Home / RERA Projects / LAS VISTA, PHASE - II
ONGOING Plotted Development RERA Page Project Website

LAS VISTA, PHASE - II

Compliance Status
Partial Compliance
21.2089, 81.5492 Explore area
District
Raipur
Area
Promoter
AMRIT HOMES PVT. LTD
Project Information
Promoter AMRIT HOMES PVT. LTD
Type Plotted Development
Status Ongoing
Completion 31 Dec 2018
Registered 28 Sep 2018
Original End 31 Dec 2018
EWS Category NO
Construction Cost ₹ 7878000
Land Cost ₹ 32995000
Authorised Person PRITPAL SINGH BINDRA
Address VILLAGE - AMLIDIH & PURENA, RAIPUR (C.G.)
At a Glance
-
Total Units
-
Units Sold
-
Unsold
2
Legal Cases
Dec 2018
Target Completion
100%
Completion
Amenities & Facilities (21)
BADMINTON COURT
100%
BARBEQUE AREA
100%
BOUNDARY WALL
100%
CLUB HOUSE
100%
COMMUNITY BUILDINGS
100%
ENERGY MAANAGEMENT
100%
FIRE PROTECTION AND FIRE SAFETY REQUIREMENTS
100%
GYM
100%
INTERNAL ROADS AND FOOTPATHS
100%
LANDSCAPING AND TREE PLANTING
100%
OPEN PARKING
100%
SECURITY SERVICE
100%
SEWERAGE
100%
SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT AND DISPOSAL
100%
STORM WATER DRAINS
100%
STREET LIGHTING
100%
SWIMMING POOL
0%
TENNIS COURT
100%
TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL OF SEWERAGE AND SULLAGE WAT
100%
WATER CONSERVATION RAIN WATER HARVESTING
100%
WATER SUPPLY
100%
Project Professionals
CA. SUMIT DHANKANI
STATUTORY CA
SHUBHAM GUPTA
QUARTERLY CA
HITENDRA KANSOTIYA
ENGINEER
HITENDRA KANSOTIYA
ARCHITECT
Project Analysis

360° Project Intelligence

Comprehensive analysis across regulatory, livability, market, filing activity, and market readiness dimensions.

Area Livability

Livability of Villa California Area

Eighteen environmental, infrastructure and amenity parameters for the nearest mapped area (Villa California Area — 2.18 km from this project). Click any parameter for the underlying readings, thresholds and what they mean.



🏠 Livability Parameters

Latest readings for Villa California Area. Only parameters with available data are shown below. Based on the latest readings for Villa California Area.

B
Composite Score
68.5 /100
Good

🌬️ Air Quality

Final Score: 91.6/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Air Quality?AQI summarizes PM2.5, PM10 and gases. Lower pollution values improve public health outcomes.
AQI
71
Satisfactory
PM2.5
23.8 µg/m³
≤ 40
PM10
161.3 µg/m³
≤ 60
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
PM2.5 23.8 µg/m³ ≤ 40
Good
PM10 161.3 µg/m³ ≤ 60
Concern
NO₂ 21.9 µg/m³ ≤ 40
Good
💡 What does this mean for you?Cleaner air lowers respiratory burden and improves outdoor comfort.

💧 Water Quality

Final Score: 61.6/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Water Quality?Water quality combines chemistry, supply duration and contamination markers.
TDS
317 ppm
≤ 500
pH
7.13
6.5–8.5
Supply
7.5 hr/day
≥ 8 hr
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
TDS 317 ppm ≤ 500
Good
Fluoride 0.60 mg/L ≤ 1.0
Good
Turbidity 4.9 NTU ≤ 1
Concern
💡 What does this mean for you?Better supply quality and consistency reduces dependence on tanker/groundwater fallback.

🧹 Sanitation

Final Score: 69.6/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Sanitation?Sanitation reflects ODF status, sewage treatment and waste management regularity.
ODF
ODF++
ODF++
Sewage Coverage
57%
≥ 80%
Drainage
68%
≥ 90%
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
ODF Status ODF++ ODF++
Info
Sewage Coverage 57% ≥ 80%
Concern
Drainage Coverage 68% ≥ 90%
Concern
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher sanitation maturity lowers disease exposure and neighborhood nuisance.

