Home / RERA Projects / SAMRAT VATIKA
ONGOING Residential Development RERA Page Project Website
GENERATE REPORT

SAMRAT VATIKA

Compliance Status
Partial Compliance
21.2137, 81.6525 Explore area
District
Raipur
Area
—
Promoter
JAIN GROUNDWORKS PVT. LTD.
Project Information
Promoter JAIN GROUNDWORKS PVT. LTD.
Type Residential Development
Status Ongoing
Completion 31 Dec 2019
RERA No. PCGRERA280618000366
Registered 28 Jun 2018
Original End 31 Dec 2019
Total Units 32 · 30 sold
EWS Category NO
Construction Cost ₹ 68000000
Land Cost ₹ 42180000
Authorised Person GOUTAM CHAND JAIN
Website www.jaingroundworks.co.in
Address DAWARA COLONY, TIKRAPARA, RAIPUR (C.G.)
At a Glance
32
Total Units
30
Units Sold
2
Unsold
2
Legal Cases
Dec 2019
Target Completion
100%
Completion
Amenities & Facilities (218)
0
0%
BOUNDARY WALL
50%
BOUNDARY WALL
65%
BOUNDARY WALL
75%
BOUNDARY WALL
75%
BOUNDARY WALL
78%
BOUNDARY WALL
82%
BOUNDARY WALL
85%
BOUNDARY WALL
89%
BOUNDARY WALL
90%
BOUNDARY WALL
100%
BOUNDARY WALL
100%
BOUNDARY WALL
100%
BOUNDARY WALL
100%
BOUNDARY WALL
100%
BOUNDARY WALL
100%
BOUNDARY WALL
100%
BOUNDARY WALL
100%
BOUNDARY WALL
100%
BOUNDARY WALL
100%
ELECTRIC METER ROOM,SUB STATION,RECIEVING STATIOM
0%
ELECTRIC METER ROOM,SUB STATION,RECIEVING STATIOM
15%
ELECTRIC METER ROOM,SUB STATION,RECIEVING STATIOM
30%
ELECTRIC METER ROOM,SUB STATION,RECIEVING STATIOM
40%
ELECTRIC METER ROOM,SUB STATION,RECIEVING STATIOM
48%
ELECTRIC METER ROOM,SUB STATION,RECIEVING STATIOM
49%
ELECTRIC METER ROOM,SUB STATION,RECIEVING STATIOM
58%
ENERGY MAANAGEMENT
0%
ENERGY MAANAGEMENT
15%
ENERGY MAANAGEMENT
15%
ENERGY MAANAGEMENT
30%
ENERGY MAANAGEMENT
40%
ENERGY MAANAGEMENT
48%
ENERGY MAANAGEMENT
49%
ENERGY MAANAGEMENT
58%
ENERGY MAANAGEMENT
60%
ENERGY MAANAGEMENT
100%
ENERGY MAANAGEMENT
100%
ENERGY MAANAGEMENT
100%
ENERGY MAANAGEMENT
100%
ENERGY MAANAGEMENT
100%
ENERGY MAANAGEMENT
100%
ENERGY MAANAGEMENT
100%
ENERGY MAANAGEMENT
100%
ENERGY MAANAGEMENT
100%
ENERGY MAANAGEMENT
100%
FIRE PROTECTION AND FIRE SAFETY REQUIREMENTS
0%
FIRE PROTECTION AND FIRE SAFETY REQUIREMENTS
45%
FIRE PROTECTION AND FIRE SAFETY REQUIREMENTS
75%
FIRE PROTECTION AND FIRE SAFETY REQUIREMENTS
75%
FIRE PROTECTION AND FIRE SAFETY REQUIREMENTS
78%
FIRE PROTECTION AND FIRE SAFETY REQUIREMENTS
80%
FIRE PROTECTION AND FIRE SAFETY REQUIREMENTS
80%
FIRE PROTECTION AND FIRE SAFETY REQUIREMENTS
80%
FIRE PROTECTION AND FIRE SAFETY REQUIREMENTS
80%
FIRE PROTECTION AND FIRE SAFETY REQUIREMENTS
100%
FIRE PROTECTION AND FIRE SAFETY REQUIREMENTS
100%
FIRE PROTECTION AND FIRE SAFETY REQUIREMENTS
100%
FIRE PROTECTION AND FIRE SAFETY REQUIREMENTS
100%
FIRE PROTECTION AND FIRE SAFETY REQUIREMENTS
100%
FIRE PROTECTION AND FIRE SAFETY REQUIREMENTS
100%
FIRE PROTECTION AND FIRE SAFETY REQUIREMENTS
100%
FIRE PROTECTION AND FIRE SAFETY REQUIREMENTS
100%
FIRE PROTECTION AND FIRE SAFETY REQUIREMENTS
100%
FIRE PROTECTION AND FIRE SAFETY REQUIREMENTS
100%
INTERNAL ROADS AND FOOTPATHS
0%
INTERNAL ROADS AND FOOTPATHS
10%
INTERNAL ROADS AND FOOTPATHS
15%
INTERNAL ROADS AND FOOTPATHS
25%
INTERNAL ROADS AND FOOTPATHS
35%
INTERNAL ROADS AND FOOTPATHS
45%
INTERNAL ROADS AND FOOTPATHS
48%
INTERNAL ROADS AND FOOTPATHS
55%
INTERNAL ROADS AND FOOTPATHS
60%
INTERNAL ROADS AND FOOTPATHS
100%
INTERNAL ROADS AND FOOTPATHS
100%
INTERNAL ROADS AND FOOTPATHS
100%
INTERNAL ROADS AND FOOTPATHS
100%
INTERNAL ROADS AND FOOTPATHS
100%
INTERNAL ROADS AND FOOTPATHS
100%
INTERNAL ROADS AND FOOTPATHS
100%
INTERNAL ROADS AND FOOTPATHS
100%
INTERNAL ROADS AND FOOTPATHS
