Home / RERA Projects / KEDIYA ARCADE
NOT REGISTERED RERA Page
GENERATE REPORT

KEDIYA ARCADE

21.2787, 81.8661 Explore area
District
—
Area
—
Promoter
MR. PRAKASH KEDIYA
Project Information
Promoter MR. PRAKASH KEDIYA
Type —
Status Not Registered
Completion —
RERA No. —
Registered —
Address Chhattisgarh, India
At a Glance
-
Total Units
-
Units Sold
-
Unsold
1
Legal Cases
-
Target Completion
-
Completion
Project Analysis

360° Project Intelligence

Comprehensive analysis across regulatory, livability, market, filing activity, and market readiness dimensions.

Regulatory
0
0 of 14 checks · Weak Signals
Livability
59
Sector 2 · Moderate Signals
Legal
1
1 legal order(s) · 0 nearby
Filing Activity
0
0 docs · 0 quarterly updates
Market Readiness
25
Not Registered
Area Livability

Livability of Sector 2

Eighteen environmental, infrastructure and amenity parameters for the nearest mapped area (Sector 2 — 8.98 km from this project). Click any parameter for the underlying readings, thresholds and what they mean.



🏠 Livability Parameters

Latest readings for Sector 2. Only parameters with available data are shown below. Based on the latest readings for Sector 2.

C
Composite Score
58.8 /100
Average

🌬️ Air Quality

Final Score: 99.6/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Air Quality?AQI summarizes PM2.5, PM10 and gases. Lower pollution values improve public health outcomes.
AQI
51
Satisfactory
PM2.5
30.8 µg/m³
≤ 40
PM10
58.7 µg/m³
≤ 60
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
PM2.5 30.8 µg/m³ ≤ 40
Good
PM10 58.7 µg/m³ ≤ 60
Good
NO₂ 8.2 µg/m³ ≤ 40
Good
💡 What does this mean for you?Cleaner air lowers respiratory burden and improves outdoor comfort.

💧 Water Quality

Final Score: 84.6/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Water Quality?Water quality combines chemistry, supply duration and contamination markers.
TDS
205 ppm
≤ 500
pH
7.74
6.5–8.5
Supply
9.2 hr/day
≥ 8 hr
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
TDS 205 ppm ≤ 500
Good
Fluoride 0.43 mg/L ≤ 1.0
Good
Turbidity 2.8 NTU ≤ 1
Concern
💡 What does this mean for you?Better supply quality and consistency reduces dependence on tanker/groundwater fallback.

🧹 Sanitation

Final Score: 92.8/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Sanitation?Sanitation reflects ODF status, sewage treatment and waste management regularity.
ODF
ODF++
ODF++
Sewage Coverage
90%
≥ 80%
Drainage
95%
≥ 90%
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
ODF Status ODF++ ODF++
Info
Sewage Coverage 90% ≥ 80%
Good
Drainage Coverage 95% ≥ 90%
Good
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher sanitation maturity lowers disease exposure and neighborhood nuisance.

🛣️ Infrastructure

Final Score: 32.7/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Infrastructure?Infrastructure score combines land use, urbanization, built form, night lights and terrain indicators.
Built-up
6.6%
Balanced band
Tree Cover
3.4%
≥ 15%
Urbanization
11.3
Higher better
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Built-up (LULC) 6.6% 40-70%
Contextual
Impervious Surface 27.6% < 70%
Good
NDVI Mean 0.210 > 0.3
Concern
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Built-up (LULC) % 7.9% 5.4% 6.6%
Tree Cover % 2.9% 3.9% 3.4%
Urbanization Index 10.0 12.7 11.3
Infra Score 34.8 30.5 32.7
💡 What does this mean for you?Balanced built + green mix usually improves long-term livability resilience.

🏥 Amenities

Final Score: 41.6/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Amenities?Amenity score captures daily-access services in walk/short-drive radii.
Hospitals 500m
1
Target ≥1
Schools 1km
2
Target ≥3
Parks 500m
0
Target ≥1
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Hospitals (500m) 1 ≥1
Good
Schools (1km) 2 ≥3
Concern
Markets (1km) 0 ≥1
Concern
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher local amenity density improves convenience and walkability.