🛣️ Infrastructure

Final Score: 41.5/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Infrastructure?Infrastructure score combines land use, urbanization, built form, night lights and terrain indicators.
Built-up
31.6%
Balanced band
Tree Cover
14.9%
≥ 15%
Urbanization
24.9
Higher better
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Built-up (LULC) 31.6% 40-70%
Contextual
Impervious Surface 23.2% < 70%
Good
NDVI Mean 0.232 > 0.3
Concern
💡 What does this mean for you?Balanced built + green mix usually improves long-term livability resilience.

🏥 Amenities

Final Score: 58.1/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Amenities?Amenity score captures daily-access services in walk/short-drive radii.
Hospitals 500m
0
Target ≥1
Schools 1km
3
Target ≥3
Parks 500m
1
Target ≥1
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Hospitals (500m) 0 ≥1
Concern
Schools (1km) 3 ≥3
Good
Markets (1km) 8 ≥1
Good
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher local amenity density improves convenience and walkability.

🌳 Green Cover

Final Score: 81.5/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Green Cover?NDVI and vegetation structure are measured from satellite imagery to estimate neighborhood greenery.
NDVI Mean
0.301
Greenness index
Vegetation
54.2%
% green pixels
Dense Green
22.9%
Thick canopy
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
NDVI Mean 0.301 0.5 maps to score 100
Weighted 40%
Vegetation % 54.2% Direct % (cap 100)
Weighted 30%
Dense Green % 22.9% Scaled from 50%
Weighted 20%
Parks within 500m 3 Count * 33 (cap 100)
Weighted 10%
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher green metrics typically reduce heat stress and improve comfort.

🔊 Noise

Final Score: 68.8/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Noise?Noise uses measured day/night dB compared to CPCB zone limits.
Day dB
41.6
vs CPCB day limit
Night dB
45.2
vs CPCB night limit
Zone
residential
CPCB class
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Day Noise 41.6 dB ≤ 55.0 dB
Good
Night Noise 45.2 dB ≤ 45.0 dB
Concern
Nearest Highway 2,269 m Higher usually quieter
Info
💡 What does this mean for you?Chronic high noise impacts stress, sleep quality and perceived comfort.

🌊 Flood Risk

Final Score: 66.4/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Flood Risk?Flood risk combines river exposure and local waterlogging vulnerability.
Overall Risk
Low
Lower is safer
River Risk
Low
Lower is safer
Waterlogging
Low
Lower is safer
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Overall Risk Low Low preferred
Info
River Flood Risk Low Low preferred
Info
Waterlogging Risk Low Low preferred
Info
💡 What does this mean for you?Lower flood risk means less disruption and lower hazard exposure.

🏚️ Earthquake Risk

Final Score: 71.3/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Earthquake Risk?Earthquake profile uses seismic zone, PGA and soil/liquefaction risk factors.
Seismic Zone
II
Lower risk zone preferred
Risk Level
Low
Low preferred
Liquefaction
Low
Low preferred
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Seismic Zone II II preferred
Info
Risk Level Low Low preferred
Info
PGA (475yr) 0.051 Lower preferred
Info
💡 What does this mean for you?Lower seismic hazard reduces structural and insurance risk exposure.

🌡️ Land Surface Temp

Final Score: 63.5/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Land Surface Temp?Land Surface Temperature reflects heat-island intensity from satellite thermal bands.
LST Mean
29.1°C
Lower better
LST Min
11.7°C
Context
LST Max
37.4°C
Lower better
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
LST Mean 29.1°C 20°C best / 45°C worst
Weighted by formula
LST Score 63.4 0-100
Computed
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
LST Mean (°C) 30.8 27.5 29.1
LST Min (°C) 12.0 11.4 11.7
LST Max (°C) 36.7 38.2 37.4
LST Score 57.0 70.0 63.4
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher heat exposure affects comfort, cooling load and health risk.