100%
INTERNAL ROADS AND FOOTPATHS
100%
LANDSCAPING AND TREE PLANTING
0%
LANDSCAPING AND TREE PLANTING
0%
LANDSCAPING AND TREE PLANTING
0%
LANDSCAPING AND TREE PLANTING
0%
LANDSCAPING AND TREE PLANTING
0%
LANDSCAPING AND TREE PLANTING
5%
LANDSCAPING AND TREE PLANTING
7%
LANDSCAPING AND TREE PLANTING
12%
LANDSCAPING AND TREE PLANTING
17%
LANDSCAPING AND TREE PLANTING
100%
LANDSCAPING AND TREE PLANTING
100%
LANDSCAPING AND TREE PLANTING
100%
LANDSCAPING AND TREE PLANTING
100%
LANDSCAPING AND TREE PLANTING
100%
LANDSCAPING AND TREE PLANTING
100%
LANDSCAPING AND TREE PLANTING
100%
LANDSCAPING AND TREE PLANTING
100%
LANDSCAPING AND TREE PLANTING
100%
LANDSCAPING AND TREE PLANTING
100%
OPEN PARKING
0%
OPEN PARKING
10%
OPEN PARKING
10%
OPEN PARKING
25%
OPEN PARKING
35%
OPEN PARKING
37%
OPEN PARKING
45%
OPEN PARKING
48%
OPEN PARKING
100%
OPEN PARKING
100%
OPEN PARKING
100%
OPEN PARKING
100%
OPEN PARKING
100%
OPEN PARKING
100%
OPEN PARKING
100%
OPEN PARKING
100%
OPEN PARKING
100%
OPEN PARKING
100%
OTHER
50%
SEWERAGE
10%
SEWERAGE
25%
SEWERAGE
35%
SEWERAGE
40%
SEWERAGE
50%
SEWERAGE
55%
SEWERAGE
55%
SEWERAGE
59%
SEWERAGE
60%
SEWERAGE
100%
SEWERAGE
100%
SEWERAGE
100%
SEWERAGE
100%
SEWERAGE
100%
SEWERAGE
100%
SEWERAGE
100%
SEWERAGE
100%
SEWERAGE
100%
SEWERAGE
100%
STORM WATER DRAINS
0%
STORM WATER DRAINS
10%
STORM WATER DRAINS
15%
STORM WATER DRAINS
25%
STORM WATER DRAINS
38%
STORM WATER DRAINS
42%
STORM WATER DRAINS
43%
STORM WATER DRAINS
59%
STORM WATER DRAINS
60%
STORM WATER DRAINS
100%
STORM WATER DRAINS
100%
STORM WATER DRAINS
100%
STORM WATER DRAINS
100%
STORM WATER DRAINS
100%
STORM WATER DRAINS
100%
STORM WATER DRAINS
100%
STORM WATER DRAINS
100%
STORM WATER DRAINS
100%
STORM WATER DRAINS
100%
STREET LIGHTING
0%
STREET LIGHTING
0%
STREET LIGHTING
0%
STREET LIGHTING
0%
STREET LIGHTING
0%
STREET LIGHTING
0%
STREET LIGHTING
0%
STREET LIGHTING
0%
STREET LIGHTING
0%
STREET LIGHTING
100%
STREET LIGHTING
100%
STREET LIGHTING
100%
STREET LIGHTING
100%
STREET LIGHTING
100%
STREET LIGHTING
100%
STREET LIGHTING
100%
STREET LIGHTING
100%
STREET LIGHTING
100%
STREET LIGHTING
100%
TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL OF SEWERAGE AND SULLAGE WAT
0%
WATER CONSERVATION RAIN WATER HARVESTING
0%
WATER CONSERVATION RAIN WATER HARVESTING
0%
WATER CONSERVATION RAIN WATER HARVESTING
0%
WATER CONSERVATION RAIN WATER HARVESTING
35%
WATER CONSERVATION RAIN WATER HARVESTING
45%
WATER CONSERVATION RAIN WATER HARVESTING
49%
WATER CONSERVATION RAIN WATER HARVESTING
50%
WATER CONSERVATION RAIN WATER HARVESTING
58%
WATER CONSERVATION RAIN WATER HARVESTING
60%
WATER CONSERVATION RAIN WATER HARVESTING
100%
WATER CONSERVATION RAIN WATER HARVESTING
100%
WATER CONSERVATION RAIN WATER HARVESTING
100%
WATER CONSERVATION RAIN WATER HARVESTING
100%
WATER CONSERVATION RAIN WATER HARVESTING
100%
WATER CONSERVATION RAIN WATER HARVESTING
100%
WATER CONSERVATION RAIN WATER HARVESTING
100%
WATER CONSERVATION RAIN WATER HARVESTING
100%
WATER CONSERVATION RAIN WATER HARVESTING
100%
WATER CONSERVATION RAIN WATER HARVESTING
100%
WATER SUPPLY
0%
WATER SUPPLY
10%
WATER SUPPLY
20%
WATER SUPPLY
35%
WATER SUPPLY
45%
WATER SUPPLY
50%
WATER SUPPLY
52%
WATER SUPPLY
58%
WATER SUPPLY
60%
WATER SUPPLY
100%
WATER SUPPLY
100%
WATER SUPPLY
100%
WATER SUPPLY
100%
WATER SUPPLY
100%
WATER SUPPLY
100%
WATER SUPPLY
100%
WATER SUPPLY
100%
WATER SUPPLY
100%
WATER SUPPLY
100%
Project Professionals
SHUBHAM JAIN
STATUTORY CA
TILOK MUNDRA
QUARTERLY CA
AAKASH JAIN
ENGINEER
SHASHIKANT KUJUR
ARCHITECT
Project Analysis

