Home / RERA Projects / VITTHAL GREENS
NEW Residential Plotted Development RERA Page Project Website
GENERATE REPORT

VITTHAL GREENS

Compliance Status
Partial Compliance
21.2410, 81.4815 Explore area
District
Durg
Area
—
Promoter
CHAITANYA BAGHEL
Project Information
Promoter CHAITANYA BAGHEL
Type Residential Plotted Development
Status New
Completion 31 Dec 2023
RERA No. PCGRERA231020001153
Registered 23 Oct 2020
Original End 30 Sep 2023
Total Units 327 · 105 sold
EWS Category NO
Construction Cost ₹ 71400000
Land Cost ₹ 34927000
Authorised Person chaitanya baghel
Address VILLAGE-JANJGIRI TEHSIL-DHAMDA, DIST- DURG
At a Glance
327
Total Units
105
Units Sold
222
Unsold
2
Legal Cases
Dec 2023
Target Completion
100%
Completion
Amenities & Facilities (195)
BOUNDARY WALL
28%
BOUNDARY WALL
65%
BOUNDARY WALL
65%
BOUNDARY WALL
75%
BOUNDARY WALL
75%
BOUNDARY WALL
75%
BOUNDARY WALL
75%
BOUNDARY WALL
75%
BOUNDARY WALL
75%
BOUNDARY WALL
75%
BOUNDARY WALL
75%
BOUNDARY WALL
75%
BOUNDARY WALL
88%
BOUNDARY WALL
88%
BOUNDARY WALL
88%
ENERGY MAANAGEMENT
0%
ENERGY MAANAGEMENT
0%
ENERGY MAANAGEMENT
0%
ENERGY MAANAGEMENT
0%
ENERGY MAANAGEMENT
0%
ENERGY MAANAGEMENT
0%
ENERGY MAANAGEMENT
0%
ENERGY MAANAGEMENT
0%
ENERGY MAANAGEMENT
0%
ENERGY MAANAGEMENT
0%
ENERGY MAANAGEMENT
0%
ENERGY MAANAGEMENT
0%
ENERGY MAANAGEMENT
30%
ENERGY MAANAGEMENT
30%
ENERGY MAANAGEMENT
30%
INTERNAL ROADS AND FOOTPATHS
28%
INTERNAL ROADS AND FOOTPATHS
60%
INTERNAL ROADS AND FOOTPATHS
62%
INTERNAL ROADS AND FOOTPATHS
70%
INTERNAL ROADS AND FOOTPATHS
70%
INTERNAL ROADS AND FOOTPATHS
70%
INTERNAL ROADS AND FOOTPATHS
70%
INTERNAL ROADS AND FOOTPATHS
70%
INTERNAL ROADS AND FOOTPATHS
70%
INTERNAL ROADS AND FOOTPATHS
70%
INTERNAL ROADS AND FOOTPATHS
70%
INTERNAL ROADS AND FOOTPATHS
70%
INTERNAL ROADS AND FOOTPATHS
80%
INTERNAL ROADS AND FOOTPATHS
80%
INTERNAL ROADS AND FOOTPATHS
85%
LANDSCAPING AND TREE PLANTING
8%
LANDSCAPING AND TREE PLANTING
15%
LANDSCAPING AND TREE PLANTING
17%
LANDSCAPING AND TREE PLANTING
20%
LANDSCAPING AND TREE PLANTING
22%
LANDSCAPING AND TREE PLANTING
23%
LANDSCAPING AND TREE PLANTING
23%
LANDSCAPING AND TREE PLANTING
23%
LANDSCAPING AND TREE PLANTING
23%
LANDSCAPING AND TREE PLANTING
23%
LANDSCAPING AND TREE PLANTING
23%
LANDSCAPING AND TREE PLANTING
23%
LANDSCAPING AND TREE PLANTING
60%
LANDSCAPING AND TREE PLANTING
60%
LANDSCAPING AND TREE PLANTING
65%
OPEN PARKING
8%
OPEN PARKING
15%
OPEN PARKING
17%
OPEN PARKING
30%
OPEN PARKING
30%
OPEN PARKING
30%
OPEN PARKING
30%
OPEN PARKING
30%
OPEN PARKING
30%
OPEN PARKING
30%
OPEN PARKING
30%
OPEN PARKING
30%
OPEN PARKING
58%
OPEN PARKING
58%
OPEN PARKING
58%
SECURITY SERVICE
23%
SECURITY SERVICE
60%
SECURITY SERVICE
62%
SECURITY SERVICE
75%
SECURITY SERVICE
75%
SECURITY SERVICE
75%
SECURITY SERVICE
75%
SECURITY SERVICE
75%
SECURITY SERVICE
75%
SECURITY SERVICE
75%
SECURITY SERVICE
75%
SECURITY SERVICE
75%
SECURITY SERVICE
95%
SECURITY SERVICE
95%
SECURITY SERVICE
95%
SEWERAGE
28%
SEWERAGE
60%
SEWERAGE
62%
SEWERAGE
65%
SEWERAGE
65%
SEWERAGE
65%
SEWERAGE
65%
SEWERAGE
65%
SEWERAGE
65%
SEWERAGE
65%
SEWERAGE
65%
SEWERAGE
65%
SEWERAGE
76%
SEWERAGE
76%
SEWERAGE
80%
SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT AND DISPOSAL
0%
SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT AND DISPOSAL
0%
SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT AND DISPOSAL
0%
SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT AND DISPOSAL
0%
SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT AND DISPOSAL
0%
SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT AND DISPOSAL
0%
SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT AND DISPOSAL
