50
Precipitation1,874.1910%Scaled 800 to 1800
Exactly reused from Livability Groundwater model logic.
Final: 63.07 / 100

🌧️ Waterlogging: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🚶 Walkability & Safety: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

View full livability report for Sarona →

Compliance Status

RERA registration, filings, and compliance flags based on public CG-RERA records.

Compliance Status Based on public CG-RERA records
3 Passed
1 Issue(s)
2 N/A
RERA Registration Active
Reg No. PCGRERA250821001251 — Status: New
Section 3 · Source · RERA Official Page
No RERA Orders
No complaints or orders found against this project
Sec 38–63 · Source
No Orders in Last 12 Months
Clean record — no complaints or orders filed
Source
Completion Overdue
Was due 31 Dec 2024 — overdue by ~17 month(s)
Section 4 · Source
Quarterly Updates Not Available
No compliance snapshot data on record
Section 11 · Source
Annual Audit Not Available
No compliance snapshot data on record
Section 4(2)(l)(D) · Source
Each check is based on publicly available CG-RERA portal data as of May 2026. How this works →
Other Projects by Same Promoter (3)
ProjectRERA No.StatusDistrictType
balaji kewalya park -2 PCGRERA110722001471 New Durg Residential Development
BALAJI KEWALYA PARK "3" PCGRERA300424001768 New Durg Residential Plotted Development
shreeje v3 balaji greens PCGRERA230618000306 Ongoing Raipur Residential Development

Details

Registration, professional team, bank, promoters, and compliance history.

Registration Details
RERA Number
PCGRERA250821001251
Status
New
Project Type
Residential Plotted Development
Approved Date
25 Aug 2021
Original End Date
31 Dec 2023
EWS Category
NO
Construction Cost
₹ 71336000
Land Cost
₹ 79153000
Proposed Completion
31 Dec 2024
Authorised Person
C.N. PRASANNAN
View on Map
Professional Team
RoleNameLicense / Membership
Statutory CA MAYANK KEDIA 448186
Quarterly CA CA VIKRAM CHHABDA 412613
Engineer Er. RAJENDRA JAIN 330/98
Architect SHASHIKANT KUJUR CA/2018/95221
Promoters
B
BALAJI BUILDERS AND DEVELOPERS Partnership Firm

Buildings & Units

Inventory overview, sold/unsold breakdown, and building details.

Inventory Overview
183
Total Inventory
151
Sold (83%)
20
Unsold (11%)
12
Mortgage (7%)
83%
11%
7%
Sold Unsold Mortgage
Quarterly Plot Updates
PeriodTotalSold (prev)Sold (qtr)RemainingMortgage
2024-10-01 – 2024-12-31 183 149 2 32 12
2024-07-01 – 2024-09-30 183 147 2 34 12
2024-04-01 – 2024-06-30 183 144 3 36 12
2024-01-01 – 2024-03-31 183 139 6 39 22
2023-10-01 – 2023-12-31 183 131 8 44 23
2023-07-01 – 2023-09-30 183 123 8 52 23
2023-04-01 – 2023-06-30 183 94 29 60 23
2023-01-01 – 2023-03-31 183 87 9 89 23
2022-10-01 – 2022-12-31 183 75 12 96 23
2022-07-01 – 2022-09-30 183 61 15 108 23
2022-04-01 – 2022-06-30 183 39 22 122 23
2022-01-01 – 2022-03-31 183 26 14 144 23
2021-10-01 – 2021-12-31 183 8 18 157 23
2021-08-25 – 2021-09-30 183 0 8 175 23
Quarterly Building Updates
PeriodTotalSold (prev)Sold (qtr)RemainingMortgage
2024-10-01 – 2024-12-31 0 0 0 0 0
2024-07-01 – 2024-09-30 0 0 0 0 0
2024-04-01 – 2024-06-30 0 0 0 0 0
2024-01-01 – 2024-03-31 0 0 0 0 0
2023-10-01 – 2023-12-31 0 0 0 0 0
2023-07-01 – 2023-09-30 0 0 0 0 0
2023-04-01 – 2023-06-30 0 0 0 0 0
2023-01-01 – 2023-03-31 0 0 0 0 0
2022-10-01 – 2022-12-31 0 0 0 0 0
2022-07-01 – 2022-09-30 0 0 0 0 0
2022-04-01 – 2022-06-30 0 0 0 0 0
2022-01-01 – 2022-03-31 0 0 0 0 0
2021-10-01 – 2021-12-31 0 0 0 0 0
2021-08-25 – 2021-09-30 0 0 0 0 0
Quarterly Apartment Updates
PeriodTotalSold (prev)Sold (qtr)RemainingMortgage
2024-10-01 – 2024-12-31 0 0 0 0 0
2024-07-01 – 2024-09-30 0 0 0 0 0
2024-04-01 – 2024-06-30 0 0 0 0 0
2024-01-01 – 2024-03-31 0 0 0 0 0
2023-10-01 – 2023-12-31 0 0 0 0 0
2023-07-01 – 2023-09-30 0 0 0 0 0
2023-04-01 – 2023-06-30 0 0 0 0 0
2023-01-01 – 2023-03-31 0 0 0 0 0
2022-10-01 – 2022-12-31 0 0 0 0 0
2022-07-01 – 2022-09-30 0 0 0 0 0
2022-04-01 – 2022-06-30 0 0 0 0 0
2022-01-01 – 2022-03-31 0 0 0 0 0
2021-10-01 – 2021-12-31 0 0 0 0 0
2021-08-25 – 2021-09-30 0 0 0 0 0