360° Project Intelligence

Comprehensive analysis across regulatory, livability, market, filing activity, and market readiness dimensions.

Regulatory
86
12 of 14 checks · Strong Signals
Livability
58
Pachpedi Naka · Moderate Signals
Legal
2
2 legal order(s) · 30 nearby
Filing Activity
380
308 docs · 72 quarterly updates
Market Readiness
94
Ongoing · due Dec 2019
Area Livability

Livability of Pachpedi Naka

Eighteen environmental, infrastructure and amenity parameters for the nearest mapped area (Pachpedi Naka — 0.14 km from this project). Click any parameter for the underlying readings, thresholds and what they mean.



🏠 Livability Parameters

Latest readings for Pachpedi Naka. Only parameters with available data are shown below. Based on the latest readings for Pachpedi Naka.

C
Composite Score
58.5 /100
Average

🌬️ Air Quality

Final Score: 84.4/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Air Quality?AQI summarizes PM2.5, PM10 and gases. Lower pollution values improve public health outcomes.
AQI
89
Satisfactory
PM2.5
26.4 µg/m³
≤ 40
PM10
300.7 µg/m³
≤ 60
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
PM2.5 26.4 µg/m³ ≤ 40
Good
PM10 300.7 µg/m³ ≤ 60
Concern
NO₂ 22.9 µg/m³ ≤ 40
Good
💡 What does this mean for you?Cleaner air lowers respiratory burden and improves outdoor comfort.

