Home / RERA Projects / GOLDEN SANDS
ONGOING Residential Development RERA Page Project Website
GENERATE REPORT

GOLDEN SANDS

Compliance Status
Compliant
21.2419, 81.6610 Explore area
District
Raipur
Area
—
Promoter
NEXUS DEVCON PRIVATE LIMITED, THRU-TARUN MARWAH
Project Information
Promoter NEXUS DEVCON PRIVATE LIMITED, THRU-TARUN MARWAH
Type Residential Development
Status Ongoing
Completion 28 Aug 2026
RERA No. PCGRERA291218000884
Registered 29 Dec 2018
Original End 31 Dec 2021
Total Units 49 · 18 sold
EWS Category NO
Construction Cost ₹ 116000000
Land Cost ₹ 9440000
Authorised Person TARUN MARWAH
Address VILLAGE - SHANKAR NAGAR, RAIPUR (C.G.)
At a Glance
49
Total Units
18
Units Sold
26
Unsold
11
Legal Cases
Aug 2026
Target Completion
91%
Completion
Amenities & Facilities (11)
BOUNDARY WALL
100%
ENERGY MAANAGEMENT
100%
INTERNAL ROADS AND FOOTPATHS
98%
LANDSCAPING AND TREE PLANTING
100%
OPEN PARKING
100%
parking
100%
SECURITY SERVICE
100%
SEWERAGE
100%
STORM WATER DRAINS
100%
STREET LIGHTING
98%
WATER SUPPLY
100%
Project Professionals
MANISH SETPAL
STATUTORY CA
VINOD MAKHIJA
QUARTERLY CA
RAJENDRA JAIN
ENGINEER
SHASHIKANT KUJUR
ARCHITECT
Project Analysis

360° Project Intelligence

Comprehensive analysis across regulatory, livability, market, filing activity, and market readiness dimensions.

Regulatory
64
9 of 14 checks · Moderate Signals
Livability
55
Panchsheel Nagar · Moderate Signals
Legal
11
11 legal order(s) · 30 nearby
Filing Activity
423
336 docs · 87 quarterly updates
Market Readiness
37
Ongoing · due Aug 2026
Area Livability

Livability of Panchsheel Nagar

Eighteen environmental, infrastructure and amenity parameters for the nearest mapped area (Panchsheel Nagar — 0.54 km from this project). Click any parameter for the underlying readings, thresholds and what they mean.



🏠 Livability Parameters

Latest readings for Panchsheel Nagar. Only parameters with available data are shown below. Based on the latest readings for Panchsheel Nagar.

C
Composite Score
54.7 /100
Average

🌬️ Air Quality

Final Score: 87.6/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Air Quality?AQI summarizes PM2.5, PM10 and gases. Lower pollution values improve public health outcomes.
AQI
81
Satisfactory
PM2.5
27.9 µg/m³
≤ 40
PM10
238.9 µg/m³
≤ 60
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
PM2.5 27.9 µg/m³ ≤ 40
Good
PM10 238.9 µg/m³ ≤ 60
Concern
NO₂ 22.7 µg/m³ ≤ 40
Good
💡 What does this mean for you?Cleaner air lowers respiratory burden and improves outdoor comfort.

💧 Water Quality

Final Score: 67.8/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Water Quality?Water quality combines chemistry, supply duration and contamination markers.
TDS
320 ppm
≤ 500
pH
7.33
6.5–8.5
Supply
4.1 hr/day
≥ 8 hr
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
TDS 320 ppm ≤ 500
Good
Fluoride 0.62 mg/L ≤ 1.0
Good
Turbidity 3.6 NTU ≤ 1
Concern
💡 What does this mean for you?Better supply quality and consistency reduces dependence on tanker/groundwater fallback.