Legal Orders & Cases

RERA legal orders, complaints, and case statistics filed against this project.

Legal Orders (0)
ComplaintApplicantSectionDateSourcePDF
No orders found for this project.

Location

Project address, coordinates, and nearby places.

Location Details
Address
VILLAGE-- WARD-16 ,KUMHARI,TEHHSIL- DHAMDHA , DIST- DURG
District
Durg
Tehsil
Dhamdha
Coordinates
21.2433943, 81.5244318 View on Map
Area Livability

Livability of Sarona Raipur

Environmental, infrastructure & amenity parameters for the area where this project is located (5.67 km from project). Each value is compared with the Raipur average.

Composite Livability Score
48.9 / 100
Grade C · Below Avg
-10.1 vs Raipur avg (58.9)
Air Quality
97.2 Excellent
Area
97
City
99
-1.4 vs city avg
Water Quality
61.5 Average
Area
62
City
68
-6.4 vs city avg
Sanitation
28.9 Poor
Area
29
City
56
-27.1 vs city avg
Green Cover
38.2 Below Avg
Area
38
City
39
-0.3 vs city avg
Noise Level
48.9 Below Avg
Area
49
City
58
-9.0 vs city avg
Infrastructure
66.0 Good
Area
66
City
76
-10.2 vs city avg
Amenities
68.6 Good
Area
69
City
82
-13.2 vs city avg
Flood Safety
17.5 Poor
Area
18
City
38
-20.6 vs city avg
Earthquake Safety
10.0 Poor
Area
10
City
15
-4.6 vs city avg
Land Surface Temp.
59.9 Average
Area
60
City
58
+2.1 vs city avg
Built-up Density
65.0 Good
Area
65
City
35
+30.2 vs city avg
Night-light Activity
33.8 Poor
Area
34
City
55
-20.9 vs city avg
Water Bodies Nearby
100.0 Excellent
Area
100
City
93
+7.3 vs city avg
Population Density
82.5 Excellent
Area
83
City
68
+14.6 vs city avg
Groundwater Status
63.1 Average
Area
63
City
63
-0.3 vs city avg
View detailed livability report for Sarona
Neighborhood Intelligence

Explore nearby infrastructure around this project. Toggle categories to show/hide on the map.

Neighborhood Map 3 km radius
RERA Projects Near BALAJI KEWALYA PARK "I" 20 found within 3 km
# Project District Status Distance
1 balaji kewalya park -2 Durg New 0.10 km
2 KEWALYA PARK Durg Ongoing 0.13 km
3 BALAJI KEWALYA PARK "3" Durg New 0.28 km
4 Lotus city phase- 05 Durg New 0.29 km
5 HARSHIT PLATINUM GREEN Durg New 0.50 km
6 Lotus city phase- 01 Durg Ongoing 0.91 km
7 ralas royal park Durg Ongoing 0.96 km
8 VASUNDHARA APPARTMENT Durg Ongoing 1.19 km
9 avinash new town Durg New 1.37 km
10 SWASTIK SMART CITY Durg New 1.54 km
11 avinash twin city phase-I extension-II Durg New 1.83 km
12 AVINASH TWIN CITY COMMERCIAL - 1 Durg New 1.91 km
13 sarthak homes Durg Ongoing 1.91 km
14 avinash twin city Durg New 2.02 km
15 AVINASH TWIN CITY - PHASE 1 EXTENSION III Durg New 2.08 km
16 atal vihar yojna parsada kumhari Durg Ongoing 2.34 km
17 avinash twin city extension Durg New 2.40 km
18 avinash twin city -2 Durg New 2.45 km
19 avinash twin city phase-2 extension Durg New 2.49 km
20 AVINASH TWIN CITY - PHASE 2 EXTENSION II Durg New 2.57 km

Buyer Checklist

Documents and verifications a buyer should review before purchase.

