Home / RERA Projects / ATAL VIHAR YOJNA, ARANG
ONGOING Residential Development RERA Page Project Website
GENERATE REPORT

ATAL VIHAR YOJNA, ARANG

Compliance Status
Partial Compliance
21.1805, 81.9617 Explore area
District
Raipur
Area
—
Promoter
CHHATTISGARH HOUSING BOARD DIVISION-04 RAIPUR
Project Information
Promoter CHHATTISGARH HOUSING BOARD DIVISION-04 RAIPUR
Type Residential Development
Status Ongoing
Completion 26 Sep 2025
RERA No. PCGRERA090718000510
Registered 09 Jul 2018
Original End 31 May 2023
Total Units 542 · 368 sold
EWS Category NO
Construction Cost ₹ 957081000
Land Cost ₹ 3203000
Authorised Person SANTOSH KUMAR GUPTA
Website www.cghb.gov.in
Address VILLAGE - ARANG, RAIPUR (C.G.)
At a Glance
542
Total Units
368
Units Sold
174
Unsold
1
Legal Cases
Sep 2025
Target Completion
65%
Completion
Amenities & Facilities (11)
BOUNDARY WALL
60%
COMMUNITY BUILDINGS
100%
ENERGY MAANAGEMENT
100%
INTERNAL ROADS AND FOOTPATHS
90%
LANDSCAPING AND TREE PLANTING
100%
SEWERAGE
100%
SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT AND DISPOSAL
0%
STORM WATER DRAINS
100%
STREET LIGHTING
100%
WATER CONSERVATION RAIN WATER HARVESTING
100%
WATER SUPPLY
100%
Project Professionals
SANJAY AGRAWAL
STATUTORY CA
VINOD KUMAR KHATRI
QUARTERLY CA
DY. COMMISSIONER OF HOUSING BOARD
ENGINEER
SANDEEP NEENA AND ASSOCIATES
ARCHITECT
Project Analysis

360° Project Intelligence

Comprehensive analysis across regulatory, livability, market, filing activity, and market readiness dimensions.

Regulatory
79
11 of 14 checks · Moderate Signals
Livability
59
Sector 3 · Moderate Signals
Legal
1
1 legal order(s) · 2 nearby
Filing Activity
532
442 docs · 90 quarterly updates
Market Readiness
68
Ongoing · due Sep 2025
Area Livability

Livability of Sector 3

Eighteen environmental, infrastructure and amenity parameters for the nearest mapped area (Sector 3 — 14.37 km from this project). Click any parameter for the underlying readings, thresholds and what they mean.



🏠 Livability Parameters

Latest readings for Sector 3. Only parameters with available data are shown below. Based on the latest readings for Sector 3.

C
Composite Score
58.8 /100
Average

🌬️ Air Quality

Final Score: 99.6/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Air Quality?AQI summarizes PM2.5, PM10 and gases. Lower pollution values improve public health outcomes.
AQI
51
Satisfactory
PM2.5
30.8 µg/m³
≤ 40
PM10
58.7 µg/m³
≤ 60
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
PM2.5 30.8 µg/m³ ≤ 40
Good
PM10 58.7 µg/m³ ≤ 60
Good
NO₂ 9.6 µg/m³ ≤ 40
Good
💡 What does this mean for you?Cleaner air lowers respiratory burden and improves outdoor comfort.

💧 Water Quality

Final Score: 86.6/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Water Quality?Water quality combines chemistry, supply duration and contamination markers.
TDS
299 ppm
≤ 500
pH
7.85
6.5–8.5
Supply
11.1 hr/day
≥ 8 hr
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
TDS 299 ppm ≤ 500
Good
Fluoride 0.35 mg/L ≤ 1.0
Good
Turbidity 2.1 NTU ≤ 1
Concern
💡 What does this mean for you?Better supply quality and consistency reduces dependence on tanker/groundwater fallback.