🧹 Sanitation

Final Score: 80.6/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Sanitation?Sanitation reflects ODF status, sewage treatment and waste management regularity.
ODF
ODF++
ODF++
Sewage Coverage
72%
≥ 80%
Drainage
76%
≥ 90%
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
ODF Status ODF++ ODF++
Info
Sewage Coverage 72% ≥ 80%
Concern
Drainage Coverage 76% ≥ 90%
Concern
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher sanitation maturity lowers disease exposure and neighborhood nuisance.

🛣️ Infrastructure

Final Score: 81.0/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Infrastructure?Infrastructure score combines land use, urbanization, built form, night lights and terrain indicators.
Built-up
79.2%
Balanced band
Tree Cover
12.1%
≥ 15%
Urbanization
100.0
Higher better
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Built-up (LULC) 79.2% 40-70%
Contextual
Impervious Surface 34.5% < 70%
Good
NDVI Mean 0.240 > 0.3
Concern
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Built-up (LULC) % 80.1% 78.3% 79.2%
Tree Cover % 14.0% 10.1% 12.1%
Urbanization Index 100.0 100.0 100.0
Infra Score 80.4 81.6 81.1
💡 What does this mean for you?Balanced built + green mix usually improves long-term livability resilience.

🏥 Amenities

Final Score: 69.1/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Amenities?Amenity score captures daily-access services in walk/short-drive radii.
Hospitals 500m
0
Target ≥1
Schools 1km
3
Target ≥3
Parks 500m
6
Target ≥1
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Hospitals (500m) 0 ≥1
Concern
Schools (1km) 3 ≥3
Good
Markets (1km) 0 ≥1
Concern
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher local amenity density improves convenience and walkability.

🌳 Green Cover

Final Score: 31.8/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Green Cover?NDVI and vegetation structure are measured from satellite imagery to estimate neighborhood greenery.
NDVI Mean
0.156
Greenness index
Vegetation
15.1%
% green pixels
Dense Green
5.8%
Thick canopy
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
NDVI Mean 0.156 0.5 maps to score 100
Weighted 40%
Vegetation % 15.1% Direct % (cap 100)
Weighted 30%
Dense Green % 5.8% Scaled from 50%
Weighted 20%
Parks within 500m 6 Count * 33 (cap 100)
Weighted 10%
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
NDVI Mean 0.121 0.191 0.156
Vegetation % 15.9% 14.3% 15.1%
Dense Green % 6.0% 5.5% 5.8%
Tree Canopy % 8.8% 11.1% 10.0%
Green Score 26.9 31.8 29.3
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher green metrics typically reduce heat stress and improve comfort.

🔊 Noise

Final Score: 46.0/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Noise?Noise uses measured day/night dB compared to CPCB zone limits.
Day dB
57.5
vs CPCB day limit
Night dB
51.5
vs CPCB night limit
Zone
CPCB class
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Day Noise 57.5 dB ≤ 65.0 dB
Good
Night Noise 51.5 dB ≤ 55.0 dB
Good
Nearest Highway 524 m Higher usually quieter
Info
💡 What does this mean for you?Chronic high noise impacts stress, sleep quality and perceived comfort.

🌊 Flood Risk

Final Score: 10.0/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Flood Risk?Flood risk combines river exposure and local waterlogging vulnerability.
Overall Risk
Low
Lower is safer
River Risk
Low
Lower is safer
Waterlogging
Low
Lower is safer
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Overall Risk Low Low preferred
Info
River Flood Risk Low Low preferred
Info
Waterlogging Risk Low Low preferred
Info
💡 What does this mean for you?Lower flood risk means less disruption and lower hazard exposure.

🏚️ Earthquake Risk

Final Score: 10.0/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Earthquake Risk?Earthquake profile uses seismic zone, PGA and soil/liquefaction risk factors.
Seismic Zone
Zone II
Lower risk zone preferred
Risk Level
Low
Low preferred
Liquefaction
None
Low preferred
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Seismic Zone Zone II II preferred
Info
Risk Level Low Low preferred
Info
PGA (475yr) 0.0155g Lower preferred
Info
💡 What does this mean for you?Lower seismic hazard reduces structural and insurance risk exposure.

