NEW Plotted Development RERA Page Project Website

GENERATE REPORT

AVINASH NEW TOWN

21.2321, 81.5192 Explore area

District

Durg

Area

—

Promoter

COSMOS DEVELOPERS

Project Information

Promoter COSMOS DEVELOPERS

Type Plotted Development

Status New

Completion 29 Sep 2026

RERA No. PCGRERA300120001084

Registered 30 Jan 2020

Original End 31 Dec 2023

Total Units 725 · 454 sold

EWS Category NO

Construction Cost ₹ 365199000

Land Cost ₹ 743215000

Authorised Person mukesh singhania

Website www.avinashdevelopers.com

Address VILLAGE KUKDA & PARSADA ,TAHSIL-PATAN ,DIST- DURG

At a Glance

725

Total Units

454

Units Sold

244

Unsold

Legal Cases

Sep 2026

Target Completion

100%

Completion

Amenities & Facilities (15)

BOUNDARY WALL

100%

CLUB HOUSE

100%

COMMUNITY BUILDINGS

100%

ENERGY MAANAGEMENT

100%

GYM

100%

INTERNAL ROADS AND FOOTPATHS

100%

LANDSCAPING AND TREE PLANTING

100%

PLACE OF WORSHIP

100%

SECURITY SERVICE

100%

SEWERAGE

100%

STORM WATER DRAINS

100%

STREET LIGHTING

100%

TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL OF SEWERAGE AND SULLAGE WAT

100%

WATER CONSERVATION RAIN WATER HARVESTING

100%

WATER SUPPLY

100%

Project Professionals

TAPAN KUMAR SHARMA

STATUTORY CA

DINESH DEWANGAN

QUARTERLY CA

VISHEK BISEN

ENGINEER

AKHILESH GUPTA

ARCHITECT

Project Analysis

360° Project Intelligence

Comprehensive analysis across regulatory, livability, market, filing activity, and market readiness dimensions.

Regulatory

12 of 14 checks · Strong Signals

Livability

Amleshwar North · Moderate Signals

Legal

No legal orders on record · 12 nearby

Filing Activity

424

352 docs · 72 quarterly updates

Market Readiness

New · due Sep 2026

Area Livability

Livability of Amleshwar North

Eighteen environmental, infrastructure and amenity parameters for the nearest mapped area (Amleshwar North — 5.72 km from this project). Click any parameter for the underlying readings, thresholds and what they mean.

🏠 Livability Parameters

Latest readings for Amleshwar North. Only parameters with available data are shown below. Based on the latest readings for Amleshwar North.

Composite Score

68.6 /100

Good

🌬️ Air Quality

Final Score: 92.4/100 ↑ Higher is Better

ℹ️ What is Air Quality?AQI summarizes PM2.5, PM10 and gases. Lower pollution values improve public health outcomes.

AQI

Satisfactory

PM2.5

23.6 µg/m³

≤ 40

PM10

146.5 µg/m³

≤ 60

Scoring Breakdown

Parameter	Value	Target / Rule	Status
PM2.5	23.6 µg/m³	≤ 40	Good
PM10	146.5 µg/m³	≤ 60	Concern
NO₂	22.0 µg/m³	≤ 40	Good

💡 What does this mean for you?Cleaner air lowers respiratory burden and improves outdoor comfort.

💧 Water Quality

Final Score: 48.1/100 ↑ Higher is Better

ℹ️ What is Water Quality?Water quality combines chemistry, supply duration and contamination markers.

TDS

412 ppm

≤ 500

7.04

6.5–8.5

Supply

7.1 hr/day

≥ 8 hr

Scoring Breakdown

Parameter	Value	Target / Rule	Status
TDS	412 ppm	≤ 500	Good
Fluoride	0.87 mg/L	≤ 1.0	Good
Turbidity	5.5 NTU	≤ 1	Concern

💡 What does this mean for you?Better supply quality and consistency reduces dependence on tanker/groundwater fallback.