🧹 Sanitation

Final Score: 91.9/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Sanitation?Sanitation reflects ODF status, sewage treatment and waste management regularity.
ODF
ODF++
ODF++
Sewage Coverage
88%
≥ 80%
Drainage
94%
≥ 90%
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
ODF Status ODF++ ODF++
Info
Sewage Coverage 88% ≥ 80%
Good
Drainage Coverage 94% ≥ 90%
Good
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher sanitation maturity lowers disease exposure and neighborhood nuisance.

🛣️ Infrastructure

Final Score: 30.5/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Infrastructure?Infrastructure score combines land use, urbanization, built form, night lights and terrain indicators.
Built-up
4.7%
Balanced band
Tree Cover
6.5%
≥ 15%
Urbanization
10.0
Higher better
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Built-up (LULC) 4.7% 40-70%
Contextual
Impervious Surface 18.7% < 70%
Good
NDVI Mean 0.260 > 0.3
Concern
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Built-up (LULC) % 4.4% 4.9% 4.7%
Tree Cover % 9.7% 3.4% 6.5%
Urbanization Index 10.0 10.0 10.0
Infra Score 32.0 29.0 30.5
💡 What does this mean for you?Balanced built + green mix usually improves long-term livability resilience.

🏥 Amenities

Final Score: 40.6/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Amenities?Amenity score captures daily-access services in walk/short-drive radii.
Hospitals 500m
0
Target ≥1
Schools 1km
2
Target ≥3
Parks 500m
0
Target ≥1
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Hospitals (500m) 0 ≥1
Concern
Schools (1km) 2 ≥3
Concern
Markets (1km) 3 ≥1
Good
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher local amenity density improves convenience and walkability.

🌳 Green Cover

Final Score: 59.8/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Green Cover?NDVI and vegetation structure are measured from satellite imagery to estimate neighborhood greenery.
NDVI Mean
0.350
Greenness index
Vegetation
45.9%
% green pixels
Dense Green
27.9%
Thick canopy
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
NDVI Mean 0.350 0.5 maps to score 100
Weighted 40%
Vegetation % 45.9% Direct % (cap 100)
Weighted 30%
Dense Green % 27.9% Scaled from 50%
Weighted 20%
Parks within 500m 0 Count * 33 (cap 100)
Weighted 10%
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
NDVI Mean 0.291 0.408 0.350
Vegetation % 39.0% 52.9% 45.9%
Dense Green % 27.8% 28.1% 27.9%
Tree Canopy % 37.1% 24.9% 31.0%
Green Score 46.1 59.8 53.0
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher green metrics typically reduce heat stress and improve comfort.

🔊 Noise

Final Score: 100.0/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Noise?Noise uses measured day/night dB compared to CPCB zone limits.
Day dB
60.1
vs CPCB day limit
Night dB
55.0
vs CPCB night limit
Zone
residential
CPCB class
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Day Noise 60.1 dB ≤ 55.0 dB
Concern
Night Noise 55.0 dB ≤ 45.0 dB
Concern
Nearest Highway — m Higher usually quieter
Info
💡 What does this mean for you?Chronic high noise impacts stress, sleep quality and perceived comfort.

🌊 Flood Risk

Final Score: 10.0/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Flood Risk?Flood risk combines river exposure and local waterlogging vulnerability.
Overall Risk
Lowest
Lower is safer
River Risk
Low
Lower is safer
Waterlogging
Low
Lower is safer
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Overall Risk Lowest Low preferred
Info
River Flood Risk Low Low preferred
Info
Waterlogging Risk Low Low preferred
Info
💡 What does this mean for you?Lower flood risk means less disruption and lower hazard exposure.

🏚️ Earthquake Risk

Final Score: 10.0/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Earthquake Risk?Earthquake profile uses seismic zone, PGA and soil/liquefaction risk factors.
Seismic Zone
Zone II
Lower risk zone preferred
Risk Level
Low
Low preferred
Liquefaction
None
Low preferred
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Seismic Zone Zone II II preferred
Info
Risk Level Low Low preferred
Info
PGA (475yr) 0.0155g Lower preferred
Info
💡 What does this mean for you?Lower seismic hazard reduces structural and insurance risk exposure.