🌡️ Land Surface Temp

Final Score: 59.3/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Land Surface Temp?Land Surface Temperature reflects heat-island intensity from satellite thermal bands.
LST Mean
30.2°C
Lower better
LST Min
14.9°C
Context
LST Max
40.3°C
Lower better
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
LST Mean 30.2°C 20°C best / 45°C worst
Weighted by formula
LST Score 59.3 0-100
Computed
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
LST Mean (°C) 30.0 30.4 30.2
LST Min (°C) 15.6 14.2 14.9
LST Max (°C) 40.1 40.5 40.3
LST Score 60.1 58.6 59.3
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher heat exposure affects comfort, cooling load and health risk.

🏗️ Built-up Density

Final Score: 20.8/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Built-up Density?Built-up density measures extent of developed surface versus open space.
Built-up %
79.2%
Lower better
Open Space %
20.8%
Higher better
Built-up Score
20.8
0-100
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Built-up % 79.2% Inverse scoring
Score = 100 - builtup%
Open Space % 20.8% Context
Info
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Built-up % 80.1% 78.3% 79.2%
Open Space % 19.9% 21.7% 20.8%
Built-up Score 19.9 21.7 20.8
💡 What does this mean for you?Very high built-up often raises heat and runoff while reducing open environmental buffers.

💡 Night-time Lights

Final Score: 67.2/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Night-time Lights?Nighttime lights are a proxy for economic activity and electrification intensity.
Avg Radiance
33.59
Higher better
Max Radiance
52.12
Context
NTL Score
67.2
0-100
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Avg Radiance 33.59 Scaled to 50
Score = min(100, avg/50*100)
NTL Score 67.2 0-100
Computed
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Avg Radiance 35.10 32.07 33.59
Max Radiance 53.73 50.50 52.12
NTL Score 70.2 64.2 67.2
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher radiance often indicates stronger urban activity but can correlate with light pollution.

🏞️ Water Bodies

Final Score: 100.0/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Water Bodies?Water-bodies score reflects permanent and seasonal water presence in the analysis radius.
Permanent Water
79.27%
Higher generally better
Seasonal Water
98.94%
Context
Water Score
100.0
0-100
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Permanent Water % 79.27% 70% weight
Scaled against 10%
Seasonal Water % 98.94% 30% weight
Scaled against 20%
Water Score 100.0 0-100
Computed
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Permanent Water % 78.93% 79.61% 79.27%
Seasonal Water % 99.55% 98.32% 98.94%
Water Score 100.0 100.0 100.0
💡 What does this mean for you?Water presence can support cooling, recharge and ecological quality.

👥 Population Density

Final Score: 58.9/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Population Density?Population density indicates urban crowding pressure around the area.
Population
120,645
Estimated residents
Density/km²
8,229.5
Lower better for this score
Score
58.9
0-100
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Density/km² 8,229.5 Inverse scale up to 20,000
Lower -> higher score
Score 58.9 0-100
Computed
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Population Total 28,010 213,280 120,645
Density / km² 8,915.7 7,543.2 8,229.5
Pop Density Score 55.4 62.3 58.9
💡 What does this mean for you?Extremely high density can increase pressure on services and mobility.

⛲ Groundwater

Final Score: 63.5/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Groundwater?Groundwater score combines moisture, recharge, drought and trend indicators.
Soil Moisture
134.427
Higher better
Recharge
0.41
Higher better
PDSI
2.99
Higher better
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Soil Moisture 134.427 30% weight
Scaled
Recharge 0.41 25% weight
Scaled
PDSI 2.99 20% weight
Scaled
SM Trend 0.0000 15% weight
Scaled
Precipitation 1,872.90 10% weight
Scaled
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Soil Moisture 134.369 134.484 134.427
Recharge Estimate 0.00 0.82 0.41
PDSI 2.97 3.01 2.99
Groundwater Score 63.4 63.6 63.5
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher score suggests better long-term aquifer and moisture support conditions.