🏗️ Built-up Density

Final Score: 59.6/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Built-up Density?Built-up density measures extent of developed surface versus open space.
Built-up %
40.5%
Lower better
Open Space %
59.6%
Higher better
Built-up Score
59.6
0-100
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Built-up % 40.5% Inverse scoring
Score = 100 - builtup%
Open Space % 59.6% Context
Info
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Built-up % 39.6% 41.3% 40.5%
Open Space % 60.4% 58.7% 59.6%
Built-up Score 60.4 58.7 59.6
💡 What does this mean for you?Very high built-up often raises heat and runoff while reducing open environmental buffers.

💡 Night-time Lights

Final Score: 18.0/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Night-time Lights?Nighttime lights are a proxy for economic activity and electrification intensity.
Avg Radiance
9.01
Higher better
Max Radiance
23.34
Context
NTL Score
18.0
0-100
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Avg Radiance 9.01 Scaled to 50
Score = min(100, avg/50*100)
NTL Score 18.0 0-100
Computed
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Avg Radiance 6.63 11.40 9.01
Max Radiance 28.98 17.70 23.34
NTL Score 13.3 22.8 18.0
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher radiance often indicates stronger urban activity but can correlate with light pollution.

🏞️ Water Bodies

Final Score: 33.1/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Water Bodies?Water-bodies score reflects permanent and seasonal water presence in the analysis radius.
Permanent Water
9.45%
Higher generally better
Seasonal Water
69.00%
Context
Water Score
96.2
0-100
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Permanent Water % 9.45% 70% weight
Scaled against 10%
Seasonal Water % 69.00% 30% weight
Scaled against 20%
Water Score 96.2 0-100
Computed
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Permanent Water % 9.05% 9.85% 9.45%
Seasonal Water % 60.95% 77.04% 69.00%
Water Score 31.7 34.5 96.2
💡 What does this mean for you?Water presence can support cooling, recharge and ecological quality.

👥 Population Density

Final Score: 88.6/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Population Density?Population density indicates urban crowding pressure around the area.
Population
38,032
Estimated residents
Density/km²
2,280.0
Lower better for this score
Score
88.6
0-100
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Density/km² 2,280.0 Inverse scale up to 20,000
Lower -> higher score
Score 88.6 0-100
Computed
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Population Total 6,608 69,456 38,032
Density / km² 2,103.5 2,456.5 2,280.0
Pop Density Score 89.5 87.7 88.6
💡 What does this mean for you?Extremely high density can increase pressure on services and mobility.

Groundwater

Final Score: 63.2/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Groundwater?Groundwater score combines moisture, recharge, drought and trend indicators.
Soil Moisture
143.588
Higher better
Recharge
0.77
Higher better
PDSI
3.29
Higher better
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Soil Moisture 143.588 30% weight
Scaled
Recharge 0.77 25% weight
Scaled
PDSI 3.29 20% weight
Scaled
SM Trend -17.5858 15% weight
Scaled
Precipitation 1,806.19 10% weight
Scaled
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Soil Moisture 138.200 148.977 143.588
Recharge Estimate 0.74 0.80 0.77
PDSI 3.42 3.16 3.29
Groundwater Score 57.3 69.1 63.0
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher score suggests better long-term aquifer and moisture support conditions.

🌧️ Waterlogging

↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Waterlogging?Waterlogging combines topography, imperviousness and wetness indices across nearby grid cells.
Grid Count
11
Sampled cells
Avg Susceptibility
49.5
Lower is safer
High Risk Grids
4
High / Very High
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTargetStatus
Avg Susceptibility 49.5 < 40
Concern
Avg Slope 2.52° > 1°
Good
Avg Impervious 17.4% < 70%
Good
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher susceptibility and low slope increase monsoon water stagnation probability.