🧹 Sanitation

Final Score: 75.3/100 ↑ Higher is Better

ℹ️ What is Sanitation?Sanitation reflects ODF status, sewage treatment and waste management regularity.

ODF

ODF++

Sewage Coverage

62%

≥ 80%

Drainage

67%

≥ 90%

Scoring Breakdown

Parameter	Value	Target / Rule	Status
ODF Status	ODF++	ODF++	Info
Sewage Coverage	62%	≥ 80%	Concern
Drainage Coverage	67%	≥ 90%	Concern

💡 What does this mean for you?Higher sanitation maturity lowers disease exposure and neighborhood nuisance.

🛣️ Infrastructure

Final Score: 39.6/100 ↑ Higher is Better

ℹ️ What is Infrastructure?Infrastructure score combines land use, urbanization, built form, night lights and terrain indicators.

Built-up

38.9%

Balanced band

Tree Cover

16.5%

≥ 15%

Urbanization

21.9

Higher better

Scoring Breakdown

Parameter	Value	Target / Rule	Status
Built-up (LULC)	38.9%	40-70%	Contextual
Impervious Surface	29.3%	< 70%	Good
NDVI Mean	0.228	> 0.3	Concern

💡 What does this mean for you?Balanced built + green mix usually improves long-term livability resilience.

🏥 Amenities

Final Score: 30.3/100 ↑ Higher is Better

ℹ️ What is Amenities?Amenity score captures daily-access services in walk/short-drive radii.

Hospitals 500m

Target ≥1

Schools 1km

Target ≥3

Parks 500m

Target ≥1

Scoring Breakdown

Parameter	Value	Target / Rule	Status
Hospitals (500m)	0	≥1	Concern
Schools (1km)	0	≥3	Concern
Markets (1km)	4	≥1	Good

💡 What does this mean for you?Higher local amenity density improves convenience and walkability.

🌳 Green Cover

Final Score: 61.6/100 ↑ Higher is Better

ℹ️ What is Green Cover?NDVI and vegetation structure are measured from satellite imagery to estimate neighborhood greenery.

NDVI Mean

0.364

Greenness index

Vegetation

56.7%

% green pixels

Dense Green

26.4%

Thick canopy

Scoring Breakdown

Parameter	Value	Target / Rule	Status
NDVI Mean	0.364	0.5 maps to score 100	Weighted 40%
Vegetation %	56.7%	Direct % (cap 100)	Weighted 30%
Dense Green %	26.4%	Scaled from 50%	Weighted 20%
Parks within 500m	2	Count * 33 (cap 100)	Weighted 10%

💡 What does this mean for you?Higher green metrics typically reduce heat stress and improve comfort.

🔊 Noise

Final Score: 95.4/100 ↑ Higher is Better

ℹ️ What is Noise?Noise uses measured day/night dB compared to CPCB zone limits.

Day dB

43.9

vs CPCB day limit

Night dB

39.5

vs CPCB night limit

Zone

residential

CPCB class

Scoring Breakdown

Parameter	Value	Target / Rule	Status
Day Noise	43.9 dB	≤ 55.0 dB	Good
Night Noise	39.5 dB	≤ 45.0 dB	Good
Nearest Highway	1,682 m	Higher usually quieter	Info

💡 What does this mean for you?Chronic high noise impacts stress, sleep quality and perceived comfort.

🌊 Flood Risk

Final Score: 81.8/100 ↑ Higher is Better

ℹ️ What is Flood Risk?Flood risk combines river exposure and local waterlogging vulnerability.

Overall Risk

Low

Lower is safer

River Risk

Low

Lower is safer

Waterlogging

Low

Lower is safer

Scoring Breakdown

Parameter	Value	Target / Rule	Status
Overall Risk	Low	Low preferred	Info
River Flood Risk	Low	Low preferred	Info
Waterlogging Risk	Low	Low preferred	Info

💡 What does this mean for you?Lower flood risk means less disruption and lower hazard exposure.