🌧️ Waterlogging

↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Waterlogging?Waterlogging combines topography, imperviousness and wetness indices across nearby grid cells.
Grid Count
3
Sampled cells
Avg Susceptibility
50.3
Lower is safer
High Risk Grids
2
High / Very High
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTargetStatus
Avg Susceptibility 50.3 < 40
Concern
Avg Slope 2.93° > 1°
Good
Avg Impervious 69.3% < 70%
Good
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher susceptibility and low slope increase monsoon water stagnation probability.

🚶 Walkability & Safety

↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Walkability & Safety?OSM amenity metrics reflect pedestrian, safety and urban accessibility infrastructure.
Footpaths
4
Higher better
Street Lamps
0
Higher better
Police/Fire Access
0
Presence
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Footpaths (500m) 4 ≥ 3
Good
Sidewalk Roads (1km) 0 ≥ 5
Concern
Nearest Police Station — m ≤ 2000m
Context
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher OSM accessibility/safety features generally improve everyday livability.

🌬️ Air Quality: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

💧 Water Quality: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🧹 Sanitation: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🛣️ Infrastructure: Infrastructure Score Formula

Formula: Composite weighted model from GHSL/ESA/VIIRS/Terrain features
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Urbanization index100.0020%SMOD
Built-up balance79.2%15%Best in moderate band
NTL stability71.0%15%Power/activity consistency
Avg building height9.58 m10%Vertical infra proxy
Impervious %34.5%10%Moderate is optimal
Radiance34.0210%Development proxy
Slope0.10°10%Flatter is better
Green support12.1%10%Tree + grass contribution
This is the same weighted structure used in Livability Infrastructure model.
Final: 81.05 / 100

🏥 Amenities: Amenity Score Breakdown

Formula: Each amenity category is capped at 100, final score is averaged across categories
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Hospitals 500m0 * 33Cap 100Health access
Schools 1km3 * 20Cap 100Education access
Markets 1km0 * 33Cap 100Daily needs
Parks 500m6 * 33Cap 100Open space
Transit 1km0 * 50Cap 100Mobility
Category multipliers mirror the Livability snapshot logic.
Final: Final from amenity_scores table

🌳 Green Cover: Green Score Formula

Formula: Score = (NDVI*40%) + (Vegetation*30%) + (Dense Green*20%) + (Parks*10%)
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
NDVI component0.156 => 31.240%12.5
Vegetation component15.1% => 15.130%4.5
Dense green component5.8% => 11.620%2.3
Parks component6 => 100.010%10.0
This matches the Livability GreenCover model weighting logic.
Final: 29.31 / 100

🔊 Noise: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🌊 Flood Risk: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🏚️ Earthquake Risk: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🌡️ Land Surface Temp: LST Score Formula

Formula: Score = ((45 - LST Mean) / 25) * 100, clipped to [0,100]
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
LST Mean30.17 °CReference20°C best, 45°C worst
Lower land surface temperature means better livability.
Final: 59.32 / 100

🏗️ Built-up Density: Built-up Score Formula

Formula: Score = 100 - Built-up %
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Built-up %79.2%InverseLower is better
Dense concrete surfaces reduce infiltration and increase heat islands.
Final: 20.80 / 100

💡 Night-time Lights: Night-time Lights Formula

Formula: Score = min(100, (Avg Radiance / 50) * 100)
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Avg Radiance33.59Scale 0-50Higher indicates activity
Higher night radiance generally tracks electrification and economic intensity.
Final: 67.17 / 100

🏞️ Water Bodies: Water Bodies Score Formula

Formula: Score = (Permanent Water Score * 70%) + (Seasonal Water Score * 30%)
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Permanent water79.27%70%Scaled against 10% benchmark
Seasonal water98.94%30%Scaled against 20% benchmark
Permanent water has higher score weight than seasonal water.
Final: 100.00 / 100