🚶 Walkability & Safety

↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Walkability & Safety?OSM amenity metrics reflect pedestrian, safety and urban accessibility infrastructure.
Footpaths
0
Higher better
Street Lamps
2
Higher better
Police/Fire Access
0
Presence
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Footpaths (500m) 0 ≥ 3
Concern
Sidewalk Roads (1km) 0 ≥ 5
Concern
Nearest Police Station 1,061 m ≤ 2000m
Context
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher OSM accessibility/safety features generally improve everyday livability.

⚠️ Risk Factors

↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Risk Factors?Nearby hazards and sensitive risk points mapped around this area.
Total Risks
4
Mapped points
Scoring Breakdown
CategoryRiskDistance / SeverityMeaning
Air_pollution NH traffic corridor 479 m / Medium National highway truck traffic emissions
Environmental Roadside waste dump 1247 m / Medium Informal waste dumping near road area
Water_drainage Open drainage channel 1143 m / Low Uncovered drainage near residential area
Infrastructure Unpaved access road 1178 m / Low Unmaintained kachha road section
💡 What does this mean for you?Closer and severe risks can affect insurance, resale and safety comfort.

🌬️ Air Quality: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

💧 Water Quality: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🧹 Sanitation: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🛣️ Infrastructure: Infrastructure Score Formula

Formula: Composite weighted model from GHSL/ESA/VIIRS/Terrain features
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Urbanization index24.9020%SMOD
Built-up balance31.6%15%Best in moderate band
NTL stability50.8%15%Power/activity consistency
Avg building height6.12 m10%Vertical infra proxy
Impervious %23.2%10%Moderate is optimal
Radiance10.7410%Development proxy
Slope0.15°10%Flatter is better
Green support14.9%10%Tree + grass contribution
This is the same weighted structure used in Livability Infrastructure model.
Final: 41.48 / 100

🏥 Amenities: Amenity Score Breakdown

Formula: Each amenity category is capped at 100, final score is averaged across categories
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Hospitals 500m0 * 33Cap 100Health access
Schools 1km3 * 20Cap 100Education access
Markets 1km8 * 33Cap 100Daily needs
Parks 500m1 * 33Cap 100Open space
Transit 1km0 * 50Cap 100Mobility
Category multipliers mirror the Livability snapshot logic.
Final: Final from amenity_scores table

🌳 Green Cover: Green Score Formula

Formula: Score = (NDVI*40%) + (Vegetation*30%) + (Dense Green*20%) + (Parks*10%)
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
NDVI component0.301 => 60.240%24.1
Vegetation component54.2% => 54.230%16.3
Dense green component22.9% => 45.720%9.1
Parks component3 => 99.010%9.9
This matches the Livability GreenCover model weighting logic.
Final: 59.38 / 100

🔊 Noise: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🌊 Flood Risk: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🏚️ Earthquake Risk: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🌡️ Land Surface Temp: LST Score Formula

Formula: Score = ((45 - LST Mean) / 25) * 100, clipped to [0,100]
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
LST Mean29.14 °CReference20°C best, 45°C worst
Lower land surface temperature means better livability.
Final: 63.44 / 100

🏗️ Built-up Density: Built-up Score Formula

Formula: Score = 100 - Built-up %
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Built-up %40.5%InverseLower is better
Dense concrete surfaces reduce infiltration and increase heat islands.
Final: 59.55 / 100

💡 Night-time Lights: Night-time Lights Formula

Formula: Score = min(100, (Avg Radiance / 50) * 100)
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Avg Radiance9.01Scale 0-50Higher indicates activity
Higher night radiance generally tracks electrification and economic intensity.
Final: 18.03 / 100

🏞️ Water Bodies: Water Bodies Score Formula

Formula: Score = (Permanent Water Score * 70%) + (Seasonal Water Score * 30%)
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Permanent water9.45%70%Scaled against 10% benchmark
Seasonal water69.00%30%Scaled against 20% benchmark
Permanent water has higher score weight than seasonal water.
Final: 96.15 / 100