🌳 Green Cover

Final Score: 58.3/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Green Cover?NDVI and vegetation structure are measured from satellite imagery to estimate neighborhood greenery.
NDVI Mean
0.360
Greenness index
Vegetation
44.0%
% green pixels
Dense Green
34.0%
Thick canopy
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
NDVI Mean 0.360 0.5 maps to score 100
Weighted 40%
Vegetation % 44.0% Direct % (cap 100)
Weighted 30%
Dense Green % 34.0% Scaled from 50%
Weighted 20%
Parks within 500m 0 Count * 33 (cap 100)
Weighted 10%
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
NDVI Mean 0.339 0.381 0.360
Vegetation % 40.2% 47.8% 44.0%
Dense Green % 34.4% 33.6% 34.0%
Tree Canopy % 22.9% 25.6% 24.2%
Green Score 52.9 58.3 55.6
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher green metrics typically reduce heat stress and improve comfort.

🔊 Noise

Final Score: 100.0/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Noise?Noise uses measured day/night dB compared to CPCB zone limits.
Day dB
60.7
vs CPCB day limit
Night dB
55.6
vs CPCB night limit
Zone
residential
CPCB class
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Day Noise 60.7 dB ≤ 55.0 dB
Concern
Night Noise 55.6 dB ≤ 45.0 dB
Concern
Nearest Highway — m Higher usually quieter
Info
💡 What does this mean for you?Chronic high noise impacts stress, sleep quality and perceived comfort.

🌊 Flood Risk

Final Score: 10.0/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Flood Risk?Flood risk combines river exposure and local waterlogging vulnerability.
Overall Risk
Lowest
Lower is safer
River Risk
Low
Lower is safer
Waterlogging
Low
Lower is safer
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Overall Risk Lowest Low preferred
Info
River Flood Risk Low Low preferred
Info
Waterlogging Risk Low Low preferred
Info
💡 What does this mean for you?Lower flood risk means less disruption and lower hazard exposure.

🏚️ Earthquake Risk

Final Score: 10.0/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Earthquake Risk?Earthquake profile uses seismic zone, PGA and soil/liquefaction risk factors.
Seismic Zone
Zone II
Lower risk zone preferred
Risk Level
Low
Low preferred
Liquefaction
None
Low preferred
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Seismic Zone Zone II II preferred
Info
Risk Level Low Low preferred
Info
PGA (475yr) 0.0155g Lower preferred
Info
💡 What does this mean for you?Lower seismic hazard reduces structural and insurance risk exposure.

🌡️ Land Surface Temp

Final Score: 61.1/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Land Surface Temp?Land Surface Temperature reflects heat-island intensity from satellite thermal bands.
LST Mean
29.7°C
Lower better
LST Min
10.1°C
Context
LST Max
39.5°C
Lower better
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
LST Mean 29.7°C 20°C best / 45°C worst
Weighted by formula
LST Score 61.1 0-100
Computed
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
LST Mean (°C) 30.0 29.4 29.7
LST Min (°C) 12.6 7.7 10.1
LST Max (°C) 38.8 40.1 39.5
LST Score 59.9 62.4 61.1
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher heat exposure affects comfort, cooling load and health risk.

🏗️ Built-up Density

Final Score: 93.4/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Built-up Density?Built-up density measures extent of developed surface versus open space.
Built-up %
6.6%
Lower better
Open Space %
93.4%
Higher better
Built-up Score
93.4
0-100
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Built-up % 6.6% Inverse scoring
Score = 100 - builtup%
Open Space % 93.4% Context
Info
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Built-up % 7.9% 5.4% 6.6%
Open Space % 92.1% 94.6% 93.4%
Built-up Score 92.1 94.6 93.4
💡 What does this mean for you?Very high built-up often raises heat and runoff while reducing open environmental buffers.

💡 Night-time Lights

Final Score: 12.0/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Night-time Lights?Nighttime lights are a proxy for economic activity and electrification intensity.
Avg Radiance
6.01
Higher better
Max Radiance
9.10
Context
NTL Score
12.0
0-100
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Avg Radiance 6.01 Scaled to 50
Score = min(100, avg/50*100)
NTL Score 12.0 0-100
Computed
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Avg Radiance 6.03 5.98 6.01
Max Radiance 8.88 9.31 9.10
NTL Score 12.1 12.0 12.0
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher radiance often indicates stronger urban activity but can correlate with light pollution.