👥 Population Density: Population Density Formula

Formula: Score = ((20000 - density_per_km²) / 20000) * 100, clipped to [0,100]
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Density8,229.5 /km²Inverse scaleLower density -> higher score
This follows the Livability PopulationDensity model.
Final: 58.85 / 100

⛲ Groundwater: Groundwater Score Formula

Formula: Weighted: Soil Moisture 30% + Recharge 25% + PDSI 20% + Trend 15% + Precipitation 10%
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Soil moisture134.42730%Scaled to 0-200
Recharge estimate0.4125%Scaled -200 to +400
PDSI2.9920%Scaled -4 to +4
SM trend0.000015%Scaled -50 to +50
Precipitation1,872.9010%Scaled 800 to 1800
Exactly reused from Livability Groundwater model logic.
Final: 63.49 / 100

🌧️ Waterlogging: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🚶 Walkability & Safety: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

View full livability report for Panchsheel Nagar →

Compliance Status

RERA registration, filings, and compliance flags based on public CG-RERA records.

Compliance Status Based on public CG-RERA records
3 Passed
1 Warning
2 N/A
RERA Registration Active
Reg No. PCGRERA291218000884 — Status: Ongoing
Section 3 · Source · View Certificate · RERA Official Page
No Penalty Orders
11 order(s) on record, none with penalty sections (Sec 38/39/40/59/61/63)
Sec 38–63 · Source
2 Order(s) in Last 12 Months
Recent: M-ALL-2025-02977, M-PRO-2025-02794
Source · M-ALL-2025-02977 · M-PRO-2025-02794
Within Timeline
Target completion: 28 Aug 2026
Section 4 · Source
Quarterly Updates Not Available
No compliance snapshot data on record
Section 11 · Source
Annual Audit Not Available
No compliance snapshot data on record
Section 4(2)(l)(D) · Source
Each check is based on publicly available CG-RERA portal data as of Apr 2026. How this works →

Details

Registration, professional team, bank, promoters, and compliance history.

Registration Details
RERA Number
PCGRERA291218000884
Status
Ongoing
Project Type
Residential Development
Approved Date
29 Dec 2018
Original End Date
31 Dec 2021
EWS Category
NO
Construction Cost
₹ 116000000
Land Cost
₹ 9440000
Proposed Completion
28 Aug 2026
Authorised Person
TARUN MARWAH
View on Map
Professional Team
RoleNameLicense / Membership
Statutory CA MANISH SETPAL 417767
Quarterly CA VINOD MAKHIJA 417929
Engineer RAJENDRA JAIN 330/98
Architect SHASHIKANT KUJUR CA/2018/95221
Promoters
N
NEXUS DEVCON PRIVATE LIMITED, THRU-TARUN MARWAH
M
MR. RAJESH KUMAR PANDEY
R
RAJESH PANDEY
R
RAJEEV SONI
M
MR.UMESHKUMAR PANDEY
T
TARUN MARWAH
M
MR.VINAY MISHRA
N
NEXUS DEVCON PRIVATE LIMITED Company
N
NEXUS DEVCON PRIVATE LIMITED
N
NEXUS DEVCON PVT. LTD, DIRECTOR-SHRI TARUN MARWAHA
N
NEXUS DEVCON PVT. LTD., DIRECTOR- SHRI TARUN MARWAH

Legal Orders & Cases

RERA legal orders, complaints, and case statistics filed against this project.