🏚️ Earthquake Risk

Final Score: 87.7/100 ↑ Higher is Better

ℹ️ What is Earthquake Risk?Earthquake profile uses seismic zone, PGA and soil/liquefaction risk factors.

Seismic Zone

Lower risk zone preferred

Risk Level

Low

Low preferred

Liquefaction

Low

Low preferred

Scoring Breakdown

Parameter	Value	Target / Rule	Status
Seismic Zone	II	II preferred	Info
Risk Level	Low	Low preferred	Info
PGA (475yr)	0.067	Lower preferred	Info

💡 What does this mean for you?Lower seismic hazard reduces structural and insurance risk exposure.

🌡️ Land Surface Temp

Final Score: 65.4/100 ↑ Higher is Better

ℹ️ What is Land Surface Temp?Land Surface Temperature reflects heat-island intensity from satellite thermal bands.

LST Mean

28.7°C

Lower better

LST Min

13.7°C

Context

LST Max

38.4°C

Lower better

Scoring Breakdown

Parameter	Value	Target / Rule	Status
LST Mean	28.7°C	20°C best / 45°C worst	Weighted by formula
LST Score	65.4	0-100	Computed

Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison

Parameter	1000m	3000m	Average (Final)
LST Mean (°C)	30.2	27.1	28.7
LST Min (°C)	13.8	13.5	13.7
LST Max (°C)	36.2	40.5	38.4
LST Score	59.3	71.5	65.4

💡 What does this mean for you?Higher heat exposure affects comfort, cooling load and health risk.

🏗️ Built-up Density

Final Score: 67.3/100 ↑ Higher is Better

ℹ️ What is Built-up Density?Built-up density measures extent of developed surface versus open space.

Built-up %

32.7%

Lower better

Open Space %

67.3%

Higher better

Built-up Score

67.3

0-100

Scoring Breakdown

Parameter	Value	Target / Rule	Status
Built-up %	32.7%	Inverse scoring	Score = 100 - builtup%
Open Space %	67.3%	Context	Info

Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison

Parameter	1000m	3000m	Average (Final)
Built-up %	43.7%	21.6%	32.7%
Open Space %	56.3%	78.4%	67.3%
Built-up Score	56.3	78.4	67.3

💡 What does this mean for you?Very high built-up often raises heat and runoff while reducing open environmental buffers.

💡 Night-time Lights

Final Score: 21.3/100 ↑ Higher is Better

ℹ️ What is Night-time Lights?Nighttime lights are a proxy for economic activity and electrification intensity.

Avg Radiance

10.66

Higher better

Max Radiance

20.96

Context

NTL Score

21.3

0-100

Scoring Breakdown

Parameter	Value	Target / Rule	Status
Avg Radiance	10.66	Scaled to 50	Score = min(100, avg/50*100)
NTL Score	21.3	0-100	Computed

Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison

Parameter	1000m	3000m	Average (Final)
Avg Radiance	12.19	9.13	10.66
Max Radiance	12.00	29.93	20.96
NTL Score	24.4	18.3	21.3

💡 What does this mean for you?Higher radiance often indicates stronger urban activity but can correlate with light pollution.

🏞️ Water Bodies

Final Score: 25.8/100 ↑ Higher is Better

ℹ️ What is Water Bodies?Water-bodies score reflects permanent and seasonal water presence in the analysis radius.

Permanent Water

7.38%

Higher generally better

Seasonal Water

77.72%

Context

Water Score

81.7

0-100

Scoring Breakdown

Parameter	Value	Target / Rule	Status
Permanent Water %	7.38%	70% weight	Scaled against 10%
Seasonal Water %	77.72%	30% weight	Scaled against 20%
Water Score	81.7	0-100	Computed

Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison

Parameter	1000m	3000m	Average (Final)
Permanent Water %	6.66%	8.09%	7.38%
Seasonal Water %	83.44%	72.00%	77.72%
Water Score	23.3	28.3	81.7

💡 What does this mean for you?Water presence can support cooling, recharge and ecological quality.