0%
SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT AND DISPOSAL
0%
SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT AND DISPOSAL
0%
SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT AND DISPOSAL
0%
SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT AND DISPOSAL
0%
SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT AND DISPOSAL
0%
SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT AND DISPOSAL
0%
SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT AND DISPOSAL
0%
SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT AND DISPOSAL
0%
STORM WATER DRAINS
28%
STORM WATER DRAINS
60%
STORM WATER DRAINS
60%
STORM WATER DRAINS
65%
STORM WATER DRAINS
65%
STORM WATER DRAINS
65%
STORM WATER DRAINS
65%
STORM WATER DRAINS
65%
STORM WATER DRAINS
65%
STORM WATER DRAINS
65%
STORM WATER DRAINS
65%
STORM WATER DRAINS
65%
STORM WATER DRAINS
76%
STORM WATER DRAINS
76%
STORM WATER DRAINS
78%
STREET LIGHTING
0%
STREET LIGHTING
20%
STREET LIGHTING
20%
STREET LIGHTING
35%
STREET LIGHTING
35%
STREET LIGHTING
35%
STREET LIGHTING
35%
STREET LIGHTING
35%
STREET LIGHTING
35%
STREET LIGHTING
35%
STREET LIGHTING
35%
STREET LIGHTING
35%
STREET LIGHTING
60%
STREET LIGHTING
60%
STREET LIGHTING
60%
TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL OF SEWERAGE AND SULLAGE WAT
15%
TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL OF SEWERAGE AND SULLAGE WAT
50%
TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL OF SEWERAGE AND SULLAGE WAT
50%
TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL OF SEWERAGE AND SULLAGE WAT
55%
TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL OF SEWERAGE AND SULLAGE WAT
55%
TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL OF SEWERAGE AND SULLAGE WAT
55%
TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL OF SEWERAGE AND SULLAGE WAT
55%
TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL OF SEWERAGE AND SULLAGE WAT
55%
TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL OF SEWERAGE AND SULLAGE WAT
55%
TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL OF SEWERAGE AND SULLAGE WAT
55%
TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL OF SEWERAGE AND SULLAGE WAT
55%
TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL OF SEWERAGE AND SULLAGE WAT
55%
TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL OF SEWERAGE AND SULLAGE WAT
70%
TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL OF SEWERAGE AND SULLAGE WAT
70%
TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL OF SEWERAGE AND SULLAGE WAT
75%
WATER CONSERVATION RAIN WATER HARVESTING
22%
WATER CONSERVATION RAIN WATER HARVESTING
65%
WATER CONSERVATION RAIN WATER HARVESTING
66%
WATER CONSERVATION RAIN WATER HARVESTING
75%
WATER CONSERVATION RAIN WATER HARVESTING
75%
WATER CONSERVATION RAIN WATER HARVESTING
75%
WATER CONSERVATION RAIN WATER HARVESTING
75%
WATER CONSERVATION RAIN WATER HARVESTING
75%
WATER CONSERVATION RAIN WATER HARVESTING
75%
WATER CONSERVATION RAIN WATER HARVESTING
75%
WATER CONSERVATION RAIN WATER HARVESTING
75%
WATER CONSERVATION RAIN WATER HARVESTING
75%
WATER CONSERVATION RAIN WATER HARVESTING
85%
WATER CONSERVATION RAIN WATER HARVESTING
85%
WATER CONSERVATION RAIN WATER HARVESTING
85%
WATER SUPPLY
23%
WATER SUPPLY
55%
WATER SUPPLY
56%
WATER SUPPLY
58%
WATER SUPPLY
59%
WATER SUPPLY
59%
WATER SUPPLY
59%
WATER SUPPLY
59%
WATER SUPPLY
59%
WATER SUPPLY
59%
WATER SUPPLY
59%
WATER SUPPLY
59%
WATER SUPPLY
76%
WATER SUPPLY
76%
WATER SUPPLY
80%
Project Professionals
CA ALOK KUMAR AGRAWAL
STATUTORY CA
NAVIN KOTHARI
QUARTERLY CA
RAJENDRA JAIN
ENGINEER
SHASHIKANT KUJUR
ARCHITECT
Project Analysis