🌡️ Land Surface Temp

Final Score: 68.6/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Land Surface Temp?Land Surface Temperature reflects heat-island intensity from satellite thermal bands.
LST Mean
27.9°C
Lower better
LST Min
-4.1°C
Context
LST Max
39.4°C
Lower better
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
LST Mean 27.9°C 20°C best / 45°C worst
Weighted by formula
LST Score 68.6 0-100
Computed
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
LST Mean (°C) 27.4 28.3 27.9
LST Min (°C) -5.7 -2.4 -4.1
LST Max (°C) 38.8 40.1 39.4
LST Score 70.2 67.0 68.6
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher heat exposure affects comfort, cooling load and health risk.

🏗️ Built-up Density

Final Score: 95.3/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Built-up Density?Built-up density measures extent of developed surface versus open space.
Built-up %
4.7%
Lower better
Open Space %
95.3%
Higher better
Built-up Score
95.3
0-100
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Built-up % 4.7% Inverse scoring
Score = 100 - builtup%
Open Space % 95.3% Context
Info
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Built-up % 4.4% 4.9% 4.7%
Open Space % 95.6% 95.1% 95.3%
Built-up Score 95.6 95.1 95.3
💡 What does this mean for you?Very high built-up often raises heat and runoff while reducing open environmental buffers.

💡 Night-time Lights

Final Score: 10.7/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Night-time Lights?Nighttime lights are a proxy for economic activity and electrification intensity.
Avg Radiance
5.34
Higher better
Max Radiance
8.14
Context
NTL Score
10.7
0-100
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Avg Radiance 5.34 Scaled to 50
Score = min(100, avg/50*100)
NTL Score 10.7 0-100
Computed
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Avg Radiance 5.96 4.72 5.34
Max Radiance 9.26 7.02 8.14
NTL Score 11.9 9.5 10.7
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher radiance often indicates stronger urban activity but can correlate with light pollution.

🏞️ Water Bodies

Final Score: 100.0/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Water Bodies?Water-bodies score reflects permanent and seasonal water presence in the analysis radius.
Permanent Water
75.86%
Higher generally better
Seasonal Water
98.21%
Context
Water Score
100.0
0-100
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Permanent Water % 75.86% 70% weight
Scaled against 10%
Seasonal Water % 98.21% 30% weight
Scaled against 20%
Water Score 100.0 0-100
Computed
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Permanent Water % 84.77% 66.94% 75.86%
Seasonal Water % 98.97% 97.45% 98.21%
Water Score 100.0 100.0 100.0
💡 What does this mean for you?Water presence can support cooling, recharge and ecological quality.

👥 Population Density

Final Score: 96.3/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Population Density?Population density indicates urban crowding pressure around the area.
Population
9,917
Estimated residents
Density/km²
747.0
Lower better for this score
Score
96.3
0-100
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Density/km² 747.0 Inverse scale up to 20,000
Lower -> higher score
Score 96.3 0-100
Computed
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Population Total 2,801 17,032 9,917
Density / km² 891.6 602.4 747.0
Pop Density Score 95.5 97.0 96.3
💡 What does this mean for you?Extremely high density can increase pressure on services and mobility.

⛲ Groundwater

Final Score: 67.1/100 ↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Groundwater?Groundwater score combines moisture, recharge, drought and trend indicators.
Soil Moisture
149.326
Higher better
Recharge
0.85
Higher better
PDSI
3.53
Higher better
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Soil Moisture 149.326 30% weight
Scaled
Recharge 0.85 25% weight
Scaled
PDSI 3.53 20% weight
Scaled
SM Trend 0.0000 15% weight
Scaled
Precipitation 1,843.46 10% weight
Scaled
Side-by-Side: 1000m vs 3000m Comparison
Parameter 1000m 3000m Average (Final)
Soil Moisture 149.468 149.185 149.326
Recharge Estimate 0.84 0.86 0.85
PDSI 3.51 3.55 3.53
Groundwater Score 67.1 67.1 67.1
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher score suggests better long-term aquifer and moisture support conditions.