👥 Population Density

Final Score: 92.2/100 ↑ Higher is Better

ℹ️ What is Population Density?Population density indicates urban crowding pressure around the area.

Population

20,906

Estimated residents

Density/km²

1,561.2

Lower better for this score

Score

92.2

0-100

Scoring Breakdown

Parameter	Value	Target / Rule	Status
Density/km²	1,561.2	Inverse scale up to 20,000	Lower -> higher score
Score	92.2	0-100	Computed

Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison

Parameter	1000m	3000m	Average (Final)
Population Total	5,809	36,002	20,906
Density / km²	1,849.0	1,273.3	1,561.2
Pop Density Score	90.8	93.6	92.2

💡 What does this mean for you?Extremely high density can increase pressure on services and mobility.

⛲ Groundwater

Final Score: 66.1/100 ↑ Higher is Better

ℹ️ What is Groundwater?Groundwater score combines moisture, recharge, drought and trend indicators.

Soil Moisture

152.654

Higher better

Recharge

1.06

Higher better

PDSI

2.49

Higher better

Scoring Breakdown

Parameter	Value	Target / Rule	Status
Soil Moisture	152.654	30% weight	Scaled
Recharge	1.06	25% weight	Scaled
PDSI	2.49	20% weight	Scaled
SM Trend	-11.5935	15% weight	Scaled
Precipitation	1,567.48	10% weight	Scaled

Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison

Parameter	1000m	3000m	Average (Final)
Soil Moisture	157.950	147.357	152.654
Recharge Estimate	1.06	1.06	1.06
PDSI	2.13	2.85	2.49
Groundwater Score	59.2	72.9	60.9

💡 What does this mean for you?Higher score suggests better long-term aquifer and moisture support conditions.

🌧️ Waterlogging

↑ Higher is Better

ℹ️ What is Waterlogging?Waterlogging combines topography, imperviousness and wetness indices across nearby grid cells.

Grid Count

Sampled cells

Avg Susceptibility

52.2

Lower is safer

High Risk Grids

High / Very High

Scoring Breakdown

Parameter	Value	Target	Status
Avg Susceptibility	52.2	< 40	Concern
Avg Slope	2.33°	> 1°	Good
Avg Impervious	3.5%	< 70%	Good

💡 What does this mean for you?Higher susceptibility and low slope increase monsoon water stagnation probability.

🚶 Walkability & Safety

↑ Higher is Better

ℹ️ What is Walkability & Safety?OSM amenity metrics reflect pedestrian, safety and urban accessibility infrastructure.

Footpaths

Higher better

Street Lamps

Higher better

Police/Fire Access

Presence

Scoring Breakdown

Parameter	Value	Target / Rule	Status
Footpaths (500m)	1	≥ 3	Concern
Sidewalk Roads (1km)	2	≥ 5	Concern
Nearest Police Station	— m	≤ 2000m	Context

💡 What does this mean for you?Higher OSM accessibility/safety features generally improve everyday livability.

⚠️ Risk Factors

↑ Higher is Better

ℹ️ What is Risk Factors?Nearby hazards and sensitive risk points mapped around this area.

Total Risks

Mapped points

Scoring Breakdown

Category	Risk	Distance / Severity	Meaning
Accessibility	Far from hospital	1260 m / Medium	Nearest hospital >5km away
Accessibility	No bus service	1682 m / Medium	Area lacks regular public bus service
Water_drainage	Open drainage channel	545 m / Low	Uncovered drainage near residential area

💡 What does this mean for you?Closer and severe risks can affect insurance, resale and safety comfort.

🌬️ Air Quality: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.

Component	Value	Weight/Rule	Contribution
Source	area_scores (latest by score_date)	Pipeline	Weighted model in backend

Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.

Final: See card score

💧 Water Quality: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.

Component	Value	Weight/Rule	Contribution
Source	area_scores (latest by score_date)	Pipeline	Weighted model in backend

Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.