360° Project Intelligence

Comprehensive analysis across regulatory, livability, market, filing activity, and market readiness dimensions.

Regulatory
43
6 of 14 checks · Weak Signals
Livability
69
Amleshwar North · Moderate Signals
Legal
2
2 legal order(s) · 7 nearby
Filing Activity
270
222 docs · 48 quarterly updates
Market Readiness
25
New · due Dec 2023
Area Livability

Livability of Amleshwar North

Eighteen environmental, infrastructure and amenity parameters for the nearest mapped area (Amleshwar North — 9.72 km from this project). Click any parameter for the underlying readings, thresholds and what they mean.



🏠 Livability Parameters

Latest readings for Amleshwar North. Only parameters with available data are shown below. Based on the latest readings for Amleshwar North.

B
Composite Score
68.6 /100
Good

🌬️ Air Quality

Final Score: 92.4/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Air Quality?AQI summarizes PM2.5, PM10 and gases. Lower pollution values improve public health outcomes.
AQI
69
Satisfactory
PM2.5
23.6 µg/m³
≤ 40
PM10
146.5 µg/m³
≤ 60
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
PM2.5 23.6 µg/m³ ≤ 40
Good
PM10 146.5 µg/m³ ≤ 60
Concern
NO₂ 22.0 µg/m³ ≤ 40
Good
💡 What does this mean for you?Cleaner air lowers respiratory burden and improves outdoor comfort.

💧 Water Quality

Final Score: 48.1/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Water Quality?Water quality combines chemistry, supply duration and contamination markers.
TDS
412 ppm
≤ 500
pH
7.04
6.5–8.5
Supply
7.1 hr/day
≥ 8 hr
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
TDS 412 ppm ≤ 500
Good
Fluoride 0.87 mg/L ≤ 1.0
Good
Turbidity 5.5 NTU ≤ 1
Concern
💡 What does this mean for you?Better supply quality and consistency reduces dependence on tanker/groundwater fallback.