🌧️ Waterlogging

↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Waterlogging?Waterlogging combines topography, imperviousness and wetness indices across nearby grid cells.
Grid Count
168
Sampled cells
Avg Susceptibility
54.1
Lower is safer
High Risk Grids
142
High / Very High
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTargetStatus
Avg Susceptibility 54.1 < 40
Concern
Avg Slope 2.23° > 1°
Good
Avg Impervious 3.4% < 70%
Good
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher susceptibility and low slope increase monsoon water stagnation probability.

🚶 Walkability & Safety

↑ Higher is Better
ℹ️ What is Walkability & Safety?OSM amenity metrics reflect pedestrian, safety and urban accessibility infrastructure.
Footpaths
0
Higher better
Street Lamps
0
Higher better
Police/Fire Access
0
Presence
Scoring Breakdown
ParameterValueTarget / RuleStatus
Footpaths (500m) 0 ≥ 3
Concern
Sidewalk Roads (1km) 0 ≥ 5
Concern
Nearest Police Station — m ≤ 2000m
Context
💡 What does this mean for you?Higher OSM accessibility/safety features generally improve everyday livability.

🌬️ Air Quality: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

💧 Water Quality: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🧹 Sanitation: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🛣️ Infrastructure: Infrastructure Score Formula

Formula: Composite weighted model from GHSL/ESA/VIIRS/Terrain features
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Urbanization index10.0020%SMOD
Built-up balance4.7%15%Best in moderate band
NTL stability58.0%15%Power/activity consistency
Avg building height0.62 m10%Vertical infra proxy
Impervious %18.7%10%Moderate is optimal
Radiance4.9410%Development proxy
Slope0.10°10%Flatter is better
Green support6.5%10%Tree + grass contribution
This is the same weighted structure used in Livability Infrastructure model.
Final: 30.46 / 100

🏥 Amenities: Amenity Score Breakdown

Formula: Each amenity category is capped at 100, final score is averaged across categories
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Hospitals 500m0 * 33Cap 100Health access
Schools 1km2 * 20Cap 100Education access
Markets 1km3 * 33Cap 100Daily needs
Parks 500m0 * 33Cap 100Open space
Transit 1km0 * 50Cap 100Mobility
Category multipliers mirror the Livability snapshot logic.
Final: Final from amenity_scores table

🌳 Green Cover: Green Score Formula

Formula: Score = (NDVI*40%) + (Vegetation*30%) + (Dense Green*20%) + (Parks*10%)
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
NDVI component0.350 => 70.040%28.0
Vegetation component45.9% => 45.930%13.8
Dense green component27.9% => 55.920%11.2
Parks component0 => 0.010%0.0
This matches the Livability GreenCover model weighting logic.
Final: 52.96 / 100

🔊 Noise: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🌊 Flood Risk: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🏚️ Earthquake Risk: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🌡️ Land Surface Temp: LST Score Formula

Formula: Score = ((45 - LST Mean) / 25) * 100, clipped to [0,100]
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
LST Mean27.85 °CReference20°C best, 45°C worst
Lower land surface temperature means better livability.
Final: 68.60 / 100

🏗️ Built-up Density: Built-up Score Formula

Formula: Score = 100 - Built-up %
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Built-up %4.7%InverseLower is better
Dense concrete surfaces reduce infiltration and increase heat islands.
Final: 95.34 / 100

💡 Night-time Lights: Night-time Lights Formula

Formula: Score = min(100, (Avg Radiance / 50) * 100)
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Avg Radiance5.34Scale 0-50Higher indicates activity
Higher night radiance generally tracks electrification and economic intensity.
Final: 10.68 / 100

🏞️ Water Bodies: Water Bodies Score Formula

Formula: Score = (Permanent Water Score * 70%) + (Seasonal Water Score * 30%)
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Permanent water75.86%70%Scaled against 10% benchmark
Seasonal water98.21%30%Scaled against 20% benchmark
Permanent water has higher score weight than seasonal water.
Final: 100.00 / 100

👥 Population Density: Population Density Formula

Formula: Score = ((20000 - density_per_km²) / 20000) * 100, clipped to [0,100]
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Density747.0 /km²Inverse scaleLower density -> higher score
This follows the Livability PopulationDensity model.
Final: 96.27 / 100