💧 Water Quality

Final Score: 68.2/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Water Quality?Water quality combines chemistry, supply duration and contamination markers.
TDS
347 ppm
≤ 500
pH
7.33
6.5–8.5
Supply
7.0 hr/day
≥ 8 hr
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
TDS 347 ppm ≤ 500
Good
Fluoride 0.76 mg/L ≤ 1.0
Good
Turbidity 4.8 NTU ≤ 1
Concern
💡 What does this mean for you?Better supply quality and consistency reduces dependence on tanker/groundwater fallback.

🧹 Sanitation

Final Score: 69.0/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Sanitation?Sanitation reflects ODF status, sewage treatment and waste management regularity.
ODF
ODF+
ODF++
Sewage Coverage
60%
≥ 80%
Drainage
68%
≥ 90%
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
ODF Status ODF+ ODF++
Info
Sewage Coverage 60% ≥ 80%
Concern
Drainage Coverage 68% ≥ 90%
Concern
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher sanitation maturity lowers disease exposure and neighborhood nuisance.

🛣️ Infrastructure

Final Score: 76.8/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Infrastructure?Infrastructure score combines land use, urbanization, built form, night lights and terrain indicators.
Built-up
61.4%
Balanced band
Tree Cover
4.6%
≥ 15%
Urbanization
96.1
Higher better
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Built-up (LULC) 61.4% 40-70%
Contextual
Impervious Surface 40.8% < 70%
Good
NDVI Mean 0.230 > 0.3
Concern
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Built-up (LULC) % 66.5% 56.4% 61.4%
Tree Cover % 3.4% 5.7% 4.6%
Urbanization Index 100.0 92.1 96.1
Infra Score 78.6 75.1 78.6
💡 What does this mean for you?Balanced built + green mix usually improves long-term livability resilience.

🏥 Amenities

Final Score: 92.3/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Amenities?Amenity score captures daily-access services in walk/short-drive radii.
Hospitals 500m
7
Target ≥1
Schools 1km
5
Target ≥3
Parks 500m
2
Target ≥1
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Hospitals (500m) 7 ≥1
Good
Schools (1km) 5 ≥3
Good
Markets (1km) 4 ≥1
Good
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher local amenity density improves convenience and walkability.

🌳 Green Cover

Final Score: 46.5/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Green Cover?NDVI and vegetation structure are measured from satellite imagery to estimate neighborhood greenery.
NDVI Mean
0.263
Greenness index
Vegetation
37.7%
% green pixels
Dense Green
13.9%
Thick canopy
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
NDVI Mean 0.263 0.5 maps to score 100
Weighted 40%
Vegetation % 37.7% Direct % (cap 100)
Weighted 30%
Dense Green % 13.9% Scaled from 50%
Weighted 20%
Parks within 500m 2 Count * 33 (cap 100)
Weighted 10%
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
NDVI Mean 0.251 0.275 0.263
Vegetation % 35.0% 40.4% 37.7%
Dense Green % 13.4% 14.3% 13.9%
Tree Canopy % 21.3% 21.0% 21.2%
Green Score 42.5 46.5 44.5
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher green metrics typically reduce heat stress and improve comfort.

🔊 Noise

Final Score: 57.5/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Noise?Noise uses measured day/night dB compared to CPCB zone limits.
Day dB
48.0
vs CPCB day limit
Night dB
48.5
vs CPCB night limit
Zone
CPCB class
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Day Noise 48.0 dB ≤ 55.0 dB
Good
Night Noise 48.5 dB ≤ 45.0 dB
Concern
Nearest Highway 1,179 m Higher usually quieter
Info
💡 What does this mean for you?Chronic high noise impacts stress, sleep quality and perceived comfort.

🌊 Flood Risk

Final Score: 10.0/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Flood Risk?Flood risk combines river exposure and local waterlogging vulnerability.
Overall Risk
Lowest
Lower is safer
River Risk
Low
Lower is safer
Waterlogging
Low
Lower is safer
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Overall Risk Lowest Low preferred
Info
River Flood Risk Low Low preferred
Info
Waterlogging Risk Low Low preferred
Info
💡 What does this mean for you?Lower flood risk means less disruption and lower hazard exposure.

🏚️ Earthquake Risk

Final Score: 10.0/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Earthquake Risk?Earthquake profile uses seismic zone, PGA and soil/liquefaction risk factors.
Seismic Zone
Zone II
Lower risk zone preferred
Risk Level
Low
Low preferred
Liquefaction
None
Low preferred
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Seismic Zone Zone II II preferred
Info
Risk Level Low Low preferred
Info
PGA (475yr) 0.0155g Lower preferred
Info
💡 What does this mean for you?Lower seismic hazard reduces structural and insurance risk exposure.

