Home / RERA Projects / ISHA VIHAR
ONGOING Plotted Development RERA Page Project Website
GENERATE REPORT

ISHA VIHAR

Compliance Status
Compliant
21.1650, 81.5400 Explore area
District
Durg
Area
—
Promoter
U.S. ASSOCIATES
Project Information
Promoter U.S. ASSOCIATES
Type Plotted Development
Status Ongoing
Completion 30 Mar 2028
RERA No. PCGRERA020818000650
Registered 02 Aug 2018
Original End 30 Jun 2022
Total Units 193 · 91 sold
EWS Category NO
Construction Cost ₹ 93236000
Land Cost ₹ 20442000
Authorised Person SANJAY GUPTA
Website www.usassociates.in
Address VILLAGE - MOTIPUR, PATAN, DURG (C.G.)
At a Glance
193
Total Units
91
Units Sold
42
Unsold
1
Legal Cases
Mar 2028
Target Completion
43%
Completion
Amenities & Facilities (10)
BOUNDARY WALL
100%
INTERNAL ROADS AND FOOTPATHS
64%
LANDSCAPING AND TREE PLANTING
100%
Main Gate
100%
SEWERAGE
76%
SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT AND DISPOSAL
0%
STORM WATER DRAINS
87%
STREET LIGHTING
81%
TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL OF SEWERAGE AND SULLAGE WAT
48%
WATER SUPPLY
60%
Project Professionals
JAYANT BHURA
STATUTORY CA
DEEPAK KUMAR JAIN
QUARTERLY CA
HEM KUMAR JAIN
ENGINEER
PRAPAN JAIN
ARCHITECT
Project Analysis

360° Project Intelligence

Comprehensive analysis across regulatory, livability, market, filing activity, and market readiness dimensions.

Regulatory
71
10 of 14 checks · Moderate Signals
Livability
70
Amleshwar South · Moderate Signals
Legal
1
1 legal order(s) · 0 nearby
Filing Activity
459
369 docs · 90 quarterly updates
Market Readiness
47
Ongoing · due Mar 2028
Area Livability

Livability of Amleshwar South

Eighteen environmental, infrastructure and amenity parameters for the nearest mapped area (Amleshwar South — 4.05 km from this project). Click any parameter for the underlying readings, thresholds and what they mean.



🏠 Livability Parameters

Latest readings for Amleshwar South. Only parameters with available data are shown below. Based on the latest readings for Amleshwar South.

B
Composite Score
69.8 /100
Good

🌬️ Air Quality

Final Score: 92.0/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Air Quality?AQI summarizes PM2.5, PM10 and gases. Lower pollution values improve public health outcomes.
AQI
70
Satisfactory
PM2.5
23.8 µg/m³
≤ 40
PM10
150.0 µg/m³
≤ 60
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
PM2.5 23.8 µg/m³ ≤ 40
Good
PM10 150.0 µg/m³ ≤ 60
Concern
NO₂ 21.5 µg/m³ ≤ 40
Good
💡 What does this mean for you?Cleaner air lowers respiratory burden and improves outdoor comfort.

💧 Water Quality

Final Score: 53.2/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Water Quality?Water quality combines chemistry, supply duration and contamination markers.
TDS
429 ppm
≤ 500
pH
7.53
6.5–8.5
Supply
7.7 hr/day
≥ 8 hr
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
TDS 429 ppm ≤ 500
Good
Fluoride 0.47 mg/L ≤ 1.0
Good
Turbidity 5.6 NTU ≤ 1
Concern
💡 What does this mean for you?Better supply quality and consistency reduces dependence on tanker/groundwater fallback.

🧹 Sanitation

Final Score: 65.6/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Sanitation?Sanitation reflects ODF status, sewage treatment and waste management regularity.
ODF
ODF+
ODF++
Sewage Coverage
76%
≥ 80%
Drainage
53%
≥ 90%
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
ODF Status ODF+ ODF++
Info
Sewage Coverage 76% ≥ 80%
Concern
Drainage Coverage 53% ≥ 90%
Concern
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher sanitation maturity lowers disease exposure and neighborhood nuisance.

🛣️ Infrastructure

Final Score: 43.8/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Infrastructure?Infrastructure score combines land use, urbanization, built form, night lights and terrain indicators.
Built-up
39.0%
Balanced band
Tree Cover
19.8%
≥ 15%
Urbanization
27.0
Higher better
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Built-up (LULC) 39.0% 40-70%
Contextual
Impervious Surface 16.2% < 70%
Good
NDVI Mean 0.300 > 0.3
Good
💡 What does this mean for you?Balanced built + green mix usually improves long-term livability resilience.