👥 Population Density: Population Density Formula

Formula: Score = ((20000 - density_per_km²) / 20000) * 100, clipped to [0,100]
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Density2,280.0 /km²Inverse scaleLower density -> higher score
This follows the Livability PopulationDensity model.
Final: 88.60 / 100

⛲ Groundwater: Groundwater Score Formula

Formula: Weighted: Soil Moisture 30% + Recharge 25% + PDSI 20% + Trend 15% + Precipitation 10%
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Soil moisture143.58830%Scaled to 0-200
Recharge estimate0.7725%Scaled -200 to +400
PDSI3.2920%Scaled -4 to +4
SM trend-17.585815%Scaled -50 to +50
Precipitation1,806.1910%Scaled 800 to 1800
Exactly reused from Livability Groundwater model logic.
Final: 62.99 / 100

🌧️ Waterlogging: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🚶 Walkability & Safety: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

⚠️ Risk Factors: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

View full livability report for Villa California Area →

Compliance Status

RERA registration, filings, and compliance flags based on public CG-RERA records.

Compliance Status Based on public CG-RERA records
3 Passed
1 Issue(s)
2 N/A
RERA Registration Active
Reg No. PCGRERA280918000787 — Status: Ongoing
No Penalty Orders
2 order(s) on record, none with penalty sections (Sec 38/39/40/59/61/63)
Sec 38–63 · Source
No Recent Orders
No orders filed in the last 12 months (older: 2)
Completion Overdue
Was due 31 Dec 2018 — overdue by ~89 month(s)
Section 4 · Source
Quarterly Updates Not Available
No compliance snapshot data on record
Section 11 · Source
Annual Audit Not Available
No compliance snapshot data on record
Section 4(2)(l)(D) · Source
Each check is based on publicly available CG-RERA portal data as of Apr 2026. How this works →
Other Projects by Same Promoter (2)
ProjectRERA No.StatusDistrictType
FLORAL CITY PCGRERA130326002057 Ongoing Raipur Residential Development
LAS VISTA, PHASE - I PCGRERA270918000785 Ongoing Raipur Plotted Development

Details

Registration, professional team, bank, promoters, and compliance history.

Registration Details
RERA Number
PCGRERA280918000787
Status
Ongoing
Project Type
Plotted Development
Approved Date
28 Sep 2018
Original End Date
31 Dec 2018
EWS Category
NO
Construction Cost
₹ 7878000
Land Cost
₹ 32995000
Proposed Completion
31 Dec 2018
Authorised Person
PRITPAL SINGH BINDRA
Website
www.amrithomes.com
Professional Team
RoleNameLicense / Membership
Statutory CA CA. SUMIT DHANKANI 437699
Quarterly CA Shubham Gupta 427298
Engineer HITENDRA KANSOTIYA COA/02/29900, MLCA-0
Architect HITENDRA KANSOTIYA COA/02/29900, MLCA-054 TCP/037

Location

Project address, coordinates, and nearby places.

Location Details
Address
VILLAGE - AMLIDIH & PURENA, RAIPUR (C.G.)
District
Raipur
Tehsil
Raipur
Coordinates
21.2089100, 81.5492400 View on Map
Neighborhood Intelligence

Explore nearby infrastructure around this project. Toggle categories to show/hide on the map.

Neighborhood Map 3 km radius
RERA Projects Near LAS VISTA, PHASE - II 20 found within 3 km
# Project District Status Distance
1 SHRI SAI CITY (PHASE-1) Durg Ongoing 1.17 km
2 SHRI SAI CITY ( PHASE -2) Durg Ongoing 1.19 km
3 SHRI SAI CITY (PHASE-3) Durg Ongoing 1.32 km
4 VILLA CALIFORNIA Durg Ongoing 1.57 km
5 AKS SMART CITY Durg Ongoing 1.73 km
6 EMERALD HOMES (AKS WORLD CITY) Durg Ongoing 1.86 km
7 ZENITH RESIDENCY Durg Ongoing 2.02 km
8 GREENEARTH CITY AVENUE Durg New 2.08 km
9 maruti infra city phase- ii Durg Ongoing 2.14 km
10 GREENEARTH CITY PHASE 4 Durg Ongoing 2.23 km
11 GREENEARTH CITY PHASE 3 Durg Ongoing 2.23 km
12 MARUTI INFRAA CITY PHASE - 2 Durg New 2.27 km
13 atal vihar yojna parsada kumhari Durg Ongoing 2.28 km
14 HARSHIT NEO CITY Durg Ongoing 2.38 km
15 multi sports city Durg New 2.43 km
16 GREENEARTH CITY PHASE- 2 Durg Ongoing 2.46 km
17 AASHA PRIDE CITY Durg New 2.78 km
18 WALLFORT VIHAR Durg Ongoing 2.80 km
19 maruti 7 wonder city Durg New 2.93 km
20 MARUTI INFRAA CITY 3 Durg New 2.96 km