🏞️ Water Bodies

Final Score: 100.0/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Water Bodies?Water-bodies score reflects permanent and seasonal water presence in the analysis radius.
Permanent Water
65.96%
Higher generally better
Seasonal Water
96.85%
Context
Water Score
100.0
0-100
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Permanent Water % 65.96% 70% weight
Scaled against 10%
Seasonal Water % 96.85% 30% weight
Scaled against 20%
Water Score 100.0 0-100
Computed
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Permanent Water % 63.45% 68.47% 65.96%
Seasonal Water % 96.37% 97.33% 96.85%
Water Score 100.0 100.0 100.0
💡 What does this mean for you?Water presence can support cooling, recharge and ecological quality.

👥 Population Density

Final Score: 97.0/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Population Density?Population density indicates urban crowding pressure around the area.
Population
9,455
Estimated residents
Density/km²
603.9
Lower better for this score
Score
97.0
0-100
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Density/km² 603.9 Inverse scale up to 20,000
Lower -> higher score
Score 97.0 0-100
Computed
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Population Total 1,905 17,004 9,455
Density / km² 606.3 601.4 603.9
Pop Density Score 97.0 97.0 97.0
💡 What does this mean for you?Extremely high density can increase pressure on services and mobility.

⛲ Groundwater

Final Score: 66.8/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Groundwater?Groundwater score combines moisture, recharge, drought and trend indicators.
Soil Moisture
146.374
Higher better
Recharge
1.20
Higher better
PDSI
3.58
Higher better
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Soil Moisture 146.374 30% weight
Scaled
Recharge 1.20 25% weight
Scaled
PDSI 3.58 20% weight
Scaled
SM Trend 0.0000 15% weight
Scaled
Precipitation 1,847.52 10% weight
Scaled
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Soil Moisture 145.408 147.340 146.374
Recharge Estimate 1.40 0.99 1.20
PDSI 3.60 3.56 3.58
Groundwater Score 66.7 66.9 66.8
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher score suggests better long-term aquifer and moisture support conditions.

🌧️ Waterlogging

↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Waterlogging?Waterlogging combines topography, imperviousness and wetness indices across nearby grid cells.
Grid Count
54
Sampled cells
Avg Susceptibility
46.9
Lower is safer
High Risk Grids
16
High / Very High
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTargetStatus
Avg Susceptibility 46.9 < 40
Concern
Avg Slope 2.76° > 1°
Good
Avg Impervious 4.3% < 70%
Good
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher susceptibility and low slope increase monsoon water stagnation probability.

🚶 Walkability & Safety

↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Walkability & Safety?OSM amenity metrics reflect pedestrian, safety and urban accessibility infrastructure.
Footpaths
0
Higher better
Street Lamps
0
Higher better
Police/Fire Access
0
Presence
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Footpaths (500m) 0 ≥ 3
Concern
Sidewalk Roads (1km) 0 ≥ 5
Concern
Nearest Police Station — m ≤ 2000m
Context
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher OSM accessibility/safety features generally improve everyday livability.

🌬️ Air Quality: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

💧 Water Quality: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🧹 Sanitation: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🛣️ Infrastructure: Infrastructure Score Formula

Formula: Composite weighted model from GHSL/ESA/VIIRS/Terrain features
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Urbanization index11.3420%SMOD
Built-up balance6.6%15%Best in moderate band
NTL stability58.0%15%Power/activity consistency
Avg building height0.76 m10%Vertical infra proxy
Impervious %27.6%10%Moderate is optimal
Radiance5.5010%Development proxy
Slope0.10°10%Flatter is better
Green support3.4%10%Tree + grass contribution
This is the same weighted structure used in Livability Infrastructure model.
Final: 32.74 / 100

🏥 Amenities: Amenity Score Breakdown

Formula: Each amenity category is capped at 100, final score is averaged across categories
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Hospitals 500m1 * 33Cap 100Health access
Schools 1km2 * 20Cap 100Education access
Markets 1km0 * 33Cap 100Daily needs
Parks 500m0 * 33Cap 100Open space
Transit 1km0 * 50Cap 100Mobility
Category multipliers mirror the Livability snapshot logic.
Final: Final from amenity_scores table

🌳 Green Cover: Green Score Formula

Formula: Score = (NDVI*40%) + (Vegetation*30%) + (Dense Green*20%) + (Parks*10%)
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
NDVI component0.360 => 72.040%28.8
Vegetation component44.0% => 44.030%13.2
Dense green component34.0% => 68.020%13.6
Parks component0 => 0.010%0.0
This matches the Livability GreenCover model weighting logic.
Final: 55.59 / 100