🧹 Sanitation

Final Score: 75.3/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Sanitation?Sanitation reflects ODF status, sewage treatment and waste management regularity.
ODF
ODF++
ODF++
Sewage Coverage
62%
≥ 80%
Drainage
67%
≥ 90%
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
ODF Status ODF++ ODF++
Info
Sewage Coverage 62% ≥ 80%
Concern
Drainage Coverage 67% ≥ 90%
Concern
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher sanitation maturity lowers disease exposure and neighborhood nuisance.

🛣️ Infrastructure

Final Score: 39.6/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Infrastructure?Infrastructure score combines land use, urbanization, built form, night lights and terrain indicators.
Built-up
38.9%
Balanced band
Tree Cover
16.5%
≥ 15%
Urbanization
21.9
Higher better
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Built-up (LULC) 38.9% 40-70%
Contextual
Impervious Surface 29.3% < 70%
Good
NDVI Mean 0.228 > 0.3
Concern
💡 What does this mean for you?Balanced built + green mix usually improves long-term livability resilience.

🏥 Amenities

Final Score: 30.3/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Amenities?Amenity score captures daily-access services in walk/short-drive radii.
Hospitals 500m
0
Target ≥1
Schools 1km
0
Target ≥3
Parks 500m
0
Target ≥1
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Hospitals (500m) 0 ≥1
Concern
Schools (1km) 0 ≥3
Concern
Markets (1km) 4 ≥1
Good
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher local amenity density improves convenience and walkability.

🌳 Green Cover

Final Score: 61.6/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Green Cover?NDVI and vegetation structure are measured from satellite imagery to estimate neighborhood greenery.
NDVI Mean
0.364
Greenness index
Vegetation
56.7%
% green pixels
Dense Green
26.4%
Thick canopy
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
NDVI Mean 0.364 0.5 maps to score 100
Weighted 40%
Vegetation % 56.7% Direct % (cap 100)
Weighted 30%
Dense Green % 26.4% Scaled from 50%
Weighted 20%
Parks within 500m 2 Count * 33 (cap 100)
Weighted 10%
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher green metrics typically reduce heat stress and improve comfort.

🔊 Noise

Final Score: 95.4/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Noise?Noise uses measured day/night dB compared to CPCB zone limits.
Day dB
43.9
vs CPCB day limit
Night dB
39.5
vs CPCB night limit
Zone
residential
CPCB class
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Day Noise 43.9 dB ≤ 55.0 dB
Good
Night Noise 39.5 dB ≤ 45.0 dB
Good
Nearest Highway 1,682 m Higher usually quieter
Info
💡 What does this mean for you?Chronic high noise impacts stress, sleep quality and perceived comfort.

🌊 Flood Risk

Final Score: 81.8/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Flood Risk?Flood risk combines river exposure and local waterlogging vulnerability.
Overall Risk
Low
Lower is safer
River Risk
Low
Lower is safer
Waterlogging
Low
Lower is safer
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Overall Risk Low Low preferred
Info
River Flood Risk Low Low preferred
Info
Waterlogging Risk Low Low preferred
Info
💡 What does this mean for you?Lower flood risk means less disruption and lower hazard exposure.

🏚️ Earthquake Risk

Final Score: 87.7/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Earthquake Risk?Earthquake profile uses seismic zone, PGA and soil/liquefaction risk factors.
Seismic Zone
II
Lower risk zone preferred
Risk Level
Low
Low preferred
Liquefaction
Low
Low preferred
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Seismic Zone II II preferred
Info
Risk Level Low Low preferred
Info
PGA (475yr) 0.067 Lower preferred
Info
💡 What does this mean for you?Lower seismic hazard reduces structural and insurance risk exposure.