🌡️ Land Surface Temp

Final Score: 56.7/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Land Surface Temp?Land Surface Temperature reflects heat-island intensity from satellite thermal bands.
LST Mean
30.8°C
Lower better
LST Min
18.0°C
Context
LST Max
40.2°C
Lower better
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
LST Mean 30.8°C 20°C best / 45°C worst
Weighted by formula
LST Score 56.7 0-100
Computed
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
LST Mean (°C) 31.1 30.6 30.8
LST Min (°C) 18.6 17.5 18.0
LST Max (°C) 40.5 39.9 40.2
LST Score 55.6 57.7 56.7
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher heat exposure affects comfort, cooling load and health risk.

🏗️ Built-up Density

Final Score: 38.6/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Built-up Density?Built-up density measures extent of developed surface versus open space.
Built-up %
61.4%
Lower better
Open Space %
38.6%
Higher better
Built-up Score
38.6
0-100
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Built-up % 61.4% Inverse scoring
Score = 100 - builtup%
Open Space % 38.6% Context
Info
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Built-up % 66.5% 56.4% 61.4%
Open Space % 33.5% 43.6% 38.6%
Built-up Score 33.5 43.6 38.6
💡 What does this mean for you?Very high built-up often raises heat and runoff while reducing open environmental buffers.

💡 Night-time Lights

Final Score: 53.8/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Night-time Lights?Nighttime lights are a proxy for economic activity and electrification intensity.
Avg Radiance
26.90
Higher better
Max Radiance
39.05
Context
NTL Score
53.8
0-100
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Avg Radiance 26.90 Scaled to 50
Score = min(100, avg/50*100)
NTL Score 53.8 0-100
Computed
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Avg Radiance 28.42 25.37 26.90
Max Radiance 39.70 38.40 39.05
NTL Score 56.8 50.7 53.8
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher radiance often indicates stronger urban activity but can correlate with light pollution.

🏞️ Water Bodies

Final Score: 57.6/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Water Bodies?Water-bodies score reflects permanent and seasonal water presence in the analysis radius.
Permanent Water
34.03%
Higher generally better
Seasonal Water
53.77%
Context
Water Score
100.0
0-100
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Permanent Water % 34.03% 70% weight
Scaled against 10%
Seasonal Water % 53.77% 30% weight
Scaled against 20%
Water Score 100.0 0-100
Computed
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Permanent Water % 0.00% 68.06% 34.03%
Seasonal Water % 10.07% 97.47% 53.77%
Water Score 15.1 100.0 100.0
💡 What does this mean for you?Water presence can support cooling, recharge and ecological quality.

👥 Population Density

Final Score: 74.5/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Population Density?Population density indicates urban crowding pressure around the area.
Population
75,393
Estimated residents
Density/km²
5,099.1
Lower better for this score
Score
74.5
0-100
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Density/km² 5,099.1 Inverse scale up to 20,000
Lower -> higher score
Score 74.5 0-100
Computed
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Population Total 17,195 133,591 75,393
Density / km² 5,473.4 4,724.8 5,099.1
Pop Density Score 72.6 76.4 74.5
💡 What does this mean for you?Extremely high density can increase pressure on services and mobility.

⛲ Groundwater

Final Score: 63.3/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Groundwater?Groundwater score combines moisture, recharge, drought and trend indicators.
Soil Moisture
134.649
Higher better
Recharge
-0.05
Higher better
PDSI
2.91
Higher better
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Soil Moisture 134.649 30% weight
Scaled
Recharge -0.05 25% weight
Scaled
PDSI 2.91 20% weight
Scaled
SM Trend 0.0000 15% weight
Scaled
Precipitation 1,871.53 10% weight
Scaled
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Soil Moisture 134.032 135.266 134.649
Recharge Estimate -0.14 0.04 -0.05
PDSI 2.97 2.86 2.91
Groundwater Score 63.4 63.3 63.3
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher score suggests better long-term aquifer and moisture support conditions.

🌧️ Waterlogging

↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Waterlogging?Waterlogging combines topography, imperviousness and wetness indices across nearby grid cells.
Grid Count
14
Sampled cells
Avg Susceptibility
50.8
Lower is safer
High Risk Grids
7
High / Very High
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTargetStatus
Avg Susceptibility 50.8 < 40
Concern
Avg Slope 2.87° > 1°
Good
Avg Impervious 62.3% < 70%
Good
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher susceptibility and low slope increase monsoon water stagnation probability.