⛲ Groundwater: Groundwater Score Formula

Formula: Weighted: Soil Moisture 30% + Recharge 25% + PDSI 20% + Trend 15% + Precipitation 10%
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Soil moisture149.32630%Scaled to 0-200
Recharge estimate0.8525%Scaled -200 to +400
PDSI3.5320%Scaled -4 to +4
SM trend0.000015%Scaled -50 to +50
Precipitation1,843.4610%Scaled 800 to 1800
Exactly reused from Livability Groundwater model logic.
Final: 67.10 / 100

🌧️ Waterlogging: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

🚶 Walkability & Safety: Score Source

Formula: Score is taken from latest area_scores snapshot for this area.
ComponentValueWeight/RuleContribution
Sourcearea_scores (latest by score_date)PipelineWeighted model in backend
Use this info with the panel breakdown values and thresholds.
Final: See card score

View full livability report for Sector 3 →

Compliance Status

RERA registration, filings, and compliance flags based on public CG-RERA records.

Compliance Status Based on public CG-RERA records
3 Passed
1 Issue(s)
2 N/A
RERA Registration Active
Reg No. PCGRERA090718000510 — Status: Ongoing
Section 3 · Source · RERA Official Page
No Penalty Orders
1 order(s) on record, none with penalty sections (Sec 38/39/40/59/61/63)
Sec 38–63 · Source
No Recent Orders
No orders filed in the last 12 months (older: 1)
Source
Completion Overdue
Was due 26 Sep 2025 — overdue by ~7 month(s)
Section 4 · Source
Quarterly Updates Not Available
No compliance snapshot data on record
Section 11 · Source
Annual Audit Not Available
No compliance snapshot data on record
Section 4(2)(l)(D) · Source
Each check is based on publicly available CG-RERA portal data as of Apr 2026. How this works →
Other Projects by Same Promoter (7)
ProjectRERA No.StatusDistrictType
AIS COLONY, SERIKHEDI PCGRERA090718000511 Ongoing Raipur Residential Development
ATAL VIHAR YOJNA, GOBRA NAWAPARA PCGRERA090718000508 Ongoing Raipur Residential Development
ATAL VIHAR YOJNA, URLA PCGRERA090718000507 Ongoing Raipur Residential Development
CONS. OF 33 NOS. ATAL AWAS WITH PART DEVELOPMENT WORK UNDER AAY AT BELBHATHA ABHANPUR PCGRERA071122001548 New Raipur Residential Development
GENERAL HOUSING SCHEME, SEJBAHAR PCGRERA090718000506 Ongoing Raipur Residential Development
special housing scheme for officers / employees of PCGRERA210520001112 New Raipur Residential Plotted Development
SPECIAL HOUSING SCHEME, SERIKHEDI PCGRERA170718000582 Ongoing Raipur Residential Development

Details

Registration, professional team, bank, promoters, and compliance history.

Registration Details
RERA Number
PCGRERA090718000510
Status
Ongoing
Project Type
Residential Development
Approved Date
09 Jul 2018
Original End Date
31 May 2023
EWS Category
NO
Construction Cost
₹ 957081000
Land Cost
₹ 3203000
Proposed Completion
26 Sep 2025
Authorised Person
SANTOSH KUMAR GUPTA
Website
www.cghb.gov.in
View on Map
Professional Team
RoleNameLicense / Membership
Statutory CA Sanjay Agrawal 096775
Quarterly CA VINOD KUMAR KHATRI 071797
Engineer DY. COMMISSIONER OF HOUSING BOARD CGHB
Architect Sandeep Neena and Associates CA/94-89/12366
Promoters
C
CHHATTISGARH HOUSING BOARD DIVISION-04 RAIPUR Government/Semi Government Agency
C
CHHATTISGARH HOUSING BOARD DIVISION-04 RAIPUR THROUGH - SANTOSH KUMAR GUPTA

Legal Orders & Cases

RERA legal orders, complaints, and case statistics filed against this project.