🔊 Noise: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🌊 Flood Risk: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🏚️ Earthquake Risk: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🌡️ Land Surface Temp: LST Score Formula

Formula: Score = ((45 - LST Mean) / 25) * 100, clipped to [0,100]
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
LST Mean29.72 °CReference20°C best, 45°C worst
Lower land surface temperature means better livability.
Final: 61.12 / 100

🏗️ Built-up Density: Built-up Score Formula

Formula: Score = 100 - Built-up %
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Built-up %6.6%InverseLower is better
Dense concrete surfaces reduce infiltration and increase heat islands.
Final: 93.36 / 100

💡 Night-time Lights: Night-time Lights Formula

Formula: Score = min(100, (Avg Radiance / 50) * 100)
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Avg Radiance6.01Scale 0-50Higher indicates activity
Higher night radiance generally tracks electrification and economic intensity.
Final: 12.01 / 100

🏞️ Water Bodies: Water Bodies Score Formula

Formula: Score = (Permanent Water Score * 70%) + (Seasonal Water Score * 30%)
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Permanent water65.96%70%Scaled against 10% benchmark
Seasonal water96.85%30%Scaled against 20% benchmark
Permanent water has higher score weight than seasonal water.
Final: 100.00 / 100

👥 Population Density: Population Density Formula

Formula: Score = ((20000 - density_per_km²) / 20000) * 100, clipped to [0,100]
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Density603.9 /km²Inverse scaleLower density -> higher score
This follows the Livability PopulationDensity model.
Final: 96.98 / 100

⛲ Groundwater: Groundwater Score Formula

Formula: Weighted: Soil Moisture 30% + Recharge 25% + PDSI 20% + Trend 15% + Precipitation 10%
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Soil moisture146.37430%Scaled to 0-200
Recharge estimate1.2025%Scaled -200 to +400
PDSI3.5820%Scaled -4 to +4
SM trend0.000015%Scaled -50 to +50
Precipitation1,847.5210%Scaled 800 to 1800
Exactly reused from Livability Groundwater model logic.
Final: 66.80 / 100

🌧️ Waterlogging: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🚶 Walkability & Safety: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

View full livability report for Sector 2 →

Compliance Status

RERA registration, filings, and compliance flags based on public CG-RERA records.

Compliance Status Based on public CG-RERA records
2 Passed
4 N/A
Registration Status Unknown
Status not available on CG-RERA portal
Section 3 · Source
No Penalty Orders
1 order(s) on record, none with penalty sections (Sec 38/39/40/59/61/63)
Sec 38–63 · Source
No Recent Orders
No orders filed in the last 12 months (older: 1)
Source
Completion Date Not Available
No proposed completion date on CG-RERA portal
Section 4 · Source
Quarterly Updates Not Available
No compliance snapshot data on record
Section 11 · Source
Annual Audit Not Available
No compliance snapshot data on record
Section 4(2)(l)(D) · Source
Each check is based on publicly available CG-RERA portal data as of May 2026. How this works →

Details

Registration, professional team, bank, promoters, and compliance history.

Registration Details
RERA Number
-
Status
Not Registered
Project Type
-
View on Map
Promoters
M
MR. PRAKASH KEDIYA

Legal Orders & Cases

RERA legal orders, complaints, and case statistics filed against this project.

1
Total Cases
0
Last 12 Months
1
Older Cases
1
PDFs Available
Legal Orders (1)
ComplaintApplicantSectionDateSourcePDF
SM-PRO-2021-01509 CG-RERA Section 3,Section 4 03 Dec 2021 This project

Location

Project address, coordinates, and nearby places.

Location Details
Address
Chhattisgarh, India
District
-
Tehsil
-
Coordinates
21.2786567, 81.8661442 View on Map
Area Livability

Livability of Sector 2 Naya Raipur

Environmental, infrastructure & amenity parameters for the area where this project is located (8.98 km from project). Each value is compared with the Naya Raipur average.