🌡️ Land Surface Temp

Final Score: 65.4/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Land Surface Temp?Land Surface Temperature reflects heat-island intensity from satellite thermal bands.
LST Mean
28.7°C
Lower better
LST Min
13.7°C
Context
LST Max
38.4°C
Lower better
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
LST Mean 28.7°C 20°C best / 45°C worst
Weighted by formula
LST Score 65.4 0-100
Computed
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
LST Mean (°C) 30.2 27.1 28.7
LST Min (°C) 13.8 13.5 13.7
LST Max (°C) 36.2 40.5 38.4
LST Score 59.3 71.5 65.4
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher heat exposure affects comfort, cooling load and health risk.

🏗️ Built-up Density

Final Score: 67.3/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Built-up Density?Built-up density measures extent of developed surface versus open space.
Built-up %
32.7%
Lower better
Open Space %
67.3%
Higher better
Built-up Score
67.3
0-100
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Built-up % 32.7% Inverse scoring
Score = 100 - builtup%
Open Space % 67.3% Context
Info
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Built-up % 43.7% 21.6% 32.7%
Open Space % 56.3% 78.4% 67.3%
Built-up Score 56.3 78.4 67.3
💡 What does this mean for you?Very high built-up often raises heat and runoff while reducing open environmental buffers.

💡 Night-time Lights

Final Score: 21.3/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Night-time Lights?Nighttime lights are a proxy for economic activity and electrification intensity.
Avg Radiance
10.66
Higher better
Max Radiance
20.96
Context
NTL Score
21.3
0-100
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Avg Radiance 10.66 Scaled to 50
Score = min(100, avg/50*100)
NTL Score 21.3 0-100
Computed
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Avg Radiance 12.19 9.13 10.66
Max Radiance 12.00 29.93 20.96
NTL Score 24.4 18.3 21.3
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher radiance often indicates stronger urban activity but can correlate with light pollution.

🏞️ Water Bodies

Final Score: 25.8/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Water Bodies?Water-bodies score reflects permanent and seasonal water presence in the analysis radius.
Permanent Water
7.38%
Higher generally better
Seasonal Water
77.72%
Context
Water Score
81.7
0-100
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Permanent Water % 7.38% 70% weight
Scaled against 10%
Seasonal Water % 77.72% 30% weight
Scaled against 20%
Water Score 81.7 0-100
Computed
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Permanent Water % 6.66% 8.09% 7.38%
Seasonal Water % 83.44% 72.00% 77.72%
Water Score 23.3 28.3 81.7
💡 What does this mean for you?Water presence can support cooling, recharge and ecological quality.

👥 Population Density

Final Score: 92.2/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Population Density?Population density indicates urban crowding pressure around the area.
Population
20,906
Estimated residents
Density/km²
1,561.2
Lower better for this score
Score
92.2
0-100
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Density/km² 1,561.2 Inverse scale up to 20,000
Lower -> higher score
Score 92.2 0-100
Computed
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Population Total 5,809 36,002 20,906
Density / km² 1,849.0 1,273.3 1,561.2
Pop Density Score 90.8 93.6 92.2
💡 What does this mean for you?Extremely high density can increase pressure on services and mobility.

⛲ Groundwater

Final Score: 66.1/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Groundwater?Groundwater score combines moisture, recharge, drought and trend indicators.
Soil Moisture
152.654
Higher better
Recharge
1.06
Higher better
PDSI
2.49
Higher better
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Soil Moisture 152.654 30% weight
Scaled
Recharge 1.06 25% weight
Scaled
PDSI 2.49 20% weight
Scaled
SM Trend -11.5935 15% weight
Scaled
Precipitation 1,567.48 10% weight
Scaled
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Soil Moisture 157.950 147.357 152.654
Recharge Estimate 1.06 1.06 1.06
PDSI 2.13 2.85 2.49
Groundwater Score 59.2 72.9 60.9
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher score suggests better long-term aquifer and moisture support conditions.