🏥 Amenities

Final Score: 52.0/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Amenities?Amenity score captures daily-access services in walk/short-drive radii.
Hospitals 500m
1
Target ≥1
Schools 1km
2
Target ≥3
Parks 500m
0
Target ≥1
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Hospitals (500m) 1 ≥1
Good
Schools (1km) 2 ≥3
Concern
Markets (1km) 2 ≥1
Good
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher local amenity density improves convenience and walkability.

🌳 Green Cover

Final Score: 62.4/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Green Cover?NDVI and vegetation structure are measured from satellite imagery to estimate neighborhood greenery.
NDVI Mean
0.338
Greenness index
Vegetation
52.3%
% green pixels
Dense Green
38.8%
Thick canopy
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
NDVI Mean 0.338 0.5 maps to score 100
Weighted 40%
Vegetation % 52.3% Direct % (cap 100)
Weighted 30%
Dense Green % 38.8% Scaled from 50%
Weighted 20%
Parks within 500m 2 Count * 33 (cap 100)
Weighted 10%
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher green metrics typically reduce heat stress and improve comfort.

🔊 Noise

Final Score: 97.5/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Noise?Noise uses measured day/night dB compared to CPCB zone limits.
Day dB
51.8
vs CPCB day limit
Night dB
40.0
vs CPCB night limit
Zone
residential
CPCB class
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Day Noise 51.8 dB ≤ 55.0 dB
Good
Night Noise 40.0 dB ≤ 45.0 dB
Good
Nearest Highway 2,007 m Higher usually quieter
Info
💡 What does this mean for you?Chronic high noise impacts stress, sleep quality and perceived comfort.

🌊 Flood Risk

Final Score: 73.9/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Flood Risk?Flood risk combines river exposure and local waterlogging vulnerability.
Overall Risk
Low
Lower is safer
River Risk
Low
Lower is safer
Waterlogging
Low
Lower is safer
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Overall Risk Low Low preferred
Info
River Flood Risk Low Low preferred
Info
Waterlogging Risk Low Low preferred
Info
💡 What does this mean for you?Lower flood risk means less disruption and lower hazard exposure.

🏚️ Earthquake Risk

Final Score: 81.8/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Earthquake Risk?Earthquake profile uses seismic zone, PGA and soil/liquefaction risk factors.
Seismic Zone
II
Lower risk zone preferred
Risk Level
Low
Low preferred
Liquefaction
Low
Low preferred
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Seismic Zone II II preferred
Info
Risk Level Low Low preferred
Info
PGA (475yr) 0.059 Lower preferred
Info
💡 What does this mean for you?Lower seismic hazard reduces structural and insurance risk exposure.

🌡️ Land Surface Temp

Final Score: 63.4/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Land Surface Temp?Land Surface Temperature reflects heat-island intensity from satellite thermal bands.
LST Mean
29.1°C
Lower better
LST Min
10.6°C
Context
LST Max
39.1°C
Lower better
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
LST Mean 29.1°C 20°C best / 45°C worst
Weighted by formula
LST Score 63.4 0-100
Computed
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
LST Mean (°C) 28.0 30.3 29.1
LST Min (°C) 12.7 8.5 10.6
LST Max (°C) 41.7 36.4 39.1
LST Score 68.2 58.7 63.4
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher heat exposure affects comfort, cooling load and health risk.

🏗️ Built-up Density

Final Score: 68.6/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Built-up Density?Built-up density measures extent of developed surface versus open space.
Built-up %
31.4%
Lower better
Open Space %
68.6%
Higher better
Built-up Score
68.6
0-100
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Built-up % 31.4% Inverse scoring
Score = 100 - builtup%
Open Space % 68.6% Context
Info
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Built-up % 24.1% 38.7% 31.4%
Open Space % 75.9% 61.3% 68.6%
Built-up Score 75.9 61.3 68.6
💡 What does this mean for you?Very high built-up often raises heat and runoff while reducing open environmental buffers.

💡 Night-time Lights

Final Score: 20.4/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Night-time Lights?Nighttime lights are a proxy for economic activity and electrification intensity.
Avg Radiance
10.19
Higher better
Max Radiance
20.94
Context
NTL Score
20.4
0-100
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Avg Radiance 10.19 Scaled to 50
Score = min(100, avg/50*100)
NTL Score 20.4 0-100
Computed
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Avg Radiance 13.37 7.01 10.19
Max Radiance 19.01 22.87 20.94
NTL Score 26.7 14.0 20.4
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher radiance often indicates stronger urban activity but can correlate with light pollution.