🚶 Walkability & Safety

↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Walkability & Safety?OSM amenity metrics reflect pedestrian, safety and urban accessibility infrastructure.
Footpaths
0
Higher better
Street Lamps
0
Higher better
Police/Fire Access
1
Presence
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Footpaths (500m) 0 ≥ 3
Concern
Sidewalk Roads (1km) 0 ≥ 5
Concern
Nearest Police Station 1,499 m ≤ 2000m
Context
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher OSM accessibility/safety features generally improve everyday livability.

🌬️ Air Quality: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

💧 Water Quality: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🧹 Sanitation: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🛣️ Infrastructure: Infrastructure Score Formula

Formula: Composite weighted model from GHSL/ESA/VIIRS/Terrain features
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Urbanization index96.0520%SMOD
Built-up balance61.4%15%Best in moderate band
NTL stability72.0%15%Power/activity consistency
Avg building height7.11 m10%Vertical infra proxy
Impervious %40.8%10%Moderate is optimal
Radiance27.0210%Development proxy
Slope0.10°10%Flatter is better
Green support4.6%10%Tree + grass contribution
This is the same weighted structure used in Livability Infrastructure model.
Final: 78.63 / 100

🏥 Amenities: Amenity Score Breakdown

Formula: Each amenity category is capped at 100, final score is averaged across categories
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Hospitals 500m7 * 33Cap 100Health access
Schools 1km5 * 20Cap 100Education access
Markets 1km4 * 33Cap 100Daily needs
Parks 500m2 * 33Cap 100Open space
Transit 1km1 * 50Cap 100Mobility
Category multipliers mirror the Livability snapshot logic.
Final: Final from amenity_scores table

🌳 Green Cover: Green Score Formula

Formula: Score = (NDVI*40%) + (Vegetation*30%) + (Dense Green*20%) + (Parks*10%)
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
NDVI component0.263 => 52.640%21.0
Vegetation component37.7% => 37.730%11.3
Dense green component13.9% => 27.720%5.5
Parks component2 => 66.010%6.6
This matches the Livability GreenCover model weighting logic.
Final: 44.50 / 100

🔊 Noise: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🌊 Flood Risk: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🏚️ Earthquake Risk: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🌡️ Land Surface Temp: LST Score Formula

Formula: Score = ((45 - LST Mean) / 25) * 100, clipped to [0,100]
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
LST Mean30.83 °CReference20°C best, 45°C worst
Lower land surface temperature means better livability.
Final: 56.68 / 100

🏗️ Built-up Density: Built-up Score Formula

Formula: Score = 100 - Built-up %
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Built-up %61.4%InverseLower is better
Dense concrete surfaces reduce infiltration and increase heat islands.
Final: 38.56 / 100

💡 Night-time Lights: Night-time Lights Formula

Formula: Score = min(100, (Avg Radiance / 50) * 100)
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Avg Radiance26.90Scale 0-50Higher indicates activity
Higher night radiance generally tracks electrification and economic intensity.
Final: 53.79 / 100

🏞️ Water Bodies: Water Bodies Score Formula

Formula: Score = (Permanent Water Score * 70%) + (Seasonal Water Score * 30%)
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Permanent water34.03%70%Scaled against 10% benchmark
Seasonal water53.77%30%Scaled against 20% benchmark
Permanent water has higher score weight than seasonal water.
Final: 100.00 / 100

👥 Population Density: Population Density Formula

Formula: Score = ((20000 - density_per_km²) / 20000) * 100, clipped to [0,100]
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Density5,099.1 /km²Inverse scaleLower density -> higher score
This follows the Livability PopulationDensity model.
Final: 74.50 / 100

⛲ Groundwater: Groundwater Score Formula

Formula: Weighted: Soil Moisture 30% + Recharge 25% + PDSI 20% + Trend 15% + Precipitation 10%
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Soil moisture134.64930%Scaled to 0-200
Recharge estimate-0.0525%Scaled -200 to +400
PDSI2.9120%Scaled -4 to +4
SM trend0.000015%Scaled -50 to +50
Precipitation1,871.5310%Scaled 800 to 1800
Exactly reused from Livability Groundwater model logic.
Final: 63.31 / 100

🌧️ Waterlogging: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🚶 Walkability & Safety: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

View full livability report for Pachpedi Naka →

Compliance Status

RERA registration, filings, and compliance flags based on public CG-RERA records.