🌧️ Waterlogging

↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Waterlogging?Waterlogging combines topography, imperviousness and wetness indices across nearby grid cells.
Grid Count
66
Sampled cells
Avg Susceptibility
52.2
Lower is safer
High Risk Grids
59
High / Very High
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTargetStatus
Avg Susceptibility 52.2 < 40
Concern
Avg Slope 2.33° > 1°
Good
Avg Impervious 3.5% < 70%
Good
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher susceptibility and low slope increase monsoon water stagnation probability.

🚶 Walkability & Safety

↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Walkability & Safety?OSM amenity metrics reflect pedestrian, safety and urban accessibility infrastructure.
Footpaths
1
Higher better
Street Lamps
0
Higher better
Police/Fire Access
1
Presence
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Footpaths (500m) 1 ≥ 3
Concern
Sidewalk Roads (1km) 2 ≥ 5
Concern
Nearest Police Station — m ≤ 2000m
Context
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher OSM accessibility/safety features generally improve everyday livability.

⚠️ Risk Factors

↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Risk Factors?Nearby hazards and sensitive risk points mapped around this area.
Total Risks
3
Mapped points
Scoring Breakdown
CategoryRiskDistance / SeverityMeaning
Accessibility Far from hospital 1260 m / Medium Nearest hospital >5km away
Accessibility No bus service 1682 m / Medium Area lacks regular public bus service
Water_drainage Open drainage channel 545 m / Low Uncovered drainage near residential area
💡 What does this mean for you?Closer and severe risks can affect insurance, resale and safety comfort.

🌬️ Air Quality: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

💧 Water Quality: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🧹 Sanitation: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🛣️ Infrastructure: Infrastructure Score Formula

Formula: Composite weighted model from GHSL/ESA/VIIRS/Terrain features
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Urbanization index21.8920%SMOD
Built-up balance38.9%15%Best in moderate band
NTL stability39.6%15%Power/activity consistency
Avg building height4.59 m10%Vertical infra proxy
Impervious %29.3%10%Moderate is optimal
Radiance6.1310%Development proxy
Slope0.88°10%Flatter is better
Green support16.5%10%Tree + grass contribution
This is the same weighted structure used in Livability Infrastructure model.
Final: 39.63 / 100

🏥 Amenities: Amenity Score Breakdown

Formula: Each amenity category is capped at 100, final score is averaged across categories
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Hospitals 500m0 * 33Cap 100Health access
Schools 1km0 * 20Cap 100Education access
Markets 1km4 * 33Cap 100Daily needs
Parks 500m0 * 33Cap 100Open space
Transit 1km0 * 50Cap 100Mobility
Category multipliers mirror the Livability snapshot logic.
Final: Final from amenity_scores table

🌳 Green Cover: Green Score Formula

Formula: Score = (NDVI*40%) + (Vegetation*30%) + (Dense Green*20%) + (Parks*10%)
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
NDVI component0.364 => 72.840%29.1
Vegetation component56.7% => 56.730%17.0
Dense green component26.4% => 52.820%10.6
Parks component2 => 66.010%6.6
This matches the Livability GreenCover model weighting logic.
Final: 63.29 / 100

🔊 Noise: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🌊 Flood Risk: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🏚️ Earthquake Risk: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🌡️ Land Surface Temp: LST Score Formula

Formula: Score = ((45 - LST Mean) / 25) * 100, clipped to [0,100]
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
LST Mean28.65 °CReference20°C best, 45°C worst
Lower land surface temperature means better livability.
Final: 65.40 / 100

🏗️ Built-up Density: Built-up Score Formula

Formula: Score = 100 - Built-up %
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Built-up %32.7%InverseLower is better
Dense concrete surfaces reduce infiltration and increase heat islands.
Final: 67.33 / 100