🏞️ Water Bodies

Final Score: 25.0/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Water Bodies?Water-bodies score reflects permanent and seasonal water presence in the analysis radius.
Permanent Water
7.15%
Higher generally better
Seasonal Water
83.59%
Context
Water Score
80.1
0-100
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Permanent Water % 7.15% 70% weight
Scaled against 10%
Seasonal Water % 83.59% 30% weight
Scaled against 20%
Water Score 80.1 0-100
Computed
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Permanent Water % 7.02% 7.28% 7.15%
Seasonal Water % 84.32% 82.86% 83.59%
Water Score 24.6 25.5 80.1
💡 What does this mean for you?Water presence can support cooling, recharge and ecological quality.

👥 Population Density

Final Score: 89.5/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Population Density?Population density indicates urban crowding pressure around the area.
Population
34,298
Estimated residents
Density/km²
2,097.3
Lower better for this score
Score
89.5
0-100
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Density/km² 2,097.3 Inverse scale up to 20,000
Lower -> higher score
Score 89.5 0-100
Computed
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Population Total 6,251 62,345 34,298
Density / km² 1,989.6 2,205.0 2,097.3
Pop Density Score 90.1 89.0 89.5
💡 What does this mean for you?Extremely high density can increase pressure on services and mobility.

⛲ Groundwater

Final Score: 59.7/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Groundwater?Groundwater score combines moisture, recharge, drought and trend indicators.
Soil Moisture
136.484
Higher better
Recharge
1.04
Higher better
PDSI
2.92
Higher better
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Soil Moisture 136.484 30% weight
Scaled
Recharge 1.04 25% weight
Scaled
PDSI 2.92 20% weight
Scaled
SM Trend -15.6686 15% weight
Scaled
Precipitation 1,803.34 10% weight
Scaled
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Soil Moisture 139.648 133.320 136.484
Recharge Estimate 0.89 1.20 1.04
PDSI 2.97 2.88 2.92
Groundwater Score 61.9 57.4 61.3
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher score suggests better long-term aquifer and moisture support conditions.

🌧️ Waterlogging

↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Waterlogging?Waterlogging combines topography, imperviousness and wetness indices across nearby grid cells.
Grid Count
156
Sampled cells
Avg Susceptibility
42.5
Lower is safer
High Risk Grids
12
High / Very High
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTargetStatus
Avg Susceptibility 42.5 < 40
Concern
Avg Slope 2.61° > 1°
Good
Avg Impervious 4.2% < 70%
Good
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher susceptibility and low slope increase monsoon water stagnation probability.

🚶 Walkability & Safety

↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Walkability & Safety?OSM amenity metrics reflect pedestrian, safety and urban accessibility infrastructure.
Footpaths
0
Higher better
Street Lamps
0
Higher better
Police/Fire Access
0
Presence
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Footpaths (500m) 0 ≥ 3
Concern
Sidewalk Roads (1km) 1 ≥ 5
Concern
Nearest Police Station 1,529 m ≤ 2000m
Context
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher OSM accessibility/safety features generally improve everyday livability.

⚠️ Risk Factors

↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Risk Factors?Nearby hazards and sensitive risk points mapped around this area.
Total Risks
3
Mapped points
Scoring Breakdown
CategoryRiskDistance / SeverityMeaning
Environmental Roadside waste dump 1085 m / Medium Informal waste dumping near road area
Accessibility Far from hospital 2229 m / Medium Nearest hospital >5km away
Water_drainage Open drainage channel 879 m / Low Uncovered drainage near residential area
💡 What does this mean for you?Closer and severe risks can affect insurance, resale and safety comfort.