11
Total Cases
2
Last 12 Months
9
Older Cases
11
PDFs Available
Legal Orders (11)
ComplaintApplicantSectionDateSourcePDF
M-ALL-2025-02977 STATE BANK OF INDIA RACPC RAIPUR - 11 Aug 2025 This project
M-PRO-2025-02794 ASHOK KUMAR AHUJA - 07 Jul 2025 This project
M-REA-2025-02635 NEXUS DEVCON PVT. LTD - 23 Apr 2025 This project
M-REA-2025-02636 NEXUS DEVCON PVT. LTD - 19 Mar 2025 This project
M-REA-2025-02637 NEXUS DEVCON PVT. LTD - 19 Mar 2025 This project
M-PRO-2025-02638 NEXUS DEVCON PVT. LTD - 19 Mar 2025 This project
SM-EXP-2024-02216 CG-RERA - 06 Mar 2024 This project
M-COM-2019-00670 CG-RERA Section 11,Section 60 27 Aug 2021 This project
M-PRO-2020-01058 SHRI KAMAL SETHI, S/O LATE SHRI KISHAN LAL SETHI Section 19 08 Feb 2021 This project
M-PRO-2020-01057 SHRI SANJEEV KUMAR, S/O LATE SHRI KISHAN LAL Section 11 18 Jan 2021 This project
M-PRO-2019-00883 SHRI DHANESH KUMAR YADU, S/O SHRI JAGESHWAR YAHU Section 11 29 Feb 2020 This project

Location

Project address, coordinates, and nearby places.

Location Details
Address
VILLAGE - SHANKAR NAGAR, RAIPUR (C.G.)
District
Raipur
Tehsil
Raipur
Coordinates
21.2419027, 81.6609521 View on Map
Neighborhood Intelligence

Explore nearby infrastructure around this project. Toggle categories to show/hide on the map.

Neighborhood Map 3 km radius
RERA Projects Near GOLDEN SANDS 30 found within 3 km
# Project District Status Distance
1 SLT WATER FRONT Raipur Ongoing 0.09 km
2 ASHOKA IMPRESSION PHASE - 2 Raipur Ongoing 0.26 km
3 oxygen Raipur New 0.93 km
4 chandra icon Raipur New 1.14 km
5 ATLANTIS Raipur Ongoing 1.18 km
6 OFFICE CUM RESIDENTIAL COMPLEX Raipur New 1.30 km
7 SAI SHARDHA Raipur Ongoing 1.34 km
8 SAFFRON CORPORATE Raipur New 1.40 km
9 SAFFRON COMFORTS Raipur New 1.41 km
10 wallfort omega Raipur New 1.44 km
11 CHANDRA SPHINX Raipur Ongoing 1.47 km
12 SPARSH SQUARE Raipur Ongoing 1.49 km
13 shiva prime Raipur Ongoing 1.52 km
14 SAI SIMRAN PURENA Raipur Ongoing 1.53 km
15 V3 ASHIYANA Raipur New 1.62 km
16 aishwarya residency PHASE - I Raipur Ongoing 1.67 km
17 KAVISH ENCLAVE Raipur New 1.67 km
18 Bhardwaj sky phase ii Raipur New 1.70 km
19 bhardwaj sky Raipur New 1.74 km
20 "SHRIJAN" PREMIUM Raipur Ongoing 1.75 km
21 BANYAN TREE ENCLAVE Raipur Ongoing 1.76 km
22 SAMRIDDHI ATLANTIS PHASE-2 Raipur New 1.84 km
23 Samriddhi atlantis Raipur New 1.88 km
24 CURRENCY TOWER Raipur Ongoing 1.89 km
25 JEEVAN PARISAR Raipur Ongoing 1.89 km
26 C.G. ELITE Raipur Ongoing 1.92 km
27 chandra planet Raipur Ongoing 1.94 km
28 ASHOKA IKON PHASE - 2 Raipur Ongoing 1.95 km
29 ASHOKA KOHINOOR PHASE - 2 Raipur Ongoing 1.96 km
30 OM RAJ ENCLAVE Raipur Ongoing 1.98 km

Buyer Checklist

Documents and verifications a buyer should review before purchase.

Buyer Document Verification Checklist

Key documents a buyer should verify before purchasing in this project. Items marked Available have data on Seemankan.