Buyer Document Verification Checklist

Key documents a buyer should verify before purchasing in this project. Items marked Available have data on Seemankan.

11/14 verified
  • RERA Registration Certificate Available
    Confirms the project is registered with RERA CG. Verify registration number, validity dates, and project details on the RERA portal.
    RERA No: PCGRERA250821001251
    View on RERA Portal
  • Promoter Registration Certificate Available
    Builder / colonizer company registration certificate. Confirms the promoter entity is a registered firm, company, or society.
    Preview Preview
  • Approved Building / Sanction Plan Verify Independently
    Building plan sanctioned by the local authority. Verify floor count, setbacks, and FSI compliance.
  • Layout Plan Available
    Approved layout showing plot divisions, roads, open spaces, and common areas.
    Preview
  • Title Deed / Ownership Proof Available
    Proof that the promoter legally owns the land. Verify via Sub-Registrar records.
    Preview
  • Encumbrance Certificate Available
    Confirms the property is free from legal dues, mortgages, or liens. Obtain from Sub-Registrar office.
    Preview
  • Land Use / Diversion Certificate Available
    Required if land was converted from agricultural to non-agricultural use.
    Preview
  • Architect Certificate Available
    Certification from a registered architect confirming structural plans and compliance.
    View View View +10 more
  • Structural Engineer Certificate Available
    Certification from a structural engineer confirming building safety and load-bearing capacity.
    View View View +10 more
  • CA Financial Certificate Available
    Chartered Accountant certificate on financial status, project cost estimates, and fund utilization.
    Preview View View +13 more
  • Commencement Certificate Available
    Permission to begin construction issued by the local authority after plan approval.
    Download Download Download +1 more
  • NOCs (No Objection Certificates) Verify Independently
    NOCs from fire department, environment, water supply, electricity board, and other authorities.
  • Project Brochure / Specification Available
    Official brochure with unit types, amenities, and specifications. Compare with actual delivery.
    View View View +7 more
  • RERA Compliance Orders Verify Independently
    Check if any orders, penalties, or directions have been issued against this project by RERA.
Disclaimer: This checklist is for informational purposes only. "Available" means Seemankan has a copy from the RERA portal — it does not constitute legal verification. Always verify original documents with the concerned authorities and consult a legal advisor before making a purchase decision.

Risk Zone Within 5 km

Buffer zones (water bodies, airport restrictions) and risk sites (landfills, waste processing) detected within 3 km (immediate) and 5 km (extended) of the project.

4
Risk zones (within 5 km)
3 km: 2 3–5 km: 2
1
Water bodies (river/nala/lake)
3 km: 0 3–5 km: 1
3
Landfill / waste sites
3 km: 2 3–5 km: 1
0
Airport buffer overlap
3 km: 0 3–5 km: 0
Risk Zone Map (3 km & 5 km rings) Project marker centered
Water Bodies (1)
  • Kumhari Talab 3–5 km
    Tank · 50m buffer
    4.33 km
Landfill / Waste Sites (3)
  • Sarora Composting / Bio-methanation Plant ≤3 km
    Waste processing · 200m buffer
    2.75 km
  • Sarora Trenching Ground ≤3 km
    Active landfill · 500m buffer
    2.78 km
  • Bhanpuri-Rawabhata Legacy Dump 3–5 km
    Legacy dump · 500m buffer
    3.8 km

Documents

RERA-filed documents and disclosures available for this project.

RERA Documents (226)
AMOUNT (42)
View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View
ARCH (13)
View View View View View View View View View View View View View
BOROUCHRE (8)
View View View View View View View View
BRIEF (1)
Preview
CA (16)
Preview View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View
COLONIZER (1)
Preview
COM (4)
Download Download Download Download
DEVE (1)
Preview
DIVERSION (1)
Preview
Demarcation (1)
Preview
Dev (1)
Preview
ENGG (13)
View View View View View View View View View View View View View
ENUM (1)
Preview
FEESHEET (1)
Preview
LAYOUT (1)
Preview
OPENPARKING (1)
Preview
PASSBOOK (1)
Preview
PHOTO (1)
Download
PLOTPHOTO (107)
View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View View
PSPEC (1)
Preview
Reg (1)
Preview
SEARCH (1)
Preview
SELF (1)
Preview
TAC (1)
Preview
other (6)
Preview Preview Preview Preview Preview Preview

Reviews

Verified buyer reviews and ratings for this project.

No reviews yet. Be the first to review this project!

Login to Write a Review

You need to be signed in to submit a review for this project.

Login or Register