🌬️ Air Quality: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

💧 Water Quality: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🧹 Sanitation: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🛣️ Infrastructure: Infrastructure Score Formula

Formula: Composite weighted model from GHSL/ESA/VIIRS/Terrain features
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Urbanization index27.0120%SMOD
Built-up balance39.0%15%Best in moderate band
NTL stability65.2%15%Power/activity consistency
Avg building height4.89 m10%Vertical infra proxy
Impervious %16.2%10%Moderate is optimal
Radiance3.0610%Development proxy
Slope0.94°10%Flatter is better
Green support19.8%10%Tree + grass contribution
This is the same weighted structure used in Livability Infrastructure model.
Final: 43.76 / 100

🏥 Amenities: Amenity Score Breakdown

Formula: Each amenity category is capped at 100, final score is averaged across categories
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Hospitals 500m1 * 33Cap 100Health access
Schools 1km2 * 20Cap 100Education access
Markets 1km2 * 33Cap 100Daily needs
Parks 500m0 * 33Cap 100Open space
Transit 1km0 * 50Cap 100Mobility
Category multipliers mirror the Livability snapshot logic.
Final: Final from amenity_scores table

🌳 Green Cover: Green Score Formula

Formula: Score = (NDVI*40%) + (Vegetation*30%) + (Dense Green*20%) + (Parks*10%)
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
NDVI component0.338 => 67.640%27.0
Vegetation component52.3% => 52.330%15.7
Dense green component38.8% => 77.720%15.5
Parks component2 => 66.010%6.6
This matches the Livability GreenCover model weighting logic.
Final: 64.87 / 100

🔊 Noise: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🌊 Flood Risk: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🏚️ Earthquake Risk: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🌡️ Land Surface Temp: LST Score Formula

Formula: Score = ((45 - LST Mean) / 25) * 100, clipped to [0,100]
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
LST Mean29.14 °CReference20°C best, 45°C worst
Lower land surface temperature means better livability.
Final: 63.44 / 100

🏗️ Built-up Density: Built-up Score Formula

Formula: Score = 100 - Built-up %
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Built-up %31.4%InverseLower is better
Dense concrete surfaces reduce infiltration and increase heat islands.
Final: 68.60 / 100

💡 Night-time Lights: Night-time Lights Formula

Formula: Score = min(100, (Avg Radiance / 50) * 100)
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Avg Radiance10.19Scale 0-50Higher indicates activity
Higher night radiance generally tracks electrification and economic intensity.
Final: 20.37 / 100

🏞️ Water Bodies: Water Bodies Score Formula

Formula: Score = (Permanent Water Score * 70%) + (Seasonal Water Score * 30%)
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Permanent water7.15%70%Scaled against 10% benchmark
Seasonal water83.59%30%Scaled against 20% benchmark
Permanent water has higher score weight than seasonal water.
Final: 80.05 / 100

👥 Population Density: Population Density Formula

Formula: Score = ((20000 - density_per_km²) / 20000) * 100, clipped to [0,100]
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Density2,097.3 /km²Inverse scaleLower density -> higher score
This follows the Livability PopulationDensity model.
Final: 89.51 / 100

⛲ Groundwater: Groundwater Score Formula

Formula: Weighted: Soil Moisture 30% + Recharge 25% + PDSI 20% + Trend 15% + Precipitation 10%
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Soil moisture136.48430%Scaled to 0-200
Recharge estimate1.0425%Scaled -200 to +400
PDSI2.9220%Scaled -4 to +4
SM trend-15.668615%Scaled -50 to +50
Precipitation1,803.3410%Scaled 800 to 1800
Exactly reused from Livability Groundwater model logic.
Final: 61.31 / 100

🌧️ Waterlogging: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🚶 Walkability & Safety: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

⚠️ Risk Factors: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

View full livability report for Amleshwar South →

Compliance Status

RERA registration, filings, and compliance flags based on public CG-RERA records.

Compliance Status Based on public CG-RERA records
3 Passed
1 Warning
2 N/A
RERA Registration Active
Reg No. PCGRERA020818000650 — Status: Ongoing
Section 3 · Source · View Certificate · RERA Official Page
No Penalty Orders
1 order(s) on record, none with penalty sections (Sec 38/39/40/59/61/63)
Sec 38–63 · Source
1 Order(s) in Last 12 Months
Recent: SM-EXA-2026-03510
Source · SM-EXA-2026-03510
Within Timeline
Target completion: 30 Mar 2028
Section 4 · Source
Quarterly Updates Not Available
No compliance snapshot data on record
Section 11 · Source
Annual Audit Not Available
No compliance snapshot data on record
Section 4(2)(l)(D) · Source
Each check is based on publicly available CG-RERA portal data as of Apr 2026. How this works →

Details

Registration, professional team, bank, promoters, and compliance history.