Final: See card score

🧹 Sanitation: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.

Component	Value	Weight/Rule	Contribution
Source	area_scores (latest by score_date)	Pipeline	Weighted model in backend

Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.

Final: See card score

🛣️ Infrastructure: Infrastructure Score Formula

Formula: Composite weighted model from GHSL/ESA/VIIRS/Terrain features

Component	Value	Weight/Rule	Contribution
Urbanization index	21.89	20%	SMOD
Built-up balance	38.9%	15%	Best in moderate band
NTL stability	39.6%	15%	Power/activity consistency
Avg building height	4.59 m	10%	Vertical infra proxy
Impervious %	29.3%	10%	Moderate is optimal
Radiance	6.13	10%	Development proxy
Slope	0.88°	10%	Flatter is better
Green support	16.5%	10%	Tree + grass contribution

This is the same weighted structure used in Livability Infrastructure model.

Final: 39.63 / 100

🏥 Amenities: Amenity Score Breakdown

Formula: Each amenity category is capped at 100, final score is averaged across categories

Component	Value	Weight/Rule	Contribution
Hospitals 500m	0 * 33	Cap 100	Health access
Schools 1km	0 * 20	Cap 100	Education access
Markets 1km	4 * 33	Cap 100	Daily needs
Parks 500m	0 * 33	Cap 100	Open space
Transit 1km	0 * 50	Cap 100	Mobility

Category multipliers mirror the Livability snapshot logic.

Final: Final from amenity_scores table

🌳 Green Cover: Green Score Formula

Formula: Score = (NDVI*40%) + (Vegetation*30%) + (Dense Green*20%) + (Parks*10%)

Component	Value	Weight/Rule	Contribution
NDVI component	0.364 => 72.8	40%	29.1
Vegetation component	56.7% => 56.7	30%	17.0
Dense green component	26.4% => 52.8	20%	10.6
Parks component	2 => 66.0	10%	6.6

This matches the Livability GreenCover model weighting logic.

Final: 63.29 / 100

🔊 Noise: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.

Component	Value	Weight/Rule	Contribution
Source	area_scores (latest by score_date)	Pipeline	Weighted model in backend

Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.

Final: See card score

🌊 Flood Risk: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.

Component	Value	Weight/Rule	Contribution
Source	area_scores (latest by score_date)	Pipeline	Weighted model in backend

Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.

Final: See card score

🏚️ Earthquake Risk: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.

Component	Value	Weight/Rule	Contribution
Source	area_scores (latest by score_date)	Pipeline	Weighted model in backend

Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.

Final: See card score

🌡️ Land Surface Temp: LST Score Formula

Formula: Score = ((45 - LST Mean) / 25) * 100, clipped to [0,100]

Component	Value	Weight/Rule	Contribution
LST Mean	28.65 °C	Reference	20°C best, 45°C worst

Lower land surface temperature means better livability.

Final: 65.40 / 100

🏗️ Built-up Density: Built-up Score Formula

Formula: Score = 100 - Built-up %

Component	Value	Weight/Rule	Contribution
Built-up %	32.7%	Inverse	Lower is better

Dense concrete surfaces reduce infiltration and increase heat islands.

Final: 67.33 / 100

💡 Night-time Lights: Night-time Lights Formula

Formula: Score = min(100, (Avg Radiance / 50) * 100)

Component	Value	Weight/Rule	Contribution
Avg Radiance	10.66	Scale 0-50	Higher indicates activity

Higher night radiance generally tracks electrification and economic intensity.

Final: 21.32 / 100

🏞️ Water Bodies: Water Bodies Score Formula

Formula: Score = (Permanent Water Score * 70%) + (Seasonal Water Score * 30%)

Component	Value	Weight/Rule	Contribution
Permanent water	7.38%	70%	Scaled against 10% benchmark
Seasonal water	77.72%	30%	Scaled against 20% benchmark

Permanent water has higher score weight than seasonal water.