Compliance Status Based on public CG-RERA records
2 Passed
2 Issue(s)
2 N/A
RERA Registration Active
Reg No. PCGRERA280618000366 — Status: Ongoing
Section 3 · Source · RERA Official Page
2 Penalty Order(s)
Complaints: M-PRO-2023-01896, M-PRO-2021-01620
Sec 38–63 · Source · M-PRO-2023-01896 · M-PRO-2021-01620
No Recent Orders
No orders filed in the last 12 months (older: 2)
Source
Completion Overdue
Was due 31 Dec 2019 — overdue by ~77 month(s)
Section 4 · Source
Quarterly Updates Not Available
No compliance snapshot data on record
Section 11 · Source
Annual Audit Not Available
No compliance snapshot data on record
Section 4(2)(l)(D) · Source
Each check is based on publicly available CG-RERA portal data as of Apr 2026. How this works →
Other Projects by Same Promoter (1)
ProjectRERA No.StatusDistrictType
shourya navdwar PCGRERA040718000446 Ongoing Raipur Plotted Development

Details

Registration, professional team, bank, promoters, and compliance history.

Registration Details
RERA Number
PCGRERA280618000366
Status
Ongoing
Project Type
Residential Development
Approved Date
28 Jun 2018
Original End Date
31 Dec 2019
EWS Category
NO
Construction Cost
₹ 68000000
Land Cost
₹ 42180000
Proposed Completion
31 Dec 2019
Authorised Person
GOUTAM CHAND JAIN
Website
www.jaingroundworks.co.in
View on Map
Professional Team
RoleNameLicense / Membership
Statutory CA Shubham Jain 441617
Quarterly CA Tilok Mundra 424337
Engineer AAKASH JAIN 617/2014
Architect SHASHIKANT KUJUR CA/2018/95221
Promoters
J
jain groundworks pvt. ltd. Company
M
M/S JAIN GROUND WORKS PVT. LTD.

Legal Orders & Cases

RERA legal orders, complaints, and case statistics filed against this project.

2
Total Cases
0
Last 12 Months
2
Older Cases
2
PDFs Available
Legal Orders (2)
ComplaintApplicantSectionDateSourcePDF
M-PRO-2023-01896 VINOD KUMAR JAIN Section 19,Section 37,Section 38 11 Sep 2023 This project
M-PRO-2021-01620 SHRI SAMYAK JAIN Section 37,Section 38,Section14 (3) 26 May 2022 This project

Location

Project address, coordinates, and nearby places.

Location Details
Address
DAWARA COLONY, TIKRAPARA, RAIPUR (C.G.)
District
Raipur
Tehsil
Raipur
Coordinates
21.2137041, 81.6525038 View on Map
Neighborhood Intelligence

Explore nearby infrastructure around this project. Toggle categories to show/hide on the map.

Neighborhood Map 3 km radius
RERA Projects Near SAMRAT VATIKA 30 found within 3 km
# Project District Status Distance
1 MOSAIC BUSINESS & COMMUNITY CENTRE Raipur Ongoing 0.51 km
2 jainam park Raipur New 0.59 km
3 aviva green city Raipur Ongoing 0.60 km
4 aakrity Raipur Ongoing 0.60 km
5 LALGANGA REGALIA Raipur Ongoing 0.68 km
6 HAPPY HOMES Raipur Ongoing 0.70 km
7 WISDOM RESIDENCY Raipur Ongoing 0.79 km
8 SIYA RESIDENCY PHASE -2 Raipur New 0.80 km
9 mittal' 16 Raipur Ongoing 0.83 km
10 sumeet trade center (commercial) sumeet residency(residential) Raipur New 1.06 km
11 WALLFORT ELEGANTE Raipur Ongoing 1.09 km
12 MAY FAIR Raipur Ongoing 1.14 km
13 GULZAR HOMES Raipur Ongoing 1.15 km
14 ASHOKA IKON PHASE -3 Raipur New 1.19 km
15 ASHOKA ROYAL A&B Raipur Ongoing 1.20 km
16 sumeet busIness park Raipur Ongoing 1.23 km
17 SAI SILVER Raipur New 1.26 km
18 VARDHMAN SKYLINE - RAIPUR Raipur Ongoing 1.28 km
19 chandra planet Raipur Ongoing 1.31 km
20 samta parisar Raipur Ongoing 1.36 km
21 AVENUE - 144 Raipur Ongoing 1.48 km
22 M/S SHIVNATH APARTMENTS Raipur New 1.53 km
23 MADHURIMA APARTMENT Raipur New 1.61 km
24 AADINATH VATIKA Raipur New 1.62 km
25 shreeji vaishali Raipur Ongoing 1.70 km
26 shreeji vaishali Raipur Ongoing 1.70 km
27 shreeji vaishali Raipur Ongoing 1.71 km
28 SPARSH SQUARE Raipur Ongoing 1.82 km
29 CHANDRA SPHINX Raipur Ongoing 1.86 km
30 godriwala city phase-02 Raipur New 1.90 km

Buyer Checklist

Documents and verifications a buyer should review before purchase.