Composite Livability Score
58.8 / 100
Grade C · Average
+3.4 vs Naya Raipur avg (55.4)
Air Quality
99.6 Excellent
Area
100
City
100
+0.0 vs city avg
Water Quality
84.6 Excellent
Area
85
City
85
-0.8 vs city avg
Sanitation
92.8 Excellent
Area
93
City
80
+13.0 vs city avg
Green Cover
58.3 Average
Area
58
City
52
+6.4 vs city avg
Noise Level
100.0 Excellent
Area
100
City
85
+15.5 vs city avg
Infrastructure
32.7 Poor
Area
33
City
35
-2.6 vs city avg
Amenities
41.6 Below Avg
Area
42
City
44
-2.4 vs city avg
Flood Safety
10.0 Poor
Area
10
City
10
+0.0 vs city avg
Earthquake Safety
10.0 Poor
Area
10
City
10
+0.0 vs city avg
Land Surface Temp.
61.1 Average
Area
61
City
63
-1.4 vs city avg
Built-up Density
93.4 Excellent
Area
93
City
91
+2.7 vs city avg
Night-light Activity
12.0 Poor
Area
12
City
22
-10.1 vs city avg
Water Bodies Nearby
100.0 Excellent
Area
100
City
92
+7.7 vs city avg
Population Density
97.0 Excellent
Area
97
City
95
+1.8 vs city avg
Groundwater Status
66.8 Good
Area
67
City
66
+0.6 vs city avg
View detailed livability report for Sector 2
Neighborhood Intelligence

Explore nearby infrastructure around this project. Toggle categories to show/hide on the map.

Neighborhood Map 3 km radius

Buyer Checklist

Documents and verifications a buyer should review before purchase.

Buyer Document Verification Checklist

Key documents a buyer should verify before purchasing in this project. Items marked Available have data on Seemankan.

1/14 verified
  • RERA Registration Certificate Verify Independently
    Confirms the project is registered with RERA CG. Verify registration number, validity dates, and project details on the RERA portal.
  • Promoter Registration Certificate Verify Independently
    Builder / colonizer company registration certificate. Confirms the promoter entity is a registered firm, company, or society.
  • Approved Building / Sanction Plan Verify Independently
    Building plan sanctioned by the local authority. Verify floor count, setbacks, and FSI compliance.
  • Layout Plan Verify Independently
    Approved layout showing plot divisions, roads, open spaces, and common areas.
  • Title Deed / Ownership Proof Verify Independently
    Proof that the promoter legally owns the land. Verify via Sub-Registrar records.
  • Encumbrance Certificate Verify Independently
    Confirms the property is free from legal dues, mortgages, or liens. Obtain from Sub-Registrar office.
  • Land Use / Diversion Certificate Verify Independently
    Required if land was converted from agricultural to non-agricultural use.
  • Architect Certificate Verify Independently
    Certification from a registered architect confirming structural plans and compliance.
  • Structural Engineer Certificate Verify Independently
    Certification from a structural engineer confirming building safety and load-bearing capacity.
  • CA Financial Certificate Verify Independently
    Chartered Accountant certificate on financial status, project cost estimates, and fund utilization.
  • Commencement Certificate Verify Independently
    Permission to begin construction issued by the local authority after plan approval.
  • NOCs (No Objection Certificates) Verify Independently
    NOCs from fire department, environment, water supply, electricity board, and other authorities.
  • Project Brochure / Specification Verify Independently
    Official brochure with unit types, amenities, and specifications. Compare with actual delivery.
  • RERA Compliance Orders Available
    Check if any orders, penalties, or directions have been issued against this project by RERA.
    1 order(s) on record — review in Legal tab
Disclaimer: This checklist is for informational purposes only. "Available" means Seemankan has a copy from the RERA portal — it does not constitute legal verification. Always verify original documents with the concerned authorities and consult a legal advisor before making a purchase decision.

Risk Zone Within 5 km

Buffer zones (water bodies, airport restrictions) and risk sites (landfills, waste processing) detected within 3 km (immediate) and 5 km (extended) of the project.

0
Risk zones (within 5 km)
3 km: 0 3–5 km: 0
0
Water bodies (river/nala/lake)
3 km: 0 3–5 km: 0
0
Landfill / waste sites
3 km: 0 3–5 km: 0
0
Airport buffer overlap
3 km: 0 3–5 km: 0
Risk Zone Map (3 km & 5 km rings) Project marker centered
All Clear

No mapped risk zones within 3 km of this project.

Reviews

Verified buyer reviews and ratings for this project.

No reviews yet. Be the first to review this project!

Login to Write a Review

You need to be signed in to submit a review for this project.

Login or Register