Final: 81.66 / 100

👥 Population Density: Population Density Formula

Formula: Score = ((20000 - density_per_km²) / 20000) * 100, clipped to [0,100]

Component	Value	Weight/Rule	Contribution
Density	1,561.2 /km²	Inverse scale	Lower density -> higher score

This follows the Livability PopulationDensity model.

Final: 92.19 / 100

⛲ Groundwater: Groundwater Score Formula

Formula: Weighted: Soil Moisture 30% + Recharge 25% + PDSI 20% + Trend 15% + Precipitation 10%

Component	Value	Weight/Rule	Contribution
Soil moisture	152.654	30%	Scaled to 0-200
Recharge estimate	1.06	25%	Scaled -200 to +400
PDSI	2.49	20%	Scaled -4 to +4
SM trend	-11.5935	15%	Scaled -50 to +50
Precipitation	1,567.48	10%	Scaled 800 to 1800

Exactly reused from Livability Groundwater model logic.

Final: 60.93 / 100

🌧️ Waterlogging: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.

Component	Value	Weight/Rule	Contribution
Source	area_scores (latest by score_date)	Pipeline	Weighted model in backend

Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.

Final: See card score

🚶 Walkability & Safety: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.

Component	Value	Weight/Rule	Contribution
Source	area_scores (latest by score_date)	Pipeline	Weighted model in backend

Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.

Final: See card score

⚠️ Risk Factors: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.

Component	Value	Weight/Rule	Contribution
Source	area_scores (latest by score_date)	Pipeline	Weighted model in backend

Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.

Final: See card score

View full livability report for Amleshwar North →

Compliance Status

RERA registration, filings, and compliance flags based on public CG-RERA records.

Compliance Status Based on public CG-RERA records

4 Passed

2 N/A

RERA Registration Active

Reg No. PCGRERA300120001084 — Status: New

Section 3 · Source · View Certificate · RERA Official Page

No RERA Orders

No complaints or orders found against this project

Sec 38–63 · Source

No Orders in Last 12 Months

Clean record — no complaints or orders filed

Source

Within Timeline

Target completion: 29 Sep 2026

Section 4 · Source

Quarterly Updates Not Available

No compliance snapshot data on record

Section 11 · Source

Annual Audit Not Available

No compliance snapshot data on record

Section 4(2)(l)(D) · Source

Each check is based on publicly available CG-RERA portal data as of Apr 2026. How this works →

Details

Registration, professional team, bank, promoters, and compliance history.

Registration Details

RERA Number: PCGRERA300120001084
Status: New
Project Type: Plotted Development
Approved Date: 30 Jan 2020
Original End Date: 31 Dec 2023

EWS Category: NO
Construction Cost: ₹ 365199000
Land Cost: ₹ 743215000
Proposed Completion: 29 Sep 2026
Authorised Person: mukesh singhania
Website: www.avinashdevelopers.com

View on Map

Professional Team

Role	Name	License / Membership
Statutory CA	TAPAN KUMAR SHARMA	302107
Quarterly CA	Dinesh Dewangan	454646
Engineer	Vishek Bisen	1119
Architect	Akhilesh Gupta	CA/2009/46770

Promoters

cosmos developers Partnership Firm

Legal Orders & Cases

RERA legal orders, complaints, and case statistics filed against this project.

Legal Orders (0)

Complaint	Applicant	Section	Date	Source	PDF
No orders found for this project.

Location

Project address, coordinates, and nearby places.

Location Details

Address: VILLAGE KUKDA & PARSADA ,TAHSIL-PATAN ,DIST- DURG
District: Durg
Tehsil: Patan
Coordinates: 21.2321003, 81.5191917 View on Map

Neighborhood Intelligence

Explore nearby infrastructure around this project. Toggle categories to show/hide on the map.