💡 Night-time Lights: Night-time Lights Formula

Formula: Score = min(100, (Avg Radiance / 50) * 100)
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Avg Radiance10.66Scale 0-50Higher indicates activity
Higher night radiance generally tracks electrification and economic intensity.
Final: 21.32 / 100

🏞️ Water Bodies: Water Bodies Score Formula

Formula: Score = (Permanent Water Score * 70%) + (Seasonal Water Score * 30%)
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Permanent water7.38%70%Scaled against 10% benchmark
Seasonal water77.72%30%Scaled against 20% benchmark
Permanent water has higher score weight than seasonal water.
Final: 81.66 / 100

👥 Population Density: Population Density Formula

Formula: Score = ((20000 - density_per_km²) / 20000) * 100, clipped to [0,100]
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Density1,561.2 /km²Inverse scaleLower density -> higher score
This follows the Livability PopulationDensity model.
Final: 92.19 / 100

⛲ Groundwater: Groundwater Score Formula

Formula: Weighted: Soil Moisture 30% + Recharge 25% + PDSI 20% + Trend 15% + Precipitation 10%
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Soil moisture152.65430%Scaled to 0-200
Recharge estimate1.0625%Scaled -200 to +400
PDSI2.4920%Scaled -4 to +4
SM trend-11.593515%Scaled -50 to +50
Precipitation1,567.4810%Scaled 800 to 1800
Exactly reused from Livability Groundwater model logic.
Final: 60.93 / 100

🌧️ Waterlogging: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🚶 Walkability & Safety: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

⚠️ Risk Factors: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

View full livability report for Amleshwar North →

Compliance Status

RERA registration, filings, and compliance flags based on public CG-RERA records.

Compliance Status Based on public CG-RERA records
2 Passed
1 Warning
1 Issue(s)
2 N/A
RERA Registration Active
Reg No. PCGRERA231020001153 — Status: New
Section 3 · Source · RERA Official Page
No Penalty Orders
2 order(s) on record, none with penalty sections (Sec 38/39/40/59/61/63)
Sec 38–63 · Source
1 Order(s) in Last 12 Months
Recent: M-COM-2025-02744
Source · M-COM-2025-02744
Completion Overdue
Was due 31 Dec 2023 — overdue by ~28 month(s)
Section 4 · Source
Quarterly Updates Not Available
No compliance snapshot data on record
Section 11 · Source
Annual Audit Not Available
No compliance snapshot data on record
Section 4(2)(l)(D) · Source
Each check is based on publicly available CG-RERA portal data as of Apr 2026. How this works →

Details

Registration, professional team, bank, promoters, and compliance history.

Registration Details
RERA Number
PCGRERA231020001153
Status
New
Project Type
Residential Plotted Development
Approved Date
23 Oct 2020
Original End Date
30 Sep 2023
EWS Category
NO
Construction Cost
₹ 71400000
Land Cost
₹ 34927000
Proposed Completion
31 Dec 2023
Authorised Person
chaitanya baghel
View on Map
Professional Team
RoleNameLicense / Membership
Statutory CA CA ALOK KUMAR AGRAWAL 413331
Quarterly CA NAVIN KOTHARI 421026
Engineer RAJENDRA JAIN 330/98
Architect SHASHIKANT KUJUR CA/2018/95221
Promoters
C
CHAITANYA BAGHEL Individual
C
CHAITANYA BAGHEL

Legal Orders & Cases

RERA legal orders, complaints, and case statistics filed against this project.

2
Total Cases
1
Last 12 Months
1
Older Cases
2
PDFs Available
Legal Orders (2)
ComplaintApplicantSectionDateSourcePDF
M-COM-2025-02744 CG-RERA - 28 May 2025 This project
SM-EXP-2024-02485 CG-RERA - 09 Sep 2024 This project

Location

Project address, coordinates, and nearby places.

Location Details
Address
VILLAGE-JANJGIRI TEHSIL-DHAMDA, DIST- DURG
District
Durg
Tehsil
Dhamdha
Coordinates
21.2410350, 81.4815219 View on Map
Neighborhood Intelligence

Explore nearby infrastructure around this project. Toggle categories to show/hide on the map.