Registration Details
RERA Number
PCGRERA020818000650
Status
Ongoing
Project Type
Plotted Development
Approved Date
02 Aug 2018
Original End Date
30 Jun 2022
EWS Category
NO
Construction Cost
₹ 93236000
Land Cost
₹ 20442000
Proposed Completion
30 Mar 2028
Authorised Person
SANJAY GUPTA
Website
www.usassociates.in
View on Map
Professional Team
RoleNameLicense / Membership
Statutory CA JAYANT BHURA 506321
Quarterly CA Deepak Kumar Jain 400937
Engineer HEM KUMAR JAIN 142
Architect PRAPAN JAIN CA/2016/80484
Promoters
U
U.S. ASSOCIATES Partnership Firm
U
U.S. ASSOCIATES THROUGH - SANJAY GUPTA

Legal Orders & Cases

RERA legal orders, complaints, and case statistics filed against this project.

1
Total Cases
1
Last 12 Months
0
Older Cases
1
PDFs Available
Legal Orders (1)
ComplaintApplicantSectionDateSourcePDF
SM-EXA-2026-03510 CG-RERA - 26 Feb 2026 This project

Location

Project address, coordinates, and nearby places.

Location Details
Address
VILLAGE - MOTIPUR, PATAN, DURG (C.G.)
District
Durg
Tehsil
Patan
Coordinates
21.1650026, 81.5400461 View on Map
Neighborhood Intelligence

Explore nearby infrastructure around this project. Toggle categories to show/hide on the map.

Neighborhood Map 3 km radius

Buyer Checklist

Documents and verifications a buyer should review before purchase.

Buyer Document Verification Checklist

Key documents a buyer should verify before purchasing in this project. Items marked Available have data on Seemankan.

11/14 verified
  • RERA Registration Certificate Available
    Confirms the project is registered with RERA CG. Verify registration number, validity dates, and project details on the RERA portal.
    RERA No: PCGRERA020818000650
    View Certificate View on RERA Portal
  • Promoter Registration Certificate Available
    Builder / colonizer company registration certificate. Confirms the promoter entity is a registered firm, company, or society.
    Preview Preview
  • Approved Building / Sanction Plan Verify Independently
    Building plan sanctioned by the local authority. Verify floor count, setbacks, and FSI compliance.
  • Layout Plan Available
    Approved layout showing plot divisions, roads, open spaces, and common areas.
    Preview
  • Title Deed / Ownership Proof Available
    Proof that the promoter legally owns the land. Verify via Sub-Registrar records.
    Preview
  • Encumbrance Certificate Available
    Confirms the property is free from legal dues, mortgages, or liens. Obtain from Sub-Registrar office.
    Preview
  • Land Use / Diversion Certificate Available
    Required if land was converted from agricultural to non-agricultural use.
    Preview
  • Architect Certificate Available
    Certification from a registered architect confirming structural plans and compliance.
    View View View +31 more
  • Structural Engineer Certificate Available
    Certification from a structural engineer confirming building safety and load-bearing capacity.
    View View View +31 more
  • CA Financial Certificate Available
    Chartered Accountant certificate on financial status, project cost estimates, and fund utilization.
    Preview View View +29 more
  • Commencement Certificate Verify Independently
    Permission to begin construction issued by the local authority after plan approval.
  • NOCs (No Objection Certificates) Verify Independently
    NOCs from fire department, environment, water supply, electricity board, and other authorities.
  • Project Brochure / Specification Available
    Official brochure with unit types, amenities, and specifications. Compare with actual delivery.
    View View View +11 more
  • RERA Compliance Orders Available
    Check if any orders, penalties, or directions have been issued against this project by RERA.
    1 order(s) on record — review in Legal tab
Disclaimer: This checklist is for informational purposes only. "Available" means Seemankan has a copy from the RERA portal — it does not constitute legal verification. Always verify original documents with the concerned authorities and consult a legal advisor before making a purchase decision.

Risk Zone Within 5 km

Buffer zones (water bodies, airport restrictions) and risk sites (landfills, waste processing) detected within 3 km (immediate) and 5 km (extended) of the project.

0
Risk zones (within 5 km)
3 km: 0 3–5 km: 0
0
Water bodies (river/nala/lake)
3 km: 0 3–5 km: 0
0
Landfill / waste sites
3 km: 0 3–5 km: 0
0
Airport buffer overlap
3 km: 0 3–5 km: 0
Risk Zone Map (3 km & 5 km rings) Project marker centered
All Clear

No mapped risk zones within 3 km of this project.

Reviews

Verified buyer reviews and ratings for this project.

No reviews yet. Be the first to review this project!

Login to Write a Review

You need to be signed in to submit a review for this project.

Login or Register