Neighborhood Map 3 km radius

RERA Projects Near avinash new town 12 found within 3 km

#	Project	District	Status	Distance
1	Lotus city phase- 01	Durg	Ongoing	0.52 km
2	SWASTIK SMART CITY	Durg	New	1.01 km
3	HARSHIT PLATINUM GREEN	Durg	New	1.06 km
4	Lotus city phase- 05	Durg	New	1.11 km
5	VASUNDHARA APPARTMENT	Durg	Ongoing	1.25 km
6	balaji kewalya park -2	Durg	New	1.33 km
7	BALAJI KEWALYA PARK "I"	Durg	New	1.37 km
8	KEWALYA PARK	Durg	Ongoing	1.38 km
9	BALAJI KEWALYA PARK "3"	Durg	New	1.53 km
10	sarthak homes	Durg	Ongoing	1.76 km
11	atal vihar yojna parsada kumhari	Durg	Ongoing	1.89 km
12	ralas royal park	Durg	Ongoing	2.30 km

Buyer Checklist

Documents and verifications a buyer should review before purchase.

Buyer Document Verification Checklist

Key documents a buyer should verify before purchasing in this project. Items marked Available have data on Seemankan.

11/14 verified

RERA Registration Certificate Available

Confirms the project is registered with RERA CG. Verify registration number, validity dates, and project details on the RERA portal.

RERA No: PCGRERA300120001084

View Certificate View on RERA Portal
Promoter Registration Certificate Available

Builder / colonizer company registration certificate. Confirms the promoter entity is a registered firm, company, or society.

Preview Preview
Approved Building / Sanction Plan Verify Independently

Building plan sanctioned by the local authority. Verify floor count, setbacks, and FSI compliance.
Layout Plan Available

Approved layout showing plot divisions, roads, open spaces, and common areas.

Preview
Title Deed / Ownership Proof Available

Proof that the promoter legally owns the land. Verify via Sub-Registrar records.

Preview
Encumbrance Certificate Available

Confirms the property is free from legal dues, mortgages, or liens. Obtain from Sub-Registrar office.

Preview
Land Use / Diversion Certificate Available

Required if land was converted from agricultural to non-agricultural use.

Preview
Architect Certificate Available

Certification from a registered architect confirming structural plans and compliance.

View View View +24 more
Structural Engineer Certificate Available

Certification from a structural engineer confirming building safety and load-bearing capacity.

View View View +24 more
CA Financial Certificate Available

Chartered Accountant certificate on financial status, project cost estimates, and fund utilization.

Preview View View +23 more
Commencement Certificate Available

Permission to begin construction issued by the local authority after plan approval.

Download Download Download +1 more
NOCs (No Objection Certificates) Verify Independently

NOCs from fire department, environment, water supply, electricity board, and other authorities.
Project Brochure / Specification Available

Official brochure with unit types, amenities, and specifications. Compare with actual delivery.

View View View +24 more
RERA Compliance Orders Verify Independently

Check if any orders, penalties, or directions have been issued against this project by RERA.

Risk Zone Within 5 km

Buffer zones (water bodies, airport restrictions) and risk sites (landfills, waste processing) detected within 3 km (immediate) and 5 km (extended) of the project.

Risk zones (within 5 km)

3 km: 0 3–5 km: 3

Water bodies (river/nala/lake)

3 km: 0 3–5 km: 0

Landfill / waste sites

3 km: 0 3–5 km: 3

Airport buffer overlap

3 km: 0 3–5 km: 0

Risk Zone Map (3 km & 5 km rings) Project marker centered

Landfill / Waste Sites (3)

Sarora Trenching Ground 3–5 km

Active landfill · 500m buffer

3.65 km
Sarora Composting / Bio-methanation Plant 3–5 km

Waste processing · 200m buffer

3.76 km
Bhanpuri-Rawabhata Legacy Dump 3–5 km

Legacy dump · 500m buffer

4.24 km

Reviews

Verified buyer reviews and ratings for this project.

No reviews yet. Be the first to review this project!

Login to Write a Review

You need to be signed in to submit a review for this project.