Neighborhood Map 3 km radius
RERA Projects Near vitthal greens 7 found within 3 km
# Project District Status Distance
1 SAI VILLAS & APARTMENT PHASE II Durg Ongoing 0.23 km
2 sai villas classic Durg New 0.33 km
3 SAI VILLAS CLASSIC PHASE - ii Durg New 0.39 km
4 sb centrum Durg New 0.60 km
5 sb centrum phase II Durg New 0.79 km
6 sarthak greens Durg Ongoing 1.80 km
7 sarthak homes Durg Ongoing 2.55 km

Buyer Checklist

Documents and verifications a buyer should review before purchase.

Buyer Document Verification Checklist

Key documents a buyer should verify before purchasing in this project. Items marked Available have data on Seemankan.

7/14 verified
  • RERA Registration Certificate Available
    Confirms the project is registered with RERA CG. Verify registration number, validity dates, and project details on the RERA portal.
    RERA No: PCGRERA231020001153
    View on RERA Portal
  • Promoter Registration Certificate Verify Independently
    Builder / colonizer company registration certificate. Confirms the promoter entity is a registered firm, company, or society.
  • Approved Building / Sanction Plan Verify Independently
    Building plan sanctioned by the local authority. Verify floor count, setbacks, and FSI compliance.
  • Layout Plan Verify Independently
    Approved layout showing plot divisions, roads, open spaces, and common areas.
  • Title Deed / Ownership Proof Verify Independently
    Proof that the promoter legally owns the land. Verify via Sub-Registrar records.
  • Encumbrance Certificate Verify Independently
    Confirms the property is free from legal dues, mortgages, or liens. Obtain from Sub-Registrar office.
  • Land Use / Diversion Certificate Verify Independently
    Required if land was converted from agricultural to non-agricultural use.
  • Architect Certificate Available
    Certification from a registered architect confirming structural plans and compliance.
    View View View +12 more
  • Structural Engineer Certificate Available
    Certification from a structural engineer confirming building safety and load-bearing capacity.
    View View View +12 more
  • CA Financial Certificate Available
    Chartered Accountant certificate on financial status, project cost estimates, and fund utilization.
    View View View +14 more
  • Commencement Certificate Available
    Permission to begin construction issued by the local authority after plan approval.
    Download Download Download +1 more
  • NOCs (No Objection Certificates) Verify Independently
    NOCs from fire department, environment, water supply, electricity board, and other authorities.
  • Project Brochure / Specification Available
    Official brochure with unit types, amenities, and specifications. Compare with actual delivery.
    View View View +14 more
  • RERA Compliance Orders Available
    Check if any orders, penalties, or directions have been issued against this project by RERA.
    2 order(s) on record — review in Legal tab
Disclaimer: This checklist is for informational purposes only. "Available" means Seemankan has a copy from the RERA portal — it does not constitute legal verification. Always verify original documents with the concerned authorities and consult a legal advisor before making a purchase decision.

Risk Zone Within 5 km

Buffer zones (water bodies, airport restrictions) and risk sites (landfills, waste processing) detected within 3 km (immediate) and 5 km (extended) of the project.

0
Risk zones (within 5 km)
3 km: 0 3–5 km: 0
0
Water bodies (river/nala/lake)
3 km: 0 3–5 km: 0
0
Landfill / waste sites
3 km: 0 3–5 km: 0
0
Airport buffer overlap
3 km: 0 3–5 km: 0
Risk Zone Map (3 km & 5 km rings) Project marker centered
All Clear

No mapped risk zones within 3 km of this project.

Reviews

Verified buyer reviews and ratings for this project.

No reviews yet. Be the first to review this project!

Login to Write a Review

You need to be signed in to submit a review for this project.

Login or Register