Buyer Checklist

Documents and verifications a buyer should review before purchase.

Buyer Document Verification Checklist

Key documents a buyer should verify before purchasing in this project. Items marked Available have data on Seemankan.

12/14 verified
  • RERA Registration Certificate Available
    Confirms the project is registered with RERA CG. Verify registration number, validity dates, and project details on the RERA portal.
    RERA No: PCGRERA280918000787
  • Promoter Registration Certificate Available
    Builder / colonizer company registration certificate. Confirms the promoter entity is a registered firm, company, or society.
  • Approved Building / Sanction Plan Verify Independently
    Building plan sanctioned by the local authority. Verify floor count, setbacks, and FSI compliance.
  • Layout Plan Available
    Approved layout showing plot divisions, roads, open spaces, and common areas.
  • Title Deed / Ownership Proof Available
    Proof that the promoter legally owns the land. Verify via Sub-Registrar records.
  • Encumbrance Certificate Available
    Confirms the property is free from legal dues, mortgages, or liens. Obtain from Sub-Registrar office.
  • Land Use / Diversion Certificate Available
    Required if land was converted from agricultural to non-agricultural use.
  • Architect Certificate Available
    Certification from a registered architect confirming structural plans and compliance.
  • Structural Engineer Certificate Available
    Certification from a structural engineer confirming building safety and load-bearing capacity.
  • CA Financial Certificate Available
    Chartered Accountant certificate on financial status, project cost estimates, and fund utilization.
  • Commencement Certificate Verify Independently
    Permission to begin construction issued by the local authority after plan approval.
  • NOCs (No Objection Certificates) Available
    NOCs from fire department, environment, water supply, electricity board, and other authorities.
  • Project Brochure / Specification Available
    Official brochure with unit types, amenities, and specifications. Compare with actual delivery.
  • RERA Compliance Orders Available
    Check if any orders, penalties, or directions have been issued against this project by RERA.
    2 order(s) on record — review in Legal tab

Risk Zone Within 5 km

Buffer zones (water bodies, airport restrictions) and risk sites (landfills, waste processing) detected within 3 km (immediate) and 5 km (extended) of the project.

4
Risk zones (within 5 km)
3 km: 0 3–5 km: 4
1
Water bodies (river/nala/lake)
3 km: 0 3–5 km: 1
3
Landfill / waste sites
3 km: 0 3–5 km: 3
0
Airport buffer overlap
3 km: 0 3–5 km: 0
Risk Zone Map (3 km & 5 km rings) Project marker centered
Water Bodies (1)
  • Urla Talab 3–5 km
    Tank · 50m buffer
    3.63 km
Landfill / Waste Sites (3)
  • Bhanpuri-Rawabhata Legacy Dump 3–5 km
    Legacy dump · 500m buffer
    3.11 km
  • Sarora Trenching Ground 3–5 km
    Active landfill · 500m buffer
    4.13 km
  • Sarora Composting / Bio-methanation Plant 3–5 km
    Waste processing · 200m buffer
    4.57 km

Reviews

Verified buyer reviews and ratings for this project.

No reviews yet. Be the first to review this project!

Login to Write a Review

You need to be signed in to submit a review for this project.

Login or Register