Buyer Document Verification Checklist

Key documents a buyer should verify before purchasing in this project. Items marked Available have data on Seemankan.

13/14 verified
  • RERA Registration Certificate Available
    Confirms the project is registered with RERA CG. Verify registration number, validity dates, and project details on the RERA portal.
    RERA No: PCGRERA280618000366
    View on RERA Portal
  • Promoter Registration Certificate Available
    Builder / colonizer company registration certificate. Confirms the promoter entity is a registered firm, company, or society.
    Preview
  • Approved Building / Sanction Plan Available
    Building plan sanctioned by the local authority. Verify floor count, setbacks, and FSI compliance.
    Preview
  • Layout Plan Available
    Approved layout showing plot divisions, roads, open spaces, and common areas.
    Preview
  • Title Deed / Ownership Proof Available
    Proof that the promoter legally owns the land. Verify via Sub-Registrar records.
    Preview
  • Encumbrance Certificate Available
    Confirms the property is free from legal dues, mortgages, or liens. Obtain from Sub-Registrar office.
    Preview
  • Land Use / Diversion Certificate Verify Independently
    Required if land was converted from agricultural to non-agricultural use.
  • Architect Certificate Available
    Certification from a registered architect confirming structural plans and compliance.
    View View View +20 more
  • Structural Engineer Certificate Available
    Certification from a structural engineer confirming building safety and load-bearing capacity.
    View View View +20 more
  • CA Financial Certificate Available
    Chartered Accountant certificate on financial status, project cost estimates, and fund utilization.
    Preview View View +23 more
  • Commencement Certificate Available
    Permission to begin construction issued by the local authority after plan approval.
    Download Download Download +1 more
  • NOCs (No Objection Certificates) Available
    NOCs from fire department, environment, water supply, electricity board, and other authorities.
    View View View +3 more
  • Project Brochure / Specification Available
    Official brochure with unit types, amenities, and specifications. Compare with actual delivery.
    Preview Preview
  • RERA Compliance Orders Available
    Check if any orders, penalties, or directions have been issued against this project by RERA.
    2 order(s) on record — review in Legal tab
Disclaimer: This checklist is for informational purposes only. "Available" means Seemankan has a copy from the RERA portal — it does not constitute legal verification. Always verify original documents with the concerned authorities and consult a legal advisor before making a purchase decision.

Risk Zone Within 5 km

Buffer zones (water bodies, airport restrictions) and risk sites (landfills, waste processing) detected within 3 km (immediate) and 5 km (extended) of the project.

23
Risk zones (within 5 km)
3 km: 10 3–5 km: 12
22
Water bodies (river/nala/lake)
3 km: 10 3–5 km: 12
0
Landfill / waste sites
3 km: 0 3–5 km: 0
1
Airport buffer overlap
3 km: 0 3–5 km: 0
Risk Zone Map (3 km & 5 km rings) Project marker centered
Water Bodies (22)
  • Mandir Hasaud Talab ≤3 km
    Tank · 50m buffer
    0.49 km
  • Khamhardih Nala ≤3 km
    Drain · 20m buffer
    1.21 km
  • Pandri Nala ≤3 km
    Nala · 20m buffer
    1.75 km
  • Pandri Talab ≤3 km
    Tank · 50m buffer
    1.82 km
  • Birgaon Talab ≤3 km
    Tank · 50m buffer
    2.21 km
  • Shankar Nagar Nala ≤3 km
    Nala · 20m buffer
    2.3 km
  • Dunda Talab ≤3 km
    Pond · 50m buffer
    2.41 km
  • Budha Talab (Vivekananda Sarovar) ≤3 km
    Lake · 50m buffer
    2.87 km
Airport (1)
  • Swami Vivekananda Airport 5–10 km
    RPR / VARP · DGCA height limits apply
    9.68 km

Reviews

Verified buyer reviews and ratings for this project.

No reviews yet. Be the first to review this project!

Login to Write a Review

You need to be signed in to submit a review for this project.

Login or Register