1
Total Cases
0
Last 12 Months
1
Older Cases
1
PDFs Available
Legal Orders (1)
ComplaintApplicantSectionDateSourcePDF
SM-EXP-2024-02517 CG-RERA - 23 Oct 2024 This project

Location

Project address, coordinates, and nearby places.

Location Details
Address
VILLAGE - ARANG, RAIPUR (C.G.)
District
Raipur
Tehsil
Arang
Coordinates
21.1804834, 81.9617039 View on Map
Neighborhood Intelligence

Explore nearby infrastructure around this project. Toggle categories to show/hide on the map.

Neighborhood Map 3 km radius
RERA Projects Near ATAL VIHAR YOJNA, ARANG 2 found within 3 km
# Project District Status Distance
1 PMAY OF 290 DUS AT ARANG ,RAIPUR Raipur Ongoing 0.76 km
2 SHRI RAM VIHAR Raipur Ongoing 2.12 km

Buyer Checklist

Documents and verifications a buyer should review before purchase.

Buyer Document Verification Checklist

Key documents a buyer should verify before purchasing in this project. Items marked Available have data on Seemankan.

12/14 verified
  • RERA Registration Certificate Available
    Confirms the project is registered with RERA CG. Verify registration number, validity dates, and project details on the RERA portal.
    RERA No: PCGRERA090718000510
    View on RERA Portal
  • Promoter Registration Certificate Available
    Builder / colonizer company registration certificate. Confirms the promoter entity is a registered firm, company, or society.
    Preview
  • Approved Building / Sanction Plan Available
    Building plan sanctioned by the local authority. Verify floor count, setbacks, and FSI compliance.
    Preview Preview
  • Layout Plan Available
    Approved layout showing plot divisions, roads, open spaces, and common areas.
    Preview
  • Title Deed / Ownership Proof Available
    Proof that the promoter legally owns the land. Verify via Sub-Registrar records.
    Preview
  • Encumbrance Certificate Available
    Confirms the property is free from legal dues, mortgages, or liens. Obtain from Sub-Registrar office.
    Preview
  • Land Use / Diversion Certificate Verify Independently
    Required if land was converted from agricultural to non-agricultural use.
  • Architect Certificate Available
    Certification from a registered architect confirming structural plans and compliance.
    View View View +28 more
  • Structural Engineer Certificate Available
    Certification from a structural engineer confirming building safety and load-bearing capacity.
    View View View +28 more
  • CA Financial Certificate Available
    Chartered Accountant certificate on financial status, project cost estimates, and fund utilization.
    Preview View View +29 more
  • Commencement Certificate Verify Independently
    Permission to begin construction issued by the local authority after plan approval.
  • NOCs (No Objection Certificates) Available
    NOCs from fire department, environment, water supply, electricity board, and other authorities.
    Preview
  • Project Brochure / Specification Available
    Official brochure with unit types, amenities, and specifications. Compare with actual delivery.
    View View View +17 more
  • RERA Compliance Orders Available
    Check if any orders, penalties, or directions have been issued against this project by RERA.
    1 order(s) on record — review in Legal tab
Disclaimer: This checklist is for informational purposes only. "Available" means Seemankan has a copy from the RERA portal — it does not constitute legal verification. Always verify original documents with the concerned authorities and consult a legal advisor before making a purchase decision.

Risk Zone Within 5 km

Buffer zones (water bodies, airport restrictions) and risk sites (landfills, waste processing) detected within 3 km (immediate) and 5 km (extended) of the project.

1
Risk zones (within 5 km)
3 km: 1 3–5 km: 0
0
Water bodies (river/nala/lake)
3 km: 0 3–5 km: 0
1
Landfill / waste sites
3 km: 1 3–5 km: 0
0
Airport buffer overlap
3 km: 0 3–5 km: 0
Risk Zone Map (3 km & 5 km rings) Project marker centered
Landfill / Waste Sites (1)
  • Arang MSW Dump Site ≤3 km
    Legacy dump · 500m buffer
    2.13 km

Reviews

Verified buyer reviews and ratings for this project.

No reviews yet. Be the first to review this project!

Login to Write a Review

You need to be signed in to submit a review for this project.

Login or Register