10/14 verified
  • RERA Registration Certificate Available
    Confirms the project is registered with RERA CG. Verify registration number, validity dates, and project details on the RERA portal.
    RERA No: PCGRERA291218000884
    View Certificate View on RERA Portal
  • Promoter Registration Certificate Available
    Builder / colonizer company registration certificate. Confirms the promoter entity is a registered firm, company, or society.
    Preview Preview
  • Approved Building / Sanction Plan Verify Independently
    Building plan sanctioned by the local authority. Verify floor count, setbacks, and FSI compliance.
  • Layout Plan Available
    Approved layout showing plot divisions, roads, open spaces, and common areas.
    Preview
  • Title Deed / Ownership Proof Available
    Proof that the promoter legally owns the land. Verify via Sub-Registrar records.
    Preview
  • Encumbrance Certificate Available
    Confirms the property is free from legal dues, mortgages, or liens. Obtain from Sub-Registrar office.
    Preview
  • Land Use / Diversion Certificate Verify Independently
    Required if land was converted from agricultural to non-agricultural use.
  • Architect Certificate Available
    Certification from a registered architect confirming structural plans and compliance.
    View View View +27 more
  • Structural Engineer Certificate Available
    Certification from a structural engineer confirming building safety and load-bearing capacity.
    View View View +27 more
  • CA Financial Certificate Available
    Chartered Accountant certificate on financial status, project cost estimates, and fund utilization.
    Preview View View +28 more
  • Commencement Certificate Verify Independently
    Permission to begin construction issued by the local authority after plan approval.
  • NOCs (No Objection Certificates) Verify Independently
    NOCs from fire department, environment, water supply, electricity board, and other authorities.
  • Project Brochure / Specification Available
    Official brochure with unit types, amenities, and specifications. Compare with actual delivery.
    View View View +11 more
  • RERA Compliance Orders Available
    Check if any orders, penalties, or directions have been issued against this project by RERA.
    11 order(s) on record — review in Legal tab
Disclaimer: This checklist is for informational purposes only. "Available" means Seemankan has a copy from the RERA portal — it does not constitute legal verification. Always verify original documents with the concerned authorities and consult a legal advisor before making a purchase decision.

Risk Zone Within 5 km

Buffer zones (water bodies, airport restrictions) and risk sites (landfills, waste processing) detected within 3 km (immediate) and 5 km (extended) of the project.

25
Risk zones (within 5 km)
3 km: 14 3–5 km: 11
23
Water bodies (river/nala/lake)
3 km: 13 3–5 km: 10
2
Landfill / waste sites
3 km: 1 3–5 km: 1
0
Airport buffer overlap
3 km: 0 3–5 km: 0
Risk Zone Map (3 km & 5 km rings) Project marker centered
Water Bodies (23)
  • Telibandha Nala ≤3 km
    Nala · 20m buffer
    0.15 km
  • Telibandha Talab (Marine Drive) ≤3 km
    Lake · 50m buffer
    0.38 km
  • Muktangan Talab ≤3 km
    Tank · 50m buffer
    0.64 km
  • Kharun Left Bank Canal ≤3 km
    Canal · 20m buffer
    1 km
  • Kharun River ≤3 km
    River · 75m buffer
    1.09 km
  • Shankar Nagar Nala ≤3 km
    Nala · 20m buffer
    1.6 km
  • Heerapur Talab ≤3 km
    Pond · 50m buffer
    2.06 km
  • Amanaka Talab ≤3 km
    Tank · 50m buffer
    2.17 km
Landfill / Waste Sites (2)
  • SLRM Centre Tendua (Tundra) ≤3 km
    Waste processing · 200m buffer
    2.83 km
  • Daldal Seoni MSW Transfer Station 3–5 km
    Transfer station · 100m buffer
    4.33 km

Reviews

Verified buyer reviews and ratings for this project.

No reviews yet. Be the first to review this project!

Login to Write a Review

You need to be signed in to submit a review for this project.

Login or Register